ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 มี.ค. 2012
- With our population hitting 7 billion people, what does this mean for the health of our planet? Are we at risk of running out of resources? Join us for a new episode of SciShow where Hank talks about the issues of rising global population and what it means for our planet. Let's go!
Like SciShow on Facebook: / scishow
Follow SciShow on Twitter: / scishow
Sources:
Life Expectancy: www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?Data_...
Demographics: www.sciencemag.org/content/sup...
dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/201...
business.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11...
Environment: www.time.com/time/specials/pac...
ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2010...
Hunger: www.grida.no/publications/othe...
Various stuff: National Geo infographic: • 7 Billion, National Ge...
Image:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tho...
I kinda miss these older videos that were at a slower pace. I know it doesn't bring in the view numbers and fit audience retention rates, but it's a nice change if you want something a bit slower paced and more detailed.
Didn't expect you to be here you are like one of my favs on youtube and i'm just doing homework
For me it's already fast paced.
We just broke 8 billion. 1 billion people people in 10 years.
2 billion when my parents were in school.
4 billion when I was in school.
8 billion while my children are in school.
I expect 16 billion when my future grandchildren go to school.
Or perhaps not. Our planet doesn't have that much carrying capacity. One way or another, some of those billions will just have to go.
about 1 billion in 11 years:
5 bn in 1987
6 bn in 1999 (+1bn in 12 years)
7 bn in 2011 (+1bn in 12 years)
8 bn in 2022 (+1bn in 11 years)
The increase is slowing down now also in absolute numbers, and it's estimated that the next billion - the 9 bn mark - will be reached in about 13 or 14 years.
@@pwnmeisterageNo, the world population will not reach 16 billion. With the current development of birthrates, population estimations usually predict the world population to peak between 10 and 11 billion, in about 50 or 60 years from now. It's now rather not expected to go beyond 11 billion, and very unlikely to exceed 12 or 13 bn.
@@tobyk.4911 I've seen the graphs, the published results of studies, etc.
They all suggest/predic a population cap around 11 or 12 billion before a steady decline.
I think that's unrealistically optimistic. I've seen world population double every generation, I think it's foolish to assume it won't double again in the next generation.
@@pwnmeisterage apparently you are assuming that the world population is increasing exponentially - but that's not the reality. We are not in the 1960s or 1970s anymore. The growth rate has dropped considerably in the last 50 years.
Especially, in the last 30 years there was not an exponential increase, but rather a linear increase (by about 80 million per year). Btw., If this increase would continue at this rate, this would of course mean that the population would double / grow from 8 to 16 bn in a hundred years (much more than one generation).
When he said “ 7 billion people” I thought
“ damn this videos old”.
Yup, here in Nov 2019, when we're at 7.7 billion.
This is probably a subject that should get periodically mentioned. You know, because it's the root cause or a major factor in extinctions, climate change, and political extremism.
@@MacHippy-qk4pr ...What. How are American politics a major factor of possible extinctions or climate change?
@@IceNixie0102 here in July 21 2020 . . . 7,799,660,007 soon to be 7.8 billion
7 billion people seems like not that long ago. Almost just yesterday. And already the world has shot up to a whopping 7.8 billion people? But I am very pro-life, and I very much agree with the huge numbers of people who have objections to all methods of birth control. I very much agree with people having naturally-large families, so that more people in the world can become alive. I very much agree with the human life becoming more and more and with not trying to somehow "control" the human fertility. Let the world population naturally push up and up. More and more people would be glad to live.
It was officially just 7 billion people, in the year 2011.
Using this as inspiration for an essay and realized that this video is so old that almost every source linked does not exist anymore. Congrats on staying relevant Hank. Keep up the good work.
and all these new people are 4 yo already...damn
Wow, that's something to think...
Not all. Some of them died :)
+Draoxx Many of them, even.
note that that number represents the NET change of population. So the newborn babies MINUS all the people that die.
well im guessing most of them died already (hopefully)
Japan is me. "Why aren't you having any babies?" "I don't know. I don't feel like it."
All of those babies just turned six! 😄
rachel b aww, happy birthday
Well actually statistically speaking 3% of them did not make it to 6.
Charlie C that’s deep... life is precious but.... it’s terrible that child mortality is so high in some countries like, those kids could’ve been somebody one day!! We are all unique, complex minded creatures with emotions and different personalities. It’s heart breaking but.. we cant do anything about it. Sadly all those kids are just a addition to a statistic now. They are decayed and gone forever; they can’t and never will live again. I can’t go on any further m8. I was just venting, I hope you got my point. It truly is extremely heart breaking when put into deep thought.
beastmaztr 02
It's not deep, it's statistics
We got more land then can imagine. Is not need of depopulation. But all we want is to live in the big citys. If you cross Texas with 70 miles per h takes 11 hours. We got lend everywhere more then neigh.The best workers on Our land to depopulate are C.P.S and A.C..S they make you not to have children anymore.
Imagine having 15 babies, expecting 5 of them to live, then the industrial revolution happens.
Lmao 12 and they all lived.
If you had 15 babies and the industrial revolution happens say goodbye to them inside those factories boy, those children will not be living. You know initially the industrial revolution lowered living standards by a lot, right?
A large help would be to move our intercity roads under the surface, allowing large swathes of land to return to nature.
Do you have any idea how much that would cost?
Free-energy self-drive flying cars, would be a lot more practical. At least most people would actually much enjoy that.
The idea of getting rid of streets and roads would be to clear more land to make way for the rising human population. Think of the that space for building lots more houses. We won't need roads anymore, when cars take off vertically and fly to anywhere that you want. Hasn't anybody seen The Jetsons cartoon, with all of those flying cars?
+Yosef MacGruber you are right. The price would be high, but the savings in energy when we can evacuate the air...
Will it cost anymore than the global increase in climate controlled systems and water scarcity solutions due to global warming.
I'm leaning on the side of letting more renaturalization.
Brotherhood of Steel
Global warming has been debunked. The stupid theory would die quicker than the apparently-embarrassingly-wrong ozone depletion hole theory got swept under the rug, if it wasn't for the liberal socialist/communist wealth redistributing issue that really underlies it.
Just like a mother's belly "great with child" just needs to bulge, it would be far better and easier and more natural, to let the planet naturally or proudly "bulge with people" than it would be to scheme and conspire as to how to supposedly control our rising numbers. People are supposedly highly intelligent, and can and should be expected to *adapt*.
Yosef MacGruber Global warming hasn't been debunked. The ozone hole was due to CFC's which were banned by the Kyoto and Montreal protocols.
I'm not saying it's the end of Earth.
Humans will adapt and survive; There is no reason we can't.
However,
Climate change is happening.
This is the 13th consecutive hottest month on record.
For Clarity, *That means breaking the avg. global temperature record for every single month has been broken 13 times in a row.
From 1880-2015
14 of the last 15 years are all record breakers.
Meaning *14/15* years have been the hottest in over 135 years.
The statistical odds of that happening on a global scale is statistically impossible.
This isn't even including the runaway effect of increased water vapor in the air, which is the most effective greenhouse gas.
Not to mention geological records showing strong correlative data between carbon parts per million and temperature rises.
Carbon dioxide has hovered around 270 ppm over 1000 years, it's also now at 400ppm.
This is beyond reasonable proof.
9:29 and that's exactly why i want a hell of a lot fewer births. seriously people, how about instead of jumping through hoops have your own baby, how about you grow a heart and a brain and adopt instead to take care of the people who are already here
Adopting is tough sometimes.
