HISTORY OF IDEAS - Capitalism

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Though capitalism seems like just plain common-sense nowadays, it is a theory of human society with a distinctive history and set of assumptions.
    Enjoying our TH-cam videos? Get full access to all our audio content, videos, and thousands of thought-provoking articles, conversation cards and more with The School of Life Subscription: t.ly/erTao
    Be more mindful, present and inspired. Get the best of The School of Life delivered straight to your inbox: t.ly/PhCqe
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    Feel free to follow us at the links below:
    Facebook: / theschooloflifelondon
    X: / theschooloflife
    Instagram: / theschooloflifelondon
    CREDITS
    Brought to you by www.theschooloflife.com
    Produced in collaboration with Mike Booth
    / somegreybloke
    Research by Alexander Hitchcock #TheSchoolOfLife

ความคิดเห็น • 9K

  • @jadekavanah9312
    @jadekavanah9312 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2594

    I, too, enjoy uplifting programs about tractor production

    • @matthewgillespie2835
      @matthewgillespie2835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      How dare one not to enjoy such masterpieces!
      Off with their heads!

    • @demigodgamez
      @demigodgamez 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@matthewgillespie2835
      I can hear the voice of that red queen from Alice in Wonderland.

    • @canyounot2102
      @canyounot2102 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Who doesn’t?

    • @mrbeersinface
      @mrbeersinface 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      I am sure that North Korea still plays those programs on television if your interested in watching them

    • @hakimlf251
      @hakimlf251 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mrbeersinface bad sarcasm please try again

  • @JustDom
    @JustDom 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3118

    This guy talks so soothing like his wife is on the bed next to him, trying to sleep.

    • @thedebatemechannel4746
      @thedebatemechannel4746 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Or...child

    • @chacha-dh1gj
      @chacha-dh1gj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +169

      I just imagine him telling her wife the history of capitalism as a bedtime story

    • @somerandomguy5995
      @somerandomguy5995 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Maybe that’s his secret

    • @eternalkino34
      @eternalkino34 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@thomasdupont7186 thy name is aimiliar

    • @hywelrees3667
      @hywelrees3667 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@thomasdupont7186 you came back to edit this, and it's still shit.
      You had a chance, and you fucked it.

  • @m.bowyer5045
    @m.bowyer5045 3 ปีที่แล้ว +718

    Money won't buy you happiness.....but it will make life comfortable

    • @cedrickjmackniddle3861
      @cedrickjmackniddle3861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      If you dont think money can buy happiness, you don't know where to shop. - Dan Peña

    • @ece5925
      @ece5925 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And degenerate

    • @ece5925
      @ece5925 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Cedrick J'mack Niddle no, then you are just not a degenerate materialist

    • @chrish344
      @chrish344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      @@ece5925 I don't really think money can buy happiness, but it can give you a sense of security and opportunity, which can facilitate happiness as long as it doesn't make you greedy and corrupt you (basically if your life doesn't revolve around it). Having a lot of money doesn't necessarily make you a degenerate materialist, it's how you spend or invest or donate that money. Bill Gates donates nearly half of his income to charity. I do believe that giving to other people, whether it be your time, money, or whatever else, plays a huge role in a person's happiness and self-worth.

    • @TheHandleOnYoutube
      @TheHandleOnYoutube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Because they can buy things all people should be able to afford within reason. I mean, should anyone in this day and age have enough money to buy a planet?

  • @wpprodpyc9266
    @wpprodpyc9266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +252

    "Why am I speaking English" - Vladimir Putin

    • @seanmoran6510
      @seanmoran6510 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Chris Sain Prices go down as well as up 🤷‍♂️

    • @joemamaobama6863
      @joemamaobama6863 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Tenebris Lupus ye he was a kgb agent tf do we expect

  • @SCP3017-1
    @SCP3017-1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2461

    "Every book is a remix of the dictionary."
    -Leonardo da Vinci

    • @GrahamChapman
      @GrahamChapman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +293

      "Don't believe everything you read on the internet."
      - Abraham Lincoln

    • @SCP3017-1
      @SCP3017-1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +171

      "It's not gae if it's Ricardo"
      -Albert Einstein

    • @GrahamChapman
      @GrahamChapman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +103

      "Being gay is kosher as long as you don't fuck a guy in the vagina."
      - Jesus of Nazareth

    • @dianathompson7597
      @dianathompson7597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's just made up words

    • @SCP3017-1
      @SCP3017-1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      "Sex is the only manifestation that's human."
      -Diogenes

  • @vasaricorridor7989
    @vasaricorridor7989 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2254

    The mark of true intelligence
    is not to understand a difficult thing,
    but to make a difficult thing
    understandable.?

    • @Oleander410
      @Oleander410 5 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      I would say you definitely understand something better if you can make it intelligible to those less intelligent than oneself, but I don't think I don't grasp algebra because I can't teach it to my dog. Some things are just complex and simply beyond some people. It doesn't make someone less intelligent if they are able to grasp something extremely difficult but still unable to communicate that thing to someone else.

    • @a.ismail3317
      @a.ismail3317 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      I would say, the first sentence is the first step, and the second sentence is the second step to mark the true intelligence.

    • @joecarmo9059
      @joecarmo9059 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      The issue in this cute remark is the meaning of the word "understanding" A lot of people use that word but not a lot of people know what it really means. When I "understand" something how do you know I really did? What is this test to evaluate "understanding?" The meaning of "understanding" is ineffable and can only evaluated indirectly through behaviorist experiments. For instance one can erroneously say a child understands quadratic equations if they are able to apply the proper formula to find the value of X. However does this child really "understand" quadratic equations? Can they, for instance, describe the relationship between those equations and conic curves, or Kepler's laws or planetary motion?

    • @Manuel-gu9ls
      @Manuel-gu9ls 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly my philosophy useful in developing countries

    • @joecarmo9059
      @joecarmo9059 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jay Bee non sequitur.

  • @marcusdevalera5328
    @marcusdevalera5328 3 ปีที่แล้ว +843

    Capitalism video: has 2.5 million views
    Communism video: has 6.7 million views

    • @shamusson
      @shamusson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +159

      Cus commies are more ideological

    • @ghastlyghandi4301
      @ghastlyghandi4301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      @@shamusson and your not clearly lol

    • @shamusson
      @shamusson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@ghastlyghandi4301 sure am

    • @snowpea7994
      @snowpea7994 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      That’s a tragedy

    • @gushangshang5442
      @gushangshang5442 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Hey I can't seem to find the communism one - would you mind sharing the link? Much appreciated!

  • @skepticexmuslim727
    @skepticexmuslim727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +322

    Subjects of Economics and Philosophy should be compulsory right from the early age classes... It is very important to educate the young about what is happening around us and why!

    • @CIMAmotor
      @CIMAmotor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      the problem is that, in the UK, the teachers wouldn't look any further than Das Kapital, Maynard Keynes, Marx, Gramsci, and Foucault.

    • @philoslother4602
      @philoslother4602 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@CIMAmotor same problem everywhere

    • @Kaiser2137
      @Kaiser2137 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right?

    • @TeaParty1776
      @TeaParty1776 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Philosophy is too abstract before university because students dont have the experience to connect to philosophy and their minds are not fully developed. Students need less abstract applications of philosophy, ie, science, history, math, literature.
      Marva Collins Way-Marva Collins
      Teaching Johnny To Think-..... ........Leonard Peikoff

    • @vishalpundir2340
      @vishalpundir2340 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I think system just want worker to do their job meet metric by the end of month. They want good employees.
      They don't want intellectual to understand whole process (the big picture).

  • @sarahmaviolin
    @sarahmaviolin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1828

    "Capitalism is when iPhone" -Adam Smith

    • @josephjoestar275
      @josephjoestar275 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Wut

    • @bsurajraju
      @bsurajraju 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      hahaha ....next IPhone charger sold separately lol haha

    • @tibfulv
      @tibfulv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@bsurajraju
      Which is why we have the saying _caveat emptor_ - let the buyer beware. Buying Apple today is a fools errand. They're way too much into their walled garden philosophy.

    • @charlietube7165
      @charlietube7165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      LoL

    • @yourealittlebitfat4344
      @yourealittlebitfat4344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      communism is when your power shuts down at 9 pm and you go cry to your mommy cause you had no idea that was also a part of communism. indoctrinated clown

  • @oberstul1941
    @oberstul1941 8 ปีที่แล้ว +324

    How can I say this most plainly? These videos are so good and so to the point... that it hurts. It's like it can be felt.

    • @Nonsequitor415
      @Nonsequitor415 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +oberstul except that the dutch east indian company was not mentioned... but whatever.

    • @clappedoutpinto7812
      @clappedoutpinto7812 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +The School of Life PLEASE STOP THE PAIN!!!!! I BEG OF YOUUUU!!!!

    • @mikethemonsta15
      @mikethemonsta15 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Not really. They didn't even bring up Ayn Rand. But that would hurt their socialist agenda.

    • @mikethemonsta15
      @mikethemonsta15 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The misconception these socialist philosophers have is they think goods being successful being on the free market represent their philosophically objective value. They do not. The works of Adam Smith will always be of more philosophically objective value than of Dance Moms.
      However, the success of goods on the free market represent their Socially Objective Value. This means their value to the user in the context of their life. Another example, an airplane is of greater philosophically technical achievement than a bicycle. But if your transportation needs do not exceed the needs of a bicycle than why would you buy an airplane even if you had the money?
      Another example. Lipstick is of less philosophically objective value than a microscope. But lipsticks socially objective value is greater to the Starbucks barista whose difference of having lipstick or not might be the difference between confidence or shame.

