I performed research in protein biology for several years in my training. It is absolutely impossible to preserve soft tissue for millions of years. Every living cell has lysosomes which contain enzymes called proteases. Once the cell dies these proteases are released and they digest all the proteins (you don't need microbes to eat the proteins). Cross-linking proteins with iron does not stop this process. That's why in research, immediately after harvesting animal tissue specimens, we snap froze them in liquid nitrogen, ground them up in a solution of powerful protease inhibitors and then froze the slurry in a -80 freezer. I distinctly recall my professor yelling at me because the snap-frozen specimen began to thaw in the protease inhibitor solution prior to getting ground up by the "blender". He said "it's too late, the proteases have already been released, the sample is garbage" and he tossed it into the trash before my very eyes.
It's amazing that you had this opportunity and knowledge. If You had to give me your best guess on what you know in biology, What is the age of these dinosaurs bones???
It was explained almost 25 years ago not too long after the initial discovery. But people like this guy like to pretend there has been no advancements in paleonology, or any science except when they think it supports their position.
@@jasonjekyll8576 Well they claim that all organic material has been calcified into what for all intents and purposes is pseudo-rock at least, certainly shouldn't be able to be dipped in some lab solution and become dino jerky gristle again right??
Most likely a pig bone buried out back by senior staff.. to indoctrinate the next generation and swindle grant money from wealthy widows ..science has been infiltrated and corrupted ..like every other facet of human slave nation aka civilization
@@eddieo4808 Actually that's how the creationists have been doing it. Finding objects and refusing to have them properly validated and just claiming it's a real thing, and then using it as evidence to keep donations flowing in to support their cause. Kent Hovind, Carl Baugh, Ken Hamm would excellent examples for this way of operating. Make a claim, give unverifiable evidence, kick back and rake in the money from 'believers'. Scientists on the other hand submit their findings to the world at large, and those findings are open to scrutiny along with all evidence if that is possible in the situation. Either in the form of raw material or in test methodology usually. And the world's scientists work to find problems in their claims. If the claim cannot be debunked it gains acceptance until new info arrives, if ever, that might alter those claims. It's an ongoing thing and never ends. Religion though, make a claim, repeat it for decades with no real peer review allowed.
@@avi8r66 any creationist in academia ..would not have findings or theories publicised by the press or discussed in universities(rockefeller indoctrination institutes)
@@jholyroller6048 Yup... in order to keep you in fear (at any moment a black hole could gobble us up or an asteroid will wipe us out - therefore your life meaningless and it doesn't matter how you behave...)
Moritur malefactor et ad oras Acheruntis pervenit. Dicit infilici Orcus, "Tria [lumina in regno meo sunt. In uno ex eis manebis ad perpetuitatem. Licet tibi autem flumen designare in quo manebis. veni ut flumina aspicias ante designatum. " Orcum sequitur mortuus ad flumina. In primo, multi videntur qui clamant, corpora quatientes. "Noll- in hoc flumen introire! Noli introire! Flumen cera fervens! "In secunda, multi videntur qui clamant, corpora quatientes. "Noli in hoc flumen introire! Noli inttoire! Flumen nix conglacians frigore!" In tertia, multi videntur qui murmurant, corpora minime quatientes. "Quid est illud?" Orcum rogat malefactor. "Quid dicunt illi?" "Flumen stercoris," inquit. "Dicunt illl- semper ·Noli undas facere! Noll- undas facere!'
I drill oil wells, we find the dino level , jurassic to cretaceous at 5000 to 2000 ft deep. there is no genetic material at that level, what we find we call rock !
Thousands of "dinosaur" bones have been found near the surface - if you are finding them at 5,000 to 2,000 ft deep, at what elevation are you when you begin drilling?
@@WhirledPublishing he didn't say he was finding dinosaur fossils, but through the drilling process it is common to find fossils of various types. Mainly tiny marine organisms or plant material. The elevation you begin drilling at doesnt much matter, as its the type of rock and strata you're going through. I'm not a geologist but the reason elevation doesn't matter is becsuse there are many large ares all over the world at different elevations, but contain similarly aged strata, or periods where they seem to have never existed in that area.
@@nunyabisnass1141 When you become aware of the three most common ways that mountain elevations rise up, when various mountain elevations began rising up - and why - the rate of the increase in the mountain elevations - and why - and the forces involved in the rapid rise of mountain elevations, you'll realize why the elevations matter. I've re-read your first comment a few times - when you refer to the "5000 to 2000 ft deep" as "the dino level, jurassic to cretaceous" having only "rock", you're saying your professional experience and exposure to these depths does not corroborate the published claims from ?paleontologists? ? That's what you're saying? If you can let me know the cities you're drilling in, I can look up the elevations. Thank you for your comment and your reply.
The creation model doesn't claim that dinosaurs fossils are 6k years old. The model asserts that dinosaurs were preserved by Noah 4300 years ago and survived for some time after the flood event.
Ahh Noah! The worst incest story in the Bible. So, we all came from these people from the ark without genetic problems from inbreeding? Also how did they last 1 day in the ark without being killed from animal methane?
@@anthonysmith778 "Also how did they last 1 day in the ark without being killed from animal methane?" Windows, look them up. "The worst incest story in the Bible." You don't know what "incest" is, let alone the bible. Noah had a wife and so did the 3 men with him. Let's talk shop atheist, don't YOU believe that you came from an ape, and before that a rat, and before that a worm and before that a germ and before that a magical puddle of mud? Very "scientific." You're devolved BTW; the rat, worm, germ and mud puddle all know and agree that there's no such thing as spontaneous generation, but YOU, the atheist, believe in it, don't you? "So, we all came from these people from the ark without genetic problems from inbreeding?" When your monkey forefather first stood upright and mated wasn't it engaged in incest and inbreeding... and beastiality to boot? Must have been. In your atheist, evolutionist model, incest, animal sex, child sex and like behaviors are simply "survival of the fittest." Sex with animals producing viable offspring "without genetic problems?" That's atheism in a nutshell, moral AND "scientific." Sounds like maybe you haven't thought this through at all. Ahh, the "moral," "scientific" atheist, perhaps an even greater hoax than evolution itself. Lastly, "genetic problems," from inbreeding is a direct result of the precious "mutations over time" at the center of your oft debunked theory. The very cornerstone of atheist belief proves, yet again, that mutations , no matter how many years you give them, have no power to build life. Ultimately, mutations degrade and destroy a genome and ALL the life that depends on it. Add as many zeros as you want to the calendar, the problem only gets worse. Because Darwinism DEVOLVES and evolution is a hoax. But thanks for playing.
@@anthonysmith778- there were no mutations in that time. It wasn’t until the 15th century BC were the Israelites forbidden to marry close relatives. U need to do a bit more research.
@@anthonysmith778yes, but what's your point? You don't know the genetic makeup they had. You don't know what the incidence of issues was with that at that time. The Bible tells us those people were living hundreds of years, some nearly a millenia. Something was clearly different.
@3:25 We know when that "sandstone" covered it and we know when the "prehistoric" creatures died all across North America because the cataclysm is documented in different languages by people more than 10,000 miles apart - and then corroborated in more languages by people that observed the destruction - these languages include Japanese, French, Russian, etc.
@@jesussaves1875 The destruction across North America killed the "prehistoric" creatures and most of the humans living there - the public isn't told about this so the evidence comes as a shock but look at it this way: In 1492, "Columbus sailed the ocean blue" and "discovered America" - he didn't discover America, he didn't set foot in America but that's the lie we were told... "Columbus proved the Earth was round" ... How does sailing from Spain to the Caribbean prove the Earth was round? That's another lie exposed ... ( keep going ) 1500's ... 1600's ... 1700's ... virtually no reports - and no "education" about North America except for the Mayflower, etc., in the early 1600's ... consider this lack of reports on "America" as the "royal families" seized control of Europe, Africa, the Middle East, India and the rest of Asia, as well as Latin America, and then in the early 1800's, "Australia". King George of England - seized control of Australia - from Holland - by shipping more than 9,000 prisoners to stake their claim on "New Holland" which then became known as "Australia" ... "World History" from the 1500's through the late 1700's and early 1800's doesn't tell us much about North America but we know Spain was staking their claim on the Philippines and most of Latin America, as England was staking their claim on much of the world... what are the reports from North America throughout the 1500's, 1600's and 1700's? "Indians", some fur trappers and some "civilized people" colonizing eastern regions of North America ... ships sailed from dozens of countries, staking claims on dozens and dozens and dozens of regions across Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Russia, India, China, Peru, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Mexico, etc., etc., and yet what reports do we have from the "wild wild west" of North America from the 1500's, 1600's, 1700's and early 1800's? Think about it. "Ancient" people were mining gold, creating statues of gold, jewelry of gold, etc. - in Africa, the Middle East, India, etc., as billions and billions of dollars in gold in California and Alaska was untouched until the mid and late 1800's? Because no one "discovered" the western regions of America until very late in our human history - even though Spanish ships were sailing between Mexico and the Philippines throughout the 1500's, 1600's, 1700's ... ? Do your best to pause a bit to realize a colossal piece of "American" history is being withheld from us - then ask yourself why.
@@WhirledPublishing There is an even bigger asteroid (the biggest crater in the world) that hit Vredefort region in Africa - it melted the granite, which you can see flowed at a quarry site... if you look carefully you can see another partial crater in Madagascar - it is probably the reason Madagascar is not part of Africa anymore (it was not just one asteroid but many) At the Bering Strait Russia and North America are separated by only 80km (with an island at the 40km mark) most "native" Americans share DNA with the Siberians and Chinese - have a look at Siberian native dress. There are sites all over the world (including the famous melted stone stairs in Egypt) and burn marks (also vitrified stone) at many of the Megalithic building across the entire earth from Peru to Egypt, even India has evidence of an ancient nuclear event. This I believe was before current creation because all these events (the Black mat and Iridium anomaly) and the sabre tooth cats etc all became extinct between 12800 and 14000 years ago. Too much evidence to ignore
@@jesussaves1875 Evidence: Since old stone buildings are also covered in melted rock - in numerous locations across our Earth - with no craters nearby - the theories of "melted granite in craters caused by asteroids" is exposed as more nonsense concocted by those seeking status and money rather than truth. Please stop believing idiots - do decades of research, compile thousands of independent sources, and review the facts instead of believing "theories" from lunatics - no need to guess or speculate about the history of our Earth because it's all documented by our ancestors - theories are unnecessary - those that cling to theories are exposing themselves as lacking integrity. To claim that "prehistoric" saber-tooth tigers lived thousands of years ago is not evidence - it's idiotic nonsense exposed by thousands of other independent sources. Since melted rock comes from two historically-documented sources - by those who witnessed it - claims of "asteroid impacts" millions of years ago are also exposed as lunacy - do the research instead of believing people that make unsubstantiated claims. The timeline for our Earth's continents, mountains, oceans and cataclysms is documented - it does not go back millions of years - it does not go back thousands and thousands of years - the timeline is shockingly short. You're free to believe what you want but if you upload lies onto a public forum, someone who cares about the truth enough to do over 50 research of research and to compile thousands of independent sources is likely to object to the lies.
@@WhirledPublishing When an asteroid hits it causes an air burst and depending on it's trajectory - where it passes over sea the sea will boil... like I said, have a look at the molten granite at Vredefort...
@Tim C it matters because if it was debunked, then it wouldn't be used as a scientific dating method. The fact that it is still used as a reliable and accurate dating method and that you have no credible sources supporting your claim, shows that your biased opinion is irrelevant.
