This is one of my favourite stories in the book of Mark. Open your eyes and your heart and it will become clear that jesus walks with all men. Makes me quite emotional actually ❤✝️
I agree. Someone commented that they liked this account from the gospel of Mark. Someone had to make sure to point out that it was described in Luke. Nitpicking at its best.
Luke’s story of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus have a direct correlation with the Apostle Paul’s account of scripture being veiled. In 2 Corinthians 4:3-4 the Apostle Paul says: 3 And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost, 4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them. In 2 Corinthians 3:13-16, the Apostle Paul explains that when Moses went up the mountain to speak with God and came back down, his face shined like the sun. The light represents truth. Because the light was so bright the Israelites put a veil over the face of Moses until it faded. Paul explains that even as the scriptures are read a veil covers their heart. So, anyone reading the bible can read it countless times and not understand it. Paul then goes onto explain that the only way to lift the veil (to see the light of truth) is if a person is joined to Christ. This is what Jesus explained in His teaching on being the bread of life. This is what we call actual “communion” with God. This corresponds with the two disciples on the road to Emmaus who don’t understand the scriptures and don’t recognize Jesus even though they were His disciples. It was because of the Eucharist that they recognized Him and understood the meaning of the scriptures. It makes literally true what Jesus said: without me you can do nothing. It was Jesus, in the Eucharist, that reveals the truth of the scriptures then. Therefore, it is true today that we rely on our Lord to reveal the truth because He is the Truth.
You're right, except for one thing: that's not the Eucharist, but the Lord's Supper. Not as in we'll be eating the Lord for supper, but eating supper with the Lord. I'm sorry but from this part onwards I will thrust the sword of the Word without holding back: The Eucharist claims the blasphemy bread is transubstantiated into the literal flesh of Jesus. In other words, it is LITERALLY JESUS. False. • Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There!’ do not believe it. (Matthew 24:23) What does the priest say when he raises the blasphemy bread? "BEHOLD the LAMB OF GOD who takes away the sins of the world." He took it from John 1. All we behold is a child of Satan, the father of lies (John 8:44). • And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst...It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life. (John 6:35, 63) Jesus is the metaphorical bread of life. When we receive Him, we shall not want (Psalm 23); we won't hunger for another slice of lifebread. Furthermore, it is the Spirit who gives life; the words of Jesus Christ which the Holy Spirit wrote through the gospel writers are what give us life, not the bread or His literal flesh and blood. That is why we obey the Scriptures, which give us life, and not Catechism. • But Simon Peter answered Him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. Again, it's the words Jesus spoke that give eternal life, not His body or blood. Only the people who stayed behind understood this. • ...and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “Take, eat; this is My body which is broken for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death till He comes. (1 Corinthians 11:24-26) Common sense would tell you that you cannot do something in memory of someone if that someone were still with you, body and blood. Jesus said to do communion to REMEMBER His death, not replicate it. We proclaim His death, His broken body on the cross, to remind ourselves of our forgiven sins, not to become weekly messiahvores to have our sins forgiven again. • But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, ...For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified. (Hebrews 10:12, 14) Jesus died ONCE, paying 100% the sins of everyone, which takes effect when we believe in Him. If Jesus left some sin for you to pay in purgatory, He's neither all-powerful nor all-loving to leave your tab unpaid and make you suffer for it. • For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit. (1 Peter 3:18) Even your so-called first pope said this; Jesus died once to pay for all sins therefore no purgatory. If you disagree, you are essentially saying Peter was fallible, which is also true. That makes him a flimsy rock which nullifies your version of Matthew 16:16, making you all Satan's children according to John 8:44 for propagating that teaching. Hopefully you don't believe in this. The Bible, the word of God, is completely against the Eucharist. You cannot refute it without adding to it (Prov 30:5-6), which God forbids.
A história de "A Caminho de Emaús" está descrita na Bíblia, em Lucas 24:13-32. A experiência dos discípulos na estrada de Emaús pode ajudar a saber como fortalecer o testemunho de Jesus Cristo e Seu evangelho.
They were disciples. They DID know Him. Otherwise they wouldn't have recognized who He was when He vanished. Jesus had a different appearance now that He is resurrected. I tell ya though, I wish I could be privy to the conversation they had on the road to Emmaus!
Well, Luke gives us the highlights about what they discussed. Interesting would have been the conversation on the way back to Jerusalem! Like, "how did we not know who He was at first?"
Right on about the changed appearance, His body was perfected. He opened their eyes to the Old Testament, not just pointing out the few prophecies which explicitly mention Him, but showing them that every single word of the Old Testament was symbolic of Christ and the Church from Moses to the Prophets. We may not have exactly what He said word for word, but we can learn the teachings He gave them about the Old Testament if we read the early church fathers. I'd highly recommend reading Origen's commentaries on Exodus or Joshua for an introduction. But all of the early church interpreted all of the Old Testament as symbolic about Christ. Not that the those things didn't happen in the Old Testament, but their significance is in the things they foreshadowed.
