yes but being agnostic is bit wrong, like if you think god can be and cannot be doesnt that mean u are still in that loop only, that "seaker" loop. Atheism is good like if it is proved then i will accept else not. Other wise i can be agnostic of any thing a tea pot revolving jupiter, it might or might not. Just a thought.
But is that a thing to be proud of? I mean people write "proud to be communist / libertarian /Islamist /Hindutva / Christian right" everything. While it's true that being a vocal atheist is very much difficult to a religious nation like India (kudos to your bravery, struggles for being an atheist).... but is that a thing to be proud of? Ideally in a free society and democracy everyone must be allowed to be anything until and unless it's under the rule of law and constitunional morality (not public morality). But I guess being any kind of "ist" or following any kind of "ism" is not a thing to be proud of.
@@combinatorics1224 People can be proud of anything they like. An "-ism" is there in pretty much anything, looked at philosophically. Even what you stand for can be described as "apoliticism" or "non-ism". So, chill out.
I really need to quote Karl Marx here "Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it." Loved your new set up Keep it up . Full suppot to you vimoh❤❤
🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00 *📖 Definition of Definitions* - Definitions are important for communication and understanding. 01:20 *🔈 Evolution of Podcasting* - Podcasting originated from RSS feeds and evolved into various distribution methods. 02:57 *🌐 Changing Definitions over Time* - Definitions change with time and context, reflecting societal norms. 04:48 *🤔 Interpretation of Religious Terms* - Religious terms like "religion" and "atheism" have broad nominal definitions in modern times. 06:06 *🥋 Definition of Atheism* - Discusses the academic and real-world definitions of atheism. - Gives examples of different contexts where atheism can be defined differently. - Contrasts street-level fights with tournament fights to explain diverse perspectives on atheism. 07:24 *🌍 Varied interpretations of God* - Highlights the diverse definitions and beliefs regarding the concept of God. - Emphasizes the subjective nature of defining God based on individual experiences. - Mentions different religious traditions and their views on the nature of God. 09:24 *🤔 Academic Definitions and Beliefs* - Explores the debate between academic definitions and personal beliefs about God. - Reflects on how cultural backgrounds influence people's perceptions of God. - Raises awareness about the complexity of defining God and atheism in different contexts. 11:54 *🤔 Understanding the role of religion in society* - Conversations needed to understand where religion is accepted vs. not - Real-life scenarios essential to grasp the challenges people face - Merely passing exams based on classroom training may not provide real-world skills 12:35 *💬 Importance of evolving the definition of religion* - Religious discussions often occur in homes and families, not just based on academic definitions - Encouraging conversations beyond strict academic definitions is crucial - Adhering to outdated models of religious discussion limits understanding 13:48 *🧐 Real-world vs. academic discussions on religion* - Importance of seeking diverse perspectives on concepts like Atheism and religion - Definitions of concepts like God may vary and are not restricted to academic definitions - Understanding religious and philosophical concepts goes beyond traditional academic boundaries Made with HARPA AI
It's my opinion that - आस्तिक नास्तिक का वेद प्रमाण से कोई लेना देना नई है आस्तिक और नास्तिक मोक्ष-निर्वाण -समाधि लक्ष्य की प्राप्ति के संदर्भ में चिंहित करने के लिए होता है , आस्तिक संस्कृति के शब्द "आसक्ति" से आता है , यह की आप किस पे आसक्त है dependent है attached है निर्भर है जैसे ईश्वर, शास्त्र,गुरु , और नास्तिक शब्द इसका उल्टा है ना-आसक्त "नास्तिक" non dependent,non attached in pursuit of मोक्ष-निर्वाण-समाधि aur शुद्ध असली नास्तिक भू मंडल पे ek hi hue buddha kyunki उन्होंने कोई डिपेंडेंसी नई रखी न ईश्वर , आत्मा , गुरु महावीर भी आधे नास्तिक है क्युकी वो पुराने तीर्थंकर और आत्मा को मानते थे
The famous Quote from Neil deGrasse Tyson “God is either not all powerful or not all good” got me into it and I have yet to see a proper response by believers since then
Bro untill he is not superstitous we have no problem,if he is not hurting anyone and he found peace on those such things no problem,mein khud Zen meditation music sunta hun @@TheRationalBhim
This is spot on. We need to understand that words can have different usages among different linguistic communities. It is not a mistake to use a word differently from how it is used in academia. Ultimately what matters is that you clarify what you mean by your terms and if a term is widely used by many people then it is perfectly fine to use the word.
@@Shatranjshersha He popped up on my feed when he did a podcast with Chal Baat Kar. He calls himself Hindu Agnostic and makes 'debunk" videos on Vimoh mostly on Instagram
Hey Vimoh, this new desk lacks character as of what it is RN (compared to your old setup), TBH. The empty shelves can be filled with a few books, plants, etc. The camera angle should be adjusted, maybe looking down from a slightly higher angle. Keep yourself away from the middle of the screen (try the rule of thirds, for a setup like this, maybe?). Leave some space above your head, and also hide the desk if you don't have foreground objects like a keyboard and a mouse there. Leave some space behind you, like a meter away from the wall behind you. Also, half-sleeved tees would look better on you. Just my 2 cents. Good luck with the changes you're bringing.🤞
have you ever truly immersed yourself in Osho's teachings? I suggest listening to at least 100-200 of his discourses. It would be fascinating to see how your arguments hold up after that. Debating with those who haven't experienced the "ultimate truth" is naturally easier. True enlightenment, or Moksha, transcends logical debate and is difficult to convey through argument alone. For a normal logical person, explaining or proving the existence of "God/Brahma/ultimate truth/pure consciousness" through logic is extremely challenging. For a meaningful discussion, consider engaging with someone who has attained enlightenment. Without such an experience, understanding the "ultimate truth" remains elusive. Additionally, don’t draw conclusions from just a few videos or discourses. Dive deeply into the complete works of J. Krishnamurti and Osho. Study their lifetime work directly from their audiobooks and books, not just through secondhand interpretations.