    • @mikethemonsta15
      @mikethemonsta15 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      However, this does not mean that the socially objective value of a product is completely subjective. If a barista has enough money for lipstick but did not budget enough money for a doctor to use a microscope for a medical exam, she learns a better way of budgeting. The free market serves as a teacher.
      I propose that Capitalism is not only the most rational social system, but the most moral social system as well. It is only system that protects individual rights.

  • @williamxb
    @williamxb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +363

    "Quote that makes the opposing side look stupid"
    -Commentor's preferred Politician/Philosopher

    • @Reblwitoutacause
      @Reblwitoutacause 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I always thought that particular Politician/Philosopher to be overly pedantic, pestiferous, and verbose in a supercilious way, personally.

    • @pyromorph6540
      @pyromorph6540 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      That's so true, the opposing side is so stupid and mean for supporting this ideology, as they believe it will enhance and prosper the lives of his family and community 😂😂😂
      So instead of having compassionate conversation with them, i will make both of us suffer in a cycle of fighting 🧠

    • @anindividual9225
      @anindividual9225 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I needed to read this lol

    • @alimuratakkan
      @alimuratakkan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      a short answer to: What is confirmation bias? :)

    • @major7thsmcgee973
      @major7thsmcgee973 ปีที่แล้ว

      *Insert George Orwell quote here*
      -Argument won

  • @digitalairaire
    @digitalairaire 3 ปีที่แล้ว +305

    7:30 I didn't wake up this morning expecting to see naked communist beach volleyball, yet here we are

    • @MrEvldreamr
      @MrEvldreamr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      lmao!! ikr

    • @davidinnes4318
      @davidinnes4318 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yup.

    • @dr.killakill960
      @dr.killakill960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ew I thought the guy in the front was wearing pants

    • @dremora99
      @dremora99 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bruh

    • @duviepugh9568
      @duviepugh9568 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Brah! That was the funniest part. I had to pause it. I was like “what hell”. Lol. They promise good time (in my Russian voice).

  • @randy109
    @randy109 8 ปีที่แล้ว +753

    Money is NOT the 'root of all evil'; The LOVE of Money is the 'root of all evil'. I got my degree in economics almost 40 years ago and have studied Economics my entire Life. No matter what Marx proclaimed, Money IS essential for an Economy to go beyond a Hunter/Gatherer society. Money simply makes "Barter" easier by putting a price on everything instead of trying to deal in mere trading of goods. Money can be "good" or "evil" depending on its use...

    • @MojoBonzo
      @MojoBonzo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      +randy109 you are right... one can argue that every concept is as evil as the people taking advantage of it... one question, since im no expert and i would like an opinion in that matter, why dont we use a credit system instead of monetary?!

    • @theoverdox
      @theoverdox 8 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      +randy109 our use of a profit based, "growth" driven monetary system has become
      one of the greatest destroyers of the natural world and sustainable
      human values. The entire global economy requires "cyclical consumption"
      to operate, which means that money must constantly be circulating. Thus,
      new goods and services must be constantly introduced regardless of the
      state of the environment and actual human necessity. This "perpetual"
      approach has a fatal flaw for resources as we know it are simply not
      infinite. Resources are finite and the Earth is essentially a closed
      system. To assume the need for constant consumption to keep people
      employed and hence the market system going is eco-cidal on a finite
      planet. The true goal of an economy, by definition, is to strategically
      preserve and create efficiency. The system today demands the opposite.

    • @quentinmackenzie4650
      @quentinmackenzie4650 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      +randy109 No, ignorance is the root of all evil.

    • @MrBlancify
      @MrBlancify 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      +randy109 There has existed societies that have fared well without money.

    • @rockthepunchx9547
      @rockthepunchx9547 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Erik Le Blanc Pleym now it is prey to societies with money. it's on a dinner plate.

  • @ghastlyghandi4301
    @ghastlyghandi4301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +175

    “CAPITALISM”
    -Adam smith, wealth of nations

    • @prometheus5405
      @prometheus5405 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Karl Marx coined "Capitalism". Adam Smith preferred “commercial society.”

    • @ghastlyghandi4301
      @ghastlyghandi4301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Kaushik Kurudi no I’m not Gandhi. That’s not someone else.

    • @mohammadmaniat1040
      @mohammadmaniat1040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you summarize the whole book of adam smith.

  • @Andy_Dagamer
    @Andy_Dagamer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +508

    It's true that Jesus attacked money changers in the temple. But Jesus never attacked money changers in market places.
    Jesus didn't attack them because they were doing business but rather because they were conducting that business in a temple

    • @senorstrangelov
      @senorstrangelov 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      exactly. Also usury is not a moral way to engage in capitalism.

    • @TeaParty1776
      @TeaParty1776 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      In that culture, temples were a place where money was safe. But the Christian hatred of life included money.

    • @TeaParty1776
      @TeaParty1776 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@senorstrangelov There is no such fact as usury. There is only voluntary and mutually selfish agreement between lender and borrower because, in their independent judgments, the loan benefits their life. Morality is a guide to life, not to the sacrifice of life. Sacrifice is morally depraved, death-worship.

    • @senorstrangelov
      @senorstrangelov 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@TeaParty1776 negative. Temples were and are a place of worship. This is a round about way of hating on Christianity. Anyone with a brain can see that.

    • @TeaParty1776
      @TeaParty1776 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@senorstrangelov Your mystical ideal is not about the historical reality of temples as safe places for money.
      Christianity, like all religion, is immoral. It is death-worship and life-hatred. It is hatred of mans mind focused onto concrete reality. It is retreat into a fantasy in which self-responsibility is not needed because "God" will take care of you. This is not roundabout. Christianity is evil. Morality is a guide to life and happiness here in the material universe.

  • @PolitcsUnleased
    @PolitcsUnleased 3 ปีที่แล้ว +300

    "if u complain about being poor, just find a way to become not poor" carl marks (Karl Marx's American cousin)

    • @cmathews5909
      @cmathews5909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yeeter, right-on but Marx's issue with capitalism was with time, it would save, enrich and eventually impoverish workers. The firsts two industrial revolutions are good examples, as well as the 80's for the West who's working class used debt (money lenders) to maintain their quality of life. Brexit and then Trump is 2016 version. When democracy falls in the West, will Karl have the last laugh?

    • @cmathews5909
      @cmathews5909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @M33ble Brexit for the people by the people? The promises that won those votes came to as much fruition as repealing Obama Care, building the Wall, getting tough on China etc.... which all led to catastrophic economic losses. Outside the EU, who exactly was Britain going to trade its surplus output with, and if they were allowed to trade within the EU, at what additional costs? As a small business exporter (multinationals just borrow money made out of thin air (The Fed)), would those additional costs make you noncompetitive in nearly all foreign markets? The icing on the cake is these state crippling issues have yet to be resolved on either side of the pond. Are we getting the picture that low info voters can be dangerous to Democracy? Better yet, there is a 2500 year book that can explain it much better: "The Republic" by Plato.

    • @lulla8312
      @lulla8312 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Exactly bro. Just don't be poor, it's that easy.
      As the most intelluctually talented philosopher of the western world, Ben 'The Destroyer' Shapiro debunks a common concern raised by climate activists. "Where will I live when the sea levels rise and my house gets flooded?" Ben 'The Destroyer' Shapiro solves, in his answer, the easy solution not only to this particular problem but also every single complaign about capitalism and poverty in general.
      Ben 'Mega-Brain' Shapiro states "You don't think the people will simply sell their houses if the sea level rise?" And I think that this can be generalised further:
      Why don't poor people don't just sell stuff, open up a business or get good education so they can have a good job? It's honestly that easy!
      I think it is because they actually 'like' to be poor. They don't do shit about it, because, if they would become wealthy, it would prove that capitalism is in fact the single best ideology on our planet. They, however, want to keep their revolutionary beliefs and leftist ideals, and will also for that reason, in fact, stay poor and throw their lifes away.
      Checkmate.

    • @breezzyboy7603
      @breezzyboy7603 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@lulla8312 lol thats the only argument any libtard neckbeard communists have against Ben shapiro.

    • @charefeddine2199
      @charefeddine2199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      ​@@lulla8312 so people with wealth doesn't deserve their wealth?? they were just too lucky risking their money and working on their businesses for soo long. it is not easy to get wealthy but capitalism makes it that if u work hard enough u will make it

  • @brettwyatt7165
    @brettwyatt7165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1044

    I've always wanted to form a band and call it Jesus and the money lender's

    • @1337fraggzb00N
      @1337fraggzb00N 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Just do it. I am looking forward to listen to the first songs 😀

    • @brettwyatt7165
      @brettwyatt7165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      @@souranis bad credit. Can't get a lone from the money lenders

    • @ceterisparibus8966
      @ceterisparibus8966 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@brettwyatt7165 loan*

    • @RadenWA
      @RadenWA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I’d expect the songs to be calling out commercialization of religion

    • @carjaune6793
      @carjaune6793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      *lenders

  • @pRopaaNS
    @pRopaaNS 8 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    How is capitalism immoral if it focuses on producing what people want? It's a fair and honest market.