Actually, when Jesus Christ appeared to the 2 disciples, He didn't appear in the physical form that He used to be before the crucifixion. According to the Bible, the 2 disciples didn't recognize that was Jesus until Jesus broke the bread.
You must never add anything from the bible (Rev 22:17). Where in the bible did Jesus say "This is my body" in the bread of resurrection? Jesus only said it once during the Passover night.
This ok but doesn't really say much and its scary how the faces of the two men look at him. The only one I like is with tha italian actor. Road to emmues 2010.
#1they are not walking on a road, #2They were looking right into his face but the scripture says they were in true remorse and sadness that when he came upon them but they werent here at all,. #3 It would be impossible to not know that was Jesus when they already knew him and knew what he looked like and then BAM no head covering? or robe to hid his identity? which is why they would not have recognized him... And they even make him a blonde British man? umm... yeah noo
Mark 16:12 - After these things he appeared in another form to two of them, as they were walking into the country. So even if they looked at him they wouldn't know. :)
This will always be my favourite. 1 disciple is named Cleophas and the other was unnamed. So it can be me, you or anybody Walking with Jesus.
This is one of my favourite stories in the book of Mark. Open your eyes and your heart and it will become clear that jesus walks with all men. Makes me quite emotional actually ❤✝️
Actually, it's in the Gospel of Luke, chapter 24.
@@jamestrotter3162yes it is!
This is so beautiful, appearance of our Lord Jesus on the road to Emmaus.
My second most favorite New Testament story behind Mary seeing Jesus just after he comes out of the tomb.
Love this. So well done
Wait is that the actor who played Lucifer on the tv show of the same name?
Yes
This is a powerful clip! I disagree with all the nitpicking in the comments here...
I agree. Someone commented that they liked this account from the gospel of Mark. Someone had to make sure to point out that it was described in Luke. Nitpicking at its best.
2:25 Goosebumps
Someone was playing this in my tf2 game
Luke’s story of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus have a direct correlation with the Apostle Paul’s account of scripture being veiled. In 2 Corinthians 4:3-4 the Apostle Paul says: 3 And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost, 4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them. In 2 Corinthians 3:13-16, the Apostle Paul explains that when Moses went up the mountain to speak with God and came back down, his face shined like the sun. The light represents truth. Because the light was so bright the Israelites put a veil over the face of Moses until it faded. Paul explains that even as the scriptures are read a veil covers their heart. So, anyone reading the bible can read it countless times and not understand it. Paul then goes onto explain that the only way to lift the veil (to see the light of truth) is if a person is joined to Christ. This is what Jesus explained in His teaching on being the bread of life. This is what we call actual “communion” with God. This corresponds with the two disciples on the road to Emmaus who don’t understand the scriptures and don’t recognize Jesus even though they were His disciples. It was because of the Eucharist that they recognized Him and understood the meaning of the scriptures. It makes literally true what Jesus said: without me you can do nothing. It was Jesus, in the Eucharist, that reveals the truth of the scriptures then. Therefore, it is true today that we rely on our Lord to reveal the truth because He is the Truth.
You're right, except for one thing: that's not the Eucharist, but the Lord's Supper. Not as in we'll be eating the Lord for supper, but eating supper with the Lord. I'm sorry but from this part onwards I will thrust the sword of the Word without holding back:
The Eucharist claims the blasphemy bread is transubstantiated into the literal flesh of Jesus. In other words, it is LITERALLY JESUS. False.
• Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There!’ do not believe it. (Matthew 24:23)
What does the priest say when he raises the blasphemy bread? "BEHOLD the LAMB OF GOD who takes away the sins of the world." He took it from John 1. All we behold is a child of Satan, the father of lies (John 8:44).
• And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst...It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life. (John 6:35, 63)
Jesus is the metaphorical bread of life. When we receive Him, we shall not want (Psalm 23); we won't hunger for another slice of lifebread. Furthermore, it is the Spirit who gives life; the words of Jesus Christ which the Holy Spirit wrote through the gospel writers are what give us life, not the bread or His literal flesh and blood. That is why we obey the Scriptures, which give us life, and not Catechism.
• But Simon Peter answered Him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.
Again, it's the words Jesus spoke that give eternal life, not His body or blood. Only the people who stayed behind understood this.
