Old vs New Tokina 11-16 2.8 EF: PRO DX vs ATX-i | Shot on RED Komodo | 2007 vs 2019 version

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @ReachFilms
    @ReachFilms  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just a heads up this video has been uploaded for a few days and has been stuck on 1080, this has happened to the past few videos, the 4k version should be ready soon!

    • @adrienpayet
      @adrienpayet 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was like "hey there's no 4K", thanks a lot for this comparaison I was looking for it, I'm coming back when 4K is up !

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I’ve waited 3 days and no 4K but assuming the servers are bogged down

    • @adrienpayet
      @adrienpayet 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReachFilms Sometimes TH-cam doesn't want to... But thanks a lot!

  • @justlongn8565
    @justlongn8565 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As far as I know, the two versions are optically identical, but the atx has more advanced coating that helps reduce flares, therefore has a slightly different color cast. The minor difference in sharpness all comes down to sample variance, I would say.

  • @mohde7958
    @mohde7958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what bout lens flare comparison ????

  • @popcornparam
    @popcornparam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the price of the old version ?? (When it was launched )

  • @celsogama9044
    @celsogama9044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for all this info! Do you miss a stabilizer on this lens when using on Tha gimbal? Between canon 10-18 and the tokina 11-16 much dif?

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Image quality on the Tokina is much better

  • @TheDude-vx6wn
    @TheDude-vx6wn ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice. Did you tweak contrast in post and use filters when filming?

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t think so but I filmed this video quite a while ago

  • @curiousminds5415
    @curiousminds5415 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi! Thanks for the review! Do you know if both are compatible for Nikon? I have D5300. Thank you!

  • @TheDude-vx6wn
    @TheDude-vx6wn ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. These are versions 1 and 3 correct? Would love to see a comparison between versions 1 and 2. Have you seen them compared?

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  ปีที่แล้ว

      I have not I only had the 1 and 3 versions

  • @yshrem
    @yshrem 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've had the version 2 of this lens for a few years now, (Nikon mount version) and have been using it with a "dumb" adapter on my GH4 and GH5, but now, that I've got the Komodo, I decided to get the new Tokina 11-20mm 2.8 (which didn't yet exist when I originally purchased my 11-16). To be clear, I got the version that looks just like the new 11-16, not the Cinema version. I'm very happy with that purchase, and am using it on both my Komodo and my GH5 with a Speedbooster. I highly recommend it!

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s awesome to hear Yuval! The only reason I didn’t go for the 11-20 was because it overlapped with my sigma 18-35 and from what I understand the 11-16 is lighter for gimbal work

    • @yshrem
      @yshrem 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReachFilms not really. They seem to me to be almost identical in size and weight (non-scientific statement). The 11-20 also overlaps for me with the 24-70, when the latter is on the Canon Speedbooster, but the Tokina has a different look and very low distortion in comparison to other wide angle lenses.

    • @tariqueorderson9808
      @tariqueorderson9808 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yshrem what is the 11-20 focal length on the gh5. i the eleven close to an 8mm on the gh5

    • @yshrem
      @yshrem 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tariqueorderson9808 it depends on the adapter you use. With the Metabones Ultra x0.71 the 11mm turns to 7.8mm, which is a hair wider than 8mm, and also effectively turns the F2.8 lens to an F2.0 lens.

    • @tariqueorderson9808
      @tariqueorderson9808 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yshrem thank you! btw would that 2.0 let in more light than my Panasonic 25mm 1.7

  • @sourityadas6041
    @sourityadas6041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for such a detailed review. I'm looking to do some Milky way photography with a Nikon D7500 but am confused whether to buy a Tokina 11-16 f2.8 or a Tokina 11-20 f2.8. I've read some pretty good reviews about the 11-16 but also that it gives a hard time to focus at infinity, which I believe is essential to photograph the milky way. Kindly advise which lens should I go with?

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey man thank you for watching! I have not used this lens for Astrophotography so unfortunately I don’t think I can help on this one .

    • @sourityadas6041
      @sourityadas6041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ReachFilms No worries at all. I'll look up in Google to get an idea. Problem is there are too many people giving absolutely contradicting statements, which makes it really confusing.

    • @matteodonofrio
      @matteodonofrio หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sourityadas6041 I'm looking for this lense for astrophoto too, did you get the lense at last?

    • @sourityadas6041
      @sourityadas6041 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi @@matteodonofrio I got the Tokina 11-20 f2.8 on April 2022, and its working well for the last 2.5 years

  • @larry123467
    @larry123467 ปีที่แล้ว

    the old version is being sold here for $200 used , is that a good deal?

