so when venting to atmosphere the mixture becomes rich meaning not all of the fuel will be burnt dumping un-burnt fuel to the exhaust where if sufficiently heated may cause it to reignite.... AKA shooting dank ass flames
Carmicha3l it vents when throttle plate is closed and there is fuel cut off when throttle closes therefore not dumping much fuel with an atmosphere blow off, as explained in the video
If it is so unhealthy to run the engine rich then why do a lot of modified cars (including mine) run on decel ignition cut and not decel fuel cut? It didn't blow the turbo on the Subaru and it doesn't wreck your engine. Please provide me with facts towards your argument.
The answer is yes. I recommend getting a GFB TMS respons hybrid BOV so that way you can vent whatever percentage you want and won't trigger a check engine light
I'm liking this new series and how technical it is. As mentioned in the video, it's good to get a professional opinion that isn't some bloke on a forum site.
That 2 port blow off value was the best item I purchased for my rexy. Made the best sounds, and when I got pulled over, I just quickly turned it to 100% recirculation and got away defect free :)
@@moto324 i have a proceed GT and haven't noticed my car to backfire any more than it already does. I have it half open, and i keep myscrew driver handy, in case I need to adjust mine, as it has a manual adjustment lever, not fancy remote control haha. The GFB DVX is what I have.
fun fact, Brett means Wide in Swedish, so go fast Brett in Swenglish translates to Go fast Wide, as in when you drift. or "åka på tvären" as we say here. great series btw
You mean speed density off of your MAP. I have a Speed 3 and we have MAFs and MAPs. But our air is metered at the MAF, so we end up venting metered air, getting idle bounce, afterfires, etc., esp if you're venting too much. If you vent just a little, you're usually okay.
Some people's MAF and IAT are sort of spilt up, you can move your IAT right before your manifold after the BOV. Then delete the MAF with a MAP based tuned. Obviously only can do this if you have a MAP sensor on the intake somewhere. Boom problem solved.
Awesome video guys, love that you are helping to clarify issues you've found on the internet with people that actually know what they are talking about!! I was just wondering if you could clarify how you would go about determining the correct spring tension for your b.o.v in order to not cause stalling or backfiring. I.e how do you go about setting it up correctly ?? Cheers And love the videos !!
Good video I found it was just easy to move the maff after the blow off valve that way the air that is being discharged never passes threw the mass air but yes most GM that I tune have DFCO deceleration fuel cut off as soon as your foot leaves the pedal your AFR is flat lined shutting off fuel. When tuning even in open loop with DFCO disabled still don’t see rich conditions even if so a little extra fuel will keep them cylinders cool lol thanks for the info brother God Bless
i'd like to see a follow up of this covering the differences between EFI systems using MAP sensors instead of MAF sensors and also Blow through Carby setups.
Intestine video! On the turbo system that's on my Focus, the blow off valve is before the MAF so it makes no difference to idle or AFR when I vent to atmosphere. I'm also using an OEM diverter valve off of an Audi, and seems to work just fine as well. But of course, I specifically designed the system to have all of the venting stuff before the MAF so I could avoid all of these problems. But I don't know if most OEM turbo systems work that way, so probably trust Brett ;)
What I've always been told is that it might gunk up your first catalyser. That's it. The unburnt fuel will just gunk it up over a (very) lengthy period of time, after which you either change it or just cancel it lol. I prefer keeping them as I'm not a fan of smelly cars, and they are a few hundred bucks I beleive, but yeah if you go with a 50-50 valve... You should be fine. I had one on my '04 WRX, and even tho subarus are reputed to not liking BOVs too much, with th 50-50 one, I had it on the car for 3 years and everything was still perfectly good.
Newer into the car scene & just grabbed a GFB TMS for my WRX. 50/50 was my plan anyways based off of still having air recirculating and still getting the atmospheric venting “pssssh,” but after seeing your comment I feel a lot better about it, thanks for taking the time to leave your opinion 5 years ago LOL
I've been trying to figure this out for 5 hours today and finally stumbled on this video. I have a 2014 Jetta GLI Autobahn (GEN3) and the forums are just like you said. Looking for a dual port valve now. Thanks
I had an 09 STI with one of these GFB BOVs on it and a Cobb intake. I had tuned it with the Cobb accessport and wasn't running a really aggressive map (just stage 1, low wastegate), but had ringland failure after about 15k miles. The Subaru dealer was cool and did a warranty repair on it, but really thought it was do to a rich mixture that the engine failed. As he said in the video, make sure you get a GOOD tune if you put one on.
I think it did, but just not quick enough, so it would get just a bit rich on lift. Like a lot of people said, Subaru's are really sensitive to MAF. I recently got a 2015 STI, and did basically the same tune, but minus the BOV. I'm 6k into it and a couple track days as well, so we'll see what happens.
If you plan on setting up for flat foot shifting than I would say a recirculating BOV is better. If you are not doing that it doesn't really matter. Having a vent to atmosphere BOV can also cause backfiring when you shift or let off the gas. Backfiring and shooting flames out of your tailpipe is nifty.
