CSS will always be best CS in terms of physics interactions, But the Con of it was Playerbase didn't like the Over the top Physics which was too detailed but same time bad for visibility and competitive integrity. Thats why CSS was least popular than 1.6 and CSGO.....So valve was trying to follow 1.6 and CSGO rather than CSS.....CSS will be always be coolest CS to look at but worst in terms of competitive gameplay. It's just bittersweet
I agree 100%, the main thing I'm glad is that Valve is trying to please us players, the style of CS Souce is gloomy, maybe it repels the players, but I can definitely say that Valve knows what they are doing.
Most of the playerbase stayed on 1.6 because it was easier to run than the Source engine. Most people played public servers and didn't give a shit about competitive. CSS was more popular than 1.6 in terms of overall players when CSGO was released (Richard Lewis confirms this).
@@christiansmemefactory1513 Who's Richard Lewis ? Till 2012 all major Counter strike Pro Scene like ESP/CPL was playing 1.6. it was Counter strike's default pro scene before CSGO. 1.6 was much more popular till date. Even in steam we see 1.6 has more player than CSS. Again who is this Lewis guy ?
I think Valve sacrificed physics in CS2 to get maximum performance and stability If they brought back those features from CSS then the game wouldn't run at over 500 fps
Well, as I see it, valve is trying to add physics that will not interfere with the esports aspect, of course, if there are a lot of physics, it is unlikely that people will have a normal fps.
@@GameLight The argument is not right, normal fps with a l o t m o re physics, is easy to achieve... Esports is a big biz. However, they are trying to make the SHOOTERgame more CHILDfriendly. if you understand what I mean.
Modern day Valve since the release of CS:GO have become greedy bastards who won't do anything for the community if it's not going to make them big profits. With a tiny exception being Half-Life Alyx... Very similar to Rockstar who after the boom that GTA Online made in 2015 stopped caring about their community and kept and kept milking GTA Online to this very day. A rare exception being releasing Red Dead Redemption 2.
The actual Problem ppl had with CSS, was the Recoil of the weapons. It felt too easy to hit someone and HS tap. Also the Barrels that interrupted your movements. Ppl never had a problem with the ragdolls or details in it. Maybe it's hard for computers to perform well with CS 2 graphics containing all these details aswell.
A very nice thing that Valve could do to please *EVERY* player is to add something like two game modes. One would contain all the maps made to be "competetive" and the other containing the same maps but with physics and more details.
When filming this video, ❌ not even a single chicken 🐔 was harmed, except for the poor snowman ☃️. Edit: I've read a lot of comments, and I would like to say that you are a great community with many positive comments. Thank you! 😇
Some stuff would be cool in CS2. Like the fire extinguisher would be cool so map makers could strategically place them for use in competitive play. More water physics/interactions would also be cool without disturbing the competitiveness. And a bit more interactive things, like, I understand that you can't move chairs and bigger objects anymore, but shooting down paintings or having the bomb explosion actually explode something would be nice. Bring more life to the game, but without ruining the fps and competitiveness ofc, but I think it's doable with source 2.
It would be really interesting to see some aspects of CS: Source in CS2. I don't think it would be difficult for map developers to add features to the game, such as sirens in Nuke. I've noticed that the developers pay great attention to detail and try to implement interesting features, but sometimes they prioritize esports over player feedback.
Counter-Strike: Source - Simplicity and Comfort are at the forefront. Counter-Strike 2 - You need some very bright gaming sunglasses in the desert heat. And it looks very animated cartoon. Note: Thank you for you.
19 años de diferencia y el motor source sigue siendo igual de impresionante que en su momento, literal son el mismo juego solo que con una que otra mecanica diferente y texturas mas realistas y aun asi la diferencia de detalles es mucha, y eso que el source valve lo saco unicamente para probar el motor.
