Monster magnet meets flames...

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
  • A candle flame behaves oddly near a powerful magnet? What is this? Let's look into it...
    This video is sponsored by brilliant.org/...
    50 mm sphere magnets and 200x50 mm disc magnet donated by: www.magnetport...
    My Patreon-page: / brainiac75
    Did you miss one of my videos?: / brainiac75
    FULL MUSIC CREDITS
    Time codes: 0:00 + 10:24
    Long Note Two by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    ISRC: USUAN1100420
    Time codes: 0:50 + 8:09 + 9:25
    Music for Manatees by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    ISRC: USUAN1400009
    Time code: 3:55
    Perspectives by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    ISRC: USUAN1300027
    Time code: 5:36
    Own mix of bought, individual tracks from
    Music for Manatees by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    ISRC: USUAN1400009
    Time code: 6:54
    In a Heartbeat by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    ISRC: USUAN1100197
    Time code: 9:40
    Peace of Mind by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    ISRC: USUAN1200099
    All music above licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
    creativecommons...
    Time code: 8:50
    Mix of two tracks:
    1) The Shimmering by fran_ky (freesound.org/s/237363)
    Licensed under Creative Commons 0 license
    2) Spacial Harvest by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
    creativecommons...
    ISRC: USUAN1100653
    #Brainiac75 #CandleFlame #NerdChristmas

ความคิดเห็น • 616

  • @H0A0B123
    @H0A0B123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    Can you measure the increase in air pressure near a magnet?

    • @erikziak1249
      @erikziak1249 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I would expect the air pressure to decerase near the flame. Basically a sort of Venturi effect. I might be very wrong with my assumtion, as it would form in an unclosed area, not a pipe.

    • @H0A0B123
      @H0A0B123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@erikziak1249 I think the Bernoulli Effect would apply in that case.
      Anyway, I meant measuring the effect of the magnet on the air without the flame. Also measuring the O2 concentration might be interesting, but I think we need precise measurement devices for these things.

    • @erikziak1249
      @erikziak1249 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You are correct and you propose a very interesting idea. Now the question is, how to measure it scientifically? Could it be used to enrich the air with O2, e. g. in high altitudes? How would such an apparatus look like? How efficient would it be? What could we expect? Questions over questions....

    • @H0A0B123
      @H0A0B123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@erikziak1249i'll have to do some research on that. Maybe some other people have studied it.

    • @H0A0B123
      @H0A0B123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@erikziak1249 We are too late. Someone made a patent patents.google.com/patent/US7771509
      But I bet they didn't create the device.

  • @999thenewman
    @999thenewman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Just imagine how well the local hardware store staff knows Brainiac75 every time he makes a video.

  • @mykulpierce
    @mykulpierce 5 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    It'd be really hard to falsify the results considering a flame needs oxygen to even exist. We would need to find a flame that can enter a plasma state in the absence of oxygen in an a inert atmosphere to test. The flame is also susceptible to electrostatic fields, so we cannot be completely neutral.

    • @polyjohn3425
      @polyjohn3425 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Nitromethane can burn in the absence of ambient oxygen, using a fiberglass wick.

    • @flydrop8822
      @flydrop8822 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Or maybe, you could try testing each theory one by one, without the use of flames, the air displacing the flame theory, for example can be tested with any sensitive system that would detect the air being displaced by the magnet.

    • @laharl2k
      @laharl2k 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i was thinking the same, my idea is that the charged particles in the flame move mecause of convection and so get deflected as the cros the magnetic flield lines.

    • @polyjohn3425
      @polyjohn3425 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@laharl2k I don't think the ionization plays a significant role. Fire is a quasineutral plasma, the intermediate products have a fairly even distribution of ionization.

    • @video99couk
      @video99couk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Maybe a Bunsen burner with oxygen feed at the bottom, then set up to burn in a nitrogen filled container.

  • @flimsybop
    @flimsybop 5 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    One possibly interesting experiment is to use a reverse flame. I recall Cody's Lab doing a video on an oxygen flame in a propane environment. You could make an atmosphere of some hydrocarbon that does not respond to a magnet, and flow a stream of oxygen through a small steel tube then light it. Then see if the magnet will deflect the oxygen flame towards it due to paramagnetism.