You can still get a nice Whoosh sound from a bypass valve if you have a pod filter attached to the intake of the car, especially if you've replaced the factory rubber inlet pipe with a metal one. My 1.8t a4 makes a nice audible bov sound and it's fully recirculated.
+1 this. I have a K&N panel filter in a CDTi airbox on my Z20LET in my Astra, with a TurboSmart reciculating valve, and it is clearly audible. Not as loud as if I were to use a pod filter though, and definitely not as loud as a vent to atmoshpere bov.
So in a nutshell the only reason you vent to atmosphere is for the sound and best case scenario it doesn't really do damage. Worst case it makes your car shitty (bad idle, backfires,stalls)
It makes your car run like dookie if you don't have the right balance point. With my RDX I have to do a 70/30. 70% back to the intake 30% to atmosphere
We've tried many BOV on a Mitsubishi Evo, the best performing one is actually the factory one. It leaks just enough air so you don't get compressor surge, and you can tune it so the recirculated air with some negative ignition timing will give you mega pops and bangs from the exhaust, as in blows the exhaust gaskets to pieces lol. sounds better than a BOV any day
Even then the MAF shouldn't be metering flow when the TB is shut. No idea why they are even mentioning the "rich condition" off throttle. Hell the temperature of the air shouldn't even change that much. EVERY CAR has a slightly rich condition off throttle lol
I ran a vent to atmosphere BOV on a nearly stock Nissan SR20DET engine with a stock ECU and MAF for a long time,and absolutely never had any problems because of the BOV,whatsoever.
The recirculating bov will actually push air backwards across the MAF depending on the boost pressure....thereby still creating a rich condition as the air is metered twice. This air pressure wave will also blow backwards through your air filter.
FYI This entire topic/video pertains only to EFI and excludes carbureted vehicles. In fact when you run a BOV on a blow through carburetor this allows you to jet the primaries down which helps with fuel consumption. Even at 6 PSI still run a BOV.
Nice quick video and spot on. I'm told it's flat out illegal in NSW to vent to atmosphere, which is ridiculous. Do you know whether that is true Sir GFB? My car is supercharged, blows through a throttle body and uses MAP (amongst other things obviously) to determine fueling. Why should my bypass valve be illegal because it vents to air? Is it also illegal if I disconnect the intake pipe? Because it's the same thing essentially. So by the same logic, it must be illegal to have an air pump attached to nothing. They should be thanking me because I'm running that air through my air filter and huffing it back out. I'm HELPING the environment!
hybiepoo probably you have told wrong, the only thing I know it's illegal is blow the oil breather hose straight into the atmosfer, that way you are blowing oil vapor that goes to the intake manifold in a stock car
I want to fit a blow-off valve to my turbo vehicle, do I need a modification plate? Fitting a blow-off valve is considered a minor modification and does not require approval. When fitting a blow-off valve, it must be vented back into the vehicle's induction system. Blow-off valves that vent directly to the atmosphere must not be fitted. www.tmr.qld.gov.au/Safety/Vehicle-standards-and-modifications/Vehicle-modifications/Frequently-asked-questions-vehicle-standards-and-modifications.aspx#blow
It's only metered air if the BOV is behind the MAF. On a SC compressor setup the MAF is usually behind the BOV which means you can vent to atmosphere and not impact fuel.
I don't disagree with any of this, but there's something that's overlooked every time this is talked about. Every mechanism, port, valve, etc on the inside of the intake is protected by Factory design, by a simple air filter. If you run your valve to atmosphere, the components of your valve are now open to dust, engine heat, grime Etc. And if you run a piston type blow off valve like I've installed, its really just tolerance on the cylinder wall and Lube to get the tightest seal out of the internal cylinder. Lube attracts dust. Your valve May wear out quicker. If you run a diaphragm type, you are subjecting that diaphragm to engine heat possible dust fumes Etc that will make it dry out and crack and leak sooner . Thank you so much for this video it's a hundred percent correct, this is Just a point that's always seems to be overlooked, but in my opinion worth mentioning as I try to build my projects to outlast my great-grandchildren with as little maintenance as possible.
if it goes to atmosphere its more of a "psssh". My 180SX has a bolt in the end of a bit of vacuum pipe on the intake and that goes "sututututu" really fucking mint-ly. no bov at all
Perhaps you could walk us through how this would affect an engine running without an air flow meter? Like with aftermarket ECUs and some OEM's, like Saab Trionic 5. Since these systems doesn't calculate fuel based on air flow, surely they respond differently to the use of atmospheric BOV's?
I have a turbo kia forte and I disconected the reserc tube amd pluged the intake, no problems at all. Most CAI come with BPV deletes for it anyways. All depends on the car and i love my kia
If car has MAF sensor yes, its should lead to momentary rich condition and rpm spike and cat clogging. But if you have a MAP sensor, it doesnt matter. Also if you drive your car hard often enough you can usually get the CAt hot enough to burn off deposits
I think he is talking about a specific car manufacturer. Fords along with every other car company that I have seen under the hood have a mass air flow meter after the airbox, NOT before it. I took the recirculation hose off of my 2022 Ford Bronco 5 months ago without issue.
