Sure they do, they just do not know it. Putin's army using their components and diesel engines in their BMP. It is very stupid for such experienced/knowledgable company not to step in into Drones and mobile robotics markets, at list for "Law enforcement, security" segments. Double/Multi purpose solutions.
To be fair they have like 3-4 cameras pointing at him. They should be telling him which camera is live so he can look properly, or they need to cut to the camera he is looking at. Was just poor coordination all around.@@tm73827
BOSCH CEO: “The auto industry always welcome new players…..” EU: Except that their EVs are not welcome in to our markets. It’s not an option for the consumers to buy affordable EVs, it’s nothing to do we green energy movement. It’s all about politics. Consumers just have to keep paying higher price for European made EV cars. This is what we called “Open Market”.
You are right, Germany especially is a bit hypocritical in that regard. But in that argument you have to remember, that European car companies want to protect their share and work force and cheap cars from China are heavily subsidized which is not good for neither Chinese nor European car companies. You can see that with international solar companies.
@@jimidando It’s understandable for the European governments wanted to protect their own car industry. If I’m not mistaken, the Chinese government does provide subsidies to manufacturers of EVs. All EVs with a range over 400 km are eligible for subsidies of around USD2,000 and a range of 300-400 km are eligible for subsidies of around USD1,400. I’m not sure if the subsidy of $1.4K to $2k for an EV that are selling above $30k is considered heavily subsidized in EU standard. Furthermore, most EVs sold in EU is cost more than double than what the Chinese buyers paid in China. You see, when the West tries to push for green energy or carbon-free or zero emission or whatever green movement by 20xx year, EV or solar panel makers were limited and expensive. The adoption rate was so low as most people found it unaffordable. As of Paris Agreement, China has pledged it will strive to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. In order to achieve such goals, China needs to make affordable EVs and Solar Panels in order to increase adoption rate. Because of its extensive manufacturing capabilities, China may benefit from economies of scale, which lower costs per unit when production quantities are high. Mass production reduces the overall cost of manufacturing by enabling bulk material purchases, automation, simplified procedures, and effective resource usage. A same VW id4 is cost more that double to make in Germany than in China. So, the final question is, which is more important? To achieve Paris Agreement goal ASAP or to protect those companies that are unable to make affordable EVs or Solar Panels to most consumers?
This just public info and top of the subsidies "iceberg". What kind of "Free Market" we can talk about with China's communist party overall management of all industries, decades of technology steal and enforced transfers, blackmailing, owing 10trillions $ in IP licences, know-how etc. @@PVLTD
![Путин и ПЕСКОВ ждут звонка от ТРАМПА 😁 [Пародия]](/img/n.gif)
Is Bosch delivering for defense industry ?
yes
Only for things that are for "preserving life" not to any weapon systems or attack vehicles etc.
No
Sure they do, they just do not know it. Putin's army using their components and diesel engines in their BMP. It is very stupid for such experienced/knowledgable company not to step in into Drones and mobile robotics markets, at list for "Law enforcement, security" segments. Double/Multi purpose solutions.
Great CEO!
Why? You know him?
Kicking out thousands of people,
@@Timo-qb1gf Has to do it since Automation is coming to every company. Also the economic environment is not helping them either.
Why is he looking to another direction all the time?? It is so annoying!
He thinks the camera is there. Good luck with using his sensors for detecting dangerous road conditions 😂😂
To be fair they have like 3-4 cameras pointing at him. They should be telling him which camera is live so he can look properly, or they need to cut to the camera he is looking at. Was just poor coordination all around.@@tm73827
Is typical german format of sharing information with people who are and will be customer. Best consults are germans.
$FET is the future
AI can still not distinguish between a moving truck and a still standing bridge! So there is still nothing in AI, which could be called "intelligent"!
Bosch ❤
🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
BOSCH CEO: “The auto industry always welcome new players…..”
EU: Except that their EVs are not welcome in to our markets. It’s not an option for the consumers to buy affordable EVs, it’s nothing to do we green energy movement. It’s all about politics. Consumers just have to keep paying higher price for European made EV cars. This is what we called “Open Market”.
You are right, Germany especially is a bit hypocritical in that regard.
But in that argument you have to remember, that European car companies want to protect their share and work force and cheap cars from China are heavily subsidized which is not good for neither Chinese nor European car companies.
You can see that with international solar companies.
@@jimidando It’s understandable for the European governments wanted to protect their own car industry. If I’m not mistaken, the Chinese government does provide subsidies to manufacturers of EVs. All EVs with a range over 400 km are eligible for subsidies of around USD2,000 and a range of 300-400 km are eligible for subsidies of around USD1,400. I’m not sure if the subsidy of $1.4K to $2k for an EV that are selling above $30k is considered heavily subsidized in EU standard. Furthermore, most EVs sold in EU is cost more than double than what the Chinese buyers paid in China.
You see, when the West tries to push for green energy or carbon-free or zero emission or whatever green movement by 20xx year, EV or solar panel makers were limited and expensive. The adoption rate was so low as most people found it unaffordable. As of Paris Agreement, China has pledged it will strive to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. In order to achieve such goals, China needs to make affordable EVs and Solar Panels in order to increase adoption rate.
Because of its extensive manufacturing capabilities, China may benefit from economies of scale, which lower costs per unit when production quantities are high. Mass production reduces the overall cost of manufacturing by enabling bulk material purchases, automation, simplified procedures, and effective resource usage. A same VW id4 is cost more that double to make in Germany than in China.
So, the final question is, which is more important? To achieve Paris Agreement goal ASAP or to protect those companies that are unable to make affordable EVs or Solar Panels to most consumers?
This just public info and top of the subsidies "iceberg". What kind of "Free Market" we can talk about with China's communist party overall management of all industries, decades of technology steal and enforced transfers, blackmailing, owing 10trillions $ in IP licences, know-how etc. @@PVLTD