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly what I was thinking should be done

    • @vincentrobinette1507
      @vincentrobinette1507 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the results would be the same, even if you light oxygen as a fuel in a propane atmosphere.

    • @Diamondragan
      @Diamondragan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe not a steel tube, though?

  • @sheauwn6974
    @sheauwn6974 5 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    The solution to testing if air is the problem is rudimentary, even scholastic!
    Simply light the candle in a vacuum, where there is, of course, no air, and test it there!
    :)

    • @evilpigeonsify
      @evilpigeonsify 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      how would he move the magnet in said vacuum?

    • @BCDeshiG
      @BCDeshiG 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I see what you did there

    • @DrBluefall
      @DrBluefall 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@evilpigeonsify maybe attached to a motor that can move the magnet back and forth?

    • @mykulpierce
      @mykulpierce 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      This has to be a joke comment. Fire triangle! Heat, fuel, air

    • @Canadian_Teemo
      @Canadian_Teemo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      ​@hama prgasc r/woooosh

  • @MrRishik123
    @MrRishik123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +164

    What about some schlieren photography or a flat laser beam like what Physics girl showed in her recent video. Maybe we would be able to see the air being pushed with that laser cross-section

    • @wieslaw54
      @wieslaw54 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's what I've been asking for...

    • @MrRishik123
      @MrRishik123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wieslaw54 great minds think alike ;)

    • @endersteve5839
      @endersteve5839 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      L x kira

    • @alluseri
      @alluseri 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      girl

  • @Muonium1
    @Muonium1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is such a brilliant, elegant explanation. I'm embarrassed I didn't arrive at it myself after having seen the effect shown so clearly in other places like Ben Krasnow's channel. You've effectively rediscovered a version of the magneto-Archimedes effect published some years back (see one of my earliest videos). Everyone was so distracted by the ionization potential of the flame, including myself, that it blinded us from the obvious and more parsimonious explanation. I now believe the relevant paper here is probably Ueno and Harada's 1987 "Effects of magnetic fields on flames and gas flow". Most excellent work. I will be initiating regular donation to your patreon shortly.

  • @ethanoverwatch407
    @ethanoverwatch407 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I think the flame got bigger/smaller when you moved the newly created contraption was because the air was repelled into the flame making it burn bigger and faster, and opposite for when the flame was smaller. Thus the flame itself wasn't directly effected from the magnetic fields but rather from the air being pushed and pulled by the magnet and this resulted in this effect. Just a thought though, I'm no scientist.

  • @flydrop8822
    @flydrop8822 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Really nice! Maybe, you could try hanging very small sheets of paper(or a any material that has very weak diamagnetism/paramagnetism, being almost neutral to the magnet's force) with as little mass as possible, and putting your strongest magnet near it, to see if it would be pushed away from the magnet due to the air being attracted to it.
    For even further research, you could use a vacuum chamber, take out all the air from it, add any diamagnetic gas(like argon) and doing the same test inside the chamber, and if the magnet indeed pushes the flame due to the air displacing it, the first test would be true and the second false.
    I love your videos! Keep with the good work!

  • @steve-o6413
    @steve-o6413 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love videos where the observer becomes the Scientist drawing their own conclusions. Anyone can rig a experiment for any outcome they want.

  • @carmeloxuereb8733
    @carmeloxuereb8733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant. Very convincingly explained. Thanks for sharing.

  • @johntheux9238
    @johntheux9238 5 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    I've just try with my own 35mm wide neodymium magnet and a lighter. Came closer and closer and... lighter escape of my hand and hit the magnet... Feel dumb xD

  • @user-it5wu5iv1w
    @user-it5wu5iv1w 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Okay i just started watching but have to say this, i love the explenation you put for diagmanetism on the top of the video! Its great because while i know the meaning i can sometimes forget! Thank you for taking the time and doing so, especially when it's put in such a clean and easy way to read without disturbing the showed footage!

    • @user-it5wu5iv1w
      @user-it5wu5iv1w 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ooo, another smooth recap of the stearin was which is also really nice!

