I chose the A7CR over the V because of the size and weight. I chose it over the A7Cii because of the ability to crop even more and get away with just one prime lens. Why? I want best possible image quality while paragliding and bike packing (sometimes in dim light). Weight, size is obviously a big factor.
The best Sony camera to buy now is a used a9 if you could get one at around US$1500. Stacked sensor, still one of the best autofocus, 20fps (15fps with third-party lenses), very good battery life. It's as affordable as a used XH2 or OM1 here in Taiwan. Downside: asymmetrical card slots (one of a reason that kept me away from many Canon and Nikon cameras), only 5fps in mechanical shutter, micro-USB port, poor smartphone control compared to models older than the a7R2 or models newer than the a1.
most interesting with Sony line is that their old camera models aren't discontinued and its a bit unfortunate they aren't included here (but I understand that you have to cover new models and it would be too many camera compared in one video if all currently produced options were included). I would prefer A7III over A7IV for example. IMO no tilt screen is a dealbreaker and flipscreen is just horrible to use and improvements in photos dont justify price increase (and I dont do video). I would rather buy A7III and Sigma 85mm f/1.4 Art, same price as A7IV body only...
I haven’t seen you in a while and I noticed that your video quality is so much better now. Way to evolve for the better. Thanks for the video. I’ve been thinking about updating A99.
Got a Olympus OM1 for 1100$ + Olympus 12-40 f2.8 for 400$ and since i use it for hiking/mountaineering on rough conditions on temps like -25'C or climbing i think it was a smart choice going for a tough light system.I could never see myself dragging a Sony A7R5 + 24-70 f2.8 (around 5000$ combo) on this conditions and the extra bulk.The IBIS is just insane so low light is really not a problem for me. Handheld exposure of 2-3seconds no problem. Heck it does really well on astro with a little Laowa 7.5mm f2!
I have zero problems with dragging A7RV with Tamron 28-200 on hiking trips. We live once and all shots you take will stay with you untill you die and possibly long beyond that. Some more weight didt make that much difference but image quality definitely is better, especially dynamic range is huge. More weight is worth it in my opinion.
what is best for picture? im focus on picture.. im posting now but is not good quality im using NIKON P1000 😂😂 that is not for photo quality, just zoom moon sun stars and animals and some macro, but Sonny is best,, but there are so many types
@@Festvangelist Nothing in Fuji is better option than any camera in this video. Autofocus is at a bottom of camera market and a glass is just a bunch of casual overpriced primes for street photography. Everything that costs over 1000$ isnt worth your money in Fuji lineup.
I think Mark Bennett has a video with that specific comparison. The a6700 is my main driver for wildlife because of the 1.5 times crop and 4K 120. If you're a birder, that camera may be a better choice than the a7r5 since that model does not have 4K 120. If you're not frequently shooting at 600 mm focal lengths or above, or you don't prefer a smaller camera, the a74 is probably a better choice with better Ibis, generally better image quality, better handling experience, and many other things. Comparisons of cameras are difficult since we're individuals so I would watch videos on each camera and see which one checks the most boxes. If you have a lot of excellent Sony glass, the a6700 is a high performance beast at a very low price point, but I would rather have the A74 for Astro, landscape, portraiture, concerts, indoor low light shooting, weddings, and travel, but that last one may be better with the a6700 if you have fast APS-C glass and you want to be more inconspicuous. If you haven't already, try watching videos by Gordon Laing, The Hybrid Shooter, Dustin Abbott, Christopher Frost, and the aforementioned Mark Bennett's Camera Crisis. Also, the a7c2 should be considered if you like that form factor.
I’m still using A7R2 for stills, the sensor is just so good still, miss the joystick and latest autofocus but i can still shoot 4k video if necessary. Really considering the A7r5 but it sure is a lot of money
Weekness' of the A7R5 sensor's technology type, not even alluded to, as so often : ( go and find out. Many. inherent consequences such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications, and more.) I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip. Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP. I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work. These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
I would agree with your assessment. I own the A7R5. As a general assignment focusing on portraits and events photographer the A7R5 more than meets my needs. Exceptional image quality in a camera that checks many of the boxes that I am concerned about. I believe that the A7R5 is the right camera for the job.
..except .... the A7R5 sensor's technology type, not even alluded here to, as so often : ( some good serious reports/studies 'out there". : Many. inherent consequences such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications, and more.) I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip. Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP. I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work. These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
@@AR-vf7vg everyone has their own reasons for choosing a camera. everyone shoots different subjects, so it only makes sense that everyone's preferences will differ
@@IRFAN-po5sz (Here at least is a visual clue : A7RV is among those body-design évolutions (among the different A-series), where it"s "top big wheel" is now "double layered". Thus here, custom mémorisations (any?) adress/switches either video or stills modes of these cameras specifically. Selection of any Custom1, C2, C3 no longer affects necessarily both as tied. Now, sensor-type wise: it's design puts it on the rolling-effect prone (unesthetic/transforming distortion effects) cameras, meaning, prone/systematic ; "only" if you have to use it wile in "those many" conditions, where these effectd get triggered. Perhaps never in your prioritezed working environments /situations. But those priorisations of yours, myself I am NOT expert on the video side, so You have to define elsewhere what categories fall best in line for You, and generally or speciffically .)
I am shooting while travelling..My first Sony- combo with 3 primes (fe35 2.8 , 55 1.8 and batis25 )and A7r1 was only 1200 Gramm total - by impressive iq- but changed to A7r 3 because of the shutter Shock- and added the 24-105 for travelling- to protect the sensor better- i am happy with that…
I'm a Canon user switching to Sony A7RV, 16-35 f4 G, 24-70mm f2.8 GMII, 70-200mm f2.8 GMII OSS, 1.4x TC, HVL-F60RM2, CFexpress Type A 80GB & SDXC SF-G 64GB UHS-II
@@kevinrtres Nah. I'm just a ordinary software developer - nothing special at all :) But I'm 62 and I did save up during the years to buy the gear I wanted (be it Canon then and now Sony)! I thought "I can't afford a Ferrari or a Mclaren" - but I love photography and I can afford the best gear if I can wait long enough and save for it.