CS2 isn't that competetive, I mean if the rumours are true about the "Noob Friendly"-ness if the game it won't be that competetive, even tho I would hate it because we have shitty details and a game where silvers can noscope smoke flashbang wallbang my entire team
This is a good demonstration of the tradeoff games (not just CS) have seen in the last decade or two where, because so much time and effort has to go into making environments so detailed and ornate, not as much effort ends up going into extra interactive features/touches. Generating and detailing environments was obviously less hassle and probably a lot more fun back in the 90's and early 2000's, which allowed for more creativity and less burnout, allowing for such features, because it was literally just a matter of "eh, why not, won't take long". Nowadays, of course, generating game environments probably comes across as a daunting task fueled by high expectations, higher ups breathing down the developer's necks, and tight deadlines. As a result, no one has the time, energy, or interest in adding those sorts of features anymore.
For other games yes but that's not the reason for counter strike games because these features get in the way of a competitive aspect of the game that's why it's best not to meddle with
It is well known that the physics were stripped down after CSS for competitive integrity. It is all well and good if a rogue barrel is all it takes to block off a sight line or a nade throw in some chaotic casual game, but this is an eSport. Sports and messy inconsistent variables don't gel well together.
@@Cooperal Fun fact: Physics are not the only form of interactivity and are not exclusively what I was referring to, nor were they the only thing featured in the video. They're also not the only things in existence. Hope this helps!
Honestly i don't see why valve would not add physics interractions like we were shown in HL:A. CS:S has the amount of physics interractions HL2 has, so why not do the same thing for CS2?
CS2 has a competitive focus, too many variables players need to account for would overwhelm the gameplay, that is why css is the least popular, because cs was always and will always be a precise competition based game
CS2 still in beta, so we can have more improvements over the next years... i hope for it... but the CSS physics was cool, i remember playing css in office and we always using a grande to make the lockers fall and blocking the ways for the CT's have trouble getting the hostages away... was funny and help the Tr's ..
I feel like this is less of an upgrade from Source to Source 2, vs 1.6 to source was. Games are at such a high level that improvements are becoming less, and less.
Tbh i think cs source is the best cs,the details and map the darkness,it still like very nostalgia but new style and tbh css bhops are literally the best and the stable,and actually the water physic u go and check the inferno one not nuke,i admit that cs2 water style is much cooler then css.
Не сказал бы что это баг, очень трудно двинуть эти автоматы, мне понадобилось куча гранат и времени, что бы сдвинуть. Может быть исправят, а так прикольно :) (Translated)
Это недопустимо, нужно меньше интерактива. Вообще стекла тоже не должны биться, это же мещает кибер котлетам. Следы от огня и дыма тоже убрать. Это мешает поле зрением
@@lorddemon7336 Это непредусмотренная вещь, свет который они якобы излучают остается на своём месте. Просто сам автомат, как проп, это prop_physic, физический подвижный пропы. Есть и статичные prop_static, просто физические нельзя разместить в ксго как статический, их размешают как физический и отключают их физику. Тут либо физику забыли отключить, либо в кс2 ещё не сделали то чтобы физические пропы могли быть с отключенной физикой при импорте карты из ксго
Maybe I'm wrong, but many people think that the physics of the game is not suitable for e-sports, because the objects are moving and can block the road, and you can hide the bomb under the objects.
It's kinda unfair to compare the two. CSS was meant to be a tech demo for the Source engine while CS2 was made to replace CS:GO's aging codebase and correct its fundamental flaws.
The fire extinguisher thing seems striking to me. On another very famous channel, it shows that the fire extinguisher is left with the bullet holes and not here. Which of the two is lying? I am inclined to think that you are lying.
Why should I lie at all? Just because another channel is popular, it doesn't mean everything is fair. If you shoot at an angle, smoke will still come out of the fire extinguisher from one side. I have both CS2 and CS Source, the latest versions of the game. It's better if you check it out yourself, my friend. Then you'll understand
@@GameLightI'm talking about the 3D bullet holes. In the 3kliksphilip video you can see that the fire extinguisher has bullet holes and in this one they are not. I am missing something.
cs source underrated game
Unfortunately it's true
CSS will always be best CS in terms of physics interactions, But the Con of it was Playerbase didn't like the Over the top Physics which was too detailed but same time bad for visibility and competitive integrity. Thats why CSS was least popular than 1.6 and CSGO.....So valve was trying to follow 1.6 and CSGO rather than CSS.....CSS will be always be coolest CS to look at but worst in terms of competitive gameplay. It's just bittersweet
I agree 100%, the main thing I'm glad is that Valve is trying to please us players, the style of CS Souce is gloomy, maybe it repels the players, but I can definitely say that Valve knows what they are doing.