    • @user-it5wu5iv1w
      @user-it5wu5iv1w 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh and i love how when something was too complicated to explain in the video, you wrote it out so it was easy to pause the video and look it up!

    • @user-it5wu5iv1w
      @user-it5wu5iv1w 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much for making this! It was super fun and intresting as always, and it was super cool to see the flames reaction to the magnets, as well as what the actual reasons behind it was!

    • @user-it5wu5iv1w
      @user-it5wu5iv1w 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, if you were to ever make merchendise i would love to buy it! The hazard circle would be super cool as a pin, on a shirt or as a bag!

  • @erikziak1249
    @erikziak1249 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    There migt be some Conada effect on the bearing ball as well, attracting the flame to the ball. At least a little bit. Same goes with the magnetic ball, as it is defined by shape and air flow. However, the other effects are much stronger. Btw. a very nice video and I especially like how you take the air itself into account. This is really proper science here, applying the scientific method to explain the observed events.

    • @Tore_Lund
      @Tore_Lund 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      One thing I wondered: Why hasn't been exploited as a generator? Plasma moves up because of convection so two electrodes in top and bottom of the flame should have a potential? This is possibly the simplest heat engine generator!

  • @rubynights3
    @rubynights3 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was admittedly excited about the confirmation that diamagnetism is part of the answer, because at the beginning of the video I guessed that before the intro was even over. I'm proud of myself. :P

  • @LordCaledonFraszer
    @LordCaledonFraszer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beyond that it's essential to life, the only thing I knew about air is that it's thermal reactive, it expands when hot and contracts when cold. That's why our cars get tire warning lights in summer and winter for overpressure and underpressure respectively. It never occurred to me that air was paramagnetic as well. Learning something new with every video, thank you Sir Brian!

  • @HaveorcArts
    @HaveorcArts 5 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    The magnet's bite is worse than it's bark.

  • @AluminumOxide
    @AluminumOxide 5 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Make sure that the magnet doesn’t heat up! Great video

    • @Poppacap79
      @Poppacap79 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Aluminum Oxide why?

    • @Canadian_Teemo
      @Canadian_Teemo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@Poppacap79 I know what he means but the flame has such a low temperature that it won't happen.
      If magnets get high enough temperature it will lose its magnetizing power.

    • @jklalskjdjhg7227
      @jklalskjdjhg7227 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Poppa Cap if it heats up too much it weakens the magnetic field

    • @DaffyDaffyDaffy33322
      @DaffyDaffyDaffy33322 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Canadian_Teemo Candle flames certainly are hot enough, by a lot. Those bigger magnets will take a while, but for smaller magnets (say, 10mm diameter and below) it only takes a few seconds for them to fall off of whatever they're stuck to due to loss of magnatism.

    • @Canadian_Teemo
      @Canadian_Teemo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DaffyDaffyDaffy33322 I just did some research and you are correct. I underestimated the heat generated by the candle flame.

  • @trombosis4961
    @trombosis4961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    No creo que sea necesario decir que se viene por parte de UPDT, solamente hay que disfrutar el video y la explicación del por qué pasa esto :D

  • @insano-mq5cb
    @insano-mq5cb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Al quien mas viene de updt

  • @nigelman9506
    @nigelman9506 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this channel, excellent explanations, easy to see experiments, short and to the point, not stretched out to make the video longer, perfect

  • @nijram15
    @nijram15 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting effect! However you lack a control test: in a environment without oxygen there should not be any deflection. Creating a flame in an oxygen starved environment is hard, but can be done if you seperate the oxygen inlet.
    However, I immediately thought of magneto hydrodynamics (MHD) . The flame consists of moving magnetic molecules, thereby they experience a Lorentz force. The equations for this also describe the effects in the core of the earth. Pretty cool stuff!

  • @Leonardokite
    @Leonardokite 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're having to much fun dude!!! Awesome. Thanks for the video.

  • @an0ana
    @an0ana 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Creepy, weird comment. Was just about to go to bed and saw you had a new video up. Your voice is so relaxing, and I love your content

  • @deluxeassortment
    @deluxeassortment 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a tiny amount of plasma in fire. It's not much, but it is enough to create an ion wind away from the magnet. If you'll notice, the effect is more pronounced at the base of the flame, where it is more blue and the ions are in higher concentration.

