I know you said in your last q&a about how long reviews take, but please, please, do not stop making them. Yours are the best, and I watch a lot. No one shows the underside of a car, no one pushes on the blank where a seat heat button should be like its all of a sudden going to morph into one, and no one would comment on how soft foam is on the underside of an engine cover. You are unique and we love you for you individuality.
I won't stop, I love making them! If I can ever expand to having a few people full-time helping me I will take on lots of "boring" cars too, regardless of if anyone watches the video or not. lol
@@mikeh3851 I second that comment. I'm not in the market for any cars/trucks, but watching you review them is why I watch. It's fun and you do a different spin than everyone else. Keep them going.
@@SarahnTuned "too technical" from a visualization as action point of view. "We'll see you out on the water" or "we're going for a drive" is normally how these reviews are done to *get in the driver seat* so to speak. If you think the car is an art form obviously you want to present that as such as obviously that's what the folks putting their passion and their lives into these "motored machines" *THINK* they are doing(but they need you say that for them.) But absolutely once you have the camera this is your car so fluer-de-lis as the French would have you have it.
Well, well, well. Sarah, you had to ask that important question after I was starting on a rant regarding truth in performance. While the 6-pot motor sales sets the Standard in the Toyota 6 pot, for peformancingē
A lot of your review data reminded me of one of the cars I had to sell when I emigrated from England - a lightly tuned Porsche 944TurboS. That had 250 BHP as designed from a 4 cylinder turbo 2.5 litre, also 50/50 weight balance and rather modest wheels for its class. Rebuilt with forged pistons and a better fuel pump and ECU tweaks, it made 312 BHP on the dyno and was far and away the most lively and fun car I have ever owned, especially as it lacked an LSD! So I think this Supra could end up much loved in years to come. Great review as ever - your format and presenting as well as the filming and editing, not to mention your sense of humour, make these a great to watch!
No, would not make any sense calling it a Celica. The 86 would be the natural successor to the Celica if Toyota wanted to resurrect the Celica. The 2.0 Supra is way to close in so many ways to the 3.0 Supra.
I recently came to America and saw this car on the road; couldn't stop staring, a Red Supra. It's an order of magnitude prettier than what it looks in the picture or videos. This Beauty makes me so happy. You usually don't see such cars on Indian roads.
I’m old enough to remember the original Supra... it was essentially Toyota’s “Mach I” of the Celica. Very much in your court... some different, less expensive but fun versions would be awesome and could get the younger generations hooked on Toyota’s for life. Great review.
You do have a big point. If they were to revive that name, it would be amazing. Also, styling point; Yes definitely change it up just a tad bit nothing too crazy just to set them apart
I love that you show the underside of all the cars in your reviews. And yeah, no fluid is lifetime. I just changed all fluids in my truck at 60,000 miles today, coincidentally.
Actually they are lifetime, for a very specific definition of the word "lifetime". (The other word for it is "short".) I suppose that in the more frigid regions of the USA, Canada, Alaska and the like, road salt may well kill it with corrosion before the fluid needs changing. That could be classified as lifetime couldn't it?
don't ever stop doing these reviews i love them there just nobody like you doing them, also i would like to this car but with a v8 in it but not the BMW engine
I love the content you produce. Builds , Reviews, Road trips, All of it rocks . Keep making that sweet sweet content. Also your outfits , your style, your look , are scrumptious. Always looking for more Sarah notifications ...
Yes, I agree. Bring back the notchback. I have a 1972 Celica coupe that I bought new when a junior in high school. Why yes, still have and love it! Too sentimental to part with. Btw, it was $2847.00. :o). Why yes, I heard that last minute f-bomb. :o). Keep up the great work!
Your videos were always fun and different and I always enjoyed the humor, but adding the garage space and now doing the lift shots and more mechanical stuff has really elevated the channel. I think the subs speak for themselves. It's a nice feeling being part of something that gets better and bigger (...), there are some channels that take a high dive in a low well and this isn't one. Keep going.
Ye gods Sarah! Good work fabulous you, your obvious hard work in editing and getting this car view out is outstanding and it's a great car view as they alway are.
Another awesome review, thanks Sarah, thank you very much :) The thing with power folding mirrors is that they fold in and face up, so rain, snow, freezing rain all fall onto the mirror, they should fold in and face down so they are protected from the natural weather elements. I rate this cinco de mayo burritos.
