How The Patriot and Kinzhal Duel in Kyiv's Skies

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 148

  • @Interestingengineeringofficial
    @Interestingengineeringofficial  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
    *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

  • @faisalhs6493
    @faisalhs6493 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Patriot intercepting Kinzhal is comical to say the least.

  • @felipe-vibor
    @felipe-vibor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Khinzal travels at mack 10 ant patriot at mac 5. Something is not making sense here

    • @alexlindsey6446
      @alexlindsey6446 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Research the Khinzal and you will see why it's not a "true" hypersonic missle. That will answer your question. Also, it's important to point out that the intercepting missle (in this case the Patriot) doesn't have to be faster moving than the incoming missle (in this case the Khinzal). Don't think of it as a drag race. The intercepting missle is launched from an area that is (in most cases) much closer to the incoming missle's target. Think of it as a head on smash. The intercepting missle is coming at the Khinzal.... not chasing after it.

    • @felipe-vibor
      @felipe-vibor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexlindsey6446 even google will simply answer you. I suggest you do what you're proposing, research further.
      The speed determine reaction time which is very important in interception. In this case the patriot will be aware of the khinzal too late to counter it. And we've not even spoken of avangard slide vehicle.

    • @NdamuwanepiJohnIshemunyoro
      @NdamuwanepiJohnIshemunyoro 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they are good at propaganda when it comes to how good their weapons are. there is a lot of hype. their missiles have been intercepted several times by old technology@@felipe-vibor

    • @JeanyvesJeudy
      @JeanyvesJeudy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Definitely 😂

    • @mvzdo
      @mvzdo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kkkkkkkkk so?

  • @robertosouza1650
    @robertosouza1650 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Patriot defence system. US billions for nothing.

  • @idarioloureiro3506
    @idarioloureiro3506 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    6 Kinzal interceptes. It should then be easy and in their interest for Ukrania or Americans to show the proof of video, radar tracking and pieces of the destroid e 6 Kinzhal. Where are they?

    • @coreyleander7911
      @coreyleander7911 ปีที่แล้ว

      They have repeatedly displayed fragments of the shot down Kinzhals though. You’re saying the intercept itself should’ve been on video?

    • @edouardbongard
      @edouardbongard 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah and what haleines on déc 14??

    • @danielnowakowski601
      @danielnowakowski601 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@coreyleander7911show me the proof

  • @ottmarhenry3053
    @ottmarhenry3053 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mathematically it doesn’t not add up.

  • @aacvieira
    @aacvieira 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The world inventory of patriot is about 1.4 k launching units. Allegedly usa USA & alies send (most optimistically) 12 to 18 unit of launchers to Ukraine.
    This was sufficient to disrupt all patriot ammunition inventory. Conclusion, the weapon sucks.

  • @VANTYCSolutions
    @VANTYCSolutions 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can someone explain how a system that moves at Mach 4 can intercept another one that moves at Mach 12?

    • @mvzdo
      @mvzdo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its not a runing side by side, They are at oposit directions

    • @yosoydpfknr2855
      @yosoydpfknr2855 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh because you think is a drag race or something? 😂 Do you believe the patriots missile will be running behind the Kinzhal missile? 😂😂 They're call interceptor for a reason. Also after kyiv announced the down of the Kinzhal the FBS arrested 3 Russian scientists involved on the development of the Kinzhal, I wonder why?!

  • @jean-pierredecouvreur9500
    @jean-pierredecouvreur9500 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Has everyone forgotten how the lowly Houthis defeated the mighty Patriot system and put the Saudi Aramco refinery out of action a couple of years ago?

  • @cz1589
    @cz1589 ปีที่แล้ว

    A system is not an all-in battery, there are some misconceptions, often duplicated by media and news streaming. Those 2 new German systems are not independent patriot batteries but additions to existing ones. So, Ukraïne still does have 2 patriot batteries, with newer additions like extra launchers.
    Early 2024, Germany might send 2 extra Iris-T batteries, so independent all-in defense units.
    Besides this, inflicted damage to patriot batteries does not mean the entire network has been struck. It was likely for 1 launcher to be hit by russian kinzals. However, not all launchers or other elements of the battery were damaged.

  • @gilbertroberttuahuru4715
    @gilbertroberttuahuru4715 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thanking the USA, Germany for the great support to Ukraine and her soldiers, president Zelensky. God Speed to Ukraine and the world 🌎 friendlies.

