Bolt Action FAQ and Errata, minor axis boost?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @Pioden-j9q
    @Pioden-j9q 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Still no Engineers for the Fins bloody bonkers.

    • @OTCaptainSean
      @OTCaptainSean 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fins are all gobbed up

  • @patsellsproperty
    @patsellsproperty 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    wow props to you for such a quick reaction video!

  • @deccabw
    @deccabw 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Happy and sad ,generic transport options included for all armies,not included Bazooka for Chinese and change to the stats of the KNIL Alvis armoured car ,one out of three ain’t bad 😊

  • @xr8rgreat
    @xr8rgreat 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The US flame Sherman’s got an update to do with stabilisers.

  • @OTCaptainSean
    @OTCaptainSean 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    surprised you skipped over the Tough Gut point reductions to Nembo/Folgore got 5pts reduction to their MG42 same with the Paracadutisti MG42 Team both are available to genic reinforced platoons. And the small cheese nerf to the Italians getting to stack stubborn on top of fanatics on the RSI officer and Spahtrupp all both are available to generic platoons also.
    So I think the Paracadutisti MG42 Team maybe is usable, A non fixed 3man MMG team with Stubborn, Forza D' Animo and Hitler's buzzsaw for 71pts.

  • @Mktjoan
    @Mktjoan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish they would also update the pdf version of the rule book and include all the FAQs. Then you could download the new version.

  • @jonpoor8753
    @jonpoor8753 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I sent an email urging the 222 change 2 weeks ago!

  • @matty6720
    @matty6720 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Bo can you elaborate as to why you want a version 3?
    I personally think the rules work great, little tweaks like this or campaign books for wackier stuff are ok. I played 40k 1st so maybe I just got sick of those rules always massively changing. I like that bolt action is a simple, logical, fair as possible rule set, and being this I don't think there is much room for change.
    Looking forwards to hearing your opinions

    • @boltactiontutorialsbybomor3846
      @boltactiontutorialsbybomor3846  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I actually agree Bolt Action 2 is a great rules set, but for one thing: fuzzy wording. rules for houses, area terrain... and so on... is not worded very clearly. THAT is what I would want in v3

    • @matty6720
      @matty6720 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fair enough, seems I assumed you were calling for something more radical.
      On the topic of change, would you like to see a reduction in points for lmg and mmg? I think it's a bit silly they aren't taken when they were important at the time. Ten say for an lmg would make it a choice between this or a rifleman.

    • @boltactiontutorialsbybomor3846
      @boltactiontutorialsbybomor3846  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes I compleetly agree a reduction to 10-12 points for an infantry LMG would make it viable and tactically interresting. the mmg-teams need to be around 35'ish points regular I think@@matty6720

  • @scalehistoryslc819
    @scalehistoryslc819 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If only Romanian cavalry could charge AND take the sdkfz 222 in a generic platoon...

    • @deccabw
      @deccabw 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have a look at my list on the boltaltaction site to see all the units that are missing from a Romanian Generic Platoon

    • @bazza1carter
      @bazza1carter 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The former would be useful. But I'd much prefer to see the R1 tankette as a generic option.

  • @donovangray7518
    @donovangray7518 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the new fiat is closed top