For me i am primarily a wedding and real-estate photographer and i do some video as well also i do drone video For my cameras for fast photo and good video i use the fujifilm xh2s with the new 1.4 primes the 8-16 2.8 for indoor video and wide shots of the event halls and the 80mm 2.8 macro for the ring shots and any other detailed close up photos i need And for low light photos portrait some product shots on occasion and for real-estate stills i use my gfx 100s with the 50mm 3.5 for group photos and portraits and i use the tilt shift lenses for the real-estate stills
Thank you for the breakdown of these cameras. From the photography perspective point of view, I would breakdown even more on the shutter noise level which extremely few people actually mentions yet an extremely important topic in real life camera usage. As an event photographer, the A7 IV and A7R V's noisy mechanical curtain shutters (~3.5ms) both got quiet a few BIG eye rolls and official complains in many events and locations I had photographed that involves both flash and artificial/indoor lighting photography. Both cameras can not operate the flash without the mechanical shutter curtain and the silent electronic shutter does not have the Anti-Flicker feature to operate without getting bending effect in indoor artificial lighting conditions due to their slow sensor readout speeds at ~66ms for A7 IV and ~99ms for A7R V unless the facility has invested in high quality LED lights. On the other hand, the A1 and A9 III both have fast silent electronic sensor read out at ~3.8ms for A1 and ~0.0ms for A9 III that can activate the Anti-Flicker/Variable Anti-Flicker feature to operate flashes at 1/200s or 1/250s for A1's Full/APS-C mode (1/400s & 1/500s with mechanical shutter) and 1/800,000s or 1/160,000s for A9 III depending on the lens used. Of course when using the silent electronic shutter the mechanical curtain shock vibration is eliminated as well as no mechanical actuation count or ware and tare are involved with the mechanical shutter mechanism system which also product cleaner images with higher resell value when upgrading. These are amazing useful features that many owner like me found out too late after purchased the less expansive models.
I'm seriously considering an a7iv at the moment as i contemplate migrating from my Canon DSLR system. I'm an amateur stills photographer. The a7iv is affordable (just), has great performance , image quality and sensible file sizes . Sure , i would like the higher burst speed and pre capture of the A9 , but short of selling a kidney , thats not going to happen. The availability of 3rd party glass and reasonably priced used Sony lenses is a bonus.
Hey Matt. I bought the A7RV when it was released. My budget may have not yet recovered. LOL. And I added the A7CII for street and urban photography. I am a b it lazy and I must admit that I am startled how good the files out of A7RV are straight out of camera when I shoot in Auto mode. For portrait and landscape, the images are really really good.
Matt I appreciate your in depth analysis of all the systems. I've shot with an A7 IV since it was released along with the Sony 200-600. I just recently acquired the Sony 300 GM/2.8 with both Sony TCs wanting better IQ and was blown away! I shoot a lot of wildlife and birds and I found the combo remarkably good but wanted more. Namely better AF. Better speed. A good friend of mine got an A9 III and I observed what it could do. I was impressed to say the least. He has an A1 also and after shooting with the A9 III has become very enamored with it Yes, like many others I always wanted an A1 but thought $6500 for a 3 year old camera was too much considering what else is out there. Well after much thought I just recently acquired an A9 III and an A7R5 and sold my A7 IV. This was after much consideration of my shooting goals and needs and multiple hours of watching videos like yours and many others. I participated in many Sony groups on FB and discussions and the bottom line is, I feel happy with my decisions and love both systems! I did consider the Nikon Z8 but I am so ensconced in the Sony ecosystem that I felt switching would be too much. At least in my case. Well after shooting with both Sony systems I’m excited at the possibilities going forward! The tech and form factor updates are amazing. The IQ is really good with the A9 III and the DR, ISO and resolution issues talked to death IMO are overblown and negligible really. It’s just a great camera hands down! All these changes have to surface in a new A1 II I feel. But when? My friend doesn't think it will happen anytime soon as the current A1 is still selling well. Nobody knows. I’ll have to address that occurrence if it ever happens but in the meantime, I’m very satisfied. Thanks again for all your in depth and informative reviews! It helped me a lot! 👍🏻
Can we buy a7c mark 1 over a6700 with tamron 28-200 + samyang 85 f1.4 for photography or should i wait for few months to get price drop on a74 after launching a75
A7rv here with too many lenses currently (trying to downsize inventory). Spent 2 helpless weeks browsing through stores confused as to which camera /hybrid to get……then I found your video here and it made the decision easy…. And also, Sony just kicked in an extra $400 discount to boot on the a7rv.
For me, the A7RV was never an option, as at that time, I already owned the A7S, A7RII and A9. I got the A1 when it was available 3 years ago and now i bought the A9III 2 month ago. Apart from the resolution, it is by far the best camera in the SONY lineup. It's low light AF is even better than on the A1. This matters more, than the lower ISO performance. The sightly lower DR is no issue for my fast action sports and concert photography, as no output media can reproduce more than 12 stops at it best, with printers and displays at around 10 stops anyway. Not even to mention jpg, which can only reproduce 8 stops.
And the a9iii is a better video camera than the A1. It has the best dynamic range in video than any other camera in Sonys mirrorless line. Yes this a a fact that is supported from lab test from CineD and my own personal use from me owning an A1 A7rv a7siii and fx6
I would 100% agree (for me too), had it at least 33MP. Sadly had to renounce. (BTW I add reposte of mine here ....the A7R5 sensor's technology type, not even alluded here to, as so often : ( some good serious reports/studies 'out there". : Many. inherent consequences such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications, and more.) I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip. Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP. I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work. These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
@@AR-vf7vg For me, 24Mp is ok, as the the GS is far more beneficial than 33Mp. And I still have the A1 and A7RII, if I need more Mpx. Yes the A7RII is still one of the best cameras for high resolution and the price is unbeatable, if you can get one second hand.
@@renestaempfli1071 just clarify for eventual newcomers to sony cameras ..that I meant writing more clearl before; that I still use (2x) A7R2 to best advantages, but also a r3 (aboth models have the same sensor, as you know). I'd however stress that I definitally recommend find r3 over the r2 just only because of the immensely better battery type, and that are interchangeable with all their 'current model cameras'. (sure, not an issue for setups that allow or requier to bypass the batteries.)
I bought the A7Cr as a travel camera. Ive had the A7Riii for some years and wanted to get something lighter to take on a Europe trip. Ive teamed this with a 17mm Sigma f/4 lens that I love using. All metal construction and a magnetic lens cap. At 17mm I can get closer to subjects than those using phones so can avoid the “someone is in my photo” syndrome (although I am careful to get my shot quickly and move away for others). Great for all those tourist icons I’ve been viewing. I also picked up a 28 to 200mm Tamron that is not as nice to use. I do wish there was a modern 24 or 28 to 200mm that had good optical quality in a lightweight body - and yes give me a magnetic lens cover again.
Still using my A7R4 and loving everything about it for Wildlife and Portrait photography paired with Sony GM 70-200 , F2.8 ii or 200-600 G lens. My next camera would be the new A1…when it eventually comes out
A7iv for mostly sports here. In this application, it should be described as a 6 FPS camera because of AF capabilities. But it has a full mechanical shutter that lacks to the A7cii. I wish Sony wiĺl create a camera with great tracking, 33+ MP, 15 FPS an a vertically tilting screen. None of their current cameras meets those requirements.