    • @pRopaaNS
      @pRopaaNS 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Bigdawgphilleep It's up to a person what kind of path he decides to take in his life. Taking one aimed towards becoming a businessman yourself is not easier than the road of becoming asomeone's employee. But in the end capitalism creates work for everyone and is aimed to please society's demands. What better system would you propose? I'd say that the real issue is that people just have tendency of getting pampered, life is just not as easy as a fairy tale.

    • @pRopaaNS
      @pRopaaNS 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bigdawgphilleep Excuse me for my ignorance, but about what political favors are you talking about?
      Using life as commodity, disposing when not needed anymore - what are you talking about, assasinating employees after they can't do the work anymore? I think you're just exaggerating what happens when someone gets to point of getting fired from his job. In which way do you see it as "disposal"? More like something what happens when business is doing terribly to point that there is no other choice but to start cutting expenses as much as possible.
      Could you enlighten me also about how does capitalism kills those refusing to participate in it?

    • @andyyin7455
      @andyyin7455 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      +pRopaaNS
      1) It's up to a person what kind of path he decides to take in his life: But a person's path is also decided by the wealth of that person's parents, the country in which they were born, the gender and race they are, and a whole host of other variables. Capitalism does not by any means makes things 'fair.'
      2) Capitalism creates work for everyone: That's not a good thing. Work for the vast majority of those who live in the capitalist world is dull, repetitive, and uncreative. A better system would give wealth straight to the people without such soul-crushing demands - we certainly have enough resources and automation to do so, especially since we could eliminate useless work that creates no real value, yet is maintained because of the capitalist-created, arbitrary connection between labour and the right to eat and sleep under a roof.
      3) Capitalism is aimed to please society's demands: Only to the extent that pleasing these demands is profitable for the capitalist. Its primary purpose is to make profit for the capitalist.
      4) Life is just not as easy as a fairy tale: You're not wrong. But it's not a valid ethical judgement because it says IS, not SHOULD. We have enough resources and our production is automated sufficiently to provide the entire world with a much higher standard of living than most experience right now, so why should we shackle ourselves to what IS? Certainly capitalists did not have qualms about overturning feudalism because "that's just the way it IS." If humanity needs hardship, why shouldn't we return to a hunter-gatherer way of life? And why don't we engineer hardship in a way such that people have to give their consent to experience it, rather than have poverty and wage slavery forced upon them?

    • @xXxTr0nxXx
      @xXxTr0nxXx 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +pRopaaNS It's like democracy, most people want it, but most are too stupid for the system.

    • @pRopaaNS
      @pRopaaNS 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ***** 1) I disagree. Indeed people around influences a person and perhabs in many cases strives him to take certain paths in his life, but in the end that person decides himself, even if he doesn't realize that. Taking a path carved for you by others is still your path and your choice, because too much pressure can make a person to decide otherwise and refuse that path people keep pushing him for.
      2) The dull boring work is also the easiest one to do. To get more exciting and interesting work better education is neccesary. Many people might not be all there for carving their future when going to school and university but be forced there by people around them, but in the end it's their choice whenever to take studies seriously or not and become a routhine worker in some factory.
      3) Capitalist don't get all of the profit in his own pocket. All of the profit made by company must be invested to further expand and improve the comapny, stuffing the money in your own pocket is illegal addording to law. He can only give himself money what he formalizes as his own salary.
      4) I don't disagree, but I don't like when people complains an stays negative in face of having great opportunities and resources. Negativity is useful to extent of keeping expectations in the right place, so you can apprechiate when things go better than expected. Expanding negativity towards your outwards view on the world while keeping expectactions overly positive is not going to end well for you. Never beign satisfied, nothing is as good as you'd like it to be.. Why do you have to torture yourself? I don't. I think that the life is fine, because the reality is better than my expectatctions inside. That's why I say that life is not fairy tale, to remind myself that I'm not taking an acid trip and to place my feet on reality as it is.

  • @dumbthings7800
    @dumbthings7800 3 ปีที่แล้ว +182

    Who tf is this wide eyed guy he keeps showing he’s scaring the shit out of me.

    • @stevenf5902
      @stevenf5902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hahahaha X”D

    • @itsakenthang
      @itsakenthang 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hahahahahahaha

    • @yoyoman_blue6485
      @yoyoman_blue6485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What are you on about?

    • @sleros8646
      @sleros8646 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@yoyoman_blue6485 the guy in 5:35

    • @matiasrodriguez615
      @matiasrodriguez615 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think Samuel Pickwick, a character from one of Charles Dickens' books.

  • @donovanreimer2324
    @donovanreimer2324 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Incredible production and such easy narration to enjoy listening to. Thank you for all your time on this.

    • @danielgeci4513
      @danielgeci4513 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This was a terrible video, you must not know much about history. This video claims to be a history of capitalism and it did nothing to tell that history. It didn't mention how civilization transitioned thru various economies as it transitioned thru various methods of organizing a nation state.

  • @pigslave3
    @pigslave3 8 ปีที่แล้ว +400

    "Uplifting television programs about tractor production." - I let out a hardy laugh at that line. xD

    • @1thelastmystic
      @1thelastmystic 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂

    • @romanbukins6527
      @romanbukins6527 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      pigslave3 It's the original "How it's Made"

    • @robinsss
      @robinsss 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it sounds about as exciting as American midwestern and southern culture

    • @robinsss
      @robinsss 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      what?

    • @dibyajyotidas8984
      @dibyajyotidas8984 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "keeping up with the Kardashians" is the real deal

  • @emilypasmoreable
    @emilypasmoreable 8 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    I am really enjoying these films. Thank you so much for putting them together. I do have a request, though. It would be so helpful if you all could include subtitles of the scripts that are being read. The automated closed captioning that TH-cam provides is not always accurate. As an educator, I can say that being able to read and watch at the same time would be a real enhancement to this curriculum for my students and me, making it easier to commit names and terms to memory without having to stop and look them all up as each film plays.

    • @DiegoBengoa
      @DiegoBengoa 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +The School of Life I want to add also once you have subs in english the next step is to have it in other lengages.
      I'm from Argentina (spanish speaking) and it would be very helpful because most of the people don't know english and also it would be easier even if you know.
      Thanks for your videos. they are very helpful.

    • @johnnybizaro1
      @johnnybizaro1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This video was biased and wrong in so many ways. It is amazing you are so ignorant.

  • @DavidSDoubleU
    @DavidSDoubleU 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    So in short: if we ditch capitalism, I won't be able to watch Celebrity Body Issues anymore?

    • @The-Real-JD
      @The-Real-JD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yep, only state propaganda about how the state knows best ... And tractors

    • @toesucker863
      @toesucker863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PysKa.512 cringe

    • @girlpower263
      @girlpower263 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would love that

    • @sahh9464
      @sahh9464 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      No...if we ditch capitalism you will starve. But he fails to make that point.

    • @reasonerenlightened2456
      @reasonerenlightened2456 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      In Capitalism there is only the owner and the Employee.
      Ultimately, the 'Employee' makes the products, takes those products to the market, sells the same products, he made, to himself and finally he pays a fee known as Profit to some 'Owner' for a permission to own the same products he made and sold to himself.
      The owner gets to collect profit for doing nothing.....and many call that 'earning' instead of 'taking'.

  • @chrisenglish4380
    @chrisenglish4380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    “Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities.”
    Frank Lloyd Wright

    • @2okaycola
      @2okaycola 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      #liberalism

    • @kiwitrainguy
      @kiwitrainguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds like the inverse of "Our needs are our wants".

    • @The-Real-JD
      @The-Real-JD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Do what you want with your money Frank but you won't last longer than 3 days without water

  • @Sooyush
    @Sooyush 4 ปีที่แล้ว +320

    Communism video: capitalism bad
    Capitalism video: capitalism bad

    • @DanielNyong
      @DanielNyong 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      Ikr the bias is real

    • @Sooyush
      @Sooyush 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      @@DanielNyong becoz capitalism is BAD
      Truth be truth

    • @Jack-xy4fy
      @Jack-xy4fy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      @@Sooyush capitalism is bad? Lol
      Says the guy using TH-cam
      On his android/apple phone
      With picture in his designer clothes...
      What a hypocrite.
      If you want socialim or communism go ahead and donate your salary to the government. You can do it on the treasury website.

    • @Sooyush
      @Sooyush 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@Jack-xy4fy Capitalism is selling of innovation, not creation. All the sciences weren't developed for a grant money. There's a thing called passion. I agree communism is so ideal that it cuts out necessities, which lack innovation. But not passion. So, capitalism is like having a gun to your head to get your work done, while communism says, take your time, live your life.
      I hope you'll read to respond not react.
      And by the way, Trump got impeached.