Sir one suggestion from your student who is me. Pls keep some books which you wanna recommend your followers to read and grow their mind .. keep growing sir well wishes ❤❤
I learn the changing definition through space. Like for a celestial body to be classified as a planet it must have following characteristics: 1. Spherical shape 2. Orbits a star 3. Has clear orbital path (pluto fails here) But all these 3 is also satisfied by Binary stars revolving around centre of mass. There are also some bodies who are too big to be called as planet and too small to initiate nuclear fusion and hence be called a star. They're k/a Brown Dwarf. Universe is under no compulsion to follow our definition. 😊
I am an atheist, by which i mean , i do not believe in any God of any religion of the world . I try to follow rational thinking and seek scientific explanations for the universe . Analysis is my best friend, and i know that we don't know most of the facts bout this existing universe, but i m not going to buy the doctrines given by any religion or philosophy
What is your definition of atheist? Me being atheist or not, highly depends on your definition. I think the most common definition is "belief in some kind of God"
First video with new setup! YAYYY! Well, I miss the previous setup, how well it was decorated, those books in the background, those comics poster, all that added depth in the frame. But it's changed now, as ALL THINGS CHANGE WITH TIME. I hope this new one becomes even better. (This is not only about Setup🤭😅)
Mera ek sawal hai ethiest hone ke taur par aap god ke hone ka pramaan mangte hain agar isko reverse karen toh kya aapke paas koi esa pramaan hai ki god nahin hai?
have you ever truly immersed yourself in Osho's teachings? I suggest listening to at least 100-200 of his discourses. It would be fascinating to see how your arguments hold up after that. Debating with those who haven't experienced the "ultimate truth" is naturally easier. True enlightenment, or Moksha, transcends logical debate and is difficult to convey through argument alone. For a normal logical person, explaining or proving the existence of "God/Brahma/ultimate truth/pure consciousness" through logic is extremely challenging. For a meaningful discussion, consider engaging with someone who has attained enlightenment. Without such an experience, understanding the "ultimate truth" remains elusive. Additionally, don’t draw conclusions from just a few videos or discourses. Dive deeply into the complete works of J. Krishnamurti and Osho. Study their lifetime work directly from their audiobooks and books, not just through secondhand interpretations.
@Vimoh, I want your view on thoughts of Buddha in general and whether it has any connection to Atheism. If you have already created a video on it then i would like to watch. Please do share if you have one.
It's a good one setup, but i would recommend you to have a setup like before or like a ancestral background... Choice is yours man i only need best words to consume it can be from anywhere...
Maybe it's my imagination but I think that Vimoh has given an indirect reply to those philosophy students who are criticising Vimoh's stance saying that agnostism Atheism is illogical.
Simply put meaning of words come from its collective usage. If you wish to redefine a word, you'll have to first convince everybody else of your new definition to use it the way you wish it to use in your conversation.
if i were to summarise, "a descriptive model of reality is more empathetic than a prescriptive model". definitions and labels are important only for the purposes of prediction. if our predictions fail, even in a single case, we should realise that our definitions aren't complete.
किसी भी चीज का पूर्ण पर्यायवाची शब्द या व्याख्या समय के साथ जरूरत के हिसाबसे बदलते रहते हैं आज के समय के हिसाब से नास्तिक ता एक ही व्याख्या हो सकती है वह वास्तववादी है अपने कान आंख दिमाग खुला रखकर जीने वाले लोग
He from whom this creation arose, he may uphold it, or he may not (no one else can); he who is its superintendent in the highest heaven, he assuredly knows, or if he knows not (no one else does) - Creation Hymn Of RigVeda
Aap bol rahe ho ki definitions perfect nahi hote aur time ke saath change hote rehte hain. Lekin ye approach bahut confusing ho sakti hai. Agar har koi apna khud ka definition use karega to communication mein problem aayegi. Academic definitions ka maqsad ye hai ki sabko ek common ground mile jahan pe discussion ho sake. Aap keh rahe ho ki real life mein ye work nahi karta, par agar hum sab alag-alag definitions use karenge to sahi debate kaise hogi? Aap atheism aur religion ke bare mein baat kar rahe ho. Par agar in words ke clear meaning nahi honge to log apne hisaab se inhe use karenge aur mess ban jayega. Haan, real life complicated ho sakti hai, par iska matlab ye nahi ki hum standard definitions ko ignore kar dein. In definitions ka maqsad hai ki conversation ko ek shape mile aur log ek dusre ko samajh sakein. Aapka street fight wala example theek nahi lagta. Society mein kuch rules aur structure zaruri hain, bhale hi wo perfect na hon. Bina kisi common definition ke, har discussion ek mess ban jayegi.
