I can’t blame the lawyer. He literally has nothing to work with. All this legal team is trying to do is collect a big check from Heard because they know they have no real convincing defense for her actions.
Yeah, the headlines remind me of 'I was raped by skinheads from Mars'. Since when are tabloid headlines based on proven facts instead of malicious gossip?
Fully. Sad to say that i lost my respect for him when she uploaded those fabricated videos.. but two years ago, as the audio tapes came to light, I realised that it was all lies. If he lost this case, he’s still won his reputation back!
Depp is soooo smart…. Not everyone will notice it but he takes his time answering questions giving his team time to jump in if they needed too. Johnny Depp and his team are GOATED!!!
Man i had zero observation regarding this. I thought he was just looking for answers with those long pauses . This was megagenius and I am an idiot. -Makes sense why couldn't last a month in college-
I as well. And u know everyone in that courtroom especially that jury did as well. At least half of em. I mean come on what a joke of a job her lawyers are doing.
@@samyoungblood3740 I wondered the same thing. Not just for money. But to make Johnny look bad. Omg I'd love see someone come to the stand to say yes I published this tabloid because amber brought it to me ! God imagine if that happens
@@samyoungblood3740 that was absolutely brilliant! highlighting that her PR campaign was beginning in advance once she knew he wasn't gonna OD and leave her everything in the will even if she denied him the detox meds - it was gonna take more to extract millions from him and she wouldn't have him putting the word in to get her extra film roles
@@sagewillowLisa I really believe that this was the hope of the defense, drive him to anger to discredit his testimony, the moment the criminal charges were dropped the defamation case becomes open and shut unless you can sway the court's opinion somehow
Exactly, the whole reason they we doing this, because it would be rightly murdered on re-direct, would be to get him to explode so they could taint the jury.
It's frustrating for me because I know how much lawyers make and you think these people would have the best lawyers money can buy and yet I feel like I'm listening to 12-year-olds just being snotty
Objection. Objection. Objection. Objection. Objection. I think he's trying to reiterate defaming inquiries just to desperately nail in the idea that Depp is nefarious to the jury. It honestly doesn't matter if it's stricken from record or objected, so long as they hear it. The problem is that it's so overt, even a child would see through the attempt at being manipulated, let alone a group of fully functioning adults. Anyway, they're just throwing darts, trying to hit any mark they can. It's kind of embarrassing to watch.
@Keenan Molver Sorry, couldn't be more wrong re lawyer skills. Textbook with some flare on cross. Need to watch some trials. And I say that with respect. 40 years experience here. And I'm in Johnny's camp.
His legal team is solid af. It looks terrifying to be in there being scrutinized for every single word choice, where a simple "yes/no" can change the whole perspective on you. It must be comforting to have your lawyers fully assisting you in avoiding as many double-edged questions as possible and with that much confidence
I was just thinking that. These questions are all the same but with words twisted to try to trick him. Thank goodness for his legal team and for him being able to keep his composure and calmy tell the truth. Also.. funny that Camille was able to get AH to basically admit to everything successfully... because she's sharp as a tack.
Why??? This narcissist blew more money on drugs and booze then most people will ever make! Now he has to sue others to try to support his drug and booze addictions.
Those who experienced what Johnny has, rely on their humor to survive, it’s not that he’s making fun of anything, it’s that he’s trying to bring a little light into the darkness looming over
@@thedeependrap2135 : Some lawyers believe that they gain an overall advantage with the jury by firing many questions at the witness. Even if the majority of the questions get objected to and sustained, the jury will remember the barrage of questions more than they remember that they were sustained. And being forced to face a barrage of hostile questioning makes the witness defensive, and makes them look like they are in the wrong even if they aren’t. It’s a cheap trick, but it often works, which is why the lawyers do it.
Don't let it bother you. He's already won, whatever the verdict it. Nobody believes Amber Heard - and everyone is laughing at her lawyer. Read the comments - all Team Johnny.
It is nothing but comical that these lawyers would think bringing in TABLOID stories as part of their defense is anything but ridiculous. I honestly can't believe this is real.
I don't understand why Tabloids/headlines aren't classed as Hear Say. As its wrote by someone that wasn't physically there to witness it nor did they hear it with their own ears! News stories go by being told something through a second person ie gossip/Chinese whisper.
I think he’s more interested in trying to establish a motive that he had troubles before her article and her account confirms basically all the tabloid trash. When probably in actuality he didn’t care about the tabloids because they aren’t factually based however her article was taken as a factual representation of their relationship. Trying to get him rattled about crappy articles………the attorney is either to dumb or doesn’t know much about who he’s questioning. Depp could care less about whatever gossip is buzzing around town but he does care about his side of the story getting out.
I literally laughed aloud. This man is so sharp and witty.. he speaks slowly and chooses his words carefully and when he does…. Maaan oh man. It’s fantastic. His humor is perfection.
Heard’s lawyers are TERRIBLE, bringing tabloid news articles to a cross examination is completely asinine! Every question was a clear point of objection.
This was deliberate so the jury could hear negative newspaper's storys about Depp to put in their minds, that lawyer knew all of them would get objected and sustained. The news can publish "yellow journalism" if you will because they have little loops like "sources say" or freedom of speech etc
“I am doing things that are true to me. The only thing I have a problem with is being labeled.” ― Johnny Depp. Good to see a man staying true to his word.
Man, the fact that her lawyers "heresay"ed so much of what Johnny said and then have the nerve to bring up literal articles of hearsay and just read titles is absolutely embarassing
@@lambdaman3228 It’s not about liking it it’s about legal procedure lmao. I mean, the amount of objections sustained in this clip alone speaks for itself. You Don’t consider every angle of perspective when making an objective conclusion. Angles lacking in validity are rightfully thrown away. Literal Tabloid articles have no place in court as evidence. It Is about nerve because the lawyer’s making a ridiculous move.
@@anomienormie8126 > I mean, the amount of objections sustained in this clip alone speaks for itself Does it? The jury was present for all of those questions. Regardless of if JD answered the questions, the jury saw and heard each question, left unanswered, and all and the implication of it. You say it speaks for itself and I agree, but I think it's speaking different things to each of us. I see it as a brilliant legal strategy to plant thoughts into the jury's mind. I don't think it will work, but I think they have a weak defense anyway so props to them for trying something. > You Don’t consider every angle of perspective when making an objective conclusion. Yes, you do. > Angles lacking in validity are rightfully thrown away. Yes, but you have to consider them to determine if they are valid or not, hence you consider the totality of angles. > Literal Tabloid articles have no place in court as evidence. In a defamation case they absolutely do have a place. Tabloids are where fame or "defamation" is propagated.
The weirdest part about being a lawyer to me is how you have to give a pathetic monologue of nothingness as a last ditch to win while everyone including you know it’s absolutely insanity
@@XEveryoneLovesEmilyX the question isnt if, but how you attempt to defend somebody is here what's interesting. I think he comes of veery dislikable with his lame attacks ad hominem throughout the case.
I never thought I'd see the day where tabloid articles are brought into legal court proceedings. What a world. They really putting lawyer's rep to risk
Hence; *Tabloid* And they stated it themselves. I don’t get how the Judge let them go through with it because they’re assumption articles, or in this case “hearsay”. It’s all hearsay and they’ve been going more than 6 weeks. Americas justice system is cheeks.
Johnny's little quips in between reading each of the false publication headlines were strangely satisfying. "You read that very, very well." WHAT A LEGEND.
My brain is melting at the fact that this lawyer very seriously thought it would be effective to use tabloid articles against Depp. I cannot believe what I just witnessed
whats more bothering is that the court allows the use of reading tabloid news as evidence or whatever, really newspapers in court from some punk ass journalist ?
I find it insulting toward the jurees to think them so dumb that they would believe blindly tabloids "tease tittles" and that wouls be enought to influence them in a serious court case. And for a lawyer to use tabloids to counter DEFFAMATION trial (guys seriously lol). Amber Heard at best have bi polar disorders or at worst is a narcissic pervert manipulator. Either need treatment and to be estrained from coming close EVER to Johnny Depp or any memeber of his relatives. Cause she clearly have an obsession against him. When money isn't your interest (wich is not her case obviously) you just brake up with the person and never want to have anything to do with it. You don't try to destroy his image or his reputation.
it is a SUPER common trick in courts to re-read yellow (also known as fictional or sci-fi) press tabloid titles to divert from the punchline that actually misleads the reason why case exists in the first place - in other words an 8-step routine and its old like a roman empire old: 1. read fictional titles - 2. belittle the true reason for a case - 3. switch to pointless reason on the fly - 4. demand to accept that is the only reason - 5. lock plaintiff in a loop by endless speculations - 6. enforce the pointless reason - 7. convince the jury that plaintiff made a mistake - 8. win the case -
Johnny's lawyer is fantastic for letting this guy make a fool of himself without objecting to the tabloids.....everyone knows they make stuff up! The objections are at the perfect moments! Good Job Johnny's attorney!
Its because there is nothing to object to.. The lawyer is asking “did i read that correctly”.. as he is reading an exhibit.. Regardless of how stupid it is.. there is no violation.
Exactly I agree. Any lawyer or judge would see how ridiculous it is to ask questions about tabloid headlines??!?!? Johnny has a great lawyer, kudos to him👊.
This stuff is akin to writing "Johnny Depp is Guilty" on a piece of paper, handing it to him and reading out what he wrote on the paper and asking "did I read that correctly" The sad part is there's enough stupid people in the world that it might even work.
The line of questioning was not effective, but I think what the lawyer was trying to establish was that Depp had already done damage to his reputation before Heard's piece was ever published. That's why he kept pointing to articles that preceded hers.
