Cambridge Clarion ESV: Readability Review

Try it before you buy it. Take a look inside the Cambridge Clarion ESV and see it for yourself.
Independent review courtesy of:
Bible Readability Reviews
PO Box 2925
Issaquah, WA 98027 USA

[@carmennooner2027]

I have a weird condition that makes it difficult for my eyes to travel across long lines. Therefore, I require the double column format out of necessity. I have watched several Bible reviewers and as you correctly stated, not many spend much time on the "readability ", but also the "usability ". I'm a seventy something year old woman with issues that accompany old age, so perhaps you could include a minute or two talking about the weight and also how compatible the Bible is for note takers? I know that would make for longer videos, but as a senior citizen I sort of feel a little left out. I'm very grateful that there are so many channels that review Bibles now, and I get that not everyone will be 100% satisfied with any one channel. But since you asked, I just thought I would throw my request out there. Thank you for taking this approach. It's extremely helpful.

[@trevorhare9393]

Apart from TH-cam’s useless subtitles turning ‘page curl’ into ‘cage girl’ (!) this is an excellent review. I notice the text goes very close to the gutter which is a worry.

[@ac5aa]

Thanks for this. If you get the chance, while it will probably be very similar to this one, a view of the NIV Clarion would be helpful.

[@fishersofmen4727]

How does the paper and Goatskin compare to the PSQ?

[@moniqueanders563]

Thank you wish the KJV had headings .You really helped me .

[@moniqueanders563]

Still searching for the readability of a wide margin KJV with headings and red letters

[@jessegandy7361]

If they didn't have the references they could have used an even larger font and maybe a thinner bible 😪

[@timwilkins2008]

I thought the same thing. The NASB LP Compact from Lockman has 9 point and it is thinner.