VSEPR Theory Part 2: Trigonal Bipyramidal Family

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 358

  • @basicconcepts5010
    @basicconcepts5010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    He explains it to the simplest method because he understands the concepts very well. He is young but has the ART in teaching. A teacher can not give what he does not have. The reason why many students struggle with chemistry. Books are very hard to understand also.

  • @profssrfunk
    @profssrfunk 10 ปีที่แล้ว +246

    can you replace my chemistry professor please?

  • @fluffymarshmellows0218
    @fluffymarshmellows0218 8 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    tf when your teacher can't teach so you have watch TH-cam videos to pass the class ;(

    • @TheSoulEater12345678
      @TheSoulEater12345678 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      fluffymarshmellows02 so true

    • @Peter_1986
      @Peter_1986 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I once actually passed a test in Differential Equations just by studying problems on the "Paul's Online Math Notes" site for a few weeks, lol.

    • @armageddon.4488
      @armageddon.4488 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      True

    • @user-py8yk8nq3m
      @user-py8yk8nq3m 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      fluffymarshmellows02 that's exactly what I came here to see if anyone would say

    • @hisyamhasbi8257
      @hisyamhasbi8257 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Im pretty sure the majority of students now learn more from online videos rather than their classes. (At least for the basics, not so sure about the next level stuff)

  • @tdewitt451
    @tdewitt451  11 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Yeah, that's a good point. In the future, I'll try to make a video that discusses the difference between molecular geometry and electron geometry. Thanks for your suggestion.

    • @samuraijosh1595
      @samuraijosh1595 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@lipika1406 sad that he's gone from TH-cam.... :/

    • @theapostolictribes
      @theapostolictribes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      thank you

    • @anukriti7511
      @anukriti7511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@samuraijosh1595 he's back!

    • @theapostolictribes
      @theapostolictribes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I just came back to say thank you and God bless you. I made an A in chemistry last semester where everyone was complaining of not doing well. despite the fact that I couldn't submit 3 assignments and you and a few others were the ones God used for me(only went to other channels if I don't see a video on the topic in your channel because your explanations always did the magic)
      please write a chemistry text book that would explain things the way you do In videos.

    • @karishmakaur3578
      @karishmakaur3578 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theapostolictribes hey could you share the different resources you used? Thanks in advance ☺️

  • @Hugs_4_Bugs_
    @Hugs_4_Bugs_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    It's videos like this that remind me chemistry isn't hard, most people just don't teach it very well. My professor teaches it like she's reviewing stuff you should already know and it's annoying asf. The way you break it down and build up to the point of it all is how chemistry should be taught.

  • @tdewitt451
    @tdewitt451  11 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Hey everyone, I'm here to help. If you have any questions or just want to learn more, click on the link in the description above. It'll take you to a page where you can ask me questions.

  • @pauldcunha488
    @pauldcunha488 9 ปีที่แล้ว +198

    Thank man,, because of you I got a 100 on my Chemistry final at MIT

    • @scottpark8455
      @scottpark8455 8 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      MIT that easy?

    • @emmanuelwinston8817
      @emmanuelwinston8817 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Anvay pancholia, You mean grade 11 students right?

    • @skadoosh7398
      @skadoosh7398 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Emmanuel Winston yes

    • @redwanmohammed5029
      @redwanmohammed5029 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Here in Canada we're learning this in grade 10. So basically 14 and 15 year olds are learning this. It doesn't matter when u learn something in school, it matters if you're learning it before or after other students :D

    • @gilbertthegreat6609
      @gilbertthegreat6609 5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      In Soviet Russia, this learns you

  • @theonewitheverything
    @theonewitheverything 8 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    You should make a video on hybridization.

  • @RisenApe
    @RisenApe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    This is how chemistry should be taught!! Love you!!

  • @greenlizardballs
    @greenlizardballs 10 ปีที่แล้ว +310

    im crying inside from how great this is

    • @sanaabdulrehman604
      @sanaabdulrehman604 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ikr!!!!!!!