The purpose of putting the articles from 2016 into the record is not to say they were accurate, but to show that he was getting a lot of bad publicity that could have poisoned the possibility of future roles prior to the 2018 op-ed. The jury might decide his injuries were less than $50 million or possibly none at all. I don't have a dog in this fight - I'm simply sharing why the articles and questions regarding their existence were allowed.
@@kelleyeidem667 maybe but they didn't effect the role he already had in the harry potter spin off movies. Which he lost because of AH's oped. And that role alone lost him millions.
@Jane's the real question is how is this evidence not permissible and even allowed. The judge allows it, even though its all from Ambers publicist. She is crying now about Gavin a personality disorder after years of further abuse just to smear his name after ruining his career when all he did was protect her. No man even gets to be heard like this and it 100% shows how sick the system is.
They keep trying to bring out his "uncontrollable monster-rage" side, but it keeps failing because it doesn't exist. He's just not violent towards other people. That is all that has been shown so far by this testimony and "evidence". Mr. Depp keeps meeting the disrespect and deliberate cruelty with humor, rational explanation, and calm; well done, good sir.
His reaction to the abuse has allowed the jury to witness his demeanor. Thanks AMBER HEARD. Truth prevails and when you display your shirt played out lies for the entire world to not even believe you I think you should be apologizing and thinking of a different strategy at this point. Your STUPID LADY!
@Ululu Kululu well yeah no one else has ever claimed him abusive ,so with others saying she is mean or abusive, then clearly support her.Seems pretty logical.
@Ululu Kululu you are about the only one, this woman is a abuser and did all the same drugs he did, so that point is moot she absolutely 100% has big time mental illness issues
@@XXX3155 Proof of what? That a "paper" published what some "journalist" imagined and wrote down?` Have you ever in your life seen a tabloid headline and then read the actual article and gone "that seems true"?
The way the lawyer doesn’t let him speak is a great proof that he’s not easily irritated and aggressively responding 😌 I would be already mad if I was Johnny constantly interrupted hahahaha
@@slavyori2140 agreed. they tried and tried to provoke him. if he is a violent, aggressive human being in nature, he would have retaliate. hey, even non violent people has limit, but here we can clearly see how calm and relax JD was... it's really against what AH and most media portrayed him. we can check on how JD in so many talked show... he is indeed gentle and a calm person; always in deep thought before responding to any questions and any act...
@@adryaniha459 No, its just about how much youre willing to endure. Someone can be super violent and abusive when nobody is watching and then be a charismatic darling when they are.
I’m embarrassed for the defense. Are they really using gossip and tabloid articles as a defense? Edit: I understand why they did it. It’s just embarrassing to see them grasping at anything they can to paint Johnny into a bad light, no matter the “source.”
That's why they are called Tabloids. They are the reason for Princess Diana's accident and untimely death to many suicides. They don't have truth in them
Her lawyer has nothing else, he is desperate and it shows, he is trying to frustrate Johnny and make him show anger while he is on the stand so he can bring some form of doubt to the jury, in efforts to turn the case in favor of Amber... it's all her lawyer got, he know she is lying, but he is just as dead inside as she is and will not quit, he is just waiting and hoping for a slip up by Johnny or some other witness so the jury can have doubt and he can feed the doubt... I'm happy Johnny isn't allowing the lawyer rush him and keeps talking as he tries to talk over him(if he can get Johnny to just stick to the yes and no answering, with no extra comments, the chances are higher to turn the case the way her lawyer want it, if he cant keep Johnny from saying extra comments, he tries talk over in hope's the jury doesnt hear him). I'm happy that Johhny continues to respond the way he wants..
Throughout this whole trial I haven't heard one iota of abuse on Mister Depp's part. All they have is a bunch of text which clearly a six-year-old can tell it's sarcasm. I wish him the best as well.
Well, unfortunately the burden of proof is on Depp's lawyers. It's a defamation case, and that's a bit more challenging to prove. That being said, even if Depp's team loses this case, it is VERY, VERY clear that the general public is overwhelmingly supportive and sympathetic to Johnny Depp. The public is clearly not buying Amber Heard's attempt in playing the victim. So, when this case is over, if she wins, people will boycott her movies and probably Disney as well, for what they did to Depp. You can't underestimate the power of the court of public opinion.
Respectively, they hey have proved perjury in spades And I'm pro Johnny. The soundman obviously lied. The lawyers told him to say he didn't recall many times re Boston flight. The standard defense to perjury charges as every attorney knows.
So what her lawyer is trying to prove is that she didn't ruin his career in the 2018 article because she already ruined it starting 4 years earlier. Gotcha.
@@Guitar387 I dont think her lawyers are supposed to set her up as the villain this way. Just like them trying to say its okay that she beat him up because he was an addict. That's not a good defense. Them proving she ruined his career on a larger scale than the one article isn't a good defense.
When AH presents her case things are going to get rough. His salvation lies in a full consumption by the 11 jurors of the full, unredacted audio tapes of their fights particularly her visit to him on the so-called Uber recording where she repeatedly returns to taunt and degrade him. He's obviously under the influence but repeatedly ties to help her and shows genuine concern. Civil trials in California do not require an unanimous verdict
So the attorney obnoxiously screams “HERE-SAY” everytime Johnny speaks, but yet here’s the same attorney referring to tabloid and gossip magazines that are notoriously not credible- and this doesn’t qualify as here-say?
I hope the Jury can see how crazy this woman is and what Johnny has had to deal with. He deserves to be happy again and free from this woman and her drama.
Crazy. Is nothing. The manipulation and sheer narcissism is unbelievable. She's playing mind games for the world to see by dressing like him in court as well.
My ex was ) is exactly like that. They think they can actually become the person they're attempting to slander and will slip right into the person that they want to be and are attacking.
I admire Johnny's patience and self control. They had absolutely nothing on him, you can see how they tried desperately to twist the words and context with questioning him exactly those question which proves absolutely nothing. Johnny's face getting more and more p*ssed off but yet stays calm with all the crap.
"Did I read that right?" "Did I read that correctly?" This is hilarious, it's amusing to watch this lawyer make a fool of himself daily. 😅 Love this 'evidence' selection too. Tabloids are such a reliable source of factual information! 😂
I was laughing at first, but realized this is a courtroom, not lunchtime in a high school cafeteria. NOW I’m pissed off! They’re setting a highly dangerous precedent here. Tabloids historically pay people for stories that may or may not be true and publish, completely omitting any fact check whatsoever. How could a judge allow those things anywhere NEAR a jury. I question the integrity of the JUDGE at this point.
Yep all this proves is that Amber's whole defense team have Nothing on Johnny. they are desperately trying to just make him look bad, but that chuckle from the audience in the court when Johnny threw facts back at the Lawyer shows how they all see that the media and defamatory stuff is BS. People today know what the media are all about, they will drag a celeb's name through the mud just for headlines. Any logical person had only got to look at facts when it comes to Johnny Depp's career in Hollywood, sure he has substance abuse issues and drug addiction problems he is "human" afterall, but there has never been a single story even a rumor of anykind of abuse of women, by Johnny Depp. When a movie star is a A-hole you hear many stories of thier bad behaviour over years just like Weinstein. the point is if Johnny was a abuser of women and real A-hole/SOB you would have heard things come out by now especially from his ex wives, Vanessa and Winona would be having a field day by now with the metoo movement. theres been nothing when it's come to Johnny Depp and his exes have been in full support of him that says alot.
@@SabrinaLWilliams “Crisis” , “Allegedly” , “Reportedly” … the lawyers brought this to court?! A male judge would have asked Counsel to approach. If I was presiding I would not have tolerated tabloid gossip in my courtroom. Her Honour is patient.
INdeed. It did not go anywhere. -"Did I read this gossip article correctly?" -"Yes, you did." Apart from the the fact that this lawyer has good reading skills, we did not learn anything from it.
@@RaikenXion He's the one suing her for her alleged "defamatory" article that caused him his job. Her lawyer is showing the jury that he was bust before the article was published. He's pretty effective to be honest with you. I say this and I'm not a fan of Amber.
Why is this lawyer so unfriendly? Is this a strategy? I can't imagine this having any beneficial effect on Amber's side but maybe I don't understand courtroom strategies.
The opposition are always unfriendly to those they are against. At 15, I was ripped into by a grown mans defence. They didn't care. Repeating over, over and over again "you wanted to kiss him didn't you?", "you asked for him to kiss you, didn't you?". I was 14 (Christmas night, 1998) when the incident happened, forget the fact the man was older than my Dad. I was treated like a liar and a bit of a 'goer'. I lost faith in the system when he was found not guilty. I'm 37 and I still won't get into a black taxi by myself. When I get a private taxi, even though they are logged, I txt the ID number to my husband, or other family member.. just in case. EDIT: Sorry.. 38, not long had my b/day.
@@teenybabs I'm so sorry this happened to you... Unfortunately in this world it's often the victims who are blamed for their aggression, and people like Amber Heard who will lie and try to make money out of false accusations, are making it even more difficult for the real victims to speak.
He want to make JD lose his temper, that way he may show he is indeed violent or short tempered even in courtroom. JD knowing this didn't let that happend and paciently answered all the "questions"
The fact that everyone can see her bullying tactics everywhere - even through her legal team, that being through attempted humiliation and berating to try and make Johnny break, is clearly lost on these people.
