The fate of Villedor (ALL Endings Survivors/Peacekeeprs/Renegades/Destroyed) - Dying Light 2
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- Depending on which faction you support(peacekeepers, survivors, renegades) Villedor will be ruled by one of them in the end, and it will change how people in it will be treated.
--------- Monthly giveaway: February 2022
I am giving away every month a game on a platform of your choosing. Here is how to enter: gleam.io/Z3qBj... ... If you are watching this video after February 2022 just check the community tab for the latest giveaway.
Enjoy.
Let's Chat:
Facebook: / mighty2noob
Instagram: / mighty2noob
Twitter: / mighty2noob
TikTok: / mighty2noob
Twitch: / mighty2noob
All videos recorded and edited by me, with the intent to provide educational/entertainment value.
Survivors:
Peacekeepers: “Six people died last night”
Renegades: “Forty people died last night”
Destroyed: Most people died because of the missiles
Did you miss the part where the survivors said not everyone made it last night? They don’t have enough fighters to keep the streets safe and people die every day
@@Tate_THG My main point was that survivors is the best faction to support.
However, ‘Herald’ didn’t specify the amount of people which ‘weren’t so lucky’ and whether they actually did die or not.
The Survivors only faction wo dont name the number of people died .
My answer on this I cant trust them .
Hell even the fucking Renegedes name the number of dead
@@oldschoolgaming1-y9q No offense, but dude... You know how ridiculous and paranoid that sounds, right?
@@savchilla2464 its not paranoia I dont care what are he saying if he lying in a point of view .
I wanted in the ending a simple ting for trusting the survivals but that much sweetening I cant trust them
Man, it feels so obvious who they want you to side with.
Its even weirder because objectively your character achieves nothing in the city besides stoping some missiles and making sure the city stays in a state of survival of the fittest.
I personally dont understand how thats the good ending even with the nudging that they do. With the PKs you get a cleared city and a implied amount of rations given to you (with shortages but its the apocalypse watcha gonna do) along with a actual organized front against the infected. If they are unable to take more territory out side the walls (im sure they could) they could at least keep the infected out.
I always go PK because survivors are going to either remain a stable part of the infected food chain or they will just slowly be picked off to extinction like everywhere else. The simple fact that they cant clear the city is a big dealer breaker for me. The amount of doors a cleared out city opens for humanity is to many for us to just throw it away
I always hated that about this game. Like, sorry, but with the surviviors in control there would absolutely be way more chaos than this and the PKs I don't see just murdering thousands of people.
"The free folk led by the nigthrunners control the city and the city prevails."
The nigthrunners taking care of the city and protecting the citizens seems like the best outcome to me.
@@JohnDonovanYT because the game makes it obvious. When this game was marketed it was going to be this huge open ended type of game but it winds up boiling down realistically to a couple choices max
@@bigbeezy5056 I dont see how is obvious. The game doesn't tell that you can revive the nightrunners and bring them back we learn about them during the game and how they helped the city and protect the citzens but we also learn how they got wipe ou and the others nightrunners quit, I went with the PKs originally but Jack turned out to be a sociopath acting like a dictator. He killed all those innocent people back in the day and put the blame on Williams. I didnt know that giving the VNC tower to Frank was the way to resurrect the nightrunners.
The only problem I have with this game is how they treat the peacekeepers they act like their the worst and are a tyrannical government even though they acknowledge things like low water supply and kill zombies instead of avoiding them
well the thing is, they keep all the water for themselves and not for the others. you can see this by visiting sinks and bathrooms in zones that survivors or peacekeepers hold. in a survivors zones, there is water running down in the sinks and such, but in peacekeeper zones there is none.
@@M3CH1Ethey ration it instead of just using a valuable ressource for no reason
If you see the ending the peacekeepers deal it out to the people as a ration because it is so scarce, the survivors will run out faster
Throughout the entire game they try to broker a peace between survivors and themselves, they show up to protect the survivors from renegades, kill zombies and try to regain territory for humanity. Then you beat the game siding with them and the games like “jk they’re power crazed dictators.”
j
@@RockyLXXXVIIImost of the ppl that were killed in the cutscene were renegades
The survivor's first instinct was to lynch me and backstab me multiple times whilst all the PKs I met were actually friendly so of course I chose the PKs
Except that was specifically Carl's people who tried to hang you, not Frank's.
Yeh gave me the worse ending lol.