@@NothingIsImposible09 Massive glaciers result from massive mountains which result from magma rising up in the cracks between the broken tectonic plates - this is one of the ways that we know we are not told about all the broken edges - because some of the mountain ranges are not documented with broken tectonic plates - for example, in Antarctica and in Greenland. The timeline for the broken tectonic plates is documented in dozens and dozens of old records - the force that broke the tectonic plates - in the Mediterranean, in South Asia, along the Pacific Ring of Fire - which includes Antarctica - beneath the Himalayas, etc., is also documented: continental drift and continental collision are preposterous nonsense. The timeline for the frozen mammoths - and the mass deaths of "prehistoric" animals and fossilized creatures, etc. - is also recorded by our ancestors - no need to look far because the age of our Earth - and the age of the Siberian lands in particular - is shockingly young - and it's all documented by our ancestors. For example, Vedic texts tell us the Indus and Ganges Rivers also froze, and other reports from Europe give us the timeline for these extreme temperatures, while other evidence tells us "why" - no need to wonder about any of this - it's all documented by our ancestors - including the timeline for our Earth's expansion - which was shockingly recent - add the timeline for our continents, oceans, mountains, cataclysms, etc. - our ancestors documented it all - including the timeline for the Antarctic mountains, the Antarctic glaciers, the Antarctic ice shelves, the Antarctic volcanic eruptions, etc. - documentation from our ancestors also includes when and why Greenland - which was previously "green" - became a land of mountains and glaciers - I've told you into how this happens - you just need to know the force that breaks the tectonic plates - which is documented - so then you need to know "when" - which is also documented - repeatedly - in over a dozen different languages from all across our Earth - all of this was shockingly recent and we've been lied to about all of it. Our mountains, continents and oceans are not millions and billions of years old - they're not thousands and thousands of years old - our continents, oceans and mountains are all SHOCKINGLY young - when you know the three major ways that mountains are formed, you will begin to realize how amazingly deceived we have been. Vedic texts are also not thousands of years old - the original Hebrew texts are not thousands of years old - ancient Egypt is not thousands of years old - ancient Persia is not thousands of years old - ancient Greece is not thousands of years old - ancient Rome is not thousands of years old, ancient China is not thousands of years old ... the deception is conspicuous, devious, sinister, nefarious, diabolical, demonic and evil to the core - but few notice it - most are satisfied with clinging to the lies - of those who do notice, very few look beyond the web of lies to see the truth about our world - because they're programmed to believe it's not possible to know - which is part of the evil programming.
@@an.d.m.a Darwin himself wrestled with many doubts and problems in his own theory. Just on example of this is the eye. Darwin said to think the complexity of the eye emerged through natural selection was absurd, yet you claim this has all been proven out. So what is your explanation for this amount of complexity? What is your proof toward the beginnings of life? How do you reconcile the Cambrian explosion? Darwin’s Theory brilliantly accounts for animal adaptation, but origin of life???
And the mud fossils (i.e. those at fontainebleau rock forest - France) or the Nodosaur (Canada I think) that was so well preserved it is still whole (skin, flesh, bones and meal included)
I was at one stage an ardent proponent of evolution. Science has changed my mind. We have no idea how the molecules that compose living systems would of come together in a way that they could work in concert to for fill the simplest of biologys functions. For Organic Chemists the parameters of temperature,pressure,solvents,light or none, pH, atmospheric gases or none, all have to be carefully controlled in order to build complex molecular structures. This cannot happen randomly. We have learnt that mutations cannot be mechanisms for accuring change that results in macro evolution. Plus the greatest enemy of evolution,that of time and decay. We know so little. Science is the beginning of a long journey. It has barely dripped it's toe in the water and has an ocean to cross. Someone once said, the beginning of knowledge is realising and admitting we know nothing and can not explain what we see. The issues of the mind and consciousness and I would go on......... We are finite beings and the numbers are so indeterminately great against us been the produce of happen stance and chance.
@@hansdemos6510 Do we have increasing information in biology? No. Never demonstrated. In every single test it has always been the opposite. Always. Yet, we have all the ardent "scientist" bangin' away(you) about macro evolution which has time and time again proven wrong. For macro evolution to even PARTIALLY be scientific at all, only a small subset of increasing information via mRNA/DNA in any process has to be proven and yet in all cases... we are always shown less, not more as we understand that all that DNA RNA etc has to be shoved through complex 3D shapes in order to make proteins. It is not a 2d photo copier. Stop running away by using lots of word smithing to grasp at the word "ardent" instead of science.
@@hansdemos6510 You claim to be logical yet cannot see how "information in biology' increasing, decreases or stays the same does not matter? Are you truly going to claim this? Is this where the world mocks you or treats you like a 6 year old? You cannot have macro evolution without increased information. The Ecoli and fruit fly experiments which have 100,000's of generations have not increased information to evolve into higher species. Just more selected species with SMALLER sets of DNA/rMNA. That is not macro evolution, Hell, most would consider that DeEvolution. For you to prove evolution you MUST increase information.
@@hansdemos6510 Genius: appears you do not know what "RATE OF MUTATION" means. It certainly does not mean accumulated = more DNA. All it means is that the existing DNA in question was MORE rapidly mutating AKA DEGENERATING. Well duh, that is what happens when one adds in mutation of existing DNA, the organism can be optimized within its DNA range and then it completely falls apart. No one rational cares what wikipedia says. Rather everyone who is rational cares about the actual outcome. Evolution as taught is the upward progression of ever more complex biological structures via mutation and survival of the fittest.... Wikipedia's definition is just bogus baloney. Why? Allele sampling of existing information, not its creation, to pop in the next generation is not evolution.
How about the evidence for the animal kinds? Let's say we want to know if sea turtles are the same kind as the Galapagos tortoises. First we look at the turtles which can still reproduce today. And we find from those, that they each have a beak and specific nails. This shows they might be features which do not change. So, we look at the Galapagos tortoise, and it also has the same beak and nails. So, then we look at the sea turtle. It has the same beak and nails (even though it has skin covering most of the nails). This means the ancestors of the Galapagos tortoise, river turtles, tortoises, even the sea turtles, are biologically related. Their ancestors have reproduced together in the past. They are the same kind. This shows creatures bare signature features which do not change. And by their signature features, we can identify their kind.
@@patldennis There is a difference between commonly shared features, and signature features. You wouldn't make two different cars and claim they're biologically related, because of commonly shared features. Creatures are different. They have the ability to reproduce. Therefore, in producing new offspring, signature features always remain the same. Therefore, only the creatures sharing signature features are biologically related.
@@patldennis To clarify signature features, it means a certain feature which does not change which makes that creature unique. Two different creatures must share at least two of these if we are to scientifically conclude they are biologically related. Like the molars and hooves of all cattle. Or the front teeth and claws of all rodents, etc.
@@patldennis Common features, are features shared throughout multiple kinds. Signature features, are features shared throughout no more than one kind. Features like venom pits and the jaw bones might be signature features, though it needs research.
@@patldennis So with cattle and rodents, they share common features like the appearance of the hyrax and gopher, but only upon closer examination, do we see the rodent claws and rodent teeth do not match the hyrax, yet the cattle hooves and cattle molars do. Therefore, we know with assurity the hyrax has never been related to the rodent kind, but is biologically related to the cattle kind.
@@patldennis A kind is a group of biologically related creatures. Biologically related creatures must possess at least 2 signature features for them to scientifically be concluded to be biologically related. A signature feature is one which makes a group of creatures unique and belongs to one group of creatures. Once a kind is found, then comparisons with them and other creatures are made to identify the common features and to further identify signature features. To find which creatures are not related and to find which other creatures are related. The more these things are used, the more they're perfected. For example, knowing goats and sheep possess the same skull and hooves, which neither rodents nor weasels share, we are able to make predictions of other creatures having the same skull as goats and sheep. Deer, bison, gazelle, moose, antelope, camels, cows, and horses for example, all share the same skull when compared to rodents and weasels. Therefore I predict these all have hooves like the sheep and goat. And after researching it, they all do. Therefore, I have found a "Kind." Therefore all other commonalities that the rodents and weasels happen to share with the cattle, are common features, no different than a truck and a car having 4 wheels.
@Tim C incorrect, Tim. Your religion isn't even the oldest one still in practice! Hinduism is! But also, Egyptian gods were dying and coming back 3 days later over 2000 years before the first "biblical writings" and the Sumerian myths are even older than that. So this shows your level of knowledge about the subject lol
If you can be fooled about things going on in present time, just think how you can be deceived about things from a hundred, a thousand or more years ago.
Why are most of these findings not buried much at all? After 60 millions of years I'd expect to find the fossils mostly buried deeply. In some places the fossils are almost stacked on top of one another, as if they died in mass during a catastrophe.
So, some tissue, under the right conditions, can survive for millions of years, or those tissues either aren't from a triceratops, or triceratops lived longer than previously thought.
What special conditions? Appears to originate from the same conditions as any other fossil. As well,, now they are finding soft tissue in fossils everywhere.
@@VaxtorTI've no idea. There are countless variables to consider. I gave three possible explanations for finding soft tissue from a fossil too old for that to be the case. Option 4 is that this is BS.
@@erso3302 Soft tissue was first found in a T-Rex bone. The truth is that dinosaurs perished during the Biblical Flood.; which buried them rapidly with sediment. Hence the very reason we now have a fossil record.
I don't think that the dating is the problem here. If soft tissue as we know doesn't generally survive past several tens of thousends of years (which we know it can in some VERY specific conditions as some ice age mummies are preserved with it) and definately doesn't survive past several hundreds of thousends or milions, it would imply that dinosaurs lived several hundreds of thousends years ago at best. And we know it's not true, because of dating methods including the ones that account for soft tissue but also other ones like the C14 carbon degradation method or simply because we know how geological processes work. So we can say for sure that the life on our planet dates several hundred milions of years. That's why I think what is in play here is perhaps a process we do not know about that we haven't discovered yet. Further more it could be a process impossible for us to discover because to observe it we would have to literally keep observing a live fossilization process going on for milions of years and no human can live that long not even the entire humanity.
Do you ever wonder why you like people who are either lying or know so little about science? Wouldn't you reather rely on people who are smart and tell the truth?
@@scottytomlin705 your that sophisticated nice intelligent interesting sort of person who shows the world all that he is with his every word and comment. A true class act well trained in the ways of Twitter Facebook the Nordic people's have a word for people like you TROLL look into this they are soooo very Feel free to fill in the blank
I want to see what happens if the use that technique on a trilobite and see if anything is left in supposed Cambrian period like 500 million year old supposedly.
In Highschool back in the 70's I was very interested in Anthropologie. One day I asked the course instructor a simple question, Mr _________ how do you explain the evolution of the eye? He changed to all sorts of colors especially fire engine red. I was asked to go to my counselors office, change class, and I had to take a drop fail from his class.
@@Scoobywoo7447 Like what... what evolved first... the eyes or the ears (not to mention - how did male and female evolve to meet at exactly the right time and place to procreate - I mean we know we all come from one woman - mitochondrial dna proves this... if she self -procreated explain the other 23 Chromosomes that complete the pairs - for example the XY pairing for males)
@@Scoobywoo7447 You need more faith to believe in evolution than in God... But those who wish that there is no God will get exactly what they wish for... an eternity devoid of God and all of His goodness!
@@jesussaves1875 the explanations for things are plausible too I just dont get behind them as the time scale is way way way off they claim millions of years so they can use the lie of minute changes over extended time and yet in the 100 years (yes is far less than millions) we have yet to see one single mutation that benefits any creature from our studies of mould cultures for near on 200 years to the fruit fly experiment nothing changes on the macro scale
@@patldennis with the evidence of drawings and artifacts of the past prove you wrong, sir. Theres drawings of spots on the dragon's (dinodogs) that wasn't know until soft tissue of dragon skin was found, with spots on it. Do some research , good grief.
Without taking sides the one burning question which was neither asked nor answered is how often is soft tissue found in fossils. Is it a common occurrence or rare? Just curious.
Certainly not. Young earth clearly defined in the Bible, is a week during Creation. Creation week followed by a week of Mankind's rule, sixth day of Man's creation followed by Man's rule. Man sinned at the end of the seventh day, giving us Perfect 7000 years of the Garden + 6000 years of young earth, roughly. lucipher certainly fell prior and ruled the earth when Man was still in the Garden for a 1000 years. Week (7000 yrs) of Mankind fallen from Grace state, corrected By God during the half or mid week point of the second week. Christ at Calvary. The last day Sabbath is always a day of rest. We are approaching the 13'000 year mark of Creation. Corrupted earths date is not calculable, currently. We do not know when satan fell, we know the fallen angels fell after Man was created and seduced by lucifer though. Scriptures' state the Watchers of the Heavens looked and saw the daughters of man were fair. This is post Garden, and post fallen Mankind.