Matthew Riddell because of qualifications? if so, figures.....
+opsonicfan358
Many people in the developed world are doing that, particularly vegans. It's the people living in places like Africa who have no education or access to birth control that are causing population levels to sky rocket.
One of my classmates have 8 siblings despite both parents having bachelors degrees. Their religion is why she has 8 siblings
Yuenning Che ... how does that work? what, do they not believe in birth control, or was it on purpose all/most of those times?
I know this is an older video from you guys, but I just found your channel, and I absolutely love it!!! This is an awesome and informative channel, and I'm addicted!! Thanks guys...and now I'm off to binge all the vids and become a Sci-fiend!!! Lol!!
Hank green is the best host of scishow
More hank green
Thats like saying water is wet, we know
@@mcgrath131 water isn't wet and can't get wet unless you put oil on it
Although equal, free/cheap food distribution sounds pretty neat, it actually isn't. For the past 50 years the US and the EU exported food so cheaply that some really poor countries, especially in Africa, didn't see the need to develop their own agriculture any further. Small farmers could not compete with the cheap imports, went out of business and became even poorer. End of story when prices for grains increased dramatically in 2007/08 a lot of people in developing countries couldn't afford bread anymore, because they were so dependent on the world market price. In developed countries we are capable to produce food mountains but rather than shipping them, we should give knowledge and technology to the people in need.
*****
The agricultural market is not free at all. It's heavly subsidised, otherwise farmers in Europe couldn't make a living.
basically give the job to the guy and not the moneyp
Cheap stuff is thanks to low wages in the 3rd world, you can't make everybody rich. Starving people are paying your high standard of living, so Malthus was correct.
So it is the fault of China and soon India?! All of those no-longer poor people want to have cars and eat meat and refrigerate their food and heat/air-condition their houses... Speaking as a person in China, we have all those nice things now.
@@comicsans3845 Lol as if it wasn't the case for most of human history.
4:30 lol what happened to your hair? You look like Jimmy Neutron in that part haah
I wanna know too
lol how did I not notice that!?
Ha omg its so weird
Gotta blast!
peculiargoldfish lel
8 years later and we're closing in on 8 billion already. 7.84 billion human beings. Absolutely incredible.
Actually quite beautiful that even more billions of people can live. Beautiful blossoming of human life. I have long advocated that people have larger families, because more and more people would be glad to live. Also, very many people really do not like birth control, and are open to having possibly-larger families.
As a pro-lifer, I very much welcome the burgeoning world population size to climb naturally and freely. Let people increasingly fill the world. Build more cities. Put people wherever that we can. Encourage massive and persistent baby booms. Improve population accommodation, but encourage the people to multiply more naturally and rapidly. Marry younger and welcome precious babies to freely push out, shunning any means of anti-life anti-family birth control.
I see the natural expansion of human life, as something beautiful to welcome and celebrate.
Which of us is not important? Because we humans are created in God's image, that makes all humans valuable and sacred also.
@@yosefmacgruber1920 it's the cause for humanity's own downfall, societal, and resources then economy. When a population goes unchecked then their own species will eventually wipe themselves out.
We have now over 8 billion people as of this reply
@@m_rissspeedruns1231 WE NEED 6 BILLION HUMAN GENOCIDE
@@lilphilosophy481 It's estimated that the earth's carrying capacity for the human species lies between 11 and 13 billion people. That's assuming, of course, that we live sustainably and in harmony with nature, or at least not against nature.
I remember seeing this video when it first came out back when. I'm glad scishow is still around. Do I sometimes miss the older, a little more looser format, yes. But I recognize longevity has a price, and I'm pretty pleased to start pointing my nephews who are now in the double digits at your content.
Dear scishow, thank you for all of your insightful videos. I like learning with you guys
Frank Coles Actually, the problem is not overpopulation, but over-consumption of a few hundred million people.
And the reason is: the monetary-capitalist system is inherently unsustainable, disregarding public-, and ecological health, with resource-, and waste management. Instead of solving problems, it thrives on maintaining them, treating only their symptoms (for profit). Ultimately, our agriculture and transportation is based on Oil, but as Peak Oil will occur in 5-10 years, our whole civilization will collapse with it. Thus, we need to change to a sustainable economy _now_ (e.g. NL/RBE).
Also, 1/3 of food in developed countries is never even eaten....sooo yeah.
So what? Even if we eat 100% of the food, it doesn't magically help starvation in poor countries.
Floris I think the point is that we GIVE our leftovers to starving people.
Usually left over food in restaurants and stores like walmart or Sam's, it is placed in a special trash and tranported to farms to feed our future food
Actually, it is eaten, but not by humans.
It is eaten by domesticated animals. Which in turn is eaten by us. So that's why we say that a lot of our food is wasted.
Hank talks about it in the video.
We need to start wasting less food then. We all need to think before buying, especially fresh food, to make sure you can actually eat it before it gets spoiled. And also the date label is something you should ignore if the food seems otherwise fine. The store should also try to manage the food better, and not throw away perfectly edible food for being one day past the date
Watching for the first time in 2019, didnt know Hank was always this awesome!
4:28 hair on point. ;)
maybe we should stop making babies eh ?
we have it the 3rd world countries that keep on having when they don't have money.
Mrbrain bob Hi, I live in what you call a 3rd world country and fuck you :) . Stop wasting the water of my unborn kids and we'll do it fine.
I don't want kids either way, but my sister does...so stop wasting the water of my unborn nephew.
***** lOOOLL You made my day!!!
***** Are you a troll? Because I don't think people from third world countries are able to go online and argue on TH-cam.
Mrbrain bob think again, moron. Oh...and we can also speak english as a second language.
Rich people need to have more kids, poor people need to have less.
so fucking true
+Cerebral Amount of children born should not be decided by the parents wealth.
+Revazide Yeah it shouldn't it should be decided if the parents can even take care of the kids.
+helo joeywala Wealth does not determine whether or not a parent can care for a child but that is another subject. We are talking about the species eliminating issue of over population. Educated parents tend (I said tend) to have children in a sustainable way. Education is the thing that can solve this problem. If we don't solve it, natural processes will solve it for us. We will be driven into extinction.
+Adrian White -- You are a perfectly indoctrinated sheeple. The perfect parrot. And thinks for itself just about as much as a parrot.
Good, well put, extraordinarily well put!
Hey SciShow, first time writing, but I've been watching a lot, and love what you guys are doing. I would like to see a video on the science/history of 'Lyricism' (as a technology, art, science, anything) I think that would be REALLY interesting and I think you guys would do great. Suggestion- Look into Aesop Rock 😊
1361 people were born while you were watching this just from the time he started the count... 1543 if you count the whole video. It's kind of staggering...
Why is the beauty of human life, madness, in your confused view?
*****
Why do you poo-poo the sacredness and beauty of human life? Isn't that really dishonest?
why are you being a pain in the ass? Its really dishonest.
Still 750+ died so not that bad
Yosef MacGruber if we keep reproducing as much as we do we'll need 2 earths to actually keep everybody healthy and well fed ... but we're stuck with 1 ... we need to stop because we don't have enough space anymore ...
The pope shouldn't tell the Catholics especially those in Africa that condoms will bring them to hell.
woni bio I am offended, you are trying to kill Asians? That’s racist too.