    • @Jack-xy4fy
      @Jack-xy4fy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@Sooyush Suyash K Kishore firstly, I know what capitalism is, so why did you explain it to me? At what point did I mention inventing anything? You still bought expensive products rather than buying a cheap locally made item, so you yourself are reaping the benefits of capitalism whilst saying its "bad"... That is why you are a hypocrite.
      Secondly if the iPhone was made for passion then why are apple multibillionaires and why are they not producing new innovations and rather just sticking other people's new innovations on their product... Oh that's right because it has nothing to do with passion and everything to do with keeping the market share..
      Take your time, live your life? Lol and if everyone does that then their is no innovation, just look at how little innovation comes from communist countries compared to capitalist.
      Finally I'm not American, so your ignorance couldn't be more clear than right now when you not only assume I'm a trump supporter, but assumed I'm American and also assumed that I'd even give a shit what you say about him.
      ...hillary clinton is nothing more than Bill clintons seamen recepticle and Obama only got into office because he is black and people felt obligated to vote for him to feel less guilty about being white in America 🤷‍♂️

  • @mr.e2962
    @mr.e2962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +526

    "When the course of civilization takes an unexpected turn we naturally blame anything but ourselves"
    - F. A. Hayek

    • @DKazzix
      @DKazzix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      well, gee, I guess the 2008 crash of Wall Street and financial crisis is my fault then. Fuck Hayek

    • @mr.e2962
      @mr.e2962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      @@DKazzix the 2008 crash of Wall Street and financial crisis was caused by government investment in non-sustainable markets, which leads to economic booms at first and then extreme busts at the end.

    • @0NoFreeWill0
      @0NoFreeWill0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@mr.e2962 Yeah nothing to do with how capitalism has literally always worked.... governments, oligopolies or monopolies etc. are everywhere and yet idiot libertarians pretend there's ever been or ever will be a "free" market. Right next to the slave markets I suppose...

    • @geol5448
      @geol5448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @@0NoFreeWill0 you do understand that goverment involvement is the basis of socialism though...

    • @0NoFreeWill0
      @0NoFreeWill0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@geol5448 Common ownership of the means of production is socialism. Government involvements in markets are like, the actual basis of capitalism even existing. Capitalism and the modern industrial nation-state are basically coextensive. If the government launching foreign wars to secure energy resources and cheap labor (slaves, oil, etc.) wasn't happening capitalism would cease to function. Not to mention the primitive accumulation (stealing land) that was supported by the government that got everything started.

  • @comradekenobi8146
    @comradekenobi8146 3 ปีที่แล้ว +360

    East Germans: Okay with secret police, oppressive Tankie regime, inefficient planned economy, and a lack of basic liberties we take for granted.
    Also East Germans: THE COFFEE'S GONE, LET'S RIOT!!!!

    • @TheAcad3mic
      @TheAcad3mic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      There is a staggeringly important lesson nested inside that... Complicated, bitter but obscure truths can and will endure in the heart of the common populace, but once enough people can't get whatever it is they consider important, then the shit truly hits the fan.

    • @dirkscott5410
      @dirkscott5410 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      They also did women’s rights, free childcare and recycled cars.

    • @comradekenobi8146
      @comradekenobi8146 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@dirkscott5410 Sure, I never claimed the totalitarian regimes running the communist bloc countries were the epitomy of evil. But I strongly disagree with any government that censors people who speak against the interests of the state.

    • @Innocence44
      @Innocence44 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      caffeine is a hell of a drug

    • @DzondzulaKarakondzula
      @DzondzulaKarakondzula 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That's how it goes, people will take it and take it, endure the systemic decay and the worsening of the overall conditions, until one day something trivial like coffee or something trite in comparison to the overall issues that people aren't reacting to, will spark a volcanic eruption of dissent.

  • @GamingAlgen
    @GamingAlgen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Money won't bring you happiness...... but COFFEEEEE WILLLL DOOOOOO

  • @avirupchatterjee6940
    @avirupchatterjee6940 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    loved it... so well explained... i love the editor... nobody talks about him! i know the narrator has a very soothing voice... but this team is briliiant... i love this channel... \m/

    • @Dowlphin
      @Dowlphin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wonder how much money they put into the marketing machinery to promote their channel against the sea of competition in this gladiator arena.

    • @DEMiURGE455
      @DEMiURGE455 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice…sentence…structure…

  • @oasisneko1
    @oasisneko1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +837

    To anybody who is not blindly communist, Marxist, capitalist, etc. but does not exclude those viewpoints either, this makes a lot of sense.

    • @invaderHUNK
      @invaderHUNK 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      A pity all the comments seem to be under those persuasions.

    • @taphos9469
      @taphos9469 7 ปีที่แล้ว +122

      blindly following an ideology is harmfull. It doesnt matter what ideology it is

    • @the1andonlytitch
      @the1andonlytitch 7 ปีที่แล้ว +93

      Yeah unfortunately you are often labelled as a communist or a Marxist if you don't blindly follow capitalism

    • @the1andonlytitch
      @the1andonlytitch 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      +Ian Blasso Most people cannot differentiate between criticism and rejection

    • @Jaymzmiller
      @Jaymzmiller 7 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      A lot of people think that their systems are all one or all another without realising just how blended they can get. One might live in a highly capitalistic society, but if you pay taxes that keep the street lights on or the get the bins collected, well, you've got elements of socialism in your country. The problems with each system are mostly due to the depth of their implementation, not just implementing them at all.

  • @HaNahar411
    @HaNahar411 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is auch a high quality video! Thanks for all the effort put in!

  • @bonn94
    @bonn94 3 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    "Too much sensibility creates unhappiness and too much insensibility creates crime."
    - Talleyrand
    It's a balancing act people.

    • @inigobantok1579
      @inigobantok1579 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's why malthus is right at some aspect, balancing what we already have, and the Austrian economists

    • @gking407
      @gking407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No civilization has ever gone extinct because of too much sensibility. I’m thinking sensibility means rational here.

    • @lovelyhomeboy1584
      @lovelyhomeboy1584 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gking407 I mean the greeks

  • @cocoTr33
    @cocoTr33 7 ปีที่แล้ว +262

    Disappointed that there was no mention of Keynes, Hayek, or Friedman. You can't quite summarize fully the development of capitalism without mentioning the works of these economists and their applications by world leaders.

    • @FR0980Y
      @FR0980Y 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Unfortunately, whoever makes these videos doesn't have any grasp of capitalism.

    • @agustinbaletti
      @agustinbaletti 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      He's a mediocre IGNORANT so don't care about it....

    • @MisterSpeedStacking
      @MisterSpeedStacking 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      >Friedman
      oh no no no....
      >chile
      WHEEEEEEZZEEE

    • @marka3122
      @marka3122 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@FR0980Y because this specific video doesn't contain all of what capitalism is. There's a reason they have OTHER videos.

    • @FR0980Y
      @FR0980Y 5 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@marka3122
      Perhaps you're correct. I just rewatched the video and my assessment wasn't completely accurate. It's not so much their knowledge of capitalism that's lacking. My issue is more with the implications the video makes. The problems that it details, and many others espouse, also happen to be the very reason why capitalism is so successful. They can't be divorced from each other.
      The experimental nature of capitalism is precisely why it works. No one can really predict whether something like smart watches will be a revolutionary invention until it's tried in the market. Turns out that they aren't really all that useful but hindsight is 20/20. I was alive when home computers were considered by people, who pretended to be in the know, to be just a fad that would die out soon. Nothing of any real practical use. Had central planners control over what products and services could be offered to the masses, we might live in a completely different world.
      As for child labor, harsh working conditions and "exploitation of labor", many people of today, yesterday and forever socialists, always make the mistake of looking at the past through the rose-colored lens of the modern day. They also mistakenly view events as snapshots in time as opposed to its full context. Slavery was an institution from the beginning of time until very recently. Child labor also always existed as well. The wealth creation and economic gains of capitalism is the one and only reason why these things have been removed from society. If children still needed to work in order for people to not starve to death, no one would think twice about it. It's only when we became wealthy enough that there was virtually no place for children in the workforce that we got rid of it. Many nations still haven't reached that point yet but they will soon. And when they do, I'll bet you dollars to donuts that they do the same exact thing we did: outlaw child labor. Unless the world totally fraks things up, we'll see a world without legal child labor very soon (50-100 years).
      Freedom and capitalism is and has quickly improved the world. We would be so much worse off without them. I just hope that we keep moving forward.

  • @bobpolo2964
    @bobpolo2964 8 ปีที่แล้ว +794

    Jesus Christ was upset with the merchants because they were using "His church" as a market place. He wasn't upset with them conducting business, but only where they were conducting it. "My house shall be called a house of prayer." Matthew 21:13

    • @WhatYourGrandpaSays
      @WhatYourGrandpaSays 6 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      right!

    • @Danskadreng
      @Danskadreng 6 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      I have a tiny guess that you guys probably are Republicans :)

    • @WhatYourGrandpaSays
      @WhatYourGrandpaSays 6 ปีที่แล้ว +96

      Krunk Classic lol, does it matter? Democrats or republicans, don't we just want to state facts?

    • @Danskadreng
      @Danskadreng 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Solomon Chang: I just find it funny how the majority of American Christians support the Republican party like they're in some sort of denial of who and what Jesus really represented. That was more my point to it :)

    • @WhatYourGrandpaSays
      @WhatYourGrandpaSays 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Krunk Classic so what do you think Jesus represented?

  • @Hamada_Intifada
    @Hamada_Intifada 2 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    Imagine writing a book so influential it changes the course of history

    • @inigobantok1579
      @inigobantok1579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      So many books are like that outside of economic literatures

    • @jaidevphadke9293
      @jaidevphadke9293 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@inigobantok1579 tell us a few, perhaps we can read them

    • @quantumfizzics9265
      @quantumfizzics9265 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@jaidevphadke9293 peppa pig's countdown to bedtime

    • @fightersroots3531
      @fightersroots3531 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jaidevphadke9293 the last wish

    • @electrickeese236
      @electrickeese236 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jaidevphadke9293 the story about aliens I wrote when I was 6

  • @Hermandari
    @Hermandari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very good and unusually honest summary of the situation in East Germany. Many East Germans still had relatives in West Germany, who would sometimes send packages with products from West Germany, like coffee, chocolate, or clothes (some of which were ironically produced for export in East Germany). West German TV antennas radiated far into East German territory, and a majority could (and did) watch West German TV commercials.
    This steady, but slow trickle of the luxuries of capitalism did more to fuel the reunification than fear of the Stasi or any political issue, because it concerned the whole population, not only a small elite of dissident intellectuals.

