Court crack-up: Johnny Depp amused over tabloid stories, makes gallery laugh | LiveNOW from FOX
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- Johnny Depp became both amused and frustrated as Amber Heard's attorney went through a number of tabloid stories written about the actor before Heard's op-ed in the Washington Post, which is the basis for the lawsuit. At one point while reading the story headlines, Depp sarcastically complemented the attorney for reading the headline very well.
Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! www.youtube.co...
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox...
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.
I didn’t think anyone could make Amber Heard look worse than she is, but HER lawyers are doing a spectacular job.
Welp, she gotta ask for that refund after the trial, gonna need that money 😆😅
Hahahahhaha amazing job
He’s doing his best , he is not a bad lawyer, she just doesn’t have anything on deep
They're doing it on purpose they hate her too.
I can’t blame the lawyer. He literally has nothing to work with. All this legal team is trying to do is collect a big check from Heard because they know they have no real convincing defense for her actions.
"She had a choice, I didn't."
Damn, such a simple sentence but it hit me like a bus. Poor guy.
I as well. And u know everyone in that courtroom especially that jury did as well. At least half of em. I mean come on what a joke of a job her lawyers are doing.
Or when he stated “How did they know” about the tabloids.. Exactly!! Wonder if Amber sent the info in herself to get some $ on the side..
@@samyoungblood3740 I wondered the same thing. Not just for money. But to make Johnny look bad. Omg I'd love see someone come to the stand to say yes I published this tabloid because amber brought it to me ! God imagine if that happens
@@samyoungblood3740 that was absolutely brilliant!
highlighting that her PR campaign was beginning in advance once she knew he wasn't gonna OD and leave her everything in the will even if she denied him the detox meds - it was gonna take more to extract millions from him and she wouldn't have him putting the word in to get her extra film roles
"This is hearsay is it not? Your favourite word?" CLASSIC. This lawyer is an embarrassment.
He sure is. He's a DICK. He's doing his best to rattle Depp. And he's not winning. 😉
None of those articles are proven facts.There hearsay and opinions of ppl only.Not sure the relevance to this case? Nonsense !
She has been entitled to abuse JD. Why not piss the court off as well.. as a Judge ,I’d double JD’s Asking fee for pissing me off.
@@johnnorris1983 ikiiiii
Sounds like speculation to me.
His legal team is solid af. It looks terrifying to be in there being scrutinized for every single word choice, where a simple "yes/no" can change the whole perspective on you. It must be comforting to have your lawyers fully assisting you in avoiding as many double-edged questions as possible and with that much confidence
His legal team are Heroes
I was just thinking that. These questions are all the same but with words twisted to try to trick him. Thank goodness for his legal team and for him being able to keep his composure and calmy tell the truth. Also.. funny that Camille was able to get AH to basically admit to everything successfully... because she's sharp as a tack.
He said it perfectly “a pathetic attempt”. Everyone knows those tabloids are full of bs. The audacity and foolishness of this lawyer my gosh. 🤯
agreed
The purpose of putting the articles from 2016 into the record is not to say they were accurate, but to show that he was getting a lot of bad publicity that could have poisoned the possibility of future roles prior to the 2018 op-ed. The jury might decide his injuries were less than $50 million or possibly none at all. I don't have a dog in this fight - I'm simply sharing why the articles and questions regarding their existence were allowed.
@@kelleyeidem667 maybe but they didn't effect the role he already had in the harry potter spin off movies. Which he lost because of AH's oped. And that role alone lost him millions.
@Jane's the real question is how is this evidence not permissible and even allowed. The judge allows it, even though its all from Ambers publicist. She is crying now about Gavin a personality disorder after years of further abuse just to smear his name after ruining his career when all he did was protect her. No man even gets to be heard like this and it 100% shows how sick the system is.
it's the lawyer's job to defend their clients at all cost so i kinda understand
When an attorney enters TABLOID headlines into evidence, they're truly lacking any serious case at all.
Especially an attorney that cries 'hear say' after every 4 or 5 words that Depp says LOL. What a joke, dude
Eww Tracy republican I Love It! ❤️
Yes, embarrassingly desperate!
just 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yeah, the headlines remind me of 'I was raped by skinheads from Mars'. Since when are tabloid headlines based on proven facts instead of malicious gossip?
the three things i get from this:
- the lawyer knows how to read
- johnny kept his composure
- johnny made everybody laugh
hahaha
Am I reading that right?
Lol
@@nabeelnitro6447 you continue to read that correctly 😂
@@nabeelnitro6447 CORRECT
I’ve heard the phrase “did I read that right?” More times in this trial than I did during the entirety of teaching a child how to read
And also “What if any….blah blah blah”
And also "correct?" and "did he naaht?"
Also , objection blah blah blah
😂😂😂...
That is a good one
My blood boils whenever Johnny is not given the opportunity to finish his sentence. Like JUST LET THE MAN TALK
Ughh . That lawyer is Trash 🤣🤣
Very frustrating.
Don't let it bother you. He's already won, whatever the verdict it. Nobody believes Amber Heard - and everyone is laughing at her lawyer. Read the comments - all Team Johnny.
Actually it's a decent ploy by the lawyer to attempt to get a reaction out of johnny to show that he has anger/rage issue
In this situation him not answering those leading questions helps his case though…..
Remember, the lawyer is purposefully trying to bait an angry or aggressive response from Johnny. Johnny did an incredible job keeping his composure.
I think he’s more interested in trying to establish a motive that he had troubles before her article and her account confirms basically all the tabloid trash.
When probably in actuality he didn’t care about the tabloids because they aren’t factually based however her article was taken as a factual representation of their relationship.
Trying to get him rattled about crappy articles………the attorney is either to dumb or doesn’t know much about who he’s questioning.
Depp could care less about whatever gossip is buzzing around town but he does care about his side of the story getting out.
Yes
He’s kept his composure throughout this ordeal
That’s why I love this guy, she’s a pos. Her karma is coming. Did she not think she would come out as the bad guy, or was she just that delusional?
Hell yeah.
"She had a choice, I didn't" strong words from a truthful man
What time stamp is this from?
@@tituslim3137 5:57
Agreed.
@@ImSanctor Thank you Josh👍
@@ImSanctor thank you
There’s people who crack under pressure. Then, there’s Johnny Depp.
This defense team is truly embarassing. If Johnny Depp doesnt win this it would be indescribably disgraceful
Lol that defense lawyer is getting schooled and humiliated, its so funny.
@@keenanmolver9689 Better than any Netflix comedy special I’ve ever seen lol.
