I had the 147 Cappuccino dial the first time on a vacation in Paris on my wrist. And fell in love instantly with the size and the amazing dial. At the time was not willing to pay full retail for it, so I left it in the back of my mind. About half a year later…I saw it online for a better price and my first ever Seiko got into my collection. I fully agree with your review! I love this watch on so many straps!!! And on an aftermarket bracelet.
I’ve had the limited edition white/blue version for over a year now. Still one of my favorites! Seems like everyone likes the grey dial but this watch comes in a bunch of great colors.
That SPB213 looks exquisite! Unfortunately, I never had the opportunity to see one at my local AD. Maybe I would've pulled the trigger on that if I saw it. I guess the grey one gravitate towards rolex's rhodium dials.
Love the radial brushing on the bezel. I have the SPB 297 (SBDC 165) Glacier Save The Ocean Special Edition, and feel the same way you do about yours. And I have many more expensive watches, but this one is just the perfect every day wear.
To be honest, the radial brushing kinda grew to me. Don’t notice it anymore because of the beauty of the dial every time i look at it. 😅 I agree, the watch has a simple charm that makes it like-able no matter how big or small the collection. Glad you enjoyed, Mitch.
It took me a whole year to pull the trigger on this. Went back and forth for 12 months trying to convince myself to not buy it but in the end I bought it. And like you I don't wear anything else now haha
Had the jdm version sbdc101. Wore for 1 week than sold.nits a beauty but too much of a dressy timepiece for me. Marked up the bezel on the 1st day I wore it. Now I have the spb317 and couldn't be happier.
I think my ideal 3 watch Seiko diver collection will be the skx009 sla023 and spb143. More research mist be done however. Including procurement of the spb143. And selling some unmentioned. Thanks for your video.
That's what I dislike about starburst dials. Legibility is a big thing for me and if there is too much glare, some reflective effect which reduces contrast or causes distraction from reading the time, then I can't be happy with that watch. I've had a few regret purchases over the years due to that. This is why it is so important to witness a watch in person and not buy online or order from just seeing photographs. Happens on some high end watches too. I went to a Grand Seiko boutique to have a look at some GS divers and their latest and most expensive (non-limited edition) diver has this nice wavy pattern, but which causes a terrible loss in contrast due to glare under certain lighting or lighting angles. I went from drooling over the online photos, to knowing that I absolutely did not want that watch even if it were the cheaper of the two.
Wow. I just checked your video list. Your SOTC is massive. Which brings me to your comment about owning this watch makes you regret owning other watches.
Thank you for watching, and yes, that is true. Most modern Seiko's like the turtle's and sumo's and also the baby mm200's. I regret having had them ever since buying this one. That is just a personal opinion, of course. It's more of a trial and error process in collecting. You get to know what type/size of watch you really want through previous purchases, and the next time around, you know what fits your style.
I have the San Martin homage of this watch. I purchased it to see if I liked it enough to buy the actual Seiko. It’s specifications/dimensions Are exactly the same and in some cases dare I say better. The one issue I have with buying the Seiko Is the size(lug to lug). I think it wears large. I have a 7 1/2 inch wrist and it Just feels/looks big on the wrist. I know it’s preference but that’s my two cents.
I have a similar wrist size and dont find the lug to lug too large. I think it's less than 47mm which is compact for a diver and is designed to fit smaller wrists. One of the smallest Seiko divers available. Like you say it is personal preference.
It’s 48 lug to lug… But I just didn’t take it conformed to the wrist as well as many of their other dive watches. I realize they were updating an existing design. However I believe the Original 62MAS was tiny By today’s standards. Less than 38 mm.
@@chi1057 Don’t mean to be argumentative but I don’t think the logs turn down very well which I know is a product of the original case design. And I’ll also find it a little bit slab sided Similar to my Rolex submariner
I mean people complain a lot about price but it is much better looking than other prospects. Perfectly sized and at the end of the day anyone can buy for 1200eur. Not 2000 eur like many other brand and lets face it, there much higher priced diver watches that dont taper etc.
For me personally the issue I had with the watch is it needs a tapering bracelet. the movement needs to be well regulated not a gable to see if you get an accurate one or not. And the QC needs to be perfect. In order to justify the over $1000. Because in its current state it feels sooo much like a cash grab to cash in on its die hard fans and it does provide the value it used to provide
Interesting points. However, I paid below the retail because it was on sale so i’m not bothered in the price department. On the QC side. Seiko’s that are not SLA’s are questionable. Misaligned bezels and what not. This is my 3rd 6R35 (the two were sumos) and so far no qc issues. It is a miss or hit indeed.
@@KirbyYoung thanks for quick response. I really like this watch with its mechanism, history and dimensions. I just hesitate about scratching the bezel. If i saw a few scratches on bezel, its actually deal breaker for me. In short, i couldnt find any seiko diver with ceramic bezel on 39-41 mm diameter...
Have you seen this watch personally? On the internet, it did not catch my attention. But after seeing it on the shelves of a local seiko ad. It looked perfect. Anyway, I hope you get one soon. Thanks for watching.