Everyone made a fuss about the 440 and 426 Cudas back in the day, but the best handling one was the AAR Cuda with the 340 six pack. Lighter = better cornering, all day long, and it was far from slow.
A Celica is something i haven't thought about in 40 years! I will look it up again, but imo they should be left behind. Lol too much? I love your videos, you make them all interesting with your personality. You make me smile and chuckle. Thank you!
I owned a well used Celica GT back in the day. A great car for just tossing around in the curves and fun for everyday driving. So, a new Celica that was based on the current Supra would get my vote.
I just knew your equipment case was going to fly into the windshield during the ever-loving braking test! Oh and btw, you missed a censor beep at the end. An f-bomb got by!😂
I do enjoy your dry humor. It’s just awesome :)) Plus, big plus with the creativity regarding showing off the rims. I have t see that anywhere else on TH-cam :)!
As the owner of a 96 Celica ST, it's honestly been my favorite car I've owned, and I think Toyota missed a big opportunity with this Supra to bring back the Celica name plate. However, if they had, the only things I would have asked for (if possible) would be to cut the weight down to at least sub-3k pounds (imo, 3100 is still a bit too heavy for a Celica), slash that price, and modify the chassis so you don't have all that dead space between the engine and the front of the car. That said, for a new "Celica" I'd also be fine with a 2dr liftback Corolla that had a more sporty suspension setup. Loved the video! Keep up the great work!
I had a 1976 Celica, brand new with 5 speed manual. It was a fun to drive 4 cylinder. The Supra was definitely a next level car as it was much more than a larger engine. This car doesn't seem to be totally different between 4 and 6 cylinder. I like this car and would buy the 6 cylinder version like Sarah said, get the full optioned package.
I like your idea of styling the 4-cylinder version a little different and calling it a Celica. Then they could go completely off the deep end and offer it with a 6-speed manual (or the ZF 8-speed auto) and drop the price to closer to 40K 😁 And to answer your question, I've never used the presets on any radio, even when they were mechanical buttons.
Seems like an okay idea on paper, but both the Supra and Z4 are built in the same factory in Austria. If they were to deviate too much from the current design, I’m sure that would mess with production. It’s already a low volume car compared to what Toyota/BMW typically sells. Imo, the current “Celica” is the GT86. There are some “bolt-in” manuals for the B48 (and B58 iirc), just a matter of that getting greenlit.
Another great review. It is a bit watered down and for that money there are other options to look at. That’s for the honest review and not sugar coating it.
My best friend in high school had a 78 Celica. We had a lot of great times in that car. I hear what you're saying about the 6 cylinder but there is something special about that 4. At least for me.
Hey I just picked up my Supra and was messing around and found out that you can use the presets, for instances like #1 can take straight to tire pressures or anything in the menu with going through the whole screens. To answer your question at 3:42. So I guess you can say I will be using them. Lol hopefully it don’t put me in the weird category. Love your reviews By The Way!!
I'm with you, Sarah. I've never been a fan of all the extra bells & whistles in cars now. That's why I've always had base models with manual trannys. You're awesome; keep on doing your great work 👌👍.
Another great car review, Sarah. I like your idea of making the four cylinder model of this car slightly different than the six. Always love the underside views of the cars you review. On the subject of smushed exhaust, I had that on my Ford Focus RS. For some reason, they smushed the exhaust, right in the middle. I cured that problem by putting on the Ford Performance (Borla) exhaust. No more smush! As always, keep up the car reviews. I really enjoy your style.
Holy Spicy Mustard! Some folks don’t want or need the 6, but want all the other options like leather, stereo & power cooled seats. This is typical, pay top dollar & get everything or pay a little less & get a lot less.
The first car I bought (with my own money) was a 1998 Pontiac Grand Am GT. It came in a four cylinder and six cylinder variety, but the 3.1L V6 was well known to be a lemon. Drove that car near a decade, largely without incident. Might still be driving it if that deer hadn't had its way. But in that light, I can absolutely believe a four-cylinder variant of a sporty car is a viable performance daily. Thanks for this review!