Thank you, Matt. This is a super helpful high-level overview of the today's relevant Alpha models. I work in high-end/big brand advertising. I have always been a Canon shooter for my (photo) commercial campaign work but am likely going to make the jump to Sony. Seems I've been slowly been migrating (without conscious intention) for the past few years - FX3 (for indie film projects), A7Cii (for location/tech scouting and personal travel) and very soon to purchase an Alpha pro camera. I have been considering the A7r V and like you, think it checks all the boxes (for photography). But admittedly I keep eyeing the A9iii... even though there's a significant price jump. Any thought on the older A9ii or would you still rather go for the A7r V? Thank you!
This video sounds a lot like a comment I made on one of your previous videos. I have the RX100vii, the new a7Cii (I ordered it the day it was announced) and the a7Riv, and I think that covers my Travel and Portrait photography quite well.
I do a lot of sports and wildlife, getting into sony this year I got a 200-600 and a a9 ver 1 used and it is a great setup for my needs, still getting used to the focus and tracking system..
I'm very happy with my a7IV, and while the market has changed a bit over the past few years, I haven't been tempted to upgrade at all. The larger sensor and more versatile screen on the a7RV may have come close to tempting me, but I intend to use the a7IV for many years to come. It's a great hybrid shooter, I love the EVF on that thing, and the dual card slot has been clutch for when I'm shooting for work.
Thank you for the video. I’m both a Sony and Canon shooter but not a videographer. I’m really happy with ma A7RV ( landscape and architecture ) and A1 ( mostly wildlife and BIF ) but also enjoy my A7CR and A7CII as both travel companions and as a backup for the full size bodies. The variety is great lenses is a huge plus. Easy to find a body and lens(es) that fits your needs. Take care.
Loved the review! Thanks a lot! ... I do both product and Nature/action photography so I'm still doubting on what would be the best option, any advice?
Thank you for your insightful reviews, this one was fantastic. I came over to Sony from Canon with the Nex-5N as my first mirrorless and soot landscapes and cityscapes. Upgrading over the years I was sold on the A7R system and have an A7RV. But I also splurged and got the A7CR as my backup. As I have gotten older I love the light weight and combined with a Tamron 28-200 it is the perfect travel outfit. I carry a Sony 20mm for night and wide angle landscapes.
hi :) what is best for picture, not for video, for video all are ok for me, i know how to record on the good way 😄, but pictures is that what i want to buy now,, details and soo.. ?
Thank you very much for this informative video. I was pre-ordered for the Canon R1 after waiting all this time. In short, after 40+ years, I’m branching out to SONY’s A7R V with grip and 24 f1.4 GM & GMll 70-200 f2.8. Canon dropped the ball big time. I’m glad I bought the R3 on discount on the rumour the R1 was going to be around 30mp … SO I have the R3 / RF24-105 F4 L / RF50 f1.2 L / RF135 F1.8 L / RF 600 f4.0 L for wildlife and no I’ll dig into this SONY gear …. Thanks much again.
Hi Matt. Is 61mp really an advantage in image quality over 33mp, other than for cropping? I shoot mostly portraits and family, often with children. You suggested that 61mp is an advantage for portraits. Is there a real world difference in results or is it more a matter of cropping flexibility. Thanks! Art
I went with the Sony A7R V and think I will pick up the Sony A1 ii if they ever come out with it and would be interested in the Sony A9 iii but not going to go with it for the iso and the lower megapixels
I still have my A7RIII - still love it for photo. Thought about upgrading to the A7RV but wonder if that's any good for video as Im now more of a hybrid shooter. I don't like the A7IV at all.
I will have to say not sure. I am using A7R4 right now. For less than $2000 I think if you want a high res camera this is the one to buy, auto focus is still good. A7R3 is still good for most of the shooting it has a very good 42mp sensor. I would not buy an A1 or its replacement, I am more interested in the Nikon Z8. Sony for me is now just a camera seller, they only want to sell their new cameras with very few upgrade, they are now charging for firmware upgrade and they rarely release new firmware upgrade. If I want to upgrade then I will probably go for a Nikon Z8 rather than a Sony A7R5 or A1, with Z8 you get a camera that has the speed and video capability similar to a A1 you loss a bit in resolution for still to both but Nikon has been consistent in providing firmware upgrade that enhance the features of its products. The price difference between a Z8 and an A1 is enough for some native Z mount lenses and E mount can also be adapt on Z mount Nikons.
As I am not making money with photos, but share an enthusiasm for nice photos of travel, hike, family or any events. I have limited my budget to 2k USD. This is where it doesn't hurt too much when putting money aside, I am getting paid for working. A7CII is perfect for me. it fits the price tag, all requirements to shooting photos. And most importantly, it is very small. less weight and less volume to carry around.
Currently I have in my kit: ZV-E1 for casual use/walkabout, A7RIV & A7RV for everything else. More FPS on the Rs would be nice but you can't have everything.
Is still worth to get an used A7Riii with the sony 16-35mm f/2.8 (GM) both going together for 2k??? I’m trying to decide what’s going to be my first camera, and I want one hybrid camera that I could use for at least 5 years, and I will probably be using only this lens in the first 2 years so Idk if is a good choice. (The shutter count of the camera is 21,000)
9:17 This seems to be eyelash autofocus. I thought Sony didn't make that mistake? ;) If I were to consider Sony, I'd probably go for the A7 IV. But it would have to have the A9 III grip.
I just purchased an older A9 I can tell you that this new (old) camera blows me away so I sold my A7R III and Nikon Z6 and Z7 and Im all good Best regards, Rick
Succinct and right to the point… nice video. No dance music behind your voice. Lol. I’m very happy with my Sony stills camera so I’m just looking for video. I won’t buy the FX3 because it doesn’t have any EVF, I’m waiting for the A7S 4… which I think will be their ultimate cinema mirror . NAB is just around the corner so I’m hoping for some kind of announcement.
Could you consider adding the "FF" tag to the title? I am grateful for this free (for us to view) content, I just read the title as including the apsc line-up. Thanks! I'll let the video play for your metrics, I'm not looking at a FF sony camera for now.
