What media outlets AREN’T saying is, the Los Angeles Innocence Project (LAIP) is “an organization who provides pro-bono investigative service and legal representation to Central/Southern California residents who were convicted of crimes *they* say they did not commit”. That is directly from their website. The LAIP is NOT part of the California Innocence Project, whom are the ones who ONLY get involved in a case where there is DNA, AND, a realistic chance someone has been wrongly convicted. They won’t touch this case. The LAIP is actually known for taking on indigent clients; Scott Peterson is out of funds & his previous Attorneys don’t work for free. This was an inevitable, not a “bombshell”. The news outlets who didn’t do their homework, prior to attempting to portray it any differently, are looking a bit foolish to those who did.
You would to if you were innocent, and the police held press conferences to say that you're the only suspect that they are looking at, while also putting your affair on blast by having the titty dancer you were screwing talk shit about you on national TV. He was harassed and was receiving death threats from far-reich psychos. Anyone else would have reacted the same as him. I bet you're the type who quips about other cases, "DNA doesn't lie," and yet, hear you are being a hypocrite.
Nancy Grace really interfered with this case up in the public eye. Granted he was a douchebag cheater, but he was convicted in the court of public appeal long before the court case. Dying his hair and running could just as likely been to escape the media.
@@steelhurricane4041 indeed, he went to see his Dad who lived in San Diego and play some golf in peace,..not to 'flee to Mexico' which would'nt work anyway... he wanted to get a little space from the hounding media all who knew what he looked like...
Yeah and admitting to going fishing where the body was found. Not the sharpest tool in the shed. But in the back of my mind I wonder if he is using his "bro" charm to influence/con someone in the Innocence Project. If there is anyone out there who has nothing to lose its a guy doing life.
Being a cheater and buying a boat, proves murder ??? Think about something why would he say he went fishing in the San Francisco Bay if that’s where they were gonna find her ?? Remember, the media read that the day before she was found they were not supposed to leak that !!! The prosecution prove one thing he’s not a nice person, not an ounce of evidence to convict him of murder ! Not an ounce !!
Lacy saw the boat. He's guilty of the affair and her body washed up a few miles from where he was fishing months later. Zero evidence that he killed her. When the police let Amber hold a press conference it was game over. You've never seen that before or after. Completely inappropriate and made him public enemy number 1.
@kathleenmccarthy8418 And the fact that he told Amber that Laci died when he met her (Amber.) Then a few months later Laci vanishes! Though the evidence in this case is mostly circumstantial, it all points to his involvement.
@@gigiarroyo3939 You think Scott was the first person to use that excuse ? That's not premeditation that's a bad husband. Scott was in F city. He would've told Amber anything. You can tell that by his reaction while Lacy was missing. Trying to keep it going under those circumstances showed he was thinking with the wrong head.
LOL. Like I'd ever express contriteness to that piece of work. You have no clue as to whether he is innocent or not. Nobody but Scott knows that. It's just your *opinion*.
He’s a POS for sure, but he wasn’t given a fair trial. If I was on the jury I wouldn’t have been able to give a guilty verdict, in good conscience. There’s no solid evidence he did it but there’s solid evidence/witness that saw her after he was already on his boat and witnesses that saw him on his boat and didn’t see anything that looked like a body on the little boat. He should at the very least, be given a new trial.
@@sophie8394 I don’t know their names off the top of my head lol but I believe there were 3 separate neighbors and a guy running at the park who all separately saw her and the dog. There was also 1 guy. I don’t remember if he was alone or not. Who saw him and waved to him at the boat dock. He said he didn’t see anything the boat when Scott left the dock and would have seen it because of how little the boat is. All witness have done interviews that they would testify and no one ever called them to go to court. The guy at the boat dock even said he called multiple times because he was due to leave to his another state or something and they said they didn’t need his testimony. My only point is that he didn’t receive a fair trial.