It's frustrating for me because I know how much lawyers make and you think these people would have the best lawyers money can buy and yet I feel like I'm listening to 12-year-olds just being snotty
Objection. Objection. Objection. Objection. Objection.
I think he's trying to reiterate defaming inquiries just to desperately nail in the idea that Depp is nefarious to the jury. It honestly doesn't matter if it's stricken from record or objected, so long as they hear it. The problem is that it's so overt, even a child would see through the attempt at being manipulated, let alone a group of fully functioning adults.
Anyway, they're just throwing darts, trying to hit any mark they can. It's kind of embarrassing to watch.
@@keenanmolver9689 Sorry, couldn't be more wrong re lawyer skills. Textbook with some flare on cross. Need to watch some trials. And I say that with respect. 40 years experience here.
And I'm in Johnny's camp.
All i know is this dude chose the wrong career. Shoulda been a professional reader. he was reading everything so damn correctly.
The lawyer should be a pooper scooper at career end....just like turd.
🤣🤣👍🏼
🤣🤣🤣
QUINSEY : Wish I could give You 100 👍’s for that one!!
😂really cracked me up
He has definitely restored his reputation no matter what the jury says. Everyone loves him.
yeah but since the much bigger corporate guys don't really know what we think so they most likely won't give him jobs anymore
@@TheCentre101 If he wins the accusations will fall
Fully. Sad to say that i lost my respect for him when she uploaded those fabricated videos.. but two years ago, as the audio tapes came to light, I realised that it was all lies.
If he lost this case, he’s still won his reputation back!
@@MSM.2597 you are the problem why honest people lose their jobs.
@Sandra Myers your opinion means nothing to the majority
It's almost end of 2023 and yet I still come to back to watch this from time to time...
Uganda
Oh my...is this really true?! WOW am super excited to read from you.
@Johnnydepp26 'am a relative!' And relatives stick together no matter what...
Any person with anger issues would be irritated, but Johnny stays calm, also says a lot.
Right? I thought the same thing!!
This! 👆🏼
@@sagewillowLisa I really believe that this was the hope of the defense, drive him to anger to discredit his testimony, the moment the criminal charges were dropped the defamation case becomes open and shut unless you can sway the court's opinion somehow
Exactly, the whole reason they we doing this, because it would be rightly murdered on re-direct, would be to get him to explode so they could taint the jury.
Completely agree.
Johnny's lawyer is fantastic for letting this guy make a fool of himself without objecting to the tabloids.....everyone knows they make stuff up! The objections are at the perfect moments! Good Job Johnny's attorney!
Its because there is nothing to object to.. The lawyer is asking “did i read that correctly”.. as he is reading an exhibit.. Regardless of how stupid it is.. there is no violation.
Using walamrt tabloid articles as evidence is a stellar move for a lawyer 😂😂😂
Exactly I agree. Any lawyer or judge would see how ridiculous it is to ask questions about tabloid headlines??!?!? Johnny has a great lawyer, kudos to him👊.
@@DiamondWhite91 relevance and hersay for most of the articles valid objections.
This stuff is akin to writing "Johnny Depp is Guilty" on a piece of paper, handing it to him and reading out what he wrote on the paper and asking "did I read that correctly"
The sad part is there's enough stupid people in the world that it might even work.
All I got out of this is that her lawyer knows how to read and Johnny Depp's humor is still intact.
Made me think his career is not all that gone
@@livinlikejonni6082 I'm starting to believe that after all these comedy short movies Johnny's career will just rise again
And the fact that the lawyer doesn’t know how to ask questions that get the point across. He only asked a few questions that didn’t get objected to
Those who experienced what Johnny has, rely on their humor to survive, it’s not that he’s making fun of anything, it’s that he’s trying to bring a little light into the darkness looming over
@@thedeependrap2135 : Some lawyers believe that they gain an overall advantage with the jury by firing many questions at the witness. Even if the majority of the questions get objected to and sustained, the jury will remember the barrage of questions more than they remember that they were sustained. And being forced to face a barrage of hostile questioning makes the witness defensive, and makes them look like they are in the wrong even if they aren’t.
It’s a cheap trick, but it often works, which is why the lawyers do it.
Depp is soooo smart…. Not everyone will notice it but he takes his time answering questions giving his team time to jump in if they needed too. Johnny Depp and his team are GOATED!!!
Man i had zero observation regarding this. I thought he was just looking for answers with those long pauses . This was megagenius and I am an idiot.
-Makes sense why couldn't last a month in college-
The weirdest part about being a lawyer to me is how you have to give a pathetic monologue of nothingness as a last ditch to win while everyone including you know it’s absolutely insanity
Couldn't have said it better. Pure buffoonery
Is there any other way to have a fair trial? You have to let both parties defend themselves.
The lawyer get paid either way. He has to show he is working "to win" the case. He is really doing it for himself.
And then pressure the plaintiff about the cost of professionals in the court room 🙄
@@XEveryoneLovesEmilyX the question isnt if, but how you attempt to defend somebody is here what's interesting. I think he comes of veery dislikable with his lame attacks ad hominem throughout the case.
This is so pathetic. These are opinion pieces and 100% hearsay. I'm so glad the people in court are laughing with him.
Where's the objections??! 🤣 if Johnny's team brought this up her lawyer would be objecting to it all!
The articles look like sensation and scandalous ones. Ms. Heard’s lawyer only found these articles?
They are laughing at him as Depp is such a degenerate!!!😂😂😂
Maybe she can wipe some Amica cream on her butt
I don't get why these articles weren't hearsay
you don't have to be a Johnny Depp fan to realize this is ridiculous. WE STAND BY JOHNNY.
She’s a 🤡🤡🤡
Being a victim of domestic abuse, its is cutting close to the bone, i feel for johnny
Exactly I haven't watched a single movie of him but here I am supporting him in my full attention. That lawyer is an idiot Pu***.
Why??? This narcissist blew more money on drugs and booze then most people will ever make! Now he has to sue others to try to support his drug and booze addictions.
@@victorvalentino5872 Does blowing money on drugs and booze make domestic abuse acceptable?
How the judge and jury managed to keep a straight face during this is beyoned me it’s comedy gold 😂😂
This lawyer is a COMPLETE TOOL.. isn’t this all “Hear Say?!”
That's what a civil trial is about basically but he's trying to twist words that's all. Mainstream media type of attack.
You might say it was HEARD-say... 😏
They are letting the lawyer destroy himself. The more he bullies JD the more hopefully the jury will hate the lawyer.
Reading tabloids wtf!? How is this proof!?
Yes 🙌
It is nothing but comical that these lawyers would think bringing in TABLOID stories as part of their defense is anything but ridiculous. I honestly can't believe this is real.