Tho if you want to disprove defamation its a good tactic. If they show that his reputation was already horrible then they effectively show she couldnt do any substantial damage to it. Its horrible but effective
@@TheRealGrubii The fact that we all look past what people have done in the past. This better obtain to Johnny too. He hurts himself from time to time with his addiction, but not others. There are so many people who publicly have said I used to have an addiction but I don't now. But what does his addiction have to do with not abusing that whatever she is?
I was watching live and I absolutely could not believe what I was seeing. Imagine using headlines of click-bait tabloid / gossip mags written by people who don’t even know the defendant personally as “evidence” to a persons credibility. Meanwhile everyone in his life past and present are more than happy to testify his true character, THAT says more than any hit piece article could ever write about him. Also, notice how no one from Ambers camp past or present have come forward with anything supportive to say about her, it’s all been negative. Which I’m not surprised since she is the TRUE ABUSER.
Johnny's team should get the articles about her hiding being a coke addicted stripper before her failed attempt at modelling and that she actually quietly got Married to Tasya Van Ree who she was restrained, cuffed and arrested for publically beating in an airport in the year before she hooked up with Depp ! get her to read out the cops comments about why they pulled her off Tasya and how she called the arresting officer a homophobe when the woman cop is a long time married lesbian !
@@perry92964 that’s a tactic lawyers use to trip you up. investigators also do it. It’s a low-ball tactic, however and is generally frowned upon in high court settings like these ones. A lot of the times though, they would be let go. Mainly for the sake of a quick proceeding.
Thanks for your utmost love and support has brought me this far, it has been a hard time for me going through this, but your love and support keeps me going and standing strong in this difficult times.
@@amandab3946 The lawyer can say whatever he wants tbh. Doesn't necessarily matter in this case. Johnny's won the people, and we all hear him. The lawyer's won nothing but mockery. I get it though to some extent. Everyone in this country has the right to defense, which Amber is in this case. If you had a defense that intentionally or even accidentally acted against you in any way, well then you've got one hell of an awful lawyer.
This guy managed to ask questions for 12 minutes and not get a single relevant answer o.o That's actually kind of impressive. I'm pretty sure most people would ask a good question even by accident
It really was just the same question but asked in a dozen slightly different ways. All in ways to spin him into whatever warped story they need it to be..
His only tactic as this point is "he was drunk sometimes and did drugs sometimes so therefore Heard is credible". He should not have been allowed to bring up so many irrelevant tabloid articles in this session.
@@jesteredGesture when I was trying for army, they did the same. In that test were 30 questions, but when I got them, i understood, that there are actualy 10 questions.. Fortunately, i got through. But I dont think that, ms Heards lawyer did know what he is doing. Acusations based on gossips. WTF?
He was hoping to use the questions to call for a legal conclusion, probably figured that if he asks enough Johnny and his team would get tired and make a misstep. If I was judge on this case I would tell him that if his next question was irrelevant or objectionable in any way he would be done.
I laughed really hard at that line. It was just so very well placed and passive aggressive but still humorous and in a kinda respectful tone at the same time that it's really hard to be condemned
No, sadly they're all very good lawyers, specifically Rottenborn. What we're seeing here is a guy who has so little to work with that low brow hit pieces are all he has.
@@vsGoliath96 I would strongly disagree that her lawyers are "good". Amber Turd's lawyers seem to be highly incompetent, I would go as far as to say that they should be disbarred from practicing law, because they regularly make rookie mistakes and try to distort the facts.
@@averagegeek3957 Successful lawyers in the USA are "bad" in those exact ways. This is, unfortunately, how cases are won. The "anglo common law" court system is very much based on misleading and confusing the jury. The end result of a trial like this is not finding truth, it is finding which side wins the case.
The fact that 95% of the questions her lawyer asks johnny are objected AND sustained by the judge says a lot about how Amber's legal team does not have much against Johnny.
I believe Mr. RottenBorn is pushing their luck and trying to sway the jury's opinion on to their side by pushing the narrative with all these asked and answered questions despite the objections. their only strategy
@@dante93nero That's a big difference though. Those happenend against Depp himself in the cross examination. He isn't a lawyer and doesn't know the rules, so that's hardly surprising. Having that many questions sustained as a lawyer in a row while asking the questions is not a good look.
I'm starting to believe that after all these comedy short movies Johnny's career will just rise again. He is the protagonist here, carrying the fun and humbly making us see how good and worth respect he is
@@apun9307 not quite on par with the Call of Duty thing that was pulled during Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial. Idc what anyone thinks about him, that was a WEAK strategy lol
Johnny's lawyer is pretty amazing to be honest. Like him, she NEVER loses composure or plays the game Mr. Rotten Born wants to play. In fact I would go as far as saying that both Johnny and the wonderfully capable lady that defends him were Born quite Fresh
"You can't name a single woman who's advanced her career by making an assault accusation." -2.5 minutes later "It is true then that Amber became a public figure representing domestic abuse" I had no idea who Amber even was before all of this. Wouldn't even be able to recognize her.
This is so true.. almost everyone knows the name johnny depp, but until this scenario and trials and all the bs going on, nearly nobody knew the name amber heard, until now, where almost everyone that knows JD, now knows AH
you can t see the jury, they are to the right of him out of sight. It's the gallery behind the lawyers that are laughing....... comon johhny boy you got this❤
When objections to your lawyer’s questions are 100% sustained by the judge…you’re obviously not seeking justice in the legal sense. You’re putting on a show for the jury.
it should be sanctioned as well. if you rack em up like he does, he's just putting opinions out there. Even when he's asking questions, he's not asking question, these are statements, with "correct" added. No search for information. Furthermore; he's constantly mixing expressions, to trip up witnesses ; he does it in other clips as well; "from any other witness than Ms Heard, have you any reason to believe..." - either you heard it from someone (hear-say) or you have reason to believe, not both. Crazy that it's allowed. Just hope the jury sees it for what it is...
@@brmbkl Exactly. It's honestly insane how he's just allowed to abuse hear-say with literally no consequence. They can't make any sort of progress in the case when the second Depp is recalling something from a third party, there's immediate objection.
It's on purpose. Just because a judge sustains an objection doesn't mean that the jury will ignore the question or the implication that they're trying to make against him, even though they're not supposed to give it any consideration.
@@shade9272 I realize that. But at what point should a judge become proactive and warn a lawyer against a certain pattern of inappropriate questions? After 10 sustained objections? 100? 1,000? One of the judge’s roles is to prevent irrelevant lines of questioning that prejudice a jury.
@@kenmaingot exactly, she could have shut down this guys inane time wasting poorly executed attempt at pulling a fast one on the jury at any point but chose not to.
Reading out terrible tabloid headlines out in court just showed how desperate they were & their whole defense was based on lies just like the lies in those awful rags & this lawyers demeanour is so abrasive. Did I read that right? Correct? Correct? Correct? Aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!!!
It's nice to see that literacy is a basic requirement for being a lawyer. He did a great job reading those headlines for 5 minutes straight. Gold star ⭐!
Her legal team is as arrogant and unintelligent as she is! It’s lovely watching an attorney dig his/her own hole over and over again. He objected to his own question! 🤣🤣🤣. That’s beyond phenomenal.
It's more that her legal team is so desperate to win or at least minimize the damage to her rep. Sometimes as a lawyer you have to go through such lengths.
Love how the lawyer said " In fact you waited until Amber wrote the OP-Ed before you went to clear your name?" Isnt this the OP-ED they keep saying that Amber didn't write. Good job on Ambers team!
If I were a juror in this case I’m be pissed at the idiot defense lawyer. He’s wasting everyone’s time and just making her look worse. It’s infuriating lol
The lawyer is making quite a fool of himself and so is his colligue. I hope the jury will recognize that and make their verdict accordingly. He probably doesn't know himself what he wants to prove with these newspaper articles. They have zero significance. But they obviously don't have anything better up their sleeve.
I love how I wrote this and then listened to the psychologist talk about her having borderline and histrionic PD. My years OS self study are really paying off
Reading tabloid headlines is part of their defence?!? WTF...he is an international celebrity, clearly smack has been written about him and his life since he became famous! Are Amber’s lawyers qualified and educated...that should be a headline itself!!!
Of course it's wrong. Some people study law to help truth be discovered. Other people, like this laughable lawyer, are simply egotistical, selfish, unethical mercenaries.
I didn’t think anyone could make Amber Heard look worse than she is, but HER lawyers are doing a spectacular job.
Welp, she gotta ask for that refund after the trial, gonna need that money 😆😅
Hahahahhaha amazing job
He’s doing his best , he is not a bad lawyer, she just doesn’t have anything on deep
They're doing it on purpose they hate her too.
I can’t blame the lawyer. He literally has nothing to work with. All this legal team is trying to do is collect a big check from Heard because they know they have no real convincing defense for her actions.
When an attorney enters TABLOID headlines into evidence, they're truly lacking any serious case at all.
Especially an attorney that cries 'hear say' after every 4 or 5 words that Depp says LOL. What a joke, dude
Eww Tracy republican I Love It! ❤️
Yes, embarrassingly desperate!
just 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yeah, the headlines remind me of 'I was raped by skinheads from Mars'. Since when are tabloid headlines based on proven facts instead of malicious gossip?
"This is hearsay is it not? Your favourite word?" CLASSIC. This lawyer is an embarrassment.
He sure is. He's a DICK. He's doing his best to rattle Depp. And he's not winning. 😉
None of those articles are proven facts.There hearsay and opinions of ppl only.Not sure the relevance to this case? Nonsense !
She has been entitled to abuse JD. Why not piss the court off as well.. as a Judge ,I’d double JD’s Asking fee for pissing me off.
@@johnnorris1983 ikiiiii
Sounds like speculation to me.