Abe bhai tho karta hai na , Indian philosophy mein atheism ka definition parlo jara believe on Vedas, Idea jaruri hai ,har time cishe change hota rhe ta hain ,o definition bhi kisi ne hi Diya hoga , Richard Dawkins bhi khud ko agnostic atheist hi bolt hein
@@studywithme-dh8iu "Bhai, main samajhta hoon tum kya kehna chahte ho, lekin ye baat itni simple nahi hai. Haan, Indian philosophy mein atheism ka definition alag ho sakta hai, aur Vedas ko na maanna ek tarah ka atheism hai. Par duniya bhar mein atheism ka matlab ab badal gaya hai. Tum theek keh rahe ho ki cheezein change hoti rehti hain, lekin iska matlab ye nahi ki har koi apna khud ka definition bana le. Agar aisa hoga to baat karna hi mushkil ho jayega. Hum sab ko kuch common ground to chahiye na baat karne ke liye? Richard Dawkins ki baat karo to haan, wo khud ko agnostic atheist kehte hain. Lekin unka ye kehna bhi ek widely accepted definition ke basis par hai. Wo koi apna naya meaning nahi bana rahe. Aur rahi baat ki definition kisi ne diya hoga - haan, sahi hai. Par wo definition isliye accept kiya gaya kyunki usse communication easy hui. Agar har koi apna definition use karega to kaise samjhenge ek dusre ko? Main ye nahi keh raha ki purane definitions ko bilkul na badlo. Par jab bhi koi naya definition aata hai, usko widely accept kiya jaata hai tabhi wo kaam karta hai. Nahi to har baat par confusion ho jayega, aur meaningful discussion kaise hogi? So bhai, thoda balance zaroori hai. Change hona chahiye, par aise nahi ki har koi apni marzi se words ka matlab badal de. Kuch common understanding to honi chahiye na?"
@@studywithme-dh8iu "Bhai, main samajhta hoon tu kya keh raha hai, aur haan, maine bhi Vimoh ka video dekha. Par dekh, yahan kuch aur points bhi hain: 1. Haan, Vimoh ne kaha ki 'atheist' word se hum generally non-god believers ko refer karte hain. Par unka pura point ye tha ki definitions itne simple nahi hote. 2. Tu bol raha hai ki bas itna hi matlab hai atheist ka. Par agar tu Vimoh ka pura video dhyan se sune, to wo keh rahe the ki har kisi ka apna version ho sakta hai atheism ka. 3. Vimoh ka main point ye tha ki real life mein cheezein itni clear-cut nahi hoti. Koi bolta hai main atheist hoon, par phir bhi kuch spiritual practices karta hai. Koi khud ko agnostic atheist bolta hai. In sab ko kaise ek hi definition mein fit karoge? 4. Aur ye bhi soch, agar sirf itna hi simple hota 'atheist' ka matlab, to Vimoh ko itna lamba video banane ki kya zaroorat thi? Unka pura point hi ye tha ki ye sab complicated hai. 5. Last mein, Vimoh ye bhi keh rahe the ki academic definitions aur real life mein farak hota hai. Tu jo bol raha hai, wo ek bahut hi simplistic view hai jo real life complexities ko ignore kar raha hai. So bhai, haan, general meaning to wahi hai atheist ka jo tu bol raha hai. Par Vimoh ka point ye tha ki real life mein cheezein itni simple nahi hoti. Unka pura video isi baat pe tha ki definitions ko lekar itna rigid nahi hona chahiye."
Atheist ⚛️ ki aaj tak koi definition hi nahi bani , aaj tak mene koi real atheist nahi dekha 🤣🤣 fir bhi 2 definition hai (1)Indian heterodox school ke hisab se atheist wo hi hai jo aatma , parmatma , rebirth, divine world aur Holy institution of marriage aur morality ko naa maanta ho (2) Aur baat Rahi orthodox school to jo gambling,adultery karta ho, divine institution of marriage ko naa maanta ho, intoxicant substance leta ho aur jo nonveg 🍖 khata ho ....... Use Indian orthodox school me atheist ⚛️ kahte hai
Just think about it Vimoh! So many philosophies: Nihilism,stoicism,existentialism,vedic philosophy of Moksha(dwait,advait,trait),Avedic philosophy of Moksha (Buddhism),taoism,absurdism,charvaka,existential nihilism,optimistic nihilism,spaghetti flying monster'ism⁉️ I mean there are so many,So much Abstract and intrusive thoughts go through when thinking about them......
Dhruv Rathi is not the prophet of Islam. The definitions of Islam were demarcated by their prophet and not Dhruv Rathi. He claims to be an Atheist and engages in unreasonable apology of Islam is annoying.
Ok according to Islam Allah ko nahi manne bale galat cish ko puja kar rha hein ush hisab se o log atheist hai , Islam ka statment hai "their is no god but one allha" so mere ko Dhurv rathee ka claim galat nahi laga sahi hai, Islamic perspective se non muslim Atheist hi hota hai
@@studywithme-dh8iu dekho , Islamic perspective ki baat karna hi bekar hai. Sunni Islam ke according to Shai, Sufi bhi Kafir hain. Fir Shais ke according Sunni kafir hai. Ye kuch nahi Inka hoch poch hai. Isse hume koi matlab bhi nahi hona chahiye. As Atheists, we should not allow any Religion to decide what we are.