    • @MartinBrennan-b8b
      @MartinBrennan-b8b 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes great support, germanys industries are collapsing rapidly, americas debt is reaching astronomical proportions, much of the finance usa sent to ukraine has been stolen this includes thousands of tons of arms, munitions and missiles, no doubt joe and hunter will be stocking their bank accounts with much of the proceeds

  • @JeanyvesJeudy
    @JeanyvesJeudy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    how many kinzhals...
    Lolll😂😂
    Its a joke 😅😅

  • @MrAzizme888
    @MrAzizme888 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    باتريوت فيه عيوب كثيرة اثبت فشله في بعض الأحيان

  • @pathomthavaradhara
    @pathomthavaradhara ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I think in a couple of years, the break through in laser defense systems will have counter
    the “ hypersonic missiles attacks “ systems. And maybe lasers as a weapon as well.

    • @KGAnims
      @KGAnims ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No idea how will they ever overcome physics of laser vs atnosphere power loss. Not to mention trying to operate it in non-clear weather conditions.

    • @mirekslechta7161
      @mirekslechta7161 ปีที่แล้ว

      In couple of year, USA will be bancropted af all thoese wars.

    • @justinb7940
      @justinb7940 ปีที่แล้ว

      laser weapons have their places on high value targets like naval ships. but for general use they can be pretty limited

    • @mirekslechta7161
      @mirekslechta7161 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justinb7940 Those lasers can hardly destroy an ordinary missile under ideal almost laboratory conditions..... Those lasers never proved to be able to defeat strategic nuclear missilles which are going to be used also against aircraft carriers if necessary by Russia and China.

    • @justinb7940
      @justinb7940 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mirekslechta7161 right. i was just talking about theory.

  • @KalbroneognobpOgnobp
    @KalbroneognobpOgnobp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Even the not upgraded US patriot missiles can defense or intercept the most advanced fancy hypersonic missiles in Russia,how much more the most advanced and most upgrades US patriot missiles that accurately defense and intercept all the most advanced fancy hypersonic missiles in Russia.👍it is truly works...

  • @sekaloremmie6157
    @sekaloremmie6157 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If the intercept was possible, why did they have to rush another patriot system from Poland after the attack and later also admitting damage to the patriot

    • @leodoroandrade3351
      @leodoroandrade3351 ปีที่แล้ว

      Segunda informação foram vários kinzals lançados contra o Patriot e abatendo um após outros, com certeza o último chegou mais perto e sendo abatido houve estilhaços e nisso foi danificado. Mas para um sistema qua já tem 40 anos, foi um grande sucesso, visto que os EUA têm o mais avançado sistema que é o Taad que não quiseram enviar para a Ucrânia.

    • @JohnDorian-j7x
      @JohnDorian-j7x ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Simple, because it wasn't

    • @gintasvilkelis2544
      @gintasvilkelis2544 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Another Patriot was rushed because Ukraine needs many more Patriots than it's got. Each Patriot can protect only a relatively small area (40 km radius).

    • @TheSylfaein
      @TheSylfaein ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because Russia does what it is best at: Swarming their opponent with crap.
      Haven't you seen the insane amount of ground and aerial units they use?

    • @ChristianErnestHizon
      @ChristianErnestHizon ปีที่แล้ว

      Have you ever heard of a swarm attack? A Patriot system can only handle so much since loading those missiles takes time

  • @BekaluYedane-zc6zk
    @BekaluYedane-zc6zk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What we knew is that Ukraine is in darkness. More than half a million soldiers killed most the Nato weapons destroyed and some taken to Moscow for visitors display

  • @herberthonegger
    @herberthonegger ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice sales pitch for patriots. Unfortunately the data in the product brochure does not match the actual performance and no amount of propaganda will change this.

    • @JohnDorian-j7x
      @JohnDorian-j7x ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice sales pitch for the S-300 and S-400 systems too, which keep getting destroyed by cheap Chinese drones lololol, just like the patriot. they must be twins

    • @coreyleander7911
      @coreyleander7911 ปีที่แล้ว

      True. The actual performance is even better than this video portrays.

    • @herberthonegger
      @herberthonegger ปีที่แล้ว

      @@coreyleander7911 You could happy if the Patriot system was half as good as this little propaganda video portays. This is the stuff they hand down to cluless propaganda clowns for distribution. In military and analyst circles the Patriot performance assessment against these hypersonic missiles is all but positive. Wishful thinking is no substitute for the actual reality.

    • @luke250829
      @luke250829 ปีที่แล้ว

      The S-200 and S-400 have been proven to be yet another Russian Potemkin weapon@@JohnDorian-j7x

    • @justinb7940
      @justinb7940 ปีที่แล้ว

      care to provide any specifics?

  • @billwhoever2830
    @billwhoever2830 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The video makes it clear that the patriot might be able to tell decoys apart from warheads but this may depend on the tech behind the decoy.
    The iskander launches 6 decoys and it's safe to assume the very similar kinzal does the same. When you hear that 7 or so out of the 14 missiles got shot down it could well be 7 of the 12 decoys got shot down while the 2 missiles reached the target.

