Mr. Sibal, I am a student of Law, I really follow your oral arguments, specially in Article 370, although I don't support your ideology or argument, but I have to say you have an appreciable skill of argument The question which you has made, being a citizen of this country I want to answer, the answer is as follows First thing, constitution doesn't fail in 2024, it's the supreme Law of the land, and we are still govern by it But its fails in 1971 not in 2024 Second, Law is an instrument to govern or control the external behaviour of human beings And Constitution is to govern the external and internal behaviour of the fundamental institutions of the state If institutions or organs of the state fails then is the fault of the Law, because law is made for governance, because it's doesn't achieve it's goal i.e. governance The reason behind this answer is the law must observe it's functions and the behaviour of it's subject Effective and successful laws are never made its always found and made in juncture Lastly, its the only option we have i.e. evaluate the law If today a law fails us then after such chaos we have to evaluate the law considering the reasons for such failure and precautions thereof Conclusively, Constitution doesn't fail today, but it failed in past, and the reason for such failure as per my analysis, was not having pure supremacy of Law on that time. And if it failed then the sole reason will be not evolution with time to time basis (except in case where the Law is, "Ought to be the Law".)
Human psychology works in a way that it is much easier to engage masses on divisive and hate agenda. But Karti is correct that Congress doesn't have the type of structure which the scores of umbrella organizations that BJP has on it's side to spread their political agenda irrespective of the fact whether it is good or bad.
Constitution may be all good in books.. but when it comes to implementation its woefully a failure... Take the case of Manipur.. they are playing politics.. and in Manipur's case, the constitution has failed us... Ideally in such a situation the constitution must take precedence over politics. But no.
How do these respected judges calmly talk with Kapil Sibal , it baffles me! He was shamelessly defending the wb govt in the RG KAR RAPE AND MURDER case. And now he lectures about the constitution! The irony man!
Good to see.. these people are crying, 😂, secondly these Money hesit Bloody Lawyers are the one who help those corrupt politician and officers. So, getting knowledge from a lawyer about morale obligation must be the last thing to do. 😂
I don't know when the people of this nation will awake from their slumber.
Nmaste 🎉all are the guiding light members of constitution
Constitution has given balance of power executive judiciary and politicians have to think where is India and where want to take
Mr. Sibal, I am a student of Law, I really follow your oral arguments, specially in Article 370, although I don't support your ideology or argument, but I have to say you have an appreciable skill of argument
The question which you has made, being a citizen of this country I want to answer, the answer is as follows
First thing, constitution doesn't fail in 2024, it's the supreme Law of the land, and we are still govern by it
But its fails in 1971 not in 2024
Second, Law is an instrument to govern or control the external behaviour of human beings
And Constitution is to govern the external and internal behaviour of the fundamental institutions of the state
If institutions or organs of the state fails then is the fault of the Law, because law is made for governance, because it's doesn't achieve it's goal i.e. governance
The reason behind this answer is the law must observe it's functions and the behaviour of it's subject
Effective and successful laws are never made its always found and made in juncture
Lastly, its the only option we have i.e. evaluate the law
If today a law fails us then after such chaos we have to evaluate the law considering the reasons for such failure and precautions thereof
Conclusively, Constitution doesn't fail today, but it failed in past, and the reason for such failure as per my analysis, was not having pure supremacy of Law on that time.
And if it failed then the sole reason will be not evolution with time to time basis (except in case where the Law is, "Ought to be the Law".)
😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
Foolish 🙄
51:34
15:20
Judges should be independent.
Sadly it's not true today.
I lost the Hope from Judiciary.
We can discuss these matters in a close room's, but can't do anything, all are hopeless. What will be destiny of the poor nation.
Human psychology works in a way that it is much easier to engage masses on divisive and hate agenda. But Karti is correct that Congress doesn't have the type of structure which the scores of umbrella organizations that BJP has on it's side to spread their political agenda irrespective of the fact whether it is good or bad.
RSS and BJP on its end Modi doing it
Constitution may be all good in books.. but when it comes to implementation its woefully a failure... Take the case of Manipur.. they are playing politics.. and in Manipur's case, the constitution has failed us... Ideally in such a situation the constitution must take precedence over politics. But no.
Supreme court ban west bengal religion based reservation petition but congress gave at their state!
The ruling has made ot tofail the cpnstition absolutely
All black coats. Congressi proxies in judiciary.
Why kapil sibal in favour of 370 at Kashmir but against sc st obc reservation in Kashmir aligarh and jamia university at supreme court!
I understand your views and appreciate them in toto.
But I still feel you don't have discussion with stake holders on everything you said.
Sad I find Kapil Sibal should be be more articulative and forthright in his dialogues
Why kapil sibal always against hindus from ram mandir to religion based reservation!
Vivekana never said hindu mulim jai esai etc but his word in bengali ohe bharat basi. AHE = HELLOW.
How do these respected judges calmly talk with Kapil Sibal , it baffles me! He was shamelessly defending the wb govt in the RG KAR RAPE AND MURDER case. And now he lectures about the constitution! The irony man!
Why kapil sibal always fight for separatist, against sc st obc reservation in Kashmir aligarh and jamia university
BR Ambedkar always against wakf board to religion based reservation but congress gave against constitution!
Ambedkar was against 370
Sir, don't want to hear you. You are crying
१९४७ से पहले जो व्यवस्था थी वैसेही रखने का unwriten agriment शायद किया था । भारतीय व्यवस्था संविधान से कभी चली ही नहीं।
🤔
Kalyan haha joker
Good to see.. these people are crying, 😂, secondly these Money hesit Bloody Lawyers are the one who help those corrupt politician and officers.
So, getting knowledge from a lawyer about morale obligation must be the last thing to do. 😂