Culture is not by religion dude It comes from society Onam has hindu mythology but is celebrated as harvested by Muslims hindus Christians and athiests And there are many festivals in South and northeast are beyond barriers of religion Europe mai yahi dikega Spain there are many public festival which are not at all related to faith
First of all what do you mean by Hindu, Islami and Buddhist culture? The Culture of a Haryanvi Hindu is distinct from a Bangali Hindu. The Culture of a Turkish Muslim is different from an Indonesian Muslim, and the Culture of a Bhutani Buddhist is different from a Mongol Buddhist. As far as Atheism is concerned, I think we Atheists engaging in healthy discussion among ourselves without anybody running forward to tear apart those who disagree with us is our culture.
Mein project satyalok ko ohi bola jo vimoh Bhai ne bola mere sath project satyalok ka batth ho chuka hai banda acadmic philosophy se jada Hinduism ke tera biased hain unhe vimoh ko galat prove karna tha kiun ki vimoh Hinduism ko call out karta hai jo।bhi ho 😴mein batth kar liya unse
Next time somebody recommends me a YT podcast, I am totally gonna go "Um, actually, that wasn't distributed as an audio via RSS, so it is not a podcast".
@@prakhar7652marriage koi bhi ho hai to wo divine concept hi na ,Khud court ka consept bhi devine law school se nikla hai ........ Atheist to immoral hota hai usko court ki kya jarurat uske liye kya achha kya bura , uske liye kya marriage karna aur kya nahi karna 🤷 atheist ko kya fark padta hai isase????🤨🤨🤨
Atheism ka real definition hai jo dikhega usse manenge ,karma ,destiny doesn't exist,mai kisi ka bura krunga mere sath kuch bura nhi hoga since god doesn't exist.This is the definition of atheism. Thank me later
Proud to be an Ex-Hindu ❤
wht r u now
🎉❤
Vimoh won here
Proud to be ex-religion
Wow you accepted Islam
Proud to be a rationalist & freethinker ❤
yes but being agnostic is bit wrong, like if you think god can be and cannot be doesnt that mean u are still in that loop only, that "seaker" loop. Atheism is good like if it is proved then i will accept else not. Other wise i can be agnostic of any thing a tea pot revolving jupiter, it might or might not. Just a thought.
But is that a thing to be proud of? I mean people write "proud to be communist / libertarian /Islamist /Hindutva / Christian right" everything. While it's true that being a vocal atheist is very much difficult to a religious nation like India (kudos to your bravery, struggles for being an atheist).... but is that a thing to be proud of? Ideally in a free society and democracy everyone must be allowed to be anything until and unless it's under the rule of law and constitunional morality (not public morality). But I guess being any kind of "ist" or following any kind of "ism" is not a thing to be proud of.
Ok you're an agnostic atheist but i don't think there's anything to be proud of
@@combinatorics1224 People can be proud of anything they like. An "-ism" is there in pretty much anything, looked at philosophically. Even what you stand for can be described as "apoliticism" or "non-ism". So, chill out.
@@akopayplays Agreed 💯
India needs more people like you sir! 🎉Awesome sessions 👏
I really need to quote Karl Marx here "Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it." Loved your new set up Keep it up . Full suppot to you vimoh❤❤
Fantastic explainer.
🎯 Key points for quick navigation:
00:00 *📖 Definition of Definitions*
- Definitions are important for communication and understanding.
01:20 *🔈 Evolution of Podcasting*
- Podcasting originated from RSS feeds and evolved into various distribution methods.
02:57 *🌐 Changing Definitions over Time*
- Definitions change with time and context, reflecting societal norms.
04:48 *🤔 Interpretation of Religious Terms*
- Religious terms like "religion" and "atheism" have broad nominal definitions in modern times.
06:06 *🥋 Definition of Atheism*
- Discusses the academic and real-world definitions of atheism.
- Gives examples of different contexts where atheism can be defined differently.
- Contrasts street-level fights with tournament fights to explain diverse perspectives on atheism.
07:24 *🌍 Varied interpretations of God*
- Highlights the diverse definitions and beliefs regarding the concept of God.
- Emphasizes the subjective nature of defining God based on individual experiences.
- Mentions different religious traditions and their views on the nature of God.
09:24 *🤔 Academic Definitions and Beliefs*
- Explores the debate between academic definitions and personal beliefs about God.
- Reflects on how cultural backgrounds influence people's perceptions of God.
- Raises awareness about the complexity of defining God and atheism in different contexts.
11:54 *🤔 Understanding the role of religion in society*
- Conversations needed to understand where religion is accepted vs. not
- Real-life scenarios essential to grasp the challenges people face
- Merely passing exams based on classroom training may not provide real-world skills
12:35 *💬 Importance of evolving the definition of religion*
- Religious discussions often occur in homes and families, not just based on academic definitions
- Encouraging conversations beyond strict academic definitions is crucial
- Adhering to outdated models of religious discussion limits understanding
13:48 *🧐 Real-world vs. academic discussions on religion*
- Importance of seeking diverse perspectives on concepts like Atheism and religion
- Definitions of concepts like God may vary and are not restricted to academic definitions
- Understanding religious and philosophical concepts goes beyond traditional academic boundaries
Made with HARPA AI
Thankyou dude ,
Keep it up Vimoh!!❤
such a great explanation ,thanks vimoh ❤
"Two way conversation " exactly what I said to my 7yr old nephew to ask questions in catechism class and not just receive information .
