PUBLIC SERVANTS That Show No Time For The PUBLIC 🤯
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
- In This video we get a jobcentre in coventry that is showing unlawful signs regarding recording equipment.
we also see a parking attendant who dosent want to engage with the public.
And also a short clip of a new up and coming channel I believe so please subscribe to @trevorjonesreports
/ @trevorjonesreports
let's go and show some support 🐻💙✌🏻💯
www.paypal.me/...
We need more diversity in security guards.
Yea more white ones.
Good point. They mostly seem to be BAMEs who delight in spouting nonsense.
Sue that job centre for discrimination
Terrible society where people think they can tell others what to do constantly... Everybody is the boss of everyone else...
I bet g4s put that sticker up
Even the Filth Stations put up No Filming signs but cant enforce it.
Good job BBA - and many thanks for showcasing my first attempt!
Another feelings police your better telling them to jog on mind there own business end of conversation.
so why did you not go in and tell the tosser to jog on, sort of defeats the object of auditing,
Job Centres call the police make you Guys stop you firming. Time has come for you Auditors to call the police for not letting you firm inside job centre, Which is public access. These brainless bullies need to be taught a lesson.
Job centre looks like they have set there own rules.
We don't get much respect from these people we pay for do we?
We are paying them to abuse our rights! Just think about that.
Always terrorism.
Why not murderer? Why not rapist?! It's such a serious accusation to make...
Another fresh one. No doubt they all are. Great vid, rich pickings at DWP.
Recording in a job centre is nothing to do with G4S.
'Public servants WHO show no time for the public' - not "that".
The reason for forbidding recording at job centres is to protect the privacy of clients.
Big up bare Britain audits bro
3:50 Jesus Santa Claus has came down a rung or two 😂
they need to put which law it is on the notice .
A rulebook states that shades hide the eyes and can intimidate people on the street. They are still allowed for police drivers who might be blinded by sunlight during a high-speed chase. But, unless medically prescribed, they must otherwise 'be removed when contact is made with members of public'.
Respect BBA 👍
That should be ` premises ` not ` premise `
You can see why there is a disconnect,police officer acting like a prick
Print a copy of the policy and carry it with you
"Policy" says you cant, LAW says you can.Tell them to check their OWN policy
lol..... on the premise it says !
Another clueless jobsworth security guard
So G4S runs the job centers now .. what has this country come too
How do you use the QR codes on the boards with no recording equipment?
The job centre is classed as a "Public place" as discripted under Section 33 Criminal Justice Act 1972 and Public Order 1936.
the sgn does not say premises , they cannot spell !!!!!!!
Hi, I'm a subscriber and a fan, of you and audits generally, but I reckon that the manager of the Job Centre, as the person delegated to have control of the property, has the right to restrict your implied right of access only to situations when you don't film when on the property. I'm a retired lawyer, and I do know that one can almost never be 100% certain about the law, so I may of course be wrong! Why do you think you can go in please? I'm very interested.
PS You had every right to see the manager, to refuse you that was outrageous!
Was you sent?
You go love 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Should have gone in to the Job Centre first without asking the dinghy diver for permission.
PTTP seems to be winning the debate in the Job Centres he visits.
And that copper at the end. Embarrassing. Just embarrassing.
He didn't on his video today.
Thats an illegal job centre signage. You can film within a public space
"No filming on the premise"
Well that's a sign you can definitely ignore!
Why?
The main difference between premise and premises is that premise refers to a statement or proposition upon which an argument is built, whereas premises refers to land and buildings owned by someone.
They also declare "No mobile phones" on the printed sheet. How do they police that? As soon as anyone is seen in there with a mobile phone do they get asked to leave?
What a bunch of tyrants.
It needs a court case to change this from these G4s clowns
Basically the dwp say you can record inside the jobcenter but if its being posted to social media i.e youtube you need permission to film inside their offices.
Warning Letter - Unauthorised Filming / Sound Recording in Jobcentres.
Digital Services
DWP continue to embrace the digital revolution by supporting innovation and striving for
excellence in the development of current and future digital services. The aim is to put the
claimant at the heart of those services by encouraging the use of digital media devices to
demonstrate ‘Job Search’ activities. There may be occasions where the Claimant uses their
‘Social Media Device’ inappropriately i.e. filming without permission; posting filming on
‘Social Media Sites’ The following paragraphs detail the laws which support inappropriate
use.
Health & Safety at Work Act 1974
One of the obligations imposed on the DWP as an employer under section 2 of the Health and
Safety at Work Act 1974 is to provide a safe place of work for all its employees. This
obligation encompasses the requirement to ensure the health of staff members is protected as
far as possible whilst they are at work.
DWP Guidance states that filming / sound recording is prohibited in our offices without
permission. Recordings by customers during interviews, telephone calls etc.. This does not
mean that Claimants filming within DWP Premises are in some way breaching the Health &
Safety Act, however, it does mean that in order to ensure the DWP does not breach the Act
itself, it needs to have certain rules and procedures in place to protect its staff as filming /
sound recording can have negative and stress-inducing effects on staff members.
There is additional guidance for staff and line managers on how to handle personal attacks
via Social Media at What to do if you are targeted on-line.
The Data Protection Act 1998
It is not strictly speaking a breach of the Data Protection Act for Claimants to film either
inside or indeed outside DWP premises. This is the case providing the customer is intending
to use the recordings purely for their ‘personal, family or household affairs’. This is a fairly
broad exemption and will likely cover most situations involving Claimants filming inside a
DWP office.
However, if a claimant is planning to publish the recordings via social media or elsewhere
online, it is arguable this action would fall outside of the permitted exemption and the
claimant would require authorisation from the Information Commissioner before he or she
commences the recording. In such a situation, if the claimant does film inside the DWP office
they are committing a criminal offence. This would only be applicable to Claimants who fall
outside of the exemption mentioned above.
Notwithstanding the fact that in most cases filming within DWPs is not unlawful, the DWP is
under a duty to ensure it puts in place sufficient technical and organisational measures to
protect the personal data is holds in relation to its claimants and prevent this being
inadvertently disclosed to third parties. If it does not sufficiently protect this data the DWP is
itself in breach of the Data Protection Act. One of the policies the DWP has put in place to ensure that as a Data controller (organisation that holds and processes data) it complies with
the 7th Data Protection Principle (see below) of the Data Protection Act 1998 is to ban
claimants filming or sound recording within DWP offices. This is the main justification for
preventing Claimants from filming within DWP offices.
7th Data Protection Principle
Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or
unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage
to, personal data
The Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
You should be very careful. You could quite easily breach data protection by innocently catching a computer screen if you then accidentally posted sensitive data, you could quickly end up before a judge. The claiment could even sue you and they would love that until they get their job seekers stopped for having to much money lol