Breaking Misconceptions: The Judge and the Trust Fund Fairy Tale

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ก.พ. 2024
  • Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
    FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
    "Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
    Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
    (Bill of Rights 1688)
    Law is the people’s birth right.
    (Act of Settlement 1700)
    All are equal under the law.
    No one is above the law.
    Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
    No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
    Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self defence.
    ---------------------------------
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
    Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    campaign-resources.org/media/...

ความคิดเห็น • 177

  • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
    @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 was created to address the issue where individuals who held estates based on the lives of others could not determine if those individuals were alive or dead because they had gone beyond the seas or were absent for a long time. This Act allowed for a legal process where if a person remained absent for seven years without proof of being alive, they would be considered legally dead. In such cases, judges could direct a verdict as if the absent person was deceased, enabling the recovery of tenements by lessors or reversioners. However, if the supposedly dead person returned and proved to be alive, they could reclaim their lands and receive compensation for any losses incurred due to eviction.
    campaign-resources.org/media/Cestui%20Que%20Vie%20Act%201666/Notes%20on%20the%20Cestui%20Que%20Vie%20Act%20of%201666.pdf

  • @timegoesby12
    @timegoesby12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    You have definitely done a 180, I no longer recognise you 2 😂

    • @trappedinroom1014
      @trappedinroom1014 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They’re Agents, and his profession was business contracts! Bearing in mind a simple word or apostrophe in the court documents renders stuff void….apparently to this chap grammar and typesetting rules are irrelevant to the legal procedures! Styles manuals and different definitions in law dictionaries are ‘irrelevant’ too! That’s a really dangerous and nasty thing to sell to people because you ignore it at your peril! The courts actually have a document titled ‘temporary release from death’ which I actually got a copy of before they removed it from public access! People really are classed as dead and unknown to the system! You need to be really careful who you listen to….and stop looking for pots of gold and focus on truth. 🙂👍🏻💕

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@trappedinroom1014 You clearly have never been to court and are simply spurting your opinions :(

  • @sukhdegun8313
    @sukhdegun8313 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Did he really just say that a judge can lie but not lose their temper and that is being professional??? How can lying ever be professional????? If anybody's lost the plot, I think these guys didn't have it in the first place to lose. How can legal be lawful if you haven't given your consent to any of it??? Can I get a bunch of my buddies together and scribble some stuff down and say you now have to comply with it??? I think you'd all agree that that would be insane!! If we are all equal in the eyes of the LAW then i should be able to do the same. Legal by it's own definition is unlawful.

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes and we have a letter from judicial complaints saying they will take no action!!!

    • @MsGemini321
      @MsGemini321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The reason Judges wear a wig is to hide from God when they lie !

    • @DigbyRitson-zn4ud
      @DigbyRitson-zn4ud 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@marchorn466 What if they simply see it as outside of their remit?

    • @burntoutsuperman09
      @burntoutsuperman09 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​​@@marchorn466I don't wanna sound flippant but hear me out... That's a bit like saying you're going to put a complaint in about a Police Officer that assaulted you... They look after their own. Remember they swear and oath not to you but the Bar! I had a police constable aid and abet the theft of my car by so called 'balififs'. So....the bailifs turn up and say I owe £400 unpaid ULEZ charge from Oxford council. I remained totally calm, asked to see proper war-rant. They couldn't produce it but police still let them take my car, even though I informed him ignorance of law is no excuse and that he was aiding and abetting theft. Put a complaint in, they said come back if/when you prove that the warrant was false. I guess that I was making a claim and have to prove it was a false I get that but the complaint has been put on hold until I supply proof it was a false warrant! They should know this already! I'm going after the officers job and pension!

    • @DigbyRitson-zn4ud
      @DigbyRitson-zn4ud 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@marchorn466 perhaps what we are really aught to question is the mental fitness of the judges, if a judge makes false statements, or illogical statements, or fails to understand basic principles of law, or basic logic, then this could indicate that they are mentally unfit. Ofcourse, they only need to mentally fit enough to carry out their duties. If they simply suffer from some mental illness we shouldn't question their abilities based on this, as this could be discriminatory.

  • @MsGemini321
    @MsGemini321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Ive heard that if a judge walks out ..stay there ..its not over until the court clerk says you can leave .

    • @NoOne-hq9cp
      @NoOne-hq9cp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Clerks the book keeper also known as the shipping clerk all accounting

    • @fuzzy7515
      @fuzzy7515 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If judge walks out he has abandoned ship and also he has left the battlefield first…it your right then to stand up and claim the court and assert your authority and dismiss the case with prejudice

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @fuzzy7515 please provide the judgement you won by using this method?