There’s people who crack under pressure. Then, there’s Johnny Depp.
the three things i get from this:
- the lawyer knows how to read
- johnny kept his composure
- johnny made everybody laugh
hahaha
Am I reading that right?
Lol
@@nabeelnitro6447 you continue to read that correctly 😂
@@nabeelnitro6447 CORRECT
"She had a choice, I didn't" strong words from a truthful man
What time stamp is this from?
@@tituslim3137 5:57
Agreed.
@@ImSanctor Thank you Josh👍
@@ImSanctor thank you
He has definitely restored his reputation no matter what the jury says. Everyone loves him.
yeah but since the much bigger corporate guys don't really know what we think so they most likely won't give him jobs anymore
@@TheCentre101 If he wins the accusations will fall
Fully. Sad to say that i lost my respect for him when she uploaded those fabricated videos.. but two years ago, as the audio tapes came to light, I realised that it was all lies.
If he lost this case, he’s still won his reputation back!
@@MSM.2597 you are the problem why honest people lose their jobs.
@Sandra Myers your opinion means nothing to the majority
Depp is soooo smart…. Not everyone will notice it but he takes his time answering questions giving his team time to jump in if they needed too. Johnny Depp and his team are GOATED!!!
Man i had zero observation regarding this. I thought he was just looking for answers with those long pauses . This was megagenius and I am an idiot.
-Makes sense why couldn't last a month in college-
"She had a choice, I didn't."
Damn, such a simple sentence but it hit me like a bus. Poor guy.
I as well. And u know everyone in that courtroom especially that jury did as well. At least half of em. I mean come on what a joke of a job her lawyers are doing.
Or when he stated “How did they know” about the tabloids.. Exactly!! Wonder if Amber sent the info in herself to get some $ on the side..
@@samyoungblood3740 I wondered the same thing. Not just for money. But to make Johnny look bad. Omg I'd love see someone come to the stand to say yes I published this tabloid because amber brought it to me ! God imagine if that happens
@@samyoungblood3740 that was absolutely brilliant!
highlighting that her PR campaign was beginning in advance once she knew he wasn't gonna OD and leave her everything in the will even if she denied him the detox meds - it was gonna take more to extract millions from him and she wouldn't have him putting the word in to get her extra film roles
Any person with anger issues would be irritated, but Johnny stays calm, also says a lot.
Right? I thought the same thing!!
This! 👆🏼
@@sagewillowLisa I really believe that this was the hope of the defense, drive him to anger to discredit his testimony, the moment the criminal charges were dropped the defamation case becomes open and shut unless you can sway the court's opinion somehow
Exactly, the whole reason they we doing this, because it would be rightly murdered on re-direct, would be to get him to explode so they could taint the jury.
Completely agree.
This defense team is truly embarassing. If Johnny Depp doesnt win this it would be indescribably disgraceful
@Keenan Molver Better than any Netflix comedy special I’ve ever seen lol.
It's frustrating for me because I know how much lawyers make and you think these people would have the best lawyers money can buy and yet I feel like I'm listening to 12-year-olds just being snotty
Objection. Objection. Objection. Objection. Objection.
I think he's trying to reiterate defaming inquiries just to desperately nail in the idea that Depp is nefarious to the jury. It honestly doesn't matter if it's stricken from record or objected, so long as they hear it. The problem is that it's so overt, even a child would see through the attempt at being manipulated, let alone a group of fully functioning adults.
Anyway, they're just throwing darts, trying to hit any mark they can. It's kind of embarrassing to watch.
@Keenan Molver Sorry, couldn't be more wrong re lawyer skills. Textbook with some flare on cross. Need to watch some trials. And I say that with respect. 40 years experience here.
And I'm in Johnny's camp.
Agree 100%
His legal team is solid af. It looks terrifying to be in there being scrutinized for every single word choice, where a simple "yes/no" can change the whole perspective on you. It must be comforting to have your lawyers fully assisting you in avoiding as many double-edged questions as possible and with that much confidence
His legal team are Heroes
I was just thinking that. These questions are all the same but with words twisted to try to trick him. Thank goodness for his legal team and for him being able to keep his composure and calmy tell the truth. Also.. funny that Camille was able to get AH to basically admit to everything successfully... because she's sharp as a tack.
you don't have to be a Johnny Depp fan to realize this is ridiculous. WE STAND BY JOHNNY.
She’s a 🤡🤡🤡
Being a victim of domestic abuse, its is cutting close to the bone, i feel for johnny
Exactly I haven't watched a single movie of him but here I am supporting him in my full attention. That lawyer is an idiot Pu***.
Why??? This narcissist blew more money on drugs and booze then most people will ever make! Now he has to sue others to try to support his drug and booze addictions.
@@victorvalentino5872 Does blowing money on drugs and booze make domestic abuse acceptable?
All I got out of this is that her lawyer knows how to read and Johnny Depp's humor is still intact.
Made me think his career is not all that gone
@@livinlikejonni6082 I'm starting to believe that after all these comedy short movies Johnny's career will just rise again
And the fact that the lawyer doesn’t know how to ask questions that get the point across. He only asked a few questions that didn’t get objected to
Those who experienced what Johnny has, rely on their humor to survive, it’s not that he’s making fun of anything, it’s that he’s trying to bring a little light into the darkness looming over
@@thedeependrap2135 : Some lawyers believe that they gain an overall advantage with the jury by firing many questions at the witness. Even if the majority of the questions get objected to and sustained, the jury will remember the barrage of questions more than they remember that they were sustained. And being forced to face a barrage of hostile questioning makes the witness defensive, and makes them look like they are in the wrong even if they aren’t.
It’s a cheap trick, but it often works, which is why the lawyers do it.
My blood boils whenever Johnny is not given the opportunity to finish his sentence. Like JUST LET THE MAN TALK
Ughh . That lawyer is Trash 🤣🤣
Very frustrating.
Don't let it bother you. He's already won, whatever the verdict it. Nobody believes Amber Heard - and everyone is laughing at her lawyer. Read the comments - all Team Johnny.
Actually it's a decent ploy by the lawyer to attempt to get a reaction out of johnny to show that he has anger/rage issue
In this situation him not answering those leading questions helps his case though…..
It's almost end of 2023 and yet I still come to back to watch this from time to time...
Uganda
Oh my...is this really true?! WOW am super excited to read from you.
@Johnnydepp26 'am a relative!' And relatives stick together no matter what...
This is so pathetic. These are opinion pieces and 100% hearsay. I'm so glad the people in court are laughing with him.
Where's the objections??! 🤣 if Johnny's team brought this up her lawyer would be objecting to it all!
The articles look like sensation and scandalous ones. Ms. Heard’s lawyer only found these articles?
They are laughing at him as Depp is such a degenerate!!!😂😂😂
Maybe she can wipe some Amica cream on her butt
I don't get why these articles weren't hearsay
It is nothing but comical that these lawyers would think bringing in TABLOID stories as part of their defense is anything but ridiculous. I honestly can't believe this is real.
These guys seem like ambulance chasers…
I don't understand why Tabloids/headlines aren't classed as Hear Say. As its wrote by someone that wasn't physically there to witness it nor did they hear it with their own ears!
News stories go by being told something through a second person ie gossip/Chinese whisper.
And we all know that alot of these head lines are just a load of crap some completely false bs just to get you to buy them.
Well, he tries to prove that it was not AH's article which destroyed JD's reputation, so it makes sense.
The lawyer is fishing.
All i know is this dude chose the wrong career. Shoulda been a professional reader. he was reading everything so damn correctly.
The lawyer should be a pooper scooper at career end....just like turd.
🤣🤣👍🏼
🤣🤣🤣
QUINSEY : Wish I could give You 100 👍’s for that one!!
😂really cracked me up
I’ve heard the phrase “did I read that right?” More times in this trial than I did during the entirety of teaching a child how to read
And also “What if any….blah blah blah”
And also "correct?" and "did he naaht?"
Also , objection blah blah blah
😂😂😂...
That is a good one
The amount of patience Johnny has with that lawyer is astounding.
I'd honestly lose my temper if I had to spend hours doing this
@@shawn_1120 Thats what the lawyers were banking on.
@@fuksmkoud6716 no surprise there. Good to know this is a strategy the legal system would bet on :/
I’d like to make fun of him all day long for saying objection to himself in another video lmao
No kidding! I think he’s amused with them and knows nobody is taking them seriously.
Remember, the lawyer is purposefully trying to bait an angry or aggressive response from Johnny. Johnny did an incredible job keeping his composure.
I think he’s more interested in trying to establish a motive that he had troubles before her article and her account confirms basically all the tabloid trash.
When probably in actuality he didn’t care about the tabloids because they aren’t factually based however her article was taken as a factual representation of their relationship.
Trying to get him rattled about crappy articles………the attorney is either to dumb or doesn’t know much about who he’s questioning.
Depp could care less about whatever gossip is buzzing around town but he does care about his side of the story getting out.
Yes
He’s kept his composure throughout this ordeal
That’s why I love this guy, she’s a pos. Her karma is coming. Did she not think she would come out as the bad guy, or was she just that delusional?
Hell yeah.
'' You did, you should read the aticle. It's wonderful."
That line is one of the best. Bless Johnny Depp.
4:20
then everyone laughed LMAO
I loved it Lol!
I laughed out loud when he said that 🤣🤣🤣
I literally laughed aloud. This man is so sharp and witty.. he speaks slowly and chooses his words carefully and when he does…. Maaan oh man. It’s fantastic. His humor is perfection.
“This is hearsay, is it not?”
“Your favourite word.”