And killing either might have a negative effect
There is a babe in your picture
Lane Moje 🤔🤔🤔
pope is an idiot,
Totally agree. We need birth control at this point, both to save society as a whole in the long run, and for each individual to not have their lives ruined by a child they werent ready for, or the children themselves to suffer neglect from unprepared parents or living in an orphanage. Those who opposes birth control is a cause of major problems in this world, and without even having a good reason
Checking in 7 years after this video went up.
Hank, it's Andy. it's 2019. Tell everyone back in 2012 to kill each other. It's the only way. The Mayan thing doesn't pan out, and it turns out there are no brakes on this train.
There are no brakes on the insane train Andy, the only stop is slightly down the tracks where that neglected section is going to buckle under our weight.
We'll derail with a massive explosion, fire and screams, at least it'll all be over quickly.
@@adolin1338 Press "X" to jump to horse
thanks andy. you're the man
@@bdogman *tips hat*
Or just let the world population naturally and freely increase. It will work out.
I have never watered my lawn. I did, a couple times during a severe drought, water a couple of old trees. But if the grass can't survive without me, then it doesn't deserve to. It's grass.
Education is the damn answer. If you want to be rich and live a fancy life, you probably can't have children.
education is the correct answer, but also the difficult answer. education paves the way for the future, but doesnt do anything now, meaning knowing how to read and write doesnt stop you from getting hungry.
So all the stupid people continue having babies and all the smart people die off? Sounds like a great idea.
Just get a wife and let her take care of your children, that's the solution
You do realize that the most successful of the species having the most children is how we even evolved to be as smart as we are right? Do you really want us to get dumber now?
"We" aren't smarter people. Some people are smart for sure, but that vast majority of people alive now are not. I have one child and my son is always at the top of his class in every subject. He has attended schools with kids from various socioeconomic backgrounds and almost without exception kids from larger families are less intelligent, if not nearly mentally handicapped to great extent. There is also research indicating that older siblings from larger families regress to lower vocabulary proficiency due to parent's use of language with the younger children-think how people talk to babies and that is what older children emulate.
Actually, I did the math. Let's say we count to a billion to begin with. It would take 1 billion seconds to count to 1 billion, if you counted one number per second. But, we're counting 2.5 numbers per second, but forget about that for a minute.
Let's stay with the 1 billion seconds. Divide 1 billion by 60, and you'll get the amount of minutes it would take. Divide that number by 60, and you'll get the amount of hours it would take. Divide that number by 24, and you'll get the number of days it would take. Dividing that by 365.25, and you'll get the number of years it would take. To count to 1 billion, at a rate of one number per second, it would take about 31.68 years.
Let's divide that number by 2.5, to get the amount of years it would take to count to a billion, at a rate of 2.5 numbers per second. The number would be about 12.67 years.
So, we need to find out how much time it would take to count to 6 billion (the number of people born withing 200 years after the first billion people, [3:57] in the video). We can just multiply the 12.67 years by 6 to get our answer. The amount of time it would take to count to 6 billion, at a rate of 2.5 numbers per second (which is quite unrealistic, as no one can say some of the bigger numbers out there 2.5 times a second), it would take a grand total of 76.05 years.
That means (as far as I can tell), that for every 76.05 years from this point, the Earth's population of humans will grow by about 6 billion people, every 76.05 years (if the rate of babies being born stays the same).
CelestialFrost so basically we need to implement a 2-child policy (or at a minimum, a 3-child policy) like yesterday.
+CelestialFrost Jesus christ you're right... that's scary
+CelestialFrost It will actually increase dramatically as progressivism increases and medical science/mass production become more advanced through technology.
+CelestialFrost I'm sure that you are well aware that it will not grow constantly at this rate and that it's going to grow exponentially from this point on
+Fred Laff immortality by 2040..
I have been aware of this since i was a toddler and it has been scaring me since then as well.
Love the show. Hank looks a little drunk though, right?
(FYI, read his book. It's on Amazon. So good)
There's babies being pushed out as we speak.
Cool! People should have even more babies. More and more people would be glad to live.
Yosef MacGruber NO. Don't you see? THERE'S 7 BILLION PEOPLE IN THE EARTH. I think that's ENOUGH for now. 4 BABIES ARE BORN PER SECOND, IS THAT ENOUGH!?!?
Yosef MacGruber There's kids waiting to be adopted, too, and saying "birth control is awkward, unnatural, and 'crap'" just makes population control look bad when it is not.
*****
Ignorance is not an argument. Population control is tyranny, and there are numerous books that tell you how bad it is, yet people choose to be uneducated and do not read such books? I have many such books.
Do you want book titles and authors? Or if you simply do a simple search on YT, something like "nwo depopulation" or "population control", you can find ample examples of how bad government violence, depopulation schemes, and population control is. What if your parents had 3 children, and some cruel government mandated only 2? Do you think a stupid wicked government will say "pretty please"? Or will they say, "Well you must be special, so you can have 3"? Do I have to explain how this is a setup for government violence and needless conflict?
There are no practical nor moral ways by which to control human population growth. Most normal people are *against* population control of humans. The reasons to me, seem rather obvious.
And regardless, birth control is awkward, unnatural, and crap.
Yosef MacGruber That is a big lie and you should feel bad. More and more people are switching to population control the momment as we speak, 4 babies are born per second, and that is enough. Way too many people are in the planet. WE DON'T NEED MORE PEOPLE.
God mentions abortion and how it is allowed. Women only paid 10 shekels for an abortion, bitter water would abort a fetus if it was concieved from adultery (rape) and God told some men to rip open the pregnant women for some reason in egypt. You were lying about reading the bible, and you would know this if you read it right.
So basically your calling God unnatural. Hyprocrite.
Using the word "crap" and "awkward" makes you look like a 11 year old playing minecraft while getting slain by a zombie.
we are like bacteria in a covered Petri dish multiplying exponentially and were starting to crawl up the walls.
Super bacteria, run Mars, RUN!!
Maybe we will "event" it by mistake...
If a bacterium in a jar doubles every minute but is very small and it's taken a year to fill the jar to half-full, how long does it take to fill the jar completely?
1 minute. A minute before that it was 1/4 full. A minute before that 1/8 full.
It's 2018 now , with 7.6 billion growing at over 1% per year. That doubles in less than 70 years. This will take as many resources as were consumed during all previous doubling periods if rates of consumption stay the same. ( See Al Bartlett's presentations.) Population tripled since 1950 by the by.
So allow and encourage human populations to double and redouble again. More and more people would be glad to live.
The world is not some tiny jar. Bad metaphor.
The bacteria all suddenly die once they use up all the resources in the dish. Just sayin...
Super love your channel and videos! Learning new things from you. Btw, i love you!!! You're cute and smart!!! Keep talking and sharing the knowledge to the world! ^_^ knowledge is power.
It's amazing seeing the difference in video quality between SciShow Today (2017) and SciShow 2012
Big difference between "Comfortable population" and "Uncomfortable Population"
Nah man I think it would be better to starve them. You don't want nuclear fallout.
@@lukidwiputra4644 No 'Fission is needed. Ask a german: HCN works.
Starve who the US or Europeans?
Good job Japan.