    • @jamorant7132
      @jamorant7132 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fr

    • @jamorant7132
      @jamorant7132 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      7 years ago still no replies

    • @jadjohnny
      @jadjohnny ปีที่แล้ว

      He's way better than my current professor, no shade, just scientific facts 😂

  • @dylancho4389
    @dylancho4389 8 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Put it on 2x speed, and you're golden.

  • @shadabangel7460
    @shadabangel7460 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    thank you for this video very much. please make a video on VBT and MOT theory

  • @sanadayuki8775
    @sanadayuki8775 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    10:53 so the molecule is really creatively called a T-SHAPE molecule ) xD)
    Never laughed so hard while studying before

  • @zigglyz7120
    @zigglyz7120 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Best explanation on VSEPR theory till now. I love the way you teach, unlike other teachers who make these things complicated and only focus on memorising. Thanks a ton❤

  • @SmrithiSony
    @SmrithiSony 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Tyler DeWitt...........you are awesome! I had absolutely no idea about the concept of VSEPR theorum even after learning it in school and at a coaching centre...........but you could wipe awy all my doubts in just half an hour.....I thank you and i am grateful to you for making this so simple.....keep up the good videos!!(Y)

  • @sheenaturqueza1913
    @sheenaturqueza1913 10 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    our teacher taught this for one week and you taught it in minutes 😩 thank youu

  • @prakashvasan2334
    @prakashvasan2334 10 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    why it is always that bonds of equatorial atoms are replaced by pair of electron and not by axial bond????????

    • @kcwilliams07
      @kcwilliams07 10 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The angles between equatorial atoms are 120 degrees where as the axial atoms are only 90 degrees apart. Since the electrons repel, the molecule will keep the shape with the greatest distance between electron domains. Replacing axial atoms keeps more distance between atoms than replacing equatorial ones.

    • @DiptoSalam
      @DiptoSalam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      IT WAS IN MY MIND!THANK YOU SOSOSOSO MUCH!I AM DANCING NOW WITH JOY!❤❤

    • @samuraijosh1595
      @samuraijosh1595 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kcwilliams07 wait....did you mean "replacing equatorial atoms". Please come back and clarify I'm confused, lol.

  • @fula6410
    @fula6410 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    can you do a video for hybridization please

  • @OpGaming-re5sq
    @OpGaming-re5sq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is how I have learn structure of molecule easily .thanks teacher

  • @brianportner7063
    @brianportner7063 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    AMAZING - thank you! Much appreciated. Makes a lot more sense now. :) Now headed to your video on octahedrals...

  • @meaabolencia4390
    @meaabolencia4390 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    hello, i really want to thank you for this and every videos u did! God bless you!

  • @supipilekamge3270
    @supipilekamge3270 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You're a literal angel. The lessons are so simple and easy to understand. Thank you very much!

  • @herstory4768
    @herstory4768 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thank u so much sir. you're awesome.
    but in linear shape why do lone pairs not push the bonds downwards ??how can they have 180 angles ??please explain.

    • @valerievhytie
      @valerievhytie 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      the two chlorine atoms facing each other cancel out

  • @SirajumMunir009
    @SirajumMunir009 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    you're really good,i get my chemistry teacher's lecture again from you

    • @SirajumMunir009
      @SirajumMunir009 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i've a question too. how do i get the last one 180 degree. i mean how do i understand the repultion of 3 lp will make it to 180 degree

    • @AkashChandraGupta
      @AkashChandraGupta 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sirajum Munir The net repulsion from three lone pairs cancels out each other and it results in no bending. Think of tug war when rope is pulled with same force from either side, then rope doesn't move. Hope that's understandable.

  • @legendary_chicken
    @legendary_chicken 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The effort that has been put into making this is very much appreciated

  • @gudiyasingh6780
    @gudiyasingh6780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    U are superbly awesome sir I understood the concept very well just because of you . love from india🥰🥰

  • @Mary-yh2pm
    @Mary-yh2pm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you are so smart Sir . Thank you so much , i now understand this topic .

  • @abuduzanatalukdar1979
    @abuduzanatalukdar1979 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So easy to understand from a great teacher.

  • @where.is.m
    @where.is.m 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish I found out about you sooner, you are extremely helpful and amazing at what you do. Thank you!