These guys seem like ambulance chasers…
I don't understand why Tabloids/headlines aren't classed as Hear Say. As its wrote by someone that wasn't physically there to witness it nor did they hear it with their own ears!
News stories go by being told something through a second person ie gossip/Chinese whisper.
And we all know that alot of these head lines are just a load of crap some completely false bs just to get you to buy them.
Well, he tries to prove that it was not AH's article which destroyed JD's reputation, so it makes sense.
The lawyer is fishing.
She's trying to intimidate him even right there in court. His calmness is driving her even madder. 🤣🤣🤣
Typical bully behavior
He’s just better actor XD
More mad!
That's how it's done, my friend. Nothing drives a crazy ex crazier than your happiness. It's like an arrow in the narcissistic heart.
Cluster B personality disorder
“I am doing things that are true to me. The only thing I have a problem with is being labeled.” ― Johnny Depp. Good to see a man staying true to his word.
Heard’s lawyers are TERRIBLE, bringing tabloid news articles to a cross examination is completely asinine! Every question was a clear point of objection.
This was deliberate so the jury could hear negative newspaper's storys about Depp to put in their minds, that lawyer knew all of them would get objected and sustained. The news can publish "yellow journalism" if you will because they have little loops like "sources say" or freedom of speech etc
Cuz they literally have no evidence or have anything else on him, its their job but its just pathetic.
To be fair, he references the articles as a well you are suing this one not all of those
Still very stupid but I see his point
"news" is a strong word. These are opinions at best.
The amount of patience Johnny has with that lawyer is astounding.
I'd honestly lose my temper if I had to spend hours doing this
@@shawn_1120 Thats what the lawyers were banking on.
@@fuksmkoud6716 no surprise there. Good to know this is a strategy the legal system would bet on :/
I’d like to make fun of him all day long for saying objection to himself in another video lmao
No kidding! I think he’s amused with them and knows nobody is taking them seriously.
“This is hearsay, is it not?”
“Your favourite word.”
Depp has great delivery
It is hearsay actually lol
@@anywaythewindblows8938 you’re not suppose to be here.
the man is an excellent actor after all
@@anywaythewindblows8938no its "This is HERESY" 😂
This is Hershey 🍫👅👅👅
'' You did, you should read the aticle. It's wonderful."
That line is one of the best. Bless Johnny Depp.
4:20
then everyone laughed LMAO
I loved it Lol!
I laughed out loud when he said that 🤣🤣🤣
I literally laughed aloud. This man is so sharp and witty.. he speaks slowly and chooses his words carefully and when he does…. Maaan oh man. It’s fantastic. His humor is perfection.
I was watching live and I absolutely could not believe what I was seeing. Imagine using headlines of click-bait tabloid / gossip mags written by people who don’t even know the defendant personally as “evidence” to a persons credibility. Meanwhile everyone in his life past and present are more than happy to testify his true character, THAT says more than any hit piece article could ever write about him. Also, notice how no one from Ambers camp past or present have come forward with anything supportive to say about her, it’s all been negative. Which I’m not surprised since she is the TRUE ABUSER.
Well said !!
Well said. Amber set Johnny up for these absurd non sense.
Justice for Johnny 🦅🇺🇸
Johnny's team should get the articles about her hiding being a coke addicted stripper before her failed attempt at modelling and that she actually quietly got Married to Tasya Van Ree who she was restrained, cuffed and arrested for publically beating in an airport in the year before she hooked up with Depp !
get her to read out the cops comments about why they pulled her off Tasya and how she called the arresting officer a homophobe when the woman cop is a long time married lesbian !
Unfair! Gaslighting...is all this narcissistic person did!
Hopefully the jury will see right though that….I love how Johnny brings up the defense’s favorite word, “heresay” 😂
They keep trying to bring out his "uncontrollable monster-rage" side, but it keeps failing because it doesn't exist. He's just not violent towards other people. That is all that has been shown so far by this testimony and "evidence". Mr. Depp keeps meeting the disrespect and deliberate cruelty with humor, rational explanation, and calm; well done, good sir.
I would explode in rage if a clown like that crook lawyer would talk to me like that and im not even a superstar.
His reaction to the abuse has allowed the jury to witness his demeanor. Thanks AMBER HEARD. Truth prevails and when you display your shirt played out lies for the entire world to not even believe you I think you should be apologizing and thinking of a different strategy at this point. Your STUPID LADY!
@@liandre9035 I would be upset, but I will be mostly entertained, I mean just look at them 😂
He had very hard 6 years to be sober and ready for this trial. He is not that dumb.
@@Chad-bc9vi i wish i could think this way 😅
I admire Johnny's patience and self control. They had absolutely nothing on him, you can see how they tried desperately to twist the words and context with questioning him exactly those question which proves absolutely nothing. Johnny's face getting more and more p*ssed off but yet stays calm with all the crap.
I'm starting to believe that after all these comedy short movies Johnny's career will just rise again. He is the protagonist here, carrying the fun and humbly making us see how good and worth respect he is
He'll be cast as himself in the movie 'based on real life events' about this court case.
Probably his best movie right now!
And I'd support tf out of that movie
I didn't realise it died.
Though i also never knew about these accusations... Actually I've never heard of this woman.
🤔 I think I'm out of touch
I hope soo🤗🤗🤗🤗
“I believe that’s hearsay, your favorite word” Had me in fits
I heard that too 😅
timestamp please
@@lifewithoutborders1348 3:30
It’s not just hear say it’s speculation through and through
Imagine using tabloid articles as evidence. lmfao
Exactly as Johnny said "This is hearsay, your favorite word."
🤣
To be fair, they can use those articles as proof because it's a civil and not a criminal court if I remember right
@@XXX3155 Proof of what? That a "paper" published what some "journalist" imagined and wrote down?`
Have you ever in your life seen a tabloid headline and then read the actual article and gone "that seems true"?
Hearsay Tabloids 😐
@@nobody4060 hearsay is pretty much the definition of tabloid...
Johnny's little quips in between reading each of the false publication headlines were strangely satisfying.
"You read that very, very well." WHAT A LEGEND.
Whist a "yes" could have implied admission of action, a "yes, you read that correctly" defines it as simply answering the question
So this lawyer can read...
He's on full Jack Sparrow mode here... You can't help but feel respect for that old crazy pirate.
legend isa nothoig riple ll rege boom d!e all do
This was embarrassing but so entertaining! You’re well supported Mr Depp! The world is on your side
@Ululu Kululu nice try Amber
@ SavSHINee…. I sooooo complete agree with u! Spot on and so very well said! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼❤️❤️
@Ululu Kululu well yeah no one else has ever claimed him abusive ,so with others saying she is mean or abusive, then clearly support her.Seems pretty logical.