I mean no one really played cs source for competitive. Most were in for Zombies Jailbreak surfing etc
Да
Most of the playerbase stayed on 1.6 because it was easier to run than the Source engine. Most people played public servers and didn't give a shit about competitive.
CSS was more popular than 1.6 in terms of overall players when CSGO was released (Richard Lewis confirms this).
@@christiansmemefactory1513
Who's Richard Lewis ? Till 2012 all major Counter strike Pro Scene like ESP/CPL was playing 1.6. it was Counter strike's default pro scene before CSGO.
1.6 was much more popular till date. Even in steam we see 1.6 has more player than CSS.
Again who is this Lewis guy ?
Physically
CS Source = GTA 4
CSGO = GTA 5
Never thought about it, you're right. 🤣🤣🤣
no, in CS GO (CS 2) you can also do it as in CSS, you have to do it in the map editor
CS2 = GTA 6?
@@NightWanderer. High possibility
who asked you budy?
I think Valve sacrificed physics in CS2 to get maximum performance and stability
If they brought back those features from CSS then the game wouldn't run at over 500 fps
Well, as I see it, valve is trying to add physics that will not interfere with the esports aspect, of course, if there are a lot of physics, it is unlikely that people will have a normal fps.
They took away physics because there is literally no need for physics in a competitive game
@@GameLight The argument is not right, normal fps with a l o t m o re physics, is easy to achieve... Esports is a big biz. However, they are trying to make the SHOOTERgame more CHILDfriendly. if you understand what I mean.
We have devices that should be good enough to run games on high fps even with a lot of small details and physics
BS, nowadays computers don't have problems with such calculation if computers back in 2004-2005 could do them.
CS:S = Physics Realism
CS2 = Better Graphics
CS:S + CS2 = Counter Strike Source 2 = Better graphics and realism
i want this! Valve please make this.
Sorry but that will not gonna happen though. 🙃🙃
CS: S is has a Physics Realism
CS 2 is has a bad Physic
GTA IV has a realistic physic
GTA V is so real but not real physic
Modern day Valve since the release of CS:GO have become greedy bastards who won't do anything for the community if it's not going to make them big profits. With a tiny exception being Half-Life Alyx...
Very similar to Rockstar who after the boom that GTA Online made in 2015 stopped caring about their community and kept and kept milking GTA Online to this very day. A rare exception being releasing Red Dead Redemption 2.
cs2 has a better physics engine it just doesn't utilize it
The actual Problem ppl had with CSS, was the Recoil of the weapons. It felt too easy to hit someone and HS tap.
Also the Barrels that interrupted your movements.
Ppl never had a problem with the ragdolls or details in it. Maybe it's hard for computers to perform well with CS 2 graphics containing all these details aswell.
I believe that CS 2 and CSGO are what we see because Valve has to adjust the game to support Esports competition more.
It's just shame that cs 1.6 was for competition and for fun. Now CSGO is just for competitions
esport nolifes always strip the fun out of any game.
A very nice thing that Valve could do to please *EVERY* player is to add something like two game modes. One would contain all the maps made to be "competetive" and the other containing the same maps but with physics and more details.
Yeah that s good but the fact is valve at this pt is just too lousy to do anything for players' good
Are there even people playing CSS?
@@Soldier-b7t yeah bro I do , it's sick
@@anuraganand5737 never played it
@@anuraganand5737 I really need to
4:31 Hostage are immortal, but he doesn't want to use force to get out of this place
0:38 This sound of alarm reminded me project IGI.Counter versions are also great.
cs source, was, still, and always will be the best cs game ever
cs source sucks
Competitive CS:Source sucks
When filming this video, ❌ not even a single chicken 🐔 was harmed, except for the poor snowman ☃️.
Edit: I've read a lot of comments, and I would like to say that you are a great community with many positive comments. Thank you! 😇
😊
hold up, the game is still in beta. maybe when it will be released, it will have the same particals?