@@G8oo8N8 Well, those 6 dead were thieves and Renegades. I feel sorry for some of the thieves out of those 6 because they're not total thieves, they're just surviving, they haven't really adapted to having PK rule the entire city. Basically PK is like North Korea, self-sufficient, but I think a dictatorship like PK will be better than Survivor when PK helps to keep the society peaceful and orderly. especially in the chaotic post-apocalyptic period, Survivor helps people to be free, but because of that, it will make it even harder for us to return to the society before the zombie outbreak. Of course, it will not be as dictatorial and sick as Renegades, Renegades is like the dark Middle Ages, the people are poor, but the nobles still have fun. Choose PK, although people are not very free, but basically they still have human rights, as long as they don't steal or do anything that affects society. PK will distribute food and water to people, make sure they work and keep society in order, they can even provide good education. PK soldiers are very good at killing Zom, they can free the whole city and rebuild. Remember that guns still exist in the DL2 universe, it's just that the army has taken all the weapons out of the city. If there are still Pilgrims like Aiden visiting the city, then surely PK will get the guns back, they can even build it.
@@staliniosifvissarionovich5588 the PKS a we’re good at the start but after the VNC tower it seemed clear that the survivors are actually the best, and then jack Matt almost kills frank and it becomes clear as day that the PKs are almost as bad as the renegades, survivors turn out to be the best
@@crazygamingyt7245 In fact, the PK is like a dictatorship, if it has to be said fascist. They are a combination of Renegades and Survivors. They have the brutality of Renegades but the civilization and discipline of the Survivors. I'm not going to side with the Renegades because they look like psychopaths and barely help me. I can also choose Survivors when they have a lot of tools to parkour. But in the zombie world, I think I will choose the side of PK because they often set traps everywhere to fight zombies, and they also have quite a lot of places where I can go and hide from zombies.
I like the peacekeepers better they might not be perfect but the survivors ending just feels to perfect and good hoping the dlcs will fix that to make the survivors more grey
I like the peace keppers but hate Jack Matt
I think the Survivors show perfectly well why its still a grey area.
Zombies still lurk everywhere. They dont fight them and just pretend they can hide forever
The survivors/nigthrunners ending seems really good to me. I don't see any problems.
@@JohnDonovanYT You don't think it's a problem that there are many infected still roaming the streets, many who die in the night, and the fact that a bunch of people need to rely on charity to survive?
@@dutchpatriot17 How exactly they supposed to exterminate every single zombie in the city? No one can do that, they have high walls, safe roof tops and UV lights for a reason. With the nightrunners in control the city has high chance of survival and move foward.
They make the peacekeepers seem way too evil especially with the “death of their entire family remark” they really make them be like evil tyrants in this game for no reason when every pk I even met was actually friendly and trustable in this game but the survivors literally backstab and do us dirty so many times it really makes no sense💀
Its a military dictatorship yo
I remember a random encounter with a horde coming in on PK soldiers with a woman yelling at them something along the lines of "I don't need your help, I'll make it on my own" and the soldier replied "God dammit lady, you need medical attention, we're getting you out of here." Also notice how in both renegade and pk ending. Despite them being portrayed bad options... tell me, what're they on the streets unlike the survivor ending? That's right. Even the junkies combined with the "bright peacekeepers" could clean out the streets enough that traveling on ground level is acceptable and notice how a lot of characters are in doors not covered in UV light. Survivors look good only because they pushed problems under the rug. They look like a utopia purely because they burn resources. Every other ending rationing is needed but magically the survivor ending is full of supplies? No, just as the infected still roam the streets in their ending, they're still going to run out of food because they never fixed the problem.
El problema no es la Infanteria individual de los PK , el problema es su lider
Tan solo dale un vistazo a la vida real en Corea del Norte, que al menos para mi es logico que haya pasado ese final con los PK
I want them to expand on the Renegades letting you take territories for them actually being on their side and the other factions hating you and fighting you for them
Right?? Like sure the renegades are bad people but if it's a rpg then I should have the choice of an evil route
@@itsmrbigsmoke862I saw an article that asked about Dying Light 3 and they said that they have 5 years of updates planned for Dying Light 2. I wouldn't keep my hopes to high, but maybe they will add something like that (kinda hard without altering the story somehow) but either way you can expect more additions and changes to the game over the next couple years
@@johns3241 if you think about it i think the only renegates that are bad are those drugged by waltz
@@johns3241 maybe a bandit route?
i litterally got the worse ending on my first run.
i fucking destoryed the city and i left alone
Yep
Same dw
Me too😅😂
Same bro
Same here. I'm really thinking about replaying since I hate the smoke and I can't use some lifts.
Note in PK ending the streets are cleared (albeit ruled by an iron fist). In Juan ending, there's a party/nightclub for the elites (while the common folk starve). Survivor ending is anarchy, reliant on charity.