  • @andresbravo2003
    @andresbravo2003 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That magnet on the right in the beginning is so satisfying... 😲👌🏻

  • @cowsagainstcapitalism347
    @cowsagainstcapitalism347 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A few moments ago I randomly thought "Can a magnetic field affect a flame?" and here I am. GOBLESS the internet.

  • @jackadams8197
    @jackadams8197 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This should have WAY more views

  • @Dilophi
    @Dilophi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    06:58
    Woooah dude, did you really sacrifice a second sponge just to make them match the plastic cap colors? Even though you knew that the sponges get obscured by the magnets?
    That's some brutal determination.

  • @davida.5683
    @davida.5683 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm liking this in advance. This is the faith I have.
    Greetings from Indiana, USA.

  • @owengriffithsmusic
    @owengriffithsmusic 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the best channels on TH-cam

  • @hemanthshenoy618
    @hemanthshenoy618 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never thought I'd learn something new about two balls put together with fire.

  • @sacredyveltal4688
    @sacredyveltal4688 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brainiac is back! I really missed these :D
    Thank you for coming back, you're one of the few channels that can subside my thirst for science. Looking forward to more.
    How have you been? :)

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hehe, I do upload each month, but maybe you are only recommend my videos with 'Monster magnet meets...' in the title? Try clicking the notification bell if you want to tell TH-cam to show every of my video.... Thanks for watching this one, Sacred :D

    • @sacredyveltal4688
      @sacredyveltal4688 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brainiac75 I do have the bell set up in order to show every video, it's just that I am subscribed to channels with a very constant upload schedule and you get used to seeing new videos very often. Of course, quality over quantity is best, I love every video of yours and I won't complain at all for your upload style. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding.
      Thank you for your concern and reply.

  • @svenpetersen1965
    @svenpetersen1965 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video. I have guessed the diamagnetic properties of the flame, but I didn‘t think of the paramagnetism of the air.

  • @MrFmiller
    @MrFmiller 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Years ago I used a fish tank air pump to draw oxygen from a magnet. I directed the flow into a Bunsen burner and used a thermocouple to measure the increase in temperature to confirm the increase of oxygen. The setup was crude so I could not determine any absolute values. That was long before the availibility of rare earth magnets and the thermocouple was a simple twisted wire. The effect was very slight but it did work. It was an interesting experiment.

  • @alystair
    @alystair 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Doing the schlieren idea + a test in vacuum or neutral gas would be an excellent follow up :D

  • @TheGoodS8n
    @TheGoodS8n 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Flames reacting to high voltage and static charges would be a cool video idea

  • @stoopidhaters
    @stoopidhaters 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You've basically invented a Candle dimmer.
    Great educational video though :)

  • @abbysapples1225
    @abbysapples1225 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a very excellent video. I would have never thought that a magnet would have altered the flame. The way you present your evidence is very beautiful. I've been a subscriber for a little while and I've seen your channel change and get better more professional excellent keep up the great work Brian

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much, Joshua. More to come :D

  • @theschwag
    @theschwag 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hooray! Science time! Thank you brainiac 75!

  • @Cynthia_Cantrell
    @Cynthia_Cantrell 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Interesting... it makes me wonder if you could effectively extract oxygen from air using a series of powerful magnets.

  • @christmassnow3465
    @christmassnow3465 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    To test if the oxygen is attracted, and not the flame is repelled, you can do the following test: ignite a mix of air & fuel. Let the flame exit through a hole into a vacuum chamber. You can then repeat the magnet test in the vacuum chamber. Another interesting test: put a candle on the surface of a monster-magnet, where the oxygen content is said to be higher. Light the candle and watch the air flow above it, as fresh oxygen is constantly pulled to the magnet, replacing the exhaust fume.

  • @HiDeguild
    @HiDeguild 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    If it can be done safely, I'd love to see one of the monster manners and a metal object sandwiching some different objects to visualize the crushing force produced by the magnet.

  • @metatechnologist
    @metatechnologist 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's the material in the wicks some have threads of metal. Metallic ions in the combustion is what is making the flames dance in the presence of a magnetic field.