  • @stuartpaul9211
    @stuartpaul9211 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    in a debt based economy the only money tree is either the real world asset or someones labour signed on a contract.

  • @Bruce4lmighty
    @Bruce4lmighty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It is the fruits of one’s labour over one’s lifetime that has been put into trust which is securitised and traded by presumed consent. This has true value however, has been conflated (probably deliberately) with the imaginary ‘pot of gold’. The government presumes itself to be both the beneficiary and the executor. The government has also presumed the true beneficiary to be the trustee. The absence of any rebuttal is key to this fraud and it is very possible to correct this presumption.
    Correcting the presumption does not create any ‘pot of gold’ however, it provides a bona fide legal defence against actions brought against one absent a victim.
    This is what the Cestiu Que Vie Act provided for and anyone that reads this Act will read in the Act that it provides remedy for the presumptions in Section IV

    • @johntimbrell
      @johntimbrell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You obviously have no experience of putting your words into practice. Copied here is my response to peacekeepers.@johntimbrell
      Words of wisdom in the first 4 minutes. (I didn't watch the rest) I paraphrase the statement in the video, " Common law supersedes statute law". It's such a pity that these two do not explain in simple terms how one can use this principle. One example I can give is that I have twice stopped police using court warrants to force entry into houses. I do not advise others following what I did unless they are confident BUT on more minor matters these two could be a useful conduit to informing the public. This is what I advise when one is prosecuted for such as the lockdown laws (unlawful imprisonment) or the hate crime laws, (freedom of speech) Firstly, do not argue with the police - they may use force. At home serve a notice on the Crown Prosecution Service by email (better than recorded delivery) containing these facts. " I am your name and address. At time date and place I am accused of offending against act and section. My action is allowed at common law and subsequent stated cases. I require you to cease and desist causing me harm. Signed and served electronically according to the rules of court. your name"
      These two could explain this in terms that others could follow. I've talked with the gentleman in the blue sweater on the phone but my impression is that his primary concern is to make money by promoting Peacekeepers. I would like to be wrong but until they explain in simple terms how Joe Public can use the common law, then I will continue to hold that opinion. (You two could respond to this by leaving a link so that I can contact you) 8,000 people who were charged after being arrested for breaking the lockdown laws had their cases dropped by the CPS.

    • @Bruce4lmighty
      @Bruce4lmighty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johntimbrell You obviously rebutted the necessary presumptions

    • @johntimbrell
      @johntimbrell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Bruce4lmighty I didn't need to. I served legal notices on the Chief Constable by email which is better than recorded delivery. I pointed out the difference between legal and lawful and used the Criminal Law Act 1977 sect 6 which reinforces common law. It's a pity Peacekeepers do not explain how to use the law.

  • @timegoesby12
    @timegoesby12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I don't know if there is gold 🪙 or FIAT currency 💲 or anything at all in the trust, but the I listen to this subject people from Italy, England, Canada, Australia, America, Peace Keepers are the only one who tell a different story which is confusing to say the least.
    They have explained the figure person by using the legislation,I mean do I need to say more?
    The real question is:
    Did they switch or they always been gate keepers?

    • @timegoesby12
      @timegoesby12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 which books 📚

    • @timegoesby12
      @timegoesby12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 thanks for the tip 🙏

  • @JohnSmith-vy4lh
    @JohnSmith-vy4lh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    When an estate is not claimed for 12 years , it is deemed bona vacantia.
    And where does it go, It doesn't go to the treasury like you would expect, but to the crown or the Dutchy of Cornwall.
    At present there is around 9000 unclaimed estates in the system, but don't quote me on that.
    As for trusts, the crown have made various trusts in the past on behalf of the people before the glorious revolution.
    A trust is fundamentally a contract, and the same can be said of an oath.
    Oaths, trusts and contracts all overlap and intersect. It all boils down to honor.
    You can be grantor and trustee, but a grantor can not be the beneficiary..
    A trustee can use the trust in accordance with the trust requirements.
    Trustees can be paid.

  • @jazzstream
    @jazzstream 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    whatever happened to equity taking precedent ?
    Romley Stewart was right all along.

  • @jonathancharles1074
    @jonathancharles1074 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I beg to differ, it's been proven in the US, how are people able to do 1099 OID on Court Charges? if it's all rubbish as you say, you should also be talking about the Bankruptcy.
    The Defendant is made the Trustee for breaking company rules (Law) and liable, Judge and or Claimant moves into beneficiary unless rebutted.

