@@CanonUSA I'm excited to see how we'll continue innovating, and I can’t wait to push the boundaries of my creativity to capture fantastic images in the future.
Noise, and file quality... My old 1DX has the best of all the cameras I own, besting 5DSRs and 5DIVs, so 12 years later I have no doubt the R1 files are amazing.
@@joaquintrigueros That makes sense. Remember, the larger the file size, the more noise at “high” ISO. This is why the R1 has embraced the 24-megapixel file size.
Phenomenal pictures coming out the R1 but I have to say that the 400mm 2.8 and 600mm f4 are also Phenomenal lenses so what a nice 20 thousand dollar camera + lens setup!
@@hawaiifreespeechnews Indeed, the lenses you use for life and the bodies get traded for advanced image sensors and technology. I LOVE the EF600mm f4 L IS USM vIII lens. I wish 🙏 that I had the 400 f2.8 lens!
The AF is bonkers good, noticably better for the initial lock than the R3. It also does a much better job ignoring things that you want it to. I'll need a month or so to understand it all. Being 100% confident in the ES is nice too.
@@richschmitt100 Canon lowered the data rates for the lower end 4K video to 250 Mbps and the 4k 120p video down to 350 Mbps compared to the R3 at 1080 Mbps at 4K 120p. The video is also linked skipped, so it was a combination of a few items that Canon seemed to compromise on. The R3 also has a slightly faster sensor readout. I honestly also felt like the R3 was more responsive for photography. Compared to the R5 the R5 II is a massive upgrade.
I have mates with the R3, and they cannot take the shots I have been taking with the precapture function on my R5mkii. The R5mkii focus is better than the R3. I guess if I wanted to shoot video seriously, I would buy a serious video camera, but the 8k60 looks fine to me.
@@nordic5490 The R5 II AF is not better than the R3. They tried to bring the R5 II up to the level of the R3 but it didn't surpass the R3. If it did it would be on the level of the R1 and it is not. The R5 II has a lower sensor response than the R3 and that's on measured results by Canon. Think about it. The R3 has a faster processor, faster sensor and line skipped video which sacrifices detail and lower data rate for all video except 4K fine and raw. You are trying ro connect pre capture with AF and they are not the same. Pre-capture just means you start shooting a little sooner which you can do with any camera. Again, you are confusing the marketing hype with reality. Everything you claim about the R5 II would make it just as good as the R1. The R1 is how much better than the R3? 10%, so you claim the R5 II has passed the R3 by 5% which means you are saying the R5 II is as good as the R1. The hardware and physics of the R5 II makes it impossible to be as good as the R1. The r3 was the flagship camera before the R1 and the R5 II is not a flag ship camera in 2024. As you use the R5 II to shoot birds you will see what it can do and can't do.
@@Makta972 THANK YOU. If that is true, I was unaware that Olympus mirrorless cameras used cross-type focus. I will look further into this information. Canon was the first full-frame mirrorless camera to use a cross-type focus point.
Great information on the canon r1, so great that I traded canon r3 in for the r1. A lot to learn. Looking forward to your next video.
@@mitchconn7712 AWESOMENESS. You are going to love the R1 the autofocus is the best 🌟
Wow....@15:29 the R1 locked that incoming bird's eyes amazingly fast...faster than I thought possible. Incredible. Thanks for putting this together.
Thanks for sharing your awesome, real-world feedback!
@@CanonUSA always!
@@CanonUSA I'm excited to see how we'll continue innovating, and I can’t wait to push the boundaries of my creativity to capture fantastic images in the future.
Great video, thank you! You’ve gained another sub.
Noise, and file quality... My old 1DX has the best of all the cameras I own, besting 5DSRs and 5DIVs, so 12 years later I have no doubt the R1 files are amazing.
@@joaquintrigueros That makes sense. Remember, the larger the file size, the more noise at “high” ISO. This is why the R1 has embraced the 24-megapixel file size.
Phenomenal pictures coming out the R1 but I have to say that the 400mm 2.8 and 600mm f4 are also Phenomenal lenses so what a nice 20 thousand dollar camera + lens setup!
@@hawaiifreespeechnews Indeed, the lenses you use for life and the bodies get traded for advanced image sensors and technology.
I LOVE the EF600mm f4 L IS USM vIII lens. I wish 🙏 that I had the 400 f2.8 lens!
The AF is bonkers good, noticably better for the initial lock than the R3. It also does a much better job ignoring things that you want it to. I'll need a month or so to understand it all. Being 100% confident in the ES is nice too.
@@CanonRumorsOfficial Indeed, the R1 is all that and a bag of chips!
Great video, thank you!
@@howardholtzman1331 thank you, I appreciate your support
Review R1 or the printer?
@@acemanNL the R1, but printing shows the quality of the image sensor
I tested the r3 vs the R5 II and was not impressed with the R5 II.
@@contentm3893 That depends on your goal for the test. The right camera for the right job. Both are excellent choices, but only one is right for you.
Why were u not impressed with the R5 II?
@@richschmitt100 Canon lowered the data rates for the lower end 4K video to 250 Mbps and the 4k 120p video down to 350 Mbps compared to the R3 at 1080 Mbps at 4K 120p.
The video is also linked skipped, so it was a combination of a few items that Canon seemed to compromise on. The R3 also has a slightly faster sensor readout. I honestly also felt like the R3 was more responsive for photography.
Compared to the R5 the R5 II is a massive upgrade.
I have mates with the R3, and they cannot take the shots I have been taking with the precapture function on my R5mkii.
The R5mkii focus is better than the R3.
I guess if I wanted to shoot video seriously, I would buy a serious video camera, but the 8k60 looks fine to me.
@@nordic5490 The R5 II AF is not better than the R3. They tried to bring the R5 II up to the level of the R3 but it didn't surpass the R3. If it did it would be on the level of the R1 and it is not. The R5 II has a lower sensor response than the R3 and that's on measured results by Canon.
Think about it. The R3 has a faster processor, faster sensor and line skipped video which sacrifices detail and lower data rate for all video except 4K fine and raw.
You are trying ro connect pre capture with AF and they are not the same.
Pre-capture just means you start shooting a little sooner which you can do with any camera. Again, you are confusing the marketing hype with reality. Everything you claim about the R5 II would make it just as good as the R1.
The R1 is how much better than the R3? 10%, so you claim the R5 II has passed the R3 by 5% which means you are saying the R5 II is as good as the R1. The hardware and physics of the R5 II makes it impossible to be as good as the R1. The r3 was the flagship camera before the R1 and the R5 II is not a flag ship camera in 2024.
As you use the R5 II to shoot birds you will see what it can do and can't do.
不错
It's always the older generation that hype up the 1DX/R3/R1 cameras interestingly.
WRONG it's NOT the first mirrorless camera with cross type focus sensor. The Olympus OM1 did it first years ago.
@@Makta972 THANK YOU. If that is true, I was unaware that Olympus mirrorless cameras used cross-type focus. I will look further into this information. Canon was the first full-frame mirrorless camera to use a cross-type focus point.
Сейчас бы на R1 свадьбы снимать, лол :D
If only the gray-haired click weezel could make videos like this. Awesome video.
@@dfj555 thank you