  • @chrisakaschulbus4903
    @chrisakaschulbus4903 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    We need more tests with candles and electro magnets... make the flames dance to the beat :D

  • @AguaFluorida
    @AguaFluorida 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Further tests are necessary with an oxy-propane flame in a vacuum. This would help support the paramagnetic air displacement hypothesis.

  • @abteentajdin8877
    @abteentajdin8877 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is something very satisfying about watching a flame dance without actually touching it , thank you , your videos always teach me something new , this is going to be a fun topic to talk about with my friend , keep up the amazing work that you are doing , I still get nervous when you are working with the giant magnet please be careful
    As always sorry for any grammatical errors
    PS: greetings from Iran 🌷💓

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks Abteen. Glad you always like and comment on my videos :D

  • @thelamb288
    @thelamb288 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is simple experiments like this that make you wonder how a Quasar can consume so much mass and energy. Cheers.

  • @phoenixiguidez531
    @phoenixiguidez531 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always love watching these videos because I'm always always learning something new

  • @general_prodigy
    @general_prodigy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Ouch, did anyone else hear the annoying high pitched sound when he put the magnet near the Cathod Ray Tube TV? What is going on?

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  5 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Sorry, my 43 years old ears didn't hear it all... I believe the fly-back transformer in a CRT TV runs at 15 kHz. Maybe it went crazy near the magnet?

    • @rideswithscissors
      @rideswithscissors 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I heard a low sound.

    • @ThefireballVR
      @ThefireballVR 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@brainiac75 I heard it before the magnet got near it. It's a high frequency kind of pitch that all of those TVs put off.
      I can always tell there's a CRT TV nearby when I hear that noise.

    • @keepironman14
      @keepironman14 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Somebody never had a tv b4 flatscreens. I'm like the last reply, that sound is tell tale. I'll actually give it the likely hood that it's not completely aged ears but rather being used to the sound. It's only slightly off tone from when your ears are ringing. (Or the sound used in movies/tv for "explosion disorientation")
      But i will say i hear nothing in the flash back clip.

    • @general_prodigy
      @general_prodigy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was thinking it might be electrons flying into the mic which makes a high pitch noise

  • @cyberdragon3699
    @cyberdragon3699 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Flames are definitely conductive, just not at the few volts of a DMM probe. At higher voltages they become extremely reactive to electricity and adding more ions to the flame increases this effect. It can be used to make plasma speakers which are more efficient than air-ionized ones.

  • @tk423b
    @tk423b ปีที่แล้ว

    My HS physics teacher had a big block of hematite. We could get small iron pieces to orbit the block before they collided. That would be a cool video

  • @sophialopez8024
    @sophialopez8024 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The flame is plasma, that's why. This means that we should be able to use the concept of a railgun to accelerate plasma from combustion to great velocity. Instead of just using a normal rocket engine to produce thrust, by putting a compact nuclear reactor on a spaceship to generate electricity, we could use less rocket fuel and compensate by hyperaccelerating the plasma with the electromagnetic railgun.

  • @xenthosbobo
    @xenthosbobo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i greatly appreciate your magnet videos...i have not enough overall $ to do some of those experiments, but are all things i have wanted to do

  • @blank_percentage
    @blank_percentage 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now you know one of the flame fears😂👌. Btw great vid 😁👍

  • @wread42
    @wread42 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If there were smoke, you could see how the particles of smoke moved and from that understand how the air was moving. If the magnet is really repelling the flame, a styrofoam boat with a candle and a magnet fixed to the boat should propel itself along.

  • @lancethrustworthy
    @lancethrustworthy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was refreshing and enlightening. You put it simply enough that even I could grasp what was going on. Brava/o!
    Air is Paramagnetic! Cool!
    I wonder how that might be applied industrially.

  • @phoenixiguidez531
    @phoenixiguidez531 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You never disappoint Brian. Always good, educational content!

  • @tensevo
    @tensevo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plot twist: Everything is magnetic,
    you've just not used a big enough magnet.