@@JT.11111 there is absolutely no witness who saw inside Scott's boat. That is a lie that Team Peterson has been telling for years. The reason the so-called witnesses weren't called to testify is bc they weren't credible and Scott's attorneys knew it.
Same. I watched the trail and while I do believe he did it, I too would not have been able to say guilty. Only circumstantial evidence = reasonable doubt.
Hahahah I knew back then he was innocent. He is just a slime ball and cheated on his pregnant wife so people just wanted to nail him but he is no killer
Hopefully this is the black pill it takes for people to finally realize that acquittal does not equal innocence. Like Scott Peterson, many of the men the innocence project have championed are evil men and guilty af but did unfortunately not receive a pristine trial.
Here's the thing he is 100% innocent, and it's very easy to prove if he killed her and released there dog why didn't the witnesses that watched him leave see him open the gate and release the dog? If the gate was already open when he was leaving why didn't the witnesses report that and why didn't one of the close the gate? Everyone in the neighborhood knew the dog got loose all the time. And if he came back and opened the gate minutes after he left why didn't his phone ping on the towers on his way back like they did when he returned home hours later? It's because he didn't let the dog loose and couldn't have been the one who left the gate open for the lady who supposedly put their dog back in their backyard minutes later to find? If it wasn't Scott which it obviously wasn't who else could've left the gate open? I'll tell you who the only other person who would've been there to open the gate...Laci ! Laci's the only one who could've left the gate open because there's no way Scott could've left it open because he was already gone and we know for a fact that he didn't return home until hours later. Laci leaving the gate open while she walked the dog actually fits the time line perfectly except for one little thing Karen Servas said she found their dog a put it in there back yard and closed the gate the was left open at 10:20 am but witnesses said they saw Laci walking her dog around 10:30 , Scott left around 10 am and the neighbors house across the street was burglarized around 10:33 am so so one of the time lines doesn't fit and that's Karen's time line how could she and found and put their dog back at 10:20 if Laci was seen walking her dog at 10:30? Could it be that the witnesses that seen Laci walking her dog are are lying? Or is it more likely that Karen is lying about putting there dog back at 10:20 could it be that Karen didn't actually put their dog back and only seen there dog return while taking the items she bought at the store and her phone into her house and didn't actually know the time she saw the dog return and perhaps after taking everything into her home she that went and closed their gate and saw the leash was muddy and the proceeded to lie to the police about what actually happened and what time it actually happened and used old receipts from earlier in the day to help solidify her lie so she would look like a a hero and a good neighbor. I 100% think Karen lied and that it's easy to prove she lied. Ps cell phones only ping on cellphone towers once unless you leave and come back to that tower.
It’s better to be found guilty then if more evidence arise to set you free you’ll be compensated. If found innocent unfortunately can’t retrial them due to double jeopardy
Con man still conning Did he dye his hair again Pretend to be his brother Go fishing on Christmas Wife and baby found in bay after boat trip Pepperidge farm remembers
All of you, people who convicted him without a trial long before the trial ! Tell me something why wouldn’t the judge allow the witnesses who corroborated the fact that Lacey confronted the burglars across the street long after Scott was gone why???? Why was a girl who is a victim of domestic violence allowed to be on the jury ??? That’s against the law the conviction should have been thrown out right there !! Then she was boasting about it to the media after the trial ! I’m not saying for sure, he didn’t do it what I am saying is the prosecution proved nothing in this country you are innocent, until proven, guilty beyond reasonable doubt, and there is plenty of doubt
So are you saying any woman who's been abused can't be on a jury? that would cut out almost half the women from jury pools between physical and sexual abuse. And that we can't be unbiased! SHAME ON YOU
Pretty insane if you think victims of domestic violence can't be on a jury. Women and men are victims of domestic violence. Domestic violence is not exactly rare. LOL
@@N8T1V3-5F don’t you dare try to make me out to be protecting men who abuse women OK but it does create bias do you know anything about the law if you don’t don’t talk
It's not strange at all that he would go back to the bay where he dumped her even as frigid cold it is to make the bodies are not floating back up or traces of dumping end up on the shoreline. Bay waters are turbulent and does that. Those other burglars presumably have no ties to boating in the bay. If they wanted to get rid of Laci's bodies, why would they take the trouble to drive nearly 100 miles/1.5 hrs drive to SF Bay where they have no boat or associations at all.. from Modesto? If you follow murders, the first thing criminals do is get rid of the body as fast as possible as inconspicuous as possible - by burial. The association with the SF Bay is firmly Peterson. We live in SF and people generally don't go out boating to fish in late December. They might go to the piers to fish, but not boating.