..except .... the A7R5 sensor's technology type, not even alluded here to, as so often : ( some good serious reports/studies 'out there". : Many. inherent consequences such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications, and more.) I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip. Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP. I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work. These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
it's indeed somewhat tricky, a7r4 questions. For video and c's I have no insight, but for stills, and for more electronic shutter application types, and for more lowlight applications: I prefere the sensor type of the a7r3 (same as on a7r2) Drawbacks of A7R5 and r4 sensor's technology type, theiy are often not even alluded to : ( some good serious reports/studies 'out there". : Many. inherent consequences such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications, and more.) I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip. Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP. I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work. These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
So are you fully switching ? :) I am concidering the A7 C II / R for size and I/Q , would be better in many ways than the over hyped X100VI. BTW I own the Z9 for 2 years love it! but recently it let me down a bit... The Af tracking for most subjects is great , Eye AF still needs some improvements compared to others as it seems ( by what I see in reviews here on youtube) I used the 135 Plena , granted it was at 1.8 because that's the point of this lense , I was about 13 -15 ft. away from the model. And I got mostly Eyebrow / Eyelash AF rather than Actual Eye AF (pupil). Any advice? tried on forums but I was mainly blaimed for improper technique and I was advised to use pin point AF like a DSLR... which defeats the point of a good Eye AF system , would Sony preform better in this scanario ?
Do you expect a new version of the ZV1 to be released with flash? Do you also expect the release to be soon within two months?? I want to buy a zv1m2 camera, but I am afraid that a new camera from zv1 camera will be released here . I was thinking about the Canon g7x m3 But there are people who do not praise the video. They only say that the pictures are more beautiful than the video. I am confused about my situation. I have been thinking for two years, and every time I say I will wait for the new version.
I went to Best buy to test out some Sony cameras when I tell you the shutter speed on some of these mirrorless Sony cameras are insane but the price tags are even more insane😂 I shop around used but overall impressed
Sony wasn't in the camera business during the film days. However, the alpha line were from Minolta. If you were shopping for Minolta film camera, I'd recommend the Minolta a7. It supports Sony a-mount SSM lenses as well as traditional screw drive lenses. It has a special ability to rewind/fast forward film, emulate STF function for stationary subjects, and unlike most Nikon film cameras, it can leave the film header outside. It also play very well with bulk loaded film like the Kodak Vision 3 which would otherwise be problematic with Canon or Nikon film cameras with automated film winding features.
Got one of the latest and greatest recently, so not really interested in constantly being uptodate with whats up in the camera gear world, I just come here to hear his comforting Howdy folks voice and upvote
Weekness' of the A7R5 sensor's technology type, not even alluded to, as so often : ( go and find out. Many. inherent consequences such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications, and more.) I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip. Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP. I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work. These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
Hey Matt I'm a photographer for our Jail for inmates. If you have a camera that you're not using it would go a long way for us. Much love from the Philippines!
@@holgerkrieg3587time code, shutter angle (which is coming by the end of the year), a body with a fan, extra mounting points, dual sd / cf express type A card slots. Cf express type a support for faster read out, Cine Ei mode, and I can keep going. They have the same sensor sure but if you’re a professional it’s really not a competition. The fx3 is for the working cinematographer. However you can get a lot done with the ZV E1. Just not as reliably.
I changed a A74 for a A7C2 with AI autofocus and it is absolutely dreadful in the autofocus just can’t get accurate focus have to resort to manual focus.I don’t know if mine has a internal problem but I’ve had 6 Alpha cameras and have been in to photography since the fifties .I have had hundreds of cameras video and photography cameras.Absolutely useless camera .Each one I buy they seem to get worse.On my A7C 2 I use the 24 mm G master 1.4 Tried other lenses and it’s the same story.
I can't believe there are $6500 cameras. I could buy an LS v8 engine WITH transmission off eBay for that money 😂 Maybe I should just stick to one expensive hobby.
SONY SETUP GUIDE: learn.mattgranger.com/courses/alpha
Save the State Sales Tax with Payboo - B&Hs exclusive store card: geni.us/payboo
I chose the A7CR over the V because of the size and weight. I chose it over the A7Cii because of the ability to crop even more and get away with just one prime lens.
Why? I want best possible image quality while paragliding and bike packing (sometimes in dim light). Weight, size is obviously a big factor.
The best Sony camera to buy now is a used a9 if you could get one at around US$1500. Stacked sensor, still one of the best autofocus, 20fps (15fps with third-party lenses), very good battery life. It's as affordable as a used XH2 or OM1 here in Taiwan.
Downside: asymmetrical card slots (one of a reason that kept me away from many Canon and Nikon cameras), only 5fps in mechanical shutter, micro-USB port, poor smartphone control compared to models older than the a7R2 or models newer than the a1.
most interesting with Sony line is that their old camera models aren't discontinued and its a bit unfortunate they aren't included here (but I understand that you have to cover new models and it would be too many camera compared in one video if all currently produced options were included). I would prefer A7III over A7IV for example. IMO no tilt screen is a dealbreaker and flipscreen is just horrible to use and improvements in photos dont justify price increase (and I dont do video). I would rather buy A7III and Sigma 85mm f/1.4 Art, same price as A7IV body only...
I haven’t seen you in a while and I noticed that your video quality is so much better now. Way to evolve for the better. Thanks for the video. I’ve been thinking about updating A99.
Got a Olympus OM1 for 1100$ + Olympus 12-40 f2.8 for 400$ and since i use it for hiking/mountaineering on rough conditions on temps like -25'C or climbing i think it was a smart choice going for a tough light system.I could never see myself dragging a Sony A7R5 + 24-70 f2.8 (around 5000$ combo) on this conditions and the extra bulk.The IBIS is just insane so low light is really not a problem for me. Handheld exposure of 2-3seconds no problem. Heck it does really well on astro with a little Laowa 7.5mm f2!
I have zero problems with dragging A7RV with Tamron 28-200 on hiking trips. We live once and all shots you take will stay with you untill you die and possibly long beyond that. Some more weight didt make that much difference but image quality definitely is better, especially dynamic range is huge. More weight is worth it in my opinion.
A7CR user here. I wanted that juicy sensor and a body small enough that I can walk around like a Leica Q or Fuji X100.
Absolutely. I’m having it with me far more often than it was with my A7III
what is best for picture? im focus on picture..
im posting now but is not good quality
im using NIKON P1000 😂😂 that is not for photo quality, just zoom
moon sun stars and animals and some macro, but Sonny is best,, but there are so many types
Many better options in Fuji other than the fixed lens X100VI. XT 5, XT50, XH2, all under $2K with 40+ mp
Too bad its viewfinder is absolute garbage and body didnt really fit those huge FF lenses.
@@Festvangelist Nothing in Fuji is better option than any camera in this video. Autofocus is at a bottom of camera market and a glass is just a bunch of casual overpriced primes for street photography. Everything that costs over 1000$ isnt worth your money in Fuji lineup.
Sony A7CR user with Tamron 17-28 and 28-200, very light very capable kit.
Would be great to hear your thoughts on the APS-C lineup as well, in particular the tradeoffs between the A6700 and the A7IV.