Another great review from a TH-camr that brings excellent and unique content and simply does not read us the spec sheet and is essentially a sales person for the dealership they borrowed it from. By the way, if Toyota wanted to bring back the Celica, they would have called the 86 the Celica. The 2.0 Supra is way to close to the 3.0 Supra in so many ways that it makes no sense to call it a Celica.
The scene that start with: "No one behind me" Enjoys me most, every time. There's no one in front of you Sarah, that's the reality Thank you: about you Cheers, Kay (Not my natural language, sorry about this)
With the front end being 200 lbs lighter, it's gotta be a lot more fun to hustle along a twisty mountain road. And that's why I'd take this every time, over the 3.0 liter. #UnpopularOpinion
With you on the insanity of "lifetime fill." They actually eliminated the drainplug for the diff on my e90 3-series! Glad to see the Supra appears to have one.
You can fix that by literally drilling your own drain plug into it and tapping some threads with a threading tool. Get a little m14 1.25 bolt to put in and just replace whatever fluid comes out with new fluid.
Before Lexus was given birth, I had a chance to drive my uncle's Celica around. What a fun car! It was a blast to drive, night time Chicago 4 and 5 lanes were like a video game. The reason I got to drive the Celica was because because my uncle had purchased a Supra. Man! That was a luxury step up that I was not given the opportunity to drive. Yes, it makes sense for a return of the Celica. The newest Mr. Toyoda in charge has said he wants Toyota to also be seen as fun and fresh, along with being safe and reliable, so I see the Celica as a possibility. But what about sales, Bob? If everyone continues to purchase trucks and SUVs, will dealers want to spend any of their Floor Plan on show-floor trophies?
Thanks for the great review and the metric fuel consumption! A nice upgrade to this car would be them fixing the wind buffeting. It's a ridiculous defect on a car that begs to be driven with the windows down!
I'm all for the Celina gt model. That car with just a bit different front end and just a little coupish style would work well. I enjoy your channel Sarah. You do a great job. You can make me laugh, when I need it most! Love and prayers to you. Come drive my '21 Honda Accord Sport 2.0t!
Those older models. I had an '83 Celica GT Coup. It had the retractable headlights instead of the peekaboos. And don't forget the Clarion cassette deck with the analogue tuner.
The buttons marked 1 - 8 are shortcuts for the i-drive system not just radio presets, you can use them for presetting the radio but you would only need one button for that. Read the owners manual or just start playing with them. They are super useful once you get to figure out what you need them for.
I originally owned an SX 1990 Celica and currently have a 2001 ZR Celica (Australia). I would love it if Toyota resurrected the Celica nameplate, on the correct type of car of course. Great concept idea.
For some people that can't afford the extra 8k usd (12k in Canada for me) this entry level supra is a gift from Toyota. Still has the great style, at the cost of lower power. But it still puts a smile on your face! It really opens up a whole new market, yes i will regret the Supra 3.0 , but i will enjoy the 2.0 very much so! getting the 2022 as soon as they can build n ship it!
I test drove the 2.0 Supra a couple of times recently. I actually really loved the look though the fake vents are inexcusable for this price range. Also, no performance brakes is a joke for any sports car over $40,000 brand new. The brakes felt mushy with some poor bite. I love the interior and the seats. Power was fine. The base model (without the safety and tech package) has some awful standard speakers. You gotta get the Tech package with the JBL audio. I was almost going to purchase one though I decided to go a different route. The 3.0 Supra with the safety and tech package would be the way I would go as you get a lot for a little more. Great car. I can see this car be an insurance monster in a few years like the FRS was in the mid to late 2010's as it will attract the tuner market.
I really like your reviews and the Celica/Supra is a great idea. I remember way back when, there was a noticeable difference between the models. This review made me hungry with all the food references....spicy mustard, cooking and the "watermelon" manicure.
If the number buttons are anything like the ones in a BMW, and I'm guessing they are, you can assign shortcuts to menu screens to them. That's pretty useful.
I agree with your comment about the "lifetime" transmission fluid. That's a manufacturers thing, the ZF website, the company that builds them recommends changing the fluid every 80-120k km. Which I think converts to every 50-75k miles.
The reason that manufacturers make the base models look like "watered down" versions of the top model is to get us to buy $8000 worth of stuff we don't need and will never use. It's also why options now come in packages. If you want full instrumentation you have to buy the package with dual lighted vanity mirrors, six way power rear seats and twenty four sub woofers. Thanks for some great and insightful reviews.
