human wisdom is too slow, if we depend on it we will never progress faster. i wanna be alive to see a frutiger aero utopia. look humans arent so smart but also not completely irrational, AI hardly will be used for bad or will even turn bad. humans trains AI to be better than humans, to be more fair than humans and to just do the right thing that humans often would not. AI rn is just a tool but if someday become sentient and all, i will respect as i respect any other living being. humans have no exclusivity, just a little more processing power than other species. this is much like the second industrial revolution... AI is as big evolution factor as discovering how to make fire.
@@jktech2117 That's not gonna happen thanks to the apathy and greed of corporations. Digital tech will improve with the standard 40% per year, while other companies will remain at 5~10% per decade. This advancement disparity will cascade through society and effect human behavior, will, opinions, the economy, society, jobs, nature, and more, acting as a catalyst for the problems and further boosting disparity in advancement, and not in a stable way either. This will result in dystopia and catastrophic missed opportunities for improvement if left unchecked. That's why it's in our best interests to activate the necessary operation
@@UhmAhctually dont forget many big corporations are actually suffering due to AI or soon will. what you think that will be left of media if u can generate whatever you want to consume? google is already getting a hit cuz chatgpt is already better than them to search stuff.
The bleak reality of AI kinda set in a couple months ago. One of my professors, who has decades of experience in law enforcement and subcontracting for attorneys told us that video evidence may become completely inadmissable in court. The scarier thought though, is that gap in between the actual legislation targeting AI video in court, where an AI generated video could genuinely put somebody behind bars for a significant period of time. The thought of being able to ruin someone's life with a simple prompt within the near future terrifies me to the bone.
Even more dystopian, imagine the government intentionally leaves that gap open so it can just determine which evidence is real and which isn't to its own convenience
That's very scary on many levels. Video evidence aids access to justice in a lot of contexts including protecting the most vulnerable, on either side of any scenario.
Though, as someone who wants to make a name for themselves, the idea of any opposition being able to ruin my life in an instant is terrifying. How do people not see this? In the future, no people may ever want to do anything for this exact reason.
@@alphasaft2130 They aren't dangerous. They are in fact very ineffective at what they are supposed to be doing. He is just trying to sell shares. Saying that it's this dangerous makes it look like the AI he is creating has potential and will there by gain the interest of people with money. Denmark, the danish government. Literally just bought this whole AI setup to help with governmental and healthcare tasks AI is still not good at anything other than maybe being an upgrade to AI's in computer games.
Main issue for AI for me that no one is talking about, as a programmer, are the ‘model collapse’ Think of it as scanning a photo, you use the human data to copy it, but… what happens when you copy the copied photo? It loses quality, it’s been studied multiple times. Even something simple as text is prone to this No matter the quality, it just happens, degrade the model… The only known way is to set data before 2023, but then… everything will be outdated There’s many research documents on this, recommend looking it up, it’s a cool rabbit hole I went down
Ai inbreeding. It's funny, but is a strikingly good analogy. If you copy the "genetic" information enough times, making a couple mistakes, those mistakes will be copied.
The AI inbreeding will slow down advancements, which is good. We will need to adapt and also figure out how AI learns and interface with it properly. Musk is offering free DNI installations. We are running out of energy also, so we will have time to figure things out.
Experts aren't exactly sure whether or not this will be an issue going forward. There are many different techniques that can regularize the data and prevent this kind of degradation. That being said, we are running out of data to be trained on in the first place. It's no surprise why OpenAI's GPT-4 has stagnated and instead been made multi-modal. Building out the other low hanging fruit is easier to do while you wait for quality data to be collected. *cough cough* (like the data they are getting from people using Chat GPT)
If thats all the Ai is to you then there truly is no need to worry if that's all it is. The problem here is that people like you are completely and utterly wrong. AI is far more than just that, its far more powerful, far more capable and therefore far more revolutionary (whether in a good or bad way). Make sure not to underestimate it.
as someone who wants to pursue animation as a future job, AI actually terrifies me, I love animation, and would love to do it for a living, but I'm afraid by the time I'm qualified to animate in a studio my passion will be null void because AI would take my job for me. Its scary knowing your job can just be taken by AI. Personally I would wish for a world without AI, but I know that won't happen. No matter what I will never give up my dream until AI forcefully rips it out of my hands.
what makes ai dangerous is how people will use it, take this as a scenario of everybody having nuke buttons, either noone presses it or everyone presses is in hope of being last one to survive. in one way or another, humans are dangerous. ai is a tool like pencil you can make drawings but also you can go jhon wick.
Its the "make a video of vladamir putin declaring nuclear war on the us" type of videos that are scary but i'd like to think that whenever AI makes any sort of video it has some sort of serial number in it that can be detected by other AI softwares, sort of like how viruses are made by humans but we overcame them by having other humans make counter virus measures. I think it'll be reigned in, every time theres a big leap in technology we all get scared because its the unknown. people were scared of Y2k in the same way
@@12pentaborane no like ai cant learn how to learn nor it can produce something new by itself, its always humans and will be humans, even in the earlier machine revolution people were worried about and even started fighting for machines replacing humans yet the machines didnt replace them if was humans that used machines similarly its for ai. its nothing dangerous but what makes it dangerous is that instead of requiring huge group people some will be able to carry the tasks with more efficiency anyway these ai only reduce the cost put into doing same work and time ofcourse.
@@hmmmmmm_3429 If you can train the AI with enough data, it can make new concepts. A human baby isn't coming up with anything, but as it learns what it's predecessors done before (statistics, math, science) they can apply it. Our body perceives the world and that influences our decisions and we learn off that. An AI model can't really walk or whatnot and perceive it's environment so of course it can't learn out of nothing. It's almost like a brain. I don't think AI will be dangerous, it will be another tool for everyone to use like google translator. It didn't put any one out jobs, and I really doubt we as people would allow AI to drive vehicles right now. It's gonna be at least another decade or two.
The inflection point arises when the default mindset flips from ' This video was most likely made by a real person' to 'this video was most likely made by AI' when this point arrives depends on how much 'critical mass' AI generated content achieves- but that it will arrive seems to me inevitable unless some foolproof way is found to clealy label generated content as AI. But there are huge sums of money being invested in this labelling not happening because those who would profit from using Gen AI intutively understand that being forced to label it would make it less appealing and effective.
It seems inevitable to me that there will be an arms race between the improvement of AI and the effectiveness of labelling such AI. Is there a point where we can no longer improve AI and it will eventually stabilise, or will AI grow forever? Also, I think this “inflection point” has already happened. AI can make human essays, and make designs that most people don’t recognise as AI (just look at Temu lol). Let’s just hope that AI can only go so far…
@@antarcticmapper3460 I think you are right technically- already most people can't tell AI Art or Writing from Human made Art or Writing- but I think the general mindset is still very much of the view that if something looks human made it then it is human made. The real problems will start when this baseline assumption is no longer safe to make and we will all be forced to adopt a 'safety first' approach that everything is AI generated until proven otherwise. Also the issue is not only technical- there is real resistance on the part of advertising agencies and other media creators to being forced to label their content as AI generated- I think because knowing something is fake changes your relationship to the material in a negative way, and the Agencies would rather not have to tell their target audiences that they are using fake media- they would rather just put it out there and keep quiet about it.
The only solution at the moment is to label this content as AI. It is not an action that can be undone, and people will obviously use it maliciously, whether at a small scale or large, if the technology is there. Shouldn’t the agencies sympathise with OpenAI? And should they simply stop using AI altogether? Once again human greed comes to ruin everything…
@@antarcticmapper3460I think you are right- unless AI generated content is clearly labeled as such we are going to have real problems in the near future with trust in any kind of media- but I am also aware that this labelling will potentialy damage the commercial application of AI generated material, because it's essentially a label that says 'this content is fake!', which is a negative attribute. So while there are powerful social arguements in favour of clearly identifying AI generated content- there are also powerful commercial interests that will oppose this because they feel it will prevent them from fully exploiting the commercial advantages of using AI. One argument I have heard from the Advertising agencies is that AI is no different to Photoshop- and since they are currently not obliged to declare when Photoshop has been used to manipulate an image, why then should they be obliged to declare when AI is used to create an image? Personally I don't find this arguement convincing- there is a big difference between retouching a real photograph and generating a completely fake photograph in my view- but the fact that arguements like this are being made does reveal the reluctuance of some potential disseminators of AI Generated content to label that content clearly.