@@abashedsanctimony154 You regurgitate a demonic deception as if it is divine because you are deceived. The bible never says God created Earth 6,000 years ago - you copy off someone else's work instead of doing your own and now you are exposed as a liar: To take the timeline in the bible and overlay it onto the fake historical timeline where Julius Caesar, Cleopatra and the rest of the "ancient civilizations" existed thousands of years ago is to be deceived - you believe it is true because that is what you have been programmed to believe by satanic "scholars" that are propped up and paraded around by the pedovore overlords that control our world. You are free to believe what you what but the timeline you believe in is deception - it is a psy-op - it is a fraud, a farce, a scam, a sham and intentional disinfo - do the research, study the evidence so you can see the evil with your own eyes - because as it stands, you are a liar. You should probably read what God has planned for "all liars".
@@WhirledPublishing It does, it states In Six days God created the Heavens and the earth. The Seventh He rested. Then sometime during Adams existence Adam fell. His would be week Two of Young earth Creation. A day to God is as a thousand years.
@Tim C Possible, Remember that God created the Heavens and the Earth and All things.. but..Augustine's original teachings claim that angels had to be created within creation, and quite early to quote "Augustine places the creation of the angels on the first day (XI, 9) because they had to be created before the earth was created, and they populated the City of God. The angels were illuminated by the true light that created them, the light that St. John speaks of in the beginning of his Gospel" They (Trinity) created the Earth and light, which if we are consistent, we would place angels either day *one* . With the light bearers, which Christ is the Sun and so are angels which reflect his nature or day four. Gen 1:14 And God said, “Let there be *lights* in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, 15 and let them be *lights* in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.” And it was so. 16 God made two great lights-the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the *stars* . 17 God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning-the fourth day." And , if this is true, it is very possible Lucipher certainly fell directly after seeing all. That God had created. Which is where he began to realize he was the second pinnacle of Creation. If you see where I am going with this. It would be Man was first. Although to satan he thought very little of Man that communicated with God in a relationship. Lucipher also was given the world. So Man being in dominion over the earth. Lucipher over the heaven and the throne worship, felt vastly superior. it is actually satan that fell and waited to figure out Adam and Eves weakness. This was not a short duration. Adam had a long relationship with God and over all the animals of the earth's surface having named them all after seeing their nature, function etc.
@Tim C People want to emotionally create their own view of creation. If you realize this, you will realize God created Man on day Six, then rested. That is two thousand years because it states God rested and then looked and saw lucipher was filled with darkness. lucipher had it for awhile. And God knew by the change in him, which caused many angels to begin to sway and lucipher no doubt would have been using his power to sway them. Picture a kingdom and a rival in the parliament changing the minds of members of the house. I do not agree with using philosophy, but Christ said lucipher has a kingdom and gods pantheism, occupy it. He is deceiving all into his own way. Christ is the Way, and holds the true Kingdom. Either way, I saw this as literal. Because it's a literally true Book of history and spiritual events. I say it's close to 13000 years. And we love on a flat plane with a enclosed firmament that is separate from the upper heavens where there is a sea of glass. Certain false teachers keep claiming the sea of glass is a metaphor, yet nothing leaves this earth, through Jacobs ladder but God allows it. Blessings in Christ.
No humans that have no understanding of God make up things for their viewpoint becoz they cannot take the truth that God created this universe and you in particular- you don’t want to hear that we are all fallen humans thru Adam and eves rebellion-‘The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? Jeremiah 17:9-we are all sinners in need of a Savior-therefore God provided Jesus to ‘once and for all’ take all our sin and pay the price it-Have you u even read genesis? Ask yourself what sin you think is worth ending up in hell for-hate, lying, abortion, lust......
@@jeanniestanley7728 I have read the bible and the more i read it the more i realized it was full of crap. Adam and eve are nothing more than a story evolution proves that .
@Tim C LOL that is so laughable 2 angelical christian scientists say they found the resting place of the ark. yet hundreds of real scientists have visited the area and find no wood no nails NOTHING. Good luck with your delusion .
@@gctcauto No, I think people do not understand that a God that can create all space and time can tailor the progression of it all in any manner he pleases. Also, nowhere in the bible will you find a 6,000 year old earth claim. Such idiocy is ascribed by man. Kill a rabbit, throw it in the field, come back 2 years later and tell me how much soft tissue you can recover.
@@FelonyVideos So, scientific can not work because God can Manipulate anything anyway at any time meaning there is no stability. Also, for your rabbit to become a fossil you need to bury Immediately after it dies.
@@gctcauto Are you, by any chance, Kathy Neusom? I didn't say anything of the sort. You're just making assumption after assumption. In the end, you'll give up on one or the other, the bible or science. I'm a man of both science and God. I do not require the two to explain everything, or to even be consistent with one another. Mankind went hundreds of years thinking F=m*a. While a fantastic discovery, and very useful for understanding, we now know that it is not a law, and only approximates reality in a limited subset of regimes of velocity. Likewise, I am OK with radio dating, even though it too may be limited to certain regimes, unless a correction factor is discovered. Also likewise, I do not embrace those who purport to estimate ages and times based upon a sequential reading of the old testament. And, no, I do not believe that time has always passed at the rate that we presently perceive. There is nothing in science, or the bible, that suggests otherwise. There is not even anything in science that proves that time even exists at all. Think about that! You see, one assumption after another leads us to incorrect conclusions. I don't have all the answers, but then, neither does anyone else!
@@FelonyVideos You said and I quote. "That a God can create all space and time can tailor the progression of it all in any manner he pleases. That literally makes science useless, because God can do anything and make anything look any way. You CAN NOT have a God that can Manipulate reality in any way he wants at any time and be able to discover things that are constant or true about the universe because nothing is constant about the universe.
@Tim C bible is demonstrably false, but hey, people think star trek is real too... There's plenty of people who think fiction is real... Bible is just old fiction.
Evolution occurs within the lifespan of the creature and from one generation to the next - millions of years is a hoax, a psy-op, deception, intentional disinfo, etc.
What about the geological processes that fossiizes matter? That alone takes millions of years. I'm not saying they're wrong, I just think that we as a species do not have a full understanding of how time works. It seems every discovery only leads to more questions.
Fossilization does not take millions of years. Depends on many variables. Size, amount of pressure from sediment that buries it, etc. we have found fossilized dogs from 100 years ago
@@robertlandin40 probably true but I choose not to give up. Check out Bryan Nickel YT channel and watch his 6 part videos on the flood. You can't argue intelligently with his proofs and science.
So the soft tissue was inside of tissue that was fossilized or a rock so did that preserve it? Could the fossilization have happened quicker than scientist thought possible could soft tissue survive inside fossils?
Fossilized anything is the absorbation af calcium through the entire specimen. Nothing would be available to "survive" this process by definition of whst fossilization is.
Seems like an all powerful being would be able to communicate in a more effective, less subject to interpretation way, especially with creatures he created for the sole purpose of praising him.
@@Irene-iu9sj ikr? This stuff isn't even funny. Like how is one able to shelter themslves so well that they can protect themslves from fragnents of reality that must pccasiobally slip in?
The dinosaur bones are hundreds of years old - not thousands of years old - illustrations, statues, engravings, etc., tell us the true timeline for them - which corroborates the true timeline for the old literature from the Hebrews, the Greeks, the Hindus, etc.
@@WhirledPublishing *Fossilized* bones have to have been buried around the time of the flood, because a flood is one of the only explanations that can cause fossilization on a global scale. Bones don't typically fossilize at all. Though there may have been dinosaurs after the flood, it is very unlikely any of those bones were preserved.
It is the simplest explanation, but like the guy said, any answer that doesn't fit their worldview is thrown out. I once heard a quote from an evolutionist scientist say something like, "Evolution is impossible, but the alternative is unacceptable."
@@joegoodman8213 When you've studied Chemistry and Physics for decades - as I have - when you've studied Geological Formations, Wave Propagation and Cataclysms for decades - as I have - when you've become a Doctoral Scholar, an Expert Witness for the Court Judges and tested off the WAIS-R - as I have - when you've become multi-lingual and studied hundreds and hundreds of historic documents, written in over a dozen languages, going back over 600 years with reports going back to the early beginnings of our Earth - as I have - when you've studied the reports in the captain's logs from the sailing ships going back hundreds of years - as I have - when you've studied the reports in the diaries of the explorers - as I have - when you've studied the maps of the sonar images of the landslide debris on the seafloor that displaced massive volumes of seawater that launched colossal tsunami waves that decimated the lands and you correlate that destruction with the reports in the old documents to get the timeline for the top 10 cataclysms of all time, which includes the timeline for the broken and subducted tectonic plates, the timeline for the ocean trenches and archipelago islands, the timeline for our Earth's expansion, the timeline for Antarctica and Greenland, etc., when you've studied the history of illustrations, paintings, statuary, architecture, and the timeline for the megaliths, the timeline for music, linguistics and languages and the timeline for the advanced technologies, let's you and I sit down and have an intelligent conversation - now is not the time: The "fossilized bones" across Europe, northern Asia, Africa, and North America were NOT "buried" at the time of the flood of Genesis, the Grand Canyon is also NOT the result of the flood of Genesis - the cause of those fossilized bones and the timeline for them is documented by numerous sources in the old historic records - please do the decades of research - which includes compiling thousands of independent sources, written in over a dozen languages - so you can see the evidence with your own eyes, rather than staking your claims on fictions and lies. The "dinosaurs" lived AFTER the flood of Genesis - for hundreds of years AFTER the great flood - which was not thousands of years ago. If you study the reports from thousands of sources, you will clearly see the true timeline and realize you are mistaken.
Evolutionists just can not bring themselves to give honor and praise to HIM who lives forever even when the evidence reveals The True and Living GOD Creator of heaven and earth. Their faith is being destroyed and they just say "so what". The day is at hand where their saying "whoops we didn't know" won't do them any good. YET even now GOD THE SAVIOR would show them mercy if they would repent and believe. Those who trust THE LORD will not be ashamed, AMEN ! I pity them. (Thanks guys & Please keep sharing your findings while they still can be shared).
Evolution is NOT a fact. They have never found any transitional fossils. Any that they have claimed to be transitional fossils have turned out to be lies or a combination of ape and human bones. Also, it's amazing how we can watch a video of dinosuar fossils having soft tissue in them and people still think that these fossils are millions of years old.
Food for thought, this animal may have died with in the past thousand years, lending to another " what if " scenario, being this colossal creature might have only gone extinct not so long ago.
No dought ..that's a possibility There is certainly unknowns in ..our story..but much deception..I know dino bones in museums are composed if chicken bones ..they say the originals are radio active from the meteor event😄 The whole concept if dinosaur s was dreamed up by one if these "elite" families rich kid science larper I forget the details..they seem to have found some giant bones about the place however
Absolutely possible, that this creature survived somehow, just as was stated in this very video. However, and this is the key point here, such soft tissue samples have been found the world over, from all manner of species, and in various conditions. This evidence has become quite common, not merely an anomaly, as has been stated in paper after paper.
It’s because the world is not millions or billions of years old ! It’s only 6000 years old since death/entropy conquered the creation. As far as how long were the days of creation and till Adam fell into disobedience no one nows and it’s completely irrelevant because the creation was free of entropy then. Time as we know it started when man fell into sin and death entered the creation.
Even though evolutionary scientists cannot explain this, creation scientists are having a hard time of it also. How can tissue survive for even thousands of years exposed to the elements? I believe the answer is that, being closer to the perfection of the original creation, even flesh was of a higher quality. Perhaps a closer examination of the tissue would yield some interesting results.
Creation Science is an oxymoron. I hope you're aware that evolutionary scientists are biologists... have you not watched or read anything about Mary Schweitzer?
@@The144Kth I'm happy to hear you're not against vaccines at least. Evolutionary scientists study In the field of biology just in case ya didn't know... When imdead I'll be dead without a care
💖💕Next time someone asks you to prove that are text books are fiction and the bible is truth, just pull this up and sit back and enjoy the look on there faces. ✝️God is the creator. Period end of story. Genisis is History. 💖God bless you all
You do realize that your book of “truth” is a collection of plagiarized stories, from civilizations 1000’s of years before the time of your so called savior don’t you? Noah’s flood story is taken from the story of Gilgamesh, why does your so called book of “truth” contradict itself repeatedly? Get a grip, it is just a book.