Sarah, for the wind buffeting, when u rolled the drivers window down, if u roll the passenger side down about an inch to inch and a half, buffeting goes away like “magic”
In america, where the 6 cyclinder isn’t much more money than the 4 cylinder, it doesn’t make sense to buy this. In europe and asia, the 6 cylinder costs waaaay more than the 4
I totally agree on bringing a Celica, creating more value for the Supra 2.0. We could see both cars getting popular, just like the Stinger is at the moment. I think the Supra 2.0 is freaking cool, an odd ball that will pickup value. Cause they won't sell that many.
I had a Volvo C70 with "lifetime" transmission fluid. The problem is their definition of "lifetime". I changed the fluid (using the cooler source and return lines) and the performance improved immensely. And yes, if there's going to be a 4 cylinder version it should be called a Celica.
No, would not make any sense calling it a Celica. The 86 would be the natural successor to the Celica. The 2.0 Supra is way to close in so many ways to the 3.0 Supra.
@@realitycheck469 I'm thinking more along the lines of when the Celica and the Supra were a shared platform back in the early to mid 80s. For that reason I would also say the 86 is more of a successor to the RWD Corolla GTS of the same era than the Celica. Doesn't matter really, I doubt Toyota will ever bring back the Celica nameplate.
I know you said in your last q&a about how long reviews take, but please, please, do not stop making them. Yours are the best, and I watch a lot. No one shows the underside of a car, no one pushes on the blank where a seat heat button should be like its all of a sudden going to morph into one, and no one would comment on how soft foam is on the underside of an engine cover. You are unique and we love you for you individuality.
I won't stop, I love making them! If I can ever expand to having a few people full-time helping me I will take on lots of "boring" cars too, regardless of if anyone watches the video or not. lol
@@SarahnTuned I can't speak for everyone, but I watch because of you. The cars and trucks are just a bonus.
@@mikeh3851 I second that comment. I'm not in the market for any cars/trucks, but watching you review them is why I watch. It's fun and you do a different spin than everyone else. Keep them going.
@@SarahnTuned I’d love to help if I lived closer
@@SarahnTuned "too technical" from a visualization as action point of view. "We'll see you out on the water" or "we're going for a drive" is normally how these reviews are done to *get in the driver seat* so to speak. If you think the car is an art form obviously you want to present that as such as obviously that's what the folks putting their passion and their lives into these "motored machines" *THINK* they are doing(but they need you say that for them.)
But absolutely once you have the camera this is your car so fluer-de-lis as the French would have you have it.
Sarah you are the spicy mustard in our day. Your flow of consciousness verbalizations are awesome.
Well, well, well. Sarah, you had to ask that important question after I was starting on a rant regarding truth in performance. While the 6-pot motor sales sets the Standard in the Toyota 6 pot, for peformancingē
My eyes just about popped out when I saw the fuel economy also listed in litres per 100km! Thank you!
Totally agree that the 18" wheels look and fit the car much better than the 19's.
A lot of your review data reminded me of one of the cars I had to sell when I emigrated from England - a lightly tuned Porsche 944TurboS. That had 250 BHP as designed from a 4 cylinder turbo 2.5 litre, also 50/50 weight balance and rather modest wheels for its class. Rebuilt with forged pistons and a better fuel pump and ECU tweaks, it made 312 BHP on the dyno and was far and away the most lively and fun car I have ever owned, especially as it lacked an LSD! So I think this Supra could end up much loved in years to come. Great review as ever - your format and presenting as well as the filming and editing, not to mention your sense of humour, make these a great to watch!
Wow telling us how you really feel, I like it! Honest, Pure, No Bullshit! Celica was a cool car too! 🤙🤘😎🏁
No, would not make any sense calling it a Celica. The 86 would be the natural successor to the Celica if Toyota wanted to resurrect the Celica. The 2.0 Supra is way to close in so many ways to the 3.0 Supra.
I recently came to America and saw this car on the road; couldn't stop staring, a Red Supra. It's an order of magnitude prettier than what it looks in the picture or videos. This Beauty makes me so happy. You usually don't see such cars on Indian roads.