I agree with you. AI is an incredibly powerful tool that can manipulate almost anyone if used correctly. Especially as AI will ultimately improve, and the labelling of AI proves to fail. Also, photoshop actually requires human intuition and inconvenience that most people aren’t willing to do and AI is just a matter of prompting, generating a couple of fake videos and then choosing the right one, making AI much more accessible. We just have to hope that more powerful forms of AI will only fall into the right hands (these trusted companies) if labelling is abolished. That way we know it is AI out of the reputation of the company.
We might even do the ah oh we unlock the singularity and lose all of our progress in cells to singularity and have to gain all of our progress In real life We might accidentally destroy the observable universe
At first, I thought this was another AI-hate and fear-mongering video, but as I kept watching, it was well researched and showed concern and opinion from both sides, showing different aspects of this technology. The research is even better than that of some casual AI enthusiasts, but then it went downhill when you talk about “the truth," which is already covered in other parts of the video, but it went uphill again and ended with a positive, hopeful, and neutral ending. The editing of the video is also phenomenal and very engaging. Overall, it’s a great video. ❤
Maybe if you're aware of it, you can do something about it. (Or at least protect yourself from it.) Don't say you'll never be so influential, because it's possible. All you have to do is try.
Imagine when we get to the point where instead of talking to chat gpt we can tell it "make me a soulslike videogame with difficult but fair bosses and enemies" and it generates an entire videogame before your eyes in a matter of minutes But anyways, robot Girlfriends when?
@@quincho6949Cai is quite basic as of right now, the relationship bots are basically incapable of doing anything but kissing and cuddling and whatever else endlessly.
Hey I am a bit late, however I am a datascience enthusiast. You were mostly talking about the capability of generative ai. This is an interesting field, however not nearly as interesting/intimidating as time series, recommendation systems or even reinforcement learning models. These are very nerdy things, however can even predict data through time, and decisions that will be made.
You act like an ai would think like a human. If it’s programmed to tell us whether its conscious or not then it will, end of story. As long as it cant edit its programming (not that it has a reason to. Its a Robot, remember) it will do whatever we tell it. Dangerous ai only comes when we tell it to be human and then we tell it to get better. Now its goal to be emotional and secretive and angry and the whole host of human emotions. This is a surprisingly avoidable outcome. Be robot Dont change
there won't be any self aware AI, no matter how fast the progress goes, AI is a massive line of achievements and we are not close to self awareness at all
Last weekend me and a classmate made a presentation for school and searched up a template for PowerPoint. There was a picture of a guy in it who was labelled Matthew and we thought it was really funny so we searched him up and it came out he was AI generated. I NEVER WOULD HAVE KNOWN HE LOOKS SO REAL WHAT
One argument that has always soothed my worries about AI is that it can only learn from what humans have already made. Every day creators around the world are evolving new sounds, visuals, and stories that will transcend anything before it. AI won't be able to truly reinvent itself if it continues to only learn from what has been made.
This is true, ai can’t exactly leave the box. Yet at least. It will always be confined by the box of knowledge. That’s what makes humans so special is our ability to extend outside the box.
But at what point is the AI the reference? At which point it will keep building upon itself until it will grow infinitely. I’m pretty sure AI has the capability to mutate and evolve itself over time.
@@spdsyt AI: *develops the ability to leave the box in 2030* People: *fear and panic intensifies* Ever biological being on this planet: *does absolutely nothing to improve and adapt, doesn't even abolish overripe issues and remains ignorant until faced with the danger, and proceeds to take the worst approach as a resonse* Corporations: *laughs while AI, and 400 opinionated groups argue amongst eachother on social media, stupidly unaware that it was a corporate who's doing all this, not a glorified computer program*
I always thought that if humans can do it, why can’t AI. All humans are is a collection of neurons interacting in a special way so if computers can replicate that, shouldn’t they be able to achieve the same thought processes as we can? Although, it would take a while to achieve that computing power and lots of research into new techniques, I believe it should still be possible.
It's the best idea possible, if you consider humans to be special in any way. In the current form, humans will not be anything more than any other animal on earth, more intelligent, yes, but still be a species on this small planet doing nothing more than not getting extinct until it finally goes extinct.
One thing I can say is that we as people commonly throw away trends. Ai is a trend. While it’s big enough to get as bad as predicted, it’s likely that we will discard it at some point. It won’t be as new. It won’t be as exciting. Theres the chance that it will be shoved away into a corner of the internet and technological development until it’s repopularized and brought back into the public eye. We need to remember natural human behavior past corruption. We need to remember the masses.
@@vivaelguion You cant compare those things to AI. Because Ai has real potential to have as much impact as the Industrial Revolution and the invention of computers
The CEO of ChatGPT/OpenAI carries a panic button that essentially will detonate all of the servers that the AI operates from if things go out of hand. The fact that he has counter measures for if AI goes rogue scares me
@@synchc no, there are robots already being built, going rogue means "omg that robot has a gun!!" then robs a bank or something. so I wouldn't be surprised if there is a panic button.
It's more than likely just going to collapse the internet. The amount of bots on the internet already constitutes for like 75% of internet traffic. What happens when it's 80%? 90%? 99%? Remember that our internet, the cloud, is still based in physical supercomputers and servers owned by tech companies and governments. Hardware that can only be expanded so far. At what point do the servers get overloaded? At what point, do we reach critical mass?
I'm personally terrified of people making super graphic horror films like the Saw series. And then people watching it, getting some form of Ptsd from seeing things that the human brain cannot distinguish from real life, for example 😅
Love your vids.. Man great content and excellent descriptions and narration.. I really want to get onto making a channel with content like this but I don't think I could talk like you though...
You can do it! It’s taken me many years to get to editing like this I started off making horrible videos. Just try it! Your first video WILL suck but if you like it that shouldn’t matter
It might not be the Minecraft contant but I think I came back here in the right moment of this channel's lifetime. The explanations are simple, yet it's a good way to recap on everythig in AI industry so far. And even if generative content replaces most of the internet we use right now, I think I am glad to know that I'll have this channel to come back to one day. Keep up the good work, don't let news discourage you, it's about creating something, even if it's not perfect, as once it happened before with loosing a fight to a chess computer it didn't stop anyone from playing, and so we shouldn't stop creating something new.
To think that we all were at some point hoping the future would be flying cars and stuff, now all it brings me is fear. I hate the thought of AI and Technology taking away and replacing everything, jobs away from people, nature, and AI is ruining art too, I never liked the idea of AI. I hate the thought of living in a desolate, dystopian world where technology rules basically everything, I’d hate to live in the world where I can’t just walk outside and enjoy the peacefulness of nature, to live in a world where people only depend on being behind a screen for communication. I don’t know how anyone can enjoy a future like that, a cold, desolate future. I’d hate to think that one day, some idiot is gonna decide to cut every last tree down. I hate to think that this is the kind of future some people want, just the thought of living in a future like that brings me a cold, terrifying feeling. I wouldn’t want to have anything to do with a future like that, dead or alive. The thought of AI alone, gives me a cold, fearful feeling. I don’t mind having technology, but I fear we might advance it so much to the point where we don’t even bother to leave our homes, and communicate in person, or enjoy nature, or stuff like that. We shouldn’t depend on something that can replace everything we know, that can easily be exploited for who knows what.