Depp has great delivery
It is hearsay actually lol
@@anywaythewindblows8938 you’re not suppose to be here.
the man is an excellent actor after all
@@anywaythewindblows8938no its "This is HERESY" 😂
This is Hershey 🍫👅👅👅
Never seen a lawyer take such a big L before. That was literally terrible
“Was miss Heard associated to the claims the same day she made the claims?” Wtf was this lawyer on??
@Panda Banana hahaha good one😂
‘Hold my beer” -Marsha Clark
BIG FACTS
Trae, did you watch the Rittenhouse trial? It was worse than this.
This lawyer has amazing reading skills. I'm so glad he was able to show off his reading skills and have them confirmed with Johnny
🤣🤣🤣 right
period
Every lawyer has to do this
😂😂😂😂
😭😭
Heard’s lawyers are TERRIBLE, bringing tabloid news articles to a cross examination is completely asinine! Every question was a clear point of objection.
This was deliberate so the jury could hear negative newspaper's storys about Depp to put in their minds, that lawyer knew all of them would get objected and sustained. The news can publish "yellow journalism" if you will because they have little loops like "sources say" or freedom of speech etc
Cuz they literally have no evidence or have anything else on him, its their job but its just pathetic.
To be fair, he references the articles as a well you are suing this one not all of those
Still very stupid but I see his point
"news" is a strong word. These are opinions at best.
“I am doing things that are true to me. The only thing I have a problem with is being labeled.” ― Johnny Depp. Good to see a man staying true to his word.
Man, the fact that her lawyers "heresay"ed so much of what Johnny said and then have the nerve to bring up literal articles of hearsay and just read titles is absolutely embarassing
It's not about having nerve. It's about telling one side of a story from every angle. You don't have to like it.
@@lambdaman3228 It’s not about liking it it’s about legal procedure lmao. I mean, the amount of objections sustained in this clip alone speaks for itself. You Don’t consider every angle of perspective when making an objective conclusion. Angles lacking in validity are rightfully thrown away. Literal Tabloid articles have no place in court as evidence. It Is about nerve because the lawyer’s making a ridiculous move.
It’s a PATHETIC ATTEMPT OF HEARSAY! Lol
@@anomienormie8126 > I mean, the amount of objections sustained in this clip alone speaks for itself
Does it? The jury was present for all of those questions. Regardless of if JD answered the questions, the jury saw and heard each question, left unanswered, and all and the implication of it. You say it speaks for itself and I agree, but I think it's speaking different things to each of us. I see it as a brilliant legal strategy to plant thoughts into the jury's mind.
I don't think it will work, but I think they have a weak defense anyway so props to them for trying something.
> You Don’t consider every angle of perspective when making an objective conclusion.
Yes, you do.
> Angles lacking in validity are rightfully thrown away.
Yes, but you have to consider them to determine if they are valid or not, hence you consider the totality of angles.
> Literal Tabloid articles have no place in court as evidence.
In a defamation case they absolutely do have a place. Tabloids are where fame or "defamation" is propagated.
Its hearsay btw :)
The weirdest part about being a lawyer to me is how you have to give a pathetic monologue of nothingness as a last ditch to win while everyone including you know it’s absolutely insanity
Couldn't have said it better. Pure buffoonery
Is there any other way to have a fair trial? You have to let both parties defend themselves.
The lawyer get paid either way. He has to show he is working "to win" the case. He is really doing it for himself.
And then pressure the plaintiff about the cost of professionals in the court room 🙄
@@XEveryoneLovesEmilyX the question isnt if, but how you attempt to defend somebody is here what's interesting. I think he comes of veery dislikable with his lame attacks ad hominem throughout the case.
I never thought I'd see the day where tabloid articles are brought into legal court proceedings. What a world. They really putting lawyer's rep to risk
I cannot fathom how those rags are not treated as hearsay.
My thoughts all through this
I mean i dont think he was using that as evidence he was guilty of theese things, just that amber didnt have much of an influence on his downfall
Hence; *Tabloid*
And they stated it themselves. I don’t get how the Judge let them go through with it because they’re assumption articles, or in this case “hearsay”. It’s all hearsay and they’ve been going more than 6 weeks. Americas justice system is cheeks.
@@petrhamera9399 ohhh
Johnny's little quips in between reading each of the false publication headlines were strangely satisfying.
"You read that very, very well." WHAT A LEGEND.
Whist a "yes" could have implied admission of action, a "yes, you read that correctly" defines it as simply answering the question
So this lawyer can read...
He's on full Jack Sparrow mode here... You can't help but feel respect for that old crazy pirate.
legend isa nothoig riple ll rege boom d!e all do
My brain is melting at the fact that this lawyer very seriously thought it would be effective to use tabloid articles against Depp. I cannot believe what I just witnessed
whats more bothering is that the court allows the use of reading tabloid news as evidence or whatever, really newspapers in court from some punk ass journalist ?
I find it insulting toward the jurees to think them so dumb that they would believe blindly tabloids "tease tittles" and that wouls be enought to influence them in a serious court case. And for a lawyer to use tabloids to counter DEFFAMATION trial (guys seriously lol). Amber Heard at best have bi polar disorders or at worst is a narcissic pervert manipulator. Either need treatment and to be estrained from coming close EVER to Johnny Depp or any memeber of his relatives. Cause she clearly have an obsession against him. When money isn't your interest (wich is not her case obviously) you just brake up with the person and never want to have anything to do with it. You don't try to destroy his image or his reputation.
wheres the repiles? im curious
it is a SUPER common trick in courts to re-read yellow (also known as fictional or sci-fi) press tabloid titles to divert from the punchline that actually misleads the reason why case exists in the first place - in other words an 8-step routine and its old like a roman empire old:
1. read fictional titles -
2. belittle the true reason for a case -
3. switch to pointless reason on the fly -
4. demand to accept that is the only reason -
5. lock plaintiff in a loop by endless speculations -
6. enforce the pointless reason -
7. convince the jury that plaintiff made a mistake -
8. win the case -
rightttt its bazaar
Johnny's lawyer is fantastic for letting this guy make a fool of himself without objecting to the tabloids.....everyone knows they make stuff up! The objections are at the perfect moments! Good Job Johnny's attorney!
Its because there is nothing to object to.. The lawyer is asking “did i read that correctly”.. as he is reading an exhibit.. Regardless of how stupid it is.. there is no violation.
Using walamrt tabloid articles as evidence is a stellar move for a lawyer 😂😂😂
Exactly I agree. Any lawyer or judge would see how ridiculous it is to ask questions about tabloid headlines??!?!? Johnny has a great lawyer, kudos to him👊.
@@DiamondWhite91 relevance and hersay for most of the articles valid objections.
This stuff is akin to writing "Johnny Depp is Guilty" on a piece of paper, handing it to him and reading out what he wrote on the paper and asking "did I read that correctly"
The sad part is there's enough stupid people in the world that it might even work.
I just love hearing his lawyer say ‘objection’ and then the judge immediately agree with ‘sustained’. Never gets old
Amen lol.
@Josh Smith lol when does tgat happen?
@@CarlosBruguera he asked a question to Johnny’s butler, then when the butler began to answer, the lawyer said “objection hearsay” 🤡
@@emperor8716 lol but what second in the video does that happen at?
@@CarlosBruguera not in this video, i think
JD is so on point with everything that comes out of his mouth. Not once did he waver in the entire trial!!!
She's trying to intimidate him even right there in court. His calmness is driving her even madder. 🤣🤣🤣
Typical bully behavior
He’s just better actor XD
More mad!
That's how it's done, my friend. Nothing drives a crazy ex crazier than your happiness. It's like an arrow in the narcissistic heart.
Cluster B personality disorder
It's like her lawyer just learned how to read and is so proud to show it off.
When Johnny responded "You read that very well" he sounded like he was praising his child 😂
Reading doesn't mean comprehension let alone discernment of truth from tabloid gossip rags.
🤣😂🤣
The fact that the lawyer is trying to use tabloids is insane. Its pathetic. Johnny is an innocent man.
I think the preferred term is "not guilty"
@@brosef4154 yes he is.
@@brosef4154 it is not a criminal case lol. He ain’t the one on trial either lol. She is.
@@brosef4154 No one ever is
The line of questioning was not effective, but I think what the lawyer was trying to establish was that Depp had already done damage to his reputation before Heard's piece was ever published. That's why he kept pointing to articles that preceded hers.
One of my favorite actors of all times. And I like what he's doing in the music scene that's cool. He's such a kind man ❤
He said it perfectly “a pathetic attempt”. Everyone knows those tabloids are full of bs. The audacity and foolishness of this lawyer my gosh. 🤯
agreed
The purpose of putting the articles from 2016 into the record is not to say they were accurate, but to show that he was getting a lot of bad publicity that could have poisoned the possibility of future roles prior to the 2018 op-ed. The jury might decide his injuries were less than $50 million or possibly none at all. I don't have a dog in this fight - I'm simply sharing why the articles and questions regarding their existence were allowed.
@@kelleyeidem667 maybe but they didn't effect the role he already had in the harry potter spin off movies. Which he lost because of AH's oped. And that role alone lost him millions.
@Jane's the real question is how is this evidence not permissible and even allowed. The judge allows it, even though its all from Ambers publicist. She is crying now about Gavin a personality disorder after years of further abuse just to smear his name after ruining his career when all he did was protect her. No man even gets to be heard like this and it 100% shows how sick the system is.
it's the lawyer's job to defend their clients at all cost so i kinda understand
They keep trying to bring out his "uncontrollable monster-rage" side, but it keeps failing because it doesn't exist. He's just not violent towards other people. That is all that has been shown so far by this testimony and "evidence". Mr. Depp keeps meeting the disrespect and deliberate cruelty with humor, rational explanation, and calm; well done, good sir.