@@janineparker3041 HAHAHAH
@Ululu Kululu you are about the only one, this woman is a abuser and did all the same drugs he did, so that point is moot she absolutely 100% has big time mental illness issues
I never thought I'd see the day where tabloid articles are brought into legal court proceedings. What a world. They really putting lawyer's rep to risk
I cannot fathom how those rags are not treated as hearsay.
My thoughts all through this
I mean i dont think he was using that as evidence he was guilty of theese things, just that amber didnt have much of an influence on his downfall
Hence; *Tabloid*
And they stated it themselves. I don’t get how the Judge let them go through with it because they’re assumption articles, or in this case “hearsay”. It’s all hearsay and they’ve been going more than 6 weeks. Americas justice system is cheeks.
@@petrhamera9399 ohhh
These lawyers can try to malign Johnny’s character but what they can’t do is to prove actual abuse!
*prove
Throughout this whole trial I haven't heard one iota of abuse on Mister Depp's part. All they have is a bunch of text which clearly a six-year-old can tell it's sarcasm. I wish him the best as well.
Well, unfortunately the burden of proof is on Depp's lawyers. It's a defamation case, and that's a bit more challenging to prove. That being said, even if Depp's team loses this case, it is VERY, VERY clear that the general public is overwhelmingly supportive and sympathetic to Johnny Depp. The public is clearly not buying Amber Heard's attempt in playing the victim. So, when this case is over, if she wins, people will boycott her movies and probably Disney as well, for what they did to Depp. You can't underestimate the power of the court of public opinion.
Respectively, they hey have proved perjury in spades
And I'm pro Johnny. The soundman obviously lied. The lawyers told him to say he didn't recall many times re Boston flight. The standard defense to perjury charges as every attorney knows.
Right... Except for the UK trial concluded that there was overwhelming evidence that Depp assaulted Heard. Change your news source
This part and the part when Camille objects in Amber's redirect is a masterclass in objections.
Link please 🙏🏾
I can't believe this is not a bad written movie. I hope it has the ending Johnny deserves. Stay strong
“Tommy Wasseau casts Johnny Depp in latest court room drama”
I’m starting to wonder if this is all smoke and mirrors 😂
@@fixairplane3624 That's all it is. The latest distraction.
Her lawyer deserves a wedgie and a noogie
Don't worry it will be a movie real soon lol.
This lawyer has amazing reading skills. I'm so glad he was able to show off his reading skills and have them confirmed with Johnny
🤣🤣🤣 right
period
Every lawyer has to do this
😂😂😂😂
😭😭
This was a disgusting attempt to make JD react to these rumours. Look how patient this man is.
I was thinking the same thing. I would have snapped at this lawyer a long time ago. He is so demeaning to Johnny constantly talking over him.
Haha his crisis management team is shelling out $$ for you trolls I guess lol. He acts like a narcissist, you’re either blind or paid
If we listen to the recordings. he's really use to it. Cause this is EXACTLY how AH talks to him.
Every lawyer should watch this to learn what NOT to do in a court room.
I cannot believe THIS is her legal strategy!
Reading “headlines”??????
AH’s legal team is pathetic and, thankfully, blowing it!
All hearsay. Shitty defense and embarrassing.
Her lawyers aren't blowing it as it's all lies.
AH is clearly the type of person that if a bloke says morning to her she goes round telling everyone she is being hit on.
It's literally the same tactic they used in the 1st trial overseas and it worked(somehow).
reading article , nonstop objection hearsay and muffin detector are what they doing :))
So, while it is pretty pathetic, I can see the, rather poor, reason behind it. This is a defamation case. They're trying to prove that those headlines had ALREADY ruined Johnny's reputation, in effect trying to prove that Amber's article changed nothing. However, the hit pieces written about him attacked his financial status and his tendency to drink heavily and use drugs; Amber's article attacks his integrity by accusing him of being violent toward her, as far as I know, this is the first one. So in that way it would have changed public opinion of Johnny. Kind of textbook defamation.
I’m reaching free Brittany levels. This is so unbelievably unfair to Johnny Depp. It’s infuriating. He better win.
That's the best line about this whole sitch rofl
Yes let’s free him.
Exactly my thoughts.
It's Britney dude.
He's definitely winning
Man, the fact that her lawyers "heresay"ed so much of what Johnny said and then have the nerve to bring up literal articles of hearsay and just read titles is absolutely embarassing
It's not about having nerve. It's about telling one side of a story from every angle. You don't have to like it.
@@lambdaman3228 It’s not about liking it it’s about legal procedure lmao. I mean, the amount of objections sustained in this clip alone speaks for itself. You Don’t consider every angle of perspective when making an objective conclusion. Angles lacking in validity are rightfully thrown away. Literal Tabloid articles have no place in court as evidence. It Is about nerve because the lawyer’s making a ridiculous move.
It’s a PATHETIC ATTEMPT OF HEARSAY! Lol
@@anomienormie8126 > I mean, the amount of objections sustained in this clip alone speaks for itself
Does it? The jury was present for all of those questions. Regardless of if JD answered the questions, the jury saw and heard each question, left unanswered, and all and the implication of it. You say it speaks for itself and I agree, but I think it's speaking different things to each of us. I see it as a brilliant legal strategy to plant thoughts into the jury's mind.
I don't think it will work, but I think they have a weak defense anyway so props to them for trying something.
> You Don’t consider every angle of perspective when making an objective conclusion.
Yes, you do.
> Angles lacking in validity are rightfully thrown away.
Yes, but you have to consider them to determine if they are valid or not, hence you consider the totality of angles.
> Literal Tabloid articles have no place in court as evidence.
In a defamation case they absolutely do have a place. Tabloids are where fame or "defamation" is propagated.
Its hearsay btw :)
I love how everyone in the 'audience' laughs when dep say "you read that very well"
This lawer is just wasting time it seems
I’m surprised Heard’s lawyers are referring tabloids to make his case. That’s real substance right there
I couldn't agree more.
Objection, hearsay!
Did they use the recording of her abusing him?