I'm part from there and it looks like they're heading for a crisis. Seriously, you drive into the countryside, you just pass miles and miles of abandoned housing. They may even go extinct in 100 years. So no, not good job Japan
Nick Lindsey Have you seen the population of that country, combined with how relatively small they are? One hundred and thirty million people in a space of 375, 000 square kilometres. When you compare them to how densely populated countries such as Australia and the USA are, it is ridiculous. Norway, a beautiful country, known for having the highest standed of living, is larger than Japan and with a much smaller population (not even six million). Japan is NOT EVEN CLOSE TO BEING UNDER POPULATED. We can only support another couple of billion people. Life could become more uncomfortable and important resources could start to run out faster, with more
people using them. That could start wars and cause death. Overpopulation is a serious problem ( and please forgive me if this sounds a bit silly or anything, I was typing this late at night).
Nick Lindsey And I do see your point about abandoned buildings in Japan.👺
+Kyle Reese yes, but they found solutions to their population (they've built farms in skyscrapers and stuff like that) but their aging population will crash the country sometime in the future. And it looks like it'll happen to China too. Only Japan is already developed but China isn't
+Nick Lindsey I see your point.
Is this the Drunk SciShow? My dude seems a bit tipsy. I Like it
I think I know a way to solve this problem....infinity stones
It would be a temporal solution, just until we reach the same point again and again.
Erase those who are Not Worthy.
Thanks aldready tried it
Let wars happen.....😁
@@OpinioNaty
If the human population needs to be so big, then let it be and enjoy being so big.
What frightens me as much as the ramifications of the population explosion are the horrific solutions to the problem suggested by the average TH-cam commenter.
So, what's your solution?
krazymindreader war
Well, that's the thing: I don't necessarily have one, short of extrasolar colonization, which is off the table unless we somehow develop faster-than-light travel capabilities. But I'm hoping for something better than forcibly sterilizing or outright murdering entire third world populations.
Devin Parker that is my solution to all human problems!! but im partial love scifi haha
krazymindreader
Education. The populations with the most comprehensive education almost invariably have the lowest birth rate. Effective, cost free, and shame free access to contraception would be another step in the right direction.
I wish Scishow was still like this, absolutely love his presentation
I actually laughed multiple times throughout the video
Idk y, but hank is my fav scishow
Thank you for your greeting!
Cant grow drinking water... Cant grow oil (which we use in tons of stuff, not just fuel)... cant grow almost all natural resources... eventually there will be nothing of certain things...
willy wonka and then earth will finally be happy again after it got rid of us 😂
Changing our landscaping norms would put a big dent in the fresh water problem. Also finding ways to deal with industrial overuse of water. Oil we actually don't need. Green energy tech is there. We just have to use it. Overall, resource allocation is the real problem.
If stopped trapping fresh water it would help a lot. Do some simple calculations concerning water that we have removed from the environment. Literally trillions of gallons of fresh water are trapped in things like: bottles of water, water heaters (40-50gls each times the number of homes and buildings on earth, pipes in the ground, pools, pipes in houses and buildings, radiators in vehicles, bottles of beer soda wine etc. And of course the number of animals, including humans, that are 70% water has risen exponentially. If the average person weighs say 150 lbs, water is 8lbs/gal, there is 18.5 gals per human times 7 billion that’s about 125 billion gals. Do the same math for cattle, pigs, chickens, dogs, cats etc and you have a lot of water. Combine that with all the water trapped in stuff I listed first and you come up with trillions of gals of fresh water not in the environment any longer. Might be the cause of droughts and other climate changes.
Drinking water cant be grown, but it can be recycled, which it actually has for millions of years, its not something we run out of. We could run out of oil, but we already seem to be moving in the direction of more and more electricity and other forms of fuel and less oil. So it shouldnt be a huge problem. But we may face other problems with overpopulation
You can also make sea water drinkable via desalination. Countries such as Israel and Antiqua and Barbuda already get the majority of their drinking water this way
Actually, the reason for the population explosions in Subsaharan Africa is primarily due to lack of birth control availability, not that their conditions are improving. The #1 killer in that part of the world is not starvation, it's Malaria, a disease that still has not been dealt with effectively in that part of the world.
Who do you think is responsible for the birth control availability problem in Africa? The Catholic Church. The Pope unambiguously tells people not to use condoms because they're evil. Hitch was right - religion poisons everything.
***** I disagree. They listen because they are told if they use condoms they will go to Hell. Which is of course a lie. If religion didn't exist I doubt anyone will be telling them condoms are evil.
subnetme The Catholic Church does not have a monopoly on religion.
Read a book or something.
subnetme Before religion, there was no birth control, no science, no civilization.
Godless people just beat each other with clubs and slept in caves and straw huts.
Religionless people weren't the most sophisticated bunch, lol.
subnetme why did you have to bring religion in here? god, so now it is their fault that the governments of underdeveloped countries are lazy and do not want to spend money on education and birth control because they are saving it for their Bahama's houses? What does religion have to do with that?
Wow, he is so much better in the old ones,
Barely over 10 years later, we just hit 8 billion... insane
We need more people like Hank Green.
It sounds like there are built in mechanisms that balance things out.
We start making disease less of an issue and food less of an issue and population goes up. We start wanting more stuff per person and population slows down.
We won't get to that point, we're already at that the point where the only thing that can correct us downwards is a mass death event.
Think 1/4+ of the worlds population. I hope not to see that in my lifetime, but the trends strongly suggest it.
Jake Heuft We won't get to what point exactly?
Also where exactly are you getting your numbers? I am curious as to the math/science behind them.
Look at a graph of human population growth.
And then look at these.
www.google.com/search?q=population+explosion&espv=2&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=QjeNU-6ePKmhsQTb4YD4Cg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1680&bih=935#q=population+explosion+graph&tbm=isch
Know what comes next?
www.google.com/search?q=population+explosion&espv=2&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=QjeNU-6ePKmhsQTb4YD4Cg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1680&bih=935#q=population+crash+graph&tbm=isch
It makes good sense, but so did the 1 billion mark. They just didn't compensate for technology that was not invented yet. We also have the same handicap.
_"We won't get to that point"_
Again what point will we not get to, I am curious
I thought the graphs I posted were pretty clear....
The only way forward is for a population collapse...
It again may not happen in our lifetimes, but unless technology advances fast enough the only future for the human race is a catastrophic collapse of it.
There are no large scale living systems anywhere that can cope with an exponential population increase and remain stable.
Freshwater is the limiting factor. Lack of freshwater leads to poor sanitation and epidemics.
Awesome presentation !
soap has been around for thhousands of years in different plants like soaproot or yucca are a couple that come to mind
for people who are talking about killing....STOP BEING RIDICULOUS.
All we need is to cut down our breeding rate. 2-child policy is a nice way to start.
That moment when some1 has triplets.
Action4 Jackson are you nitpicking because you disagree with overpopulation?
Because of course i'm not going to tell someone "omg why did you have triplets??"
Come on dude...seriously??
There's a BIG difference between someone having triplets versus a person who is too stupid or too lazy or too selfish (or a combination of all 3) to put on a condom and end up producing tons of kids.
Sean Armstrong sorry..... Dude I was just joking.
+Sean Armstrong Legislating that could easily prove disastrous. Voluntary reductions via the culture (e.g. Japan) would probably work better. It is possible for people to simply not want sex, contrary to what culture keeps telling us.
Part of it too is the environment. Sex has a ton of psychological effects, not all of which are known. Japan is most certainly an overpopulated country, and interest in sex has been reported to be low.
Japan has a more or less stable government, China has a long history of human rights violations, and India is a very poor country. So, possibly a combination of stable livelihoods with overpopulation in the immediate vicinity leads to a natural tendency to not want kids. If this is the case, all we need to do is provide human rights and a stable environment and wait.
In any case, the population will limit itself one way or another.