I don't give the tower to Matt, because I don't like the idea of propaganda spam replacing genuine warnings to the common folk of the missiles. But I still hold that PK is the "good" faction in all this. Survivors come across as literal communists, anarchists and other ne'er-do-wells who resort to terrorism from the get go. Almost every quest they give has lies and double-crossers (poisoned water, lying family members, dog hunters, plaster in the flour... it's endless)
Perfectly said
Les not forget they tried to hang our boi aiden the moment he came into villedor nah pk,s for the giant W
feels like they missed an opportunity to make multiple endings to the factions. peacekeepers take control but juan and jack matt are ousted in favor of aitor, survivor's take control but led by the bazaar etc.
@@andreacellman5482Because Matt was behind Frank's death
I mean Im probably a bit biased considering my name, but objectively they were not just ne'er-do-wells as you say. They were the average people trying to survive this horrible apocalypse. And they were objectively more important than military men. When you have people, who lets say, know how to do surgeries or help maintain water treatment plants versus someone who, In all honesty, can shoot a gun, and are fascist. They impose everything under martial law while suspending all rights to protest. They kill people for water and launch an attack on the bazaar, neither side is completely innocent in this. But bootlicking even in video games is wild
Kinda hate how they make the other 2 faction endings that arent the survivors "bad"
I mean one of those factions are a literal bandit camp so not unrealistic
its not out of line
Pk is litteraly a tiking bomb and in old viledor it was visible how they threat pepole who oppose them when they did a genoside on bazar or mercylessly tortured alberto
Renegates are bandits and while coloner isn't esentialy a bad guy he is a former world leader
yeah it kinda sucks that survivors are only good ending but it fits the narrative
I think PK are actually right with water tower. You see, the water tower have limited water supplies, so, PK are rationing them and distribute it to people in appropriate numbers so that the supplies do not run out quickly. The same is done by the renegades. The survivors on the other hand, give away and trade as much water as they can, and probably after a few months their supplies would run out. The PK have also more experience in combat than the survivors, and if we support them and give them radio tower, they also become the strongest. In my opinion, they make much more sense, it's a pity that Techland presented them this way, and made the renegades the canonical ending (but as far as i know, now it's player choice which one is the canon one, so i think that PK would be it).
Look at renegates ending: there is no zombies
I always feel compelled to side with those who align with order like the peacekeepers. I prefer the idea of returning to the way society used to be than accepting the new world we’re forced to live in. Even if some people have to die for that to happen.
Does survivor not have the same idea?
@@SquidCena Survivors don't really try to reclaim the city, they just build on rooftops and hide from the infected. The Peacekeepers confront the infected head-on, building watchtowers and barricades, and sending out patrols to kill any infected.
@@SquidCena the survivors are lawless
@@SquidCena
Survivors are more caring and flexible, preferring to work around the problem rather than confront it head-on. Peacekeepers are simple and straightforward, brutal and closed-minded, but very effective and organized.
@@sigmamale7804 survivors at the end of the game are very organized and can protect themselves especially with the night runners, PKs are good but jack Matt is a killer if jack Matt wasn’t the leader the PKs would be better but remember jack Matt killed innocent people and tried to kill frank so what kind of leader is that? The survivors are the better option
Peacekeepers are the only good "government" (you know what I want to say) faction in recent games. In most cases they are tyrants, corrupted or incompetent but in DL2 they are good which is refreshing
Yea I beleive the Bible talks about how good and Christian it is to hang entire families suspected of crimes.
Yea I beleive the Bible talks about how good and Christian it is to hang entire families of people suspected of crimes.
you got a point but the commander and jack matt is evil
@@jackiewest351 he dies no matter what ending so u know the person who takes over will do whats right
@@neowolf09 didn’t they literally stone people for adultery in the Old Testament?
Their are deadly monsters and Renegades everywhere in Villedor, The "Survivors" outright ignore them and do their best to avoid an conflict with them.
The Peacekeepers fight back against all the Monsters and the Renegades in Villedor. Remember the attack on the canteen? The Peacekeepers had to come save everyone cause they could barely defend themselves and even let themselves be attack in the first place.
Bro the PKs came after Aiden took care of everything. The PK's job is to protect the survivors, which they failed to do so. If Aiden wasn't there everyone would've died, so the PKs can't do their own job. They require Aiden to do 90% of the work I their playthrough, despite being a literal army.