That's why they are called Tabloids. They are the reason for Princess Diana's accident and untimely death to many suicides. They don't have truth in them
Her lawyer has nothing else, he is desperate and it shows, he is trying to frustrate Johnny and make him show anger while he is on the stand so he can bring some form of doubt to the jury, in efforts to turn the case in favor of Amber... it's all her lawyer got, he know she is lying, but he is just as dead inside as she is and will not quit, he is just waiting and hoping for a slip up by Johnny or some other witness so the jury can have doubt and he can feed the doubt... I'm happy Johnny isn't allowing the lawyer rush him and keeps talking as he tries to talk over him(if he can get Johnny to just stick to the yes and no answering, with no extra comments, the chances are higher to turn the case the way her lawyer want it, if he cant keep Johnny from saying extra comments, he tries talk over in hope's the jury doesnt hear him). I'm happy that Johhny continues to respond the way he wants..
My brain is melting at the fact that this lawyer very seriously thought it would be effective to use tabloid articles against Depp. I cannot believe what I just witnessed
whats more bothering is that the court allows the use of reading tabloid news as evidence or whatever, really newspapers in court from some punk ass journalist ?
I find it insulting toward the jurees to think them so dumb that they would believe blindly tabloids "tease tittles" and that wouls be enought to influence them in a serious court case. And for a lawyer to use tabloids to counter DEFFAMATION trial (guys seriously lol). Amber Heard at best have bi polar disorders or at worst is a narcissic pervert manipulator. Either need treatment and to be estrained from coming close EVER to Johnny Depp or any memeber of his relatives. Cause she clearly have an obsession against him. When money isn't your interest (wich is not her case obviously) you just brake up with the person and never want to have anything to do with it. You don't try to destroy his image or his reputation.
wheres the repiles? im curious
it is a SUPER common trick in courts to re-read yellow (also known as fictional or sci-fi) press tabloid titles to divert from the punchline that actually misleads the reason why case exists in the first place - in other words an 8-step routine and its old like a roman empire old:
1. read fictional titles -
2. belittle the true reason for a case -
3. switch to pointless reason on the fly -
4. demand to accept that is the only reason -
5. lock plaintiff in a loop by endless speculations -
6. enforce the pointless reason -
7. convince the jury that plaintiff made a mistake -
8. win the case -
rightttt its bazaar
The fact that everyone can see her bullying tactics everywhere - even through her legal team, that being through attempted humiliation and berating to try and make Johnny break, is clearly lost on these people.
Top comment. That is all they have; more 'humiliation'.
They are trying to make Johnny snap during the trial so the whole world will see what monster AH turned him into. I feel bad for Mr.Depp
Tho if you want to disprove defamation its a good tactic. If they show that his reputation was already horrible then they effectively show she couldnt do any substantial damage to it. Its horrible but effective
@@grubii-sakuga974 The fact that we all look past what people have done in the past. This better obtain to Johnny too. He hurts himself from time to time with his addiction, but not others. There are so many people who publicly have said I used to have an addiction but I don't now. But what does his addiction have to do with not abusing that whatever she is?
I mean it's pretty hard for a lawyer to polish a turd
Reading tabloid headlines is part of their defence?!? WTF...he is an international celebrity, clearly smack has been written about him and his life since he became famous! Are Amber’s lawyers qualified and educated...that should be a headline itself!!!
Never seen a lawyer take such a big L before. That was literally terrible
“Was miss Heard associated to the claims the same day she made the claims?” Wtf was this lawyer on??
@Panda Banana hahaha good one😂
‘Hold my beer” -Marsha Clark
BIG FACTS
Trae, did you watch the Rittenhouse trial? It was worse than this.
I’m embarrassed for the defense. Are they really using gossip and tabloid articles as a defense?
Edit: I understand why they did it. It’s just embarrassing to see them grasping at anything they can to paint Johnny into a bad light, no matter the “source.”
Cringe worthy isn't it 😂🙄
If they had factual evidence, they wouldn’t be.
Yes they are. I keep wondering when I'm going to find out this a badly done movie of the week. ( That shows my age huh ? )
Oh look at poor Amber. She looks like she's been beat down so many times.
Im surprised they didnt shout hearsay lol
I just love hearing his lawyer say ‘objection’ and then the judge immediately agree with ‘sustained’. Never gets old
Amen lol.
@Josh Smith lol when does tgat happen?
@@CarlosBruguera he asked a question to Johnny’s butler, then when the butler began to answer, the lawyer said “objection hearsay” 🤡
@@emperor8716 lol but what second in the video does that happen at?
@@CarlosBruguera not in this video, i think
This is wat it looks like when you literally have NO DEFENSE 😂 can’t tell if lawyers are trash or just trying to make something out of nothing
Kinda hard to defend someone who lies while under oath
Using tabloids as part of your evidence in court is laughable 😂
Pathetic right 🤣🤣🤣
I didn't get what he said when they laughed tbh
Definitely, it's scraping the bottom of the barrel!
Genuinely can't believe this is real
At this point they're only trying to sway the jury and trying to indirectly virtue signal.
Amber turd’s legal team are embarrassing
She's pathetic
Yeah, they are just as embarrassing as Amber 💩
1000 percent NOT ready for prime time.
so is her fake ass attempt of appearing like a proper lady
I’m waiting for that name to catch on
Every time Johnny cracks a joke, you can feel the jury trying to hold back a laugh
Who’s the jury and where are they? I’m unfamiliar with the seating arrangements
@@adamg7776 they are sitting in the chairs across from johnny
@@rollinOnCode I believe that's the gallery I don't think the jury was shown.
@@adamg7776 the jury is off camera. They don’t put the jury on camera.
And he should have been strongly advsed by the judge to stop it.
Her attorneys are doing a fantastic job of tanking her case against Johnny.
“I believe that’s hearsay-your favorite word” Awesome. I will always support JD. He got himself entangled with a terrible woman.
Laughed so hard
Entangled just like will smith’s wife , she love to call affairs entanglement.
Thanks for your utmost love and support has brought me this far, it has been a hard time for me going through this, but your love and support keeps me going and standing strong in this difficult times.
The fact that the lawyer is trying to use tabloids is insane. Its pathetic. Johnny is an innocent man.
I think the preferred term is "not guilty"
@@brosef4154 yes he is.
@@brosef4154 it is not a criminal case lol. He ain’t the one on trial either lol. She is.
@@brosef4154 No one ever is
The line of questioning was not effective, but I think what the lawyer was trying to establish was that Depp had already done damage to his reputation before Heard's piece was ever published. That's why he kept pointing to articles that preceded hers.
Why is this lawyer so unfriendly? Is this a strategy? I can't imagine this having any beneficial effect on Amber's side but maybe I don't understand courtroom strategies.
I don't think her lawyer understands courtroom strategies.