I'm really enjoying your channel here on YT. Brilliant reviews and look forward to your vlog style car repairs. Thanks
I’m old enough to remember the original Supra... it was essentially Toyota’s “Mach I” of the Celica. Very much in your court... some different, less expensive but fun versions would be awesome and could get the younger generations hooked on Toyota’s for life. Great review.
You do have a big point. If they were to revive that name, it would be amazing. Also, styling point; Yes definitely change it up just a tad bit nothing too crazy just to set them apart
Would be even wilder if they called it a "240 Pulsar"
I love that you show the underside of all the cars in your reviews. And yeah, no fluid is lifetime. I just changed all fluids in my truck at 60,000 miles today, coincidentally.
Actually they are lifetime, for a very specific definition of the word "lifetime". (The other word for it is "short".)
I suppose that in the more frigid regions of the USA, Canada, Alaska and the like, road salt may well kill it with corrosion before the fluid needs changing. That could be classified as lifetime couldn't it?
This is the most honest review I have ever seen. Bravo!
don't ever stop doing these reviews i love them there just nobody like you doing them, also i would like to this car but with a v8 in it but not the BMW engine
The way you explain things cracks me up.
I love the content you produce. Builds , Reviews, Road trips, All of it rocks . Keep making that sweet sweet content. Also your outfits , your style, your look , are scrumptious. Always looking for more Sarah notifications ...
Yes, I agree. Bring back the notchback. I have a 1972 Celica coupe that I bought new when a junior in high school. Why yes, still have and love it! Too sentimental to part with. Btw, it was $2847.00. :o). Why yes, I heard that last minute f-bomb. :o). Keep up the great work!
Talking of Toyota's, Sarah would've loved the Yaris GR rally homologation special we've got in the UK
I would buy one today if it was possible here.
That had a supra and a Yaris GR side by side at our local Farm show in New Zealandl. I love they look of that Yaris GR.
Would be cool if Porsche would let you get some dirt on the Taycan Cross Turismo
Being french-canadian I laugh my ass off when you read the French notice for the airbags ! Great review as always @Sarah -n- Tuned !
Me too! It's just friggin' hilarious to hear Sarah read out the french text like she does. In every single car reviews to boot!
Your videos were always fun and different and I always enjoyed the humor, but adding the garage space and now doing the lift shots and more mechanical stuff has really elevated the channel. I think the subs speak for themselves. It's a nice feeling being part of something that gets better and bigger (...), there are some channels that take a high dive in a low well and this isn't one. Keep going.
Ye gods Sarah! Good work fabulous you, your obvious hard work in editing and getting this car view out is outstanding and it's a great car view as they alway are.
Another awesome review, thanks Sarah, thank you very much :) The thing with power folding mirrors is that they fold in and face up, so rain, snow, freezing rain all fall onto the mirror, they should fold in and face down so they are protected from the natural weather elements. I rate this cinco de mayo burritos.
Thanks for reviewing the low rent version. 200 lbs off the front and $8k cheaper appeals to me. Of course I haven't driven either of them.
Everyone made a fuss about the 440 and 426 Cudas back in the day, but the best handling one was the AAR Cuda with the 340 six pack. Lighter = better cornering, all day long, and it was far from slow.
Here’s an idea for an exclusive base model incentive: Manual transmission
Then nobody would buy the 6 cylinder.
@@mach1john you must not know much about the b58, over 450 wheel hp with just a tune 😅
@@GerardoHernandezF87M2 my point being put a manual transmission in.
Probably could have sold a few more just by calling it a Celica
A Celica is something i haven't thought about in 40 years! I will look it up again, but imo they should be left behind. Lol too much?
I love your videos, you make them all interesting with your personality. You make me smile and chuckle. Thank you!
You talking about the hot warning message while tuned into "The Heat" on the radio @6:03 . Well played Sarah, well played.
I owned a well used Celica GT back in the day. A great car for just tossing around in the curves and fun for everyday driving. So, a new Celica that was based on the current Supra would get my vote.
Just recently found your channel. Loving your style and sense of humour.
Ben & Jerry's and Sarah-n-Tuned binge watch weekend! 🐧
I just knew your equipment case was going to fly into the windshield during the ever-loving braking test!
Oh and btw, you missed a censor beep at the end. An f-bomb got by!😂
Love you honest car reviews! I always look forward to them :)
The buffeting heard with the window down is known as “Helmholtz resonance.” You’re welcome.