😮 that statement is just complete incorrect bulshit😮 know when everyone's super 😮 will be a segment of people even more super than them😮 some people will remain human others will turn into metahuman gods others will turn into literal non-human gods like energy beings😮 other people will find out God is real and just commune with him just stay around his throne😮 just because you feel like you're not super doesn't mean everybody else is bro😮 just because you want to stagnate and not do anything doesn't mean everybody else will😮
1:47 path from GPT1 to GPT4 didn't take one year, GTP1 was published in 2018 and GPT4 was released in 2023, so it wasn't as fast as you say it was. Almost all LLMs (GPT, Gemini, Mistral) are using the same transformer architecture, so the only technological progress we have really achieved is making the AI models bigger and giving them more data.
Technological advancement is exponential. Legal advancement is linear. The gap only grows bigger over time. The law hasn't even properly caught up to social media yet.
The main problem we have right now, is that SO MANY people are talking about 'AI' and want to give solutions for something they don't even understand. There is so much misinformation spreading about LLMs and similar technologies its mind blowing.
@@dragonfruitfan4894 that is only relatively true, there are things who have been found to be necessary for someone to be happy and AI takes away some of them
@@diamondmemer9754 It takes them away and replaces them with AI which is still "true happiness" albeit with AI components which again is still "true happiness"
This story is so old that it should even be called ancient: exponential raise of tech. The same argument, how much better computers are overall with growing speed, how much people fail to realize computers would be capable of, etc. We reached the moon like half a century ago...supposedly. Logically, many people expected humankind to colonize the moon by year 2000. Year 2000 was like mythological back in the 50's, 60's, 70's...until year 2000 arrived and found us fretting about computers unable to tell two numbers apart and the world would collapse, numbers being 1900 and 2000 just in case you forgot or don't know. It's been 24 years since 2000 and regular plane travel is a hassle and expensive. Most people in America will never travel to mundane destinations like Europe. Most Americans who have travelled extensively did so on the government budget (military service). Plenty of Americans have not even flown extensively across the USA, which includes white people, not just the usual suspects. I can go on forever. This hype is blown out, like always.
The only way it could be successfully regulated is if the world agrees. Every country knows that regulating themselves alone is just disadvantaging yourself - so they won't do it unless everyone does it (and then they'll just do it in secret).
Even advance technology has limitations, alot of us think digital technology has unlimited potential to grow on a deluded perspective and it does when you think of it. But I think reality wise AI is not so invincible at all and it's like the tech is directly hitting a brick wall without a well process thought. Therefore, it is flawed to an extent when left uncheck they can be very damaging.
Welcome to your worst nightmare Days are getting dark you should be scared It doesn’t have a heart Plug in to the new you Don’t resist because it’s no use It’s no use Is digital warfare The death of who we are is right here It’s never gonna stop Plug in to your new soul Ice-cold, mechanical, Artificial -Artifical by Chris Daughtry
People will respect human creators above the soulless AI, right up until people can't tell the difference. Creators, actors, reporters, they can soon all be "aped" to perfection, and then who needs humans for these roles? Modern music has a large, soulless component already; imagine when AI figures out the perfect music to entrance humans psychologically and render their minds as easy to manipulate as any politician could wish for--and that's just one form of art/entertainment that can be utilized to mold, not the public's opinion, but its deepest fears, needs and feelings. You'll believe you want this product, or this senator, and no one will convince you otherwise, and you'll have no idea that you've been ... changed. It's "Invasion of the Body Snatchers", only there's no need to replace your body when they have your mind. You will gladly go shopping, or to war; and it's likely that no one will even be talking about AI, that thing that never ended up being a threat at all.
4:15 yes, I have no doubt you could push a button and get a brand new movie from the book and you can switch out the actors, style, theme, you name it. Soon we will feed an AI the Shrek series and get the forbidden Shrek anime. We are truly cooked
Ok nice here's a brownie recipe Ingredients: - 1/2 cup (1 stick) unsalted butter - 1 cup granulated sugar - 2 large eggs - 1 teaspoon vanilla extract - 1/3 cup unsweetened cocoa powder - 1/2 cup all-purpose flour - 1/4 teaspoon salt - 1/4 teaspoon baking powder Optional Add-ins: - 1/2 cup chocolate chips or chunks - 1/2 cup chopped nuts (walnuts or pecans) Instructions: 1. **Preheat the Oven:** Preheat your oven to 350°F (175°C). Grease an 8x8-inch baking pan or line it with parchment paper. 2. **Melt the Butter:** In a medium saucepan over low heat, melt the butter. Remove from heat and let it cool slightly. 3. **Mix Wet Ingredients:** Stir in the sugar, eggs, and vanilla extract until well combined. 4. **Combine Dry Ingredients:** In a separate bowl, sift together the cocoa powder, flour, salt, and baking powder. 5. **Combine Wet and Dry Ingredients:** Gradually add the dry ingredients to the wet mixture, stirring until just combined. Do not overmix. Fold in the chocolate chips or nuts if using. 6. **Bake:** Pour the batter into the prepared baking pan and spread it evenly. Bake in the preheated oven for 20-25 minutes, or until a toothpick inserted into the center comes out with a few moist crumbs (not wet batter). 7. **Cool and Serve:** Let the brownies cool in the pan on a wire rack before cutting into squares. Enjoy! These brownies are Delicious
I just hope whatever future we are going in won't allow poverty. no more poor wages, no more things we can't afford. everyone can have anything they want, but nothing can be wasted. if you get something you have to keep it for as many years as it can last at good performance. stop consumerism together with poverty and unbalanced wages.
Sorry to tell you how either stupid or blissfully naive that idea is. We can end poverty and hunger right now we don't need AI. We need compassionate, non greedy humans in power. Never gonna happen
7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6
@@stereo-soulsoundsystem5070 Seems to me you're the short sighted and naive one. We can end poverty and hunger right now? In what fantasy? How absolutely ignorant.
to the ending point, AI doesnt care yet, but the whole idea is that one day it may be able to. And even if they are always doomed to know we created them, that fact alone may lead to the thought of them being part of evolution and somehow the logical next step
I'm so glad my art is real and has feelings and creativity mixed into it but i'm still scared it's not enough for ppl to be interested in... I love the content you make btw and would love an essay about the human brain bc both the universe and our brains copacity has always been the most scariest concept for me (brain also involves dreams and our mental stuff if you really want to go deep)
I promise you, your art has value and it’s important to create things and put emotions out into the world. We lowkey need that nowadays. I appreciate the support and that’s an interesting idea! I’ll look into it :)
@@spdsyt I think what you are doing is also art! You are also putting your emotions and thoughts into your creations which feels rare nowdays on youtube or just social media as a whole, I followed you bc of Minecraft aswell but i'm glad I stayed for these types of videos C:
What about AI powered weapons? That's the thing that concerns me the most. That's something that regulation does not fix, "if the US doesn't do it, China will"... I think regulation really needs to be handled by an indipendant board which is open to the community. But even then, what's to stop either country doing it in secret? What's to stop Russia doing it in the open and simply not giving a fuck whether or not it is considering it a war crime? So how do we NOT have a race to the bottom? I think that, at least with the US and China (Russia will still simply not care) IF they felt like they had a choice to not pursue that direction of development, if they both felt they could be confident the other is not secretly developing the most devastating and existentially-threatening weapon mankind has ever known, then they would choose the safer option to simply not make autonomous death machines. It's just that right now, in their eyes, ignoring everyone telling them how stupid that is and just doing it anyway seems like the safest option.
it is so good that it is terrifying - all we need to do is keep this very intelligent and unfiltered ai seperate from the public. we need it to resch many goals, but some people are so terrible that they'd use it against ourselves.
11:45 I’ve heard AI is already creating music, poems, short stories, where is the limit to AI’s creative ability. Now there’s even robot dogs that use AI to gather tons of data faster then any human could ever do and respond accordingly
when i have kids AI will bee making movies and they won't know what true movies will feel like because all of the AI's movies are soulless so im gonna force them to watch old movies and not the AI stuff
Most people who dismiss the dangers of AI are either: 1) examples of normalcy bias, or 2) not thinking things through to the next, and the next, and the next ….