  • @Kitsudote
    @Kitsudote ปีที่แล้ว

    Probing a flame is something I could see ElectroBOOM doing 😂

  • @vincentrobinette1507
    @vincentrobinette1507 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think your 3rd theory is the major player. The conductive plasma is flowing upward, cutting the lines of flux from the magnet. The induced eddy current in the flame reflects the magnetic field, creating repulsion. If you took the big, flat magnet, and held it edge wise to the flame, it would have had a big effect on the flame, just like passing aluminum through the field. That explains why the flame is repelled when you have a north pole on one side, a south pole on the other. Just drop a bar of aluminum through the gap, you'll see the force i'm talking about. It has to be moving to do it, and the rapidly rising flame provides that velocity. Granted, the plasma has high resistance, but those Neodymium Iron Boron magnets do generate a pretty dense magnetic field, and it doesn't take much force to influence a low density flame. the up draft velocity of a flame is actually pretty quick, due to the buoyancy of the light flame.

  • @terriecotham1567
    @terriecotham1567 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    loved it, thanks for taking the time to make and post this video

  • @TiagoCheregati
    @TiagoCheregati 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Spectacular, man. Very nice.

  • @HejaHammerfall
    @HejaHammerfall 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    There TH-cam. I've now completed your daily quest of 'Watch a recommended video that has nothing to do with the rest of your feed'.

  • @crazypaulfreebrain
    @crazypaulfreebrain 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I once put a notebook computer with an old school CRT monitor on the passenger seat of my van. When driving on the Interstate Highways, the image on the CRT monitor was effected by the MAGNET fields of the rebar encased inside of the concrete road bed. Go figure.

  • @dr.jenniferjewellphdearthq9297
    @dr.jenniferjewellphdearthq9297 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brian Thank You for good science ! ❤️

  • @taith2
    @taith2 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd suggest running small/slow pump with intake hose as close as possible to magnet, use captured gas in to flame test and see if it is oxygen in majority.

  • @tasmedic
    @tasmedic 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This raises the question whether it is possible to concentrate oxygen present in the air simply using magnets.

  • @marvinkitfox3386
    @marvinkitfox3386 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8:40
    When you are playing with the double magnet and the flame there is a very noticeable lag between magnet position and flame orientation. The flame effectively seems to be reacting to where the magnets were, 1/4 of a second before.
    This strongly supports the thought that the flame is not being directly pulled/repelled by the magnet, but rather by a secondary effect. I.E. the "wind" caused by the magnets' effect on the air surrounding them and the flame.
    Maybe some tests with smoketrails in the air, if you can find a smoke substance that is very neutral magnetically and thus not itself affected, just carried by the air movements?

  • @photoproblemsolver611
    @photoproblemsolver611 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:25 It rhymes so perfectly LOL.

  • @Coyote0874
    @Coyote0874 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations on half a million subs

  • @vinodkumar-wm3oq
    @vinodkumar-wm3oq 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man I've seen an experiment to prove it, use liquid oxygen between your powerful magnets! you can clearly 'see' the effect. Glad I could relate it to that :)
    P.S. Great video again man.

  • @omkr0122
    @omkr0122 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can get a better effect in nearing a charged ball of a Van De Graff generator near a small flame. The jet of the flame gets reversed!

  • @sebastianstewart6894
    @sebastianstewart6894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So it's a mixture of cow and palm oil/fats?
    FYI the magnetic field of normal candle flame (why it has a stable shape) is very self contained so it doesnt changes shape easily when exposed to outside sources but if it was a flame tornado it should be more easily manipulated. (this is going on the theory of the flame battery where a bigger flame increases the electrical discharge.

  • @fredriks5090
    @fredriks5090 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magnets are spacetime whirlpools.
    Black holes reaches the ocean floor however.

  • @Techno-Universal
    @Techno-Universal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That’s also the same principle that makes flames get repelled by gravity causing them to want to rise on earth! :)

  • @miguelhenriques3308
    @miguelhenriques3308 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice video, as always with astonishing image quality and presentation, everything was very well explained! Once more, Congrats! About the flames, I think we can call it "case closed"!

  • @christmassnow3465
    @christmassnow3465 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Check the diamagnetism of the gases above the flame too. You may use an infra red camera to see the effect.