101jir The problem is WHEN will the population limit itself? Japan only starts to limit when cities like Tokyo become UNBEARABLY CROWDED.
If you ever travel in Tokyo or other major big cities in Japan, you will know that it is so uncomfortable that I don't see how anybody can stay there for a living.
So to answer your question: yes, most populations will indeed limit itself, but at what cost? Do we all wait until all our cities become as crowded and as uncomfortable as Tokyo before we realize "hey...maybe we should stop having so many kids..."??
Or can we perhaps act smart and ensure we DON'T reach to that level of critical mass, and everybody walks away with a happier life?
"Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not enough to satisfy every man's greed" - Gandhi
Mathus is a ray of bloody sunshine, I bet he was a blast at parties.
I hate it when Christians say "I've been blessed." How dare you think the "creator" of the whole universe chose you to have a good life while millions of people suffer from war, famine, poverty, sickness, etc. No, you haven't been blessed by you imaginary friend. You are lucky!
Don't hate on Christianity friend. It's reasonable for a person who believes in a god of some sort believes that luck alone wouldn't be enough to end up in a relatively good place to live in comparison to other parts of the world
oh yes, bash the Christians, who have nothing to do with this video whatsoever.
Well I am not Christian and nor Atheist I am a Muslim if you are curious. But point is not that. First things first because you are a non religious guy (looks like an atheist) stop blaming an average Christian. It is not out of just luck. There are hundreds of millions of Christians in only Nigeria who starve to death and many many more in other parts of Africa. And it maybe true that Europeans are rich that is not because of their religion but because of the industrial revolution. And also there are Hindus, Buddhists and Muslims who are rich too. Just go and verify what you know before speaking.
When someone says that they mean they are lucky to have such a good life and are grateful(most of the time).
Stay blessed.
food is eating all the food lol
I love the old background so much more.
great video thx!
We don't need to eliminate people, we need to eliminate over-consumption. How many perfectly good mobile phones and computers were thrown away last year, just because they were 2 years old? That's just an example. And with the rise of the middle class in India and China, it's only getting worse. Far far worse.
If we do that with the Electrionics then the companys that make those items, they will lose money... You have to find another way to balance it out so they wont lose money but we can still keep the stuff for longer periods of time.
Viktor Johansson Well the companys do not really need more money. The creators have billions of dollars and could go for a vacation for the rest of their life.
Well, lets look at it from this perspective, whatever country you live in, that country wants you to buy products, because they tax those products and if your TV does not brake as fast, you won't buy a new one? Right? And then the economy of where ever you come from will be in a bad state. TL;DR Whatever country you come from they want you to buy more products because they tax products, if stuff doesn't brake as fast, we wont buy as much.
Viktor Johansson so to overcome that problem, you simply raise the income tax, or whatever really
Lindholmer5k Raising taxes forces people below the poverty line. Falling sales and rising prices also forces people below the poverty line. More people below the poverty line means more people on welfare. More people on welfare means more government debt. Government debt + Falling sales + rising taxes = Austerity, that funny economic practice Europe has been using under the assumption that by reducing business now they can regrow in the long term. Instead unemployment and rioting have skyrocketed, scores of educated uni students have emigrated causing a brain drain effect, governments have collapsed, right wing nationalist parties have grown immensely and in general you don't want to live in any of the PIIGS nations.
Holy fuck the comment on this video are so long, im jealous
+Christian Ludvigsen Yeah, what the fuck is up with that.
+Jared Vass Doooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooont worry guys, its not about the length :)
+Christian Lugvigsen Fucking lol
The science of seaman and egg joining.
We keep concentrating on food and resource shortages. The thing that will kill us is our waste. There have been lackluster pushes for waste reduction, but waste is such a taboo subject people tend to ignore it.
SciShow should do a show on the explosion of waste. How our industrial revolution striving to create new and better means for consumption left out dealing with the waste that created. Kind of like this episode, but re-script to look at the waste each person produces (and a time cloct as well), not just in impoverished but also industrialized countries. Maybe even start with how before industrialization the population was small enough that nature could deal with our waste (especially the biodegradable lot of it) but now, we have so much processed material that there is no natural solution.
I remember a science experiment form school. We put a bacteria in a Petri dish and charted growth. It grew to consume most of the food, until it started dying from the overabundance of the waste produced from its growth.
A SciShow on the waste of a modern technological society could be very enlightening.
Love your hair at 4:32
Damned near 1500 people born in the last 10 minutes? Damn I need to get laid.
Made my day :)
Ralegade Bro they are babies
Everybody relax, the truth is population growth is slowing down and most nations are not even keeping up with the death rate. We produce more then enough food for everyone, in fact our Government pays farmers not to plant or to just ploy the fields over. People stave in Africa due to high population density in places food will not grow. Africa will either fix that problem for itself or starvation will fix it for them in a natural way. People are hungry in America due to the economics of the haves and have not's. Great thing is you can work your way out of poverty in America with very little trouble. I personally was jobless and homeless for years in my youth and although often hungry and cold never came close to starvation. Everything is going to be ok. Want to worry about something ? Try worrying about humans nuking themselves out of existence. Short of that we will be just fine.
If the farmers were left to overfarm they would make another dustbowl.
williamwzl
Not necessarily. Tilled yet unplanted, ungrassed fields caused the first one.
If you are only talking about relatively advanced countries.
HenryDavidT Pollution is a different subject from over population, and made no sense to post to this tread. However I agree pollution of our seas or any other resource for that matter is a far greater threat then over population. Human life is short so death due to mankinds' folly is as good a death as any other. Yes it is terrible that man destroys but something was going to kill you sooner or later, dead sea or not. I guess my overall point is stress less, no one gets out of this life alive. Try your best not to pollute and be good to your fellow man, but don't get to up tight, enjoy life while you can. Be part of the solutions and not the problem but in the end know your not even going to live long enough to see things get truly bad so relax.
Oh and here's some food for thought. The computer you posted your message to is made in a factory that dumps it's waste so that it ends up polluting the seas so act now get rid of your cars, house, electronics, plastics, cell phone, etc etc all of which lead to the pollution you spoke of. Let me help you brother with the log in your eye.
Boy do you sound like a corporate mouthpiece.
I love Hank
this blew my frickin mind
this is depressing. 1360 people born in 10 minutes
How is that depressing?
@@AdamSmith-gs2dv
Why would they die quickly? Do the parents not love their children so they do not feed them? Of course they feed them. Africa's population is growing quite a lot. Africans refuse to use condoms, because they want more children and they want to get pregnant. Human populations are supposed to grow. It is very good that human populations are naturally growing, as it means more people alive to experience and enjoy life.
Ankit it was more depressing sometime between 10 and 100 years ago depending on your age
@@luciferangelica
Why should the natural growth of humanity, be "depressing"? Also, the amount or level of depressing, how would that be a measure of growth rate?
This is so depressing..tht u were born...the world wud have 1 less person..
I want Vsauce and Hank as my science teachers!
they are!
They're already two of my science teachers! Haha
It's 2021 and this must be the most depressed and depressing Hank appearance to date.
The Ping Pong Ball part was enough for me to smash the like button!
the argument didnt even attempt to tackle the whole variation aspect, everyones issue with overpopulation is that we're killing off a ton of wildife by displacing them, the video mentions it but doesn't give a soluation at all
We need to keep multiplying as more and more people would be glad to live. Put people into more places. There are places all around to put more people.