    • @NoOne-hq9cp
      @NoOne-hq9cp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Constructive trust

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So why does the looser pay the winner??? Looser does not pay court!!!

    • @robfloders8730
      @robfloders8730 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is a looser?

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robfloders8730 If there is no case to answer then the claimant... if the judge decides the defendant then the defendant pays the claimant... The court only take their fees to deal with the dispute!!!

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Try your 1099 in UK and see how far you get :) Many have and know it does not work!

  • @Happydays1111
    @Happydays1111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The only thing is worrying me about you guys because we had it at our local community meet ups. These couple of guys were so fixated on council tax when there's many other problems but later to get found out they was Mason causing trouble in the group and causing divide.

  • @wethinkweknowitall
    @wethinkweknowitall 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm totally confused now.

    • @timegoesby12
      @timegoesby12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's their goal, they switched

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What are you talking about!

    • @wethinkweknowitall
      @wethinkweknowitall 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel Aren't we the executor and beneficiary???

    • @wethinkweknowitall
      @wethinkweknowitall 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you. How do we go that?@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629

  • @SL-cq4xq
    @SL-cq4xq 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Some Americans proved the existence of the funds in the Cestui Que Trust…

  • @keithshippey230
    @keithshippey230 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The average person in uk has spending power of 200 million year

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "We value evidence and need your input to validate your claim. Can you answer a few questions to help us understand better?"
      1. What led you to this belief?
      2. Where can you point me to be able to validate this information?
      We look forward to your answers.

    • @keithshippey230
      @keithshippey230 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel it isn’t a belief we have GDP And banks have interest aka inflation

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@keithshippey230but you said I have spending power of 200 million - how do you use yours and why dont you tell others how to use theirs???

    • @keithshippey230
      @keithshippey230 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel if you’re
      GDP is say 2% it’s actually 2 trillion pounds then you have the bank’s interest say 5% then both them numbers multiplied so it will be 10 trillion country spent that year

    • @keithshippey230
      @keithshippey230 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel the biggest transfer of wealth happened when we joined the eu the whole system changed

  • @MsGemini321
    @MsGemini321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So if the council tax was the "pen"..the ct sits in the triangle until the judge Trustee decides if it should either get thrown out or awarded to the claimant?

  • @sovereign_paul
    @sovereign_paul 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    More heresy. Where is your evidence?
    Why is the Cestui Qué Vie Act 1666 still on the statute books?
    What Government functions use it? What do they use it for? If the answer to these questions draws a complete blank then get it repealed.

  • @user-il7lp6on5n
    @user-il7lp6on5n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Changing nappies? What baby expects their nappy to be changed by a trustee? Total gatekeepers.

  • @Happydays1111
    @Happydays1111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Here's the corrected version:
    "Are you completely in agreement with you guys about this? I've cornered so many people regarding this. I met this gentleman called Julian Coulter who was educating me about this, and at the time, I thought it was a load of codswallop. Then, I was going through his to-do list and process with this, and my life suddenly got turned upside down. If this wasn't true, why would the Masons waste so much time, energy, and money with people exposed in it? I had my car taken, was set up on a job, kids were getting coerced, and much more.
    I can send you one of the notices that you sent to your council and you will see what I going on about

  • @niceandbrightcleaningservi3866
    @niceandbrightcleaningservi3866 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can i ask you about c.tax summons please

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Watch other videos where that is covered.

  • @majestic1263
    @majestic1263 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    hmmm don't really agree unfortunately, i actually have evidence of this being true and the "lot" with gold buried being deposited into Trust so, like you say, we all have our own beliefs. very good explanation though, and parts i do see what you mean, my only conflict is i have evidence to show something along these line is happening.

    • @tcrookes2803
      @tcrookes2803 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I've got Marc's personal email address if you want to send the evidence to him?

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you had evidence you would be able to show every one the millions in your bank account... but you cant, nor can anyone else that preachers the CQV stuff...

    • @majestic1263
      @majestic1263 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tcrookes2803 please.

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      peacekeepers@post.com

  • @assetvigilante-um8bc
    @assetvigilante-um8bc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great dtuff lads but my word I'm not sure of your explanation at all on this Trust explanation but it lacks clarity with facts and will consider your position from other information I have at total odds to your claims 😮 ee will see ?