  • @benwest7420
    @benwest7420 7 ปีที่แล้ว +837

    In socialism you wait for bread
    In capitalism bread waits for you

    • @jcvideo1001
      @jcvideo1001 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      well said

    • @jordanhardee7836
      @jordanhardee7836 7 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      In a poor capitalist country you wait for bread
      In a rich capitalist country bread waits for you
      In a poor socialist country you wait for bread
      in a rich capitalist country bread waits for you

    • @tidakpenting8631
      @tidakpenting8631 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Be rich or be a socialist

    • @patrickvangelder3349
      @patrickvangelder3349 7 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      you can also have a good life without being rich, ever thought about that option?

    • @jandenuijl4287
      @jandenuijl4287 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Patrick Van Gelder what if you get cancer? Then you are fucking broke

  • @MustafaKulle
    @MustafaKulle 9 ปีที่แล้ว +298

    Finally! An unbiased video on capitalism that states its strengths AND its weaknesses. And on how its problems can be addressed.
    Thank you.

    • @johnnybizaro1
      @johnnybizaro1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      It was biased, The pictures in the front could be from capitalism as much as socialism. The lie about Soviet expansionism was in other videos in the series as if capitalism competed directly with socialism is a lie. The Soviet let the foreign fighters fight their own wars. Though the real solutions like democratic worker owned cooperatives is not mentioned. That is very disappointing.

    • @PeterM8987
      @PeterM8987 7 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Yes. A pity his video on Marxism was entirely focused on its strengths.

    • @MustafaKulle
      @MustafaKulle 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Peter Marendy Yes, it's true.
      That video was quited biased tho. At least this one is balanced. I think it's better to mention the advantages and the disadvantages of any idea.

    • @ruisilva9100
      @ruisilva9100 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But he was talking about Marxism in theory, not what actually happens, but he still managed to tell that most Marxist ideals turned to be the worst dictatorships (or the best, depends on who sees it)

    • @r13hd22
      @r13hd22 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Compared to the Communist video, this one is heavily biased...half the video was more anti-capitalism than anything while the Communism video merely states that it had a fatal flaw yet still raved about how great it was.

  • @glm4054
    @glm4054 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What's amazing is that Alain has hope that we can get it right💞

  • @angelb.823
    @angelb.823 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Back in my high school days, one professor handled copies of the book: "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" by Max Weber during a lecture on the subject regarding Sociology in Religion. It was my first touch and though on how societies like those in capitalistic countries in the West originated around the common lives in Protestant communities.

  • @sambosalis6628
    @sambosalis6628 5 ปีที่แล้ว +362

    Karl Marx advocated for communism, but wrote a lot on capitalism more than anyone, there is no way you talk about capitalism without mentioning Karl Marx.

    • @stroodlepup
      @stroodlepup 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      He wrote about the bourgeois, while acting like one himself

    • @alialridahammoud990
      @alialridahammoud990 4 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      @@stroodlepup how in any manner was Karl Marx one of the bourgeois . he lived in dept until a communist bourgeois helped him out . but in no other manner was he a traitor to his own class .

    • @joshuaacosta5671
      @joshuaacosta5671 4 ปีที่แล้ว +124

      Ali Al Rida Hammoud And even if he was a part of the bourgeois, that doesn’t invalidate his criticisms against the system. You can criticize an oppressive system even if you’re in a position to benefit, something right wingers don’t understand

    • @jordantoni1306
      @jordantoni1306 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@stroodlepup You a full of... In what way he was acting like a bourgeois?! 🙄

    • @jackyniu5194
      @jackyniu5194 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Donn Jeferson Atienza
      Consider free education to relearn history
      *But wait, free education is a idea created by Karl Marx*

  • @TheSecondVersion
    @TheSecondVersion 5 ปีที่แล้ว +191

    7:02 - I agree with the video, but like, wasn't Venice built on proto-capitalism? That city grew filthy rich from being a vital tradeing post between western Europe and the East

    • @MrCustomabstract
      @MrCustomabstract 5 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Yes but at that point in time, the capitalism that was being practiced in Venice did not involve any factories and certainly not to the extent of the UK at that time.

    • @TheGroovyJones
      @TheGroovyJones 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @fabian michelsson Venice was brought up as an example of what that one guy thought money should be spent on instead of frivolous tchotchke. The channel isn't a detractor or critic, its doing a *history* of capitalism. Pretty defensive there (1930) what do you have to be (2008) so defensive about?

    • @Oleander410
      @Oleander410 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Venice was built on being terrified of the Huns.

    • @DanFeldmanAgileProjectManager
      @DanFeldmanAgileProjectManager 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      No, Venice was not built on proto-capitalism. Proto-capitalism started in Great Britain with agrarian capitalism which was precipitated by Locke’s new definition of private property and the creation of vast spaces of enclosures which destroyed the commons (lands for common use) upon which much of the peasant class required to farm and hunt. Renaissance Florence and Venice were not proto-capitalist economies.

    • @DanFeldmanAgileProjectManager
      @DanFeldmanAgileProjectManager 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @fabian michelsson
      Capitalism is not the natural culmination of history. Mercantilism is not an early form of capitalism. There are no early forms of capitalism.
      Capitalism represents a historically specific social form and a historic rupture with earlier forms.
      “Vastly successful commercial city-states like Florence [and Venice] did not give rise to capitalism, while capitalism did emerge in England, whose cities, in the context of a precociously centralized monarchical state, were arguably among the least autonomous in Europe.” -Ellen Meiksins Wood
      “The critical factor in the divergence of capitalism from all other forms of ‘commercial society’ was the development of certain social property relations that generated market imperatives and capitalist ‘laws of motion’, which imposed themselves on production. The great non-capitalist commercial powers had producing classes and especially peasants who remained in possession of their means of subsistence, and land in particular. They were ruled and exploited by dominant classes and states that relied on ‘extra-economic’ appropriation or ‘politically constituted property’ of various kinds. These great civilizations were not systematically subjected to the pressures of competitive production and profit-maximization, the compulsion to reinvest surpluses, and the relentless need to improve labour-productivity associated with capitalism.” -Ellen Meiksins Wood
      “Capitalism is a system in which goods and services, down to the most basic necessities of life, are produced for profitable exchange, where even human labour-power is a commodity for sale in the market, and where all economic actors are dependent on the market. This is true not only of workers, who must sell their labour-power for a wage, but also of capitalists, who depend on the market to buy their inputs, including labour-power, and to sell their output for profit. Capitalism differs from other social forms because producers depend on the market for access to the means of production (unlike, for instance, peasants, who remain in direct, non-market possession of land); while appropriators cannot rely on ‘extra-economic’ powers of appropriation by means of direct coercion - such as the military, political, and judicial powers that enable feudal lords to extract surplus labour from peasants - but must depend on the purely ‘economic’ mechanisms of the market. ” Ellen Meiksins Wood, The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View

  • @jrezecordero7943
    @jrezecordero7943 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    this totaly sums up our world and how we lived in it

  • @wuhuislandnewspaper5675
    @wuhuislandnewspaper5675 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this channel. So informational

  • @ncyclo106
    @ncyclo106 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Great video! I've learned a lot with you, keep doing a great job.

  • @TeosAntagonian
    @TeosAntagonian 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    So when is "celebrity body issues" coming out?

    • @charlietube7165
      @charlietube7165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When they die

    • @caithrina
      @caithrina 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm imagining Allain de Botton delivering this as a public lecture and this being the first question from the audience during the Q &A session. Lol

  • @Mia-rf1pu
    @Mia-rf1pu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love your channel i used to binge watch your videos all the time

  • @rpb4865
    @rpb4865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    4:56 you forgot looting & exploiting colonies bro. That was the main reason

    • @pedronabais1456
      @pedronabais1456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      the london industry didnt grew because of the colonies lol how would that work?

    • @__-ls4vk
      @__-ls4vk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@pedronabais1456 taxation and exploitation of resources

    • @PandasUncle
      @PandasUncle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@__-ls4vk pretty sure britain lost money on the colonies no? either wya the bulk of the money came from the reaosns listed in the vid

    • @bboynava1812
      @bboynava1812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no "main reason". Want it or not, capitalism allows for economies to grow. Not saying is perfect, or that there is no poberty or explotation, but we just need to accept this truth.

    • @__-ls4vk
      @__-ls4vk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@PandasUncle Britain wasn't thinking short term with their plans. There's a reason the US has conflict mineral policies. The industries that were setup by the imperialistic powers last century (such as the diamond industry) were built to extract resources and build dependence. That's why you'll see so much corruption in the continent of Africa. The leaders were planted with connections from foreign countries who helped to build the infrastructure and were funded by outside countries to restrict the flow of resources to certain countries. Just look at what happened in Nicaragua as well... funding from outside countries destroyed any hope of building free enterprise during that time. Not shifting any blame away from the leader's of these countries but there were outside pressures and going against them back then was not a good idea - especially if you did not have a strong military.