    • @Hydrazine1000
      @Hydrazine1000 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nowhere does it say that Iskander also carries decoys... It is not known to be a multiple-warhead missile.
      Makes no sense either, since Iskander only reaches up to 5 km height, meaning it doesn't leave the atmosphere. Ballistic missile decoys only work on much larger MIRV ICBMs that do leave earth's atmosphere, because decoys only work when there is no drag. Air drag separates the decoys from the actual missile immediately.

    • @virginccyy7645
      @virginccyy7645 ปีที่แล้ว

      No it doesn't, this is not an ICBM, the load of short range ballistic missiles is limited to the blast warhead, it doesn't have the capacity to carry dummies and the tech to be able to release them. 1. Because it doesn't go high enough. 2. It can't carry 6 dummies.
      This is why Russia is so full of misleading information because people like you brag about false information. You probably believe that the Patriot was destroyed and wanted to believe that Russia only launched 2 Kinzals while it launched 6 Kinzals, 9 Kalibers, 3 S400, and 5 UAVs in a simultaneous wave. The Patriot shot down 18 missiles!

    • @flixri726
      @flixri726 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Hydrazine1000 Iskander can carry up to 6 9B999-Decoys in its missile body. Also, in the ballistically launched version, the missile has a apogee of around 50km. Besides, it does not matter if the decoy slows faster than the warhead because you won't have time to compare the rates of slowing, deciding and engaging in a comfortable range of that what you are defending at the moment. I mean, your talking numbers here that are even more stoked than that what the Russians tell us themselves lol

    • @Hydrazine1000
      @Hydrazine1000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@flixri726 Ok, fair's fair, I stand corrected. I got to an item on The Drive that confirmed this.
      Now what's left is to figure out if those decoys from Iskander (which I just learned are in its base) carry over to Kinzhal. The latter does a much more tapered base, so there is no space at the location where Iskander holds them.

  • @aleksandarstix3097
    @aleksandarstix3097 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Patriot 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @teudaan
    @teudaan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Future weapon systems will ultilizsd A I technologies in ways we can’t possibly imagine now, beyond camouflage, stealth, disruption, misdirections…Why waste millions on one MACH 10 hyper sonic missile that may or may not get intercepted when you can send one hundred drones with the same cost?

  • @Sun-Tzu-
    @Sun-Tzu- 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is literally absolutely no way any missile interceptor system can determine the payload of any missile.

  • @leodoroandrade3351
    @leodoroandrade3351 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mas esse ainda é o sistema antigo da Otan; O EUA têm o sistema Taad que com certeza é bem mais eficaz que o Patriot. Se fosse enviado para a Ucrânia, monitoraria até a Russia.

    • @thornmtsetfwa1155
      @thornmtsetfwa1155 ปีที่แล้ว

      No the THAAD has a different role

    • @pedromatos5918
      @pedromatos5918 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Os interceptadores usados no sistema Thaad são maiores e tem um alcance maior em relacao ao sistema Patriot ... a forma de interceptar tambem é diferente !! Ainda existe o sistema Aegis que é o mais completo dos dois...este sistema tem um maior alcance de detecçao e pode destruir icbms ! Slava Ukraine 🇵🇹🇪🇺💙💛🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦💪🏼

    • @aleksandarstix3097
      @aleksandarstix3097 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @atanasgulev8985
    @atanasgulev8985 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    we saw on video how 3 batteries was shot all of their rockets and few second later we saw 2 russian rockets hits targets on the ground near the patriot system, really great system 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @stolly27
      @stolly27 ปีที่แล้ว

      trash Russian weapons getting shit on in Ukraine.

    • @coreyleander7911
      @coreyleander7911 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If it isn’t a great system, why haven’t they been destroyed? The video you’re referring to doesn’t show them striking the ground near the patriot system, it doesn’t actually indicate at all where the missiles hit or if they were intercepted

    • @TrevorSachko
      @TrevorSachko ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty sure you were dreaming when you saw that...

    • @denverchin44
      @denverchin44 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The patriot system was severely damage and so your brain is. Why still denying the truth? That missiles they claimed tobe Kinzhal missile is not even true. Only the western media spreads fake news about it to lessen the impact of downfall of US weaponries market.@@coreyleander7911

  • @brikeswardebbarma4029
    @brikeswardebbarma4029 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lawra engineering

  • @MdNasirHadiInternational
    @MdNasirHadiInternational ปีที่แล้ว +2

    U s a petiot Power Full,

  • @AncientRylanor69
    @AncientRylanor69 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    F

  • @ambconstrucao3770
    @ambconstrucao3770 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂😂😂😂

  • @MTBScotland
    @MTBScotland ปีที่แล้ว

    Kinzhal isn't that fancy. Its an air launched ballistic missile. It flies in a predictable path. The only thing going for it is it's speed and even then it's not going that fast near impact. Computing power is how you defeat it which the patriot system has.