The opposition are always unfriendly to those they are against. At 15, I was ripped into by a grown mans defence. They didn't care. Repeating over, over and over again "you wanted to kiss him didn't you?", "you asked for him to kiss you, didn't you?". I was 14 (Christmas night, 1998) when the incident happened, forget the fact the man was older than my Dad. I was treated like a liar and a bit of a 'goer'. I lost faith in the system when he was found not guilty. I'm 37 and I still won't get into a black taxi by myself. When I get a private taxi, even though they are logged, I txt the ID number to my husband, or other family member.. just in case.
EDIT: Sorry.. 38, not long had my b/day.
@@teenybabs I'm so sorry this happened to you... Unfortunately in this world it's often the victims who are blamed for their aggression, and people like Amber Heard who will lie and try to make money out of false accusations, are making it even more difficult for the real victims to speak.
lawyers are often somewhat aggressive, often against the innocent party.
He want to make JD lose his temper, that way he may show he is indeed violent or short tempered even in courtroom. JD knowing this didn't let that happend and paciently answered all the "questions"
JD is so on point with everything that comes out of his mouth. Not once did he waver in the entire trial!!!
The way the lawyer doesn’t let him speak is a great proof that he’s not easily irritated and aggressively responding 😌 I would be already mad if I was Johnny constantly interrupted hahahaha
That’s what they are trying to do - aggravating and being provocative is their only way to win, but Depp isn’t giving in so easily… or at all.
@@slavyori2140 agreed. they tried and tried to provoke him. if he is a violent, aggressive human being in nature, he would have retaliate. hey, even non violent people has limit, but here we can clearly see how calm and relax JD was... it's really against what AH and most media portrayed him. we can check on how JD in so many talked show... he is indeed gentle and a calm person; always in deep thought before responding to any questions and any act...
His tactic is try to get Johnny angry to demonstrate aggression unfortunately Johnny is a Class Act
@@adryaniha459 No, its just about how much youre willing to endure. Someone can be super violent and abusive when nobody is watching and then be a charismatic darling when they are.
Yes yes yes. I would’ve shoved the mic down his throat already. Very very stressing all these thrown accusations.
This guy managed to ask questions for 12 minutes and not get a single relevant answer o.o That's actually kind of impressive. I'm pretty sure most people would ask a good question even by accident
It really was just the same question but asked in a dozen slightly different ways. All in ways to spin him into whatever warped story they need it to be..
That's a point...lol... He's a bumbling fool, that's for sure. He's like the Mr. Bean of lawyering !
His only tactic as this point is "he was drunk sometimes and did drugs sometimes so therefore Heard is credible". He should not have been allowed to bring up so many irrelevant tabloid articles in this session.
@@jesteredGesture when I was trying for army, they did the same. In that test were 30 questions, but when I got them, i understood, that there are actualy 10 questions.. Fortunately, i got through. But I dont think that, ms Heards lawyer did know what he is doing. Acusations based on gossips. WTF?
He was hoping to use the questions to call for a legal conclusion, probably figured that if he asks enough Johnny and his team would get tired and make a misstep. If I was judge on this case I would tell him that if his next question was irrelevant or objectionable in any way he would be done.
This whole sequence of questions could have been summed up with “did people write defamatory things about you?”
“Yes, they did”
Exactly what I thought watching this nonsense. Never have I heard the word "sustained" used so much and it truly made me smile
Yep all this proves is that Amber's whole defense team have Nothing on Johnny. they are desperately trying to just make him look bad, but that chuckle from the audience in the court when Johnny threw facts back at the Lawyer shows how they all see that the media and defamatory stuff is BS. People today know what the media are all about, they will drag a celeb's name through the mud just for headlines.
Any logical person had only got to look at facts when it comes to Johnny Depp's career in Hollywood, sure he has substance abuse issues and drug addiction problems he is "human" afterall, but there has never been a single story even a rumor of anykind of abuse of women, by Johnny Depp. When a movie star is a A-hole you hear many stories of thier bad behaviour over years just like Weinstein.
the point is if Johnny was a abuser of women and real A-hole/SOB you would have heard things come out by now especially from his ex wives, Vanessa and Winona would be having a field day by now with the metoo movement. theres been nothing when it's come to Johnny Depp and his exes have been in full support of him that says alot.
@@SabrinaLWilliams “Crisis” , “Allegedly” , “Reportedly” … the lawyers brought this to court?! A male judge would have asked Counsel to approach. If I was presiding I would not have tolerated tabloid gossip in my courtroom. Her Honour is patient.
INdeed. It did not go anywhere.
-"Did I read this gossip article correctly?"
-"Yes, you did."
Apart from the the fact that this lawyer has good reading skills, we did not learn anything from it.
@@RaikenXion He's the one suing her for her alleged "defamatory" article that caused him his job. Her lawyer is showing the jury that he was bust before the article was published. He's pretty effective to be honest with you. I say this and I'm not a fan of Amber.
Love the way he still smiles..Please give the guy a break , his trying to stay strong
Let me get this right. The lawyer of Heard is reading Depp hostile articles from gossip magazines like it's established science from New England Journal of Medicine? Wow.
I think he’s going to try and say that Depp had a chance to sue those articles for defamation but only chose to sue her perhaps in suggesting that he had troubles before Amber but only came out when she reportedly confirmed them………..Which is pretty bogus because all of those are called tabloid trash for a reason.
He probably knew or didn’t care to go after Wa. Post because it would cost a ton of money and they ran the article according to her supposed account of their relationship.
However, I’d suggest he only sued her instead of the others because her article basically confirmed the trash in all of those previous articles.
Anyways, I don’t know much about this case at……..just commenting on this particular clip
@@LA-pg6ud around 7:10 i think that’s what they tried
@@LA-pg6ud Well, let's hope the jury sees trough that crap so it backfires on Heard and her team of evil. Any reasonable person should have the natural ability to brush that off as trash "journalism".
He's trying to establish that Depp's reputation was damaged prior to the op-ed that Depp is suing Heard over. Depp is claiming that Heard's op-ed shifted public perception of him and led to him losing his role in Pirates. Heard's defence is presenting these tabloid articles as proof that his reputation was already damaged
Probably the same folks that voted for Biden.
So what her lawyer is trying to prove is that she didn't ruin his career in the 2018 article because she already ruined it starting 4 years earlier. Gotcha.
But that is all the lawyer needs to prove.
@@Guitar387 I dont think her lawyers are supposed to set her up as the villain this way. Just like them trying to say its okay that she beat him up because he was an addict. That's not a good defense. Them proving she ruined his career on a larger scale than the one article isn't a good defense.
When AH presents her case things are going to get rough. His salvation lies in a full consumption by the 11 jurors of the full, unredacted audio tapes of their fights particularly her visit to him on the so-called Uber recording where she repeatedly returns to taunt and degrade him. He's obviously under the influence but repeatedly ties to help her and shows genuine concern.
