They were a great team but I would say united didn't achieve what they should have in Europe I thought the likes of Milan and Madrid reigned supreme during that time. Although juventus lost a lot of finals they were still in so many finals back then
@@jericho9653 They definitely should have challenged for it more. I think personally getting rid of Stam and replacing Schmeichel when Bartez hindered them.
@@jericho9653 He did say premier league team. But to be fair they lead English sides back to being competitive in Europe which was huge for English football.
@@robertpirsig5011 yes well to be fair I think keane was one of if not the best player in the world at his pomp late 90s to around 2003, definitely an argument to put him in the conversation as the best, okay he wasn't the type of player that was going to solo past 4 players but neither was maldini or Lothar mathius and those players like keane won it all. Keane was the main reason united got so many late goals and definitely the main reason united won all those thropies.
@@jericho9653 Don't worrie I'm not one of those dummies that thought Keane was just a tough guy. Idiots under appreciate his technical ability. His passing was so under rated and his awareness of closing of the space in midfield made it difficult for the opposition to hold the ball. But if you need a concrete example of how important keane was to united, all you have to do is look at the period of 97/98 season. United won the league the previous year. Keane picked up an injury and was out of the 97/98 season and they won nothing. The year after they won the treble. His absence was a big reason why they didn't win anything.
I'm not. A United fan so no biast opinion but I would have had keane over Gerrard or lampard any day. Great player great passer of the ball just a proper central midfielder world class
@@User10111 Personally I think there is alot of media bias toward Gerard being a better player than Keane. If Keane was English, do you really think Gerard would have been picked ahead of him. Not likely, and I think if Keane was playing for England we probably would have been more competitive at world cups. Here is a good example of when Gerard played against Keane. Gerard barely touches the ball, Keane bosses the midfield despite being down to 10 men at Anfield. Keane is also in his last season for United. m.th-cam.com/video/MBK3mQcWoa4/w-d-xo.html
![[ ออกกอง ] วัยหนุ่ม 2544 โลกหลังลูกกรง..ทัวร์กองถ่ายหนังใน "คุกของจริง" | JUSTดูIT.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vB--aOkZCpw/mqdefault.jpg)
Jaap Stam and Roy Keane were part of the greatest Premier League team ever!. Two absolute Beasts....
They were a great team but I would say united didn't achieve what they should have in Europe I thought the likes of Milan and Madrid reigned supreme during that time. Although juventus lost a lot of finals they were still in so many finals back then
@@jericho9653 They definitely should have challenged for it more. I think personally getting rid of Stam and replacing Schmeichel when Bartez hindered them.
@@jericho9653 He did say premier league team. But to be fair they lead English sides back to being competitive in Europe which was huge for English football.
@@robertpirsig5011 yes well to be fair I think keane was one of if not the best player in the world at his pomp late 90s to around 2003, definitely an argument to put him in the conversation as the best, okay he wasn't the type of player that was going to solo past 4 players but neither was maldini or Lothar mathius and those players like keane won it all. Keane was the main reason united got so many late goals and definitely the main reason united won all those thropies.
@@jericho9653 Don't worrie I'm not one of those dummies that thought Keane was just a tough guy. Idiots under appreciate his technical ability. His passing was so under rated and his awareness of closing of the space in midfield made it difficult for the opposition to hold the ball. But if you need a concrete example of how important keane was to united, all you have to do is look at the period of 97/98 season. United won the league the previous year. Keane picked up an injury and was out of the 97/98 season and they won nothing. The year after they won the treble. His absence was a big reason why they didn't win anything.
Roy and him both were as solid as rock in Man Utd squad.
Keane and Stam would have definitely got that dressing room going.
Him and Keane made other teams had nightmare
I'm not. A United fan so no biast opinion but I would have had keane over Gerrard or lampard any day. Great player great passer of the ball just a proper central midfielder world class
Edmund Nunan biased
@@User10111 well I'm not I'm an AC Milan fan so no biased opinion here
Completely agree he’s the best leader I’ve seen
@We are all going To die soon! dont disrespect gerrard like that, you couldnt be more wrong about him imo
@@User10111 Personally I think there is alot of media bias toward Gerard being a better player than Keane. If Keane was English, do you really think Gerard would have been picked ahead of him. Not likely, and I think if Keane was playing for England we probably would have been more competitive at world cups.
Here is a good example of when Gerard played against Keane. Gerard barely touches the ball, Keane bosses the midfield despite being down to 10 men at Anfield. Keane is also in his last season for United.
m.th-cam.com/video/MBK3mQcWoa4/w-d-xo.html
He is a great critic and a player of Man United
Both would walk in any side in any era.
Dying breath class defender
Levels above any CB in the current PL
True, he was an absolute beast.
He always had Roy’s back. Watch the old games.
So soooooo true
the accent