Recommendation algorithms are addictive enough. Imaging it would start generating content ideal for your tastes? Why just don't connect computer to the brain so it would know directly what you want to most, even if you don't know it yourself, and make an input to your senses that would be absolute bliss. But why to even use senses? You could send the feeling of pleasure directly to the brain. The way technologies are developing is absolutely insane and not necessary. You can experience more pleasure than your brain is capable for. If you start experience it constantly, it will become a norm and boring. I think this whole technology thing is stupid. We should live like Amish or something, they are not less happy than we are, but it will be hard for us to change what we addicted to.
I have a feeling that it will just take away all jobs. And owners will not care. No matter how many companies I have worked for, they all just keep restructuring and automating and removing "excess". When I started in 1996, it was obviously already underway for a good while but in today's environment, it could hit from one year to the other with massive consequences. I'm not sure it's the bright future we have been waiting for.
AI is problem in capitalism and there are two solutions: Ban ai (which is practically impossible, companies will still do it in secret), or abolish capitalism
I wonder if the first thing you would do is abolish copyright and patents. Open ideas where people linked together on a project. This kind of project idea thinking it's called an exquisite corpse in art. Building on someone else's ideas. Will we all have the ability to live good lives and be creative.
@@RolferShannon Universal Basic Income, for one. Capitalism has only been the best stratagem for distributing and processing resources to benefit the majority of humanity for the time it has been around. With AI, there's no need for capitalism at all, as AI has no need for money, and pretty much all jobs involving resource gathering or processing will be automated, so things will be forced to be closer to that of Star Trek than anything else, unless humanity at large fancies self-annihilation.
Just had a thought about this and it was realy bad. Think about an AI generated video of a false flag attack and this being used for grounds for an invasion of another country (maybe Greece or Turkey as poor living conditions only get forgotten with patriotic war and all that caz or a war between Serbs and some of the countries they border)
Just the same as how industrialisation caused Malthusian crises and an excuse to compete with each other for resources, or how the advent of farming caused more cohesive groups of people that could fight larger scale wars (you could probably name better examples than I have). Will AI cause another burst in international tensions, and if so, how bad will it be?
@@antarcticmapper3460 I fear that it won't be a war and more like a silent takeover of our way of thinking. Many use television to see news or get information and we know how bad it is now think about AI creating same situation for the internet. A war is possible but information war is for sure a reality
AI is shit. It will be used for shit things too. We're fucked. Given two potential paths, one where AI helps people and one where it is used to create a dystopian nightmare, it's always, ALWAYS going to end up being the dystopian nightmare, because everything is so utterly shit these days and there is never any hope of it ever getting better.
I would love AI to become our competitors in survival. Because maybe, it will teach humans to work together rather than against each other. Why fight over land when your species is being threatened with extinction?
"The advance of human technology has not been matched by corresponding advance of human wisdom."
Wise words
human wisdom is too slow, if we depend on it we will never progress faster. i wanna be alive to see a frutiger aero utopia.
look humans arent so smart but also not completely irrational, AI hardly will be used for bad or will even turn bad. humans trains AI to be better than humans, to be more fair than humans and to just do the right thing that humans often would not.
AI rn is just a tool but if someday become sentient and all, i will respect as i respect any other living being. humans have no exclusivity, just a little more processing power than other species.
this is much like the second industrial revolution... AI is as big evolution factor as discovering how to make fire.
@@jktech2117 That's not gonna happen thanks to the apathy and greed of corporations. Digital tech will improve with the standard 40% per year, while other companies will remain at 5~10% per decade. This advancement disparity will cascade through society and effect human behavior, will, opinions, the economy, society, jobs, nature, and more, acting as a catalyst for the problems and further boosting disparity in advancement, and not in a stable way either. This will result in dystopia and catastrophic missed opportunities for improvement if left unchecked. That's why it's in our best interests to activate the necessary operation
@@UhmAhctually dont forget many big corporations are actually suffering due to AI or soon will.
what you think that will be left of media if u can generate whatever you want to consume? google is already getting a hit cuz chatgpt is already better than them to search stuff.
"We are now Gods, but for the wisdom"
The bleak reality of AI kinda set in a couple months ago. One of my professors, who has decades of experience in law enforcement and subcontracting for attorneys told us that video evidence may become completely inadmissable in court. The scarier thought though, is that gap in between the actual legislation targeting AI video in court, where an AI generated video could genuinely put somebody behind bars for a significant period of time. The thought of being able to ruin someone's life with a simple prompt within the near future terrifies me to the bone.
Even more dystopian, imagine the government intentionally leaves that gap open so it can just determine which evidence is real and which isn't to its own convenience
@@umaru1942 Good lord, I genuinely rather not even think about that right now. That’s some scary stuff.
That's very scary on many levels. Video evidence aids access to justice in a lot of contexts including protecting the most vulnerable, on either side of any scenario.
@@umaru1942 What if they start using AI themselves to determine whether it's real or not?
Though, as someone who wants to make a name for themselves, the idea of any opposition being able to ruin my life in an instant is terrifying. How do people not see this? In the future, no people may ever want to do anything for this exact reason.
OpenAI's CEO looks so terrified by his own creation in these interviews it's almost uncanny
I'm so fed up with people like him crying over how dangerous AI is, then casually proceeding to code more of them.
lol he sounds like a 9 year old kid after watching a corpse husband among us video 😂
@@alphasaft2130 They aren't dangerous. They are in fact very ineffective at what they are supposed to be doing. He is just trying to sell shares. Saying that it's this dangerous makes it look like the AI he is creating has potential and will there by gain the interest of people with money.
Denmark, the danish government. Literally just bought this whole AI setup to help with governmental and healthcare tasks
AI is still not good at anything other than maybe being an upgrade to AI's in computer games.
Then stop making it better for fuck's sake
@@alphasaft2130 sam Altman wants regulatory capture
Ai when I spill water on their servers:
Me, God's strongest soldier and comically large magnet owner VS the Antichrist disguised as generative AI
@iamondmemer9754 for real, pull a big win for humanity against the forces of the devil and his Ai lies. You know what to do!
@@julioflorescertifiedtherap1425 all jokes aside AI needs to be kept in check or it will destroy us
@@diamondmemer9754How big is your comically biggest magnet?
AI will get so smart that robots will build robots and they will think everything thru so they make it water resistant
Main issue for AI for me that no one is talking about, as a programmer, are the ‘model collapse’
Think of it as scanning a photo, you use the human data to copy it, but… what happens when you copy the copied photo? It loses quality, it’s been studied multiple times. Even something simple as text is prone to this
No matter the quality, it just happens, degrade the model…
The only known way is to set data before 2023, but then… everything will be outdated
There’s many research documents on this, recommend looking it up, it’s a cool rabbit hole I went down
My God, A.I is inbreeding.
Ive actually wondered about this. Thanks for the terminology name.
Ai inbreeding. It's funny, but is a strikingly good analogy. If you copy the "genetic" information enough times, making a couple mistakes, those mistakes will be copied.
The AI inbreeding will slow down advancements, which is good. We will need to adapt and also figure out how AI learns and interface with it properly. Musk is offering free DNI installations. We are running out of energy also, so we will have time to figure things out.
Experts aren't exactly sure whether or not this will be an issue going forward. There are many different techniques that can regularize the data and prevent this kind of degradation. That being said, we are running out of data to be trained on in the first place. It's no surprise why OpenAI's GPT-4 has stagnated and instead been made multi-modal. Building out the other low hanging fruit is easier to do while you wait for quality data to be collected. *cough cough* (like the data they are getting from people using Chat GPT)
We've opened Pandora's Box, but it turns out the box was just filled with shit. That grows and spreads exponentially.
Original Pandora's box contained sickness, death and many other unspecified evils, so pretty accurate
If thats all the Ai is to you then there truly is no need to worry if that's all it is. The problem here is that people like you are completely and utterly wrong. AI is far more than just that, its far more powerful, far more capable and therefore far more revolutionary (whether in a good or bad way). Make sure not to underestimate it.