I think Mark Bennett has a video with that specific comparison. The a6700 is my main driver for wildlife because of the 1.5 times crop and 4K 120. If you're a birder, that camera may be a better choice than the a7r5 since that model does not have 4K 120. If you're not frequently shooting at 600 mm focal lengths or above, or you don't prefer a smaller camera, the a74 is probably a better choice with better Ibis, generally better image quality, better handling experience, and many other things. Comparisons of cameras are difficult since we're individuals so I would watch videos on each camera and see which one checks the most boxes. If you have a lot of excellent Sony glass, the a6700 is a high performance beast at a very low price point, but I would rather have the A74 for Astro, landscape, portraiture, concerts, indoor low light shooting, weddings, and travel, but that last one may be better with the a6700 if you have fast APS-C glass and you want to be more inconspicuous. If you haven't already, try watching videos by Gordon Laing, The Hybrid Shooter, Dustin Abbott, Christopher Frost, and the aforementioned Mark Bennett's Camera Crisis. Also, the a7c2 should be considered if you like that form factor.
@@dfusselman What if I do portraits, studio shots and people in their work environment, like fitness instructors, physios etc?
I’m still using A7R2 for stills, the sensor is just so good still, miss the joystick and latest autofocus but i can still shoot 4k video if necessary. Really considering the A7r5 but it sure is a lot of money
Weekness' of the A7R5 sensor's technology type,
not even alluded to,
as so often :
( go and find out. Many.
inherent consequences
such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications,
and more.)
I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip.
Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP.
I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work.
These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
I would agree with your assessment. I own the A7R5. As a general assignment focusing on portraits and events photographer the A7R5 more than meets my needs. Exceptional image quality in a camera that checks many of the boxes that I am concerned about. I believe that the A7R5 is the right camera for the job.
..except .... the A7R5 sensor's technology type,
not even alluded here to,
as so often :
( some good serious reports/studies 'out there". : Many.
inherent consequences
such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications,
and more.)
I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip.
Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP.
I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work.
These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
@@AR-vf7vg everyone has their own reasons for choosing a camera. everyone shoots different subjects, so it only makes sense that everyone's preferences will differ
Well, I am planning to get a7RV, can I use it as true hybrid??
@@IRFAN-po5sz
(Here at least is a visual clue :
A7RV is among those body-design évolutions
(among the different A-series),
where it"s "top big wheel" is now "double layered".
Thus here, custom mémorisations (any?)
adress/switches either video or stills modes
of these cameras specifically.
Selection of any Custom1, C2, C3 no longer affects necessarily both as tied.
Now, sensor-type wise:
it's design puts it on the rolling-effect prone (unesthetic/transforming distortion effects)
cameras,
meaning, prone/systematic ;
"only" if you have to use it wile in "those many" conditions, where these effectd get triggered. Perhaps never in your prioritezed working environments /situations.
But those priorisations of yours, myself I am NOT expert on the video side, so You have to define elsewhere what categories fall best in line for You, and generally or speciffically .)
@@AR-vf7vg thank you for detailed reply. I want to capture photos and video as a hobby guy of family wedding, functions and birthdays.
A7iii here. Want to upgrade but I know the second I do, the A7v will be released. I’ll wait. 😊
I am shooting while travelling..My first Sony- combo with 3 primes (fe35 2.8 , 55 1.8 and batis25 )and A7r1 was only 1200 Gramm total - by impressive iq- but changed to A7r 3 because of the shutter Shock- and added the 24-105 for travelling- to protect the sensor better- i am happy with that…
The A1 - the best of them all!!!
Used A7 III.
I'm a Canon user switching to Sony A7RV, 16-35 f4 G, 24-70mm f2.8 GMII, 70-200mm f2.8 GMII OSS, 1.4x TC, HVL-F60RM2, CFexpress Type A 80GB & SDXC SF-G 64GB UHS-II
You won't regret :D
@@kevinrtres I'm 62 and I saved up for all my G.A.S. expenses (though it does take some time) :)
@@kevinrtres Nah. I'm just a ordinary software developer - nothing special at all :)
But I'm 62 and I did save up during the years to buy the gear I wanted (be it Canon then and now Sony)!
I thought "I can't afford a Ferrari or a Mclaren" - but I love photography and I can afford the best gear if I can wait long enough and save for it.
Nice to know about your gears. In terms of video are you satisfied with a7RV, I mean are you using it as hybrid cam please ?
Don't do it you'll regret it
For me i am primarily a wedding and real-estate photographer and i do some video as well also i do drone video
For my cameras for fast photo and good video i use the fujifilm xh2s with the new 1.4 primes the 8-16 2.8 for indoor video and wide shots of the event halls and the 80mm 2.8 macro for the ring shots and any other detailed close up photos i need
And for low light photos portrait some product shots on occasion and for real-estate stills i use my gfx 100s with the 50mm 3.5 for group photos and portraits and i use the tilt shift lenses for the real-estate stills
Fuji colors are extraordinary
Thank you for the breakdown of these cameras. From the photography perspective point of view, I would breakdown even more on the shutter noise level which extremely few people actually mentions yet an extremely important topic in real life camera usage.
As an event photographer, the A7 IV and A7R V's noisy mechanical curtain shutters (~3.5ms) both got quiet a few BIG eye rolls and official complains in many events and locations I had photographed that involves both flash and artificial/indoor lighting photography. Both cameras can not operate the flash without the mechanical shutter curtain and the silent electronic shutter does not have the Anti-Flicker feature to operate without getting bending effect in indoor artificial lighting conditions due to their slow sensor readout speeds at ~66ms for A7 IV and ~99ms for A7R V unless the facility has invested in high quality LED lights. On the other hand, the A1 and A9 III both have fast silent electronic sensor read out at ~3.8ms for A1 and ~0.0ms for A9 III that can activate the Anti-Flicker/Variable Anti-Flicker feature to operate flashes at 1/200s or 1/250s for A1's Full/APS-C mode (1/400s & 1/500s with mechanical shutter) and 1/800,000s or 1/160,000s for A9 III depending on the lens used. Of course when using the silent electronic shutter the mechanical curtain shock vibration is eliminated as well as no mechanical actuation count or ware and tare are involved with the mechanical shutter mechanism system which also product cleaner images with higher resell value when upgrading. These are amazing useful features that many owner like me found out too late after purchased the less expansive models.
I'm seriously considering an a7iv at the moment as i contemplate migrating from my Canon DSLR system. I'm an amateur stills photographer.
The a7iv is affordable (just), has great performance , image quality and sensible file sizes . Sure , i would like the higher burst speed and pre capture of the A9 , but short of selling a kidney , thats not going to happen.
The availability of 3rd party glass and reasonably priced used Sony lenses is a bonus.