• ...and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “Take, eat; this is My body which is broken for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death till He comes. (1 Corinthians 11:24-26)
Common sense would tell you that you cannot do something in memory of someone if that someone were still with you, body and blood. Jesus said to do communion to REMEMBER His death, not replicate it. We proclaim His death, His broken body on the cross, to remind ourselves of our forgiven sins, not to become weekly messiahvores to have our sins forgiven again.
• But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, ...For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified. (Hebrews 10:12, 14)
Jesus died ONCE, paying 100% the sins of everyone, which takes effect when we believe in Him. If Jesus left some sin for you to pay in purgatory, He's neither all-powerful nor all-loving to leave your tab unpaid and make you suffer for it.
• For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit. (1 Peter 3:18)
Even your so-called first pope said this; Jesus died once to pay for all sins therefore no purgatory. If you disagree, you are essentially saying Peter was fallible, which is also true. That makes him a flimsy rock which nullifies your version of Matthew 16:16, making you all Satan's children according to John 8:44 for propagating that teaching. Hopefully you don't believe in this.
The Bible, the word of God, is completely against the Eucharist. You cannot refute it without adding to it (Prov 30:5-6), which God forbids.
A história de "A Caminho de Emaús" está descrita na Bíblia, em Lucas 24:13-32. A experiência dos discípulos na estrada de Emaús pode ajudar a saber como fortalecer o testemunho de Jesus Cristo e Seu evangelho.
Wow !
Did it turn black for anyone else at the end
yeah'
Trevor Robulak yeah
Amen🙏
What's name of this movie
Justin Biebers history
The " passion " BBC drama .
@@lalomantree good one
@@lalomantree lol
They were disciples. They DID know Him. Otherwise they wouldn't have recognized who He was when He vanished. Jesus had a different appearance now that He is resurrected.
I tell ya though, I wish I could be privy to the conversation they had on the road to Emmaus!
Well, Luke gives us the highlights about what they discussed. Interesting would have been the conversation on the way back to Jerusalem! Like, "how did we not know who He was at first?"
Right on about the changed appearance, His body was perfected.
He opened their eyes to the Old Testament, not just pointing out the few prophecies which explicitly mention Him, but showing them that every single word of the Old Testament was symbolic of Christ and the Church from Moses to the Prophets. We may not have exactly what He said word for word, but we can learn the teachings He gave them about the Old Testament if we read the early church fathers. I'd highly recommend reading Origen's commentaries on Exodus or Joshua for an introduction. But all of the early church interpreted all of the Old Testament as symbolic about Christ. Not that the those things didn't happen in the Old Testament, but their significance is in the things they foreshadowed.
I’m perplexed
O MOJ BOZE,🙏🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️
Love it
❤️✝️🕊AMJESUSEN❤️✝️🕊
😢🤗
My mans lookin like Keanu reeves
Ay tho
Is jebis on fa rod to emmms
Ok
Wow
0:56 he should portrayed Jesus here😊😊😊
Funnily enough that actor who played that man is Tom Ellis who also played the main character:Lucifer in the Netflix show Lucifer.
❤
✝️✝️
Fair haired?
This video is very funnies bekos I wos actualie thair. I wos the Jesis and I did not’nt no thay wos filming. Very funnies ecperience
The presentation in this clip isn't quite true,
Nice
Hi
It is lewis
Im a bit confused
same
this just dosent make any sense :(
@@kaitlynkelly4759 please explain us
are they disciples or pilgrims?
was the other guy god?
@@katealexander7579 two of them are disciples, and the third one is Jesus Christ, our God
How come jesus looks like Zach galifiankis. Get with it history.
Actually, when Jesus Christ appeared to the 2 disciples, He didn't appear in the physical form that He used to be before the crucifixion. According to the Bible, the 2 disciples didn't recognize that was Jesus until Jesus broke the bread.
Lol get with your history.
Seems the one with long black Hair muck likely better as Jesus
welsh actor who played Lucifer's role..
You must never add anything from the bible (Rev 22:17). Where in the bible did Jesus say "This is my body" in the bread of resurrection? Jesus only said it once during the Passover night.
It's a movie.
Luke 24:35
This ok but doesn't really say much and its scary how the faces of the two men look at him.
The only one I like is with tha italian actor. Road to emmues 2010.
I is juices
#1they are not walking on a road, #2They were looking right into his face but the scripture says they were in true remorse and sadness that when he came upon them but they werent here at all,. #3 It would be impossible to not know that was Jesus when they already knew him and knew what he looked like and then BAM no head covering? or robe to hid his identity? which is why they would not have recognized him... And they even make him a blonde British man? umm... yeah noo
Mark 16:12 - After these things he appeared in another form to two of them, as they were walking into the country.
So even if they looked at him they wouldn't know. :)
Relax, brother. You can forget the message of an entire book if you only focus on the typos.
Luke 24:35
Fockin ell
Jesus does not look the worse for wear.