Yosef MacGruber yea but one of the major fighting points of pop reg supporters is that we're killing off other species, we are in fact encrouching on their habitats as we expand our cities and suburbs into, which is why people in florida end up with gators in their pools and people in CA wake up to a coyote outside of their front door, of course theres more than enough room for us on the planet, but we're fuckin up the biosystem
PB42189
And how does that concern, in any way justify population regulation? How many animals vote or pay taxes? Shouldn't our elected representatives, represent the humans who put them into office? If there is supposedly less room for wildlife, that still does not mean that babies nor parents are in any way to blame. And obviously, much of the reason we are needing to expand, is that there is just getting to be so many of us. That doesn't mean that that we shouldn't multiply, nor that we are supposedly "too many", but rather, population is just huge, and that is the way that it is. Our ancestors viewed population, as population is what it is. They would be shocked at the bizarre idea of somehow "controlling" rising human numbers, as even family size was thought *uncontrollable*.
Also, you are wrong to call land "their" land in referring to animals. Animals can not legally "own" land. When we cut down trees to build more houses, the squirrels and birds just go elsewhere. And besides, those small animals seem to coexist well with humans, as they live in our backyards. They would multiply if they could. Many animals have short life span compared to people. If a person gets a pet dog, they have to give some thought as to "replacing" that dog, painful as it may be, as we know that we likely will greatly outlive the dog. The dog will get old and die, while we are still young. Animals do not go around thinking about high-level abstract stuff like, "The human population is just getting so amazingly big." Rather, if animals can not find territory, they just do not reproduce. They would still have that problem, if humans did not exist at all. Most animals do not get to reproduce, at all. Aren't you glad that you are not an animal?
The encroachment of gators and coyotes, is *not* caused by humans just becoming increasingly just everywhere, nor because wild animals can not find any space. Wild animals would multiply and multiply until every wild place is filled with them. So how do you blame humans, for taking away a little bit of space? No, I think why we hear occasionally of some wild bear or something, wandering around the city, is for basically 2 possible reasons.
• Stupid idiots were feeding bears, and the bears become confused and associate people with food. Also, it is a huge no-no to feed gators. It turns them into dangerous pests and they end up getting shot. We also should not feed wild animals, because it a natural signal to them to multiply more so, and then they are unable to adapt when winter comes, and so they die needlessly. (Humans are highly adaptable, and human life is sacred, thus we should ever feed humans.)
• I also have a theory, that human population is now just so huge, that the human scent is increasingly filling the entire atmosphere. The scent of humans wafts in from every direction, and animals of which much of their world is scent, get confused and can not find the direction to get away from the human scent. If they go in the direction of leaving the city, the animal smells human scent from the other surrounding cities, or that from the entire biosphere. Having fewer children, does nothing to address this, for the human population continues on growing, growing in almost all countries. And the human population remains huge anyhow. If you think that the human scent is not becoming quite strong all through the globe, then tell me, what does the air smell like then? Does it smell like a fresh forest smell? Not so much. Does it smell like pollution? Not so much, at least in in Western countries that have largely cleaned up pollution problems. No, I think the air smells like people, but our sense of smell is weak, and we get used to scents that are ever around us, so it is hard to tell on a conscious level. If dogs could talk, they might say that the entire planet reeks of people, except that dogs like people, so they are not so much complaining. Also, I suspect that humans can smell human pheromones, at least on the subconscious level, so young guys do not get spontaneous erections for just "no reason", but rather because they constantly smell people all around, who are fertile and "in heat", ever ready tor reproduce, and it makes us all the more horny or easily sexually-aroused. I wouldn't know how to prove this human-scent theory, as the human population keeps rising. We can't go back in time, and measure if this effect was in the past, less pronounced. But my theory defends allowing and encouraging people to just let their babies pump out freely, as we really can't so much control it, nor can we control our rising numbers. Nor do I see it as "bad". It is human-beneficial and natural.
In support of my human-scent prevalence theory, I think of an anecdotal observation of somebody who told me in some forum, that humans are having more sex than in the past. Hmm. I wonder why that might be? But when I asked him, saying that was curious, does he have any evidence to support that theory?, I do not recall ever getting an answer to that question. Sure, I suspect human sexual activity could be majorly on the rise, many married people now literally mate daily, however I wouldn't know how to measure this trend. Where is there any reliable baseline to compare against?
The "solution" should be obvious. It is the fellow humans who need to increase. If animals supposedly get crowded out, then be glad that you are not an animal. Besides, most animals are not very population-efficient, compared to humans. A single wild elephant can steal up to 400 pounds of food per night, from a poor person's garden. An obvious intolerable situation, that is solved by reducing the elephant population, and not the human population. You think it should be obvious by now, it is a *human* world.
Yosef MacGruber im not readin all that man, but just by skimming through your response you have absolutely no clue why its an important topic, aside from the deranged animal lovers, variation is actually a necessity of a viable and flourishing biosystem, variety of species is actually very important for Human survival, a simple intro to bio course would do you great benefit
PB42189
So which people are you aiming to eliminate?
In order to help humans survive, we should allow and help people to survive, yes? So where do you get population control out of that? Or did you think that waving a magic wand, somehow eases the "population pressure" without any pain?
You still didn't explain why we supposedly need population regulation?
What is unethical about stopping people from excessive reproduction? If I was breeding wasps and bee hives dropping them off in neighborhoods somebody would stop me. A lot of people roaches out there.
correct. But these people who think we are not overpopulated forget about the law of Supply and demand. More demand = higher costs. when there is not enough food for everyone, & they start growing hungry along with there Litter of Kids, maybe then they might get it. But by then, they will be too busy crying from Hunger like those kids in Africa.
You want to restrain 7 billion people from having too many babies? The reason that developing countries are having more babies is because they need more working hands, which in turn equals more food for family.
Pranay P I am not sure this is correct. In Haiti I have seen almost all the people NOT working because they did not have a place to work and generally this would be true if they would have land to cultivate or animal to grow so they need more people to perform physical labor. I believe they have more kids because they are less educated and have no pills. I have noticed that even in developed countries, the families with more kids are from the poor category.. same reason like lack of education or indifference..
allydea That is very interesting and probably true because I don't have much experience with the third world. So if I am interpreting this right, then the way to end overpopulation would be to give cheap or free birth control options (condoms, and pills). to places that need it, and give talks about sex education on the radio or public talks in 3rd world countries. Due to this being a fairly easy plan, are we (as a planet) putting this into action? Is there more to it than that? Or, are just not putting forth enough effort?
Pranay P It's not so easy, many countries of the third world don't have the income to put this plans into action, they are busy trying to build roads or buy high technology for their industries so that they "may" have a better income and stop being underdeveloped countries. Besides, in most countries of the "third world" corruption takes a big part in politics, so a lot of money we pay from our taxes goes to the politician's houses and families. And the poor are put in such a low category of priorities that even security, sanitation, human rights aren't accesible to them (In Latinamerica, where I come from, the police departament has so much work dealing with drug-mafias that they don't even have time to investigate rapists or murderers) let alone education or birth-control. If Latinamerica, a continent with a relatively low level of poverty faces this kind of problems, I don't want to think about how it is in Africa. To obtain my high school degree in Ecuador I had to do a month of social-help to non-educated people who hadn't finished grade-school. And I found out they were actually well aware of what condoms were and how to use them, and yet, half of the girls in my class had gotten pregnant at 14 or so and had to leave school, get married and have more babies with their husbands.
I really love Hank Green he is really interesting!!