The survivors do fight the Renegades of they come within each other, so that isn't totally true. As for the deadly zombies everywhere, that's what we're here for
I like the vibes the survivor ending gives
Same man
They just work around the problem gangs and infected still rule the streets
we need order we need peace we need the peacekeeper
I actually, genuinely hated the PK ending of the game; I preferred the PK faction all throughout my first (full) playthrough. In old Villedor, Aitor and the PKs not only seemed genuinely interested in my wellbeing, but they were damn near civilised most of the time. But the Bazaar? They try to hang you when you first meet, their initial leader is a pious moron and their second leader, should you side with them, is too aggressive, hotheaded and overall too angry for the position. A good leader sits in the middle of the two extremes presented by Carl and Sophie, and that's where I always saw Aitor. And when you break into their compound, an action that can reasonably be seen as a threat, Anderson tries to coerce information out of you, but they never actually harm you. Whereas, putting aside the fact that Sophie's brother is an absolute psychopath regardless of what side you choose, if you do try and help them, they attack you simply for suspecting you of being a PK spy... with little to no evidence.
The PKs only truely show themselves to be bad in the same circumstances that the survivors show themselves to be bad; when you screw them over, or when they succumb to desperation. All throughout my time after leaving Old Villador, I sided with the PKs out of principle: I give them the first substation because that's what Aiden agreed to do when he meets the PKs there. I give them the VNC radio because so many genuinely good soldiers, who Aiden counted amongst his friends, died to help get him there. How could I let them die in vain? And for what? So some drunk asshole living in a dive bar can get his own personal radio station? In return for... suggesting that there may be a grappling hook nearby? Assuming you don't have the foresight of having already played the game - ergo, if you were in Aiden's position - it always seems like the most reasonable decisions are to side with the PKs, at least from my standpoint. Don't get me wrong, I would align myself with socialist ideals... in a world in which I am safe! But if it's between rooftop huts or military outposts in a world otherwise run by infected freaks and Renegades, it's a no brainer to me. The PKs also create food, they also provide education - I'd wager a much high education - and they also house people. Sure, your lot is much better if you actually join the PKs, but it's not like the survivors are freely providing for people outside their communities either.
I feel no obligation to help the 'free people' over the PKs; if you work with the PKs you quickly see that they are not much fewer in number than the survivors themselves. And I'd rather the PKs have control than... 'the people'? The people meaning either psycho Sophie and drunk Frankie or nobody at all; anarchy.
Provided that you side with the PKs, the faction is in the moral blue at the best of times and in the dark grey at worst. But then, after all that, once Jack Matt dies and Meyers takes over, all that ambiguity is thrown away to make them basic tyrants. I mean, I'd rather law with harsh punishments over lawlessness, but Meyers never seemed so unreasonable when we knew her in game. Though in saying that, when the Bazaar was tough on water they dropped a windmill on top of a PK outpost and left potentially hundreds of soldiers to die in the main base at Old Villedor.
Now, granted, I haven't got far enough yet in my (second attempt at a) Survivor faction playthrough to really experience the PKs as a potentially antagonistic faction, so I may well come back one day having seen the other side of the coin and revoke some statements, but at the moment I'm fairly certain that I won't.
Edit: So I just finished my Survivor playthrough and my opinions haven't changed all that much. It was nice to see Frank get back on his feet and - having spared Hakon - I got to see the Survivor cast get their happy endings... but honestly, I still don't see what kind of a chance this new world has.
Seeing Jack Matt lose his shit at the end of the story didn't surprise me; the man was dying of cancer and watching all his hopes, dreams and aspirations go down the drain because of Aiden and Frank; if anything, it's a testament to the PK soldiers present that they saw what he'd become and relieved him of command. Still, what remains of the PK under Juan's leadership isn't really the PK anymore.
With all that in mind, I still believe that the Peacekeepers offer a safer and overall better Villedor than the Survivor factions do; especially in a world with rapidly mutating infected.
And for reasons I can't really articulate, running around Villedor feels a fair bit safer with towering blue outposts all over the place and Peacekeeper soldier all around to battle infected, as opposed to ramshackle farms and roaming scavengers.
And even as far as practical rewards go, I think the PKs offer a better deal. Survivor rewards offer parkor shortcuts which become obsolete as you upgrade your nightrunner parkor tools and get all your parkor skills, whereas PK rewards offer fun traps on the ground that have genuinely helped me in a pinch at night, and are fun to play around with during the day.
Not to mention, of course, the blessed PK crossbow.
I honestly, completely agree with this. PK FOR LIFE!!!
I really enjoyed reading this dude, thanks!
What's your opinion on the Nightrunners return in the survivor ending? And Williams surviving?