Use the HEISENBERG CONPENSATOR TO NEGATE
Can I get that with a side order of Doppler Effect?
I do enjoy your dry humor. It’s just awesome :))
Plus, big plus with the creativity regarding showing off the rims. I have t see that anywhere else on TH-cam :)!
As the owner of a 96 Celica ST, it's honestly been my favorite car I've owned, and I think Toyota missed a big opportunity with this Supra to bring back the Celica name plate. However, if they had, the only things I would have asked for (if possible) would be to cut the weight down to at least sub-3k pounds (imo, 3100 is still a bit too heavy for a Celica), slash that price, and modify the chassis so you don't have all that dead space between the engine and the front of the car. That said, for a new "Celica" I'd also be fine with a 2dr liftback Corolla that had a more sporty suspension setup.
Loved the video! Keep up the great work!
Sarah, looking great as always and keeping all the car junkies on there toes
Your reviews are the best. No matter how crazy stressful my day is, your humor makes it all better.
homie THIRSTIN
I had a 1976 Celica, brand new with 5 speed manual. It was a fun to drive 4 cylinder. The Supra was definitely a next level car as it was much more than a larger engine. This car doesn't seem to be totally different between 4 and 6 cylinder. I like this car and would buy the 6 cylinder version like Sarah said, get the full optioned package.
Hearing you describe the empty space in the front of engine bay made me think of the Dodge Daytona & Plymouth RoadRunner
Ever see a first Gen Monte Carlo with a small block? The fan shroud looks like a sewer pipe!
@@NovaResource yeah, those clutch fans had huge shrouds & that was one of the worst
I like your idea of styling the 4-cylinder version a little different and calling it a Celica. Then they could go completely off the deep end and offer it with a 6-speed manual (or the ZF 8-speed auto) and drop the price to closer to 40K 😁 And to answer your question, I've never used the presets on any radio, even when they were mechanical buttons.
It actually starts at 40k but dealers mark them up sadly but it isn't impossible to find one under 40k.
Seems like an okay idea on paper, but both the Supra and Z4 are built in the same factory in Austria. If they were to deviate too much from the current design, I’m sure that would mess with production. It’s already a low volume car compared to what Toyota/BMW typically sells. Imo, the current “Celica” is the GT86.
There are some “bolt-in” manuals for the B48 (and B58 iirc), just a matter of that getting greenlit.
Another great review. It is a bit watered down and for that money there are other options to look at. That’s for the honest review and not sugar coating it.
Love all your car reviews
My best friend in high school had a 78 Celica. We had a lot of great times in that car. I hear what you're saying about the 6 cylinder but there is something special about that 4. At least for me.
Hey I just picked up my Supra and was messing around and found out that you can use the presets, for instances like #1 can take straight to tire pressures or anything in the menu with going through the whole screens. To answer your question at 3:42. So I guess you can say I will be using them. Lol hopefully it don’t put me in the weird category. Love your reviews By The Way!!
+1 on the Celica Supra. Thanks for what you do...you have gotten REALLY good at it over all this time.
I'm with you, Sarah. I've never been a fan of all the extra bells & whistles in cars now. That's why I've always had base models with manual trannys. You're awesome; keep on doing your great work 👌👍.
Another great car review, Sarah. I like your idea of making the four cylinder model of this car slightly different than the six. Always love the underside views of the cars you review. On the subject of smushed exhaust, I had that on my Ford Focus RS. For some reason, they smushed the exhaust, right in the middle. I cured that problem by putting on the Ford Performance (Borla) exhaust. No more smush! As always, keep up the car reviews. I really enjoy your style.
Happy Humpday Sarah!!
Stay excellent!!😎
The most trusted car reviews from a car driver/ lover
Toyota should use this video to sell this car. Excellent!
or they could just give me one and ill keep it for the rest of my life, lol
Honestly I’m just waiting for the manual version. Base plus 6 speed = fun commuter I’m all for it.
Holy Spicy Mustard! Some folks don’t want or need the 6, but want all the other options like leather, stereo & power cooled seats. This is typical, pay top dollar & get everything or pay a little less & get a lot less.