@@meademorgan6614 I pray that one day you will accept Jesus christ as your lord and savior so that I can see you in heaven. The world must be a lonely cold dark place believing that you are in it alone. Don't allow pagen stories to take away your free gift of salvation. It is your free gift all you have to do is take it💖 you must know this in your heart or you wouldn't be watching this on TH-cam to start with. God bless you my friend. I'm praying for you because I want you to be free and see just how amazing life is when your living it with God on your side. I want you to know that your not alone and that your creator loves you. I want you to feel that love so much that you are overflowing with it and it shows in all your actions. 💖💖✝️God is with us, and he is for you my dear friend. 💖
This should be worth a noble prize. Such detailed facts would stand up to peer review and really debunk the accepted view of science. Of course, it’s rubbish and so isn’t.
It's called a "Nobel Prize". The research where tissue was found inside fossils has been demonstrated and proved. No scientists disagree with the findings. They concede the findings. They simply interpret it to mean that biological proteins can live 75 million years! That's the debate. It's not Nobel prize stuff dude. Nobel prize is not what you think it is lololol.
@@Telcontarnz Your comment is devoid of science. Please explain the findings of proteins inside fossils previously believed to be 75 million years old. Thanks.
Mary Schweitzer did the original publication on these findings. So Michael Gaunt, your explanation?! Her findings are generally accepted. So let's hear how you explain away these facts. Come on mister Nobel Prize watcher, are dinosaur bone fossils 75 million years old with intact bone marrow soft tissue components still in there?! Why is it rubbish, because it scares you?! Maybe your metaphysics are all wrong?! Maybe the universe did not create itself?! Spooky......
@@sliglusamelius8578 I dont claim to be a scientist...but I’m sure you will be able to point me to peer reviewed (not by young earth scientist, but real ones) that prose your point.
Next question: can we begin establishing the genome of this Triceratops,? Is the DNA halfway intact, enough to begin building segments of it anyway?! Or is that too far away from a more robust protein like collagen?
@@patldennis It would seem too much to ask for I suppose but the presence of proteins is quite interesting. If that be so then perhaps enough sorting around in the material might come up with some substantial pieces one would think if not whole sequences.
@@curbroadshow Without a Creator, we are left with the Laws of Men...shifting sand. The Biblical concept of God and that we are accountable to him, is the only way we can find actual Truth.
@@curbroadshow Jesus is THE Truth. Think of it this way...Man creates a Law...I don't like this Law...I think the Man that created this Law is a dork...I disobey this Law and kill the Man that made it...I create a new Law. See...without the ultimate authority that is God, there is zero accountability in Man. Which is why this world is in the state it's in presently. We as Americans have stopped honoring God and he will hold us accountable. Romans 1:20
A tree in Alberta Canada was instantly petrified when a high voltage electric wire discharged onto the tree. Electric ⚡️ Universe proposes the earth was hit with some electric charges in a disruption of the planets orbits 😳.
The tree story names "Eric Milton" and seems to only exist on a couple of forums pushing the electric universe stuff. And it doesn't describe an instant change, instead it describes a long duration exposure to a high power line in contact with the freshly cut down tree stumps. Fossilization involves saturation of the tissue, whether tree or animal (usually bones), with minerals, so you kinda need the minerals on hand, or you need the right mix of stuff for the electricity to convert it into that new material. Regardless, this story seems to just be a forum based story someone probably made up.
@@avi8r66 it is difficult to find the story on it but I assure you it did happen as I live in the area. And that is specifically why I said it. What we are being told as ancient fossils and petrifications does have other explanations and the story was easily accessible back in the beginning of the internet...the cover up is real .🤔
@@missfriscowin3606 How does you living in the area equate to proof it happened? That doesn't even make sense. And one weird incident doesn't lead to 'the cover up is real'. Perhaps it did occur as you describe more or less, but it would still have a rational explanation and not 'prove' all fossils are formed in minutes and only recently.
@@avi8r66 you need to relax...I was just pointing out my OWN observation. Take it as you will but no need to bash my comments with your BS claims it didn’t happen and oh this is wrong and that is righteous attitude. Lower you altitude aviator old man. 🤫
@@missfriscowin3606 Did you see this petrified stump and root system first hand? This is my point, you seem to believe 'this is said to have happened near me so it must be true'. This is not evidence for anything. Now, if you can find a more authoritative source on it I would love to read it. Right now all I can find is some questionable forum posts from 2014. If you are going to allow your world view to be influenced by information you should place a reasonably high bar on the quality of that information. That is all I ask. I don't care is a million people believe something, I want to know why they believe it. If that reason is good, it may have merit. Otherwise it's just gossip.
I'm curious, does any creationist apologist actually have ANY evidence, at all, of how old they think the earth is, because just claiming someone else's figures are wrong, is not providing any evidence for any other claimed age of the earth, is it?
Marco Polo reports what he describes as "huge serpents". The descriptions given sound in many ways no different than descriptions given of the dinosaurs in the text books.
We creationist believe in God the creator. Evolutionist don't believe in God. It is a waste of time to debate each other. Choose which one you want or believe. One chooses that life does not end, just changes location. The evolutionists believe when you are dead you are dead and that's it. Don't hate each other, just agree to disagree and move on. Teach the two together and let the individual choose.
@@nunyabisnass1141 I don't understand how you can say there is no tissue there when they literally showing it. Unless of course you are an anti realist.
Does their DNA have a read about blood? They used old numerology incorporated to discover that blood might have coded message. But I want to know if blood too was having a similar value. Later or prior astrology had some inclusive wreckage or saving. My thought is as words for talk are formed...the coded idea too. So astrology too seemed to have a similar idea
Sorry dude, they aren't lying. Just ask any evolutionary biologist. All of them, every single one, will admit that dinosaur soft tissue has indeed been found.
It’s a miracle that all that stuff can be found after 6,000 to 10,000 years..... Finding it after 50 to 150 million years 😳..... would be like Ocean Front property in Kansas....
Dinosaur bones are not thousands of years old - they're hundreds of years old - we know this because it's document in the old records, in literature, in illustrations, in statues, engravings, etc. - the public is lied to about the timeline for geology, paleontology, glaciology, volcanology, etc. - the true timeline for all this is clearly documented with thousands of corroborating sources.
@@WhirledPublishing .... some could be .... but most... like that horn they were showing at first .... are from the The Flood.... thousands and tens of thousands of fossils are piled up in huge beds...
@@thomasmyers9128 As a Doctoral Scholar who's been doing this research for over 50 years, I've compiled this evidence for decades: when and how the piles of dead "prehistoric" animals got there is documented in historic records - often with the exact date - as I mentioned - that's how we know it wasn't thousands of years ago.
@@WhirledPublishing .... You should of published your evidence 10 years before Dr Mary Schweitzer accidentally found it..... then you would of be well known.... instead of banging out your frustrations on a keyboard to someone you don’t know.... 😳
I performed research in protein biology for several years in my training. It is absolutely impossible to preserve soft tissue for millions of years. Every living cell has lysosomes which contain enzymes called proteases. Once the cell dies these proteases are released and they digest all the proteins (you don't need microbes to eat the proteins). Cross-linking proteins with iron does not stop this process. That's why in research, immediately after harvesting animal tissue specimens, we snap froze them in liquid nitrogen, ground them up in a solution of powerful protease inhibitors and then froze the slurry in a -80 freezer. I distinctly recall my professor yelling at me because the snap-frozen specimen began to thaw in the protease inhibitor solution prior to getting ground up by the "blender". He said "it's too late, the proteases have already been released, the sample is garbage" and he tossed it into the trash before my very eyes.
It's amazing that you had this opportunity and knowledge. If
You had to give me your best guess on what you know in biology, What is the age of these dinosaurs bones???
And can Dinosaurs be cloned???
I’ll be VERY interested in how “science” explains this one.
It was explained almost 25 years ago not too long after the initial discovery. But people like this guy like to pretend there has been no advancements in paleonology, or any science except when they think it supports their position.
@@nunyabisnass1141 Care to explain??
if there is soft tissue then it ain't a rock dumo
@@dennissherman863 fossils aren't rocks, so....
@@jasonjekyll8576 Well they claim that all organic material has been calcified into what for all intents and purposes is pseudo-rock at least, certainly shouldn't be able to be dipped in some lab solution and become dino jerky gristle again right??
Because they're not millions of years old, lol.
Glad to see this comment on the top of the list..😄😄😄
It looks like a knee bone from a cave man
Most likely a pig bone buried out back by senior staff.. to indoctrinate the next generation and swindle grant money from wealthy widows ..science has been infiltrated and corrupted ..like every other facet of human slave nation aka civilization
@@eddieo4808 Actually that's how the creationists have been doing it. Finding objects and refusing to have them properly validated and just claiming it's a real thing, and then using it as evidence to keep donations flowing in to support their cause. Kent Hovind, Carl Baugh, Ken Hamm would excellent examples for this way of operating. Make a claim, give unverifiable evidence, kick back and rake in the money from 'believers'. Scientists on the other hand submit their findings to the world at large, and those findings are open to scrutiny along with all evidence if that is possible in the situation. Either in the form of raw material or in test methodology usually. And the world's scientists work to find problems in their claims. If the claim cannot be debunked it gains acceptance until new info arrives, if ever, that might alter those claims. It's an ongoing thing and never ends. Religion though, make a claim, repeat it for decades with no real peer review allowed.
@@avi8r66 any creationist in academia ..would not have findings or theories publicised by the press or discussed in universities(rockefeller indoctrination institutes)
Maybe they are not millions of years old , maybe we are being lied to like every thing else.
Mudfossil University on TH-cam has the proof that we are all being lied too..
Yep!
@@jamesroberthyland1756 no
That man did an awesome job explaining everything thing. Thank you Sir
Easy - because we've lied about to about pretty much everything... and that goes for these giant dinosaurs as well.
Everything is a lie!!!
-sent from an Android device built on a pile of lies.
They don't exist it's Illuminati trap just like the round earth and evolution dinos are part of evolution
@@jholyroller6048 Yup... in order to keep you in fear (at any moment a black hole could gobble us up or an asteroid will wipe us out - therefore your life meaningless and it doesn't matter how you behave...)
Moritur malefactor et ad oras Acheruntis pervenit. Dicit infilici
Orcus, "Tria [lumina in regno meo sunt. In uno ex eis manebis ad
perpetuitatem. Licet tibi autem flumen designare in quo manebis.
veni ut flumina aspicias ante designatum. "
Orcum sequitur mortuus ad flumina. In primo, multi videntur
qui clamant, corpora quatientes. "Noll- in hoc flumen introire! Noli
introire! Flumen cera fervens! "In secunda, multi videntur qui
clamant, corpora quatientes. "Noli in hoc flumen introire! Noli
inttoire! Flumen nix conglacians frigore!"
In tertia, multi videntur qui murmurant, corpora minime quatientes.
"Quid est illud?" Orcum rogat malefactor. "Quid dicunt
illi?" "Flumen stercoris," inquit. "Dicunt illl- semper ·Noli undas
facere! Noll- undas facere!'
@@jholyroller6048 they showed some in this video
Thank you for sharing this. God bless you and all you do.
You are very welcome! We're glad you enjoyed this video!
I drill oil wells, we find the dino level , jurassic to cretaceous at 5000 to 2000 ft deep. there is no genetic material at that level, what we find we call rock !
Thousands of "dinosaur" bones have been found near the surface - if you are finding them at 5,000 to 2,000 ft deep, at what elevation are you when you begin drilling?
Oil is not dead dino's
@@WhirledPublishing he didn't say he was finding dinosaur fossils, but through the drilling process it is common to find fossils of various types. Mainly tiny marine organisms or plant material. The elevation you begin drilling at doesnt much matter, as its the type of rock and strata you're going through. I'm not a geologist but the reason elevation doesn't matter is becsuse there are many large ares all over the world at different elevations, but contain similarly aged strata, or periods where they seem to have never existed in that area.
@@nunyabisnass1141 When you become aware of the three most common ways that mountain elevations rise up, when various mountain elevations began rising up - and why - the rate of the increase in the mountain elevations - and why - and the forces involved in the rapid rise of mountain elevations, you'll realize why the elevations matter.
I've re-read your first comment a few times - when you refer to the "5000 to 2000 ft deep" as "the dino level, jurassic to cretaceous" having only "rock", you're saying your professional experience and exposure to these depths does not corroborate the published claims from ?paleontologists? ?
That's what you're saying?
If you can let me know the cities you're drilling in, I can look up the elevations. Thank you for your comment and your reply.
@@WhirledPublishing im sorry but i have no idea of what you just wrote.