  • @thing33100
    @thing33100 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    why doesn't one of the lone pairs replace one of the axle atom, instead only replace the the equatorial atoms?

    • @tanishaverghese9832
      @tanishaverghese9832 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Suuuperr late...but they experience less repulsion that way....for example in SF4 with a see-saw shaped geometry, one lone pair and four bond pairs, the lone pair in the equatorial position can distance itself better from the others, decreasing the repulsion. (Lonepair lone pair repulsion> bond pair lone pair repulsion, > bond pair bond pair repulsion.)

  • @stephengevanni8315
    @stephengevanni8315 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why do the lone pairs exert a greater repulsive force on the bond pairs than the bond pairs do on each other? Many thanks for the awesome video!

    • @himanshukathayat2744
      @himanshukathayat2744 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Stephen Gevanni it's because lone pair of electrons is under the influence of only one nucleus so the electron cloud will take more space and have more ability to repel whereas the bonded pair of electrons are under the influence of the 2 nucleus n there space of electron cloud is limited n hence there repelling power is limited

  • @almagm1
    @almagm1 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    May you please do videos on dimensional analysis, mole relationships, and stoichiometry. Your videos are really helpful and are better than khan academy.

  • @anilpandey3664
    @anilpandey3664 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very nice video helped me a lot in understanding the entire concept of VSPER theory

  • @themarschievous
    @themarschievous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    there will never ever be another chem teacher as great as tyler!!!

  • @RahulChatterjeemnop
    @RahulChatterjeemnop 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Tyler my bro, I got a question, why does the lone pairs always acquire the equatorial position? Why do they not occupy the axial positions?

  • @tonytoeknee3192
    @tonytoeknee3192 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do the lone electron pairs ONLY push the bonds of the axial atoms? (to make the angle less)

  • @ryanho9360
    @ryanho9360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Crazy how I'm watching this in 2021. This video is gonna be watched forever.

  • @jasgeo007
    @jasgeo007 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the good tutorial. Why is it that it's the equatorial atoms that are replaced by lone pairs and not the axial atoms?

  • @srv1347
    @srv1347 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man , start teaching for IIT jee , you gon' blow up , we need teachers like you

  • @RavinderKaur-zy3we
    @RavinderKaur-zy3we 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plzz tell me why inert gas like Xe accept electrons

  • @jar0bi
    @jar0bi 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You have saved my grade for my quiz that i'm taking in 2 hours thank you so much!!!

    • @a1axel738
      @a1axel738 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      jarobi flashbacks to crash course physics

  • @ElizaAnne51
    @ElizaAnne51 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this is so much better than my chem prof just yelling at us

  • @sly4u247
    @sly4u247 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is there a specific reason as to why you kept the lone pair in the equatorial and not in the axial positions???

  • @divyanshumehta9229
    @divyanshumehta9229 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello Sir, I had a doubt in how do we get to know from the lewis structures that the the lone pair electrons are axial or equitorial???

  • @amandinedeheneffe8040
    @amandinedeheneffe8040 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos are really nice! I am in my first year at university, and I have an oral exam in chemistry, I understand VSEPR theory but I found it was difficult to explain again to my teacher without any mistakes, so I hope that I will pass without any problems. Thank you. ( Sorry for my english , I come from Belgium)

  • @muftiaaishasuhail3050
    @muftiaaishasuhail3050 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much Tyler brother. you really deserve a best chemistry tutor and professor!
    Thanks for the video, I am the new subscriber!

  • @shubhamvats2140
    @shubhamvats2140 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Why does the lone pair occupies the equitorial position only?

  • @rabunfc
    @rabunfc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if the central atom has one lone pair and one electron which is not bonded then the angle might change what is the answer for it

  • @perfect_es
    @perfect_es 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not all heroes wear capes

  • @kristenott7850
    @kristenott7850 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All of your VSEPR videos have helped me so much in understanding. Thank you so much!

  • @jaskaur7885
    @jaskaur7885 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a chemistry exam in 6 hours and I was struggling to remember all this, but I understand so well now!! Thank you so much, I know I won't have a problem with this in my exam anymore!!! You really explained it so well!

