Introduction to Deleuze: Difference and Repetition
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ธ.ค. 2018
- I introduce the thought of Gilles Deleuze through his 1968 book, Difference and Repetition. I look at Deleuze's basic concepts - especially difference, repetition and the virtual; his relationship to philosophers like Spinoza and Kant; and how he provides some of the ontological foundations for other 'poststructural' or postmodern theorists like Foucault and Derrida.
I also look at the relationship between the virtual, the Idea and the multiplicity - all important concepts for understanding the rest of Deleuze's work. This introduction should serve to give a fuller understanding of ideas like the Rhizome, the haecceity and 'lines of flight' that are a large part of his later work with Félix Guattari - a Thousand Plateaus. Most importantly, I try to make understanding Deleuze as simple as possible!
Then & Now is FAN-FUNDED! Support me on Patreon and pledge as little as $1 per video: patreon.com/user?u=3517018
Or send me a one-off tip of any amount and help me make more videos:
www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
Buy on Amazon through this link to support the channel:
amzn.to/2ykJe6L
Follow me on:
Facebook: thethenandnow
Instagram: / thethenandnow
Twitter: / lewlewwaller
Credits:
Stock footage provided by Videvo, downloaded from www.videvo.net
Foucault Image:
By Nemomain
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
Edited by Lewis Waller
Image of Derrida:
By Chinmoy Guha
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
Edited by Lewis Waller
Image of Deleuze:
By trenutna
sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%94...
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
Edited by Lewis Waller
Music:
Cylinder Five by Chris Zabriskie is licensed under a Creative Commons License: creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
Script & sources at: www.thenandnow.co/2023/04/25/introduction-to-deleuze-difference-and-repetition/
► Sign up for the newsletter to get concise digestible summaries: www.thenandnow.co/the-newsletter/
► Why Support Then & Now? www.patreon.com/user/about?u=3517018
This is an amazing service you’re providing and a much needed alternative to the School of Lite.
Thank you! Glad you're enjoying
Basically every School of Life video: '[something something] ART'
We *need* some basic philosopher courses in a Brit-ish accent
cuck philosophy also makes great and well-researched videos on mostly postmodernist and marxist philosophy
School of life isn’t terrible but it is kinda ass
EXPLAIN DELEUZE TO ME RIG-
Oh nice. Thanks
Ahahahahahahhaahahahahhahahahaha
lol
good meme
Finally just saw the meme that has enabled me to get this
A life has been spared, that day.
As a PhD student who studies Critical Posthumanism based on Deleuzian ontology I can only say: thank you
nerd
@Cpt.Frost you share epistemological similarities with colonialists and ridiculous people that thinks that socialism is about rationality and to blindly obey the government whatsoever, and other shit like that, I don't
@Cpt.Frost fucking Latin American left, you've been there for a century now and the only thing you managed to achieve is Bolsonaro.. study fucking hell.. study
@Cpt.Frost you really don't know anything about postcolonialism criticism of capitalism, do you? Ok, I've got cacao in my head, still better than believing that feminism has been controlled by the CIA or thinking that real socialism and nationalism go hand by hand, as I can see from your videos that praise murderers on your channel.. Jesus I would hate being you. Have fun
oh jeez what pile of garbage
Seriously changed my life with this video, if you didn't introduce me to Deleuze I'd still be deeply frustrated in search for the language to translate and sher these deeply complex and confusing visions and ideas that I've had but never been able to pin down in language for myself or others, and if I didn't stumble across this last year my direction would be undoubtedly in a different direction in my philosophical journey.
Thank You so much!
Make more videos about Deleuze please!
Coming up soon!
Please do!
@@ThenNow :(
I read Philosophy at a decent University 20 years ago, your content matches the levels of engagement and rigour offered by them. You deserve more credit for your output which is highly engaging and pitches at the right type level to be of interest to a wide audience. What a fabulous resource.