The bov only opens to release pressure that the turbo/turbos create by still spinning after the throttle body is closed. Manufacturers only use recirculating diverter valves to deaden the sound. It makes no difference if you recirculate the air, or vent it to atmosphere.
Shane Hubert Look, I’m not a genius expert on turbos but it doesn’t take a genius to have common sense. A blow off valve is getting the air from a turbo and throwing it to the atmosphere. Then when you are on the gas again the it’s throwing enough gas for the air that was supposed to be recirculated. It’s gonna give you a lag, then it’s gonna give you backfires because there’s too much gas. If you’ve driven any turbo car, put a BOV on it. It’ll run rich without a proper tune. Even with a tune I hear it won’t run 100% healthy. There’s a reason why the companies that make the BOVs put “Tune required”....
@@WheelsAndBusinessVlogs no, it's excess air that can either be recirculated, or vented out, your car doesnt just throw random amounts of air in no matter where it comes from. By that logic, when you get a bigger turbo and it takes much much longer to start making compressed air, the car would just run like shit and run rich, that's not how your engine works. It maintains an air to fuel ratio.
It really depends if the turbo vents upstream or downstream of the MAF sensor. I had a 21 bronco that vented upstream and swapped to vent to atmosphere and never had an issue. However, I could see how venting to atmosphere with a turbo after the MAF could potentially be a problem...
If you are going to have to put in a recirc in anyway, why not just recirc it all? Oh, you want the sound? You can fake that with a speaker and a few electronics. It's not like you're interested in genuine performance anyway. That or as others have said, do it right and measure the air after the valve, not before.
I tried this on my 2016 expedition. She ran a little warm, the whistle sounded more like a rush and the boost maxed from 15 to 16 psi. Do with that what you will.
Some VW 1.8 turbo and 2.7 biturbo has vacuum reservoir and N249 solenoid for DV to pert it at part throttle. If somebody want to swap to aftermarket blow-off without recirculation then must disconnect this vacuum system and connect it directly to intake manifold.
Actually if you know good tunner, you can "turn off" DV in ECU. It will not count air vented into atmosphere by BOV. The. It will work awesome. 1 thing, with bov you have little bigger lag because of vented out air from the system, but on the other hand, turbo will live longer. BOV is ok when your car is far away from stock. Flyes away
Thanks, most people don't even know what a stock one is. Good answers. I'll stay stock, not worth changing ,just to hear engine noise between shifts. Looking for power/ fuel economy. When I got my SONIC 1.4/6-sod. Wanted a ,"GASCAR."
Surely to solve all issues and problems it would be best to use a map sensor over a maf as this would read the pressure in the manifold and the ecu would adjust the fuel accordingly??? if your modifying a car make it safe and do it right
I have a question How do i know, that the blow off valve it's set up correct ? if i take my diesel car and put a valve on it, when do i know the setup it's wrong. You say it can makes a back fire, if it's setup wrong, so do i need to set the valve on it, og adjusting after what it sounds right ? It's maybe a dump question, but just to learn more. But a great video, just what i wanted.
Fun Fact: atmosphere blow off valves are not allowed in germany because of environmet reasons. Oil spills from the turbo could pollute the water/air when blown into the atmosphere. Dumb as shit, but true story.
It's the same in Australia, it's fun trying to explain to the cop that heard your turbo flutter that it doesn't have a blow off valve and didn't have one from the factory :P
This is all true for a factory MAF-based system. Whip that out and go standalone and it can (usually) be programmed to behave correctly without recirc.
I used to go atmo, until a policeman decided he didn't like it. Going plumb back made no difference to power or the way it ran. Still makes a bit of noise through the pod. 2JZGTE FTW.
a BOV is absolutely fine to use, especially when OEM versions can be really bad! But the best way to go it recirculation! BTW I didn't watch the video, I wanted to add my comment seeing that this video keeps stalking me!
MAP (Manifold Absolute Pressure) based ECU can vent to air without rich conditions. MAF (Mass Air Flow) based ECU can cause the rich condition as Brett said. But even if the car ECU is MAP based, some manufactures still use re-circulation as it is more quiet and some countries have laws on noise
So if you position your BOV so that it vents to atmosphere before the air passes through the MAF, then the MAF will be reading the amount of air entering the engine correctly.
I did ecu tune , down pipe , bmc filter and renntech bov for my amg gts , but it still runs like a stock amg gts just a bit faster. Is it because of bov
Prime example, on an ecoboost f150 the blow off valve tube connects after the mass air meter. With it like this there are no extreme rich or lean factors within the motor. And that is with the factory location capped off. Only difference is you don’t have useless vapors recirculated through the engine. Hense factory setups usually collect enough moisture within the inteecooler which cause the infimous hesitation on fords that people complain about. Let the crap vent and save future issues
brilliant video, and thanks for not wearing a black tshirt and looking like a floating head and arms with a black background. really intersiting video, and great to hear some talking sense. ok random question. can you put a Blow off valve on a turbo diesel, venting to atmosphere a engine with a Ecu and an engine without an ecu its for a show car i just want it to go woshhhhh.
no mention of part throttle i.e on track cars mid corner, as i had overfuling issue on my mx5/miata turbo before i went with a stand alone MAP based ecu.