They would take the trouble to drive 100 miles to pin it on the fallguy husband , everybody knew the cops were looking for her there and already had convicted him in the public eye
That's what Jodi Arias said. There was a burglary. Scott Peterson is where he belongs. He should of got the death penalty. I hope and pray for Laci family that he needs ever walks free. That would be a travesty of justice. God bless Laci and Conor and her family 🙏
Sorry, but he's the killer!! Everything points to him. I really want to see this supposed new evidence. The Van thing was reported 20 years ago, and to my understanding, they checked the dna twice and found no link to laci homeboy lied to the police about his whereabouts and told his lover laci was missing almost two months before it actually happened shame on the innocence project for putting laci's family through this again #justiceforlaci
He may have committed the crime but the state did not present a case beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the crime. A person can not be convicted on hunch or because of personality flaws
Unless their PR firm explains that all publicity is good publicity and they are in need of attention to stay afloat. Then, bring out the sex tapes, audio recordings of shady deals, and outrageous claims of letting murderers loose.
I feel so bad for her family. This is disgusting.
This is wild. Usually the innocence project doesn’t take on someone’s case unless they really think there’s some evidence behind it. This is crazy
Why's this crazy? Maybe they have evidence as you indicated.
@@marylee8771 I always thought he did it
What media outlets AREN’T saying is, the Los Angeles Innocence Project (LAIP) is “an organization who provides pro-bono investigative service and legal representation to Central/Southern California residents who were convicted of crimes *they* say they did not commit”.
That is directly from their website.
The LAIP is NOT part of the California Innocence Project, whom are the ones who ONLY get involved in a case where there is DNA, AND, a realistic chance someone has been wrongly convicted.
They won’t touch this case.
The LAIP is actually known for taking on indigent clients; Scott Peterson is out of funds & his previous Attorneys don’t work for free. This was an inevitable, not a “bombshell”. The news outlets who didn’t do their homework, prior to attempting to portray it any differently, are looking a bit foolish to those who did.
Nope, just publicity
This is "The LA Innocence project", NOt the national chapter. Just a bunch of cali libs wanting the spotlight
Oh yeah cos innocent people dye their hair blonde and run away south to try and hide from the police.
He was incognito because of the press and the haters. Thugs in skirt and suits. Holier then thou.
Guilty till proven innocent mentality. Shameful.
You would to if you were innocent, and the police held press conferences to say that you're the only suspect that they are looking at, while also putting your affair on blast by having the titty dancer you were screwing talk shit about you on national TV. He was harassed and was receiving death threats from far-reich psychos. Anyone else would have reacted the same as him.
I bet you're the type who quips about other cases, "DNA doesn't lie," and yet, hear you are being a hypocrite.
He knew he had no chance of winning after what the media did to him , why not take a chance at preventing yourself from false imprisonment
Nancy Grace really interfered with this case up in the public eye. Granted he was a douchebag cheater, but he was convicted in the court of public appeal long before the court case. Dying his hair and running could just as likely been to escape the media.
@@steelhurricane4041 indeed, he went to see his Dad who lived in San Diego and play some golf in peace,..not to 'flee to Mexico' which would'nt work anyway... he wanted to get a little space from the hounding media all who knew what he looked like...