Thank you Kevin for a great video.
thanks for not knowing that that aint no rock
Very interesting! Thanks!
The creation model doesn't claim that dinosaurs fossils are 6k years old. The model asserts that dinosaurs were preserved by Noah 4300 years ago and survived for some time after the flood event.
Ahh Noah! The worst incest story in the Bible. So, we all came from these people from the ark without genetic problems from inbreeding? Also how did they last 1 day in the ark without being killed from animal methane?
@@anthonysmith778 "Also how did they last 1 day in the ark without being killed from animal methane?" Windows, look them up.
"The worst incest story in the Bible." You don't know what "incest" is, let alone the bible. Noah had a wife and so did the 3 men with him. Let's talk shop atheist, don't YOU believe that you came from an ape, and before that a rat, and before that a worm and before that a germ and before that a magical puddle of mud? Very "scientific." You're devolved BTW; the rat, worm, germ and mud puddle all know and agree that there's no such thing as spontaneous generation, but YOU, the atheist, believe in it, don't you?
"So, we all came from these people from the ark without genetic problems from inbreeding?"
When your monkey forefather first stood upright and mated wasn't it engaged in incest and inbreeding... and beastiality to boot? Must have been. In your atheist, evolutionist model, incest, animal sex, child sex and like behaviors are simply "survival of the fittest." Sex with animals producing viable offspring "without genetic problems?" That's atheism in a nutshell, moral AND "scientific." Sounds like maybe you haven't thought this through at all. Ahh, the "moral," "scientific" atheist, perhaps an even greater hoax than evolution itself.
Lastly, "genetic problems," from inbreeding is a direct result of the precious "mutations over time" at the center of your oft debunked theory. The very cornerstone of atheist belief proves, yet again, that mutations , no matter how many years you give them, have no power to build life. Ultimately, mutations degrade and destroy a genome and ALL the life that depends on it. Add as many zeros as you want to the calendar, the problem only gets worse. Because Darwinism DEVOLVES and evolution is a hoax. But thanks for playing.
@@anthonysmith778- there were no mutations in that time. It wasn’t until the 15th century BC were the Israelites forbidden to marry close relatives. U need to do a bit more research.
@@masada2828 no mutations? Please define mutations. They happen all the time. If they were the only people in the world, it was absolutely incest
@@anthonysmith778yes, but what's your point? You don't know the genetic makeup they had. You don't know what the incidence of issues was with that at that time. The Bible tells us those people were living hundreds of years, some nearly a millenia. Something was clearly different.
This is stunning!!! Thank you!
@3:25 We know when that "sandstone" covered it and we know when the "prehistoric" creatures died all across North America because the cataclysm is documented in different languages by people more than 10,000 miles apart - and then corroborated in more languages by people that observed the destruction - these languages include Japanese, French, Russian, etc.
Observed what destruction?
@@jesussaves1875 The destruction across North America killed the "prehistoric" creatures and most of the humans living there - the public isn't told about this so the evidence comes as a shock but look at it this way:
In 1492, "Columbus sailed the ocean blue" and "discovered America" - he didn't discover America, he didn't set foot in America but that's the lie we were told... "Columbus proved the Earth was round" ... How does sailing from Spain to the Caribbean prove the Earth was round? That's another lie exposed ... ( keep going ) 1500's ... 1600's ... 1700's ... virtually no reports - and no "education" about North America except for the Mayflower, etc., in the early 1600's ... consider this lack of reports on "America" as the "royal families" seized control of Europe, Africa, the Middle East, India and the rest of Asia, as well as Latin America, and then in the early 1800's, "Australia".
King George of England - seized control of Australia - from Holland - by shipping more than 9,000 prisoners to stake their claim on "New Holland" which then became known as "Australia" ...
"World History" from the 1500's through the late 1700's and early 1800's doesn't tell us much about North America but we know Spain was staking their claim on the Philippines and most of Latin America, as England was staking their claim on much of the world... what are the reports from North America throughout the 1500's, 1600's and 1700's?
"Indians", some fur trappers and some "civilized people" colonizing eastern regions of North America ... ships sailed from dozens of countries, staking claims on dozens and dozens and dozens of regions across Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Russia, India, China, Peru, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Mexico, etc., etc., and yet what reports do we have from the "wild wild west" of North America from the 1500's, 1600's, 1700's and early 1800's?
Think about it.
"Ancient" people were mining gold, creating statues of gold, jewelry of gold, etc. - in Africa, the Middle East, India, etc., as billions and billions of dollars in gold in California and Alaska was untouched until the mid and late 1800's?
Because no one "discovered" the western regions of America until very late in our human history - even though Spanish ships were sailing between Mexico and the Philippines throughout the 1500's, 1600's, 1700's ... ?
Do your best to pause a bit to realize a colossal piece of "American" history is being withheld from us - then ask yourself why.
@@WhirledPublishing There is an even bigger asteroid (the biggest crater in the world) that hit Vredefort region in Africa - it melted the granite, which you can see flowed at a quarry site... if you look carefully you can see another partial crater in Madagascar - it is probably the reason Madagascar is not part of Africa anymore (it was not just one asteroid but many)
At the Bering Strait Russia and North America are separated by only 80km (with an island at the 40km mark) most "native" Americans share DNA with the Siberians and Chinese - have a look at Siberian native dress.
There are sites all over the world (including the famous melted stone stairs in Egypt) and burn marks (also vitrified stone) at many of the Megalithic building across the entire earth from Peru to Egypt, even India has evidence of an ancient nuclear event.
This I believe was before current creation because all these events (the Black mat and Iridium anomaly) and the sabre tooth cats etc all became extinct between 12800 and 14000 years ago. Too much evidence to ignore
@@jesussaves1875 Evidence: Since old stone buildings are also covered in melted rock - in numerous locations across our Earth - with no craters nearby - the theories of "melted granite in craters caused by asteroids" is exposed as more nonsense concocted by those seeking status and money rather than truth.
Please stop believing idiots - do decades of research, compile thousands of independent sources, and review the facts instead of believing "theories" from lunatics - no need to guess or speculate about the history of our Earth because it's all documented by our ancestors - theories are unnecessary - those that cling to theories are exposing themselves as lacking integrity.
To claim that "prehistoric" saber-tooth tigers lived thousands of years ago is not evidence - it's idiotic nonsense exposed by thousands of other independent sources.
Since melted rock comes from two historically-documented sources - by those who witnessed it - claims of "asteroid impacts" millions of years ago are also exposed as lunacy - do the research instead of believing people that make unsubstantiated claims.
The timeline for our Earth's continents, mountains, oceans and cataclysms is documented - it does not go back millions of years - it does not go back thousands and thousands of years - the timeline is shockingly short.
You're free to believe what you want but if you upload lies onto a public forum, someone who cares about the truth enough to do over 50 research of research and to compile thousands of independent sources is likely to object to the lies.
@@WhirledPublishing When an asteroid hits it causes an air burst and depending on it's trajectory - where it passes over sea the sea will boil... like I said, have a look at the molten granite at Vredefort...
Fascinating!
I have always had the feeling that the dating process was flawed.
It is SERIOUSLY flawed
Your feelings are false.
False again
@Tim C so it is no longer used by science?
@Tim C it matters because if it was debunked, then it wouldn't be used as a scientific dating method. The fact that it is still used as a reliable and accurate dating method and that you have no credible sources supporting your claim, shows that your biased opinion is irrelevant.
How can you explain the frozen mamoths? Were they frozen before or after the flood?
After
Probably before too
@@WhirledPublishing it would also explain the massive glacier's
@@NothingIsImposible09 Massive glaciers result from massive mountains which result from magma rising up in the cracks between the broken tectonic plates - this is one of the ways that we know we are not told about all the broken edges - because some of the mountain ranges are not documented with broken tectonic plates - for example, in Antarctica and in Greenland.
The timeline for the broken tectonic plates is documented in dozens and dozens of old records - the force that broke the tectonic plates - in the Mediterranean, in South Asia, along the Pacific Ring of Fire - which includes Antarctica - beneath the Himalayas, etc., is also documented: continental drift and continental collision are preposterous nonsense.
The timeline for the frozen mammoths - and the mass deaths of "prehistoric" animals and fossilized creatures, etc. - is also recorded by our ancestors - no need to look far because the age of our Earth - and the age of the Siberian lands in particular - is shockingly young - and it's all documented by our ancestors.
For example, Vedic texts tell us the Indus and Ganges Rivers also froze, and other reports from Europe give us the timeline for these extreme temperatures, while other evidence tells us "why" - no need to wonder about any of this - it's all documented by our ancestors - including the timeline for our Earth's expansion - which was shockingly recent - add the timeline for our continents, oceans, mountains, cataclysms, etc. - our ancestors documented it all - including the timeline for the Antarctic mountains, the Antarctic glaciers, the Antarctic ice shelves, the Antarctic volcanic eruptions, etc. - documentation from our ancestors also includes when and why Greenland - which was previously "green" - became a land of mountains and glaciers - I've told you into how this happens - you just need to know the force that breaks the tectonic plates - which is documented - so then you need to know "when" - which is also documented - repeatedly - in over a dozen different languages from all across our Earth - all of this was shockingly recent and we've been lied to about all of it.
Our mountains, continents and oceans are not millions and billions of years old - they're not thousands and thousands of years old - our continents, oceans and mountains are all SHOCKINGLY young - when you know the three major ways that mountains are formed, you will begin to realize how amazingly deceived we have been.
Vedic texts are also not thousands of years old - the original Hebrew texts are not thousands of years old - ancient Egypt is not thousands of years old - ancient Persia is not thousands of years old - ancient Greece is not thousands of years old - ancient Rome is not thousands of years old, ancient China is not thousands of years old ... the deception is conspicuous, devious, sinister, nefarious, diabolical, demonic and evil to the core - but few notice it - most are satisfied with clinging to the lies - of those who do notice, very few look beyond the web of lies to see the truth about our world - because they're programmed to believe it's not possible to know - which is part of the evil programming.
@@danmannz What is your evidence that the famine was "global"?
WONDERFUL
Amazing!
You find it because the bones are fraudulent and NOT millions of years old.
But how but
LOL SO OIL WAS CREATE IN ONE SECOND
I think I speak for everyone when asking... well what do dinosaur steaks taste like?
like chicken
@@oaw_manofnorse No, not at all. Emu and ostrich are nothing like chicken.
@@rnash999 Did I say anything like that?
@@oaw_manofnorse You said chicken and I am saying they would be more like ostrich, essentially a very lean red meat.
chicken
Everything you think you know is a lie. The only absolute truth is in God’s word.
That's a lie
@@an.d.m.a yes evolution is a big lie.
@@joseovallej2587 it's actually scientific fact backed by an overwhelming amount of evidence, but ok.
I think ,I know , I am here ,lies ,oh ,noooooo,who is typing this?
@@an.d.m.a Darwin himself wrestled with many doubts and problems in his own theory. Just on example of this is the eye. Darwin said to think the complexity of the eye emerged through natural selection was absurd, yet you claim this has all been proven out. So what is your explanation for this amount of complexity? What is your proof toward the beginnings of life? How do you reconcile the Cambrian explosion? Darwin’s Theory brilliantly accounts for animal adaptation, but origin of life???
Next question. Can you do the same with fossilized trees and plants?
And the mud fossils (i.e. those at fontainebleau rock forest - France) or the Nodosaur (Canada I think) that was so well preserved it is still whole (skin, flesh, bones and meal included)
Plants have skin, flesh and bones?
@@jonasa.3040 look up polystrate trees and also petrified trees - tiger's eye for example is petrified (fossilised) wood
This alone shows the evolution model is absolute nonsense
Hahahahahaha, how’s that? Hahahahahaha...
I was at one stage an ardent proponent of evolution. Science has changed my mind.
We have no idea how the molecules that compose living systems would of come together in a way that they could work in concert to for fill the simplest of biologys functions.
For Organic Chemists the parameters of temperature,pressure,solvents,light or none, pH, atmospheric gases or none, all have to be carefully controlled in order to build complex molecular structures. This cannot happen randomly.
We have learnt that mutations cannot be mechanisms for accuring change that results in macro evolution.
Plus the greatest enemy of evolution,that of time and decay.
We know so little. Science is the beginning of a long journey. It has barely dripped it's toe in the water and has an ocean to cross.