  • @jollymelloncolly
    @jollymelloncolly 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I enjoy both your and Spaniards work, and would love to see a video were you talk about your difference's.. Spaniard believes in the Cestui que vie act, and the person.. So why not come together and discuss it..Perhaps it could bring some clarity for the community. Thanks.

  • @genuinearticle33
    @genuinearticle33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well if if it is an adjournment that is made when the Administrators/Judge walks out, why is it that in the case when jurisdiction is challenged, they simply issue an arrest warrant for non appearance or issue a Liability order anyway? Surely if it is an adjournment as you say then another notice of hearing would be issued? but that is not the case...

    • @genuinearticle33
      @genuinearticle33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well that the whole point isn't it, you cannot show up as the person and then contest jurisdiction, by contesting the presumed capacity that they are deeming to be correct, you challenge jurisdiction, i know who i am thanks ...

  • @jeffbarrett1787
    @jeffbarrett1787 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Marc / Brian, I think I understood what you were saying ie: claimant, trustee and beneficiary, but I’m left confused as to what the significance of presentation was about.

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Judge is not trustee to settle the claim out of a CQV trust!!!

    • @jeffbarrett1787
      @jeffbarrett1787 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marchorn466 thank you Marc for quick response. I’ve watched again and Brian seems to understand fully, I’ll have to see if my grasp of it improves I’ll rerun video a few times. My apologies if I’m not understanding fully.

    • @Kirky9lad
      @Kirky9lad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      What's the THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF
      COURT all about ?

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Kirky9lad another fairy tale....

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The twelve presumptions of law are not explicitly recognized as a specific set of legal principles in the UK courts system. However, the UK legal system does recognize various presumptions of law, which are rules of substantive law rather than rules of evidence.
      These presumptions may be either rebuttable or irrebuttable. For example, the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty is guaranteed in Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and it applies in the UK's legal system. This right ensures that the burden of proving guilt remains with the prosecution.
      Specific examples of presumptions recognised in the UK legal system include the presumption of death, the presumption of sanity, and the presumption of innocence.

  • @jonathancharles1074
    @jonathancharles1074 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Funny how you delete my responses.

  • @NoOne-hq9cp
    @NoOne-hq9cp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Explain the bid bond,payment bond,surety bond,performance bond for a case

  • @user-nx6mv5vk9q
    @user-nx6mv5vk9q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No i think your wrong Mark, the trust is to pay your bills as their is no value (Gold backed) which they removed in the 30's and you became creditor for the system?

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "We value evidence and need your input to validate your claim. Can you answer a few questions to help us understand better?"
      1. What led you to this belief?
      2. Where can you point me to be able to validate this information?
      We look forward to your answers.

    • @marchorn466
      @marchorn466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Nothing has value beyond what anyone is prepared to give in exchange! Money is merely a commodity just like anything else!!!

    • @TH-cl5be
      @TH-cl5be 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thats why they send you that cheque on the bottom of the energy bill to domestic property its different bill for commercial the peoples bills are paid for that was the deal to move us off gold backed and on to fiction debt backed we have nothing to pay with so its free now they can print money hand over fist devaluing the pound etc like we just seen yet again now y pound wont buy you bot all now its war time again more will get printed and things will get worse the hole system has been hijacked by criminals

    • @user-nx6mv5vk9q
      @user-nx6mv5vk9q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why does it state on paper fiat currency that " i promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of xx pounds" how do we pay a debt by a promise to pay backed by belief, not of value (money, gold or silver).
      @@marchorn466

    • @user-nx6mv5vk9q
      @user-nx6mv5vk9q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The same misdirections as 'covid 19' and the safe and effective vaccines, or the spraying of our skies to stop global warming getting that dangerous gas of life Co2 to zero, obviously the same folk that forgot to tell us about the BIRTH CERTIFICATE SCAM AND EVERYTHING ELSE THEY HAVE LIED ABOUT, use your belief my friend, and validate that! @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel

  • @fuzzy7515
    @fuzzy7515 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There is a trust via your berth certificate… this guy is an agent hands down, first 2 minutes…as there is no “money” you just offset and discharge it using your exemption account as the world is bankrupt

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great, now you won't mind providing the evidence that you have successfully done this? I'm mean you have done this right?
      We will be waiting...