Civil trials in California do not require an unanimous verdict
@@douglasmoffat1538 im pretty sure this is in court in one of the Virginias
🎯
This lawyer is really reaching. The Judge keeps sustaining the objections and you can see Amber is getting frustrated that they keep getting shot down.
Yeah Amber definitely does not strike me as an nintellectual individual.
Exactly. It's probably due to Amber insisting he reach.
*Amber wanted to divorce him after her shock at how many influencers were gossiping against her husband because she didn't want to constantly defend his honour.*
Lawyer doesn't care they are objected to. He gets to ask these probing questions and plant them in the jury's mind. He knows full well they will be objected.
I feel sorry for the lawyers they had to defend a bunch of lies of a horrible woman. But also they are horrible at lawyering. So many questions and he got nowhere
They had full right to refuse to support her lies. They voluntarily jumped on the bandwagon. They ridiculed themselves through their own greed. They deserve no pity.
This attorney is a joke! I can’t believe this is being allowed in a court! WE STAND BY YOU JOHNNY!!
This is the worst one
Absolutely ridiculous 🙄 lawyer grasping at anything they can to pull Johnny down , they are a joke 🤔
Yes. She’s so mean that poor baby she has
Well said.
Glad this case is televised. People can tell for themselves
The amount of objections in this and the lawyer tripping over himself is so... SO bad. So humiliating for the lawyer 😂
Her counsel are very aggressive, even for cross. Hence his lawyers can repeatedly accuse them of harassment, which they did here.
He was tripping like Jack Sparrow with a jar of dirt.
Bro don't even know what he reading
Isn't all this hearsay?
@@marksdathorne Sustained
So the attorney obnoxiously screams “HERE-SAY” everytime Johnny speaks, but yet here’s the same attorney referring to tabloid and gossip magazines that are notoriously not credible- and this doesn’t qualify as here-say?
First of all it's spelled hearsay
💯
@@voidsabre_really.....
There's a special place in hell for people that wist language aka lawyers :)))
@@Akira-rm5sb pwnd
One of my favorite actors of all times. And I like what he's doing in the music scene that's cool. He's such a kind man ❤
You got to love Johnny’s sense of humor. What a guy!!!! Justice for Johnny.
I have'nt been a great fan of JD....but that AH is one nasty piece of work the poor guy does not deserve this...hope this backfires on her badly. Got to agree with you about his sense of humour & defo Justice for Johnny !!
If I were a juror in this case I’m be pissed at the idiot defense lawyer. He’s wasting everyone’s time and just making her look worse. It’s infuriating lol
The lawyer is making quite a fool of himself and so is his colligue. I hope the jury will recognize that and make their verdict accordingly. He probably doesn't know himself what he wants to prove with these newspaper articles. They have zero significance. But they obviously don't have anything better up their sleeve.
Shows the defense attorney has NOTHING.
I find it hilarious.
this trial is ridiculous
@Lisa - Also, it's his pathetic attempt to steal the attention from his incompetence and JD with getting his cheap 15 minutes of fame. 🤡
I hope the Jury can see how crazy this woman is and what Johnny has had to deal with. He deserves to be happy again and free from this woman and her drama.
Amen
Read somewhere that if she loses she will appeal
@ BOARD MEETINGS..👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼❤️. I second that!
Crazy. Is nothing. The manipulation and sheer narcissism is unbelievable. She's playing mind games for the world to see by dressing like him in court as well.
My ex was ) is exactly like that. They think they can actually become the person they're attempting to slander and will slip right into the person that they want to be and are attacking.
Her counsel are clowns !!!! "Sustained, sustained, sustained....etc !!!" Her legal team must really just feel like they have no ammunition at all after being shut down over and over and over again !!!!
Her legal team is as arrogant and unintelligent as she is! It’s lovely watching an attorney dig his/her own hole over and over again. He objected to his own question! 🤣🤣🤣. That’s beyond phenomenal.
It's more that her legal team is so desperate to win or at least minimize the damage to her rep. Sometimes as a lawyer you have to go through such lengths.
😂😂😂😂😂
maybe her team is just tired of Amber too
What do you expect them to do when they know she is digging her own grave. They are doing their best LMAO
Amber stink rubs of on them 💩
When objections to your lawyer’s questions are 100% sustained by the judge…you’re obviously not seeking justice in the legal sense. You’re putting on a show for the jury.
it should be sanctioned as well. if you rack em up like he does, he's just putting opinions out there.
Even when he's asking questions, he's not asking question, these are statements, with "correct" added. No search for information.
Furthermore; he's constantly mixing expressions, to trip up witnesses ; he does it in other clips as well; "from any other witness than Ms Heard, have you any reason to believe..." - either you heard it from someone (hear-say) or you have reason to believe, not both. Crazy that it's allowed.
Just hope the jury sees it for what it is...
@@brmbkl Exactly. It's honestly insane how he's just allowed to abuse hear-say with literally no consequence. They can't make any sort of progress in the case when the second Depp is recalling something from a third party, there's immediate objection.
It's on purpose. Just because a judge sustains an objection doesn't mean that the jury will ignore the question or the implication that they're trying to make against him, even though they're not supposed to give it any consideration.
@@shade9272 I realize that. But at what point should a judge become proactive and warn a lawyer against a certain pattern of inappropriate questions? After 10 sustained objections? 100? 1,000? One of the judge’s roles is to prevent irrelevant lines of questioning that prejudice a jury.
@@kenmaingot exactly, she could have shut down this guys inane time wasting poorly executed attempt at pulling a fast one on the jury at any point but chose not to.
Amber's lawyer is the perfect example of how ridiculous people look when they "do their research" in the tabloids and unreviewed websites.
He looks a baffoon too. Classic midwestern dump american, by face.
Pretty much Western 4th Wave Feminism in a nutshell.
I don't think people in the comments section understand that this is a 'defamation' suit. Meaning Johnny Depp is suing Amber Heard for the bad tabloid image she gave of him after they separated, saying that this ruined his career. It makes sense for the defense lawyer to show all the extremely negative press he was already getting before Amber Heard did/ said anything. There's context here in the nature of the case. You don't seem to understand this. He's not using these articles to prove Johnny Depp is a bad person, he's showing these to show Johnny Depp was already getting very bad press before Amber Heard's statements.
@@axelle32 Makes sense actually. It’s probably a sound strategy, however the belligerence and rudeness of the lawyer is just making them look awful.
There is a jury which is seeing JD look great and AH look absolutely terrible. 🤷🏾♂️
Great point. What kind of evidence is a pile of heresay?
