Peter Boghossian Calls Digital Gnosis for Emotional Support over Mean Words
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
- Peter Boghossian calls Digital Gnosis and his gaggle of hopeless co-conspirators (Lindsay and Pluckrose) for emotional support after people wrote mean words about him in university newspaper.
----
Support the channel by becoming a Patron: / digitalgnosis
All of my links can be found here: linktr.ee/digi...
One-off PayPal donations welcome - www.paypal.com...
Join the Discord: / discord
His ego keeps inflating every day. He has transformed into the ideologue he criticises the woke left of being
Simulacrum
This is from 2018. See my comment explaining.
Truly experts in grievance studies lol
Unrelated but at 2:35, Nathan's 'can you hear me?' sounds so much like Justin Brierly it's scary. I now want a dedicated video displaying the nascent talent that Nathan has for imitating Justin.
1. Viewers: This is a joke made with footage from 2018. (More below)
2. Nathan: Of course he was upset at the time. (More below)
3. Nathan: Regardless of whether your assessment of Peter's character is correct (and I think it is), this gag is pointlessly venomous. This is not satire.
1. People will not know unless they watch the video closely and they know a lot about Peter and the Grievance Studies project: This is an edited joke using footage from 2018. Someone was making a documentary about the project . That's why they were all videotaping it. It's Peter, Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay. (Date of newspaper is shown near the start.) Nathan edited himself in. That's the joke.
2. All the reactions here are reasonable. Who wouldn't be upset to see a story like this in the Uni paper? Front page. Crazy cartoon. Lindsay was right, it's not just some hit piece. Anonymous signatories. Implication that Peter will threaten them with death.
Go away with your sock account peter 🤣
I think its funny, yes its spiteful, Im mocking Peter the same way he mocks woke people
@@ADDISON396 I am disappointed and disillusioned in Peter Boghossian. He has shown himself to be a narcissistic hypocrite.
@@DigitalGnosis1. So why mock Helen? 2. This is different, in ways that matter, from how he talks about people he disagrees with. 3. Considering that Peter has been rude to you, what's is your motive? Because it looks to me (I mean this sincerely, not as an insult) like you are the one behaving like a butthurt crybaby. (I don't mean that about yesterday's stream, which was thoughtful and interesting. Just about this weird attack video.)
Because I also think Helen is a crybaby. This past week I tried to politely invite her on my show for a discussion and she was incredibly thin skinned and rude, lashing out, called me a gossip columnist, didnt make any attempt to engage with my views and I initially babied her, treading on egg shells trying to get her to actually engage with and challenge my arguments. So now I also think she has a bizarre thin skinned psychology and have sort of limp[ed her in with Peter and Lindsay as morons.
Oof Nathan put down your sandwich and use some headphones!
When did this happen cause I thought Pluckrose and Lindsay all went their separate ways?
2018
@@DigitalGnosisI see.
@@DigitalGnosis
This tells me all I need to know.
persecuted for our TRANS-gressions
I think we should get some odds going on which list will be published first: Gary Habermas with his list of scholars who accept the minimal facts or Peter Boghossian with his list of woke people who are scared to talk to him.
😂😂😂
Prof essional Boghossian👨🏫
They really do believe that any difference between men and women is a result of biology and undermine (almost disregard) the role that social conditioning plays into these differences. One study investigating why gender differences seem larger in egalitarian countries found that the more individuals believe that men and women are different, the more they create gender segregations even in instances when real sex differences don't exist
"They really do believe that any difference between men and women is a result of biology" This doesn't read as smug and condescending to you?
@@shyman3000 No.
@@unathirams Then you need to get out of the house.
@justanotherhomosapian5101: I mean, unless you're living under a rock, it is obvious how much people in egalitarian countries believe that men and women are (virtually) not different except in the ultra-really-super-huge-social-conditioning way. You have some pushback, but the pushback against the pushback (which is, of course, pushback on behalf of the progressive narrative against pushback against said narrative) is quite strong, widespread, and aggressive. Meanwhile I can't imagine, say, in Saudi Arabia, there being a similar level of such pushback on behalf of the progressive narrative, but contrary to whatever study you referenced, despite a firmer belief in the differences, they did not create more gender segregations (as relevant to the topic at hand) compared to those of the egalitarian countries. Unless you think that aforementioned aggressive pushback is largely being done dishonestly, in which case, well, that would be interesting, since a lot of moral posturing often depends upon saying things like the platitudes of how virtually speaking no one is really different but because of different encouragement you get all these weird merely-apparent differences, but if the words lose the meaning, then real-life actions might finally speak louder than words as dishonestly promised (perhaps until now).