  • @mryab6860
    @mryab6860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why did this guy stopped releasing videos

  • @vanshchoudhary4673
    @vanshchoudhary4673 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have mentioned that that the axial angle will be

  • @madinashabanova677
    @madinashabanova677 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best teacher ever! :) After watching these videos,honestly,I like this topic ,because it seems to me very easy .Really, everything is clear in your speech .Thank you very much !GOOD LUCK!! :)

  • @raanoooshh9296
    @raanoooshh9296 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everything makes perfect sense, as always. Thank you.

  • @melissarosas1177
    @melissarosas1177 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seriously, I have a final coming up and this has NEVER seemed easy. Using all your vids to study. Bless you!

  • @sunithays3494
    @sunithays3494 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you it helped me alot.. awesome.. I need help in reading NMR spectra. I need to find out what compound is present seeing the spectra and I missed my class due to health issues. Do u have any related vedios? plz help

  • @nileshdubey8670
    @nileshdubey8670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Many many helpful ❤️❤️😘😘

  • @shirleybonsu1914
    @shirleybonsu1914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh my God! This guy is a genius.

  • @sacredsyrena680
    @sacredsyrena680 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love you. I am taking chemistry again and this is super helpful!

  • @Dr.priya.kumari
    @Dr.priya.kumari 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    in fcl2 how can we decide which two we need to replace

  • @paralola124
    @paralola124 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so so much Tyler! You and your videos are greatly appreciated! :-)

  • @BrightonYoung
    @BrightonYoung 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The lone pairs look so funny

  • @divyaarora5068
    @divyaarora5068 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How to identify the central atom?
    How to draw vespr structure of BFClBr

  • @ezio1896
    @ezio1896 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir this was the best explanation for vsper theory all my dojbta are cleared now

  • @tasfa10
    @tasfa10 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was taught that lone pairs occupy more space than bonds and therefore they want to be as far as possible from each other. So I don't understand the T-shaped geometry. Why are the lone pairs in equatorial positions next to each other instead of in axial positions at 180º from each other, making a trigonal planar geometry???

  • @assininesyndrome4901
    @assininesyndrome4901 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm taking a class with a professor named Simon Simms at City College. He is a good man, but he can't teach for shit. You have no idea the gratitude and appreciation I have for these videos.

  • @loreadekeye
    @loreadekeye 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    is there a more technical term for the seesaw molecule or is that the only name for it?

    • @tdewitt451
      @tdewitt451  10 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      The technical term is "disphenoidal," but I've honestly never ever heard anyone use it!

    • @yousef5089
      @yousef5089 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Tylerلاع DeWitt

    • @himanshukathayat2744
      @himanshukathayat2744 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tyler DeWitt u just replied.. Woahhhh... That's unbelievable... Okay if u r reading this.... Plz plz plz make more videos on topics like hybridisation MOT... LIKE every topic in the book of an Indian high school student... I can tell u all chapters .. But only if u rply cos then I will know that u read and there is some use of writing such long msgs

    • @ritik1003
      @ritik1003 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Distorted shape

    • @ChrisKyle0104
      @ChrisKyle0104 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tyler DeWitt Sir, you just heard yourself use it XD

  • @ositaokoli2440
    @ositaokoli2440 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks alot
    you re more than a teacher
    i missed this class so i decided to watch it online
    😁😁i feel like missing classes for all semester.
    BRAVO!!!!

  • @vesnyakinci
    @vesnyakinci 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    It´s been 5 years, don´t know if you are checking the comments but dude you fucking saved my life, best explanation ever+you cute. If you also made some molecule orbital theory videos that would have been perfect. Anyway, thank you very very much!

  • @anesaanthony5902
    @anesaanthony5902 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    ïm just learning something new itz like my teacher are sooo stupidd they make simple thingz seem so difficult thankzzz alott tylerrr:-* :) :)# Bestt Teacher

  • @themariofan03
    @themariofan03 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Someone answer FAST. What is the difference between Trigonal bipyramidal and Pyramidal

  • @reaalex
    @reaalex 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looking at the T-shaped molecule, I assume the angle between the equatorial atoms is similar to the 'Seesaw' molecule,

  • @Joe-sr2pm
    @Joe-sr2pm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i love this guy

  • @endstagerstickler55a
    @endstagerstickler55a 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which of your videos would help me with organic chemistry? We are going over the basics, identifying functional groups, etc.