I would explode in rage if a clown like that crook lawyer would talk to me like that and im not even a superstar.
His reaction to the abuse has allowed the jury to witness his demeanor. Thanks AMBER HEARD. Truth prevails and when you display your shirt played out lies for the entire world to not even believe you I think you should be apologizing and thinking of a different strategy at this point. Your STUPID LADY!
@@liandre9035 I would be upset, but I will be mostly entertained, I mean just look at them 😂
He had very hard 6 years to be sober and ready for this trial. He is not that dumb.
@@Chad-bc9vi i wish i could think this way 😅
I’m reaching free Brittany levels. This is so unbelievably unfair to Johnny Depp. It’s infuriating. He better win.
That's the best line about this whole sitch rofl
Yes let’s free him.
Exactly my thoughts.
It's Britney dude.
He's definitely winning
How the judge and jury managed to keep a straight face during this is beyoned me it’s comedy gold 😂😂
I can't believe this is not a bad written movie. I hope it has the ending Johnny deserves. Stay strong
“Tommy Wasseau casts Johnny Depp in latest court room drama”
I’m starting to wonder if this is all smoke and mirrors 😂
@@fixairplane3624 That's all it is. The latest distraction.
Her lawyer deserves a wedgie and a noogie
Don't worry it will be a movie real soon lol.
This was embarrassing but so entertaining! You’re well supported Mr Depp! The world is on your side
@Ululu Kululu nice try Amber
@ SavSHINee…. I sooooo complete agree with u! Spot on and so very well said! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼❤️❤️
@Ululu Kululu well yeah no one else has ever claimed him abusive ,so with others saying she is mean or abusive, then clearly support her.Seems pretty logical.
@@janineparker3041 HAHAHAH
@Ululu Kululu you are about the only one, this woman is a abuser and did all the same drugs he did, so that point is moot she absolutely 100% has big time mental illness issues
Imagine using tabloid articles as evidence. lmfao
Exactly as Johnny said "This is hearsay, your favorite word."
🤣
To be fair, they can use those articles as proof because it's a civil and not a criminal court if I remember right
@@XXX3155 Proof of what? That a "paper" published what some "journalist" imagined and wrote down?`
Have you ever in your life seen a tabloid headline and then read the actual article and gone "that seems true"?
Hearsay Tabloids 😐
@@nobody4060 hearsay is pretty much the definition of tabloid...
Love the way he still smiles..Please give the guy a break , his trying to stay strong
The way the lawyer doesn’t let him speak is a great proof that he’s not easily irritated and aggressively responding 😌 I would be already mad if I was Johnny constantly interrupted hahahaha
That’s what they are trying to do - aggravating and being provocative is their only way to win, but Depp isn’t giving in so easily… or at all.
@@slavyori2140 agreed. they tried and tried to provoke him. if he is a violent, aggressive human being in nature, he would have retaliate. hey, even non violent people has limit, but here we can clearly see how calm and relax JD was... it's really against what AH and most media portrayed him. we can check on how JD in so many talked show... he is indeed gentle and a calm person; always in deep thought before responding to any questions and any act...
His tactic is try to get Johnny angry to demonstrate aggression unfortunately Johnny is a Class Act
@@adryaniha459 No, its just about how much youre willing to endure. Someone can be super violent and abusive when nobody is watching and then be a charismatic darling when they are.
Yes yes yes. I would’ve shoved the mic down his throat already. Very very stressing all these thrown accusations.
I’m embarrassed for the defense. Are they really using gossip and tabloid articles as a defense?
Edit: I understand why they did it. It’s just embarrassing to see them grasping at anything they can to paint Johnny into a bad light, no matter the “source.”
Cringe worthy isn't it 😂🙄
If they had factual evidence, they wouldn’t be.
Yes they are. I keep wondering when I'm going to find out this a badly done movie of the week. ( That shows my age huh ? )
Oh look at poor Amber. She looks like she's been beat down so many times.
Im surprised they didnt shout hearsay lol
I’m surprised Heard’s lawyers are referring tabloids to make his case. That’s real substance right there
I couldn't agree more.
Objection, hearsay!
Did they use the recording of her abusing him?
That's why they are called Tabloids. They are the reason for Princess Diana's accident and untimely death to many suicides. They don't have truth in them
Her lawyer has nothing else, he is desperate and it shows, he is trying to frustrate Johnny and make him show anger while he is on the stand so he can bring some form of doubt to the jury, in efforts to turn the case in favor of Amber... it's all her lawyer got, he know she is lying, but he is just as dead inside as she is and will not quit, he is just waiting and hoping for a slip up by Johnny or some other witness so the jury can have doubt and he can feed the doubt... I'm happy Johnny isn't allowing the lawyer rush him and keeps talking as he tries to talk over him(if he can get Johnny to just stick to the yes and no answering, with no extra comments, the chances are higher to turn the case the way her lawyer want it, if he cant keep Johnny from saying extra comments, he tries talk over in hope's the jury doesnt hear him). I'm happy that Johhny continues to respond the way he wants..
Every lawyer should watch this to learn what NOT to do in a court room.
“I believe that’s hearsay, your favorite word” Had me in fits
I heard that too 😅
timestamp please
@@lifewithoutborders1348 3:30
It’s not just hear say it’s speculation through and through
Every time Johnny cracks a joke, you can feel the jury trying to hold back a laugh
Who’s the jury and where are they? I’m unfamiliar with the seating arrangements
@@adamg7776 they are sitting in the chairs across from johnny
@@rollinOnCode I believe that's the gallery I don't think the jury was shown.
@@adamg7776 the jury is off camera. They don’t put the jury on camera.
And he should have been strongly advsed by the judge to stop it.
These lawyers can try to malign Johnny’s character but what they can’t do is to prove actual abuse!
*prove
Throughout this whole trial I haven't heard one iota of abuse on Mister Depp's part. All they have is a bunch of text which clearly a six-year-old can tell it's sarcasm. I wish him the best as well.
Well, unfortunately the burden of proof is on Depp's lawyers. It's a defamation case, and that's a bit more challenging to prove. That being said, even if Depp's team loses this case, it is VERY, VERY clear that the general public is overwhelmingly supportive and sympathetic to Johnny Depp. The public is clearly not buying Amber Heard's attempt in playing the victim. So, when this case is over, if she wins, people will boycott her movies and probably Disney as well, for what they did to Depp. You can't underestimate the power of the court of public opinion.
Respectively, they hey have proved perjury in spades
And I'm pro Johnny. The soundman obviously lied. The lawyers told him to say he didn't recall many times re Boston flight. The standard defense to perjury charges as every attorney knows.
Right... Except for the UK trial concluded that there was overwhelming evidence that Depp assaulted Heard. Change your news source
This part and the part when Camille objects in Amber's redirect is a masterclass in objections.
Link please 🙏🏾
So what her lawyer is trying to prove is that she didn't ruin his career in the 2018 article because she already ruined it starting 4 years earlier. Gotcha.
But that is all the lawyer needs to prove.
@@Guitar387 I dont think her lawyers are supposed to set her up as the villain this way. Just like them trying to say its okay that she beat him up because he was an addict. That's not a good defense. Them proving she ruined his career on a larger scale than the one article isn't a good defense.
When AH presents her case things are going to get rough. His salvation lies in a full consumption by the 11 jurors of the full, unredacted audio tapes of their fights particularly her visit to him on the so-called Uber recording where she repeatedly returns to taunt and degrade him. He's obviously under the influence but repeatedly ties to help her and shows genuine concern.
Civil trials in California do not require an unanimous verdict
@@douglasmoffat1538 im pretty sure this is in court in one of the Virginias
🎯
So the attorney obnoxiously screams “HERE-SAY” everytime Johnny speaks, but yet here’s the same attorney referring to tabloid and gossip magazines that are notoriously not credible- and this doesn’t qualify as here-say?
First of all it's spelled hearsay
💯
@@voidsabre_really.....
There's a special place in hell for people that wist language aka lawyers :)))
@@Akira-rm5sb pwnd
I hope the Jury can see how crazy this woman is and what Johnny has had to deal with. He deserves to be happy again and free from this woman and her drama.
Amen
Read somewhere that if she loses she will appeal
@ BOARD MEETINGS..👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼❤️. I second that!
Crazy. Is nothing. The manipulation and sheer narcissism is unbelievable. She's playing mind games for the world to see by dressing like him in court as well.
My ex was ) is exactly like that. They think they can actually become the person they're attempting to slander and will slip right into the person that they want to be and are attacking.
I admire Johnny's patience and self control. They had absolutely nothing on him, you can see how they tried desperately to twist the words and context with questioning him exactly those question which proves absolutely nothing. Johnny's face getting more and more p*ssed off but yet stays calm with all the crap.
"Did I read that right?"
"Did I read that correctly?"
This is hilarious, it's amusing to watch this lawyer make a fool of himself daily. 😅
Love this 'evidence' selection too. Tabloids are such a reliable source of factual information! 😂
Hilarious to see that's what her lawyer thinks is factual information! Craziness!
Supermarket tabloids have only one good use......privey paper (outhouse toilet paper)
"You read that very very well".
You don't understand the context lol
Is the lawyer from Florida? 🙃
Using tabloids as part of your evidence in court is laughable 😂
Pathetic right 🤣🤣🤣
I didn't get what he said when they laughed tbh
Definitely, it's scraping the bottom of the barrel!