“The real world is not a Kung-Fu dojo, it is a street fight.”~ Vimoh
It's my opinion that - आस्तिक नास्तिक का वेद प्रमाण से कोई लेना देना नई है आस्तिक और नास्तिक मोक्ष-निर्वाण -समाधि लक्ष्य की प्राप्ति के संदर्भ में चिंहित करने के लिए होता है , आस्तिक संस्कृति के शब्द "आसक्ति" से आता है , यह की आप किस पे आसक्त है dependent है attached है निर्भर है जैसे ईश्वर, शास्त्र,गुरु , और नास्तिक शब्द इसका उल्टा है ना-आसक्त "नास्तिक" non dependent,non attached in pursuit of मोक्ष-निर्वाण-समाधि aur शुद्ध असली नास्तिक भू मंडल पे ek hi hue buddha kyunki उन्होंने कोई डिपेंडेंसी नई रखी न ईश्वर , आत्मा , गुरु महावीर भी आधे नास्तिक है क्युकी वो पुराने तीर्थंकर और आत्मा को मानते थे
Very insightful video. Liked the old setup better.
newww setup lesss goooo!!!
love your content
continue grind
hyper support
Bhai background is new ......felt very nice....👍🏻
The famous Quote from Neil deGrasse Tyson “God is either not all powerful or not all good” got me into it and I have yet to see a proper response by believers since then
God is Just and fair, not good.
@@mystiquopulent first prove if the God exists
This will be the STRONGEST CHANNEL ❤
I am religious but i am not the extremist so i can do free thinking without any cap.... I worship Lord Shiva because After Warship i feel so peace...
Bro can you explain that peace...
Bro untill he is not superstitous we have no problem,if he is not hurting anyone and he found peace on those such things no problem,mein khud Zen meditation music sunta hun @@TheRationalBhim
@@studywithme-dh8iu ❤️
@@studywithme-dh8iuyeah
These pseudo hindutva goons are more harmful@@studywithme-dh8iu
Tagda arrugement.but be careful arrugement uthana vimoh dherya se sath and gussa mat karna
Initial introduction is realism and idealism debate of philosophy
Please have a proper debate/podcast with Project Satyaloka. Will be interesting to watch two well read brains going at it.
I do a live stream every Saturday at 8 pm. Anyone is welcome to join.
This is spot on. We need to understand that words can have different usages among different linguistic communities. It is not a mistake to use a word differently from how it is used in academia. Ultimately what matters is that you clarify what you mean by your terms and if a term is widely used by many people then it is perfectly fine to use the word.
Nice debunk of Satyalok word salad
Who's he??
@@Shatranjshersha He popped up on my feed when he did a podcast with Chal Baat Kar. He calls himself Hindu Agnostic and makes 'debunk" videos on Vimoh mostly on Instagram
@@Shatranjshersha j Sai Deepak का sibling
Excellent setup we need only your logical thoughts ❤❤❤
I love how there's a Naruto figurine in the background! Please, could you start the intro by saying some Japanese lines from the anime?
Hey Vimoh, this new desk lacks character as of what it is RN (compared to your old setup), TBH. The empty shelves can be filled with a few books, plants, etc. The camera angle should be adjusted, maybe looking down from a slightly higher angle. Keep yourself away from the middle of the screen (try the rule of thirds, for a setup like this, maybe?). Leave some space above your head, and also hide the desk if you don't have foreground objects like a keyboard and a mouse there. Leave some space behind you, like a meter away from the wall behind you. Also, half-sleeved tees would look better on you.
Just my 2 cents. Good luck with the changes you're bringing.🤞
I actually like this setup, minimal with less distractions.
Sir new setup bahot accha hai😊
Setup is very good.... just put more Antiques...thats it....❤
I am your friend from Kathmandu, Nepal
धरम के किताब सही है ये ईश्वर ने कहा है, ईश्वर सही मैं होता है ये बात धरम के किताब मैं लिखा है। इस बात का कोई सीन है 😀😀
have you ever truly immersed yourself in Osho's teachings? I suggest listening to at least 100-200 of his discourses. It would be fascinating to see how your arguments hold up after that.
Debating with those who haven't experienced the "ultimate truth" is naturally easier. True enlightenment, or Moksha, transcends logical debate and is difficult to convey through argument alone. For a normal logical person, explaining or proving the existence of "God/Brahma/ultimate truth/pure consciousness" through logic is extremely challenging.
For a meaningful discussion, consider engaging with someone who has attained enlightenment. Without such an experience, understanding the "ultimate truth" remains elusive.
Additionally, don’t draw conclusions from just a few videos or discourses. Dive deeply into the complete works of J. Krishnamurti and Osho. Study their lifetime work directly from their audiobooks and books, not just through secondhand interpretations.
Congratulations on new setup!!
Naya set up achha laga. Aap konsa mic istemaal karate ho?
