Heidegger: Being and Time Part II - Time
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ส.ค. 2018
- In this video, I take an introductory look at Heidegger's interpretation of time, as laid out in Division Two of his seminal text, Being and Time.
Then & Now is FAN-FUNDED! Support me on Patreon and pledge as little as $1 per video: patreon.com/user?u=3517018
Or send me a one-off tip of any amount and help me make more videos:
www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
Follow me on:
Facebook: thethenandnow
Instagram: / thethenandnow
Twitter: / lewlewwaller
I'd have liked if you'd continued from the promise at the end of part 1, that's what I was expecting in 2. Moment of vision gone askew? Love the explanations.
Thank you - I will get there at some point!
@@ThenNow Well? Or was this some futurist fancy? :)
@@eduarddouwesdekker5997 hahahahaha
@@ThenNow Please make the vid
@@fatpotatoe6039 did he.make it
This channel is going to be BIG!!! Sheer quality, keep it up!
Thank you!
"New!" To the the realm,realms and or worlds, concepts, theories, ideologies and philosophies of Philosophy, I find the channel "Then & Now" astonishingly insightfull. Thank you for your presentations.
I think you’ve already noticed that you had omitted the discussion on his political views, but we forgive you because this video is really well-structured and explanatory.
People make too much about Heidegger's political preferences. This is only a mystery because the mainstream has made National Socialism as some kind of evil manifestation with supernatural implications instead of seeing it for what it really is: simply one of several choices in the 1930s which was a time of crisis.
Appreciate the quality! This channel definitely has the potential to become a lot bigger.
The fact that he didnt talk about Heidegger's politics after he said he would is an example of futurality. We like to invent possible futures and then stress ourselves out about them, whether they will haopen, or why they didnt happen in the way we predicted.
Thank you to:
Owen Pitcairn
and Robert Moore
For sponsoring this video on Patreon with pledges of $10+
It's a huge help and is the only way I can make these videos, so thank you!
I also have magnets to giveaway to $5+ Patreons and ALL supporters get early access to scripts, audio and upcoming research.
About time.
Thanks for this, Heidegger's writing is incredibly complex and this explains it really simply and coherently
Nice work! Please continue updating this kind of material
Einstein did not say that time is "subjective" in the sense that it's different for each person. The "relativity" he was referring to is that time slows down at higher speeds approaching light-speed. So it scarcely has anything to do with Heidegger's philosophical description of time.
Nonetheless the idea of Time in Heidegger is indeed somewhat compatible with modern physics. General relativity revealed that time is not linear per se and what exists is the group of events that all together form, for example, your life, and these events are embedded in space-time. It is not that you first are born, then grow and then die. It's more like all these things co-exist together in a corner of space-time, and you can be defined as this group of events linked by causality. Past-present-future (and space), somehow they are one single entity.
@@brunopiga663 That's very interesting to mention. Philosophy allows us to completely change our view of what time looks like, and the view relativity presents is quite the feast (although I'd argue it only somewhat resembles Heidegger. I think he was simply describing our conscious selves as existing beyond just "the present"). But then what about our conscious awareness of time? Could we describe it as some kind of illusion produced by evolutionary adaptation?
Very valid comment. I'm not super familiar with this subject, but I do know the philosopher Henri Bergson had a famous debate about this with Einstein. Bergson defended the stance that time was subjective for each individual, but Einstein most successfully refuted the philosopher's thoughts, arguing what you just mentioned
Thanks man. This cheered up my NYE LOL.
We all know that this channel definitely deserves more views, but I think it should grow on its own pace... I applaud you for not turning this into anything hip or pop, in an attempt to attract more viewers. Keep up the good work.
I can’t even distinguish between subject and predicatory phrases in his works wtf
This is such a good video. I appreciate you explaining such a complicated subject like time really simply
On the scientific side, it isn't just Einstein and relativity that have issues with time, it is also deeply problematic in quantum mechanics. There is no "time" operator that exists. The attempts to settle this are numerous, with things like the "Clock dependent Schrödinger equation". Also, relational quantum mechanics, which tries to settle some of the issues of observer dependence of things. I know this is a philosophy channel, but wanted to throw out some tangential but perhaps related concepts. Great video!
This is amazing content. Please make more of these videos. There is a lack of "time" videos on youtube so this is great!
Thank you - hoping to do more on the subject soon. Interested in how clocks and watches had an affect on people's perception of time historically when they were invented
This two part series was so helpful for my understanding.
0:19 Yup. That "errr what!?" sums up Heidegger for me.
Wonderful explanation
Thank you!
We don’t coordinate the predictability of the clock around the earth revolving about the sun. But I feel you, dawg.
This was good. Well done.
Time is a construct a utilitarian tool determined by sensual experiences. The sensual experience of a fly for example means a fly has a different perception of time.
To be able to express what we experience im philiosophical lamguage. What a man. We are time.
Good work, you!
Are you living authentically -That’s brilliant
About time.
Interesting parallel with psychology of memory, episodic memory of events happening in personal history seems to be a uniquely human feature.
Is Heideggerian “care” a re-vamped version of phenomenological “intentionality”?
(I’m aware of Heidegger’s portrayal of phenomenology and his relation with Husserl)
Absent deferring to an authority on the matter, my own understanding of the concept would suggest as much--that Heideggerian care is indeed a product of the philosopher's broad and idiosyncratic redefining of basic phenomenological terminology. This was an explicit aim of his larger project, after all.