Someone once said, the beginning of knowledge is realising and admitting we know nothing and can not explain what we see.
The issues of the mind and consciousness and I would go on.........
We are finite beings and the numbers are so indeterminately great against us been the produce of happen stance and chance.
@@hansdemos6510 Do we have increasing information in biology? No. Never demonstrated. In every single test it has always been the opposite. Always. Yet, we have all the ardent "scientist" bangin' away(you) about macro evolution which has time and time again proven wrong.
For macro evolution to even PARTIALLY be scientific at all, only a small subset of increasing information via mRNA/DNA in any process has to be proven and yet in all cases... we are always shown less, not more as we understand that all that DNA RNA etc has to be shoved through complex 3D shapes in order to make proteins. It is not a 2d photo copier.
Stop running away by using lots of word smithing to grasp at the word "ardent" instead of science.
@@hansdemos6510 You claim to be logical yet cannot see how "information in biology' increasing, decreases or stays the same does not matter? Are you truly going to claim this? Is this where the world mocks you or treats you like a 6 year old?
You cannot have macro evolution without increased information. The Ecoli and fruit fly experiments which have 100,000's of generations have not increased information to evolve into higher species. Just more selected species with SMALLER sets of DNA/rMNA. That is not macro evolution, Hell, most would consider that DeEvolution. For you to prove evolution you MUST increase information.
@@hansdemos6510 Genius: appears you do not know what "RATE OF MUTATION" means. It certainly does not mean accumulated = more DNA. All it means is that the existing DNA in question was MORE rapidly mutating AKA DEGENERATING. Well duh, that is what happens when one adds in mutation of existing DNA, the organism can be optimized within its DNA range and then it completely falls apart.
No one rational cares what wikipedia says. Rather everyone who is rational cares about the actual outcome. Evolution as taught is the upward progression of ever more complex biological structures via mutation and survival of the fittest.... Wikipedia's definition is just bogus baloney. Why? Allele sampling of existing information, not its creation, to pop in the next generation is not evolution.
Brilliant..🙌🙌👍👍✌️✌️💙
How about the evidence for the animal kinds?
Let's say we want to know if sea turtles are the same kind as the Galapagos tortoises. First we look at the turtles which can still reproduce today.
And we find from those, that they each have a beak and specific nails. This shows they might be features which do not change. So, we look at the Galapagos tortoise, and it also has the same beak and nails. So, then we look at the sea turtle. It has the same beak and nails (even though it has skin covering most of the nails). This means the ancestors of the Galapagos tortoise, river turtles, tortoises, even the sea turtles, are biologically related. Their ancestors have reproduced together in the past. They are the same kind.
This shows creatures bare signature features which do not change. And by their signature features, we can identify their kind.
@@patldennis
There is a difference between commonly shared features, and signature features.
You wouldn't make two different cars and claim they're biologically related, because of commonly shared features.
Creatures are different. They have the ability to reproduce.
Therefore, in producing new offspring, signature features always remain the same.
Therefore, only the creatures sharing signature features are biologically related.
@@patldennis
To clarify signature features, it means a certain feature which does not change which makes that creature unique.
Two different creatures must share at least two of these if we are to scientifically conclude they are biologically related.
Like the molars and hooves of all cattle.
Or the front teeth and claws of all rodents, etc.
@@patldennis
Common features, are features shared throughout multiple kinds.
Signature features, are features shared throughout no more than one kind.
Features like venom pits and the jaw bones might be signature features, though it needs research.
@@patldennis
So with cattle and rodents, they share common features like the appearance of the hyrax and gopher, but only upon closer examination, do we see the rodent claws and rodent teeth do not match the hyrax, yet the cattle hooves and cattle molars do. Therefore, we know with assurity the hyrax has never been related to the rodent kind, but is biologically related to the cattle kind.
@@patldennis
A kind is a group of biologically related creatures.
Biologically related creatures must possess at least 2 signature features for them to scientifically be concluded to be biologically related.
A signature feature is one which makes a group of creatures unique and belongs to one group of creatures.
Once a kind is found, then comparisons with them and other creatures are made to identify the common features and to further identify signature features.
To find which creatures are not related and to find which other creatures are related.
The more these things are used, the more they're perfected.
For example, knowing goats and sheep possess the same skull and hooves, which neither rodents nor weasels share, we are able to make predictions of other creatures having the same skull as goats and sheep.
Deer, bison, gazelle, moose, antelope, camels, cows, and horses for example, all share the same skull when compared to rodents and weasels. Therefore I predict these all have hooves like the sheep and goat.
And after researching it, they all do.
Therefore, I have found a "Kind." Therefore all other commonalities that the rodents and weasels happen to share with the cattle, are common features, no different than a truck and a car having 4 wheels.
Why is this even an issue? Genesis is not a scientific textbook and was never intended to be one.
Only idiots take it literally
If there really is "soft tissue", then there is no way your sample can be "MILLIONS of years old"!
PERIOD !
Right on Robin
Incredible info. But did I miss something? This seems like the same video you posted once before.
Because they are not millions of years old 🤪👍✝️😇
@@curbroadshow yeah they are lol religious nutjobs who follow Abrahamic religions that are based in ripoffs from older religions
@@jasonjekyll8576 exactly that
@Tim C incorrect, Tim. Your religion isn't even the oldest one still in practice! Hinduism is! But also, Egyptian gods were dying and coming back 3 days later over 2000 years before the first "biblical writings" and the Sumerian myths are even older than that.
So this shows your level of knowledge about the subject lol
Yes they are.
How do they know its a Triceratops horn? What if it is a horn of some more recent animal?
They have drawings of them in books. And of course the Jurassic Park movies.
That's unlikely because even if made off the same materials, the structures are specific to species.
*Jurassic park theme song starts playing*
If you can be fooled about things going on in present time, just think how you can be deceived about things from a hundred, a thousand or more years ago.
I just love it when evolutionists get blocked by truth.
And what “ truth “ is this?
@@urbugnmetoday3183 The truth here confirms that the theory of evolution is incorrect. Nothing on earth just happened, it was made.
Why are most of these findings not buried much at all? After 60 millions of years I'd expect to find the fossils mostly buried deeply. In some places the fossils are almost stacked on top of one another, as if they died in mass during a catastrophe.
@@timothykeith1367 That's something I can't answer without further investigation. I'd love to have that knowledge myself.
@@grahamnash9794 and I can believe that but not in any man made religion way...
So, some tissue, under the right conditions, can survive for millions of years, or those tissues either aren't from a triceratops, or triceratops lived longer than previously thought.
@Pixy Wine I imagine it's either carbon dating or whatever strata they find the bones in.
What special conditions? Appears to originate from the same conditions as any other fossil. As well,, now they are finding soft tissue in fossils everywhere.
@@VaxtorTI've no idea. There are countless variables to consider. I gave three possible explanations for finding soft tissue from a fossil too old for that to be the case. Option 4 is that this is BS.
@@erso3302 Soft tissue was first found in a T-Rex bone.
The truth is that dinosaurs perished during the Biblical Flood.; which buried them rapidly with sediment. Hence the very reason we now have a fossil record.
@@VaxtorT Lol... no.
This alone destroys the trust in the alleged ages of fossils , this channel is a blessing🙌🏻💕
I don't think that the dating is the problem here. If soft tissue as we know doesn't generally survive past several tens of thousends of years (which we know it can in some VERY specific conditions as some ice age mummies are preserved with it) and definately doesn't survive past several hundreds of thousends or milions, it would imply that dinosaurs lived several hundreds of thousends years ago at best. And we know it's not true, because of dating methods including the ones that account for soft tissue but also other ones like the C14 carbon degradation method or simply because we know how geological processes work. So we can say for sure that the life on our planet dates several hundred milions of years.
That's why I think what is in play here is perhaps a process we do not know about that we haven't discovered yet. Further more it could be a process impossible for us to discover because to observe it we would have to literally keep observing a live fossilization process going on for milions of years and no human can live that long not even the entire humanity.
Wow this is incredible
Incredible means Unbelievable. And this ‘science’ is unbelievable.
@@Telcontarnz no it means difficult to believe not unbelievable
Do you ever wonder why you like people who are either lying or know so little about science? Wouldn't you reather rely on people who are smart and tell the truth?
@@ebkhuner not sure who you are responding to. Either way, if this video were true then Nobel prize awaits. And I’ll wait!
@@ebkhuner like who?
It's sad that most of this was discovered 20 years ago and is completely Disregard.
It and ignored in most schooling systems
There's that smell of cattle again it just don't seem to be able to get past it
Creationism = bovine excrement?
@@an.d.m.a yep
Close your mouth when you chew then.
@@scottytomlin705 your that sophisticated nice intelligent interesting sort of person who shows the world all that he is with his every word and comment. A true class act well trained in the ways of Twitter Facebook the Nordic people's have a word for people like you TROLL look into this they are soooo very Feel free to fill in the blank
I want to see what happens if the use that technique on a trilobite and see if anything is left in supposed Cambrian period like 500 million year old supposedly.
In Highschool back in the 70's I was very interested in Anthropologie. One day I asked the course instructor a simple question, Mr _________ how do you explain the evolution of the eye? He changed to all sorts of colors especially fire engine red. I was asked to go to my counselors office, change class, and I had to take a drop fail from his class.
I'm no evolutionist but there are explanations for most of these things
@@Scoobywoo7447 Like what... what evolved first... the eyes or the ears (not to mention - how did male and female evolve to meet at exactly the right time and place to procreate - I mean we know we all come from one woman - mitochondrial dna proves this... if she self -procreated explain the other 23 Chromosomes that complete the pairs - for example the XY pairing for males)
@@Scoobywoo7447 You need more faith to believe in evolution than in God... But those who wish that there is no God will get exactly what they wish for... an eternity devoid of God and all of His goodness!
@@jesussaves1875 I'm with you completely I'm a christian buddy I'm merely saying there are explanations
@@jesussaves1875 the explanations for things are plausible too I just dont get behind them as the time scale is way way way off they claim millions of years so they can use the lie of minute changes over extended time and yet in the 100 years (yes is far less than millions) we have yet to see one single mutation that benefits any creature from our studies of mould cultures for near on 200 years to the fruit fly experiment nothing changes on the macro scale
Who said they were ever fully extinct?
There’s no such thing as dinosaurs it’s dragons
@@patldennis I think dinosaurs is a concept used to explain dragons
@@patldennis no one is right we both have theories we don’t really know what the truth is
@@patldennis that’s what we’ve all been told to believe
@@patldennis I have and the dragon theory makes more sense to me
@@patldennis with the evidence of drawings and artifacts of the past prove you wrong, sir. Theres drawings of spots on the dragon's (dinodogs) that wasn't know until soft tissue of dragon skin was found, with spots on it. Do some research , good grief.
Without taking sides the one burning question which was neither asked nor answered is how often is soft tissue found in fossils. Is it a common occurrence or rare? Just curious.
They said at the beginning that it is found commonly in fossils.
It is common!
@@johanterblans8266 Thanks. I must have missed it. I’d like to see more examples. It’s a game changer. I’m a carbon dating skeptic.
It's cause they ain't that old 😂
Certainly not. Young earth clearly defined in the Bible, is a week during Creation. Creation week followed by a week of Mankind's rule, sixth day of Man's creation followed by Man's rule. Man sinned at the end of the seventh day, giving us Perfect 7000 years of the Garden + 6000 years of young earth, roughly. lucipher certainly fell prior and ruled the earth when Man was still in the Garden for a 1000 years.
Week (7000 yrs) of Mankind fallen from Grace state, corrected By God during the half or mid week point of the second week. Christ at Calvary.
The last day Sabbath is always a day of rest. We are approaching the 13'000 year mark of Creation. Corrupted earths date is not calculable, currently. We do not know when satan fell, we know the fallen angels fell after Man was created and seduced by lucifer though.
Scriptures' state the Watchers of the Heavens looked and saw the daughters of man were fair. This is post Garden, and post fallen Mankind.
@@abashedsanctimony154 You regurgitate a demonic deception as if it is divine because you are deceived. The bible never says God created Earth 6,000 years ago - you copy off someone else's work instead of doing your own and now you are exposed as a liar:
To take the timeline in the bible and overlay it onto the fake historical timeline where Julius Caesar, Cleopatra and the rest of the "ancient civilizations" existed thousands of years ago is to be deceived - you believe it is true because that is what you have been programmed to believe by satanic "scholars" that are propped up and paraded around by the pedovore overlords that control our world.