At this point they're only trying to sway the jury and trying to indirectly virtue signal.
I was laughing at first, but realized this is a courtroom, not lunchtime in a high school cafeteria. NOW I’m pissed off! They’re setting a highly dangerous precedent here. Tabloids historically pay people for stories that may or may not be true and publish, completely omitting any fact check whatsoever. How could a judge allow those things anywhere NEAR a jury. I question the integrity of the JUDGE at this point.
This whole sequence of questions could have been summed up with “did people write defamatory things about you?”
“Yes, they did”
Exactly what I thought watching this nonsense. Never have I heard the word "sustained" used so much and it truly made me smile
Yep all this proves is that Amber's whole defense team have Nothing on Johnny. they are desperately trying to just make him look bad, but that chuckle from the audience in the court when Johnny threw facts back at the Lawyer shows how they all see that the media and defamatory stuff is BS. People today know what the media are all about, they will drag a celeb's name through the mud just for headlines.
Any logical person had only got to look at facts when it comes to Johnny Depp's career in Hollywood, sure he has substance abuse issues and drug addiction problems he is "human" afterall, but there has never been a single story even a rumor of anykind of abuse of women, by Johnny Depp. When a movie star is a A-hole you hear many stories of thier bad behaviour over years just like Weinstein.
the point is if Johnny was a abuser of women and real A-hole/SOB you would have heard things come out by now especially from his ex wives, Vanessa and Winona would be having a field day by now with the metoo movement. theres been nothing when it's come to Johnny Depp and his exes have been in full support of him that says alot.
@@SabrinaLWilliams “Crisis” , “Allegedly” , “Reportedly” … the lawyers brought this to court?! A male judge would have asked Counsel to approach. If I was presiding I would not have tolerated tabloid gossip in my courtroom. Her Honour is patient.
INdeed. It did not go anywhere.
-"Did I read this gossip article correctly?"
-"Yes, you did."
Apart from the the fact that this lawyer has good reading skills, we did not learn anything from it.
@@RaikenXion He's the one suing her for her alleged "defamatory" article that caused him his job. Her lawyer is showing the jury that he was bust before the article was published. He's pretty effective to be honest with you. I say this and I'm not a fan of Amber.
Johnny Depp, intelligent, patient and polite. Jesus if I ever go down I want Johnny as my lawyer he is a beast! Love this man!!!!
Why is this lawyer so unfriendly? Is this a strategy? I can't imagine this having any beneficial effect on Amber's side but maybe I don't understand courtroom strategies.
I don't think her lawyer understands courtroom strategies.
The opposition are always unfriendly to those they are against. At 15, I was ripped into by a grown mans defence. They didn't care. Repeating over, over and over again "you wanted to kiss him didn't you?", "you asked for him to kiss you, didn't you?". I was 14 (Christmas night, 1998) when the incident happened, forget the fact the man was older than my Dad. I was treated like a liar and a bit of a 'goer'. I lost faith in the system when he was found not guilty. I'm 37 and I still won't get into a black taxi by myself. When I get a private taxi, even though they are logged, I txt the ID number to my husband, or other family member.. just in case.
EDIT: Sorry.. 38, not long had my b/day.
@@teenybabs I'm so sorry this happened to you... Unfortunately in this world it's often the victims who are blamed for their aggression, and people like Amber Heard who will lie and try to make money out of false accusations, are making it even more difficult for the real victims to speak.
lawyers are often somewhat aggressive, often against the innocent party.
He want to make JD lose his temper, that way he may show he is indeed violent or short tempered even in courtroom. JD knowing this didn't let that happend and paciently answered all the "questions"
The fact that everyone can see her bullying tactics everywhere - even through her legal team, that being through attempted humiliation and berating to try and make Johnny break, is clearly lost on these people.
Top comment. That is all they have; more 'humiliation'.
They are trying to make Johnny snap during the trial so the whole world will see what monster AH turned him into. I feel bad for Mr.Depp
Tho if you want to disprove defamation its a good tactic. If they show that his reputation was already horrible then they effectively show she couldnt do any substantial damage to it. Its horrible but effective
@@TheRealGrubii The fact that we all look past what people have done in the past. This better obtain to Johnny too. He hurts himself from time to time with his addiction, but not others. There are so many people who publicly have said I used to have an addiction but I don't now. But what does his addiction have to do with not abusing that whatever she is?
I mean it's pretty hard for a lawyer to polish a turd
I was watching live and I absolutely could not believe what I was seeing. Imagine using headlines of click-bait tabloid / gossip mags written by people who don’t even know the defendant personally as “evidence” to a persons credibility. Meanwhile everyone in his life past and present are more than happy to testify his true character, THAT says more than any hit piece article could ever write about him. Also, notice how no one from Ambers camp past or present have come forward with anything supportive to say about her, it’s all been negative. Which I’m not surprised since she is the TRUE ABUSER.
Well said !!
Well said. Amber set Johnny up for these absurd non sense.
Justice for Johnny 🦅🇺🇸
Johnny's team should get the articles about her hiding being a coke addicted stripper before her failed attempt at modelling and that she actually quietly got Married to Tasya Van Ree who she was restrained, cuffed and arrested for publically beating in an airport in the year before she hooked up with Depp !
get her to read out the cops comments about why they pulled her off Tasya and how she called the arresting officer a homophobe when the woman cop is a long time married lesbian !
Unfair! Gaslighting...is all this narcissistic person did!
Hopefully the jury will see right though that….I love how Johnny brings up the defense’s favorite word, “heresay” 😂
Johnny is so composed and calm. I love this guy😅
Hats of to Depp's counsel for pouncing on those questions so quickly. They didn't let any of the defense's nonsense slither past them.
yes, it is a bit annoying how he kept asking the same question over and over worded slightly different.
Who are his lawyersthey are kick ass!
@@perry92964 I mean... I agree but isn’t that what most lawyers do lol
@@perry92964 that’s a tactic lawyers use to trip you up. investigators also do it. It’s a low-ball tactic, however and is generally frowned upon in high court settings like these ones. A lot of the times though, they would be let go. Mainly for the sake of a quick proceeding.
@@PixieLove5 damn law is scary
“I believe that’s hearsay-your favorite word” Awesome. I will always support JD. He got himself entangled with a terrible woman.
Laughed so hard
Entangled just like will smith’s wife , she love to call affairs entanglement.
Thanks for your utmost love and support has brought me this far, it has been a hard time for me going through this, but your love and support keeps me going and standing strong in this difficult times.
This attorney doesn’t even let him reply in his defense, so unfair to him
He’s trying so hard to drag Johnny down so he feels like a big man! He’s pathetic! GO JOHNNY!
thats because he know better ✋🤣
I said the same thing on here on another clip, and there was people saying he doesn't have to as he's a lawyer. 🙄🙄🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
I think someone needs to nail that AH lawyer to his chair. He's ridiculous
Yes he is, his question is “did I read this correctly?” It’s a yes or a no
Anyone else notice when Rottenborn objected to his own question, we never heard another word out of him?? 😂
This was a disgusting attempt to make JD react to these rumours. Look how patient this man is.
I was thinking the same thing. I would have snapped at this lawyer a long time ago. He is so demeaning to Johnny constantly talking over him.
Haha his crisis management team is shelling out $$ for you trolls I guess lol. He acts like a narcissist, you’re either blind or paid
If we listen to the recordings. he's really use to it. Cause this is EXACTLY how AH talks to him.
"The only time I was able to use my own voice" That was the smartest answer possible. Keep being you, Mr. Depp.
"She had a choice, I didn't."
And then he was IMMEDIATELY cut off by the lawyer ffs
@@amandab3946 The lawyer can say whatever he wants tbh. Doesn't necessarily matter in this case. Johnny's won the people, and we all hear him. The lawyer's won nothing but mockery.
I get it though to some extent. Everyone in this country has the right to defense, which Amber is in this case. If you had a defense that intentionally or even accidentally acted against you in any way, well then you've got one hell of an awful lawyer.
This guy managed to ask questions for 12 minutes and not get a single relevant answer o.o That's actually kind of impressive. I'm pretty sure most people would ask a good question even by accident
It really was just the same question but asked in a dozen slightly different ways. All in ways to spin him into whatever warped story they need it to be..
That's a point...lol... He's a bumbling fool, that's for sure. He's like the Mr. Bean of lawyering !
His only tactic as this point is "he was drunk sometimes and did drugs sometimes so therefore Heard is credible". He should not have been allowed to bring up so many irrelevant tabloid articles in this session.
@@jesteredGesture when I was trying for army, they did the same. In that test were 30 questions, but when I got them, i understood, that there are actualy 10 questions.. Fortunately, i got through. But I dont think that, ms Heards lawyer did know what he is doing. Acusations based on gossips. WTF?
He was hoping to use the questions to call for a legal conclusion, probably figured that if he asks enough Johnny and his team would get tired and make a misstep. If I was judge on this case I would tell him that if his next question was irrelevant or objectionable in any way he would be done.
Her attorneys are doing a fantastic job of tanking her case against Johnny.
Absolutely love how patronising Johnny is being. "Yes, you certainly did. You read that very well." Heard's lawyers are the worst. I love it.
I laughed really hard at that line. It was just so very well placed and passive aggressive but still humorous and in a kinda respectful tone at the same time that it's really hard to be condemned
No, sadly they're all very good lawyers, specifically Rottenborn. What we're seeing here is a guy who has so little to work with that low brow hit pieces are all he has.