PKs also had better characters, Anderson actually becoming helpful when you get trapped in the tunnels, Rowe and his squad, the Resident Evil reference characters, Aglot and Nitaf, and of course Aitor my beloved
I think I made a mistake in giving the VNC tower to Frank. My reasoning was that I recently discovered that Jack Matt was responsible for not evacuating Villadore during the chemical bombings and so Williams was innocent (to a degree) and was wrongfully called "the Butcher". So I looked it up and saw that you could avoid killing Williams and also give the tower to Frank which would thus replace Jack Matt with Meyers. I did this in order to shortcut Jack Matt's sociopathism. However, apparently the game endings are utter shit and don't accurately represent the power dynamic left from these choices, so because of my choices (keep in mind the map is almost blue), I will probably get the terrible Survivor ending. Also it seems to me like there is a massive bias in favour of the Survivors faction in all things. I mean, why would the Nightrunners represent the Survivors when they were the middle way between PKs and the people back in the day and they also collaborated with the PKs? It seems like the developers are trying their hardest to make the Survivors a viable, fun and morally upright faction but it just doesn't work.
It seems that most people support Peacekeepers...
Great job! I am proud for people not falling into that sunshine happy ending and empty phrases about making better society while watching people die by hunger and bandits like in Bazaar. Peacekeepers are the best!
Definitely the most logical.
Most favorite peacekeaper ending 🤝
That's the bad ending
You like the bad ending then you military cuk
@@Canadianbacon-s9n you just said that your most favourite was the peacekeeper ending and I pointed out that that was the bad ending
@@mchael3083 Cameron didn't say that buddy. He was responding to the same person you were.
@@squidbad they have the same pfp got confused
I support PK tho!! cause they maintain the laws nd they have the potential to govern or rule the entire city with safer hands than..the renegades or survivours etc..
Screw governments
100% pk all the way 💪
pk top tier
Exactly my friends don't understand that. The survivors ending is so unrealistic.
@@seanspeltwrong4402 u have to change ur frnd..XD XD
Survivors : natural good
Peacekeeprs : lawful evil
Renegades : chaotic evil
Destroyed : natural evil
Personally I’d definitely align with the Peacekeepers because their an organised military faction. And the fact that they just wanna kill the infected and restore order.
@@novacore2116 same , they maybe kill people but there're allways a reason for it
If you follow the rule then you will live in peace
Who do you support the renegades?
@@pichanao1069 yeah that’s true they give people the death sentence if they break laws
@@novacore2116 Yeah, and their ENTIRE FAMILY. There is nothing more unjust than punishment to the innocent.
I did the survivors ending first, now in ng+ I'll do the peacekeepers
I found the survivors or the free folks good, bazaar people I found insane alittle and is too pacifist… so I went for straight PK just to fall under Juan’s trap…
AYO SAMEEE WHICH LEADS ME TO BAD ENDING JUAN IS FUCKING STUPID
I wish that instead of Jack Matt, Aitor took the position of commander
I kinda like that no matter who takes control theres still major flaws in each.
I support Renegades it is one of the most anarchy moments to the city of Villedor
Devs:noooo you have to side with the survivors, they’re the good people!!
My honest reaction: NUH renegades 🗿
In my opinion PK ending is the best,why? Because they get rid of zombies and want the streets to be clean. And finally maybe they will succed at killing all zombies in city and making you walk on sidewalk instead of 25m roof
Honestly, I chose Bright Peacekeepers (it isn't the Renegade ending, its the Bright Peacekeepers ending). Just because they have the same flag doesn't mean they're the same. My reason? Purely a RP perspective. Juan is the route youd go if you're playing as an Aiden that only cares about finding Mia, and doesn't care about the city. He is the best option for finding Mia, from an RP perspective.
As person who chooses the nightrunner ending every time, i just want to say that i support the Bazaarians and the PKs.
I support Peacekeepers
Same
I thought I was doing survivor ending and got renegade ending lol
I wish the survivors took a more active approach with the zombies, but there's definitely something people forget. The PK's are objectively bad, its not like they were ever supposed to be saviors. They are military men for the most part, and even try to sabotage every faction. On the other hand, the survivors enlist a more democratic approach. I imagine that, because they have more of the everyday people AND the nightrunners, they are able to clean out small and important areas. I imagine this could lead to water treatment plants and solar energy farms after years. Theres also rain and well water that they could have! Its kinda funny to assume that the survivors dont have these very important everyday workers, which is more important that just pure force and military.
You can really taste the biased towards the survivors coming from Techland
Portraying the PK ending as some sort of "bad ending" is just stupid
Not nearly as stupid as their reasoning for the virus getting out and infecting the entire planet, but still stupid
Well, they completely cleared streets and they are rationing, but there are probably two options. Either Peacekeepers have for some reason less water than Survivors in their ending, which seems like a bias against PKs, but if we expect that in their respective endings both Peacekeepers and Survivors have same amount of water and PKs still chose rations while Survivors just give everyone whatever they need even if everyone is honest and doesn´t act selfishly (which isn´t probable...) it still means that Survivors will run out of those supplies, especially water, pretty soon, while PKs will have it for long time thanks to considering their limited supply of it and rationing it from the start, which would make them in this ending much smarter than Survivors.