  • @chibuzorifediorah5045
    @chibuzorifediorah5045 3 ปีที่แล้ว +218

    I wonder what Bible you read, Jesus was also a carpenter who made and sold wood wears.
    He was angry at the people in the temple not for selling stuff but for cheating and stealing

    • @jameswilliams3241
      @jameswilliams3241 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Jesus was upset for a number of reasons with the money changers and animal salesmen, first these men in violation of Mosaic laws loaned money at profit ( unlawful and on temple grounds) and second sold blemished and unsound animals (also in violation of law) it was the desecration of temple grounds and violation of Mosaic law that he objected to, not capitalism per se. It was St. Paul who said "... for the LOVE of money is the root of all sorts of injurious things. "

    • @numberpirate
      @numberpirate 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      References?

    • @johnmarkharris
      @johnmarkharris 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You are correct. He describes them as “thieves” while driving them out.

    • @mennovanlavieren3885
      @mennovanlavieren3885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It is not about which bible he reads, it is about what the church clergy made of it. They had their agenda of keeping people poor and dependent upon the church. He said it right, and even broadens his views by mentioning how John Calvin indirectly promoted capitalism with his teaching on virtues.

    • @chibuzorifediorah5045
      @chibuzorifediorah5045 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@mennovanlavieren3885
      "Keeping the people poor"? Throughout history everyone has been poor.
      If you were not a king or noble or distinguished in battle, by definition you were poor aka a peasant.
      Probably in the last 100 t0 200 years, capitalism has helped lift people out of poverty.
      I own a business, I love capitalism.
      Jesus never encouraged socialism, nor laziness
      My problem with his take is that he claims Jesus was against capitalism.
      The same Jesus that condemned the unproductive servant in the Parable Of The Talent Matthew 25:14-30
      The same Jesus that stated what we now call the Mathew Effect (Aka The Law of 1% accumulation)
      "For to every one who has will more be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away."
      - Matthew 25:29
      To me it doesn't add up, has misinterpretation of the Bible for ill intent, occurred in the past, ofcourse, it even happens today
      Probably it's the same misinterpretation that exists in this video which has dragged us all down here to the comment section
      Good for the algorithm, views ranking and subscribers. Kudos

  • @kristinhulk5626
    @kristinhulk5626 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I believe in spending in things that are actually worth the cost. Mostly in things that will surely be handy in present as well as in the future. Thanks for teaching me this wonderful lesson.

  • @nikzad2167
    @nikzad2167 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such a fair & educational comparison...thank you

  • @btetschner
    @btetschner 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very clear explanation, thank you for the video.

  • @wheelsmcdealsace
    @wheelsmcdealsace 5 ปีที่แล้ว +320

    when water cost more then beer, soda and soon milkshakes

    • @briansandlin8194
      @briansandlin8194 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I never even noticed

    • @andym28
      @andym28 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A true test of darwinism

    • @st.paulmn9159
      @st.paulmn9159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Darwinism is expecting the wrong answers & then coming forth thinking you have something

    • @jjQlLlLq
      @jjQlLlLq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I'm surprised to find that out! Potable water isn't available to drink freely out of taps here, but water is always the cheapest drink you can get anywhere! It's crazy to think how soda is somehow cheaper than plain water.

    • @treymccain8164
      @treymccain8164 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I guess that depends on where you live? Potable tap water is free where I live in the United States. Bottles of water are 2/ $1.59 at convenience stores.

  • @ElDelSak
    @ElDelSak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Why a minimum wage and not a maximum one. Why minimum annual earnings (poverty line) and not a maximum of annual earnings (line of unethical wealth) ? Are resources infinite and inexhaustible ? Or does trickle down economics really work?

    • @regangordon4842
      @regangordon4842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      because that’s communism

    • @coppersense999
      @coppersense999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly. Abundance not scarcity. Trickle UP economics.
      Human-centered capitalism that puts people before profits, always.
      And include everyone in a healthy econ-system. Those who are retired, disabled, going to school full-time, stay-at-home moms, artists, basically all the "others" whose lives we assign no value, or as only having potential value, which wil be evident once they are willing to exploit themselves serving food to strangers for $7/hour. It is a slap in the face, bringing someone food for starvation wages. "THAT is all you are worth woman, now smile and make nice if you want this two dollar tip."
      The good news is: UBI. We don't all have to contribute and receive value in the same way. Andrew Yang's book explains it better than I can, based on facts and common sense: "The War on Normal People." Elon Musk, Billl Gates, MLK Jr all came out in public support of UBI.

    • @imagin.e.ternity
      @imagin.e.ternity 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. If there is a minimum wage there should be a maximum wage.
      Otherwise dont put any limits or "requirements" on wage.

    • @ElDelSak
      @ElDelSak 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imagin.e.ternity minimum wage is essential if we are not to go back to slavery. But no maximum yearly earnings, in capitalism (=that is never ending accumulation of capital in $ and commodities) leads to the "1% owning 50/60/80/90% (i don't really know the numbers) of global wealth" phenomenon

    • @CanditoTrainingHQ
      @CanditoTrainingHQ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The problem is it's easier to prove someone is getting a minimum wage, and harder to prove someone has exceeded a maximum wage. Look at Putin. He's rumored to be worth tends of billions of dollars that are undisclosed. Unfortunately, what probably would happen is politicians + intelligence agencies would have immense power over the world's wealth (likely becoming the richest people in their nations), and that effect would likely be worse than investment-capitalism.

  • @ArthurBrooklyn
    @ArthurBrooklyn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    amazing that in almost a quarter of an hour - a 5 secon definition of capitalism was avoided - bravo

    • @TeaParty1776
      @TeaParty1776 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Its an appeal to emotion. See Ayn Rand's, _Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal_, for a principled, systematic view, w/definitions.

    • @jamestavella1398
      @jamestavella1398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      ...and how Fuedalism and merchantilism were completely avoided. Those are critical policies that transcends the reasons for Capitalism.

    • @ArthurBrooklyn
      @ArthurBrooklyn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @Renegade Red from a practical (non-theoretical) point of view, you just defined communism.

    • @breandadavis3168
      @breandadavis3168 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@ArthurBrooklyn you literally dont know what communism is then lol

    • @kyyah2
      @kyyah2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @Renegade Red not true

  • @geekpie100
    @geekpie100 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I am gradually working my way through these "History Of" videos; I invariably learn a lot.

  • @BrettHar123
    @BrettHar123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Three major topics - not discussed:
    Central Banking, fractional lending, and fiat currency - criminal scam.
    The Economic Calculation Problem - Government, taxation and corruption, small as possible.
    The Pareto Principle and IQ, beauty, physical ability, personality, creativity, empathy, anything that is valued by people will be selected - there will always be inequality.
    Capitalism is just evolution of information and productivity, for evolution to work there must be selection, and optimal use of available resources.

    • @dieyoung
      @dieyoung 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thank you. You can't have capitalism with central banking and monopolies over the production of monies.

    • @TheGroovyJones
      @TheGroovyJones 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Capitalism is a system designed to take money away from productive working people and give it to a tiny few who do nothing so they can have mansions and yachts. It does that REALLY well. If it didn't have the tools you listed it would find other tools (like paying government officials for beneficial results) to achieve the same goal.

    • @matrixman8582
      @matrixman8582 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheGroovyJones How are those "tiny few" getting that money?

    • @matiasgarciacasas558
      @matiasgarciacasas558 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@matrixman8582 they get it by making people work and paying them enough to keep them alive and working, then selling the products of their work for more money.
      Sorry i know this is an old comment

    • @matrixman8582
      @matrixman8582 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@matiasgarciacasas558 How are they able to pay them?

  • @nasirhasan1
    @nasirhasan1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nice video, it's good to see how different ideologies have evolved through history, see how different people view them and practiced them.

  • @francismausley7239
    @francismausley7239 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "Material advancement has been evident in the world, but there is need of spiritual advancement in like proportion." ~ 'Abdu'l-Bahá, Bahai Faith

  • @wendymonroybonilla2819
    @wendymonroybonilla2819 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That’s eye opening, thank you. I’ll try to find out more.

  • @latebloomer4755
    @latebloomer4755 8 ปีที่แล้ว +283

    This did nothing to explain what capitalism is.

    • @steeltoecommunist6980
      @steeltoecommunist6980 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Thats what dictionares are for

    • @latebloomer4755
      @latebloomer4755 8 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      Dictionaries are for learning how to spell the word dictionary. Not explaining complex political ideas.

    • @steeltoecommunist6980
      @steeltoecommunist6980 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      english is my second language. the common definition is private ownership over the means of production in a market economy

    • @daemonnice
      @daemonnice 8 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      actually it did everything it can to distort what capitalism is.

    • @JonasTheBonas
      @JonasTheBonas 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It totaly did

  • @bolivar1789
    @bolivar1789 8 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Watching this great lesson, I remembered poor Citizen Kane...Friends who haven't seen it yet, indeed really should. Some say it is the best movie of all times. Spanish philosopher Fernando Savater wrote a book called Amador for his 15 year old son, to teach him Ethics and there he talks about the movie:
    "Citizen Kane devoted many years to selling all his people so that he could buy all his things; and at the end of his life he realizes that if he could he would trade in his palace full of expensive possessions for the one humble object- an old sled- that reminded him of a certain person, namely, himself, before he gave himself up to buying and selling , when he preferred loving and being loved".
    You may think it is an innocent and harmless thing to buy all that stuff you don't need. But indeed it is a moral obligation to analyse yourself everytime thinking " what do I want this for" ?? Frankly I think no one would ever buy a Vuitton bag for 2.000 euros, if they were not allowed to show it to anybody! It is all about asking for attention, recognition and being loved, but there are many other, healthier ways for it!