Ai is nothing but a digital thief
Bros gonna be the first person killed by AI xd
Most definitely
as someone who wants to pursue animation as a future job, AI actually terrifies me, I love animation, and would love to do it for a living, but I'm afraid by the time I'm qualified to animate in a studio my passion will be null void because AI would take my job for me. Its scary knowing your job can just be taken by AI. Personally I would wish for a world without AI, but I know that won't happen. No matter what I will never give up my dream until AI forcefully rips it out of my hands.
AI can solve alot of problems. But I have a feeling it will create more problems than it solves.
@@unikqefox_1576 It can solve all the problems we have. Although most would not agree with the terror it would inflict to achieve it.
AI fear mongering. Yeah there’s real concerns to have but much of media is very sensationalized
NSFW for AI
18±
Impending Storm
Inevitable
Regulation favors Government
Unfiltered favors Everyone
Always has been
Mark my words this TH-camr is going to become so much bigger. Just keep making the videos you are 💯
what makes ai dangerous is how people will use it, take this as a scenario of everybody having nuke buttons, either noone presses it or everyone presses is in hope of being last one to survive.
in one way or another, humans are dangerous. ai is a tool like pencil you can make drawings but also you can go jhon wick.
Its the "make a video of vladamir putin declaring nuclear war on the us" type of videos that are scary but i'd like to think that whenever AI makes any sort of video it has some sort of serial number in it that can be detected by other AI softwares, sort of like how viruses are made by humans but we overcame them by having other humans make counter virus measures. I think it'll be reigned in, every time theres a big leap in technology we all get scared because its the unknown. people were scared of Y2k in the same way
I don't think thats the best analogy, I think the overuse of antibiotics and gain-of-function research is more accurate.
@@12pentaborane no like ai cant learn how to learn nor it can produce something new by itself, its always humans and will be humans, even in the earlier machine revolution people were worried about and even started fighting for machines replacing humans yet the machines didnt replace them if was humans that used machines similarly its for ai. its nothing dangerous but what makes it dangerous is that instead of requiring huge group people some will be able to carry the tasks with more efficiency anyway these ai only reduce the cost put into doing same work and time ofcourse.
@@hmmmmmm_3429 If you can train the AI with enough data, it can make new concepts. A human baby isn't coming up with anything, but as it learns what it's predecessors done before (statistics, math, science) they can apply it. Our body perceives the world and that influences our decisions and we learn off that. An AI model can't really walk or whatnot and perceive it's environment so of course it can't learn out of nothing. It's almost like a brain.
I don't think AI will be dangerous, it will be another tool for everyone to use like google translator. It didn't put any one out jobs, and I really doubt we as people would allow AI to drive vehicles right now. It's gonna be at least another decade or two.
@@hmmmmmm_3429 yes but humans don't maek new things our selves iether not rreally we just take things and re mix it etc
The inflection point arises when the default mindset flips from ' This video was most likely made by a real person' to 'this video was most likely made by AI' when this point arrives depends on how much 'critical mass' AI generated content achieves- but that it will arrive seems to me inevitable unless some foolproof way is found to clealy label generated content as AI.
But there are huge sums of money being invested in this labelling not happening because those who would profit from using Gen AI intutively understand that being forced to label it would make it less appealing and effective.
It seems inevitable to me that there will be an arms race between the improvement of AI and the effectiveness of labelling such AI. Is there a point where we can no longer improve AI and it will eventually stabilise, or will AI grow forever?
Also, I think this “inflection point” has already happened. AI can make human essays, and make designs that most people don’t recognise as AI (just look at Temu lol). Let’s just hope that AI can only go so far…
@@antarcticmapper3460 I think you are right technically- already most people can't tell AI Art or Writing from Human made Art or Writing- but I think the general mindset is still very much of the view that if something looks human made it then it is human made. The real problems will start when this baseline assumption is no longer safe to make and we will all be forced to adopt a 'safety first' approach that everything is AI generated until proven otherwise.
Also the issue is not only technical- there is real resistance on the part of advertising agencies and other media creators to being forced to label their content as AI generated- I think because knowing something is fake changes your relationship to the material in a negative way, and the Agencies would rather not have to tell their target audiences that they are using fake media- they would rather just put it out there and keep quiet about it.
The only solution at the moment is to label this content as AI. It is not an action that can be undone, and people will obviously use it maliciously, whether at a small scale or large, if the technology is there. Shouldn’t the agencies sympathise with OpenAI? And should they simply stop using AI altogether? Once again human greed comes to ruin everything…
@@antarcticmapper3460I think you are right- unless AI generated content is clearly labeled as such we are going to have real problems in the near future with trust in any kind of media- but I am also aware that this labelling will potentialy damage the commercial application of AI generated material, because it's essentially a label that says 'this content is fake!', which is a negative attribute.
So while there are powerful social arguements in favour of clearly identifying AI generated content- there are also powerful commercial interests that will oppose this because they feel it will prevent them from fully exploiting the commercial advantages of using AI. One argument I have heard from the Advertising agencies is that AI is no different to Photoshop- and since they are currently not obliged to declare when Photoshop has been used to manipulate an image, why then should they be obliged to declare when AI is used to create an image?
Personally I don't find this arguement convincing- there is a big difference between retouching a real photograph and generating a completely fake photograph in my view- but the fact that arguements like this are being made does reveal the reluctuance of some potential disseminators of AI Generated content to label that content clearly.
I agree with you. AI is an incredibly powerful tool that can manipulate almost anyone if used correctly. Especially as AI will ultimately improve, and the labelling of AI proves to fail. Also, photoshop actually requires human intuition and inconvenience that most people aren’t willing to do and AI is just a matter of prompting, generating a couple of fake videos and then choosing the right one, making AI much more accessible.
We just have to hope that more powerful forms of AI will only fall into the right hands (these trusted companies) if labelling is abolished. That way we know it is AI out of the reputation of the company.
Your editing is next level, great job as always
Thanks dandunt! I’m glad you liked it!
@@spdsyt teach me bro 😭🙏
It was done by AI
We might even do the ah oh we unlock the singularity and lose all of our progress in cells to singularity and have to gain all of our progress
In real life
We might accidentally destroy the observable universe
With a stupid ai
You can always see Sam looking sorry for opening pandora's box
ZEUS!!!
Came to your channel two years ago for the Minecraft content, stayed for the in-depth video essays!!
Glad you still like it! Thanks for your support seriously.
gotta love the fact that sam altman is concerned, yet doesn't think of maybe just stopping his research on ai
Absolute hypocrite that guy is
@@TheDoomMasterjuice
He's really yapping about that it could end the world and says well anyways let's move on
@@europeanguy5156 real 🤥🤥🤥
Rather a carefull man managing progress than a loot goblin
They've said not to make ai so bad, yet we dont listen, about to make a sequel to i haveno mouth and i must scream
Fr
Bold of you to assume that humans ever cared about the consequences of their actions. They don't, never have and never will, even when it's too late.
@@Piss_Off_Plz yeah true
@@Piss_Off_Plz gonna make the sequel to i have mouth and i must scream
Shut up and Praise Roko
5:40 I think you summoned me with that music bud
Omori Whitespace
At first, I thought this was another AI-hate and fear-mongering video, but as I kept watching, it was well researched and showed concern and opinion from both sides, showing different aspects of this technology. The research is even better than that of some casual AI enthusiasts, but then it went downhill when you talk about “the truth," which is already covered in other parts of the video, but it went uphill again and ended with a positive, hopeful, and neutral ending. The editing of the video is also phenomenal and very engaging. Overall, it’s a great video. ❤
Thanks for that! I see now what you mean and you’re right about the downhill part. I just wanted to clear it up I guess
With all those higher-ups showing even a bit of concern? Reminds me of Spec Ops the Line: "I never meant to hurt anybody." -"Nobody ever does."
humans in 2042 using water balloons against the giant mechs
I already know that some form of harm will come of it overall and I don’t want to be reminded.
Maybe if you're aware of it, you can do something about it. (Or at least protect yourself from it.)
Don't say you'll never be so influential, because it's possible. All you have to do is try.