Unless we take Survivors as some geniuses who somehow magically and very drastically improved their situation and solved all their problems they are probably quite screwed no matter how utopian does that ending seems to make them look.
Kinda seems like the peacekeepers should have a better ending, since, aside from Juan, they were reasonable folk, while the survivors seemed like a bunch of petulant children. While Frank does get his shit together eventually if you side with him, and you can give Lawan and Hakon peace in their conflict, the survivors faction as a whole seems whack
what does a basicallz reasonable folk change if the whole political system is basically a military dictatorship?
The Survivors felt more like people who just didn’t like how restrictions (protective or otherwise) to their lives were put in place and went against The Peacekeepers, while the peacekeepers feel a bit too totalitarian and bureaucratic to be trusted with owning the entirety of Villedor. In the end I chose The Renegades, under the leadership of Juan Rainer, as they seemed to be the most neutral faction that knew what most was necessary for Villedor’s survival, even if they were the most morally ambiguous.
The endings are a lot like Fallout: New Vegas' endings. Survivors is the independent ending, PKs are the NCR route, Juan/renegades are the Legion/Mr. House route (because he is playing the PKs like Mr. House did with the NCR, and Legion because the city is in control of raiders).
Its because the story (although changed a lot) was written by Chris avellone aka the fallout writer
I went full pks and got survivor ending somehow
lmao what
When will they actually change how the city looks I want the city to actually look like one of these endings and which fraction room is the area more often That be interesting
PK ending is the best for the future. Only bad thing is the rule of killing the whole famaly and frank dies coz aiden dont ask Jack to warn people of missle attacks but call Frank to ask him
Bruh peacekeepers founded north Korea v2
Holy shit, I've never seen the survivors nor did I think u could support renegades
Destroying the city changes the map a lot ?? I have not seen videos of it
Itd be good to see
It doesn't change anything, after the credits when you play again you get a message saying that your choices didnt change anything in the map. (in order to be able to play again)
@@domingo2605 besides there being a shit ton of annoying smoke blocking your eyesight a bit.
PK is an example of Fascism because of their leader
The hanging scene looks like it came from the E3 version
How’d you side with renegades?
not entirely sure completely, but it involves working for juan, and giving the radio tower to him, instead of frank or matt. if you choose to work with him, you'll have to choose between frank and juan, instead of frank and matt, meaning you bug the transmitter, after giving it to matt. also you have to trust the colonel at the end. i think theres more to it than that, but i know you have to do those 3 things at the very least.
@@kylelm24 you also have to do the side quest deals with the devil before the veronica mission
The reason I side with PK because of Aitor, Rowe, The Razor Cannon & of course The Crossbow, the only A-hole thing is Jack Matts
I still don't regret choosing the PKs.
I support as a survivor. Live together and save together
-Speech of Pelaro
I would have gotten the renegades ending first play through if I didn’t decide to save lawan lmao-
thanks god i supported the Survivors and i saved the city
i think i got the best ending
I got the destroyed city ending. UGH lol
Renegate ending is definitivly the best ending, because I PARTY ON THE ROOFS with Juan 🚦🥳🥳🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 🚦
i wish there was another outcome cause i didnt side with the survivors and I betrayed Jack Matt but got the Survivor ending
I choosed Peacekeepers, because they are the only one who can basically build old world.
And survivors were so annoying.
And PK would clear the city from infected and care about city structures.
Survivors wouldn't care about city structures, so those buildings would collapse and their windmill utopia would collapse too.
In my opinion Peacekeepers ending is the best.
I like the city being destroyed 🥰
The perfect ending 😁 there shant be any city standing 💖
Fucking menace
Yeah all the zombies will die from starvation and then some random people in the wilderness living off from farming would be able to survive 10/10 ending
Volatile moment
Well, those 6 dead were thieves and Renegades. I feel sorry for some of the thieves out of those 6 because they're not total thieves, they're just surviving, they haven't really adapted to having PK rule the entire city. Basically PK is like North Korea, self-sufficient, but I think a dictatorship like PK will be better than Survivor when PK helps to keep the society peaceful and orderly. especially in the chaotic post-apocalyptic period, Survivor helps people to be free, but because of that, it will make it even harder for us to return to the society before the zombie outbreak. Of course, it will not be as dictatorial and sick as Renegades, Renegades is like the dark Middle Ages, the people are poor, but the nobles still have fun. Choose PK, although people are not very free, but basically they still have human rights, as long as they don't steal or do anything that affects society. PK will distribute food and water to people, make sure they work and keep society in order, they can even provide good education. PK soldiers are very good at killing Zom, they can free the whole city and rebuild. Remember that guns still exist in the DL2 universe, it's just that the army has taken all the weapons out of the city. If there are still Pilgrims like Aiden visiting the city, then surely PK will get the guns back, they can even build it.