Sir one suggestion from your student who is me. Pls keep some books which you wanna recommend your followers to read and grow their mind .. keep growing sir well wishes ❤❤
I learn the changing definition through space. Like for a celestial body to be classified as a planet it must have following characteristics:
1. Spherical shape
2. Orbits a star
3. Has clear orbital path (pluto fails here)
But all these 3 is also satisfied by Binary stars revolving around centre of mass.
There are also some bodies who are too big to be called as planet and too small to initiate nuclear fusion and hence be called a star. They're k/a Brown Dwarf.
Universe is under no compulsion to follow our definition. 😊
New Setup me mic nhi laga lekin Action figure pehle aa gya hai. Lol. Love the setup tho, it looks more.....classic and proffesional.
sir setup ka to pata nahi lakin last line, ❤❤❤❤ it's street fight
Bro learning talk-no jutsu straight from the man himself...
I am an atheist, by which i mean , i do not believe in any God of any religion of the world . I try to follow rational thinking and seek scientific explanations for the universe . Analysis is my best friend, and i know that we don't know most of the facts bout this existing universe, but i m not going to buy the doctrines given by any religion or philosophy
That's why I want to pursue linguistics, it makes you more open minded and you get better understanding of the society and the world around you.
Make your setup more aesthetic and hire a editor like dhruv rathee have ,if possible . Btw Much love buddy.
What is your definition of atheist?
Me being atheist or not, highly depends on your definition.
I think the most common definition is "belief in some kind of God"
First video with new setup! YAYYY!
Well, I miss the previous setup, how well it was decorated, those books in the background, those comics poster, all that added depth in the frame.
But it's changed now, as ALL THINGS CHANGE WITH TIME.
I hope this new one becomes even better.
(This is not only about Setup🤭😅)
loved the new setup
Naruto in the back! ❤
Mera ek sawal hai ethiest hone ke taur par aap god ke hone ka pramaan mangte hain agar isko reverse karen toh kya aapke paas koi esa pramaan hai ki god nahin hai?
Naya setup badia hai. Nice Baturo
Proud to be an atheist ⚛️ from Kolkata ❤️
have you ever truly immersed yourself in Osho's teachings? I suggest listening to at least 100-200 of his discourses. It would be fascinating to see how your arguments hold up after that.
Debating with those who haven't experienced the "ultimate truth" is naturally easier. True enlightenment, or Moksha, transcends logical debate and is difficult to convey through argument alone. For a normal logical person, explaining or proving the existence of "God/Brahma/ultimate truth/pure consciousness" through logic is extremely challenging.
For a meaningful discussion, consider engaging with someone who has attained enlightenment. Without such an experience, understanding the "ultimate truth" remains elusive.
Additionally, don’t draw conclusions from just a few videos or discourses. Dive deeply into the complete works of J. Krishnamurti and Osho. Study their lifetime work directly from their audiobooks and books, not just through secondhand interpretations.
@Vimoh, I want your view on thoughts of Buddha in general and whether it has any connection to Atheism. If you have already created a video on it then i would like to watch. Please do share if you have one.
It's a good one setup, but i would recommend you to have a setup like before or like a ancestral background... Choice is yours man i only need best words to consume it can be from anywhere...
Yeeeee! New setup!
is this a respond video to projectsatyaloka?
yess
Hi vimoh
What is your opinion on black magic
May be those tshirts make you look younger. By the way that pink suits you 💗
Nice Setup vimoh 🦆
Maybe it's my imagination but I think that Vimoh has given an indirect reply to those philosophy students who are criticising Vimoh's stance saying that agnostism Atheism is illogical.
Yesh exactly
😂😂😂😂
projectsatyaloka?
@@djekoelada9969 I forgot his name, if this is this the guy who's doing a phd philosophy degree in canada then yeah
@@Sanmoh_ytwo usa me rahta hai aur aerospace engineer hai tumlogo ki tarah chapri atheist nahi hai 😂
10:21 ग़?
G ❌
gH ✅
Sir meri aap se ek advise hai aap ke peeche jo curtain laga hua hai us jagah pe ek bahtreen beauty of neatur ki Sean lagaye bohot hi accha lagega😊
What is this new room, new setup, new book shelf?
Great job 👏 👍
Yayyyy! New desk🎉🥳
Simply put meaning of words come from its collective usage. If you wish to redefine a word, you'll have to first convince everybody else of your new definition to use it the way you wish it to use in your conversation.
Decorate your background man. You looks like a rude Teacher 😅
Nice explanation & also nice tshirt 😂❤
Thank you brother
if i were to summarise, "a descriptive model of reality is more empathetic than a prescriptive model". definitions and labels are important only for the purposes of prediction. if our predictions fail, even in a single case, we should realise that our definitions aren't complete.
Too good 👍..keep it up
What is the purpose of this life ? who created the universe, can something come from nothing?
किसी भी चीज का पूर्ण पर्यायवाची शब्द या व्याख्या समय के साथ जरूरत के हिसाबसे बदलते रहते हैं आज के समय के हिसाब से नास्तिक ता एक ही व्याख्या हो सकती है वह वास्तववादी है अपने कान आंख दिमाग खुला रखकर जीने वाले लोग
Vimoh thank you for giving words to my thoughts ❤
Love your work.