An example of words speaking louder than actions, by the way, was when Jimmy Kimmel's objectionable history was recognized, but since he still says the words he's supposed to say, well, as long as his mouth works and so on, he can keep saying whatever words the relevant people want to hear, and because the magic words still came out of his mouth after all, nothing socially important was lost... in the perception of many people.
"... even in instances when real sex differences don't exist" Wtf does this even mean?
Wonder why Bog hasn't confronted his pal James Lindsay over the complete nonsense he writes about philosophy and Marxism. Bog's all about professionalism and scholarship unless you're a fash nutbag but also Bog is def not fash he's "rational".
And I've never thought about this before but James Lindsay has been pretty much conceptual penising the right wing for years now but nobody on the right has caught on. Lol!
He's a rash fash.
This is the dumbest sentence written in the universe. Lindsay knows more about Marxism than Bhogossian. Almost everyone knows more about anything than Bhogosssian.
James is spot on about Marxism. In his podcast, New Discourses, he dives really deep into the ideology of Marxism, modern feminism and leftism in general, their roots and how they manifests in different facets of our culture.
It would really help if you provide some evidence that it's nonsense.
Boomer Boghossian. 😄
You got him good!
cheap move
@@alibabaschultz352 Yes.
@@2silkworm PeBo is a cheap guy. Which despot did he sell out too? The name escapes me atm.
I agree with Peter--the anonymous hit piece is disgraceful
i am so glad i have no idea who did what to whom.
Man, he really lives rent free in your head, doesn't he?
He pays his rent - thanks for your view and ad revenue 🤭
This was incredibly dumb
Nobody is perfect, but this was down right painful to watch. You joke isnt funny
For me, this clip rather badly misses its intended target. Boghossian's reaction to the article seems neither surprising nor outrageous.
I may lack some background in this particular matter, but TH-camrs need enemies to get those views and likes. I notice a fair amount of this.
The obsession with this guy is getting weird now...
Your obsesion with me is weird! You're coming to all these videos :(
@@DigitalGnosis You may not believe it, but I actually care about honest and intelligent conversations. I saw the video where you did the street epistemology with Peter Bog, and thought you did a fantastic job (i said as much on the video). I suppose you used that bit of fame to launch this youtube channel, which i thought was a good idea, since you clearly can offer a lot to these topics. But, when i see these videos being tribal and immature and divisive, i call them out.
You say people like Peter Bog live in an echo chamber with no push back. I agree. And its time for you to walk the walk.
I walked the walk all the way to MULTIPLE SE sessions, pub meets with Peter and to the flat he interviewed Rationality Rules in. Am I supposed to break and enter to get him to talk to me if he doesnt want to?
@@DigitalGnosis Thats not at all what i meant. "Walk the walk" as in, embrace pushback.
As far as Peter Bog, i would ignore him at this point. Move on to other topics.
@@alibabaschultz352 What do you mean by "embrace pushback"? DG has engaged and answered your questions. Do you require him to agree with you?
You mean words have consequences? Say it ain't so!
😂😂😂 poor baby....
One time I was rolling with @peterboghossian doing Brazilian jiu jitsu and due to his Crohn’s disease he had diarrhea and it sprayed everywhere, soaking me and the onlookers with runny feces. 💩
This is funny?
Im not sure I agree with shaming someone for a medical condition like Crohns
(Titanic theme)
sensitive, isn't he. My personal interaction with him left me feeling he was a hypocrite and fraud.
why though?
@@2silkworm Well, seemed to be acting in entirely bad faith (whilst accusing others of it). And he was silent when his supporters acted like a pack of attack dogs which, if it were done by "the Woke", he'd be heavily criticising.
@@CurtOntheRadio Why it seems so? I watched a lot of interviews, debates and street epistemology videos with him and never notice him acting dishonestly? And what is the episode with his supporters you're referring to?
@@2silkworm You can make up your own mind. If you believe he has integrity that's your judgement. I was disappointed, that's all I want to say.
@@CurtOntheRadio Objectively true.
PBRI
Excellent troll.
LOL
Pretty funny :)
Islamists as well