  • @miklov
    @miklov 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wasn't going to watch this because the thumbnail looked like a click bait. Didn't know the flame would deflect that much ^^

  • @jmalmsten
    @jmalmsten 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how the multimeter does a quick shout out to satan before getting ready to meter values. :P

  • @josephdoiron8376
    @josephdoiron8376 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would be really interesting to see what effect the magnet would have on some evenly displaced smoke.

    • @Linus-nq2op
      @Linus-nq2op 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmm I think it depends on the material the smoke is made of (and it's magnetic properties), maybe if it's more magnetic than air (or is slightly repelled) you could seperate the solid phase from the gas phase of the smoke.

  • @sweeflyboy
    @sweeflyboy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Although the oxygen theory would be significant, remember that flames are actually lighter than air, and so pose near no
    resistance.

  • @zUltra3D
    @zUltra3D 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Before: Roasting marshmallows
    Now: Roasting magnets...

  • @DeShakeel
    @DeShakeel 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is one of my fave science channels

  • @yokatta-f
    @yokatta-f 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks I will remind this when fighting a giant flame-spitting monster

  • @noobhacker101
    @noobhacker101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That sound of the CRT... GRRR

  • @thedesaj2879
    @thedesaj2879 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe try putting a neodymium magnet on an induction desk. Just keep your ears safe from the pitch sound, its intensity could be mutliplied by the magnet's force.

  • @UnrealOcean
    @UnrealOcean 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    favorite quote: "time to double the power"

  • @bridgendesar
    @bridgendesar 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here's something to think about, put 2 disc magnets near each other with like poles facing each other enough to feel a force, what do the fields look like as you go closer.

  • @joeblundell299
    @joeblundell299 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 6:31 you could almost have a little piece of cone incense stuck to magnet, so you could see a visual of the air drawing around it. Additionally I would like to see the results on the flame if you had both those magnets set to repel each other. You might also ground the candle wick, they do have a little metal wire in a lot of em, grounding it might result in a different effect.

  • @frisko5225
    @frisko5225 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Esto es un poco de todo 😎

  • @thepvporg
    @thepvporg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The burning creates + and - ions that are affected by electric and magnetic fields. A + charge is repelled.

  • @YourFaultMF
    @YourFaultMF 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This affect is caused by the centrifugal part of the magnet this resembles a torus the outward field of the magnet.

  • @MichaelDavis-zu2ko
    @MichaelDavis-zu2ko 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So the idea is that the magnetic field attracts the surrounding oxygen and not the flame, which causes the flame to have magnetic buoyancy in air, pushing it away from the magnet not just because it is repelled (very slightly) by the magnet, but mostly because it is less attracted to it than oxygen. It's like a helium balloon which is buoyant in air due to gravitational force, not because the helium is repelled by the earth, but because it is less attracted than air.

  • @dELTA13579111315
    @dELTA13579111315 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just from the title alone, I love the premise of the video :D
    Idk how I haven't thought of this

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't know why it took me 10 years to make this video... mostly because I couldn't really explain it and that's so annoying x) Thanks for watching!

    • @dELTA13579111315
      @dELTA13579111315 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brainiac75 Thank you for making your videos! They're very informative and well made. Please keep up the excellent work 👌

  • @bengriffin4027
    @bengriffin4027 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would be nice to have some smoke tracks to visualize the flow of air between the magnet in the flame.

  • @quagmier3
    @quagmier3 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice video. I wonder if there is a way to use a magnetic field to put out a fire. Maybe pulsing the field to prevent combustion. If you could start with putting out a candle and then upscale to a plane over a forest fire would be one of the best inventions this century.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Magnets have the problem, that air is not a good 'magnetic conductor' (it has low permeability), so if your idea is possible, the magnet would have to be very close to the fire. In this case there are cheaper ways than a giant magnet :) Thanks for watching!

  • @edwardlubin322
    @edwardlubin322 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's good science baby!
    You need to continue.

  • @jerry3790
    @jerry3790 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great to see more magnet videos!

  • @nadenitza
    @nadenitza 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe a colorant or some type of smoke in the air will indicate the air rushing towards the magnet between the magnet and the flame?