PK might have dominating hand over surviving people but that's what you need at apocalypse an well organised government ready to defend and protect the last Humans yes they have flaws but you can't make an omelette without cracking egg's no matter witch side you choose it will be bad but in PK you can see the potential to restore the human race
I WISH THAT THE CITY WOULD CHANGE IT'S APPEREANCE BASED ON ENDING YOU GET, SADLY IT'S GOT SCRATCHED BACK IN 2020😢
Our literal first interaction with the survivors was them trying to hang us for being infected. While aitor as he saw i wasnt a treat literraly raised his hand to us. Why they are the bad giys and the survivors the good guys?
Crazy how people wanna support the pk when it’s being ruled by a terrible person. Like as if the pk wouldn’t of done worse to Aiden if he showed up to them mid turning plus who would support a man who let the best character (his own men) go on a suicide mission just to blow up minutes in and not give a crap about them. If someone else was in charge I would be pk all the way but when the head of the organization is corrupt the rest of it will be as well
Tf that night runner grappling onto?
So the survivors ending seems to be the best ending. No one dies, and everyone is surviving. The peacekeeper is ending seems to be more neutral ending people may have died, but yeah, but the renegades ending seems to be the bad ending two people died and there’s a bunch of protest and destroying all I’m gonna say is it’s the worst ending
I support the Survivors from beginning to end. They believe in community and freedom. Freedom from oppression, totalitarianism, manipulation, neglect, abuse, and greed. They believed in human rights. They also believed in rules and retribution, but not through control, dominance, or hierarchy.
Concerning what Aitor said about being an equal and a leader is false, he had it wrong. A true leader is one who upholds and teaches those values to be an example without asking anything more in return. Unlike a ruler or a boss.
The PK call themselves “righteous protectors.” But if they were, why did they leave the Bazzar suffering at the hands of Jack and Joe? Why didn’t they extend a helping hand to convince the Bazzarians they were the good guys? Why did they take too much from the people while leaving them with too little? Why did they judge the Bazzarians as a whole at the beginning over the actions of one man (Hakon)?
Also, the audio tapes from the GRE, VNC News, and the Renegades confirm that like the Army before them, the PKs (and Renegades) are collectively a bunch of grunts who follow orders no matter what. This led to events like Black Monday. And lastly, they are controlled by someone who is power hungry or with agendas that can change for the worse if they wanted to.
I hope some can see this too after they played this game many times. Also, the Survivors’ rewards are much more helpful when avoiding the Volatiles during a chase in Hard Mode, navigating the city, and avoiding crowds of infected and Special Infected when low on health.
Ok ok...but hold on...now there are protest...on the middle of stress...at freaking NIGHT?
Did the renegados killed all the zombies? Because so then they are THE only right choice
Yo,you are right, like where are volatiles?
I somehow got the renegade ending despite giving the entire city to the peace keepers, I hated Juan and only sided with him once because frank was pissing me off and jack could not be trusted and somehow he took the entire city by one single decision I made half way into the game…
From Good to Horrible
my first run was true ending and i didnt know what i was choosing.
The survivor and renegade ending feel far too fragile. Survivor obviously everything is just great but it feels like a sudden gust of wind could top it all. The renegades are obviously falling apart at the seams. Only the peacekeeper really look like they have order and laws. They are harsh, but in a world like dying light harshness is required
0:55 is that a kid hanging ?
Yeah ikr
Kinda the peacekeepers ending is the Dying light 2019 i was hoping for
I'm not buying this game's propaganda, the Pecekeepers are actually maintaining steady rationing, eliminating zombies and enforcing order the medieval way. This isn't our society anymore, it's a new Dark Age.
How are you supposed to get the renagade ending?
I really can't understand why the Peacekeepers are seen as a bad ending while the Survivor's as a good ending. 🤦♂️
Survivors are also a bad ending IMO. Sophie's leadership won't help bazaar "thrive" when zombies aren't being killed. How many "loved ones" actually died under Survivors? W PK's!
Pk to moim najlepszy ending, oni chcą się pozbyć wszystkich zarażonych z miasta i je oczyścić a inne frakcje poprostu to ignorują że największym problemem są zombie, a pk chce je wszystkie wybić i nawet chyba im sie udało w tym zakończeniu
How did they even climb the tower with that big banner?