The first car I bought (with my own money) was a 1998 Pontiac Grand Am GT. It came in a four cylinder and six cylinder variety, but the 3.1L V6 was well known to be a lemon. Drove that car near a decade, largely without incident. Might still be driving it if that deer hadn't had its way. But in that light, I can absolutely believe a four-cylinder variant of a sporty car is a viable performance daily. Thanks for this review!
I think you’re 💯 correct on bringing back the celica with those specs.
Another great review from a TH-camr that brings excellent and unique content and simply does not read us the spec sheet and is essentially a sales person for the dealership they borrowed it from.
By the way, if Toyota wanted to bring back the Celica, they would have called the 86 the Celica. The 2.0 Supra is way to close to the 3.0 Supra in so many ways that it makes no sense to call it a Celica.
The scene that start with:
"No one behind me"
Enjoys me most, every time.
There's no one in front of you Sarah, that's the reality
Thank you: about you
Cheers, Kay
(Not my natural language, sorry about this)
Sarah has no clue how Incredibly Brilliant she is! Another honest review that's not available anywhere else! Top Job!
Programmable dash buttons: I use them! Have the same ones in my M235i.
I prefer the 2.0 turbocharged 4 cylinder, $8,000.00 that a lot of penguin food!! And it still put a big smile on your face! Thanks Sarah!
Great video Sarah, I agree it should called the Celica Supra. I had the Celica Supra you show but black 2.0 auto great car.
Great review, love the Celtic out fit.
Honest car reviews 😍 love you boo! 🌈
With the front end being 200 lbs lighter, it's gotta be a lot more fun to hustle along a twisty mountain road. And that's why I'd take this every time, over the 3.0 liter. #UnpopularOpinion
Agree, for car fans it's nice to have some kind of visual cue to differentiate one trim level from another.
With you on the insanity of "lifetime fill." They actually eliminated the drainplug for the diff on my e90 3-series! Glad to see the Supra appears to have one.
You can fix that by literally drilling your own drain plug into it and tapping some threads with a threading tool. Get a little m14 1.25 bolt to put in and just replace whatever fluid comes out with new fluid.
Before Lexus was given birth, I had a chance to drive my uncle's Celica around. What a fun car! It was a blast to drive, night time Chicago 4 and 5 lanes were like a video game. The reason I got to drive the Celica was because because my uncle had purchased a Supra. Man! That was a luxury step up that I was not given the opportunity to drive.
Yes, it makes sense for a return of the Celica.
The newest Mr. Toyoda in charge has said he wants Toyota to also be seen as fun and fresh, along with being safe and reliable, so I see the Celica as a possibility. But what about sales, Bob? If everyone continues to purchase trucks and SUVs, will dealers want to spend any of their Floor Plan on show-floor trophies?
Bring back all the fun cars! Totally agree on the Celica thing.
Hi Sarah - i program radio stations in the vehicle and memorize which is which, good for me. AND ! really like your accentuation in your videos. 😁
I'm starting a band tonight called Fly Pee, look for it on no ones streaming platform.
Sounds too mainstream, go metal and call it Dragon Fly Pee'd
That bolstering test though 😍
Yes I program them, super handy
Another great car review Sarah, enough said.
Sarah you spicy beauty! I'm going through you're videos laughing, throughly enjoying them. Keep em coming! 👍🏻
I hate buffeting in some of the newer cars.. kills the ability to have the window rolled down without being annoying.. Thanks for the review
Awesome video Sarah! Great SUPRA!
Thanks for the great review and the metric fuel consumption! A nice upgrade to this car would be them fixing the wind buffeting. It's a ridiculous defect on a car that begs to be driven with the windows down!
I'm all for the Celina gt model. That car with just a bit different front end and just a little coupish style would work well. I enjoy your channel Sarah. You do a great job. You can make me laugh, when I need it most! Love and prayers to you. Come drive my '21 Honda Accord Sport 2.0t!
Damn auto correct! Celica!
Those older models. I had an '83 Celica GT Coup. It had the retractable headlights instead of the peekaboos. And don't forget the Clarion cassette deck with the analogue tuner.
The buttons marked 1 - 8 are shortcuts for the i-drive system not just radio presets, you can use them for presetting the radio but you would only need one button for that. Read the owners manual or just start playing with them. They are super useful once you get to figure out what you need them for.