Agree 😅😅😅
@@vsGoliath96 I would strongly disagree that her lawyers are "good". Amber Turd's lawyers seem to be highly incompetent, I would go as far as to say that they should be disbarred from practicing law, because they regularly make rookie mistakes and try to distort the facts.
@@averagegeek3957 Successful lawyers in the USA are "bad" in those exact ways. This is, unfortunately, how cases are won. The "anglo common law" court system is very much based on misleading and confusing the jury. The end result of a trial like this is not finding truth, it is finding which side wins the case.
"Yes, how did they know?" And the audience lost it 😂😂😂😂
The fact that 95% of the questions her lawyer asks johnny are objected AND sustained by the judge says a lot about how Amber's legal team does not have much against Johnny.
I believe Mr. RottenBorn is pushing their luck and trying to sway the jury's opinion on to their side by pushing the narrative with all these asked and answered questions despite the objections. their only strategy
It depends, there's also a video on youtube about the Heresay bits.
@@dante93nero That's a big difference though. Those happenend against Depp himself in the cross examination. He isn't a lawyer and doesn't know the rules, so that's hardly surprising. Having that many questions sustained as a lawyer in a row while asking the questions is not a good look.
my question is, "why did the Judge not say to him in exasperation, "move on, Counsel..."...
I love how everyone in the 'audience' laughs when dep say "you read that very well"
This lawer is just wasting time it seems
This attorney is a joke! I can’t believe this is being allowed in a court! WE STAND BY YOU JOHNNY!!
This is the worst one
Absolutely ridiculous 🙄 lawyer grasping at anything they can to pull Johnny down , they are a joke 🤔
Yes. She’s so mean that poor baby she has
Well said.
Glad this case is televised. People can tell for themselves
I'm starting to believe that after all these comedy short movies Johnny's career will just rise again. He is the protagonist here, carrying the fun and humbly making us see how good and worth respect he is
He'll be cast as himself in the movie 'based on real life events' about this court case.
Probably his best movie right now!
And I'd support tf out of that movie
I didn't realise it died.
Though i also never knew about these accusations... Actually I've never heard of this woman.
🤔 I think I'm out of touch
I hope soo🤗🤗🤗🤗
Johnny literally made her entire legal team look like a joke, all by himself.
Hey, give Amber’s lawyers some credit. They did a great job coming up with the worst strategy ever.
@@houdiniweenie69 Reading headlines of clickbait articles as evidence hahaha best tactic ever
@@apun9307 not quite on par with the Call of Duty thing that was pulled during Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial. Idc what anyone thinks about him, that was a WEAK strategy lol
Johnny's lawyer is pretty amazing to be honest. Like him, she NEVER loses composure or plays the game Mr. Rotten Born wants to play. In fact I would go as far as saying that both Johnny and the wonderfully capable lady that defends him were Born quite Fresh
Oh, they did that all by themselves.
Rotten is that guy who thinks everyone is laughing with him and doesn't realize everyone is laughing at him! 😂
"You can't name a single woman who's advanced her career by making an assault accusation."
-2.5 minutes later
"It is true then that Amber became a public figure representing domestic abuse"
I had no idea who Amber even was before all of this. Wouldn't even be able to recognize her.
I seen her in never back down but of course she looked different then so yeah i agree if i wouldn't of looked her up i wouldn't know her by name
Honestly I had no clue who she was. Had never seen anything with her in, now I just despise her
This is so true.. almost everyone knows the name johnny depp, but until this scenario and trials and all the bs going on, nearly nobody knew the name amber heard, until now, where almost everyone that knows JD, now knows AH
@@iplayzthegames6968 agree i hope she loses this she is just trashing his name
I didn't even know he was married to a younger woman until this nonsense.
The fact that the Jury keeps laughing with him is truly already the answer to this whole debate.
When even the jury can only sit back and laugh at this ridiculous circus show, you know it’s over for these clowns.
you can t see the jury, they are to the right of him out of sight. It's the gallery behind the lawyers that are laughing....... comon johhny boy you got this❤
The gallery (the spectators) are laughing. We can’t really hear if the jury is laughing.
@@paulaclayton309 I just said this - I guess I didn’t have to bc u beat me to it! Lol
Oh for sure the jury is laughing. Johnny Depp is charming
When objections to your lawyer’s questions are 100% sustained by the judge…you’re obviously not seeking justice in the legal sense. You’re putting on a show for the jury.
it should be sanctioned as well. if you rack em up like he does, he's just putting opinions out there.
Even when he's asking questions, he's not asking question, these are statements, with "correct" added. No search for information.
Furthermore; he's constantly mixing expressions, to trip up witnesses ; he does it in other clips as well; "from any other witness than Ms Heard, have you any reason to believe..." - either you heard it from someone (hear-say) or you have reason to believe, not both. Crazy that it's allowed.
Just hope the jury sees it for what it is...
@@brmbkl Exactly. It's honestly insane how he's just allowed to abuse hear-say with literally no consequence. They can't make any sort of progress in the case when the second Depp is recalling something from a third party, there's immediate objection.
It's on purpose. Just because a judge sustains an objection doesn't mean that the jury will ignore the question or the implication that they're trying to make against him, even though they're not supposed to give it any consideration.
@@shade9272 I realize that. But at what point should a judge become proactive and warn a lawyer against a certain pattern of inappropriate questions? After 10 sustained objections? 100? 1,000? One of the judge’s roles is to prevent irrelevant lines of questioning that prejudice a jury.
@@kenmaingot exactly, she could have shut down this guys inane time wasting poorly executed attempt at pulling a fast one on the jury at any point but chose not to.
Reading out terrible tabloid headlines out in court just showed how desperate they were & their whole defense was based on lies just like the lies in those awful rags & this lawyers demeanour is so abrasive. Did I read that right? Correct? Correct? Correct? Aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!!!
The amount of objections in this and the lawyer tripping over himself is so... SO bad. So humiliating for the lawyer 😂
Her counsel are very aggressive, even for cross. Hence his lawyers can repeatedly accuse them of harassment, which they did here.
He was tripping like Jack Sparrow with a jar of dirt.
Bro don't even know what he reading
Isn't all this hearsay?
@@marksdathorne Sustained
It's nice to see that literacy is a basic requirement for being a lawyer. He did a great job reading those headlines for 5 minutes straight. Gold star ⭐!
🙈
Laughing!
Disparate attempt to show that JDs career is falling because of his behavior not the defamation
He is a gold star reader. 😂
Those should be inadmissible because the headlines are littered with conjecture and editorial word choices that don't reflect objective fact.
Her legal team is as arrogant and unintelligent as she is! It’s lovely watching an attorney dig his/her own hole over and over again. He objected to his own question! 🤣🤣🤣. That’s beyond phenomenal.
It's more that her legal team is so desperate to win or at least minimize the damage to her rep. Sometimes as a lawyer you have to go through such lengths.
😂😂😂😂😂
maybe her team is just tired of Amber too
What do you expect them to do when they know she is digging her own grave. They are doing their best LMAO
Amber stink rubs of on them 💩
Love how the lawyer said " In fact you waited until Amber wrote the OP-Ed before you went to clear your name?" Isnt this the OP-ED they keep saying that Amber didn't write. Good job on Ambers team!
This lawyer is a COMPLETE TOOL.. isn’t this all “Hear Say?!”
That's what a civil trial is about basically but he's trying to twist words that's all. Mainstream media type of attack.
You might say it was HEARD-say... 😏
They are letting the lawyer destroy himself. The more he bullies JD the more hopefully the jury will hate the lawyer.
Reading tabloids wtf!? How is this proof!?
Yes 🙌
If I were a juror in this case I’m be pissed at the idiot defense lawyer. He’s wasting everyone’s time and just making her look worse. It’s infuriating lol
The lawyer is making quite a fool of himself and so is his colligue. I hope the jury will recognize that and make their verdict accordingly. He probably doesn't know himself what he wants to prove with these newspaper articles. They have zero significance. But they obviously don't have anything better up their sleeve.
Shows the defense attorney has NOTHING.
I find it hilarious.
this trial is ridiculous
@Lisa - Also, it's his pathetic attempt to steal the attention from his incompetence and JD with getting his cheap 15 minutes of fame. 🤡
The way she tries so hard to look sad and innocent all the time in court, cracks me up every time 😂
And how when you actually pay attention to her microexpressions you can see compounding levels of pissedness and disdain
@@Daffodillon and she breaks character 100 times infront of camera
I love how I wrote this and then listened to the psychologist talk about her having borderline and histrionic PD. My years OS self study are really paying off
She is just imitating humans with her expressions , she doesnt have any emotions…. Except crazy!!👍
You're not that good an actress, love.
Reading tabloid headlines is part of their defence?!? WTF...he is an international celebrity, clearly smack has been written about him and his life since he became famous! Are Amber’s lawyers qualified and educated...that should be a headline itself!!!
Amber turd’s legal team are embarrassing
She's pathetic
Yeah, they are just as embarrassing as Amber 💩
1000 percent NOT ready for prime time.
so is her fake ass attempt of appearing like a proper lady
I’m waiting for that name to catch on
What a joke on how the Heard attorneys are trying to simply embarrass JD. So pathetic. He handled it beautifully.
Of course it's wrong. Some people study law to help truth be discovered. Other people, like this laughable lawyer, are simply egotistical, selfish, unethical mercenaries.
“This is hearsay, your favorite word” 😂😂 Johnny Depp is so calm during this, I may start yelling. Wow. Good job Depp
I love that part lol
@Leslie A rumors
@Leslie A BS
@Leslie A rumours basically
@Leslie A quite literally: you heard someone say it and are using that as fact. That's not an admissable source
“You read that very well”
Bro this guy is a crack up