Proud to be a Naruto fan❤
He from whom this creation arose, he may uphold it, or he may not (no one else can); he who is its superintendent in the highest heaven, he assuredly knows, or if he knows not (no one else does) - Creation Hymn Of RigVeda
Rigveda is full of nonsense.
Setup is good Vimoh
New setup✨
Vimoh sir please suggest me some books please sir
What is the definition of definition?
What is the definition of what? 😅
Aap bol rahe ho ki definitions perfect nahi hote aur time ke saath change hote rehte hain. Lekin ye approach bahut confusing ho sakti hai. Agar har koi apna khud ka definition use karega to communication mein problem aayegi.
Academic definitions ka maqsad ye hai ki sabko ek common ground mile jahan pe discussion ho sake. Aap keh rahe ho ki real life mein ye work nahi karta, par agar hum sab alag-alag definitions use karenge to sahi debate kaise hogi?
Aap atheism aur religion ke bare mein baat kar rahe ho. Par agar in words ke clear meaning nahi honge to log apne hisaab se inhe use karenge aur mess ban jayega.
Haan, real life complicated ho sakti hai, par iska matlab ye nahi ki hum standard definitions ko ignore kar dein. In definitions ka maqsad hai ki conversation ko ek shape mile aur log ek dusre ko samajh sakein.
Aapka street fight wala example theek nahi lagta. Society mein kuch rules aur structure zaruri hain, bhale hi wo perfect na hon. Bina kisi common definition ke, har discussion ek mess ban jayegi.
Abe bhai tho karta hai na , Indian philosophy mein atheism ka definition parlo jara believe on Vedas, Idea jaruri hai ,har time cishe change hota rhe ta hain ,o definition bhi kisi ne hi Diya hoga , Richard Dawkins bhi khud ko agnostic atheist hi bolt hein
Bhai tu pagal hai kiya vimoh ka pura video suna hai unonhe clear bola Atheist bolke ham common generalise krte hein non god believer ko aur kuchh nahi
@@studywithme-dh8iu "Bhai, main samajhta hoon tum kya kehna chahte ho, lekin ye baat itni simple nahi hai. Haan, Indian philosophy mein atheism ka definition alag ho sakta hai, aur Vedas ko na maanna ek tarah ka atheism hai. Par duniya bhar mein atheism ka matlab ab badal gaya hai.
Tum theek keh rahe ho ki cheezein change hoti rehti hain, lekin iska matlab ye nahi ki har koi apna khud ka definition bana le. Agar aisa hoga to baat karna hi mushkil ho jayega. Hum sab ko kuch common ground to chahiye na baat karne ke liye?
Richard Dawkins ki baat karo to haan, wo khud ko agnostic atheist kehte hain. Lekin unka ye kehna bhi ek widely accepted definition ke basis par hai. Wo koi apna naya meaning nahi bana rahe.
Aur rahi baat ki definition kisi ne diya hoga - haan, sahi hai. Par wo definition isliye accept kiya gaya kyunki usse communication easy hui. Agar har koi apna definition use karega to kaise samjhenge ek dusre ko?
Main ye nahi keh raha ki purane definitions ko bilkul na badlo. Par jab bhi koi naya definition aata hai, usko widely accept kiya jaata hai tabhi wo kaam karta hai. Nahi to har baat par confusion ho jayega, aur meaningful discussion kaise hogi?
So bhai, thoda balance zaroori hai. Change hona chahiye, par aise nahi ki har koi apni marzi se words ka matlab badal de. Kuch common understanding to honi chahiye na?"
@@studywithme-dh8iu "Bhai, main samajhta hoon tu kya keh raha hai, aur haan, maine bhi Vimoh ka video dekha. Par dekh, yahan kuch aur points bhi hain:
1. Haan, Vimoh ne kaha ki 'atheist' word se hum generally non-god believers ko refer karte hain. Par unka pura point ye tha ki definitions itne simple nahi hote.
2. Tu bol raha hai ki bas itna hi matlab hai atheist ka. Par agar tu Vimoh ka pura video dhyan se sune, to wo keh rahe the ki har kisi ka apna version ho sakta hai atheism ka.
3. Vimoh ka main point ye tha ki real life mein cheezein itni clear-cut nahi hoti. Koi bolta hai main atheist hoon, par phir bhi kuch spiritual practices karta hai. Koi khud ko agnostic atheist bolta hai. In sab ko kaise ek hi definition mein fit karoge?
4. Aur ye bhi soch, agar sirf itna hi simple hota 'atheist' ka matlab, to Vimoh ko itna lamba video banane ki kya zaroorat thi? Unka pura point hi ye tha ki ye sab complicated hai.
5. Last mein, Vimoh ye bhi keh rahe the ki academic definitions aur real life mein farak hota hai. Tu jo bol raha hai, wo ek bahut hi simplistic view hai jo real life complexities ko ignore kar raha hai.
So bhai, haan, general meaning to wahi hai atheist ka jo tu bol raha hai. Par Vimoh ka point ye tha ki real life mein cheezein itni simple nahi hoti. Unka pura video isi baat pe tha ki definitions ko lekar itna rigid nahi hona chahiye."