DONKEHOTE agreed. so I'll drop this: I know for a fact that the 2.0 turbo FSI in Volkswagen and Audi's will throw a code for underboost if you vent straight to atmosphere without using VAGCom or Ross to adjust for it. the newer TSI engines use manifold sensors instead of airflow sensors, so late model mk5 and up can *usually* do so without coding.
Im a saab specialist myself, and on non Trionic 5 cars its almost impossible to vent to atmosphere without moving the maf post blowoff valve. If you do vent to atmosphere on a saab running t7 or any bosch/lucas system, youl probably end up with 1)Check Engine Light 2)Runs rough/possible stall right after venting 3)More than likely limp home mode Sounds like a blowoff valve though (insert your preference here)
DONKEHOTE my 2001 93 b205l t7 was running a fully atmospheric dump valve with no running or idling issues, unfortunately it did have cel which pissed me off so ended up fitting an original Bosch one on and I had to reset the error code / turn the light off.
MAF is before the turbo and boost is only built after the turbo. There's nothing upstream of the MAF to blow-off. MAP/BPS (same-same), however, is either in the inter-cooler output line or on the intake manifold and is pretty much just used to determine when to activate the TCV/BCV (Turbo/Boost Control Valve).
all I needed to hear was one person saying its okay to vent to atmosphere, now I'm gonna buy one
Running this BOV would you need a tune?
@@Cheezel909 no
Lol
Atta boy, just got one put on my ST with a true vacuum source and it sounds amazing! Do it.
I dun need validation I just need my car to go Pshhhh psshhhhh!
so when venting to atmosphere the mixture becomes rich meaning not all of the fuel will be burnt dumping un-burnt fuel to the exhaust where if sufficiently heated may cause it to reignite.... AKA shooting dank ass flames
S-man 16 I like the way you think 😏
S-man 16 EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT
Carmicha3l it vents when throttle plate is closed and there is fuel cut off when throttle closes therefore not dumping much fuel with an atmosphere blow off, as explained in the video
Carmicha3l I often hear people complaining about the reliability of modded Subarus
If it is so unhealthy to run the engine rich then why do a lot of modified cars (including mine) run on decel ignition cut and not decel fuel cut?
It didn't blow the turbo on the Subaru and it doesn't wreck your engine.
Please provide me with facts towards your argument.
The answer is yes.
I recommend getting a GFB TMS respons hybrid BOV so that way you can vent whatever percentage you want and won't trigger a check engine light
I'm liking this new series and how technical it is. As mentioned in the video, it's good to get a professional opinion that isn't some bloke on a forum site.
Very true!
Just a Bloke that works for GFB and is trying to sell you stuff......
+Truzo doesnt mean the info isnt pertinent.
The absolute best thing you can do is, get an adjustable one, when you’re racing keep it closed and when you go to a meet, open it up.
Venting to atmosphere sounds so much better though
That 2 port blow off value was the best item I purchased for my rexy. Made the best sounds, and when I got pulled over, I just quickly turned it to 100% recirculation and got away defect free :)
do you backfire a lot more with it?
@@moto324 i have a proceed GT and haven't noticed my car to backfire any more than it already does. I have it half open, and i keep myscrew driver handy, in case I need to adjust mine, as it has a manual adjustment lever, not fancy remote control haha. The GFB DVX is what I have.
fun fact, Brett means Wide in Swedish, so go fast Brett in Swenglish translates to Go fast Wide, as in when you drift. or "åka på tvären" as we say here. great series btw
If you run a MAP sensor rather then MAF you won't experience lean conditions ! Surprised this wasn't mentioned.
alexnelson09 rich*
You mean speed density off of your MAP. I have a Speed 3 and we have MAFs and MAPs. But our air is metered at the MAF, so we end up venting metered air, getting idle bounce, afterfires, etc., esp if you're venting too much. If you vent just a little, you're usually okay.
It was sort of mentioned. Brett explicitly said "if your car has an air-flow meter"
Numinous For a stock 2004 Subaru Forester xt turbo, which BOV would you recommend and would you also recommend a 50/50 ratio? Thanks
Some people's MAF and IAT are sort of spilt up, you can move your IAT right before your manifold after the BOV. Then delete the MAF with a MAP based tuned. Obviously only can do this if you have a MAP sensor on the intake somewhere. Boom problem solved.
Awesome video guys, love that you are helping to clarify issues you've found on the internet with people that actually know what they are talking about!!
I was just wondering if you could clarify how you would go about determining the correct spring tension for your b.o.v in order to not cause stalling or backfiring. I.e how do you go about setting it up correctly ??
Cheers
And love the videos !!