A7IV I bought almost two years ago and it’s bonkers good at everything I’ve done so far. Good low light, great focus, just really great!!
Is it ok without the AI processor for auto focus?
Hey Matt. I bought the A7RV when it was released. My budget may have not yet recovered. LOL. And I added the A7CII for street and urban photography. I am a b it lazy and I must admit that I am startled how good the files out of A7RV are straight out of camera when I shoot in Auto mode. For portrait and landscape, the images are really really good.
Matt I appreciate your in depth analysis of all the systems. I've shot with an A7 IV since it was released along with the Sony 200-600. I just recently acquired the Sony 300 GM/2.8 with both Sony TCs wanting better IQ and was blown away! I shoot a lot of wildlife and birds and I found the combo remarkably good but wanted more. Namely better AF. Better speed. A good friend of mine got an A9 III and I observed what it could do. I was impressed to say the least. He has an A1 also and after shooting with the A9 III has become very enamored with it Yes, like many others I always wanted an A1 but thought $6500 for a 3 year old camera was too much considering what else is out there. Well after much thought I just recently acquired an A9 III and an A7R5 and sold my A7 IV. This was after much consideration of my shooting goals and needs and multiple hours of watching videos like yours and many others. I participated in many Sony groups on FB and discussions and the bottom line is, I feel happy with my decisions and love both systems! I did consider the Nikon Z8 but I am so ensconced in the Sony ecosystem that I felt switching would be too much. At least in my case. Well after shooting with both Sony systems I’m excited at the possibilities going forward! The tech and form factor updates are amazing. The IQ is really good with the A9 III and the DR, ISO and resolution issues talked to death IMO are overblown and negligible really. It’s just a great camera hands down! All these changes have to surface in a new A1 II I feel. But when? My friend doesn't think it will happen anytime soon as the current A1 is still selling well. Nobody knows. I’ll have to address that occurrence if it ever happens but in the meantime, I’m very satisfied. Thanks again for all your in depth and informative reviews! It helped me a lot! 👍🏻
… thx for the video, Matt. 👍🏻 As journalist we take the a9 III, best solution for our work. But indeed: We also use the a1. 😉
Can we buy a7c mark 1 over a6700 with tamron 28-200 + samyang 85 f1.4 for photography or should i wait for few months to get price drop on a74 after launching a75
A7rv here with too many lenses currently (trying to downsize inventory). Spent 2 helpless weeks browsing through stores confused as to which camera /hybrid to get……then I found your video here and it made the decision easy…. And also, Sony just kicked in an extra $400 discount to boot on the a7rv.
For me, the A7RV was never an option, as at that time, I already owned the A7S, A7RII and A9. I got the A1 when it was available 3 years ago and now i bought the A9III 2 month ago. Apart from the resolution, it is by far the best camera in the SONY lineup. It's low light AF is even better than on the A1. This matters more, than the lower ISO performance. The sightly lower DR is no issue for my fast action sports and concert photography, as no output media can reproduce more than 12 stops at it best, with printers and displays at around 10 stops anyway. Not even to mention jpg, which can only reproduce 8 stops.
And the a9iii is a better video camera than the A1. It has the best dynamic range in video than any other camera in Sonys mirrorless line. Yes this a a fact that is supported from lab test from CineD and my own personal use from me owning an A1 A7rv a7siii and fx6
I would 100% agree (for me too), had it at least 33MP. Sadly had to renounce.
(BTW I add reposte of mine here ....the A7R5 sensor's technology type,
not even alluded here to,
as so often :
( some good serious reports/studies 'out there". : Many.
inherent consequences
such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications,
and more.)
I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip.
Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP.
I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work.
These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
@@AR-vf7vg For me, 24Mp is ok, as the the GS is far more beneficial than 33Mp. And I still have the A1 and A7RII, if I need more Mpx. Yes the A7RII is still one of the best cameras for high resolution and the price is unbeatable, if you can get one second hand.
@@renestaempfli1071
just clarify for eventual newcomers to sony cameras
..that I meant writing more clearl before; that I still use (2x) A7R2 to best advantages, but also a r3 (aboth models have the same sensor, as you know). I'd however stress that I definitally recommend find r3 over the r2 just only because of the immensely better battery type, and that are interchangeable with all their 'current model cameras'.
(sure, not an issue for setups that allow or requier to bypass the batteries.)
I bought the A7Cr as a travel camera. Ive had the A7Riii for some years and wanted to get something lighter to take on a Europe trip. Ive teamed this with a 17mm Sigma f/4 lens that I love using. All metal construction and a magnetic lens cap. At 17mm I can get closer to subjects than those using phones so can avoid the “someone is in my photo” syndrome (although I am careful to get my shot quickly and move away for others). Great for all those tourist icons I’ve been viewing. I also picked up a 28 to 200mm Tamron that is not as nice to use. I do wish there was a modern 24 or 28 to 200mm that had good optical quality in a lightweight body - and yes give me a magnetic lens cover again.
Still using my A7R4 and loving everything about it for Wildlife and Portrait photography paired with Sony GM 70-200 , F2.8 ii or 200-600 G lens. My next camera would be the new A1…when it eventually comes out
Still use and have 2x A9ii , A7Riii (its still stunning) and my Mrs borrows my A7c. For sentimental reasons I have NEX7 !
I have the IV but the RV is my next camera
For me as an FX6 user the small ZVE1 is a perfect holiday cam 💪🏼 awesome quality
A7iv for mostly sports here. In this application, it should be described as a 6 FPS camera because of AF capabilities. But it has a full mechanical shutter that lacks to the A7cii. I wish Sony wiĺl create a camera with great tracking, 33+ MP, 15 FPS an a vertically tilting screen. None of their current cameras meets those requirements.
Thank you, Matt. This is a super helpful high-level overview of the today's relevant Alpha models. I work in high-end/big brand advertising. I have always been a Canon shooter for my (photo) commercial campaign work but am likely going to make the jump to Sony. Seems I've been slowly been migrating (without conscious intention) for the past few years - FX3 (for indie film projects), A7Cii (for location/tech scouting and personal travel) and very soon to purchase an Alpha pro camera. I have been considering the A7r V and like you, think it checks all the boxes (for photography). But admittedly I keep eyeing the A9iii... even though there's a significant price jump. Any thought on the older A9ii or would you still rather go for the A7r V? Thank you!
This video sounds a lot like a comment I made on one of your previous videos. I have the RX100vii, the new a7Cii (I ordered it the day it was announced) and the a7Riv, and I think that covers my Travel and Portrait photography quite well.
What you have for video purposes please ?
