This design does not compress the battery cells as required by 300 kg according to the datasheet. Because the back wall has a window 00:16, into which the middle of the batteries will be squeezed out. It was worth placing a partition between the 2 rows of batteries for better heat dissipation. On the top pressure plate, the stiffening ribs had to be extended to the edges to ensure that the plate was stiff enough to allow compression of the batteries. I'm ready to help you with design, it looks like you don't have good engineers :)
cut off is on the back, not on the front as you would expect. poor design decisions and complications once you want to mount that on a wall or put it on a stand without wheels. Then you are forced to turn the backside to the front cause there is the turn on/off button and the reset switch. But in that case where you make the back your new front you will loose the display cause that will be located then on the back. The panel / display with its controls needs to be installed on the flat top surface in the upper part or on the upper back to bring all controls anf connectors on one side as seen before in the rack design.
You need to improve the design: it suffers in case you want to use this as a powerwall mounted on a stand or on a wall mount. Why ? Because you then would need to turn the battery upside down or make the back to the front cause in this case you need access to the backside with all the essential connections and of cause TURN ON and OFF and also what ? Reset button. Once mounted to the wall you will be screwed if the front would stay the front cause you would then need access to the back you will not have. So, redesign the case and offer a solution to reuse the display on the back or even maybe on the top, why don't you put it on the top with an option from which side it could be looked at with a readable display and not upside down of cause. We have ordered the L but were not aware of all the issues and implications that you will need a lot more space cause you need to be able to turn it around once it shows faults or errors and what not. It might also be a solution to use a shortened panel with the display to mount that on the front and if needed on the back and the shortened back panel on the front. Needs more flexibility and you can not hide behind the argument that it was designed as a battery on wheels. Good design is a different story and hard to achieve - at least if you look at apple designs or the microsoft surface series. And it was an obvious troublemaker cause the Mason rack shape battery has all connectors and displays mounted on just 1 surface, not 2 as seen here with important switches and functions hidden in the back like turn battery on and off.
3 weeks in and no reply . pretty disappointing from a customer point of view who had paid a lot for that battery case. I still miss an opportunity how to turn the back to the front and add a display and useable UI on the top or back that will be used as front.
@@SeplosTechnology But your opposite back wall has a pit in the middle of the battery cells, which ensures that the batteries bulge into that recess. See 00:16. You should have made a rigid support plane there, the same as the front wall. What were you thinking while designing? According to the EVE datasheets, you had to provide a cell compression pressure of 300 kg. That's why I won't buy this product of yours.
Very nice 😮
I like to keep and store the cells UPRIGHT and not flat... there is some kind of fluid inside, and mind the gas release valve. Any opinions on this?
You can have a stackable one
@@SeplosTechnology can you say me the name of the application for connection Bluetooth with my Phone Android please
nice products
Nice product
Thanks for your feedback.
This design does not compress the battery cells as required by 300 kg according to the datasheet. Because the back wall has a window 00:16, into which the middle of the batteries will be squeezed out.
It was worth placing a partition between the 2 rows of batteries for better heat dissipation. On the top pressure plate, the stiffening ribs had to be extended to the edges to ensure that the plate was stiff enough to allow compression of the batteries. I'm ready to help you with design, it looks like you don't have good engineers :)
Where is the cut off switch, and can you link two or more together?
Yes, max. 16 in parallel.
cut off is on the back, not on the front as you would expect.
poor design decisions and complications once you want to mount that on a wall or put it on a stand without wheels. Then you are forced to turn the backside to the front cause there is the turn on/off button and the reset switch. But in that case where you make the back your new front you will loose the display cause that will be located then on the back.
The panel / display with its controls needs to be installed on the flat top surface in the upper part or on the upper back to bring all controls anf connectors on one side as seen before in the rack design.
Is it available in Africa (kenya) & at what price...
I am trying to find a seplos reseller in Europe but can't find any. I am looking to buy and install it in Greece
Αν θες εχω λυση
You need to improve the design: it suffers in case you want to use this as a powerwall mounted on a stand or on a wall mount. Why ?
Because you then would need to turn the battery upside down or make the back to the front cause in this case you need access to the backside with all the essential connections and of cause TURN ON and OFF and also what ?
Reset button. Once mounted to the wall you will be screwed if the front would stay the front cause you would then need access to the back you will not have.
So, redesign the case and offer a solution to reuse the display on the back or even maybe on the top, why don't you put it on the top with an option from which side it could be looked at with a readable display and not upside down of cause.
We have ordered the L but were not aware of all the issues and implications that you will need a lot more space cause you need to be able to turn it around once it shows faults or errors and what not.
It might also be a solution to use a shortened panel with the display to mount that on the front and if needed on the back and the shortened back panel on the front.
Needs more flexibility and you can not hide behind the argument that it was designed as a battery on wheels.
Good design is a different story and hard to achieve - at least if you look at apple designs or the microsoft surface series.
And it was an obvious troublemaker cause the Mason rack shape battery has all connectors and displays mounted on just 1 surface, not 2 as seen here with important switches and functions hidden in the back like turn battery on and off.
3 weeks in and no reply . pretty disappointing from a customer point of view who had paid a lot for that battery case.
I still miss an opportunity how to turn the back to the front and add a display and useable UI on the top or back that will be used as front.
👍👍
Vedo che non pressate le celle...a me hanno consigliato di pressare le celle per avere più durata...a chi devo credere?grazie di un vostro riscontro.
sì, hai ragione, una certa compressione delle celle prolungherà i cicli di vita e il nostro pannello frontale offre una compressione alle celle.
@@SeplosTechnology But your opposite back wall has a pit in the middle of the battery cells, which ensures that the batteries bulge into that recess. See 00:16. You should have made a rigid support plane there, the same as the front wall. What were you thinking while designing? According to the EVE datasheets, you had to provide a cell compression pressure of 300 kg. That's why I won't buy this product of yours.