Good video I found it was just easy to move the maff after the blow off valve that way the air that is being discharged never passes threw the mass air but yes most GM that I tune have DFCO deceleration fuel cut off as soon as your foot leaves the pedal your AFR is flat lined shutting off fuel. When tuning even in open loop with DFCO disabled still don’t see rich conditions even if so a little extra fuel will keep them cylinders cool lol thanks for the info brother God Bless
i'd like to see a follow up of this covering the differences between EFI systems using MAP sensors instead of MAF sensors and also Blow through Carby setups.
Thank you Go Fast Brett!! Always a delight to devour your knowledge!!
Intestine video! On the turbo system that's on my Focus, the blow off valve is before the MAF so it makes no difference to idle or AFR when I vent to atmosphere. I'm also using an OEM diverter valve off of an Audi, and seems to work just fine as well. But of course, I specifically designed the system to have all of the venting stuff before the MAF so I could avoid all of these problems. But I don't know if most OEM turbo systems work that way, so probably trust Brett ;)
What I've always been told is that it might gunk up your first catalyser. That's it. The unburnt fuel will just gunk it up over a (very) lengthy period of time, after which you either change it or just cancel it lol. I prefer keeping them as I'm not a fan of smelly cars, and they are a few hundred bucks I beleive, but yeah if you go with a 50-50 valve... You should be fine. I had one on my '04 WRX, and even tho subarus are reputed to not liking BOVs too much, with th 50-50 one, I had it on the car for 3 years and everything was still perfectly good.
Newer into the car scene & just grabbed a GFB TMS for my WRX. 50/50 was my plan anyways based off of still having air recirculating and still getting the atmospheric venting “pssssh,” but after seeing your comment I feel a lot better about it, thanks for taking the time to leave your opinion 5 years ago LOL
bwaaaaaaaa sutututu
Deivi Y how do you know the sound i make when i shit?!?!?!?
Deivi Y from your dump pipe?
More from the wastegate
Woooooottt pshhhhhh***
Sututututu is the Turbo.. due to an Anti-Lag system.. lol not the BOV.
I've been trying to figure this out for 5 hours today and finally stumbled on this video. I have a 2014 Jetta GLI Autobahn (GEN3) and the forums are just like you said. Looking for a dual port valve now. Thanks
I had an 09 STI with one of these GFB BOVs on it and a Cobb intake. I had tuned it with the Cobb accessport and wasn't running a really aggressive map (just stage 1, low wastegate), but had ringland failure after about 15k miles. The Subaru dealer was cool and did a warranty repair on it, but really thought it was do to a rich mixture that the engine failed. As he said in the video, make sure you get a GOOD tune if you put one on.
Wouldn't the ecu cut fuel on lift off anyway or was that not how that car was tuned (I.e. tuned wrong).
I think it did, but just not quick enough, so it would get just a bit rich on lift. Like a lot of people said, Subaru's are really sensitive to MAF. I recently got a 2015 STI, and did basically the same tune, but minus the BOV. I'm 6k into it and a couple track days as well, so we'll see what happens.
mean while venting to atmo is illegal here in Australia
Austrailia has the most sissy traffic laws I've ever seen, it can even piss me off while not living in Australia.
So even farting in public is illegal?
Jesse Kelly damn tht sucks
Mean while its neighboring country nz has literally no law against modification
meanwhile our metro buses use their noisy af airbrakes
Depends on what monitor u have. MAP or MAF. MAP can be vented to atmosphere for not, MAF only can be recirc
If you plan on setting up for flat foot shifting than I would say a recirculating BOV is better. If you are not doing that it doesn't really matter. Having a vent to atmosphere BOV can also cause backfiring when you shift or let off the gas. Backfiring and shooting flames out of your tailpipe is nifty.
This totally missed out on factoring in cars that do not run a MAF/AFM.
True, but I reckon that people who watch technical videos like this can figure that out by themselves.
So an adjustable blow off valve apparantly allows to tune how many flames you shoot out? I love it
You can still get a nice Whoosh sound from a bypass valve if you have a pod filter attached to the intake of the car, especially if you've replaced the factory rubber inlet pipe with a metal one. My 1.8t a4 makes a nice audible bov sound and it's fully recirculated.
+1 this. I have a K&N panel filter in a CDTi airbox on my Z20LET in my Astra, with a TurboSmart reciculating valve, and it is clearly audible. Not as loud as if I were to use a pod filter though, and definitely not as loud as a vent to atmoshpere bov.
So in a nutshell the only reason you vent to atmosphere is for the sound and best case scenario it doesn't really do damage. Worst case it makes your car shitty (bad idle, backfires,stalls)
It makes your car run like dookie if you don't have the right balance point. With my RDX I have to do a 70/30. 70% back to the intake 30% to atmosphere
If the valve is closed when idling and throttling you should be okay to vta. But I could wrong. Please let me know if I am . I'm inclined to learn.
Here is an easy way to determine the bov you should have.
-MAP sensor-Atmospheric BOV
-MAF sensor-Recirculated BOV
We've tried many BOV on a Mitsubishi Evo, the best performing one is actually the factory one. It leaks just enough air so you don't get compressor surge, and you can tune it so the recirculated air with some negative ignition timing will give you mega pops and bangs from the exhaust, as in blows the exhaust gaskets to pieces lol. sounds better than a BOV any day
My exhaust gaskets have to be changed literally every 6 months on my evo 😂
This was the most informative video I’ve ever watched on TH-cam re - BOV. Top job mate 👍👍👍
Can confirm Turbo falcons can go full atmospheric Bov without issues
Irrelevant if your car uses a MAP not a MAF.