@@Tulvaro I don't think so
Some stuff would be cool in CS2. Like the fire extinguisher would be cool so map makers could strategically place them for use in competitive play. More water physics/interactions would also be cool without disturbing the competitiveness. And a bit more interactive things, like, I understand that you can't move chairs and bigger objects anymore, but shooting down paintings or having the bomb explosion actually explode something would be nice. Bring more life to the game, but without ruining the fps and competitiveness ofc, but I think it's doable with source 2.
It would be really interesting to see some aspects of CS: Source in CS2. I don't think it would be difficult for map developers to add features to the game, such as sirens in Nuke. I've noticed that the developers pay great attention to detail and try to implement interesting features, but sometimes they prioritize esports over player feedback.
the game needs way more water and maybe some floating objects which could be used to jump across mid
Definitely possible. Fire extinguishers can be a one time smoke each round (with a smaller coverage area). Ecos and force buys will be interesting.
I am surprised the paintings can't be shot down. You can shoot down pretty much all of them on the new Inferno.
I still think it sucks that a lot of the cool details in CSS were removed for competitive viability
CS2 have great visual, yes. But there is no SOUL. Less ambient, less effects, less environement sound, less immersion...
I felt the same, now many esports games have maps without a soul
Counter-Strike: Source - Simplicity and Comfort are at the forefront.
Counter-Strike 2 - You need some very bright gaming sunglasses in the desert heat. And it looks very animated cartoon.
Note: Thank you for you.
CS2 is more like combining Team Fortress and CS GO into one game. You’re welcome, thanks for watching the video friend !
If cs2 just could make details and ragdolls and stuff enabled in single player only
While optimization in multiplayer
LIKE L4D2 VERSUS MODE
4:23 What the....
😁💣🤯
CS Source:Best physics
CS 2:Best Graphics
19 años de diferencia y el motor source sigue siendo igual de impresionante que en su momento, literal son el mismo juego solo que con una que otra mecanica diferente y texturas mas realistas y aun asi la diferencia de detalles es mucha, y eso que el source valve lo saco unicamente para probar el motor.
All I want is cs2 beta access in my life
I hope this summer they will give access, as promised
If it were possible for me to give keys 🔑 to all of y'all, I would gladly share them with a big smile 😄
I love every CS regardless of the physics or gameplay. I just love to play them
4:43 cool video but the window look like a bull or a cow lol
I subbed beacuse i dont know but is appreciated content that you make
CS:S wasn't so competetive this time so it could have many details
CS2 is competetive so they needed to delete much details to boost up optimalisation
Well, yes, in Danger Zone, even on the top PC, the game lost FPS sometimes even lags. (CSGO)
It's the stupidest excuse I've ever read in my life, making short cut games because they're more optimal hahaha
@@GameLight oh damn really?
Peoples problem with CSS was the recoil felt to easy and the movement felt like running on ice.
CS2 isn't that competetive, I mean if the rumours are true about the "Noob Friendly"-ness if the game it won't be that competetive, even tho I would hate it because we have shitty details and a game where silvers can noscope smoke flashbang wallbang my entire team
That hostage in CS2 is litterally superman 🙃
1:33, very cute🙂
Well, so much for the new Source engine. Not sure if these changes were worth replacing CS:GO, but that's just me.
I remember i used to stand on the c4 waiting for it to explode in CS:S. Just to see my character went flying. Good old days.
I’m not impressed, CSS was released in 2004, the same year as HL2, so both on those games got incredible physics potential.
and cs2 was released in 2024....
This is a good demonstration of the tradeoff games (not just CS) have seen in the last decade or two where, because so much time and effort has to go into making environments so detailed and ornate, not as much effort ends up going into extra interactive features/touches. Generating and detailing environments was obviously less hassle and probably a lot more fun back in the 90's and early 2000's, which allowed for more creativity and less burnout, allowing for such features, because it was literally just a matter of "eh, why not, won't take long".
Nowadays, of course, generating game environments probably comes across as a daunting task fueled by high expectations, higher ups breathing down the developer's necks, and tight deadlines. As a result, no one has the time, energy, or interest in adding those sorts of features anymore.
