Scary Technique to Hunt & Destroy Submarines from US Plane
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 เม.ย. 2024
- Welcome back to The Daily Aviation for a feature on the new US Navy anti-submarine aircraft and its important role in patrolling the world's oceans.
Voice, text and video editing belong to The Daily Aviation, any use of these content without permission is forbidden.
Don't forget to subscribe us on Facebook or Twitter.
/ dailyaviationarchive
/ dailymda
You have a question or you would like to send us footage. Send us a message.
![[FULL EP.12] "นีโน่ - สเตฟาน" 2 หรั่ง แหย่รังมดแดง | เฮ็ดอย่างเซียนหรั่ง | One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zLBmzfrx0u4/mqdefault.jpg)
I was a AW-2 in VP-4 , P-3C back in the 1970's...loved serving our country.
If you can disclose, what Soviet subs were the easiest to track?
When the video got to the REALLY Scary part - and you went BOO!!! That frightened the crap out of me!!!! Ooooohhhhh, Scary Scary...
This technique is not "scary". The personnel who undergo these exercises and perform these operations are not "scared".
Remember, we're dealing with civilians here.
A news video can be "graphic" ! 😮 ☆
For normies
@@fjb4932⁰
The P8 is one impressive aircraft. Those sonobuoys are amazing.
Sonobouys have been around since WW2.
You didn’t even mention the thousands of S2s ,H2+3, thousands of flight hours by P2Vs and P3s
Still don’t think the this replaces a P3C
Thanks y’all 🤙🏻🇺🇸
Vive la Russie et Vive Vladimir Poutine !!! La Russie est le plus vieil allié de la France. :)
@5:51 It's nice to see the union jack and RAF insignia on the flight suit. "Hands across the ocean. Not just the Atlantic, but all of them"
What's so new about Submarine Hunting with Airplanes? It was made in World War II. In addition, the Lockheed P-3A, P-3B and P-3C, both submarine fighter versions of the P3, built a total of 568 units.
Requiem for a Dream - Best Trailer Music Ever!Dozens of U.S. Military Helicopter, HIMARS and Equipment Arrive in Subic Bay, Philippines
I was ASW ground electronics support in 97-99 in Keflavik. We flew with UK and Dutch teams. Technology is so much better.
Is the oceans full of tens of thousands of used sonobuoys?????
Yes
A person could “walk” on the bottom of the sea from Greenland to Scotland stepping only on spent sonobuoys.
Hahahaha….thank you!!!
After a mth they turn into high protein fish food
Your aircraft are dropping enough buoys to the point where a man can walk from Greenland to Iceland to Scotland without getting his feet wet.
I had my last P-8 flight on April 18 a fantastic aircraft to be on and maintain.
Nope....nothing will top ASW/S&R in a P3C Orion....nothing.
@@ResolUloseR out with the old and in with the new...
The P8 should be escorted by fighter jets to prevent some incidents what happened on South China Seas. It also is supposed to have a self destructive device (or system) to prevent it fall into enemy hands.
They are most likely overwatched by AWACS planes, that could easily warn them, and vector in loitering CAP, (combat air patrol} fighters. Plus, to fall into enemy hands, they'd need to be downed over enemy land space, where they would never go. These aren't small time operations.
Bien Hecho Extraordinary 🇺🇲 United States Of América 🗽👉👍 Al Igual Que Ideal Para Poder Destruir Submarinos Rusos
Nao e atoa que e a maior potencia militar
Nope...NOTHING compares to ASW and just flying around this mortal coil on the best-kept secret in the US Navy: The P3C Orion. I have 6k hours on that glorious chariot...and i loved every single minute of it. Saw so much of the world through those bubble windows and did so many kick-(_*_) missions in it too. P8 has NO windows...and that sounds miserable.
There called sonabouys the carried and deployed by p-3 aircraft there listening devices for submarines vp-30 was the largest p-3 squadron during the cold War
I was an AX-2 when I got out. I was in VP-23 72-75.
So these are like bombers?????…not just intel collecting planes???
@@wattsmichaeledid you not watch the video? The plane carries torpedoes
@@wattsmichaele no there intelegence gathering planes they lay the sonabouys in a pattern then listen for the sub their hunting
Wasn’t vp30 the rag out of Jax?
P8 = B737 adapted for sea patrol as well as P3C Orion was a Lockheed Electra II adapted for the same purpose.
Half brother was in navy worked on anti submarine helicopters on Kennedy I think was down in Grenada so what ever carrier he went to work for pw now works on p8s
I was P3 Tacco MC, we chased the red team ( not ours) all over the North Atlantic and Med. T these folks don’t know what happens with 24 hour Prosecutions!!!
Being a novice about sonobuoys, why the difference between dropping a sonobuoy from the floor or the pneumatic tubes? How are they recovered?