  • @rentoshine2038
    @rentoshine2038 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The S400 and S500 are way better

    • @cybercat1531
      @cybercat1531 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That junk can't even shoot down a PD-2 UAS.

    • @cybercat1531
      @cybercat1531 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      And Kinzhals "Mach 10' advertising turned out to be bullshit. Radar tracking measured them barely going Mach 3.6.

    • @cybercat1531
      @cybercat1531 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      "HypeSonic"

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nope. Definitely not better if not much more worse. Russian SAMs including S-300/S-400 that are touted the "best" failed to intercept HIMARS rockets and NATO drones. More than 30 drone strikes reached Russian territory this year. Even 2 of Russia’s strategic bombers and one A-50 AWACS were damaged by drone attacks. A drone even reached Kremlin if that was not staged by Russia itself.
      [1] th-cam.com/video/eX4KNEjhaOw/w-d-xo.html
      [2] th-cam.com/video/6KjC6neVlbE/w-d-xo.html
      [3] th-cam.com/video/1koEPJYTYA8/w-d-xo.html
      [4] th-cam.com/video/JPvZyZxLsKM/w-d-xo.html
      [5] th-cam.com/video/U6mq_CI-Z70/w-d-xo.html
      [6] th-cam.com/video/3qRSICllwJ4/w-d-xo.html
      [7] th-cam.com/video/fzQ9mo5HRUg/w-d-xo.html

    • @waheex
      @waheex ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LOL s400 nice video on telegram of just the latest one exploding. They can't even defend themselves nevermind airspace

  • @mirekslechta7161
    @mirekslechta7161 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mildly admitted, Russia is far ahead. In reality, Patrion shot down non of those Kinzhals and the only meating was when Kinzhal exploded while hitting Patriot system on the ground....

    • @daseinzigwahrem
      @daseinzigwahrem ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Where did you get that information from? And why are there no photos of destroyed Patriot launchers? Usually Russia makes them public very quickly.

    • @JohnDorian-j7x
      @JohnDorian-j7x ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If that was true, then why have 90% of missile/drone attacks on Kyiv disappeared since the arrival of the Patriot air defense system? If the Patriots were destroyed, it would have been front page news all across Russian news outlets and social media

    • @luke250829
      @luke250829 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just more Russian lies/propaganda @@daseinzigwahrem

    • @justinb7940
      @justinb7940 ปีที่แล้ว

      if there was a destroyed patriot there would be pictures all over the place. get back on your meds

    • @solomonshv
      @solomonshv ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ok ivan. 200 rubles for you. get yourself some black bread and kefir for your hard work

  • @jmsengnaw2543
    @jmsengnaw2543 ปีที่แล้ว

    နောက်ဆုံးတစ်ခု

  • @konradkarlovich5801
    @konradkarlovich5801 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    why did the downed 'Kinzhal' look like a BETAB-500 air bomb???😅

    • @mirekslechta7161
      @mirekslechta7161 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mildly admitted, Russia is far ahead. In reality, Patrion shot down non of those Kinzhals and the only meating was when Kinzhal exploded while hitting Patriot system on the ground....

    • @SectorSos
      @SectorSos ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Do you know how inside of Kinzhal warhead looks like? ..... well now you do. Of course it lost all of its aluminum and plastic, outer shell components.
      PS: I'm not pretending, to be specialist on missiles. After all I'm just an average, retired, infantry, US Army combat veteran, with 20+ years and multiple combat developments. Thing is, when 'shit hits the fan' a lot of stuff, losses its original looks, familiar to the eye. One example. I've seen an unexploded HE, T-72 round, that got stuck in the wall, and guess what? It looked nothing, what I knew how the round looks. Another example. Have you ever saw, unexploded 120, 82 or even 60mm mortar rounds? Yes. Basically no resemblance to their original looks. Basically what I am trying to say is. Don't believe propaganda, don't matter which side you're rooting for. Look at the picture, from different perspectives.😉

    • @mirekslechta7161
      @mirekslechta7161 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SectorSos Patriot was never good, let alone now(afterRussia started to use new technology(hypersonic)

    • @mirekslechta7161
      @mirekslechta7161 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leecrumble3921 I do not agree with your opinion. Russia could have leveled Kiev long time ago with conventional bombs(not Russia´s objective) , on the other hand there has been plenty of precission strikes in Kiev already... Russia is not targeting Ursula or Biden or Blinken during their visits....because SMO was ment as a limited war, not to spark WWIII by killing Biden for instance. Kinzhal can destroy any target in Europe or USA(if launched within it´s range...Ukraine is not any exception.

    • @Galomortalbr
      @Galomortalbr ปีที่แล้ว

      likely a decoy