For other games yes but that's not the reason for counter strike games because these features get in the way of a competitive aspect of the game that's why it's best not to meddle with
It is well known that the physics were stripped down after CSS for competitive integrity. It is all well and good if a rogue barrel is all it takes to block off a sight line or a nade throw in some chaotic casual game, but this is an eSport. Sports and messy inconsistent variables don't gel well together.
@@Cooperal Fun fact: Physics are not the only form of interactivity and are not exclusively what I was referring to, nor were they the only thing featured in the video. They're also not the only things in existence. Hope this helps!
Honestly i don't see why valve would not add physics interractions like we were shown in HL:A. CS:S has the amount of physics interractions HL2 has, so why not do the same thing for CS2?
CS2 has a competitive focus, too many variables players need to account for would overwhelm the gameplay, that is why css is the least popular, because cs was always and will always be a precise competition based game
@@thekonfa CSS was not as popular because the recoil was too simpel and the movement very different.
1:17 nice backflip
7:26 cs:go?
Игра 2004 года в некоторотых игровых аспектах превосходит новичка
"no body was harmed in the making of this video"
CSS : For Fun
CsGo(or Cs2) : For competitive
1:13 1:39 мне стало жалко этих ребят(
Не забуду, как мы уби вали заложников в игре(ксс) и строили баррикады, чтоб кт не могли увести заложников и могли бы в перестрелке с терами поиграть.
3:33 он ушел прям как мой отец😭
😢
CS2 still in beta, so we can have more improvements over the next years... i hope for it... but the CSS physics was cool, i remember playing css in office and we always using a grande to make the lockers fall and blocking the ways for the CT's have trouble getting the hostages away... was funny and help the Tr's ..
I feel like this is less of an upgrade from Source to Source 2, vs 1.6 to source was. Games are at such a high level that improvements are becoming less, and less.
I would like to take CS 2 and add physics and stuff from CS Source there
7:27 cs go wth😂
👇People who think CS Source is the best
i aint giving You a damn thumbs up
Bro begging for likes
Counter Strike Source is still the best today.
4:23 me realized that hostage in cs2 and csgo is op
Me : 🗿
also my brain : 🗿
А как называется вот этот режим, где можно закладывать бомбу везде?
Не могу точно сказать о CS2, но в CS GO есть все фишки CSS просто их убрали для оптимизации игры
Полный бред потому что в CS:S с такой физикой фпс куда больше чем в CS:GO
Скорее всего они убрали физику и некоторые детали для более соревновательной игры
@@doomsday7697 посмотри, ролик депозита. Может, он поточнее расскажет.
Why valve not add the chicken?😢 only that animal i ever see in cs 1.6 and cs condition zero/deleted scene
Sad why cs source not add a chicken
Btw css have others animal too its fish, we can killed the fish like chicken if we shoot
Cs2 👶
Csgo 🐔
Css 😈
Cs 1.6🗿
Half life ☠️
Left for dead 🧟
@@GameLightQuake 🫥
Team Fortress 2 🧔♂
Good video
Thanks mate. Glad you enjoyed 👍
wtf that 1 hostage still alive even he trow some grenade
A nuclear bomb won't even help, I guarantee 😂
*REMINDER*
CS2 overpass and vertigo coming🎉🎉
Thank you friend, already in the process of shooting a short video.
valve cant add breakable table on office because it will dramatically ruin whole competitive experience... i guess
It will always be a win when the gun is pointing downwards...
Just saying...
7:51 i put the new fargies...
Damn thats why they want that much these hostages
i'm hoping this is only because is in beta, otherwise, this is absolutely embarrasing for a sequel we've been waiting literally a decade
2:05 did someone notice that? 🤭
7:03 - CS:GO?
Saying that a game is "competitive" is such a bad excuse to not add attention to detail
what is the command for front view thirdperson please?
Cs source was ones a legend game were we used to play bur cs2 is just not the same
You are defusing the kit without a bomb.
m4 reload animation in cs source made me die 💀
Tbh i think cs source is the best cs,the details and map the darkness,it still like very nostalgia but new style and tbh css bhops are literally the best and the stable,and actually the water physic u go and check the inferno one not nuke,i admit that cs2 water style is much cooler then css.