Alvin Brinson this is true cause the MAP sensor is AFTER the BOV.
Even then the MAF shouldn't be metering flow when the TB is shut. No idea why they are even mentioning the "rich condition" off throttle. Hell the temperature of the air shouldn't even change that much.
EVERY CAR has a slightly rich condition off throttle lol
So bov can cause backfire, and loud whoosh sound? He talked me into it.
I ran a vent to atmosphere BOV on a nearly stock Nissan SR20DET engine with a stock ECU and MAF for a long time,and absolutely never had any problems because of the BOV,whatsoever.
The recirculating bov will actually push air backwards across the MAF depending on the boost pressure....thereby still creating a rich condition as the air is metered twice. This air pressure wave will also blow backwards through your air filter.
So if you dont adjust it correctly worse case you stall it and then just keep readjusting till is stops stalling? And or back fires
This guy is amazing, very good information and explained well, thanks for the wisdom mate, appreciate it!
FYI This entire topic/video pertains only to EFI and excludes carbureted vehicles. In fact when you run a BOV on a blow through carburetor this allows you to jet the primaries down which helps with fuel consumption. Even at 6 PSI still run a BOV.
Nice quick video and spot on. I'm told it's flat out illegal in NSW to vent to atmosphere, which is ridiculous. Do you know whether that is true Sir GFB? My car is supercharged, blows through a throttle body and uses MAP (amongst other things obviously) to determine fueling. Why should my bypass valve be illegal because it vents to air? Is it also illegal if I disconnect the intake pipe? Because it's the same thing essentially. So by the same logic, it must be illegal to have an air pump attached to nothing. They should be thanking me because I'm running that air through my air filter and huffing it back out. I'm HELPING the environment!
hybiepoo probably you have told wrong, the only thing I know it's illegal is blow the oil breather hose straight into the atmosfer, that way you are blowing oil vapor that goes to the intake manifold in a stock car
Even that is not true for everything. Older cars never had PCV.
In Queensland vent to atmosphere Blow Of Valve is illegal for street use.
I want to fit a blow-off valve to my turbo vehicle, do I need a modification plate?
Fitting a blow-off valve is considered a minor modification and does not require approval. When fitting a blow-off valve, it must be vented back into the vehicle's induction system. Blow-off valves that vent directly to the atmosphere must not be fitted.
www.tmr.qld.gov.au/Safety/Vehicle-standards-and-modifications/Vehicle-modifications/Frequently-asked-questions-vehicle-standards-and-modifications.aspx#blow
john reece so nsw is probably the same. Understandable for airflow meter applications, but ridiculous on MAP based vehicles.
It's only metered air if the BOV is behind the MAF. On a SC compressor setup the MAF is usually behind the BOV which means you can vent to atmosphere and not impact fuel.
You can move the MAF to the pressure side of the turbo after the BOV.
Anton Larsson 🤦♂️
Don’t do that please
I don't disagree with any of this, but there's something that's overlooked every time this is talked about. Every mechanism, port, valve, etc on the inside of the intake is protected by Factory design, by a simple air filter. If you run your valve to atmosphere, the components of your valve are now open to dust, engine heat, grime Etc. And if you run a piston type blow off valve like I've installed, its really just tolerance on the cylinder wall and Lube to get the tightest seal out of the internal cylinder. Lube attracts dust. Your valve May wear out quicker. If you run a diaphragm type, you are subjecting that diaphragm to engine heat possible dust fumes Etc that will make it dry out and crack and leak sooner . Thank you so much for this video it's a hundred percent correct, this is Just a point that's always seems to be overlooked, but in my opinion worth mentioning as I try to build my projects to outlast my great-grandchildren with as little maintenance as possible.
I have a GFB Respons installed on my Impreza... really nice valve!
SiriousSandals Did you need a tune?
Does yours backfire?
@@Tony-tk4ht Every now and again, sometimes get a big pop after a dump
So "sutututu" from the engine bay and "bang bang" and flames from the exhaust? Sounds pretty freaking good to me! :D
if it goes to atmosphere its more of a "psssh". My 180SX has a bolt in the end of a bit of vacuum pipe on the intake and that goes "sututututu" really fucking mint-ly. no bov at all
The "sututututu" comes from the air decelerating the turbo which is not that great for its lifespan, at leats that is how I understood it.
Short answer: if you're venting metered air, it CAN be okay, depending.... It also can be very bad. If you're speed density based, no worries...
Perhaps you could walk us through how this would affect an engine running without an air flow meter? Like with aftermarket ECUs and some OEM's, like Saab Trionic 5. Since these systems doesn't calculate fuel based on air flow, surely they respond differently to the use of atmospheric BOV's?