@@KirbyYoung Actually have. I tried several on wrist. 1 of the 3 had a misaligned bezel. I love the way it looks but.... my only concern is that I don't think it'll get the wrist time it deserves. How comfortable do you find it? What other watches do you have in your collection that this competes wrist time for?
@JC if you do have a lot of watches. It may be difficult to designate wrist time. I have an SLA and an LX and some others too. Here's the competition. th-cam.com/video/h1hDdzJGjRs/w-d-xo.html
@@KirbyYoung Going to watch now! Just off the top, yeah you have too many as well! LOL. SPB143 getting the most wrist time? Yeah... I have more than I need. For sure...
@JC Yep that is a lot. 😁It's on the top 3. I usually switch between watches in a day. The spb143 is a rather all around choice. And dont really fear giving it a ding or two.
I had the 147 Cappuccino dial the first time on a vacation in Paris on my wrist. And fell in love instantly with the size and the amazing dial. At the time was not willing to pay full retail for it, so I left it in the back of my mind. About half a year later…I saw it online for a better price and my first ever Seiko got into my collection. I fully agree with your review! I love this watch on so many straps!!! And on an aftermarket bracelet.
I’ve had the limited edition white/blue version for over a year now. Still one of my favorites! Seems like everyone likes the grey dial but this watch comes in a bunch of great colors.
That SPB213 looks exquisite! Unfortunately, I never had the opportunity to see one at my local AD. Maybe I would've pulled the trigger on that if I saw it. I guess the grey one gravitate towards rolex's rhodium dials.
Love the radial brushing on the bezel. I have the SPB 297 (SBDC 165) Glacier Save The Ocean Special Edition, and feel the same way you do about yours. And I have many more expensive watches, but this one is just the perfect every day wear.
To be honest, the radial brushing kinda grew to me. Don’t notice it anymore because of the beauty of the dial every time i look at it. 😅 I agree, the watch has a simple charm that makes it like-able no matter how big or small the collection. Glad you enjoyed, Mitch.
It took me a whole year to pull the trigger on this. Went back and forth for 12 months trying to convince myself to not buy it but in the end I bought it. And like you I don't wear anything else now haha
I'm glad you are enjoying it. It is already a classic, in my opinion.
Had the jdm version sbdc101. Wore for 1 week than sold.nits a beauty but too much of a dressy timepiece for me. Marked up the bezel on the 1st day I wore it. Now I have the spb317 and couldn't be happier.
Your putting out some great content, keep it up!
That is wonderful to hear! Will sure do. Thank you for your support!
I think my ideal 3 watch Seiko diver collection will be the skx009 sla023 and spb143. More research mist be done however. Including procurement of the spb143. And selling some unmentioned. Thanks for your video.
That's a solid trio. If only I had the courage to keep just 3 watches. I would be free. Kidding aside, thank you for watching!
For me: MM300 Tuna, 62 Mas re-issue, and Williard Special Edition Grey Dial.
That's what I dislike about starburst dials. Legibility is a big thing for me and if there is too much glare, some reflective effect which reduces contrast or causes distraction from reading the time, then I can't be happy with that watch. I've had a few regret purchases over the years due to that.
This is why it is so important to witness a watch in person and not buy online or order from just seeing photographs. Happens on some high end watches too. I went to a Grand Seiko boutique to have a look at some GS divers and their latest and most expensive (non-limited edition) diver has this nice wavy pattern, but which causes a terrible loss in contrast due to glare under certain lighting or lighting angles.
I went from drooling over the online photos, to knowing that I absolutely did not want that watch even if it were the cheaper of the two.
Wow. I just checked your video list. Your SOTC is massive. Which brings me to your comment about owning this watch makes you regret owning other watches.
Thank you for watching, and yes, that is true. Most modern Seiko's like the turtle's and sumo's and also the baby mm200's. I regret having had them ever since buying this one. That is just a personal opinion, of course. It's more of a trial and error process in collecting. You get to know what type/size of watch you really want through previous purchases, and the next time around, you know what fits your style.
@@KirbyYoung I think the trend to smaller case size is a boon for the industry. Variety is always good. Thank you for the reply.
I have the San Martin homage of this watch. I purchased it to see if I liked it enough to buy the actual Seiko. It’s specifications/dimensions Are exactly the same and in some cases dare I say better. The one issue I have with buying the Seiko Is the size(lug to lug). I think it wears large. I have a 7 1/2 inch wrist and it Just feels/looks big on the wrist. I know it’s preference but that’s my two cents.
I have a similar wrist size and dont find the lug to lug too large. I think it's less than 47mm which is compact for a diver and is designed to fit smaller wrists. One of the smallest Seiko divers available. Like you say it is personal preference.
It’s 48 lug to lug… But I just didn’t take it conformed to the wrist as well as many of their other dive watches. I realize they were updating an existing design. However I believe the Original 62MAS was tiny By today’s standards. Less than 38 mm.
@John Buckmaster it's 47.6 lug to lug which isn't large for a dive watch. Sounds like you're after something more vintage sized.