I can answer half your question, they are not recovered. When done with their mission, they sink to the ocean floor
@@sdcoinshooter seems very expensive to me just like all the money wasted on useless gadgets
@@stanmans If you’re looking for an argument on that you won’t get it from me. I was a Navy ASW pilot for 12 years, helicopters, and I must have dropped 500 sonobuoys just in my missions.
L3Harris Sonobuoy Launching System: The large barrel-shaped device with a door for loading is the Sonobuoy Rotary Launch System (SRL) - a pneumatic powered launcher which holds ten “A”-sized sonobuoys with the capability of launching a buoy every three seconds. The small device in the 'floor' does the same job, but launches just one sonobuoy (SSL). These Sonobuoys have a 'salt water plug' which dissolves after a few hours, then the buoy fills with sea water & it sinks to the bottom & is no longer usable. They cost between $800 & $10k each & if you can come up with a reliable recovery method that gets them back to the airplane please contact DARPA or L3Harris.
@@stanmansNot money wasted if your $100M - $10B ship is protected from submarine attack. Running & maintaining the aircraft, crews & the cost of the training exercises involving hundreds of people & various craft makes the cost of sonobuoys completely irrelevant. Being unprepared costs a lot more.
The CIWS thought it was a civilian airliner at first.
I know when I was on my name at aircraft carry the submarine discovery. People told me it was still very hard to find submarines even with all the latest equipment.
How come no winglets on the military version of the 737?
Phew....I'm not the only thinking this. And that it's a 737 fitted for military service.
Arriba los estados unidos de América ahora mismo más fuerte que nunca
That sono system looks ratchet AF. Give me the exciting days of laying out a cold pattern with P1, P2 and P3...
Good USA
Out of the 8500 hours I flew as an aircrewman in the P-3c Orion. I only had a few moments being a little scared. 😊🫡🇺🇸
I did a shade over 1500... witnessed Saint Elmo's fireball undulate and crackle from front to back..then dissipate. Very cool to see.
,,elles sabem onde estão todos os submarinos que interessa controlar, assim que se mexem, são detectados.
In the 50s-60s I’d be scared to be in a sub with a bunch of diesel sniffing STOOFs over head
Bravo rusiaa
Yeah, they know where all the Ruzzie Nuclear subs are, there coordinates.
Why are engines not circular?????
The engines are round. The air intake nacelle is slightly oval to improve ground clearance on the runway.
Thank you. The engines look really low to ground but I’m ignorant on a lot of airplane info.
@@wattsmichaelelow slung engines on aircraft often have oval intakes - it reduces the amount of debris sucked into the engines from the runway. Bits of aircraft tyre for example. Higher engines are safer!
so after seeing all that specialized gear for the sonobuoys it seems they are simply chucked out of a hole in the floor! ok, low complexity means fewer goofs.
are there any blowout panels on the P-8?
i ask because that looks a whole lot like a 737. and in the case of a 737 that would be a hole lot like a 737.
I don’t understand what you’re trying to ask, the P-8 fuselage is based off the 737
The P-8 will have a range of depressurisation measures to protect the a/c & crew. Why do you care?
@@nightjarflying I’m convinced you’re an idiot
@@nightjarflying you’re a straight bot, talk like a normal person so I can actually understand what you’re trying to say
@@nightjarflying speak English
Secanggi apan pun alat perang nya kalau kita tidak punya cara taktik yg cukup cukupan dalam hadapi perang nya dengan cepat nya kita di hancurkan oleh musu kita di kalah kan cuma dlm wktu hitungan jam saja taktik itu di gunakan untuk memperbingungkan dlm lawan kita 10 kapal tak berawak tapi hitungan berjam 1 negara itu tak berdaya kapal itu. Terbang nya 10 meter saja dari tana. Itu penyerang dii kotaan di timbak kan bangunan sendiri dia timbak meledak tamba menghanguskan bgitu
Técnica aterradora? todo en la guerra es aterrador bobina
So, ho is it living out of diego garcia a few weeks a year hi hi hi
Un titre en français l'écriture en anglais ont ai pas capables comprendre ! 🥵😡👿
راح اشوف اب اوكرانيه
Even if not totally accurate, it's plausible.
Schwachsinniger Titel, hier ist nichts "gruselig".
A Boeing manufactured plane? Hope the wing stay on and the doors don’t blow out
Boeing on the civilian side has issues not the military side...
На исходной позиции
Este mensaje es falso...quien lo subió busca estafar a quien done dinero
Look his body unlike war planes.
Go to botton
So are you suggesting that the US Navy is responsible for most of the ocean’s pollution!!??
NUL
😂😂😂😂 ajá
🇺🇸🫡
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢🤮🤮🤮
Us Army👍
US Army doesn't have all the cool planes unfortunately. Bcoz its leader was too d*mb and/or softas* to let the other services bully them into surrendering its fixed-wing air arm.
Elon could do this for 1/10 the cost.
Maybe, but do you think that's what he would REALLY want to do?!?
@@markcollins2666 I’m half way through Isaacson’s book for the second time. The dude is so mercurial that anything is possible for him to take on.
Elon can't be trusted.