You are free to believe what you what but the timeline you believe in is deception - it is a psy-op - it is a fraud, a farce, a scam, a sham and intentional disinfo - do the research, study the evidence so you can see the evil with your own eyes - because as it stands, you are a liar. You should probably read what God has planned for "all liars".
@@WhirledPublishing It does, it states In Six days God created the Heavens and the earth. The Seventh He rested. Then sometime during Adams existence Adam fell. His would be week Two of Young earth Creation.
A day to God is as a thousand years.
@Tim C Possible, Remember that God created the Heavens and the Earth and All things.. but..Augustine's original teachings claim that angels had to be created within creation, and quite early to quote "Augustine places the creation of the angels on the first day (XI, 9) because they had to be created before the earth was created, and they populated the City of God. The angels were illuminated by the true light that created them, the light that St. John speaks of in the beginning of his Gospel"
They (Trinity) created the Earth and light, which if we are consistent, we would place angels either day *one* . With the light bearers, which Christ is the Sun and so are angels which reflect his nature or day four.
Gen 1:14 And God said, “Let there be *lights* in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, 15 and let them be *lights* in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.” And it was so. 16 God made two great lights-the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the *stars* . 17 God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning-the fourth day."
And , if this is true, it is very possible Lucipher certainly fell directly after seeing all. That God had created. Which is where he began to realize he was the second pinnacle of Creation. If you see where I am going with this. It would be Man was first. Although to satan he thought very little of Man that communicated with God in a relationship. Lucipher also was given the world. So Man being in dominion over the earth. Lucipher over the heaven and the throne worship, felt vastly superior. it is actually satan that fell and waited to figure out Adam and Eves weakness. This was not a short duration. Adam had a long relationship with God and over all the animals of the earth's surface having named them all after seeing their nature, function etc.
@Tim C People want to emotionally create their own view of creation. If you realize this, you will realize God created Man on day Six, then rested. That is two thousand years because it states God rested and then looked and saw lucipher was filled with darkness. lucipher had it for awhile. And God knew by the change in him, which caused many angels to begin to sway and lucipher no doubt would have been using his power to sway them.
Picture a kingdom and a rival in the parliament changing the minds of members of the house.
I do not agree with using philosophy, but Christ said lucipher has a kingdom and gods pantheism, occupy it. He is deceiving all into his own way. Christ is the Way, and holds the true Kingdom.
Either way, I saw this as literal. Because it's a literally true Book of history and spiritual events. I say it's close to 13000 years. And we love on a flat plane with a enclosed firmament that is separate from the upper heavens where there is a sea of glass. Certain false teachers keep claiming the sea of glass is a metaphor, yet nothing leaves this earth, through Jacobs ladder but God allows it.
Blessings in Christ.
No genisis is not history its a story created by humans that had no understanding of the world they lived in
No humans that have no understanding of God make up things for their viewpoint becoz they cannot take the truth that God created this universe and you in particular- you don’t want to hear that we are all fallen humans thru Adam and eves rebellion-‘The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? Jeremiah 17:9-we are all sinners in need of a Savior-therefore God provided Jesus to ‘once and for all’ take all our sin and pay the price it-Have you u even read genesis? Ask yourself what sin you think is worth ending up in hell for-hate, lying, abortion, lust......
@@jeanniestanley7728 I have read the bible and the more i read it the more i realized it was full of crap. Adam and eve are nothing more than a story evolution proves that .
@Tim C LOL that is so laughable 2 angelical christian scientists say they found the resting place of the ark. yet hundreds of real scientists have visited the area and find no wood no nails NOTHING. Good luck with your delusion .
If the universe is a simulation it make perfect sense that you could find dna if the creator wanted you to find it
So what good is what you've found? What can you do with it?
Clone me a heard of dinosaurs and open hunting season!!
6000 years old is also impossible. Soft tissue can't be more than 200 years old.
So, you think dinosaurs live in 1800s?
@@gctcauto No, I think people do not understand that a God that can create all space and time can tailor the progression of it all in any manner he pleases.
Also, nowhere in the bible will you find a 6,000 year old earth claim. Such idiocy is ascribed by man.
Kill a rabbit, throw it in the field, come back 2 years later and tell me how much soft tissue you can recover.
@@FelonyVideos So, scientific can not work because God can Manipulate anything anyway at any time meaning there is no stability.
Also, for your rabbit to become a fossil you need to bury Immediately after it dies.
@@gctcauto Are you, by any chance, Kathy Neusom?
I didn't say anything of the sort.
You're just making assumption after assumption. In the end, you'll give up on one or the other, the bible or science. I'm a man of both science and God. I do not require the two to explain everything, or to even be consistent with one another. Mankind went hundreds of years thinking F=m*a. While a fantastic discovery, and very useful for understanding, we now know that it is not a law, and only approximates reality in a limited subset of regimes of velocity.
Likewise, I am OK with radio dating, even though it too may be limited to certain regimes, unless a correction factor is discovered.
Also likewise, I do not embrace those who purport to estimate ages and times based upon a sequential reading of the old testament.
And, no, I do not believe that time has always passed at the rate that we presently perceive. There is nothing in science, or the bible, that suggests otherwise. There is not even anything in science that proves that time even exists at all. Think about that!
You see, one assumption after another leads us to incorrect conclusions. I don't have all the answers, but then, neither does anyone else!
@@FelonyVideos You said and I quote. "That a God can create all space and time can tailor the progression of it all in any manner he pleases. That literally makes science useless, because God can do anything and make anything look any way.
You CAN NOT have a God that can Manipulate reality in any way he wants at any time and be able to discover things that are constant or true about the universe because nothing is constant about the universe.
I knew it ! people rode dinosaurs and dragged megalithic stones about using sauropods :)
People didn't exist when dinosaurs did.
The Flintstones was not a documentary as Tim seems to think
@Tim C and we dismiss the bible in reality because fiction isn't real...
@Tim C bible is demonstrably false, but hey, people think star trek is real too... There's plenty of people who think fiction is real... Bible is just old fiction.
*EVOLUTION NEVER HAPPENED* 🦖
Evolution occurs within the lifespan of the creature and from one generation to the next - millions of years is a hoax, a psy-op, deception, intentional disinfo, etc.
So age is the factor ?
“Even if someone rose from the dead they wouldn’t believe.” Its a gift from the Holy Spirit.
What about the geological processes that fossiizes matter? That alone takes millions of years. I'm not saying they're wrong, I just think that we as a species do not have a full understanding of how time works. It seems every discovery only leads to more questions.
Fossilization does not take millions of years. Depends on many variables. Size, amount of pressure from sediment that buries it, etc. we have found fossilized dogs from 100 years ago
Amazing video guys to bad you can't get it to some science teachers.
they did, the teachers laughed at them
Many teachers are Marxists unbelievers
@@leewest8159 you mean "rational" I think
Why? They will not teach it
@@robertlandin40 probably true but I choose not to give up. Check out Bryan Nickel YT channel and watch his 6 part videos on the flood. You can't argue intelligently with his proofs and science.
So the soft tissue was inside of tissue that was fossilized or a rock so did that preserve it? Could the fossilization have happened quicker than scientist thought possible could soft tissue survive inside fossils?
Fossilized anything is the absorbation af calcium through the entire specimen. Nothing would be available to "survive" this process by definition of whst fossilization is.
@@gregfrench1254 so what is the explanation?
Awesome! God is revealing the Truth.
Amen
No. Your magic sky fairy didn’t do it.
All hail Odin, the one true god
@@jeroenemmelot3598 Then who did?
Seems like an all powerful being would be able to communicate in a more effective, less subject to interpretation way, especially with creatures he created for the sole purpose of praising him.
@@avi8r66 nope, just an old book of magic
On another subject. Can we make clones with Dino DNA?
If you ever find some let me know.
@@nunyabisnass1141 He is a fan of Jurassic park,it seems. .....
@@Irene-iu9sj ikr? This stuff isn't even funny. Like how is one able to shelter themslves so well that they can protect themslves from fragnents of reality that must pccasiobally slip in?
Almost every aspect of our lives is a lie.
Yes, we've been lied to all our lives but the truth is available to those who love truth.
Fascinating 🦕
That's a very good question, why? And now we know the answer, those bones are just thousands of years old, AND NOT millions.
The dinosaur bones are hundreds of years old - not thousands of years old - illustrations, statues, engravings, etc., tell us the true timeline for them - which corroborates the true timeline for the old literature from the Hebrews, the Greeks, the Hindus, etc.
@@WhirledPublishing *Fossilized* bones have to have been buried around the time of the flood, because a flood is one of the only explanations that can cause fossilization on a global scale. Bones don't typically fossilize at all. Though there may have been dinosaurs after the flood, it is very unlikely any of those bones were preserved.
It is the simplest explanation, but like the guy said, any answer that doesn't fit their worldview is thrown out. I once heard a quote from an evolutionist scientist say something like, "Evolution is impossible, but the alternative is unacceptable."
@@joegoodman8213 When you've studied Chemistry and Physics for decades - as I have - when you've studied Geological Formations, Wave Propagation and Cataclysms for decades - as I have - when you've become a Doctoral Scholar, an Expert Witness for the Court Judges and tested off the WAIS-R - as I have - when you've become multi-lingual and studied hundreds and hundreds of historic documents, written in over a dozen languages, going back over 600 years with reports going back to the early beginnings of our Earth - as I have - when you've studied the reports in the captain's logs from the sailing ships going back hundreds of years - as I have - when you've studied the reports in the diaries of the explorers - as I have - when you've studied the maps of the sonar images of the landslide debris on the seafloor that displaced massive volumes of seawater that launched colossal tsunami waves that decimated the lands and you correlate that destruction with the reports in the old documents to get the timeline for the top 10 cataclysms of all time, which includes the timeline for the broken and subducted tectonic plates, the timeline for the ocean trenches and archipelago islands, the timeline for our Earth's expansion, the timeline for Antarctica and Greenland, etc., when you've studied the history of illustrations, paintings, statuary, architecture, and the timeline for the megaliths, the timeline for music, linguistics and languages and the timeline for the advanced technologies, let's you and I sit down and have an intelligent conversation - now is not the time:
The "fossilized bones" across Europe, northern Asia, Africa, and North America were NOT "buried" at the time of the flood of Genesis, the Grand Canyon is also NOT the result of the flood of Genesis - the cause of those fossilized bones and the timeline for them is documented by numerous sources in the old historic records - please do the decades of research - which includes compiling thousands of independent sources, written in over a dozen languages - so you can see the evidence with your own eyes, rather than staking your claims on fictions and lies.
The "dinosaurs" lived AFTER the flood of Genesis - for hundreds of years AFTER the great flood - which was not thousands of years ago.
If you study the reports from thousands of sources, you will clearly see the true timeline and realize you are mistaken.
@@WhirledPublishing So what are you trying to say?
Only one conclusion. This poor thing died about a hundred years ago
Look up Dr Don Patton's videos.
Because the fossils are not millions of years old. Duh. The amount of soft tissue remaining suggests they are 16,000 years old.
I suggest you study some Science.
Start with Mary Schweitzer's discovery.
Millions of years old 🤣🤣🤣
1,000,000s times the earth has orbited the sun.
Paradigms? How do you change them if it makes you uncomfortable, especially if you've been teaching misinformation for many, many years
Evolutionists just can not bring themselves to give honor and praise to HIM who lives forever even when the evidence reveals The True and Living GOD Creator of heaven and earth. Their faith is being destroyed and they just say "so what". The day is at hand where their saying "whoops we didn't know" won't do them any good. YET even now GOD THE SAVIOR would show them mercy if they would repent and believe. Those who trust THE LORD will not be ashamed, AMEN ! I pity them. (Thanks guys & Please keep sharing your findings while they still can be shared).
Evolution is a fact. There is no evidence that any gods exist.
I also agree that evolution is a fact and there is no evidence that any god's exist. Even some theists know that evolution is a fact.
Evolution is NOT a fact. They have never found any transitional fossils. Any that they have claimed to be transitional fossils have turned out to be lies or a combination of ape and human bones.
Also, it's amazing how we can watch a video of dinosuar fossils having soft tissue in them and people still think that these fossils are millions of years old.