In places like he discussed in sub Saharan Africa, it’s in a transitional stage where the death rate decreases and birth rate remains the same. It’s a problem now, but as time goes on the birth rate will go down. You see it a lot when countries become more industrialized, for us it happened in the industrial revolution
I feel like as the developing nations eventually develop, the birth rate (and therefore population) will start to level out. At a certain point, most countries will be fairly developed and have relatively low birthrates, causing a stable population of people living in an almost entirely developed world.
They do, according to the demographic transition model.
I hope that's true...
The problem is that most developing countries are stuck where they are. The entire foreign trade system is against them. A majority of what they produce are unprocessed, non-manufactured goods, like raw materials. This is because they don't have the development or the resources to create processed, manufactured goods. Developed countries buy the raw materials from these countries at a cheap price, turn it into something like a computer or a car, and sell it for a higher price. When these processed goods re-enter the global market, they make profit for the developed countries, but they are too expensive for developing countries to invest in.
Of course it isn't like they are stuck there forever. Some countries (especially asian countries in the last 60ish years) have been able to break this cycle. However, as a whole, the type of system we have now is rigged in favor of developed countries.
What we need to realize in our developed society is that all this poverty and disease isn't someone else's problem, it's our own. I feel like if we want to get to a world like you're talking about where everyone is more or less developed, it is our job to assist in that development. It's not going to happen on its own. Like it was said in the video, the fact that there are so much of us on earth contributes to the gap between the rich and the poor. If we want the '1 billion people' to be fed, the people with the power and money to do it (us) should just do it already!!!
Why is it that people in developed countries like Japan don't want children but those who can't necessarily afford to in less developed countries have so many?
Cause people like sex, but not everyone does it safely
It's a psychological trait for people from poorer places and/or places with high death rates. They have more children because there is a higher chance of one of your offspring surviving past childhood and carrying on your legacy. In richer countries like America we can have less because they will likely live past childhood. Japan is a whole different can of worms, if you want to know a lot more about it VICE did a great documentary on TH-cam as to why Japan isn't procreating.
Because in many of the undeveloped countries and developing countries in the world people see children as a potential asset to aid in hunting and farming whereas in developed nations children are basically seen as just another thing to spend money on, we still love our kids but you get the point.
Oh yeah and one more thing, people are horny.
One factor that might have contributed to Japan's negative birth rate is the fact that their median age (44.6 yrs) is the second highest of all countries in the world. More old people = fewer babies. The USA is somewhere in the middle of the list with a median age about 9 years younger. Interestingly enough the country with the second youngest median age, at 15, is Niger, which might explain why the primary occupation there is internet spam. : )
Additionally, we need to take the following into consideration: In developed countries, it is normal for women to have a certain amount of control over their bodies, i.e. they can afford and have access to contraceptive methods. That's not true for the majority of women in undeveloped countries though. And that makes a big difference.
Another key factor is education. E.g. in the US, girls from schools where they get taught abstinence-only ideals are far more likely to get pregnant as teenagers than girls from schools where they have proper sex education. The more you know about your body and the one of your partner, and how to have sex safely, the less likely you are to get pregnant. Then think about girls/women in undeveloped countries, and how little education they get on average. Same goes for boys/men btw - teach them about the bigger picture and they will be able to make better informed decisions. Even in developed countries, people who are have a higher degree of education on average have less children than those with a lower degree of education.
Technically, the agricultural revolution that started in England in the 1700s is what led to us being able to support so many people. It directly led to the industrial revolution as well, so it was the agricultural revolution, not the industrial
I would argue the industrial revolution had a bigger effect on food production than the agricultural revolution. Calorie for calorie.
Watching this in 2022 makes you notice how discussions on overpopulation have gone down and the hype has been replaced with population decline
So there were about 1361 baby's born during this video?
I hate when rich people think of village people as poor. Poverty is different than rural village living. Poverty is a bi-product of capitalism, capitalism is NOT the cure to poverty. thats like a snake eating its own shit to stop creating shit. Village way of living might not b spectacular with flashy fashions or all consuming electronic devices, but it is certainly sustainable and doesnt exploit others. All im saying is pls remember there is a diff between village life and poor people.
I'm sure the malnourished kids dying of ebola in Sierra Leone are ecstatic they don't live under a repressive capitalist regime and they have NO desire whatsoever to head to America and make a better life for themselves...
An Cap Poverty is the dark side of Greed. and capitalism harbors greed. Im not against employee ownership of the companies they work for, trade and barter systems, or non-fiat currency. Its the "exploitation" of other people's labor to "capitalize" im against.
jumpanama Nobody knows how the 2year old contracted the virus. Ebola can be the result of poverty, natural bacteria, pharmaceutical waste, or ancient DNA. Could Cancer and Obesity be the result of a glutinous plastic society? ANyway, you are talking 2013 problems -post GENerations of political (capitalist) corruption, mostly brought about by our government infiltrating, instigating, arming, and funding wars (for capitalist purposes). Like An Cap said, capitalism existed since mideival times -and i would argue even further back to the greeks and egyptians. ...loong before the ebola virus. The "poor" people are the victims caught between the wars for power. If left alone they'd have a better space to thrive. Thriving doesnt nec mean iPhones and petroleum.
I think you need to better structure your sentences, because I have no idea what you're trying to say. If you're arguing that the scientific community doesn't know what Ebola is, then you're just wrong. It's a virus that jumped from Fruit Bats to humans like the Swine Flu in 2009 jumped from pigs to humans.
As for corruption, that is literally the only thing Communist countries excelled in. Every year Russia had a food surplus, yet over half the time you could find a huge line for basic necessities such as bread wherever they were distributed from.
I agree wars should not be fought for resources, but that isn't true Free Market Capitalism, that is Cronyism. Cronyism/Corporatism is the process of a political representative looking after the needs of a company instead of the needs of his people. Communism also used this philosophy, only they looked after the needs of the Government.
If poverty were a by-product of Capitalism, then the poorest 10% of people living in Capitalist developed countries would also be the poorest people in the world, but that is decidedly not the case. Compare the poorest 10% to just the average in Communist countries like China and Cuba, and still the American has more wealth.
jumpanama I think you are skimming without actually reading. I'll try to write simple for you. The US is in debt trillions of dollars. It is a facade collapsing in on itself that can only survive by expanding and consuming (aka colonizing, exploiting, and depleting the resources of) other lands. Then there is the war economy... Am i getting too complicated for you?
America's wealth stands on the exploitation of its own people as well as those of other countries. We perpetuate their poverty rates through purchase of products made by slave labor in those countries. -Or by infiltrating their governments and corrupting any attempt to build with the people (for capitalist purposes).
good facts helped me with my homework
You know am a Kenyan , and just a month ago I was surviving on 100 shillings a day, that is 1 dollar a day, its not that bad.
statistics like those are always a bit misleading, because you can generally buy more for a dollar in poor countries (I admittedly do not know a lot about Kenya, so if it is not a poor country, I apologize). Especially for goods, which can be locally produced.
That is why the Big-Mac-Index is often used (Mc Donalds is everywhere, and produces somewhat locally).
So an american homeless person living on one dollar would have a harder time than someone from a very poor country.
Anyways, I just wanted to clarify that. I was not trying to say, that you don't have it very hard. You can be very proud of yourself for making it through such hard times.
I wish you and your family good luck for your future.
Just looked it up, the big mac index is 0.48$ in Kenya, so you lived on the equivalent of two dollars compared to an american homeless person.