@@IRFAN-po5sz I don’t do video
Still quite delighted with the A71V. Meets my 'needs' and is a great 'all-rounder'
I do a lot of sports and wildlife, getting into sony this year I got a 200-600 and a a9 ver 1 used and it is a great setup for my needs, still getting used to the focus and tracking system..
I'm very happy with my a7IV, and while the market has changed a bit over the past few years, I haven't been tempted to upgrade at all. The larger sensor and more versatile screen on the a7RV may have come close to tempting me, but I intend to use the a7IV for many years to come. It's a great hybrid shooter, I love the EVF on that thing, and the dual card slot has been clutch for when I'm shooting for work.
Just the right video for me.
Just sold my Fujifilm X-T3 as my workhorse for years, this year looking for my first ever full frame camera.
A7cii won’t disappoint
Thank you for the video. I’m both a Sony and Canon shooter but not a videographer. I’m really happy with ma A7RV ( landscape and architecture ) and A1 ( mostly wildlife and BIF ) but also enjoy my A7CR and A7CII as both travel companions and as a backup for the full size bodies. The variety is great lenses is a huge plus. Easy to find a body and lens(es) that fits your needs. Take care.
Loved the review! Thanks a lot! ... I do both product and Nature/action photography so I'm still doubting on what would be the best option, any advice?
I was looking for an overall comparison and buying guide, thank God, I found this after many tries! Best, on point! Thank you!
Thank you for your insightful reviews, this one was fantastic. I came over to Sony from Canon with the Nex-5N as my first mirrorless and soot landscapes and cityscapes. Upgrading over the years I was sold on the A7R system and have an A7RV. But I also splurged and got the A7CR as my backup. As I have gotten older I love the light weight and combined with a Tamron 28-200 it is the perfect travel outfit. I carry a Sony 20mm for night and wide angle landscapes.
What lens would you recommend for the R5 for portrait and scenery ?
hi :)
what is best for picture, not for video, for video all are ok for me, i know how to record on the good way 😄, but pictures is that what i want to buy now,, details and soo.. ?
Thank you very much for this informative video.
I was pre-ordered for the Canon R1 after waiting all this time. In short, after 40+ years, I’m branching out to SONY’s A7R V with grip and 24 f1.4 GM & GMll 70-200 f2.8.
Canon dropped the ball big time. I’m glad I bought the R3 on discount on the rumour the R1 was going to be around 30mp …
SO I have the R3 / RF24-105 F4 L / RF50 f1.2 L / RF135 F1.8 L / RF 600 f4.0 L for wildlife and no I’ll dig into this SONY gear …. Thanks much again.
Hi Matt. Is 61mp really an advantage in image quality over 33mp, other than for cropping? I shoot mostly portraits and family, often with children. You suggested that 61mp is an advantage for portraits. Is there a real world difference in results or is it more a matter of cropping flexibility. Thanks! Art
I went with the Sony A7R V and think I will pick up the Sony A1 ii if they ever come out with it and would be interested in the Sony A9 iii but not going to go with it for the iso and the lower megapixels
You blanked the 60mp sensor of the R IV?
I still have my A7RIII - still love it for photo. Thought about upgrading to the A7RV but wonder if that's any good for video as Im now more of a hybrid shooter. I don't like the A7IV at all.
super helpful thank you
I have a sony zve10 , so what's the best camera upgrade???
I will have to say not sure. I am using A7R4 right now. For less than $2000 I think if you want a high res camera this is the one to buy, auto focus is still good. A7R3 is still good for most of the shooting it has a very good 42mp sensor. I would not buy an A1 or its replacement, I am more interested in the Nikon Z8. Sony for me is now just a camera seller, they only want to sell their new cameras with very few upgrade, they are now charging for firmware upgrade and they rarely release new firmware upgrade. If I want to upgrade then I will probably go for a Nikon Z8 rather than a Sony A7R5 or A1, with Z8 you get a camera that has the speed and video capability similar to a A1 you loss a bit in resolution for still to both but Nikon has been consistent in providing firmware upgrade that enhance the features of its products. The price difference between a Z8 and an A1 is enough for some native Z mount lenses and E mount can also be adapt on Z mount Nikons.
As I am not making money with photos, but share an enthusiasm for nice photos of travel, hike, family or any events. I have limited my budget to 2k USD. This is where it doesn't hurt too much when putting money aside, I am getting paid for working. A7CII is perfect for me. it fits the price tag, all requirements to shooting photos. And most importantly, it is very small. less weight and less volume to carry around.
Currently I have in my kit: ZV-E1 for casual use/walkabout, A7RIV & A7RV for everything else. More FPS on the Rs would be nice but you can't have everything.
Is still worth to get an used A7Riii with the sony 16-35mm f/2.8 (GM) both going together for 2k???
I’m trying to decide what’s going to be my first camera, and I want one hybrid camera that I could use for at least 5 years, and I will probably be using only this lens in the first 2 years so Idk if is a good choice.
(The shutter count of the camera is 21,000)
Still happy with my A7R3, I would also probably go for the A7R5, because of the joystick for better glove use in rainy or cold weather
9:17 This seems to be eyelash autofocus. I thought Sony didn't make that mistake? ;)
If I were to consider Sony, I'd probably go for the A7 IV. But it would have to have the A9 III grip.
I just purchased an older A9
I can tell you that this new (old) camera blows me away so I sold my A7R III and Nikon Z6 and Z7 and Im all good
Best regards, Rick
Enjoy!!
Succinct and right to the point… nice video. No dance music behind your voice. Lol. I’m very happy with my Sony stills camera so I’m just looking for video. I won’t buy the FX3 because it doesn’t have any EVF, I’m waiting for the A7S 4… which I think will be their ultimate cinema mirror . NAB is just around the corner so I’m hoping for some kind of announcement.
Sir the video was very informative.I need a best video clarity camera which one would you suggest me please 🙏
What do you mean by clarity? What video format and frame rate you need?
Sharp and crispy footage I wana have so which camera and lens can you sgst ?
Sony A7RV with 35-150 tamron + 14-24 sigma art
I do have the a7r4 with my holyTrinity Lens variant: Sigma art 20mm f1.4 dg dn, Tamron 35-150 2-2.8, Tamron 150-500
@@sebastianspk.fotografie great combination.
Got the a7r4a and a7rV and just got rid of the Sony trinity GMs for the sigmas
Could you consider adding the "FF" tag to the title? I am grateful for this free (for us to view) content, I just read the title as including the apsc line-up.
Thanks!
I'll let the video play for your metrics, I'm not looking at a FF sony camera for now.
I agree with the conclusion about Sony's range and pricing.
I'm still rocking the OG A9 😁
I’m sorry but the a6700 belongs on this as well in my opinion. That camera is definitely a big bang for your money.
Great camera. I was only looking at full frame here though
My hunch is that the A7V (hopefully this year) will be the best overall value for your $$$.