Anyone else notice when Rottenborn objected to his own question, we never heard another word out of him?? 😂
I'm not a lawyer by any means, but using tabloid headlines as evidence (I assume to enrage a famously unflappable guy) after objecting to 'hearsay' at every opportunity is an ... interesting strategy.
He's trying to establish that Depp's reputation was damaged prior to the op-ed that Depp is suing Heard over. Depp is claiming that Heard's op-ed altered public perception of him and led to him losing his role in Pirates. Heard's defence is presenting these tabloid articles as proof that Depp's reputation was already damaged
I think he’s trying to prove Depp is more destructive to his own career than heard ever was because this is specifically the defamation case. He’s just doing a terrible job. Do lawyers in one team not read over each other’s questions ??
@@emsa5034 now that you mention this, I can see this strategy too. It just doesn't come across as such if you don't have experience as a lawyer and are just watching. In this case it's just one dude reading headlines and another going "wtf, why are you reading them out loud for me?" for 12 min straight.
@@emsa5034 How would the tabloids know this?
@@leesteal4458 The lawyer is pointing out that Amber Heard made accusations in 2016 and got a restraining order against Johnny Depp for domestic abuse in 2016, he then highlights with numerous tabloids headlines his decline. Which supports the idea that Amber Heard story about abuse in 2018, isn't the reason he has lost all movie roles, his lost of roles and demise started before that.
"Did I read that right?"
"Did I read that correctly?"
This is hilarious, it's amusing to watch this lawyer make a fool of himself daily. 😅
Love this 'evidence' selection too. Tabloids are such a reliable source of factual information! 😂
Hilarious to see that's what her lawyer thinks is factual information! Craziness!
Supermarket tabloids have only one good use......privey paper (outhouse toilet paper)
"You read that very very well".
You don't understand the context lol
Is the lawyer from Florida? 🙃
The way she tries so hard to look sad and innocent all the time in court, cracks me up every time 😂
And how when you actually pay attention to her microexpressions you can see compounding levels of pissedness and disdain
@@Daffodillon and she breaks character 100 times infront of camera
I love how I wrote this and then listened to the psychologist talk about her having borderline and histrionic PD. My years OS self study are really paying off
She is just imitating humans with her expressions , she doesnt have any emotions…. Except crazy!!👍
You're not that good an actress, love.
“You read that very very well”loooool
The amount of times that his questions were objected is embarrassing. He kept asking the same question just in a different form.
And can you blame him?
Keep reminding the Jury about the hit pieces. Keep showing him passed out, bad texts e.t.c.
It's a smear campaign and is very effective. Destroy his credibility and the rest becomes much easier.
Sadly Depp was ahead the tactic and used a couple of moments to charm the courts
Sounds like customer service for unknown banks
It's called being a lawyer. They have to word their questions carefully.
Travesty.
If he’d answer them without sounding drunk may help.
"Yes, how did they know?" And the audience lost it 😂😂😂😂
Her lawyer literally hurts my brain. He will object every thing depps lawyer says and when he himself gets objected he just keeps going with the same questions and won’t stop and gets mad when the judge sustains depps lawyers objections. This is embarrassing to watch her lawyer ask questions.
It was really annoying when they brought in the butler. Heard’s lawyer went on for like fifteen minutes asking about if Johnny’s team asked for the pictures, and then when Johnny’s lawyers asked the exact same questions, but about Heard’s team, Heard’s lawyer objected to every single question. Even though they were literally the exact same questions, just with Depp’s name swapped in for Amber Heard’s. Like even the wording was exactly the same. It was so annoying. I honestly do feel like her lawyers are hurting her case just by being more annoying than Depp’s team.
His strategy atm is to confuse JD to get him to confess to something he's never done. While it works in some cases, in this case it only makes him look like a clown.
@@OneFinalAutumn honestly my main problem with her team is they won’t let him talk when they ask him a question. Than get mad when he tries to answer.
They're desperate.
Another thing I would say is Johnny seems like someone who wants to put everything in front of the jury and anyone who is watching whether it makes him
look bad or whatever. But Amber’s legal team won’t let him give context which is pissing me off as someone who wasn’t there context can make all the difference. When you ask someone a question that’s not a yes or no and to describe something, let them describe it. The only reason they are objecting because they know it makes her look bad.
Love how the lawyer said " In fact you waited until Amber wrote the OP-Ed before you went to clear your name?" Isnt this the OP-ED they keep saying that Amber didn't write. Good job on Ambers team!
This attorney doesn’t even let him reply in his defense, so unfair to him
He’s trying so hard to drag Johnny down so he feels like a big man! He’s pathetic! GO JOHNNY!
thats because he know better ✋🤣
I said the same thing on here on another clip, and there was people saying he doesn't have to as he's a lawyer. 🙄🙄🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
I think someone needs to nail that AH lawyer to his chair. He's ridiculous
Yes he is, his question is “did I read this correctly?” It’s a yes or a no
It's like her lawyer just learned how to read and is so proud to show it off.
When Johnny responded "You read that very well" he sounded like he was praising his child 😂
Reading doesn't mean comprehension let alone discernment of truth from tabloid gossip rags.
🤣😂🤣
What a joke on how the Heard attorneys are trying to simply embarrass JD. So pathetic. He handled it beautifully.
Of course it's wrong. Some people study law to help truth be discovered. Other people, like this laughable lawyer, are simply egotistical, selfish, unethical mercenaries.
I bet when Rottenborn went home for the day he put on Pirates of the Caribbean, hugged the TV, and cried.
😂😂😂
The absolute insanity of using random defamatory tabloid articles as 'evidence' in a court of law. Where the hell did Amber find her legal team, Facebook marketplace??
Strategy. The goal is not to influence the judge, but the jury. In case the members of the jury have never seen those headlines, it's important for the defense to bring them up in an attempt to impeach Johnny's character.
@@Angelsilhouette But even then, it's a middle-school debate club strategy, because literally everyone with half a brain KNOWS that articles about celebrities are pure speculation with clickbait titles. So all that Amber's legal team are doing is making themselves look desperate/like they have no real evidence, and the Jury will just doubt Amber's case even more.
Because he making it a point that the same tabloids that wrote about his abuse on AH can take words and twist them around . Which is what he is using to proof that she had nothing to do with Disney or other money he lost. Due to journalists writing false stories or dramatizing a story to make it more appealing to the market.
@@daisyplease5823 but he was still working when all these "articles" were written. The point isn't to show that others also defamed him. That is admitting guilt in a trial that exists solely to decide if she defamed him. Other people did it first so it doesn't count? Nonsense.
I agree but why didnt the judge allow it in???