    • @fuzzy7515
      @fuzzy7515 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel you need to go in with your berth certificate as executor of the estate and appoint the judge as the administrator of the trust…I don’t cross the bar as you would give them jurisdiction by stepping on their ship. It’s all a learning curve….also if you answer to the “Name” it also gives them jurisdiction…fyi these are administrative courts of equity….it’s all about who gonna cough up

    • @fuzzy7515
      @fuzzy7515 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel your guest didn’t actually provide any “evidence” either just talking gibberish as he has no true “understanding” (legalese) of how the court works considering the bankruptcy of the whole world and they just there administering the bankruptcy to have someone cough up for the debt of the country/corporation

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So you can't provide any evidence just an opinion?

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How many times have you been in a court and used the information you claim works?

  • @user-il7lp6on5n
    @user-il7lp6on5n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do Brians tattoos look like henna?

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why don't you ask Tony the man that did them, I'm sure he would love to answer you!
      facebook.com/tony.tatts.37

    • @user-il7lp6on5n
      @user-il7lp6on5n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel a little bit quick on the reply. A little bit defensive too.

  • @MotionArtist3D
    @MotionArtist3D 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    With all due respect guys but I highly recommend listening to interviews of Bibi Bacchus. There are few videos on the internet.
    The highest form of governing Law at present on this planet is the Universal Commercial Code.
    Everything else is a theatre.

    • @MrHughk1
      @MrHughk1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      UCC only applies within the UNITED STATES, there are no other signatories that I am aware of

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No thanks. Unfortunately this type of information is exactly what we do not waste our time on.

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Brilliant, send us your evidence for evaluation.

    • @MotionArtist3D
      @MotionArtist3D 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Untrue, it is worldwide. Did you know for example that IRS is British?

    • @MotionArtist3D
      @MotionArtist3D 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel Likewise, I will do the same and stop watching and listening to your channel. All the best !

  • @timegoesby12
    @timegoesby12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Brian the Spaniard knows you, no wonder he hasn't made a video expose about you.

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What are you talking about!

    • @robfloders8730
      @robfloders8730 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Enlighten us you made a Claim so wheres the proof?

    • @timegoesby12
      @timegoesby12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robfloders8730 The proof that Simon knows Brian?

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What are you going on about.

    • @timegoesby12
      @timegoesby12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel I was only saying that Simon wont be making a video about you 2 unlike, he won't be using the same scrutinity he has for Peter Wilson, Ian From Matrix Freedoom, Pete Stone ect.
      That's it, just my opinion.

  • @tanzer444
    @tanzer444 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you do on a video on rebutting the 12 presumptions of court?

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is no clear evidence to indicate that these presumptions are universally recognized or applied in specific courts.
      If anyone has evidence they are applicable then we will evaluate the information and do a video.
      Until then we do not waste our time and energy on unsupported conjectures.

  • @markp6982
    @markp6982 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If there is no 'pot of gold' what is behind bonds/gilts that the BoE buys? There has to be something there or the value of the 4 Nations sea, land and property is zero.

  • @linc3185
    @linc3185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The content is lost because of the way its put across. You are forever saing one thing and then correcting yourself and stalling your next sentence. Umms and arrs and errs make it so hard to listen to

  • @Alex-ss7oj
    @Alex-ss7oj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a speeding ticket, I don’t agree with it obviously and it’s not a black and white situation. How would I challenge this or look for a remedy, then could I use this with common law??

  • @eugene28781
    @eugene28781 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lost my trust to these 2 guys. They say there is no proof of trust system in the court without providing any facts to back it up. Giving a nonsense and theirs own opinions. Judge adjourning cause he is looses his cool. Any evidence to back it up or it is just a hear and say.

    • @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
      @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why don't you provide the evidence that it does exist?

    • @eugene28781
      @eugene28781 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel Why claim the opposite without evidence? Where is the evidence judge went for coffee? Where this claim about changing jurisdiction comes from? Is this based on facts? Why talk about something not having a clue?

  • @darryllever9827
    @darryllever9827 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please stop the AI CRAP in your new videos. ..or has your channel been cloned? ???

  • @tinman.12
    @tinman.12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Funny that. I got cheques with my NI Number as an account number and HM Treasury sort code and they're being accepted on numerous fronts so far.

    • @edismendoza3881
      @edismendoza3881 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      POE cheques?

    • @G58
      @G58 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mattmill30 Some of the most important unanswered questions surround the criteria being deployed by TH-cam to censor comments as you’re describing here.
      But if we were to take these guys advice we wouldn’t even consider it an issue. I suggest that maybe this is why they are being described as gatekeepers.
      Peace

    • @G58
      @G58 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you mean that you received cheques as the PAYEE? Or were you able to write those cheques and draw funds yourself?