Atheist ⚛️ ki aaj tak koi definition hi nahi bani , aaj tak mene koi real atheist nahi dekha 🤣🤣 fir bhi 2 definition hai
(1)Indian heterodox school ke hisab se atheist wo hi hai jo aatma , parmatma , rebirth, divine world aur Holy institution of marriage aur morality ko naa maanta ho
(2) Aur baat Rahi orthodox school to jo gambling,adultery karta ho, divine institution of marriage ko naa maanta ho, intoxicant substance leta ho aur jo nonveg 🍖 khata ho ....... Use Indian orthodox school me atheist ⚛️ kahte hai
Just think about it Vimoh! So many philosophies: Nihilism,stoicism,existentialism,vedic philosophy of Moksha(dwait,advait,trait),Avedic philosophy of Moksha (Buddhism),taoism,absurdism,charvaka,existential nihilism,optimistic nihilism,spaghetti flying monster'ism⁉️ I mean there are so many,So much Abstract and intrusive thoughts go through when thinking about them......
Druv rathee said in his video that kafir is referred to atheist only
Dhruv Rathi is not the prophet of Islam. The definitions of Islam were demarcated by their prophet and not Dhruv Rathi. He claims to be an Atheist and engages in unreasonable apology of Islam is annoying.
Ok according to Islam Allah ko nahi manne bale galat cish ko puja kar rha hein ush hisab se o log atheist hai , Islam ka statment hai "their is no god but one allha" so mere ko Dhurv rathee ka claim galat nahi laga sahi hai, Islamic perspective se non muslim Atheist hi hota hai
@@studywithme-dh8iu dekho , Islamic perspective ki baat karna hi bekar hai. Sunni Islam ke according to Shai, Sufi bhi Kafir hain. Fir Shais ke according Sunni kafir hai. Ye kuch nahi Inka hoch poch hai. Isse hume koi matlab bhi nahi hona chahiye. As Atheists, we should not allow any Religion to decide what we are.
please make a full video about RICHARD DAWKINS the god delusion 💯
Q- what is atheist culture?? Like hindu islami buddhist culture. Religions have a deep impact on culture
Atheism is a non belief, it's not a belief system
Culture is not by religion dude
It comes from society
Onam has hindu mythology but is celebrated as harvested by Muslims hindus Christians and athiests
And there are many festivals in South and northeast are beyond barriers of religion
Europe mai yahi dikega
Spain there are many public festival which are not at all related to faith
First of all what do you mean by Hindu, Islami and Buddhist culture?
The Culture of a Haryanvi Hindu is distinct from a Bangali Hindu. The Culture of a Turkish Muslim is different from an Indonesian Muslim, and the Culture of a Bhutani Buddhist is different from a Mongol Buddhist.
As far as Atheism is concerned, I think we Atheists engaging in healthy discussion among ourselves without anybody running forward to tear apart those who disagree with us is our culture.
Ok culture religion se nahi ata , budhism ke batth kar rhe ho na o China mein alakh Tibet mein alakh hein different culture hai
Sir koi india me alag se atheist logo ki koyi sanstha hai ??
Is it okay to have your own religious beliefs if you DO NOT force it upon others .
प्लीज ओशो पर एक व्हिडिओ बनाये
❤❤❤❤❤nice setup
Vimoh explains very beginner level...
Best reply to that insta philosopher and theologian
Aukat hai kya iski
Nhi kar payaga
Neem karoli baba parma yogananda...??
new set up is homely
"But academically it is a fruit mom"
- Projectsatyalok after adding tomatoes to a fruit salad
😂hopefully gets the taste of his own medicine...
Mein project satyalok ko ohi bola jo vimoh Bhai ne bola mere sath project satyalok ka batth ho chuka hai banda acadmic philosophy se jada Hinduism ke tera biased hain unhe vimoh ko galat prove karna tha kiun ki vimoh Hinduism ko call out karta hai jo।bhi ho 😴mein batth kar liya unse
@@studywithme-dh8iu usse farak kya padhta hai what he said is right
aapne naruto ka figure piche isliye lagaya hai na taki aap talk no jutsu use kar sako
kisko reply de rahe hai vimoh?
Next time somebody recommends me a YT podcast, I am totally gonna go "Um, actually, that wasn't distributed as an audio via RSS, so it is not a podcast".
Do share with ur friends ❤
im just curious how do atheists get married? like every religion has their different proceedings so what about atheists?
Court marriage...
@@prakhar7652marriage koi bhi ho hai to wo divine concept hi na ,Khud court ka consept bhi devine law school se nikla hai ........ Atheist to immoral hota hai usko court ki kya jarurat uske liye kya achha kya bura , uske liye kya marriage karna aur kya nahi karna 🤷 atheist ko kya fark padta hai isase????🤨🤨🤨
This is surely the reply to Project Satyaloka that I wanted , thank you 🙏
Sir apke views batate hai ki hire rare hote hai
W video bro
Umm.. Live kab kab hota hai? I want to talk about gender spectrum.
Bro what do you think an atheist's goal for life should be🤔🤔
As most religion have heaven
❤
Atheism ka real definition hai jo dikhega usse manenge ,karma ,destiny doesn't exist,mai kisi ka bura krunga mere sath kuch bura nhi hoga since god doesn't exist.This is the definition of atheism.
Thank me later
Mere bhai to wo to sabko pata hai 5 senses hai aur sab religion maante hai isame kya Naya hai ... Fir tum me aur ham me difference hi kaha huwa ???
Who got astrotalk advertisement