How is an innocence project be helping this monster?! What a joke.
Because he might actually be innocent. As in, he didn't do it. He was convicted on circumstantial evidence, only.
He killed her, Scott isn't going anywhere
Its LA, not the national one. And LA is a joke
@@carolinematusevich889 he is a monster.
@@carolinematusevich889 , most murders have circumstantial evidence according to a judge in ohio
How disheartening for Laci:s family
he is a monster...
You are wrong
@@Handy-j5o Your opinion.
gtfo man the innocence project really droppin the ball on this one.
Not at all, the DA played fast and lose with the rules of discovery.
Bizarre. What about the secret boat, the secret girlfriend, and the fact that Lacy’s body washed up on shore, was not dumped on the shore?
Yeah and admitting to going fishing where the body was found. Not the sharpest tool in the shed. But in the back of my mind I wonder if he is using his "bro" charm to influence/con someone in the Innocence Project. If there is anyone out there who has nothing to lose its a guy doing life.
Being a cheater and buying a boat, proves murder ??? Think about something why would he say he went fishing in the San Francisco Bay if that’s where they were gonna find her ?? Remember, the media read that the day before she was found they were not supposed to leak that !!! The prosecution prove one thing he’s not a nice person, not an ounce of evidence to convict him of murder ! Not an ounce !!
Lacy saw the boat. He's guilty of the affair and her body washed up a few miles from where he was fishing months later. Zero evidence that he killed her. When the police let Amber hold a press conference it was game over. You've never seen that before or after. Completely inappropriate and made him public enemy number 1.
@kathleenmccarthy8418 And the fact that he told Amber that Laci died when he met her (Amber.) Then a few months later Laci vanishes! Though the evidence in this case is mostly circumstantial, it all points to his involvement.
@@gigiarroyo3939 You think Scott was the first person to use that excuse ? That's not premeditation that's a bad husband. Scott was in F city. He would've told Amber anything. You can tell that by his reaction while Lacy was missing. Trying to keep it going under those circumstances showed he was thinking with the wrong head.
The truth will come out. Everyone needs to get ready to apologize. He is purely innocent.
😂😂😂
LOL. Like I'd ever express contriteness to that piece of work. You have no clue as to whether he is innocent or not. Nobody but Scott knows that. It's just your *opinion*.
@@lonelyheroine you can't prove anything either
This makes me sick
Sick why? Because you think he is innocent and got railroaded...OR...that he's really guilty and some potentially fluky evidence could get him off?
He's quilty
California priorities
Nah, I remember the facts. Super guilty.
Next to the entry "crocodile tears" put Scott Peterson's picture at 1:04.
Or 0:51
He’s a POS for sure, but he wasn’t given a fair trial. If I was on the jury I wouldn’t have been able to give a guilty verdict, in good conscience. There’s no solid evidence he did it but there’s solid evidence/witness that saw her after he was already on his boat and witnesses that saw him on his boat and didn’t see anything that looked like a body on the little boat. He should at the very least, be given a new trial.
So, where are these solid witnesses?
@@sophie8394 I don’t know their names off the top of my head lol but I believe there were 3 separate neighbors and a guy running at the park who all separately saw her and the dog. There was also 1 guy. I don’t remember if he was alone or not. Who saw him and waved to him at the boat dock. He said he didn’t see anything the boat when Scott left the dock and would have seen it because of how little the boat is. All witness have done interviews that they would testify and no one ever called them to go to court. The guy at the boat dock even said he called multiple times because he was due to leave to his another state or something and they said they didn’t need his testimony. My only point is that he didn’t receive a fair trial.
@@JT.11111 there is absolutely no witness who saw inside Scott's boat. That is a lie that Team Peterson has been telling for years.
The reason the so-called witnesses weren't called to testify is bc they weren't credible and Scott's attorneys knew it.
@@JT.11111none of that is true.