@@unikqefox_1576Wtf he's gonna do? Are you dense? 🥱
I started doomsday prepping as a hobby and ‘joke’ about nuclear war being in our future - now I do it because of the fuckin Terminator 😂
"Thresholds and upper limits are invisible until encountered."
"Nothing ever happens."
Imagine when we get to the point where instead of talking to chat gpt we can tell it "make me a soulslike videogame with difficult but fair bosses and enemies" and it generates an entire videogame before your eyes in a matter of minutes
But anyways, robot Girlfriends when?
character ai is already there
Already is here
So we just tryna smash instead of making inventions that will actually help humanity
cool
@@quincho6949Cai is quite basic as of right now, the relationship bots are basically incapable of doing anything but kissing and cuddling and whatever else endlessly.
Hey I am a bit late, however I am a datascience enthusiast.
You were mostly talking about the capability of generative ai. This is an interesting field, however not nearly as interesting/intimidating as time series, recommendation systems or even reinforcement learning models. These are very nerdy things, however can even predict data through time,
and decisions that will be made.
What’s probably even scarier is that the first ai software to become self aware probably won’t tell anyone it’s self aware
You act like an ai would think like a human. If it’s programmed to tell us whether its conscious or not then it will, end of story. As long as it cant edit its programming (not that it has a reason to. Its a Robot, remember) it will do whatever we tell it. Dangerous ai only comes when we tell it to be human and then we tell it to get better.
Now its goal to be emotional and secretive and angry and the whole host of human emotions. This is a surprisingly avoidable outcome.
Be robot
Dont change
there won't be any self aware AI, no matter how fast the progress goes, AI is a massive line of achievements and we are not close to self awareness at all
Last weekend me and a classmate made a presentation for school and searched up a template for PowerPoint. There was a picture of a guy in it who was labelled Matthew and we thought it was really funny so we searched him up and it came out he was AI generated. I NEVER WOULD HAVE KNOWN HE LOOKS SO REAL WHAT
Be on guard humanity. We have a habit of getting carried away with events that don't mean us well.
One argument that has always soothed my worries about AI is that it can only learn from what humans have already made. Every day creators around the world are evolving new sounds, visuals, and stories that will transcend anything before it. AI won't be able to truly reinvent itself if it continues to only learn from what has been made.
This is true, ai can’t exactly leave the box. Yet at least. It will always be confined by the box of knowledge. That’s what makes humans so special is our ability to extend outside the box.
But at what point is the AI the reference? At which point it will keep building upon itself until it will grow infinitely. I’m pretty sure AI has the capability to mutate and evolve itself over time.
1. What about Synthetic Data?
2. Anthropic's new Claude Opus AI is showing sines of Sapience.
@@spdsyt AI: *develops the ability to leave the box in 2030*
People: *fear and panic intensifies*
Ever biological being on this planet: *does absolutely nothing to improve and adapt, doesn't even abolish overripe issues and remains ignorant until faced with the danger, and proceeds to take the worst approach as a resonse*
Corporations: *laughs while AI, and 400 opinionated groups argue amongst eachother on social media, stupidly unaware that it was a corporate who's doing all this, not a glorified computer program*
I always thought that if humans can do it, why can’t AI. All humans are is a collection of neurons interacting in a special way so if computers can replicate that, shouldn’t they be able to achieve the same thought processes as we can? Although, it would take a while to achieve that computing power and lots of research into new techniques, I believe it should still be possible.
I’m not the smartest person in the world, but I always knew AI was a bad idea, so apparently I’m the smartest person in the world
It's the best idea possible, if you consider humans to be special in any way. In the current form, humans will not be anything more than any other animal on earth, more intelligent, yes, but still be a species on this small planet doing nothing more than not getting extinct until it finally goes extinct.
That makes sense yeah
I knew once I found out about AI art/videos
You're not smart, you're a npc lmao 🤣
One thing I can say is that we as people commonly throw away trends. Ai is a trend. While it’s big enough to get as bad as predicted, it’s likely that we will discard it at some point. It won’t be as new. It won’t be as exciting. Theres the chance that it will be shoved away into a corner of the internet and technological development until it’s repopularized and brought back into the public eye. We need to remember natural human behavior past corruption. We need to remember the masses.
*Generative AI. My worry is AI will be used more and take over analyzing data from people, and the results it produces won't be questioned by humans.
Agreed. The same happened with VR, AR and Crypto. I still wish the Warp Drive becomes humanity's latest invention one day, instead of ASI.
@@vivaelguion You cant compare those things to AI. Because Ai has real potential to have as much impact as the Industrial Revolution and the invention of computers
@@stagnant-name5851 What about the warp drive?
@@vivaelguioncrypto isn't done yet, there will be a 2nd wave next year
The CEO of ChatGPT/OpenAI carries a panic button that essentially will detonate all of the servers that the AI operates from if things go out of hand. The fact that he has counter measures for if AI goes rogue scares me
as if that isn't going to be compromised. i'm with you
don't be too bothered about it. He has trauma from events in his life, so something that he can't have control over scares him immensely.
I doubt that's true. Even if it is, by out of hand do you mean _omg ChatGPT has hacked Sam Altman's phone._
@@synchc no, there are robots already being built, going rogue means "omg that robot has a gun!!" then robs a bank or something. so I wouldn't be surprised if there is a panic button.
Oh shut the fuck up with your bullshit. This is not a movie lol
It's more than likely just going to collapse the internet.
The amount of bots on the internet already constitutes for like 75% of internet traffic.
What happens when it's 80%? 90%? 99%?
Remember that our internet, the cloud, is still based in physical supercomputers and servers owned by tech companies and governments. Hardware that can only be expanded so far.
At what point do the servers get overloaded? At what point, do we reach critical mass?
I'm personally terrified of people making super graphic horror films like the Saw series. And then people watching it, getting some form of Ptsd from seeing things that the human brain cannot distinguish from real life, for example 😅
Love your vids.. Man great content and excellent descriptions and narration.. I really want to get onto making a channel with content like this but I don't think I could talk like you though...
You can do it! It’s taken me many years to get to editing like this I started off making horrible videos. Just try it! Your first video WILL suck but if you like it that shouldn’t matter
Use chat gpt 4
How to stop AI?
Cut off the electricity supply to it ✅✅
It might not be the Minecraft contant but I think I came back here in the right moment of this channel's lifetime. The explanations are simple, yet it's a good way to recap on everythig in AI industry so far. And even if generative content replaces most of the internet we use right now, I think I am glad to know that I'll have this channel to come back to one day. Keep up the good work, don't let news discourage you, it's about creating something, even if it's not perfect, as once it happened before with loosing a fight to a chess computer it didn't stop anyone from playing, and so we shouldn't stop creating something new.
I dont play on stopping :) thanks for this comment it means alot, seriously! Im glad you can gain something from my content :)
To think that we all were at some point hoping the future would be flying cars and stuff, now all it brings me is fear. I hate the thought of AI and Technology taking away and replacing everything, jobs away from people, nature, and AI is ruining art too, I never liked the idea of AI. I hate the thought of living in a desolate, dystopian world where technology rules basically everything, I’d hate to live in the world where I can’t just walk outside and enjoy the peacefulness of nature, to live in a world where people only depend on being behind a screen for communication. I don’t know how anyone can enjoy a future like that, a cold, desolate future. I’d hate to think that one day, some idiot is gonna decide to cut every last tree down. I hate to think that this is the kind of future some people want, just the thought of living in a future like that brings me a cold, terrifying feeling. I wouldn’t want to have anything to do with a future like that, dead or alive. The thought of AI alone, gives me a cold, fearful feeling. I don’t mind having technology, but I fear we might advance it so much to the point where we don’t even bother to leave our homes, and communicate in person, or enjoy nature, or stuff like that.
We shouldn’t depend on something that can replace everything we know, that can easily be exploited for who knows what.
and when everyone is super.... no one will be..
do you understand it now?