@@chi1057 Don’t mean to be argumentative but I don’t think the logs turn down very well which I know is a product of the original case design. And I’ll also find it a little bit slab sided Similar to my Rolex submariner
@John Buckmaster I guess there's no right or wrong, if it doesn't suit you then fair enough 👍
It looks like 62 MAS. Iconic and very, very right
It is a clean reissue indeed. Perfect, as I would say. Especially if bought at a discount or preowned.
Agree its beautiful. I would likely own one if the movement weren't so crappy.
Mine is averaging +0.6sec/day. Can't really complain.
Great camera.. super clear HD quality
It looks good on you. I love my blue dial version!🤛
Thank you, friend! Awesome, the blue dial! You really can't go wrong with the 62mas lineup. Such versatility!
I mean people complain a lot about price but it is much better looking than other prospects. Perfectly sized and at the end of the day anyone can buy for 1200eur. Not 2000 eur like many other brand and lets face it, there much higher priced diver watches that dont taper etc.
That's right! The availability of this watch speaks for itself. It's mostly currently out of stock now in my country.
For me personally the issue I had with the watch is it needs a tapering bracelet. the movement needs to be well regulated not a gable to see if you get an accurate one or not. And the QC needs to be perfect. In order to justify the over $1000. Because in its current state it feels sooo much like a cash grab to cash in on its die hard fans and it does provide the value it used to provide
Interesting points. However, I paid below the retail because it was on sale so i’m not bothered in the price department. On the QC side. Seiko’s that are not SLA’s are questionable. Misaligned bezels and what not. This is my 3rd 6R35 (the two were sumos) and so far no qc issues. It is a miss or hit indeed.
On point. Great review!
Thank you, Jmart! Glad you enjoyed.
Thé lume HAS to be by the 3 or it wouldn’t be a certified diver
Says who?
@@2K9s The international organization for standardization, ISO.
@@jpjona9807 was hoping for the specific 6425*2018 iso update answer. 6425 never specified that the date/lume window be at the 3 o’clock position.
Best diver out
Very nice watch. So is there any scratches on bezel so far?
None so far. Still looks the same the day I got it. Thanks for watching!
@@KirbyYoung thanks for quick response. I really like this watch with its mechanism, history and dimensions. I just hesitate about scratching the bezel. If i saw a few scratches on bezel, its actually deal breaker for me. In short, i couldnt find any seiko diver with ceramic bezel on 39-41 mm diameter...
@@fakerfaker5396 it does sound kind of hard to find a seiko with ceramic bezel at that size. Maybe the sla017 or the new sje093.
@@KirbyYoung both of them are way over my budget :) ty
Great review. Could I know your wrist size and width? I was worried about the lug to lug on my tiny wrist, but it looks very good on yours. Cheers
You'd be surprised, my wrist size is 6.35in. This watch wears excellent indeed! Thank you for watching.
Great watch. I love my SLA043
Thank you! That watch is excellent! SLA's are unbeatable, in my opinion.
I own many divers and often consider impulse buying this one. Maybe.... One day... we shall see...
Have you seen this watch personally? On the internet, it did not catch my attention. But after seeing it on the shelves of a local seiko ad. It looked perfect. Anyway, I hope you get one soon. Thanks for watching.
@@KirbyYoung Actually have. I tried several on wrist. 1 of the 3 had a misaligned bezel. I love the way it looks but.... my only concern is that I don't think it'll get the wrist time it deserves. How comfortable do you find it? What other watches do you have in your collection that this competes wrist time for?
@JC if you do have a lot of watches. It may be difficult to designate wrist time. I have an SLA and an LX and some others too. Here's the competition. th-cam.com/video/h1hDdzJGjRs/w-d-xo.html
@@KirbyYoung Going to watch now! Just off the top, yeah you have too many as well! LOL. SPB143 getting the most wrist time?
Yeah... I have more than I need. For sure...
@JC Yep that is a lot. 😁It's on the top 3. I usually switch between watches in a day. The spb143 is a rather all around choice. And dont really fear giving it a ding or two.
Nice job Kirby! 143 is a masterpiece.
That is right Gethin! And the main reason why some of my watches have been let go. Just complete versatility.
What about the weight, ive heard if you wear it with metal bracelet for long then with huge weight, it'll be uncomfortable.
Not at all. Weighs less than 160g resized links. Comfortable during long days.
I wear it on a strap. Probably my favorite watch of my 12 including Omega, Rolex, IWC, Longines, other seikos,......
What kind of strap, if I may ask? I'm still finding what fits or feels good on this watch.
@@KirbyYoung I've used Barton elite silicone, fine Steel mesh, fkm rubber. Barton canvas. All work well for me.
Wrist size?
6.5 in.
If you don't like it ill have it.
I don't like it..... I love it.
i dont like the indices, it just looks very unrefined.
Junk watch. Junk movement. 100% waste of money
Yeah the movement is horrible. Mine is averaging +0.6sec/day. What a junk🙄
Junk comment😂
Downvoted. Get to the point faster.