Same. I watched the trail and while I do believe he did it, I too would not have been able to say guilty. Only circumstantial evidence = reasonable doubt.
Hahahah I knew back then he was innocent. He is just a slime ball and cheated on his pregnant wife so people just wanted to nail him but he is no killer
Hopefully this is the black pill it takes for people to finally realize that acquittal does not equal innocence. Like Scott Peterson, many of the men the innocence project have championed are evil men and guilty af but did unfortunately not receive a pristine trial.
I'm highly skeptical but weirder things have happened.
Seriously? This country really has gone from law and order to the wild west !!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Or is it the opposite way....
@@Handy-j5o Not really.
@user .....Not Really Bud!
Dean Johnson is as good as they get
Here's the thing he is 100% innocent, and it's very easy to prove if he killed her and released there dog why didn't the witnesses that watched him leave see him open the gate and release the dog? If the gate was already open when he was leaving why didn't the witnesses report that and why didn't one of the close the gate? Everyone in the neighborhood knew the dog got loose all the time. And if he came back and opened the gate minutes after he left why didn't his phone ping on the towers on his way back like they did when he returned home hours later? It's because he didn't let the dog loose and couldn't have been the one who left the gate open for the lady who supposedly put their dog back in their backyard minutes later to find? If it wasn't Scott which it obviously wasn't who else could've left the gate open? I'll tell you who the only other person who would've been there to open the gate...Laci ! Laci's the only one who could've left the gate open because there's no way Scott could've left it open because he was already gone and we know for a fact that he didn't return home until hours later. Laci leaving the gate open while she walked the dog actually fits the time line perfectly except for one little thing Karen Servas said she found their dog a put it in there back yard and closed the gate the was left open at 10:20 am but witnesses said they saw Laci walking her dog around 10:30 , Scott left around 10 am and the neighbors house across the street was burglarized around 10:33 am so so one of the time lines doesn't fit and that's Karen's time line how could she and found and put their dog back at 10:20 if Laci was seen walking her dog at 10:30? Could it be that the witnesses that seen Laci walking her dog are are lying? Or is it more likely that Karen is lying about putting there dog back at 10:20 could it be that Karen didn't actually put their dog back and only seen there dog return while taking the items she bought at the store and her phone into her house and didn't actually know the time she saw the dog return and perhaps after taking everything into her home she that went and closed their gate and saw the leash was muddy and the proceeded to lie to the police about what actually happened and what time it actually happened and used old receipts from earlier in the day to help solidify her lie so she would look like a a hero and a good neighbor. I 100% think Karen lied and that it's easy to prove she lied. Ps cell phones only ping on cellphone towers once unless you leave and come back to that tower.
I hope they get to the real truth! RIP dear ones
It’s better to be found guilty then if more evidence arise to set you free you’ll be compensated. If found innocent unfortunately can’t retrial them due to double jeopardy
Con man still conning
Did he dye his hair again
Pretend to be his brother
Go fishing on Christmas
Wife and baby found in bay after boat trip
Pepperidge farm remembers
I guess you're gonna try and ignore the fact that lacy confronted criminals. Hello!
😂😂😂😂
@@ladockins6887 The Innocence Project doesn't just take any case. 😂🤣🤣🤣😇😀😂😀😆!
@@steelhurricane4041back up your claim that Laci confronted the burglars.
I'll wait 💅
@@steelhurricane4041 Laci didn't confront any criminals 🙄
All of you, people who convicted him without a trial long before the trial ! Tell me something why wouldn’t the judge allow the witnesses who corroborated the fact that Lacey confronted the burglars across the street long after Scott was gone why???? Why was a girl who is a victim of domestic violence allowed to be on the jury ??? That’s against the law the conviction should have been thrown out right there !! Then she was boasting about it to the media after the trial ! I’m not saying for sure, he didn’t do it what I am saying is the prosecution proved nothing in this country you are innocent, until proven, guilty beyond reasonable doubt, and there is plenty of doubt
So are you saying any woman who's been abused can't be on a jury? that would cut out almost half the women from jury pools between physical and sexual abuse.