  • @raghadalomari4058
    @raghadalomari4058 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the best tutor ever 👌🌸

  • @theblueskywong3705
    @theblueskywong3705 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation

  • @kolasuhaas8822
    @kolasuhaas8822 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you are our saviour

  • @inovexa4039
    @inovexa4039 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    u r amazing i reallu lve u ur my god!!!!!!!!

  • @tropturd6458
    @tropturd6458 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you tell us what its properties(i.e. boiling point, melting point, solubility, etc.) are? Thanks :)

  • @shlokbodke7184
    @shlokbodke7184 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why isn't PCl5 a square pyramidal structure and why isn't ClF3 a trigonal pyramidal like ammonia as it has 2 pairs of lone electrons which should push the two of its side bonds closer to the third one

  • @jashnikaa
    @jashnikaa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved this video... thankyou so much for a good detailed explanation. ❤️❤️

  • @oldyoutubevideos7430
    @oldyoutubevideos7430 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nobel Please for this guy!

  • @souravpurkait5926
    @souravpurkait5926 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just 1 req.. Plz buy a good clarity camera.. except this you are in the top of my favourite list... *cheers*

  • @bijapureayeshaamanulla783
    @bijapureayeshaamanulla783 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you bro

  • @aadirimal8081
    @aadirimal8081 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the structure of (ICl2)- i.e the Iodine Dichloride ion? Is it linear like XeF2? Help please.

  • @vivianyalung9525
    @vivianyalung9525 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How come they don't follow the octet rule? When will you know if you have to use the octet rule when you're going to build its lewis structure to form the vsper?
    PS. Sorry for the grammar

  • @luiscandy5442
    @luiscandy5442 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    It feels kinda nice not learning from a teacher with broken English and god awful hand writing 😊🙌🏼🙌🏼

  • @rohitSharma-pe6cs
    @rohitSharma-pe6cs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jai shree ram

  • @saikat0511
    @saikat0511 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Books have 2d diagrams which are so damn confusing. You made it so easy!!!!! Here have a 👍

  • @ndjdjdfjxbjxjxjc4007
    @ndjdjdfjxbjxjxjc4007 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Trigonal bipyramidal forms (6) 90 and 3 120 degree angle is that true

  • @sciencenerd7639
    @sciencenerd7639 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this

  • @rishishah7068
    @rishishah7068 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is way better than my coaching material. Hit a LIKE if u agree ..!!!

  • @kubu79
    @kubu79 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    it's kinda annoying how he pronounces equatorial

  • @honeybuckin7458
    @honeybuckin7458 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    this really helped a Pharmacy Student from Germany , so thank you !!

  • @jacksonl.358
    @jacksonl.358 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I conclude that for every molecular structure that has lone pair will have different angle for different molecule?

  • @BURRiah
    @BURRiah 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not sure if you did or not, but you should point out the difference between electron geometry & molecular geometry. When you say, "SF_4 is a seesaw shape," that only refers to its molecular geom... I know you know that but in my CHM course we can get tricked by the wording of questions (EG vs. MG).

  • @starsheepgaming33
    @starsheepgaming33 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I found another one that has five things around a central atom,it is hydrochloric acid. It has one bond and four lone electron pairs. The bond shape is a liner shape.

  • @linlu1222
    @linlu1222 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a difference caused by the axial and equatorial position? Like what causes the angles to be different and not all the same?

  • @-JRohit
    @-JRohit 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Xe is 0 group element how can if bond with F

    • @ronror
      @ronror 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it's Dative Bonding

    • @nuclearwarfareaw
      @nuclearwarfareaw 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Light Yagami huh?

    • @chhavigupta2802
      @chhavigupta2802 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      zero group elements generally don't react but compounds of xenon have been found. It's on the lower end of the group and has higher weight so it does form compounds. It is the only zero group element which reacts.