    • @vexling111
      @vexling111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you. Lovely comment

    • @bolivar1789
      @bolivar1789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@vexling111 Hello Casper. Thank you for reading! Stay safe :- )

  • @baine3388
    @baine3388 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    "Dangerous ideas bottled behind a silver tongue only leads to tragidy"

    • @geoffdavids7647
      @geoffdavids7647 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hahaha I love this - what in your eyes is the dangerous idea?

    • @oskar1076
      @oskar1076 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Darío Puertas good guess, but it was capitalism..

  • @AllInOurHead
    @AllInOurHead 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful. Thanks for doing this.

  • @noahlewisbrown
    @noahlewisbrown 7 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    It's amazing how suddenly the comments are full of economic experts...

    • @starlordjae2577
      @starlordjae2577 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's only common sense, which mustn't so common since you're lacking

    • @rackets7991
      @rackets7991 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      its called Google..You can check instead of just believing what you read or hear..

    • @kx7500
      @kx7500 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rackets lol and everything you find on google is accurate

    • @Yuh_mama
      @Yuh_mama 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Understanding the economic systems doesn’t take expertise. It’s pretty basic. And when you talk about the differences that’s all you need.

  • @motionmarketer4762
    @motionmarketer4762 7 ปีที่แล้ว +326

    "The British economy is the largest in the world thanks to industry, ship building, cotton mills."( read colonization)

    • @shinminmetroskyline
      @shinminmetroskyline 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Got em

    • @EL_ClD
      @EL_ClD 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      because of the boatload of gold the conquistadors returned to spain, and they didn't exactly understand inflation.

    • @will-fg1gu
      @will-fg1gu 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Bruh, colonization didn't really make much money at all. In fact, when Britain was debating whether to give autonomy to India, a British economist calculated Britain was actually losing money by keeping India.

    • @motionmarketer4762
      @motionmarketer4762 7 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      +william hopper That was towards the end of colonization when Britain had drained all of it's wealth fighting the wars and also caused a famine in India.Churchill didn't care much.India was a pool which provided more than 2 million soldiers to the allies to fight the axis nations. A very little known fact.

    • @aaron4820
      @aaron4820 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      At risk of sounding like a traitor that brings shame to my ancestors, I was born in Hong Kong and I can't quite imagine what this city would be like in my lifetime if it weren't for the British's colonization.

  • @reddish_orange
    @reddish_orange 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is such a fantastic channel

  • @stephenbaker7079
    @stephenbaker7079 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    A very well presented, succinct documentary, with excellent graphics. Thank you.

  • @cotywittmeyer4604
    @cotywittmeyer4604 5 ปีที่แล้ว +149

    I'm for a world that has "holiday camps" with nude volleyball 7:29

    • @dexstewart2450
      @dexstewart2450 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Go to Wannsee, between Berlin and Potsdam - goes on every Summer. It's also the place where the Nazis planned their 'Final Solution'.

    • @schlorpnavekapitalismam8546
      @schlorpnavekapitalismam8546 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dexstewart2450 sounds good

    • @justing8821
      @justing8821 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I will sell you a ticket for 40 dollars

    • @lemat579
      @lemat579 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, a nice ass. I spot it too😂👍

    • @adrianw7238
      @adrianw7238 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      he may use his di*ks to hit the volleyball, it's a skill

  • @TheeBlackSilhouette
    @TheeBlackSilhouette 4 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    Ones income is another’s spending.

    • @alenpaul2523
      @alenpaul2523 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Not necessarily

    • @Harvindersingh-yg5kz
      @Harvindersingh-yg5kz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@alenpaul2523 yes its a fact if u spend something thats from there companies earn who i turn pays you back

    • @Graceleus
      @Graceleus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Alen Paul - No, necessarily.

    • @krishnakanthhh
      @krishnakanthhh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ray dalio!

    • @TheeBlackSilhouette
      @TheeBlackSilhouette 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      krishna kanth yes thanks for catching the reference

  • @petersinger9049
    @petersinger9049 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    entertaining and informative, carefully presented.

  • @hydrxyMoron
    @hydrxyMoron 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I loved this. Is there a source list for this video for further reading?

  • @iwillknifeya
    @iwillknifeya 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Thank you for posting this great video. I learned a lot!
    Keep up the excellent work!

  • @Biogrrrl
    @Biogrrrl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    But "Celebrity Body Issues" is my favorite show! 😂

    • @rackets7991
      @rackets7991 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Tractor production on channel 1 had more viewers..

    • @charlietube7165
      @charlietube7165 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You a simp

  • @RandomUser_online
    @RandomUser_online 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    loving this channel

  • @christophermetz1550
    @christophermetz1550 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The beauty of capitalism is that you always have a choice. Just because products are cheap and potentially unhealthy for instance, does not mean you are forced to purchase those products. I'm currently commenting using a 5-year-old smartphone and checking the time on my $18 Casio digital watch with a 10-year battery that I don't plan on changing for another 9 years. Companies will always try to market things to people that they do not need. It is the responsibility of the individual to make the choice as to whether or not they partake in those purchases. I've heard the argument a million times that because a company makes something that people think they need then it is the evil capitalists forcing individuals to buy those things and forcing people into slavery to produce them. In a capitalist system, everything is based on choice. The choice to purchase, the choice to produce, and the choice to own one's own labor and be compensated at a rate mutually agreed upon by the employer and the laborer.

    • @Lenapolitainn
      @Lenapolitainn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You seem to live in a fantastic world

    • @douglasmiller4700
      @douglasmiller4700 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Best comment I've read on this video

    • @migaloo364
      @migaloo364 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can do this in a socialist and/or communist system too bruv. Look at Yugoslavia for example.

  • @JRed-jf7jn
    @JRed-jf7jn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +412

    This is the worst comment section I’ve ever seen.

    • @controlyourlife346
      @controlyourlife346 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Borlng as well

    • @hexa3389
      @hexa3389 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Yeah. Everyone here is missing the point.

    • @hexa3389
      @hexa3389 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @joe buffalo fam I watched this video a month ago and I'm too bored to watch it again so figure it out on your own.
      Sorry if I sounded rude.

    • @TylerSolvestri
      @TylerSolvestri 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      You are communist, so that's why.

    • @controlyourlife346
      @controlyourlife346 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Tyler Solvestri 🥱

  • @djcool60
    @djcool60 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    Christianity against capitalism is the greatest joke I've ever heard.

    • @sjewitt22
      @sjewitt22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why?

    • @sjewitt22
      @sjewitt22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@amohferr3726 Capitalism can certainly bring out greed in people and society, it needs to be watched I think.

    • @whtwht
      @whtwht 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sjewitt22 this.

    • @isokessu
      @isokessu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In my country the Christian party is left wing

    • @isokessu
      @isokessu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I mean it's not my country because I'm not president but my user name means Big Caesar XD

  • @kittenclawsguitarvideos6147
    @kittenclawsguitarvideos6147 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was so interesting, I learned a lot

  • @scryptog7853
    @scryptog7853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "Conclusion" at 10:49 while fiat symbols filled the screen.
    Sound reasoning Dorthy. No need to look behind that curtain.

  • @thomasjordan2153
    @thomasjordan2153 6 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    ‘Capitalism downgrades the important spiritual factors of life, and swaps them for Cheeseburgers’ -The School of Life, a business which sell anti-capitalism notebooks for $20.

    • @gibby9298
      @gibby9298 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Thomas Jordan lmaoooo

    • @TheInsaiyan
      @TheInsaiyan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      This! Lmfao

    • @largeinsize1
      @largeinsize1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      LOL I think the point is that instead of spending money on Cheezeburgers you spend it on anti-capitalist books

    • @omniusmaximusgluteuslxix4857
      @omniusmaximusgluteuslxix4857 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Nice tu quoque fallacy there buddy! Why not just condense your stunningly witty comment to it's true meaning: "You criticize society, and yet you live in society!!!"

    • @navyasharma2750
      @navyasharma2750 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Andrew Cox that's the truth what you have spoken , we shall stop rhe socialists

  • @isaiahfalconcomedy9878
    @isaiahfalconcomedy9878 5 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    Please include your references in the description box!

    • @ricardorien
      @ricardorien 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes!

    • @ayushithakur9059
      @ayushithakur9059 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      definitely!!

    • @davehedric1543
      @davehedric1543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Why would they do that if all they are doing is spreading beautiful and colorful propoganda?
      God forbid you'd fact check them.

    • @alafolieee
      @alafolieee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@davehedric1543 oh, could you enlight us on what their "propoganda" is?

    • @0NoFreeWill0
      @0NoFreeWill0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@alafolieee it's obvious that making a video about capitalism without mentioning colonialism, slavery (more than a tiny box about Adam Smith), Marx and his contributions to understanding how the system works, labor exploitation as a source/necessary for profit, imperialist wars, is propaganda lol.