4:28 The anime villian
Cs:go, cs2 hostages have god powers
and unable to walk😏
То что тогровые автоматы в cs2 можно двигать это явно баг который исправят на релизе, даже их свет остается на своем месте
Не сказал бы что это баг, очень трудно двинуть эти автоматы, мне понадобилось куча гранат и времени, что бы сдвинуть. Может быть исправят, а так прикольно :) (Translated)
Это недопустимо, нужно меньше интерактива. Вообще стекла тоже не должны биться, это же мещает кибер котлетам. Следы от огня и дыма тоже убрать. Это мешает поле зрением
@@sawat3149чел, это нужно для оптимизации. Ты понимаешь что колизия очень сильно нагружает комп
Мне кажется это особенность карты
@@lorddemon7336 Это непредусмотренная вещь, свет который они якобы излучают остается на своём месте. Просто сам автомат, как проп, это prop_physic, физический подвижный пропы. Есть и статичные prop_static, просто физические нельзя разместить в ксго как статический, их размешают как физический и отключают их физику. Тут либо физику забыли отключить, либо в кс2 ещё не сделали то чтобы физические пропы могли быть с отключенной физикой при импорте карты из ксго
counter strike source the best 🥰
Can someone explain to me why CSS physics are bad for competitive play?
Maybe I'm wrong, but many people think that the physics of the game is not suitable for e-sports, because the objects are moving and can block the road, and you can hide the bomb under the objects.
@@GameLight well yeah but couldnt that be made meta?
@@GameLight why does everyone act like the comp servers didn't have scripts in place to remove these things LOL...
4:30 whaaat😅😅😅
Have u video from css beta?
No, the game is not updated of course, but I used the latest version of CS Source at the moment
@@GameLight I think it will be correct to compare the latest verion of both versions
This map Nuke?
why the counter strike source logo is a guy shooting his boot? and why in a moment cs:s was csgo?
CSS and his zombie servers with all addons on the server, G.O.A.T. Unfortunately, after an update from valve, many of theese servers are down now.
В торговые автоматы в CS:S можно положить деньги (деньги не вычитаются) и из них выпадут напитки
Yes
Отличная деталь, в видео я так и сделал, и за звука не было заметно, спасибо что написал (translated)
Cs source en iyi bu arada
Haklısın
Little Inferno music
Problem i have with cs2 is it looks so bright even indoors looks like there is no shadows , it looks more like COD and Valorant and less CS 😊
there were glass physics in cs go on xbox 360.
How to plant C4 in office?
Glass physics in css are way better but if there will be glass physics from hl 2 in will be even better
Most of CSS physics and details should be added back
How you use bomb in map hostage
4:35 bro still servive without die💀
If they combined the cs 2 and cs source we will get the best game at all
It's kinda unfair to compare the two. CSS was meant to be a tech demo for the Source engine while CS2 was made to replace CS:GO's aging codebase and correct its fundamental flaws.
The fire extinguisher thing seems striking to me. On another very famous channel, it shows that the fire extinguisher is left with the bullet holes and not here. Which of the two is lying? I am inclined to think that you are lying.
Why should I lie at all? Just because another channel is popular, it doesn't mean everything is fair. If you shoot at an angle, smoke will still come out of the fire extinguisher from one side. I have both CS2 and CS Source, the latest versions of the game. It's better if you check it out yourself, my friend. Then you'll understand
@@GameLightI'm talking about the 3D bullet holes. In the 3kliksphilip video you can see that the fire extinguisher has bullet holes and in this one they are not. I am missing something.
Games used to be better than they are now 😎👍
What css and cs2 usps r so similar
7:08 What's not clean here!
Apa kabar bang, asal mana kamu?
the reason why, i want play cs2 because the LEGS , finaly i can see my legs hahaha
😢 Everyone forgot cs source online no
I miss SWAT4 SO MUCH bros...
Inspite of performance down, I still want physics...
CSS still best
Ради киберспорта урезали все до тупой стрелялки, а было куча тактик
CSS WINS ANIMATIONS
I have to say that the C4 is very underwhelming in CS2.