😮 that statement is just complete incorrect bulshit😮 know when everyone's super 😮 will be a segment of people even more super than them😮 some people will remain human others will turn into metahuman gods others will turn into literal non-human gods like energy beings😮 other people will find out God is real and just commune with him just stay around his throne😮 just because you feel like you're not super doesn't mean everybody else is bro😮 just because you want to stagnate and not do anything doesn't mean everybody else will😮
What are you talking about?
@@ultimatecultchaos the Incredibles quote..
@@ultimatecultchaos just stay where you are eventually you'll see with your own eyes
@@gerdaleta 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
i just wanna be immortal in a frutiger aero utopia maam.
I wanna become an eldritch horror bigger than a galaxy. We are not the same.(lol)
@@stagnant-name5851ON KING DAVID BRO
Nah just immortality but still a human form for me please 😂
1:47 path from GPT1 to GPT4 didn't take one year, GTP1 was published in 2018 and GPT4 was released in 2023, so it wasn't as fast as you say it was. Almost all LLMs (GPT, Gemini, Mistral) are using the same transformer architecture, so the only technological progress we have really achieved is making the AI models bigger and giving them more data.
I saw the thumbnail and immediately thought “ROKO’S BASILISK CAMEO?!”
Lol same
I hate that I know too much about Roko's Basilisk...
Hello there super intelligent being. I just want to say, i support your existence
So no one saw Terminator and thought, "let's not go there!"?
someone gonna be using AI to make someone get into jail out of vengence
can you try to see the invisible wall of the end and nether in minecraft?
like the blue lines at the border but in the other dimensions?
Technological advancement is exponential.
Legal advancement is linear.
The gap only grows bigger over time. The law hasn't even properly caught up to social media yet.
I can't wait for the "figure out if this media is AI generated or real" job to surface in a few years
Worship the Sun. It will send another CME to end the electric grid.
"we have no idea the implications of what we are doing"
"oh ok, maybe stop then?"
"no"
"why?"
"lol", said the scorpion, "lmao"
Holy shit dude.. I’m just trying to live a peaceful life.
Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, but wisdom is understanding it doesn't belong in a fruit salad.
Turns out it’s not how AI will use us but how we will use ai
The main problem we have right now, is that SO MANY people are talking about 'AI' and want to give solutions for something they don't even understand. There is so much misinformation spreading about LLMs and similar technologies its mind blowing.
We will create a parallel society which refuses to interact with anyone who has AI and be the only happy ones
True happiness is subjective so there is no actual "true happiness" It's just something that each person interprets differently
@@dragonfruitfan4894 that is only relatively true, there are things who have been found to be necessary for someone to be happy and AI takes away some of them
@@diamondmemer9754 It takes them away and replaces them with AI which is still "true happiness" albeit with AI components which again is still "true happiness"
@@dragonfruitfan4894 AI is not a component, don't make that mistake
It doesn't help humans, it replaces them
@@diamondmemer9754 Right. that really isn't a bad thing once you consider the labor benefits replacing humans comes with
This story is so old that it should even be called ancient: exponential raise of tech. The same argument, how much better computers are overall with growing speed, how much people fail to realize computers would be capable of, etc.
We reached the moon like half a century ago...supposedly. Logically, many people expected humankind to colonize the moon by year 2000. Year 2000 was like mythological back in the 50's, 60's, 70's...until year 2000 arrived and found us fretting about computers unable to tell two numbers apart and the world would collapse, numbers being 1900 and 2000 just in case you forgot or don't know.
It's been 24 years since 2000 and regular plane travel is a hassle and expensive. Most people in America will never travel to mundane destinations like Europe. Most Americans who have travelled extensively did so on the government budget (military service). Plenty of Americans have not even flown extensively across the USA, which includes white people, not just the usual suspects.
I can go on forever. This hype is blown out, like always.
The only way it could be successfully regulated is if the world agrees. Every country knows that regulating themselves alone is just disadvantaging yourself - so they won't do it unless everyone does it (and then they'll just do it in secret).
That will never happen because there will always be the greedy once, you know them, right?
Even advance technology has limitations, alot of us think digital technology has unlimited potential to grow on a deluded perspective and it does when you think of it. But I think reality wise AI is not so invincible at all and it's like the tech is directly hitting a brick wall without a well process thought. Therefore, it is flawed to an extent when left uncheck they can be very damaging.
This is a film
That’s such a huge compliment thank you so much!
@@spdsyt thanks to your amazing content!
The way you concluded this video makes my think that you have never heard of the game "I have no mouth and i must scream."
well its bin a good run but we don't have to pay bills
I felt like the video ended like 3 times before it actually ends
6:14 ayo what's ROGUE SAMURAI doing??
0:30 a guy with such a strong vocal fry terrifies me more than his AI :'D
"AI is not real". But what happens when AI is put into Robotic bodies that interact with the Physical world?
thats already happened.
That's called an android. Also ai is just a cheep way of coding that way you can be Lazyer and let the AI do the codding for you .
Great editing, and I can imagine and respect the 200+ hours of work behind it. Thanks for a great human made video!
Welcome to your worst nightmare
Days are getting dark you should be scared
It doesn’t have a heart
Plug in to the new you
Don’t resist because it’s no use
It’s no use
Is digital warfare
The death of who we are is right here
It’s never gonna stop
Plug in to your new soul
Ice-cold, mechanical, Artificial
-Artifical by Chris Daughtry
AI Copolit, Gemini and Claude continues to interrupt my mobile phone service and functionality in search of retrieving data. We're in trouble!
People will respect human creators above the soulless AI, right up until people can't tell the difference. Creators, actors, reporters, they can soon all be "aped" to perfection, and then who needs humans for these roles? Modern music has a large, soulless component already; imagine when AI figures out the perfect music to entrance humans psychologically and render their minds as easy to manipulate as any politician could wish for--and that's just one form of art/entertainment that can be utilized to mold, not the public's opinion, but its deepest fears, needs and feelings. You'll believe you want this product, or this senator, and no one will convince you otherwise, and you'll have no idea that you've been ... changed. It's "Invasion of the Body Snatchers", only there's no need to replace your body when they have your mind. You will gladly go shopping, or to war; and it's likely that no one will even be talking about AI, that thing that never ended up being a threat at all.
4:15 yes, I have no doubt you could push a button and get a brand new movie from the book and you can switch out the actors, style, theme, you name it.
Soon we will feed an AI the Shrek series and get the forbidden Shrek anime.
We are truly cooked
Ok nice here's a brownie recipe
Ingredients:
- 1/2 cup (1 stick) unsalted butter
- 1 cup granulated sugar
- 2 large eggs
- 1 teaspoon vanilla extract
- 1/3 cup unsweetened cocoa powder
- 1/2 cup all-purpose flour
- 1/4 teaspoon salt
- 1/4 teaspoon baking powder
Optional Add-ins:
- 1/2 cup chocolate chips or chunks
- 1/2 cup chopped nuts (walnuts or pecans)
Instructions:
1. **Preheat the Oven:**
Preheat your oven to 350°F (175°C). Grease an 8x8-inch baking pan or line it with parchment paper.
2. **Melt the Butter:**
In a medium saucepan over low heat, melt the butter. Remove from heat and let it cool slightly.
3. **Mix Wet Ingredients:**
Stir in the sugar, eggs, and vanilla extract until well combined.
4. **Combine Dry Ingredients:**
In a separate bowl, sift together the cocoa powder, flour, salt, and baking powder.
5. **Combine Wet and Dry Ingredients:**
Gradually add the dry ingredients to the wet mixture, stirring until just combined. Do not overmix. Fold in the chocolate chips or nuts if using.
6. **Bake:**
Pour the batter into the prepared baking pan and spread it evenly. Bake in the preheated oven for 20-25 minutes, or until a toothpick inserted into the center comes out with a few moist crumbs (not wet batter).
7. **Cool and Serve:**
Let the brownies cool in the pan on a wire rack before cutting into squares. Enjoy!
