So your argument against MRLS would match my argument against the current Ghurka rules, they do exactly the same unless they face other ghurkas or lancers. They are actual Noob bashers. I find Ghurkas much more detrimental to my games than MRLS.
He always plays the best nation, spamming two of the best ("broken") units and the rest of his list is hyper optimised to requirements - and claims most of the time it is a 4 out of 5 list at best. 😂 Also in general and when it comes to his results, attributes wins mostly due to skill and downplays the influence of lists. I wonder why? (He had a real hard time buillding a 3 list for a challenge laid down - it was closer to 3.5 - and then failed the do as well as he claimed a player of his skill could - so I guess lists matter? But he explains it away by saying he actual did well and it could have been better if not opponents etc etc ) So good luck trying to convince him...I like and support his content. He is one of the best (top?) BA players overall and especially in terms of results with his Gurkhas (top). But he has strong subjective views and definitely has some confirmation bias when it comes to looking at the competitive state of BA / meta and his own approach and success (British Gurkha Stuart lists).
perfectly valid feeling... as is my dislike of MRL-spam. We all enjoy the game for different reasons and find different parts of it more or less to our liking. regards Bo
![[Live สด] การออกรางวัลสลากกินแบ่งรัฐบาล งวดวันที่ 16 พฤศจิกายน 2567](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wPd7VFfWHIA/mqdefault.jpg)
I thought this was competitive play. No holds barred, win at all costs gaming.
You will notice that I'm not arguing for banning anything. just explaining why I dislike a certain army-build
I am pretty sure the winner of Warzone Atlanta was triple platoon and triple MRL
I don’t know if it was triple platoon but I remember it had 3 MRLs and 2 BA-20s
Picked a pack of pickled pairings.
Hi Bo, could you make a video of a good noncompetative Chindit themed 1000 pts list?
I'll think about it... Noncompetitive, Themed AND good huh?!
@@boltactiontutorialsbybomor3846 If anyone knows how to assemble the Brits, it s you :)
I’d be very interested in a competitive chindit list as a US player
So your argument against MRLS would match my argument against the current Ghurka rules, they do exactly the same unless they face other ghurkas or lancers. They are actual Noob bashers. I find Ghurkas much more detrimental to my games than MRLS.
here here!
He always plays the best nation, spamming two of the best ("broken") units and the rest of his list is hyper optimised to requirements - and claims most of the time it is a 4 out of 5 list at best. 😂
Also in general and when it comes to his results, attributes wins mostly due to skill and downplays the influence of lists. I wonder why? (He had a real hard time buillding a 3 list for a challenge laid down - it was closer to 3.5 - and then failed the do as well as he claimed a player of his skill could - so I guess lists matter? But he explains it away by saying he actual did well and it could have been better if not opponents etc etc )
So good luck trying to convince him...I like and support his content. He is one of the best (top?) BA players overall and especially in terms of results with his Gurkhas (top).
But he has strong subjective views and definitely has some confirmation bias when it comes to looking at the competitive state of BA / meta and his own approach and success (British Gurkha Stuart lists).
as always, I would love for you to submit statistical evidence that prove your points, or that my assesments are off. regards Bo
perfectly valid feeling... as is my dislike of MRL-spam. We all enjoy the game for different reasons and find different parts of it more or less to our liking. regards Bo