I have a turbo kia forte and I disconected the reserc tube amd pluged the intake, no problems at all. Most CAI come with BPV deletes for it anyways. All depends on the car and i love my kia
If car has MAF sensor yes, its should lead to momentary rich condition and rpm spike and cat clogging. But if you have a MAP sensor, it doesnt matter. Also if you drive your car hard often enough you can usually get the CAt hot enough to burn off deposits
I think he is talking about a specific car manufacturer. Fords along with every other car company that I have seen under the hood have a mass air flow meter after the airbox, NOT before it. I took the recirculation hose off of my 2022 Ford Bronco 5 months ago without issue.
The bov only opens to release pressure that the turbo/turbos create by still spinning after the throttle body is closed. Manufacturers only use recirculating diverter valves to deaden the sound. It makes no difference if you recirculate the air, or vent it to atmosphere.
That is completely wrong lol
@@WheelsAndBusinessVlogs no, it's not
Shane Hubert Look, I’m not a genius expert on turbos but it doesn’t take a genius to have common sense. A blow off valve is getting the air from a turbo and throwing it to the atmosphere. Then when you are on the gas again the it’s throwing enough gas for the air that was supposed to be recirculated. It’s gonna give you a lag, then it’s gonna give you backfires because there’s too much gas. If you’ve driven any turbo car, put a BOV on it. It’ll run rich without a proper tune. Even with a tune I hear it won’t run 100% healthy. There’s a reason why the companies that make the BOVs put “Tune required”....
@@WheelsAndBusinessVlogs no, it's excess air that can either be recirculated, or vented out, your car doesnt just throw random amounts of air in no matter where it comes from. By that logic, when you get a bigger turbo and it takes much much longer to start making compressed air, the car would just run like shit and run rich, that's not how your engine works. It maintains an air to fuel ratio.
@@WheelsAndBusinessVlogs also, i drive a 335i and I assure you that it doesn't lag any more with a recirculated diverter valve vs my hks bov.
Forgot to say that if your car doesn't have a MAF or a AFM you can vent without any real affects.
"I'm not here to debate that right now" well said Brett.
so happy this show is still going I love the GFB series so informative!
It really depends if the turbo vents upstream or downstream of the MAF sensor. I had a 21 bronco that vented upstream and swapped to vent to atmosphere and never had an issue. However, I could see how venting to atmosphere with a turbo after the MAF could potentially be a problem...
Thank you for clearing this up with actual knowledge
If you are going to have to put in a recirc in anyway, why not just recirc it all? Oh, you want the sound? You can fake that with a speaker and a few electronics. It's not like you're interested in genuine performance anyway.
That or as others have said, do it right and measure the air after the valve, not before.
This guys explains it nicely. Thanks Brett.
Go fast brett, shutting down forum know it alls.
Love it.
I tried this on my 2016 expedition. She ran a little warm, the whistle sounded more like a rush and the boost maxed from 15 to 16 psi. Do with that what you will.
Some VW 1.8 turbo and 2.7 biturbo has vacuum reservoir and N249 solenoid for DV to pert it at part throttle. If somebody want to swap to aftermarket blow-off without recirculation then must disconnect this vacuum system and connect it directly to intake manifold.
Yaaaa I don’t get the obsession for the BOV sound. I be about that EWG life though
I love the nerdery of this series. It's so good.
Good information and friendly as always. Thank you, Mr. Brett :)
Speed density carries the day yet again!
Actually if you know good tunner, you can "turn off" DV in ECU. It will not count air vented into atmosphere by BOV. The. It will work awesome. 1 thing, with bov you have little bigger lag because of vented out air from the system, but on the other hand, turbo will live longer. BOV is ok when your car is far away from stock. Flyes away
How about a video on how to make the different blow off valve sounds, like chirp vs flutter vs whoosh vs whistle.
Vegaspsycho .... I know right.... the #1 questions keep getting ask is that . And everyone seems to talk.about everything but that
Different bovs different sounds. Hks ssqv has a nice chirp.
The tututu is not the bov nor is it good for the turbo, its the air going back through the compressor wheel and that shit fucks with it.
at the end of each go fast brett video he should tell us what he uses on his car or at least what he recommends we use on ours
Best explanation video around!
Thanks, most people don't even know what a stock one is.
Good answers.
I'll stay stock, not worth changing ,just to hear engine noise between shifts.
Looking for power/ fuel economy.
When I got my SONIC 1.4/6-sod. Wanted a ,"GASCAR."
Surely to solve all issues and problems it would be best to use a map sensor over a maf as this would read the pressure in the manifold and the ecu would adjust the fuel accordingly??? if your modifying a car make it safe and do it right
Great episode. Would have been nice to mention MAP cars and put that one to bed.
time to run a bov venting to atmosphere on my draw through carby setup.
Brett! You forgot about part throttle lifting on AFM cars under boost!
I have a question
How do i know, that the blow off valve it's set up correct ? if i take my diesel car and put a valve on it, when do i know the setup it's wrong. You say it can makes a back fire, if it's setup wrong, so do i need to set the valve on it, og adjusting after what it sounds right ? It's maybe a dump question, but just to learn more.
But a great video, just what i wanted.