Fun fact- that’s the same engine in the 15+ mini JCW! Pops and bangs and all
I love it That Toyota Supra 2.0T Is Faster Than a VW Golf R or Mercedes AMG A45S
Sarah, Love your reviews!
I originally owned an SX 1990 Celica and currently have a 2001 ZR Celica (Australia). I would love it if Toyota resurrected the Celica nameplate, on the correct type of car of course. Great concept idea.
For some people that can't afford the extra 8k usd (12k in Canada for me) this entry level supra is a gift from Toyota. Still has the great style, at the cost of lower power. But it still puts a smile on your face! It really opens up a whole new market, yes i will regret the Supra 3.0 , but i will enjoy the 2.0 very much so! getting the 2022 as soon as they can build n ship it!
Did you gey it?
I actually select favorite radio stations into this numbers 😂
Olskool, lol.
I test drove the 2.0 Supra a couple of times recently. I actually really loved the look though the fake vents are inexcusable for this price range. Also, no performance brakes is a joke for any sports car over $40,000 brand new. The brakes felt mushy with some poor bite. I love the interior and the seats. Power was fine. The base model (without the safety and tech package) has some awful standard speakers. You gotta get the Tech package with the JBL audio. I was almost going to purchase one though I decided to go a different route. The 3.0 Supra with the safety and tech package would be the way I would go as you get a lot for a little more. Great car. I can see this car be an insurance monster in a few years like the FRS was in the mid to late 2010's as it will attract the tuner market.
I really like your reviews and the Celica/Supra is a great idea. I remember way back when, there was a noticeable difference between the models. This review made me hungry with all the food references....spicy mustard, cooking and the "watermelon" manicure.
If the number buttons are anything like the ones in a BMW, and I'm guessing they are, you can assign shortcuts to menu screens to them. That's pretty useful.
And phone numbers for quick dialling
I agree with your comment about the "lifetime" transmission fluid. That's a manufacturers thing, the ZF website, the company that builds them recommends changing the fluid every 80-120k km. Which I think converts to every 50-75k miles.
YES you are our favourite ! As always a great review and agree entirely should restyle & name, Ax
The reason that manufacturers make the base models look like "watered down" versions of the top model is to get us to buy $8000 worth of stuff we don't need and will never use. It's also why options now come in packages. If you want full instrumentation you have to buy the package with dual lighted vanity mirrors, six way power rear seats and twenty four sub woofers. Thanks for some great and insightful reviews.
Sarah, for the wind buffeting, when u rolled the drivers window down, if u roll the passenger side down about an inch to inch and a half, buffeting goes away like “magic”
Great review Sarah !
Everytime I see that MONSTER decal on that garage door, I think of INitial D Emperor Evo's
In america, where the 6 cyclinder isn’t much more money than the 4 cylinder, it doesn’t make sense to buy this. In europe and asia, the 6 cylinder costs waaaay more than the 4
I program the numbers it's easy and fast.put a Manual trans in it then you might have a reason to by it.
I've only seen two of this ones here, one in white and another in yellow; it's enough car to enjoy it imo.
Can't wait to here you review the 400z
Your French is just amazing 🤣 and I love your videos 😙
We need a calendar with you and the cars with the scores at the bottom. Givem the beans Sarah. Or quotes...of which there are plenty.
I totally agree on bringing a Celica, creating more value for the Supra 2.0. We could see both cars getting popular, just like the Stinger is at the moment. I think the Supra 2.0 is freaking cool, an odd ball that will pickup value. Cause they won't sell that many.
I had a Volvo C70 with "lifetime" transmission fluid. The problem is their definition of "lifetime". I changed the fluid (using the cooler source and return lines) and the performance improved immensely. And yes, if there's going to be a 4 cylinder version it should be called a Celica.
No, would not make any sense calling it a Celica. The 86 would be the natural successor to the Celica. The 2.0 Supra is way to close in so many ways to the 3.0 Supra.
@@realitycheck469 I'm thinking more along the lines of when the Celica and the Supra were a shared platform back in the early to mid 80s. For that reason I would also say the 86 is more of a successor to the RWD Corolla GTS of the same era than the Celica. Doesn't matter really, I doubt Toyota will ever bring back the Celica nameplate.
Ach zo! Baader Mainhof Wagen, ja? Nice car, though. Fantastic review again, Sarah!