Care seems to occupy a more fundamental role in Heidegger's conception of the human being than does phenomenological intentionality, however. Care is the moral matrix of human life, the essential--or "primordial", to use Heidegger's own language--medium in which the relationship between the human being and the world unfolds and is realized, whereas intentionality might be construed as just one of several technical dimensions human action.
Hope this is of some use to you.
the more we integrate our pasts and therefore our future, the more we are in touch with our True Selves in the present. (:
Yes. I think he starts with Plato and Aristotle and notes that they fail to properly define Being. Descartes hasn't really defined what thinking is I think is another objection to his Cogito. Heidegger is also a "metaphysician" but talks of Being in the World and so on. It seems an impossible thing though for Dasein to examine itself...
Delightful! I've been diving into Heidegger hardcore lately and this was lovely. What do you think of the concept that humans/consciousness is itself time? Essentially that humans are both creations out of time and part of time itself. It holds itself up. These concepts are frightfully difficult to put into words, it's no wonder Heidegger's work is so convoluted!
Physicist and Heidegger fan here; time doesnt excist in physics, but it is an insanely relevant tool to understand many phenomenon on a mechanical level. What does excist is the second law of thermodynamics also called the arrow of time and this is what physicist believes gives us a sensation of time moving. What Heidegger is talking about is the dasein concept of time where we understand time as a beginning and an end because of the horizons that we are bound to. In nature this does not excist, only change of state and transformation of energy excist.
Top Video mate. Earned my sub. Quick note though: The ticking was too loud.
Gracias. Me hace falta aún mejorar mi comprensión auditiva para entender, comprender de lo que me hablas
If you understand how ancient Northern Europeans viewed time then you see Heidegger was explaining his ancestors understanding of time in a new (at the time) language.
@Bailey Webb Could you provide some sources for me to explore? Sounds interesting.
@@FelixConstant I second this.
Me too
How is Heidegger's idea of originary time different from Bergson's durae
I was hoping to see you bring up his associations to the Nazi regime, which you said you would in the previous video.
I can find the Intro but not Part One.
Heidegger should’ve studied Cantors theorem, infinity isn’t the same as everything.
What is your accent ?
Great video but the ticking became a little bit annoying. Made it hard to focus on what you were saying. (I understand it wasn't on long, but the volume of the ticking was just a little too high in relation to your voice) Otherwise this was really well put together. I'm reading Heidegger atm, this helped a lot. Thank you :)
It would be sick to get some moishe postone on here
So I see... we’ve all been spammed with “Rainy Jazz”
What do I do with this information?
Metaphysics. You do metaphysics.
You finally think of something other than what you want to stick up your butt tomorrow
Who tf are the thunderbirds ?
What’s the point of being aware of time as a subjective thing tho?
It matters for psychology and the study of the mind, and of course the mental-physical relationships of brain/perception etc. Learning to master ones own experience of time can also be useful, such as appreciating moments and getting the most out of our moments
I believe there is a difference between political commitment and philosophical commitment.at least in America.
TTTTTTTAAAAIIIIMMMMM
Huh, I can't disagree
**mmmmmmmeeeeeeoooooOOOOOOOOOoooOOOooooOOOoooow**
concentrate!
Then & Now 🐈😂👌🏻✌🏻👊🏻🙏🏻🥊👊🏻😏
What is the point if nobody talks about Wittgenstein? He made it much better than any other philosopher. And much clearer than Heidegger's gibberish.
I find both very unsientiffic and more of psychologists than philosophers. I hate when people create their private frameworks and terminologies that only complicate things rather than explain reality. And I find it funny how other people disagree while trying to explain what the authors had in mind.
No yes
so there is no present, only past and future.
We “live ahead of ourselves” because how we relate to the world is determined by something else. What we like, what is important, what we care about and what we do is Guna and Karma.
4:26 I was about to click off....
Yikes, he really does complicate things. Time is a human measurement between two points, just like space. The measurement is a human invention but the thing we're measuring is real, whether we measure it or not. This is the distinction that needs to be made. We are NOT time. Our feelings, experience and confusion in understanding/measuring has no bearing on reality, except the production of convoluted thinking like this. And I would not say time is 'personal' but local. Again, time is not affected by our personal perception or imaginings, which is all he's talking about.
That's not at all what he said
@@timquigley986 How so?
There is no time. Time is non-existant. There only is everything in eternity. And in eternity everything just is, floating from one manifestation into another. Nothing really ever stops, it just proceeds.
You told me in pt 1 that i should watch pt 2 to get to know more about heideggers nazism. I feel cheated :( otherwise good video
Same here. It's a shame more viewers have not commented this so to bring attention to the channel's promised presence but actual omission of the question at hand. For this is the question concerning Heidegger that cannot pass in silence.
For now, I refer you to Berel Lang's: The Silence of Heidegger & Stanley Rosen's: The Reversal of Heidegger
your voice sounds like tom hardy
Cat Video would have been more interesting.
Time is "subjective", tell that to your boss, coming to work at odd times and leaving odd times. Proof charlatan "thinker" is full of it. Time made his home wealth and a large home in the good neighborhood. Time made him have simpleton students in unreadable books and speeches. He just "wished" upon it and his "subjective" came true. SMH
It's not that time is "subjective," its that time is not something that can be understood on its own, it can be only be understood through our perception of it (which is a Kantian idea). Heideggar draws from this and says that WE are time. We are the only things that bring time into existence, not something objective out of our realm of understanding.