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wouldn't say its a good deal, I would say its priced about where it should be

    • @larry123467
      @larry123467 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReachFilms ic thank u, bought in for 180 with a little persuasion 🙂, now to lóok for a used 18-35

  • @TDCIYB77
    @TDCIYB77 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I am still confused, and hope you can help to clarify:
    I want to get a used 11-16 to go along with my Sigma 18-35 on my BMPCC 4K and G85 with Speedbooster. As i don't have much money, i was planning to get the old V1 as it costs under 200€ compared to 300€ for V2.
    Is there any other difference between the V1 and V2 besides coatings (autofocus, focus wheel, material)?
    The new V3 is 3 times as much money, and not reasonable for my budget. But why did you say you would recommend the V3 to Sigma 18-35 users?
    Thanks in advance! :)

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      if you can find a good deal on the old one, it will make due, I found the actual housing of the lens was the biggest difference overall

    • @TDCIYB77
      @TDCIYB77 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReachFilms Thanks for answering! :)

  • @bradleykussy
    @bradleykussy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the Tokina 11-20 atx pro? How would you stack it against the 11-16?

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Slightly better build on the new version, slightly different coating on the front element but similar optics, that’s are the differences but when it comes to performance haven’t tested

  • @mrvk699
    @mrvk699 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i am confused between old Tokina 11-16 and new Tokina 11-16 for Nikon. Price difference is a lot that is why I dont know what to purchase.

  • @anphiibian5013
    @anphiibian5013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you ever used it with speedbooster?

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes I’ve used it with the Viltrox speedbooster, I have a video on it, check out my Komodo playlist to see it

    • @anphiibian5013
      @anphiibian5013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReachFilms on it 🙏

  • @striderwhiston9897
    @striderwhiston9897 ปีที่แล้ว

    They were focused differently in some comparison clips

  • @mohde7958
    @mohde7958 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    couple of questions i hoped you had addressed in your review. does the front element of the new version rotate? and if it has metal mount , in versus website they show that it has no metal mount and the front element rotate in contrast to the older version, since I'm not trusting that website much i want your help

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey! So on the new version the mount is metal (do not have the old version anymore). Also the internals of the lens do not move so everything is contained inside the lens

    • @mohde7958
      @mohde7958 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReachFilms this may be a good topic of your next alarming video 😂

  • @JordanSubido
    @JordanSubido 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    some of your shots on the Pro DX is either out of focus from 2:01 or your focusing at something else

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It could very well be so, thanks for letting me know and thanks for watching

    • @JordanSubido
      @JordanSubido 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ReachFilms In 2021 I sold my zcam and Sony a7iii for gh5 and a gh5s. Sold 1 cine lens to buy the Pro de version 1 and 2 primes. Best thing I have ever done. Paired well with my dji ronin s2

  • @ytv2024
    @ytv2024 ปีที่แล้ว

    old lens looks like it's got a slight red tint

  • @pawelfiedorczuk
    @pawelfiedorczuk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, can I ask for music name

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey! So I don’t remember the song name but all the music I use now is from soundstripe.com

  • @scott_the_dreamer
    @scott_the_dreamer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great review brotha

    • @ReachFilms
      @ReachFilms  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Scott! Much appreciated

  • @davidandersonpark6810
    @davidandersonpark6810 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bought the old one and kt was reaonable choice

  • @Ton-x4r
    @Ton-x4r หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well I have the 11-16 newest version and the old 11-20. Let me summ up a few things:
    - AF very unriable. This is not a back or front focus issue. AF is all over the place.
    - CA is 😩😩😩😩😩
    - they rave about sharpness, well take a look at the edges and corners. One big mess at any f stop
    - the 11-16mm at 16mm and at f5.6 and above shows incorrect exposure
    - the 11-20mm at 20mm is unsharp
    Very disappointed as you may guess.

  • @zolen3046
    @zolen3046 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think there are some shots where the focus points are different. Overall I'd say I see the new one sharper but has lost that creamy cinema looking and gain some purple fringing in exchange.

  • @lightleaked
    @lightleaked 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    they are identical ... chromatic/purples and magenta hue.. im gonna skip it thanx for the comparison

  • @auxmike718
    @auxmike718 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    More vignetting on old one

  • @Integr8d
    @Integr8d 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Between these two samples, new one looks sharper but also has stronger CA...

  • @RodneyCooperFilmz
    @RodneyCooperFilmz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man, the CA on these lenses are terrible!!

  • @FrankyFixIt
    @FrankyFixIt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chalk it up to age difference and fogging in the lens