@@Keesha_Hardy of course evolution is fact. You can literally Google list of transitional fossils including apelike human ancestors.
@@Keesha_Hardy Every single fossil is a transitional fossil. Go win your Nobel prize dingus.
What about cross linking? How is that explained to happen? How long does it last ?
There's no cross linking in this specimen.
Holy wow. People still believe this garbage? It’s been explained and debunked so many times it honestly pretty funny that it still props up.
What's your explanation? I'm not a science expert or have any preconceived opinion, so keep it simple.
Q? Could the Calcium have "Sealed" and "protected" the tissue?
No they try to say the iron does. But they know it didn't.
Yeah, maybe it could after the iron preserved it.
Food for thought, this animal may have died with in the past thousand years, lending to another " what if " scenario, being this colossal creature might have only gone extinct not so long ago.
No dought ..that's a possibility
There is certainly unknowns in ..our story..but much deception..I know dino bones in museums are composed if chicken bones ..they say the originals are radio active from the meteor event😄
The whole concept if dinosaur s was dreamed up by one if these "elite" families rich kid science larper
I forget the details..they seem to have found some giant bones about the place however
@@eddieo4808 they must be some very big chickens! What about the fossilised dinosaur bones in this video?
@@an.d.m.a they are pulverized chicken bones formed into shape..look into museum dino bone composite
Absolutely possible, that this creature survived somehow, just as was stated in this very video. However, and this is the key point here, such soft tissue samples have been found the world over, from all manner of species, and in various conditions. This evidence has become quite common, not merely an anomaly, as has been stated in paper after paper.
It’s because the world is not millions or billions of years old ! It’s only 6000 years old since death/entropy conquered the creation. As far as how long were the days of creation and till Adam fell into disobedience no one nows and it’s completely irrelevant because the creation was free of entropy then. Time as we know it started when man fell into sin and death entered the creation.
When you send concrete to carbon 14 testing and get it formed billions of years ago.
Citations please. Or do you just believe it
@@anthonysmith778 If your too incompetent to research that on your own how is anyone to believe your capable of understanding it??
Even though evolutionary scientists cannot explain this, creation scientists are having a hard time of it also. How can tissue survive for even thousands of years exposed to the elements?
I believe the answer is that, being closer to the perfection of the original creation, even flesh was of a higher quality. Perhaps a closer examination of the tissue would yield some interesting results.
Creation Science is an oxymoron.
I hope you're aware that evolutionary scientists are biologists...
have you not watched or read anything about Mary Schweitzer?
@@sodaht2296 Poor you. Soon your eyes will be opened, if you survive.
@@The144Kth nothing intelligent to respond with I see...
Meaningless lol
@@sodaht2296 At this stage I really can’t bother. You’ll see soon enough. Just don’t take that vaccine, or you just might not be around to eat crow.
@@The144Kth I'm happy to hear you're not against vaccines at least.
Evolutionary scientists study In the field of biology just in case ya didn't know...
When imdead I'll be dead without a care
💖💕Next time someone asks you to prove that are text books are fiction and the bible is truth, just pull this up and sit back and enjoy the look on there faces. ✝️God is the creator. Period end of story. Genisis is History. 💖God bless you all
Prove it.
@@anthonysmith778 🤣💖God bless you.
@@anthonysmith778 prove what
You do realize that your book of “truth” is a collection of plagiarized stories, from civilizations 1000’s of years before the time of your so called savior don’t you? Noah’s flood story is taken from the story of Gilgamesh, why does your so called book of “truth” contradict itself repeatedly? Get a grip, it is just a book.
@@meademorgan6614 I pray that one day you will accept Jesus christ as your lord and savior so that I can see you in heaven. The world must be a lonely cold dark place believing that you are in it alone. Don't allow pagen stories to take away your free gift of salvation. It is your free gift all you have to do is take it💖 you must know this in your heart or you wouldn't be watching this on TH-cam to start with. God bless you my friend. I'm praying for you because I want you to be free and see just how amazing life is when your living it with God on your side. I want you to know that your not alone and that your creator loves you. I want you to feel that love so much that you are overflowing with it and it shows in all your actions. 💖💖✝️God is with us, and he is for you my dear friend. 💖
So is there any hope of finding DNA?
They have found remnants of DNA - but not enough (so they say) to process it
This Comment thread alone is proof that things dont evovle!
This should be worth a noble prize. Such detailed facts would stand up to peer review and really debunk the accepted view of science.
Of course, it’s rubbish and so isn’t.
It's called a "Nobel Prize".
The research where tissue was found inside fossils has been demonstrated and proved. No scientists disagree with the findings. They concede the findings. They simply interpret it to mean that biological proteins can live 75 million years! That's the debate.
It's not Nobel prize stuff dude. Nobel prize is not what you think it is lololol.
@@sliglusamelius8578 You correcting of my spelling error is the only useful thing in your comment.
@@Telcontarnz
Your comment is devoid of science.
Please explain the findings of proteins inside fossils previously believed to be 75 million years old. Thanks.
Mary Schweitzer did the original publication on these findings. So Michael Gaunt, your explanation?! Her findings are generally accepted. So let's hear how you explain away these facts. Come on mister Nobel Prize watcher, are dinosaur bone fossils 75 million years old with intact bone marrow soft tissue components still in there?!
Why is it rubbish, because it scares you?! Maybe your metaphysics are all wrong?! Maybe the universe did not create itself?! Spooky......
@@sliglusamelius8578 I dont claim to be a scientist...but I’m sure you will be able to point me to peer reviewed (not by young earth scientist, but real ones) that prose your point.
“Teeshue” .... Bless you!
Hopefully be hasn't got COVID.
Next question: can we begin establishing the genome of this Triceratops,? Is the DNA halfway intact, enough to begin building segments of it anyway?! Or is that too far away from a more robust protein like collagen?
@@patldennis It would seem too much to ask for I suppose but the presence of proteins is quite interesting. If that be so then perhaps enough sorting around in the material might come up with some substantial pieces one would think if not whole sequences.
@@patldennis sounds right , I haven’t really studied it at length, so much to learn, so little time!
The knowledge of a Creator is inherent in EVERY human ever born. Romans 1:20
@@curbroadshow Without a Creator, we are left with the Laws of Men...shifting sand. The Biblical concept of God and that we are accountable to him, is the only way we can find actual Truth.
@@curbroadshow So wow you have a lot of preconceived notions of Christianity that are not true. True Morality can only be found in Jesus.
@@curbroadshow Jesus is THE Truth.
Think of it this way...Man creates a Law...I don't like this Law...I think the Man that created this Law is a dork...I disobey this Law and kill the Man that made it...I create a new Law.
See...without the ultimate authority that is God, there is zero accountability in Man. Which is why this world is in the state it's in presently.
We as Americans have stopped honoring God and he will hold us accountable.
Romans 1:20
@@curbroadshow Book and verse please.
@@curbroadshow I think you made that crap up...tell me where it's found?
Please start teaching this in all grades in schools up to college
A tree in Alberta Canada was instantly petrified when a high voltage electric wire discharged onto the tree. Electric ⚡️ Universe proposes the earth was hit with some electric charges in a disruption of the planets orbits 😳.
The tree story names "Eric Milton" and seems to only exist on a couple of forums pushing the electric universe stuff. And it doesn't describe an instant change, instead it describes a long duration exposure to a high power line in contact with the freshly cut down tree stumps. Fossilization involves saturation of the tissue, whether tree or animal (usually bones), with minerals, so you kinda need the minerals on hand, or you need the right mix of stuff for the electricity to convert it into that new material. Regardless, this story seems to just be a forum based story someone probably made up.
@@avi8r66 it is difficult to find the story on it but I assure you it did happen as I live in the area. And that is specifically why I said it. What we are being told as ancient fossils and petrifications does have other explanations and the story was easily accessible back in the beginning of the internet...the cover up is real .🤔
@@missfriscowin3606 How does you living in the area equate to proof it happened? That doesn't even make sense. And one weird incident doesn't lead to 'the cover up is real'. Perhaps it did occur as you describe more or less, but it would still have a rational explanation and not 'prove' all fossils are formed in minutes and only recently.
@@avi8r66 you need to relax...I was just pointing out my OWN observation. Take it as you will but no need to bash my comments with your BS claims it didn’t happen and oh this is wrong and that is righteous attitude. Lower you altitude aviator old man. 🤫
@@missfriscowin3606 Did you see this petrified stump and root system first hand? This is my point, you seem to believe 'this is said to have happened near me so it must be true'. This is not evidence for anything.
Now, if you can find a more authoritative source on it I would love to read it. Right now all I can find is some questionable forum posts from 2014.
If you are going to allow your world view to be influenced by information you should place a reasonably high bar on the quality of that information. That is all I ask. I don't care is a million people believe something, I want to know why they believe it. If that reason is good, it may have merit. Otherwise it's just gossip.
Atheists WAKE UP ALREADY
No Genesis is NOT history.
KEEP SEARCHING FOR TRUTH AND YOU WILL FIND YOUR CREATOR
💖🙏📖
I'm curious, does any creationist apologist actually have ANY evidence, at all, of how old they think the earth is, because just claiming someone else's figures are wrong, is not providing any evidence for any other claimed age of the earth, is it?
Reoccurent Nova buried them?
NO!
Marco Polo reports what he describes as "huge serpents". The descriptions given sound in many ways no different than descriptions given of the dinosaurs in the text books.
How about that "Book of JOB Chapter 41-42" on behemoths and leviathans?
Still trying to wrap my mind around “living in the belly of a whale”.
@@pauldavisschlichting3726 The Hebrew text of the book of Jonah never said anything about a whale.
There are cave drawings showing men riding dinosaurs!!
We creationist believe in God the creator. Evolutionist don't believe in God. It is a waste of time to debate each other. Choose which one you want or believe. One chooses that life does not end, just changes location. The evolutionists believe when you are dead you are dead and that's it. Don't hate each other, just agree to disagree and move on. Teach the two together and let the individual choose.
They find protein. Can they find dino DNA?
I've seen the movie... bad idea! ;-)
Can they try a Jurassic Park thing and bring back the thing. It would be difficult for the hard headed atheist scientist world to deny it then...
the Jurassic is still here, iguanas and eggs
Let’s see them grow a triceratops inside the womb of a rhino, (preferably one in DC)
Is there viable tissue for cloning??? Has this tissue been carbon dated or age determended in other ways?
No and no. Its not tissue, its protein and other organjc remnants, and theres not enough C14 left to get anything approaching an accurate reading.
@@nunyabisnass1141 I don't understand how you can say there is no tissue there when they literally showing it. Unless of course you are an anti realist.
@@annalourens9077 i can say it because i can read a dictionary.
Did they get Dna.
Does their DNA have a read about blood? They used old numerology incorporated to discover that blood might have coded message. But I want to know if blood too was having a similar value. Later or prior astrology had some inclusive wreckage or saving. My thought is as words for talk are formed...the coded idea too. So astrology too seemed to have a similar idea
They are lying ! No way has any soft tissue been found outside of Jurassic park !
Sorry dude, they aren't lying. Just ask any evolutionary biologist. All of them, every single one, will admit that dinosaur soft tissue has indeed been found.
although it's just organic residue that has been preserved for millions of years.
It’s a miracle that all that stuff can be found after 6,000 to 10,000 years.....
Finding it after 50 to 150 million years
😳..... would be like Ocean Front property in Kansas....
Dinosaur bones are not thousands of years old - they're hundreds of years old - we know this because it's document in the old records, in literature, in illustrations, in statues, engravings, etc. - the public is lied to about the timeline for geology, paleontology, glaciology, volcanology, etc. - the true timeline for all this is clearly documented with thousands of corroborating sources.
@@WhirledPublishing .... some could be
.... but most... like that horn they were showing at first .... are from the The Flood....
thousands and tens of thousands of fossils are piled up in huge beds...
@@thomasmyers9128 As a Doctoral Scholar who's been doing this research for over 50 years, I've compiled this evidence for decades: when and how the piles of dead "prehistoric" animals got there is documented in historic records - often with the exact date - as I mentioned - that's how we know it wasn't thousands of years ago.
@@WhirledPublishing ....
You should of published your evidence
10 years before Dr Mary Schweitzer accidentally found it.....
then you would of be well known....
instead of banging out your frustrations
on a keyboard to someone you don’t know.... 😳
Better Chance bringing the Dinosaurs?!