Thanks you solved my problem Brett Happy Easter My Doggy!!!!
Fun Fact: atmosphere blow off valves are not allowed in germany because of environmet reasons. Oil spills from the turbo could pollute the water/air when blown into the atmosphere. Dumb as shit, but true story.
It's the same in Australia, it's fun trying to explain to the cop that heard your turbo flutter that it doesn't have a blow off valve and didn't have one from the factory :P
This is all true for a factory MAF-based system. Whip that out and go standalone and it can (usually) be programmed to behave correctly without recirc.
I used to go atmo, until a policeman decided he didn't like it. Going plumb back made no difference to power or the way it ran. Still makes a bit of noise through the pod. 2JZGTE FTW.
a BOV is absolutely fine to use, especially when OEM versions can be really bad! But the best way to go it recirculation! BTW I didn't watch the video, I wanted to add my comment seeing that this video keeps stalking me!
Why the hell comment under a video you didn't watch? You didn't even read the title correctly.
The video kept stalking me and the title is predictable!
I think my blow off might be saving my clutch right now since im not constantly running boost on my Si with this +6 tune
I guess it doesn't matter because it's a defect lol
re-circulation it is then
lmao exactly what i was thinking
In Australia maybe. Not elsewhere
considering my car vents to atmosphere from factory...i think its safe to say my can vent to atmosphere be safe lol
What car is it?
MAP (Manifold Absolute Pressure) based ECU can vent to air without rich conditions. MAF (Mass Air Flow) based ECU can cause the rich condition as Brett said.
But even if the car ECU is MAP based, some manufactures still use re-circulation as it is more quiet and some countries have laws on noise
So if you position your BOV so that it vents to atmosphere before the air passes through the MAF, then the MAF will be reading the amount of air entering the engine correctly.
backfiring? sign me up 🚗💥
“If you have it set up wrong you can cause backfiring” hmmm intrigued..😆
I did ecu tune , down pipe , bmc filter and renntech bov for my amg gts , but it still runs like a stock amg gts just a bit faster.
Is it because of bov
This was great and very informative, thanks Brett and GFB!
How old is that Dell laptop
Great video. Very intelligent, and excellent message delivery. Subed, hope to see more.
And if you have a MAP instead of a MAF it doesn't even matter. CHOO!
Prime example, on an ecoboost f150 the blow off valve tube connects after the mass air meter. With it like this there are no extreme rich or lean factors within the motor. And that is with the factory location capped off. Only difference is you don’t have useless vapors recirculated through the engine. Hense factory setups usually collect enough moisture within the inteecooler which cause the infimous hesitation on fords that people complain about. Let the crap vent and save future issues
If I’m wrong Please let me know. All I have to say is I’ve built enough boosted motors that are still running today that have had no issues.
Thank you for talking sense!
Does Go Fast Brett have a business name?Another excellent video from Brett.
brilliant video, and thanks for not wearing a black tshirt and looking like a floating head and arms with a black background. really intersiting video, and great to hear some talking sense.
ok random question. can you put a Blow off valve on a turbo diesel, venting to atmosphere
a engine with a Ecu
and an engine without an ecu
its for a show car i just want it to go woshhhhh.
I blew off my valve when I saw Brett 😉
no mention of part throttle i.e on track cars mid corner, as i had overfuling issue on my mx5/miata turbo before i went with a stand alone MAP based ecu.
wow thank you for this video, super helpful
no mention of Check engine light possibilities? Huh. I would have thought he would have mentioned that at least in passing.
DONKEHOTE agreed. so I'll drop this:
I know for a fact that the 2.0 turbo FSI in Volkswagen and Audi's will throw a code for underboost if you vent straight to atmosphere without using VAGCom or Ross to adjust for it.
the newer TSI engines use manifold sensors instead of airflow sensors, so late model mk5 and up can *usually* do so without coding.
Im a saab specialist myself, and on non Trionic 5 cars its almost impossible to vent to atmosphere without moving the maf post blowoff valve.
If you do vent to atmosphere on a saab running t7 or any bosch/lucas system, youl probably end up with
1)Check Engine Light
2)Runs rough/possible stall right after venting
3)More than likely limp home mode
Sounds like a blowoff valve though (insert your preference here)
DONKEHOTE my 2001 93 b205l t7 was running a fully atmospheric dump valve with no running or idling issues, unfortunately it did have cel which pissed me off so ended up fitting an original Bosch one on and I had to reset the error code / turn the light off.
i put on a pod filter and removed all the silencers in the intake and get a fantastic purge sound, and my car still has the factory diverter valve.
Why not put the BOV upstream of the MAF sensor? The expelled air wouldn't be metered.
MAF is before the turbo and boost is only built after the turbo. There's nothing upstream of the MAF to blow-off.
MAP/BPS (same-same), however, is either in the inter-cooler output line or on the intake manifold and is pretty much just used to determine when to activate the TCV/BCV (Turbo/Boost Control Valve).
Rich conditions = VROOM PTSHH BANG POPOPOPOPOP BANG.
Should I? Probably not. Will I? Absolutely.