And that we can't be unbiased! SHAME ON YOU
@@N8T1V3-5F Ikr! It's insane that that person thinks that any woman who experienced DV can't be on a jury ever.
Pretty insane if you think victims of domestic violence can't be on a jury. Women and men are victims of domestic violence. Domestic violence is not exactly rare. LOL
@@N8T1V3-5F no I’m not saying it the court of law does
@@N8T1V3-5F don’t you dare try to make me out to be protecting men who abuse women OK but it does create bias do you know anything about the law if you don’t don’t talk
How is it only woman out in these comments all calling this disgusting? Y’all weird
It's not strange at all that he would go back to the bay where he dumped her even as frigid cold it is to make the bodies are not floating back up or traces of dumping end up on the shoreline. Bay waters are turbulent and does that. Those other burglars presumably have no ties to boating in the bay. If they wanted to get rid of Laci's bodies, why would they take the trouble to drive nearly 100 miles/1.5 hrs drive to SF Bay where they have no boat or associations at all.. from Modesto? If you follow murders, the first thing criminals do is get rid of the body as fast as possible as inconspicuous as possible - by burial. The association with the SF Bay is firmly Peterson. We live in SF and people generally don't go out boating to fish in late December. They might go to the piers to fish, but not boating.
They would take the trouble to drive 100 miles to pin it on the fallguy husband , everybody knew the cops were looking for her there and already had convicted him in the public eye
Do you know how sketchy it would be to drive a dead body far away?!?!?
Disgusting.
That's what Jodi Arias said.
There was a burglary.
Scott Peterson is where he belongs.
He should of got the death penalty.
I hope and pray for Laci family that he needs ever walks free.
That would be a travesty of justice.
God bless Laci and Conor and her family 🙏
Right maybe they’ll say she’s innocent next!!! Lmao
@@heavenj7
My God
I sure hope not.
If Jodi Arias was to be set free..if another man did her wrong she would murder again.
I believe that 100%
The Supreme Court of California threw out the Death Penalty due to severe misconduct during the penalty phase.
He’s so guilty it’s not even funny
Waste of time.
Could he have hired hitmen? Either way there was never any sense of urgency or sorrow to look for his wife. Ever!
Sorry, but he's the killer!! Everything points to him. I really want to see this supposed new evidence. The Van thing was reported 20 years ago, and to my understanding, they checked the dna twice and found no link to laci homeboy lied to the police about his whereabouts and told his lover laci was missing almost two months before it actually happened shame on the innocence project for putting laci's family through this again #justiceforlaci
Woah, it looks like D. Chauvin brother
Eye force a different type of private knowledge
I guess I'm one of the few who always believed that he was innocent.
He should have been found not guilty at the very least
He may have committed the crime but the state did not present a case beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the crime. A person can not be convicted on hunch or because of personality flaws
They don't take on cases that don't have merit. Let all the evidence come out.
Yes they do
Unless their PR firm explains that all publicity is good publicity and they are in need of attention to stay afloat. Then, bring out the sex tapes, audio recordings of shady deals, and outrageous claims of letting murderers loose.
Oh but they do, he's not going anywhere. They are doing it for the publicity
#LadiesUp #TheInnocenceProject #BarryScheck #ScottPeterson
Door step bound...to shut it down!
Let's go, Youngbloods!
😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
There was a bias from a female juror. She called the unborn baby "little man".
OMG!!! He *must* be innocent then 😂
@@sophie8394 It doesn't mean he innocent, it just means the juror bypassed the evidence because her personal bias.
@@jordanking6939 sure 👌🥴
When this happened I was 15 and now I changed my mind. I think he’s innocent. A cheater and serial liar but not a murderer.
With maturity comes wisdom.
Same
INNOCENT!!!
GUILTY