That still is an insanely low amount. Again, I am glad that you made it through it.
May I ask, how you did that?
Does your family have animals or a farm or something like that, or did you really buy all food etc from that 100 shillings?
Do you have a job somewhere, or was it saved money?
(And how much does a normal job pay in your country?)
Again, I hope I am not too rude by asking all these questions. I have just read the wikipedia page of Kenya, and it looks like a very interesting country, so I am curious...
Good luck to you and your family
@@aldoushuxley5953 Yeah , it was kind of tough , but It was also kind of fun cause I had friends to wade through the daily hustle . Am currently in Germany pursuing Robotics Engineering in German :D, (came here by sheer luck and timing). Many families get to live a better life in the long run , and standards of living rise per generation. We own a farm but it isn't productive, that's the case with many families as its easier to earn a living in a blue or white collar job ( a paradigm that should change sooner than later) .
As for the 100shillings, I remember you had to forgo lunch or have a fruit with tea which costs 10shillings , breakfast cost about 20shillings and we had supper with my pals, which made it cheaper. The biggest cost was rent , and I used to work for rent. The work I did then was to try (I learnt as I went on with the task ) to write software solutions to a certain company and get paid , I also dubbed in other informal economic activities if need be.
If you have questions I'd love to answer them for you
@@mberoakoko24 Hey, I am in Germany too :D
What state do you live in?
I study physics in Heidelberg (Baden Würtemberg)
I am very glad to hear that you are doing better, and robotics is an extremely interesting subject!
Is the productivity of the farm a technological problem (or international competition), or is it hard to perform agriculture in Kenya in general (because of the soil, the temperature etc. ..)?
That sounds very hard!
I didn't even remember rent. Wow!
It is very interesting to me that you had to live of so little as a software engineer.
To be honest, I did not picture you to be so educated.
Naively, I would have guessed, that as a programmer, one could compete on the international market and take jobs for american companies, if need be.
Anyways, glad you were able to make it and guten Morgen I guess ^^
How comfortable are you in your german?
Do you prefer to keep this conversation in english?
@@mberoakoko24 Oh, and perhaps more importantly:
- What do you think of Germany?
- What do you think of the Germans?
- Is there something Kenya can learn from Germany?
- Is there something Germany can learn from Kenya?
Dear Sci-Show,
Can you PLEASE answer a question I have?
I am a long time viewer and subscriber (from the start of your channel), and LOVE your show.
I find that I am tired often, which I know is an obvious side affect of my depression related to a recent break up. This got me wondering,… do our bodies produce extra melatonin when we are depressed? OR if not melatonin, at least some type of chemical equivalent, that makes us extra sleepy? AND If so, WHY?
What would justify this evolutionary behavior?
What is the selective advantage for this trait?
the google document file you linked, takes me to buy instagram followers?
yeah wtf. talk a bout underhanded advertising
If you look up the domain on the internet archive, you'll see that in 2012 it was in fact a link shortener. That means that he used that site to shorten the link to the document back then, and someone has since bought the domain and made that Instagram follower site. There's not any advertising involved.
who would love buy youtube red while the process?
I think a global population law should be placed in every country in the world
more like a single city, somewhere in the world, will randomly explode.
Each city will be chosen once a week to balance out the rate of loss to the rate of gain.
how bout an induced zombie apocalypse
Yeah I don't think the UN is going to ban sex (a lot a country's don't have birth control)
Look at Japan's birth and death statistics. Good Night.
but it is exponential growth
All of the people born in this video are now 7 years old...
8 now
Hank I really like your hair around 4:35
I'm probably going to get a lot of hate for this comment anyways, but...
IF THEY ARE STARVING AND POOR, WHY DO THEY CHOOSE TO HAVE TONS OF KIDS? THEY'RE ACTUALLY RUINING THEMSELVES.
People who expect to have a lower life expectancy have more kids earlier, whilst those who expect to live longer can wait have fewer children and put more resources into each child. Just evolution trying to spread genes before death I guess
You're good at listening at basic things.
Additionally, in countries where the mortality rate is quite high, and elderly parents require their children support them after retirement, you need to have more kids in order to safeguard yourself. That is, the death of one child is has less impact if you have 3-4 others, than if it was an only child. (I am of course talking purely in terms of economic and security reasons; emotionally I'm sure it's always as terrible)
turns out that sex is pretty popular everywhere, and turns out birth control isn't much of a thing in 3rd world countries.
I'm sure if condoms were more accessible in Africa I'm absolutely certain that a lot less babies would be born there
More Babies = More Workers. If one of them survives you have a worker.
Why can't we have a Bengal tiger in our high rise as long as we scoop the box every day?
it is an irony seeing that grass became successful as a plant adapted to a cooling and drying earth. grasslands replaced tropical jungles.
Hank is so dang Kool😊
I can afford to eat meat, but I DON'T. I found out in 1988 exactly how much waste was involved in one pound of human produced meat product and I stopped eating it that year. I am quite satisfied by vegetarian with chicken eggs and no meat at all.
Interesting... Now I should probably do my history project. (SciShow... y u so interesting?)
Hank- "We have a lot of the water trapped in glaciers"
Global Warming- "Hold my Beer" :P
Parthasarathi Panda businessmen: ooh sounds like an opportunity
You guys should see the late Hans Roslings ted talks on the subject
The problem is any organism from bacteria to humans, if given the chance will overpopulate itself into extinction. The difference may be we can see overpopulation as a life ending problem and maybe do something about it as a species. Unfortunately if we don't have enough of us working to fix the problem, the others will continue to overpopulate while we try not to (see global climate change). People argue about it like there are two sides to discuss. The climate is changing, we as a species are dumping massive quantities of Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere. If 10 million of the 7+ billion people on the planet cut back their carbon dioxide emissions that won't make a difference. Overpopulation is the same way. If 750 million people decide to breed in a sustainable fashion while the other 6.25 billion people keep breeding in an unsustainable way...well, that is game over. We don't need an asteroid; overpopulation will be the event that drives us into extinction. If you don't believe it, that won't matter. We will die as a species anyway. If you are leaning on religion saying your god wants us to breed and he will take care of us, that won't matter. We will die anyway. The question is whether or not enough people will look at this problem and help to address it. If not, game over.
It's honestly disturbing how many people think adopting a global X # of children per family law would stop or slow down overpopulation. Laws like these only make the problem *worse*. A better solution would be to do whatever possible to promote and support economic growth, improve quality of education, and cut back on harmful intervention in underdeveloped countries.
It actually does work lmao
A human-denser world benefits far more people than cruel and deceptive population arbitrary limits. One of very many reasons why I have to favor the natural population expansion. I have long advocated having larger families and watching and better accommodating the natural increase of humans. I very much agree with the huge numbers of people who have various objections against birth control. Most reasons for having more children, are actually quite valid.
Also, by this time, having a very populous planet, could seem sort of inevitable anyway? Why fight against what must be, and what is so beneficial to the people? Or even God's doing? So I very much agree with people's big families and countries wanting to increase their already-so-large populations. If even more people can be made to fit, why not?
China's one child policy did work to slow population growth and it wasn't as draconian as westerners paint it. Imagine the mess China would be in if people continued to have 6-7 children per family!
i love this guy's accent!
I liked this video so much I almost made a baby with it, but then I thought of world population, and how this video would a terrible mom, and decided not to.
But foreal, this video covers so much important information that the majority of the public don't know. I liked almost everything I learned from this video.