..except .... the A7R5 sensor's technology type,
not even alluded here to,
as so often :
( some good serious reports/studies 'out there". : Many.
inherent consequences
such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications,
and more.)
I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip.
Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP.
I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work.
These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
Where would the A7R IVa be on here? I am seeing ones used for the same prices as new A7c II and A7 IV.
it's indeed somewhat tricky, a7r4 questions. For video and c's I have no insight,
but for stills, and for more electronic shutter application types, and for more lowlight applications: I prefere the sensor type of the a7r3 (same as on a7r2)
Drawbacks of A7R5 and r4 sensor's technology type,
theiy are often not even alluded to :
( some good serious reports/studies 'out there". : Many.
inherent consequences
such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications,
and more.)
I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip.
Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP.
I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work.
These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
So are you fully switching ? :)
I am concidering the A7 C II / R for size and I/Q , would be better in many ways than the over hyped X100VI.
BTW
I own the Z9 for 2 years love it! but recently it let me down a bit...
The Af tracking for most subjects is great , Eye AF still needs some improvements compared to others as it seems ( by what I see in reviews here on youtube)
I used the 135 Plena , granted it was at 1.8 because that's the point of this lense , I was about 13 -15 ft. away from the model.
And I got mostly Eyebrow / Eyelash AF rather than Actual Eye AF (pupil).
Any advice? tried on forums but I was mainly blaimed for improper technique and I was advised to use pin point AF like a DSLR... which defeats the point of a good Eye AF system , would Sony preform better in this scanario ?
No, I didn’t suggest I was even partially switching
Considering a used a1 or a RV
Can’t believe my a7cii has better evf than the a7cr in 2024! was considering it but i guess need to get the a7rv
Do you expect a new version of the ZV1 to be released with flash? Do you also expect the release to be soon within two months?? I want to buy a zv1m2 camera, but I am afraid that a new camera from zv1 camera will be released here . I was thinking about the Canon g7x m3 But there are people who do not praise the video. They only say that the pictures are more beautiful than the video. I am confused about my situation. I have been thinking for two years, and every time I say I will wait for the new version.
No I don’t expect that
Hello. Does A7 R V shoot 10 fps in RAW?
That’s a qn for google
i own the A7Rv because of its autofocus and it video and photo capabilities
Are you happy with videos capabilities please ?
@@IRFAN-po5sz absolutely, it does the job
I just got the a7iv coming from nikon d600.
I went to Best buy to test out some Sony cameras when I tell you the shutter speed on some of these mirrorless Sony cameras are insane but the price tags are even more insane😂 I shop around used but overall impressed
which film cameras do sony make please Matt ???
Go for the ZV-E1, that’s the best video camera for the money
Sony wasn't in the camera business during the film days. However, the alpha line were from Minolta. If you were shopping for Minolta film camera, I'd recommend the Minolta a7. It supports Sony a-mount SSM lenses as well as traditional screw drive lenses. It has a special ability to rewind/fast forward film, emulate STF function for stationary subjects, and unlike most Nikon film cameras, it can leave the film header outside. It also play very well with bulk loaded film like the Kodak Vision 3 which would otherwise be problematic with Canon or Nikon film cameras with automated film winding features.
@@shang-hsienyang1284 ahhh!!! You meant really film cameras 😃
@@shang-hsienyang1284 but you’re right, in that case I would go for MINOLTA 🤩
Bought a a7siii
Got one of the latest and greatest recently, so not really interested in constantly being uptodate with whats up in the camera gear world, I just come here to hear his comforting Howdy folks voice and upvote
I'm currently taking photos and videos with the Sony a7II
Thank you so much
Awesome video man thank you!
I'm a theater photographer, and I'm super excited to use the a9iii. LED flicker stinks and I'm just tired of it.
The a7RIII: Hold my beer 💪
Weekness' of the A7R5 sensor's technology type,
not even alluded to,
as so often :
( go and find out. Many.
inherent consequences
such as most prone to banding, least versatile for electronic(silent) shooting applications,
and more.)
I took a7r5 over the A1 because it is too expensive and without monitor's vertical-flip.
Or I'd choosen the A93 had it say 33MP.
I keep A7r2 despite their other (bad) battery type, and same sensor a7r3 : for my not-af-requiring work.
These can btw be found second hand mint condition ..."4 for 1" (one per lens...), a best option sometimes for even most critical work and that many forget
The A7iv can do everything you need to do properly right now
I still use my Nikon D5100
I cant understand why the A( III has only a 24.3 Mp and not a 60mp, especially for the eye-watering price tag.
Shooting with the A7R5 when I am in the mood and Q3 when I feeling more casual & lazy
Hey Matt I'm a photographer for our Jail for inmates. If you have a camera that you're not using it would go a long way for us. Much love from the Philippines!
Sorry mate none of the cameras shown are mine - and what I own, I use.
Love my A7iv but that A7cii AI autofocus is outta this world
I shoot A7RV till I bought a Nikon Zf last year.
Cool Sony cameras.
a7SIII is the king
A1 is still
ZV-E1- I need ridiculously good lowlight video but I don't have $3000+
Instead of the FX-3 I would recommend the ZV-E1, which is basically a FX-3 but at a much better price point.
They share a sensor, but the user experience is very different
@@mattgranger Hi Matt, but the ZV-E1 has the latest AI AF Chip from the a7r V, which the RX-3 doesn’t have.
Yep
@@holgerkrieg3587time code, shutter angle (which is coming by the end of the year), a body with a fan, extra mounting points, dual sd / cf express type A card slots. Cf express type a support for faster read out, Cine Ei mode, and I can keep going. They have the same sensor sure but if you’re a professional it’s really not a competition. The fx3 is for the working cinematographer. However you can get a lot done with the ZV E1. Just not as reliably.
I changed a A74 for a A7C2 with AI autofocus and it is absolutely dreadful in the autofocus just can’t get accurate focus have to resort to manual focus.I don’t know if mine has a internal problem but I’ve had 6 Alpha cameras and have been in to photography since the fifties .I have had hundreds of cameras video and photography cameras.Absolutely useless camera .Each one I buy they seem to get worse.On my A7C 2 I use the 24 mm G master 1.4 Tried other lenses and it’s the same story.
Yikes
RX1?? Mostly kidding, but still😜
Not an alpha :)
@@mattgranger Ooh. My bad🤣 I thought it was just full frame Sony's. Sorry, haha!
Buy a a7ii for 800 dollars and put your money into Sigma Primes.
I can't believe there are $6500 cameras.
I could buy an LS v8 engine WITH transmission off eBay for that money 😂
Maybe I should just stick to one expensive hobby.
This guy? Since when are cameras guys?