How is the Fish Eye still standing in the worst ending? Both Old Villedor and Central Loop got completely destroyed, they were nuclear missiles.
Not nuclear, ballistic
Conventional Warheads are just regular explosives inside of a missile so it would not be nuclear
Got the best ending first try!
How do you get the renegade ending
For as amazing of an experience this was playing thru 3 times, i have never played a more BROKEN game from high end developers......... (I had to play thru 3 times because of glitched trophies and bugged missions or side quests) and currently in 2024 its still just as BROKEN... Still a great experience that i would definitely recommend but man how much better could it have been without all the issues...
these factions ending seem like a remnant to the original factions of the 2018-19 version, the endings do not represent at all how these factions behaved in the storyline.
I fucking got the renegades my first try.
PK ending is the best
I just got the PK ending and I’m pissed off
I support the survivors. city this better.
Who was the guy that grappled away can't be adin
Pretty terrible writing in terms of the ending:
1. The Survivors faction was awful right from the get go but their ending supposedly shows a good outcome? That whole things makes no sense. I didn't see anything indicating that for example they'd build soup kitchens (also making people reliable on handouts...)
2. The Peacekeepers were reasonable from the start and had only a few idiots in it (Jack Matt). How you get from that to "we kill your family as well if you break the law" is beyond me. Also punishing confirmed thieves is good. The ending shown here is not consistent with what is experiences while playing the game...
3. The pure idea that siding with Juan is siding with the Renegades also makes no sense. I would never hand over the keys to the city to a bunch of thugs that run around with masks constantly attacking and killing people. Up to the point where you meet Williams there wasn't a single Renegade that you could even properly talk to and that wasn't a generic crazy a-hole. There were two side quests with supposedly "new" renegade members but what they said made no sense and was not consistent with the behavior of the generic renegade enemies seen.
Juan made it clear he was on the Colonels side the entire game. The PK were always strict like that hell they even hang Juan in front of everyone. The survivors ending is weird tho. The streets are filled with infected but since they have soup kitchens and community everything is good? Makes no sense. For my fifth playthrough after getting all the other endings, I'm giving all facilities but one to PK to make city as secure as possible but give tower to Frank. The survivors would be dead without the PK. Period. They're always helping them also but the survivors are dicks to everyone and can't even kill infected. They just run
I agree on the PK one. Why kill a whole family if one of the family member break one of the PK's law? It doesn't make any sense. Human population is at the brink of extinction. If one too many break the law. Eventually they're going to run out of civilians, which civilians is important in any civilization as they help bring in the productivity.
@@tribaloutcaster2318Maybe it was because they had too much power that caused them to fall into a dictatorial government
@@MinhNguyen-hz2zn You're right. Too much power in the head causes them to be blindly delusional brutal/complete tyrant with no real logic and rational thinking.
What ending will I get if I give the tower to Matt, save Mia and there is no one left to take over villedor? If Matt is dead there is no peace keeper ending, if frank is dead there is no survivor ending and if Juan is dead there is no renegade ending but if I let Lawan detonate the bombs what ending do I get?
The ending depends of whoever takes control of the radio tower, If you give it to Matt and let Lawan detonate the missiles, you'll get the PK ending.
That’s exactly what happened when I finished the game
Why doesn't the map look like this! missed opertunity
None of this endings feels satisfying, even the survivor ones is as bland as tap water.
The whole soup kitchens stuff is nonsense
Are little kids really debating which factions is better? Many of you wouldn't even survive with the PK.
Is it a bout facilities and factions
surivors: somewhat good ending true but they life in fear of zombies and just don't wipe out the zombies witch means more deaths
peacekeeprs: i say they more of a nautral ending true some people died but they died bc they did something bad like water trieff and other stuff the innocent are safe and PK wipes out the zombies in the city effectivly saveing more people from zombies
renegades: we can all say it's a bad ending they treat people like trash berly gives any water and are bad
destroyed: worst ending nothing to say more if u like it u are a sadist (i kinda like it bc i am one to)
in my opinion PK are the best ending true they somewhat are tyrans and set stirct rules but they eventually make city the last city standing safer by killing all zombies in it also strict rules are needed when apocalypse happens i mean survivors are also one way but people are still dying they life in shadows and wait for god knows if u help PK they set a lot of traps for zombies that are we can say effective while survivors help is giveing u new ways of transport and not going to ground so i stay with PK
Pk are the good guys I mean Sophie literally tried to kill you
I supported the renegades lol
Destroy everyone is the only good ending
I when for the peacekeeper ending
Anarchocapitalism is the best.
Why is the survivors acting like North Korea with that execute the whole family BS