  • @elenadarling4697
    @elenadarling4697 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ugh this is SO much better than crash course, the guy just goes too fast and adds too many random nerd references.
    Thank you for an educational well done video!

  • @BeefisGold
    @BeefisGold 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This videos are so good.

  • @Dave451996
    @Dave451996 8 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    We seriously need a History of ideas - Eugenics, most don´t know it´s surprisingly long history.

    • @distortedflameingic
      @distortedflameingic 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      agreed

    • @nanomantube
      @nanomantube 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +The Hunt for Red May Right? Most only know what came out of it.. like the Holocaust and Planned Parenthood...ehem

    • @Dave451996
      @Dave451996 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      nanomantube Eugenics has a long (and rather dark) history in the US and Canada too. Unfortunately the topic is often reduced to one of historys biggest crimes.

    • @GentleEsther
      @GentleEsther 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All the way back to Sparta. And before. Eugenics can be seen in a grey light, not just a horrible one

    • @Dave451996
      @Dave451996 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      GentleEsther exactly

  • @VinaX2R
    @VinaX2R 8 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    3:50 so if slavery was economically efficient we would still have it, lovely

    • @czisildur
      @czisildur 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Guten economically in the long run = logically and fairly

    • @axtyab969
      @axtyab969 8 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      Capitalism is voluntary exchange- slavery is not.

    • @rogelioarguello2800
      @rogelioarguello2800 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      as long as sense (and meaning) in life is given by money (capital), we're f····d. And yes, Capitalism is voluntary exchange, but as long as it gets any profit. If slavery would get you any profit, it could be considered then (as logical and even as fair). In fact, regarding actual exploitation and general world poverty, I don't think we're very far from a form of slavery. That's why is so dangerous a claim such as Locke's who wanted that Poetry was not taught anymore in schools... because it was not practical enough (that is, because you cannot make money out of it).

    • @evaburnz
      @evaburnz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I completely agree, there are masses of individuals across the globe who only partake in their line of employment because they have no other choice due to extremely low living conditions.

    • @mystic13337
      @mystic13337 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If it didn't create profit there would be no incentive for the producer to produce.

  • @dirkscott5410
    @dirkscott5410 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    “…the oppression of the poor must always establish the monopoly of the rich, who by engrossing the whole trade to themselves will be able to make very large profits… the rate of profit is always highest in the countries which are going fastest to ruin.” An Enquiry Into The Nature And Causes of The Wealth Of Nations, Adam Smith 1858

    • @paratame105
      @paratame105 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Damn, thank you for this quote.

    • @paratame105
      @paratame105 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @KAOS NATION In Germany, we refer to what you are proposing as 'Social Democracy' and it's embedded in our constitution.

    • @MDQPRODUCTIONS
      @MDQPRODUCTIONS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      monopoly its not the name,because monopoly cant exist in a free market, byou mean Big companies, that also means faster production and lower cost, which means lower prices so actually it helps people, they are saving money that now they can spend in some other product helping another shop to grow.
      And the only way monopoly exist is because of the state and its regulations that always are better for minorities. with free markets, monopolys doesnt exist, its just how everything evolve, and if you think about it "monopolys" or big companies are the one that give us Computers and vaccinations, also industrial revolution. So Capitalism is the way the human keeps evolving, now using his mind to keep the wheel spining.

    • @daemonnice
      @daemonnice 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @KAOS NATION you drank the american capitalist koolaid . I suggest you read the writings of the man who actually first coined the word in an economic treatise - Marx, and stop listening to right wing propaganda which you have done a great job of explaining.
      Capitalism has always been an oppressive system, commerce is the free market.

    • @fredericgadoury6610
      @fredericgadoury6610 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      KAOS NATION
      Can you explain what is pure capitalism?
      You mean a market without regulation and without politics?
      Like when URSS switch to capitalism you know how that turn?
      Their worse economical crisis, mafia was everywhere and control the whole market.
      "Capitalism" started to work only when government started to implement regulations.
      And I like how you refer the early 1900’ saying it was its purest form of capitalism while ending up with its worst financial crisis ever. Kinda fail
      And don’t forget that it’s actually because of the two world war that USA (and all the other to this very day) is that much of a super power

  • @johnnyjustice
    @johnnyjustice 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Good that this addresses the specific flaws of capitalism we can focus on instead of engaging in outrageous utopian thinking which can easily make us feel good about ourselves.

    • @TeaParty1776
      @TeaParty1776 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The biggest flaw of capitalism is the need for a focused mind. With socialism and fascism, you can evade focusing and wait to be told what to do.

  • @samuelgriffin2876
    @samuelgriffin2876 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Love this series but I was kind of disappointed with no mentioning of Milton Friedman, especially when an advocate of capitalism was Bill Clinton instead of Friedman...

    • @Rellikan
      @Rellikan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, amazing uses a government official to represent Capitalism when Capitalism doesn't really need government.

  • @snaavs
    @snaavs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think this video misses an important point: people aren't upset that some have more than others.it's that banks have been allowed (particularly in the US) to run amok.

  • @Kaiwizz
    @Kaiwizz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Funny how I'm listening to a video, pointing out the flaws of capitalism on the internet in my smartphone through my wireless earbuds. I am reminded of the code "of course... But may be..."

  • @emilybradley7708
    @emilybradley7708 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is really helpful! Im writing about this for my dissertation, you have any text you could recommend that aligns with this research?

    • @cnrspiller3549
      @cnrspiller3549 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or contradicts?

    • @subhomondal6844
      @subhomondal6844 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow. I also need help for my term paper about How global capitalism is connected with progress of Television. Or how television is related with capitalism?

  • @boxertest
    @boxertest 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    LOVE THIS CHANNEL :-)

  • @thehumanchannel9004
    @thehumanchannel9004 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Eureka!! The most satisfying video I've watched in a long while

  • @uttkarshabaxi2201
    @uttkarshabaxi2201 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative!

  • @domingodeanda233
    @domingodeanda233 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was pretty damn good, thanks.

  • @baivabgupta270
    @baivabgupta270 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Keep up the good word educating . It's all about telling your part.

  • @awsomeguy001
    @awsomeguy001 8 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Jesus was not against capitalism! He was against the blasphemy against a place of worship

    • @bbrigman9382
      @bbrigman9382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Presuming to know Jesus? How do we know he wasn't against Exploitation and Extortion ... two tenets of unregulated Capitalism.

    • @AlessioMorello
      @AlessioMorello 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      DUDAH You really blame impoverished parents rather than the system? They have to put food on the table.

    • @omkhetz3798
      @omkhetz3798 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @DUDAH thank you!!! Someone said it. Also let's not forget how immoral the other option is. Socialism is theft. Theft was never advocated by jesus. Socialism is theft because it forcefully takes money or even private property from one person and gives it to someone who had not worked for it in the name of "equality". That's just theft, no other way of looking at it, it's theft and stealing is a sin.

    • @AlessioMorello
      @AlessioMorello 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@omkhetz3798 Alright guys, you really wanna go? Okay... 1) I grew up in the service economy. I've worked in Hollywood, I've seen the lifestyle of the .01%, the billionaire class. Below them, an invisible majority live in poverty. I can safely say that the USA is a third-world country, with a first-world aristocratic class. Hollywood and the media industry are the marketing campaign to hide these truths from the rest of society. 2) Yuppies do not have it "easy" when they spend their entire life in debt slavery, paying off loans, going bankrupt from medical emergencies. Only the wealthy have it easy in America. 3) @DUDAH You can only tell someone they "don't know economics" if you understand the fundamentals of capital, labor, use value, exchange value, surplus value, artificial scarcity, etc., better than others. Based on your comment, I'm doubtful of that, but maybe you can change my mind. 4) The "socialism is theft" claim just demonstrates an embarrassing lack of historical understanding. In 1797, Thomas Paine wrote "Agrarian Justice." Be careful... if you guys read it, your brains might explode when you realize that one of America's most influential founding fathers during the Revolutionary War was, by your standards, a "socialist."

    • @omkhetz3798
      @omkhetz3798 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AlessioMorello anecdotal opinion is invalid. First of all, the USA has better wages, better standard of living, better quality of healthcare, low prices for great products, most businesses, most amount of millionaires and the most innovation on earth. Your anecdotal evidence shows the incompetence of the liberal Californian government with its over regulation, high taxes and bad social programs. California is the most Socialist state in America except maybe for new York or Vermont. It shows how Socialism doesn't work. Compare California it the much more free market freedom loving texas, both have similar populations, similar climates, similar geography, similar latino-american culture, the one thing that is completely different is it's economic development. Texas has no state taxes, less regulation, less state run programmes, cheaper products, cheaper housing, Texas is more free market. You go to Texas and you see an abundance of things that would be considered a luxury in California. Things like 3 bedroom housing with a front yard and a garden with a swimming pool is common. That's the free market.
      The issue of wealth inequality isn't a bad thing.
      Let's say there are 10 people in a room and they all have $10. 1 of the 10 people decide to write a book and decide to sell it for $1.
      5 of the 10 people decide to buy the book. Now the author has 5 customers all willing to pay $1 for the book. the author now has $15, 5 people have $9, and 4 people have $10. No immorality was done but look, there's inequality. It's not an injustice.

  • @fckwatuthot
    @fckwatuthot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome video. that dikens quote tho, damn

  • @jamespoppitz2256
    @jamespoppitz2256 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well worth the time...evenhanded...good perspective.