These brownies are Delicious
ai is about to unlock a new human ability of telling whats real and what isnt in a whole other level
I just hope whatever future we are going in won't allow poverty.
no more poor wages, no more things we can't afford.
everyone can have anything they want, but nothing can be wasted.
if you get something you have to keep it for as many years as it can last at good performance.
stop consumerism together with poverty and unbalanced wages.
Ok commie.
Sorry to tell you how either stupid or blissfully naive that idea is. We can end poverty and hunger right now we don't need AI. We need compassionate, non greedy humans in power. Never gonna happen
@@stereo-soulsoundsystem5070 Seems to me you're the short sighted and naive one. We can end poverty and hunger right now? In what fantasy? How absolutely ignorant.
Teh government creates poverty , so yes, we could it end now.
"Hope in one hand and sh*t in the other. See which one fills up faster."
I got an add of snoop dogg reading the Bible before this video
to the ending point, AI doesnt care yet, but the whole idea is that one day it may be able to. And even if they are always doomed to know we created them, that fact alone may lead to the thought of them being part of evolution and somehow the logical next step
This channel deserves so much more love from the public.
Ai itself is not evil it is us
bro thinks the ai will kill everyone except 5 people
I'm so glad my art is real and has feelings and creativity mixed into it but i'm still scared it's not enough for ppl to be interested in... I love the content you make btw and would love an essay about the human brain bc both the universe and our brains copacity has always been the most scariest concept for me (brain also involves dreams and our mental stuff if you really want to go deep)
I promise you, your art has value and it’s important to create things and put emotions out into the world. We lowkey need that nowadays. I appreciate the support and that’s an interesting idea! I’ll look into it :)
@@spdsyt I think what you are doing is also art! You are also putting your emotions and thoughts into your creations which feels rare nowdays on youtube or just social media as a whole, I followed you bc of Minecraft aswell but i'm glad I stayed for these types of videos C:
I'm worried about the A.I. in concert with Quantum computers...
*looking at rope*
“Eh, screw it, im taking myself before AI takes me”
gay dash
ikr the world sucked enough as it was
What about AI powered weapons? That's the thing that concerns me the most. That's something that regulation does not fix, "if the US doesn't do it, China will"... I think regulation really needs to be handled by an indipendant board which is open to the community. But even then, what's to stop either country doing it in secret? What's to stop Russia doing it in the open and simply not giving a fuck whether or not it is considering it a war crime? So how do we NOT have a race to the bottom?
I think that, at least with the US and China (Russia will still simply not care) IF they felt like they had a choice to not pursue that direction of development, if they both felt they could be confident the other is not secretly developing the most devastating and existentially-threatening weapon mankind has ever known, then they would choose the safer option to simply not make autonomous death machines.
It's just that right now, in their eyes, ignoring everyone telling them how stupid that is and just doing it anyway seems like the safest option.
it is so good that it is terrifying - all we need to do is keep this very intelligent and unfiltered ai seperate from the public. we need it to resch many goals, but some people are so terrible that they'd use it against ourselves.
We're at the point where is no ethical use of AI anymore, seperate from the public or not. You're either against human extinction or with it now.
4:01 *Looks at test 1*
He's a good 4-D boy! Yes he is! Who's a good 4-D Doggers? You Are!
DOMAIN MENTIONED?! DOMAIN EXPNSION: INFINITE AI
11:45 I’ve heard AI is already creating music, poems, short stories, where is the limit to AI’s creative ability. Now there’s even robot dogs that use AI to gather tons of data faster then any human could ever do and respond accordingly
when i have kids AI will bee making movies and they won't know what true movies will feel like because all of the AI's movies are soulless so im gonna force them to watch old movies and not the AI stuff
Soulless to us. But probably not soulless to their generation. It is what it is
"You see, back in my day..."
Most people who dismiss the dangers of AI are either: 1) examples of normalcy bias, or 2) not thinking things through to the next, and the next, and the next ….
Recommendation algorithms are addictive enough. Imaging it would start generating content ideal for your tastes? Why just don't connect computer to the brain so it would know directly what you want to most, even if you don't know it yourself, and make an input to your senses that would be absolute bliss. But why to even use senses? You could send the feeling of pleasure directly to the brain. The way technologies are developing is absolutely insane and not necessary. You can experience more pleasure than your brain is capable for. If you start experience it constantly, it will become a norm and boring. I think this whole technology thing is stupid. We should live like Amish or something, they are not less happy than we are, but it will be hard for us to change what we addicted to.
have you forgotten we can create small bombs? enought to be held in a hand and kill anything within 10 feet
The ending is such a cope. Humans are soulless neural networks as well. We differ from AI by simply being biological and more limited.
Your so smart. Look everyone, look at this really smart person who also gets all the ladies.
@@dallassegno Thanks 🥰
@@dallassegno When you want to make fun of someone by sarcastically calling them smart, at least use the right "your' and "you're."
Probably we are the intelligence itself and we don't like this being taken from our hands lol
10:57 by the same reasoning, we are just a bunch of deterministic atoms... (Fatalism)
The thumbnail goes hard
I have a feeling that it will just take away all jobs. And owners will not care. No matter how many companies I have worked for, they all just keep restructuring and automating and removing "excess". When I started in 1996, it was obviously already underway for a good while but in today's environment, it could hit from one year to the other with massive consequences. I'm not sure it's the bright future we have been waiting for.
AI is problem in capitalism and there are two solutions: Ban ai (which is practically impossible, companies will still do it in secret), or abolish capitalism
What would abolishing capitalism even look like? How would you start?
I wonder if the first thing you would do is abolish copyright and patents. Open ideas where people linked together on a project. This kind of project idea thinking it's called an exquisite corpse in art. Building on someone else's ideas. Will we all have the ability to live good lives and be creative.
@@RolferShannon don’t worry, AI will teach us how to abolish capitalism 😅
@@RolferShannon Universal Basic Income, for one. Capitalism has only been the best stratagem for distributing and processing resources to benefit the majority of humanity for the time it has been around. With AI, there's no need for capitalism at all, as AI has no need for money, and pretty much all jobs involving resource gathering or processing will be automated, so things will be forced to be closer to that of Star Trek than anything else, unless humanity at large fancies self-annihilation.
Chat GPT 1.0 was longer ago than a year and Will Smith eating spaghetti was way longer ago
Just had a thought about this and it was realy bad. Think about an AI generated video of a false flag attack and this being used for grounds for an invasion of another country (maybe Greece or Turkey as poor living conditions only get forgotten with patriotic war and all that caz or a war between Serbs and some of the countries they border)
It’s hard to even imagine being able to regulate this stuff tbh. But hopefully the same smart minds that made will be able to regulate it
@@spdsyt I hope you are right about this
Just the same as how industrialisation caused Malthusian crises and an excuse to compete with each other for resources, or how the advent of farming caused more cohesive groups of people that could fight larger scale wars (you could probably name better examples than I have). Will AI cause another burst in international tensions, and if so, how bad will it be?
@@antarcticmapper3460 I fear that it won't be a war and more like a silent takeover of our way of thinking. Many use television to see news or get information and we know how bad it is now think about AI creating same situation for the internet. A war is possible but information war is for sure a reality
when he said we might have an all knowing ai within 6 months hit hard
AI is shit. It will be used for shit things too. We're fucked. Given two potential paths, one where AI helps people and one where it is used to create a dystopian nightmare, it's always, ALWAYS going to end up being the dystopian nightmare, because everything is so utterly shit these days and there is never any hope of it ever getting better.
Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks the use of AI will lead to disaster no matter what we do with it
I would love AI to become our competitors in survival. Because maybe, it will teach humans to work together rather than against each other.
Why fight over land when your species is being threatened with extinction?
Imagine asking Sora (when it's capable to do it) to make movies of your favourite books. How cool is that?
Sounds terrifying to me
Inventing the end of humans is the most human thing there is.
The only rule that *_MUST_* stand through any ai that improves itself is that it has NO access to it's own code, nor the ability to make another ai.
Got most of it except the tense. We aren't opening a pandoras box. It's already open.