Thank you so much for making this. You're giving sooo valuable insight into thought that is hard to access and understand yet has such radical potential to reshape how we conceptualize everything!
This channel never fails to deliver.
It took me so many re-watches to finally understand the whole video.
Cigol Simons that’s been my entire experience with poststructuralist philosophy
I think it's such a different way of looking at things so it's to be expected. :)
@@timhorton2486 Man, if you, like, don't understand it, like, that's so oppressive of the other - so reductive, totalising and fascist! My favourite piece of philosophy was written by Desmond, a crack and cider addict who lives in the local bus station. I gave him a keyboard and asked him to authentically write his explanation of ontological reality. He tried to eat the keyboard - but I just know what he was saying. I've had that keyboard now for 5 years and I still can't quite grasp Desmond's explanations. I may do a video on it on my channel - it's called Wake Up You Stupid Cunt! This Shit has NO Fuckin' Meaning - and that's it's Point!
Total pleb!
mudpuddlestruck bylightning I’m glad we’ve got geniuses like you out there deciding what does and doesn’t have meaning.
@@timhorton2486 You're welcome, my son. I can make it even simpler - just read 1st rate thinkers and avoid the 3rd and 4th rate and below. There are many 2nd rate tinkers of note that you should think about - and some of them are involved in the perverse dance of bullshittery, that pampered and pretentious people find so fascinating. Just take a tip from science - it's about practical use. If you stuck to real knowledge, you'd know that.
Hi I’m doing my PhD on education ; my area of research is post structuralism.i started reading difference and repetition. I decided to get an understanding so found your channel which I found very useful . Thanks immensely !
It was time for this! Deleuze is too relevant not to have good video essays on his philosophy.
Just some remarks. Deleuze began conceptualizing an ontology of difference rather than identity, but some may argue that he, after Guattari, somewhat changed that to accommodate the multiple, with a new more pluralist ontology of multiplicity. The same goes to understanding Deleuze as a monist, as some people may argue he got further and further from defending unifying conceptual structures beyond the aesthetic, or that his paradox Pluralism = Monism gave a new layer to his position, that couldn't be stated as a monism as it is commonly understood.
And you should have probably used his term "concept" instead of "idea", since they are not equal in his metaphysics.
Glad to finally see a good intro essay on Deleuze here on TH-cam. Keep it up, do A Thousand Plateaus next!
He's right to use idea, since Deleuze bashes "the concept" in this work, before eventually coming back to it in WiP. On the monist point and the change in his thinking, or at least terminology, one of the stranger things is that he gives such pride of place to the concept of univocity in this work, but it entirely vanishes afterwards. I've always puzzled at the changes between his works, ATP unleashes a whole new conceptual apparatus, even if it is motivated by basically the same problems.
@@liledman76 I find that ( paradoxically ?) semantics often gets in the way when one tries to describe ATP's work. It could be argued ( in response on your comment ) that Deleuze idea's on 'The concept' becomes a concept in itself the moment one wants to describe it.
This is what a lot of Bundle Theorists have to say on Spinoza's "substance"
the act of trying to conceiving of an eternal or an infinite gives it a conceptual boundary that is inherently limiting
Yes in a function of determinations of your biology contrasted by the multipicities and assemblages who defy the process of his ontology of biological determinations of l in difference. We can do that for you but that's not what I wanted. Metaphysics is old epistimic systems of causality that fall short of proper causality of ontological processes in difference, these systems of metaphysical ontology were deconstructed by Heidegger. I wouldn't say conceptualizing but actual doing by being-in-the-world while at odds with methods of epistimic, metaphysic systems to fully authenticate your biology, as defined in difference within a process of being-towards-death in ontic formations of the ontological of Dasein. In a way it is similar, at least the one I read, various conceptual frameworks, like heideggerian ontology but easier to understand; however he doesn't relate them in forms of reductive processing in various ontology forms (he shouldn't have to,) but defines the concepts rather than demonstrating the emergence of biological determinations within the difference of repetition ontology. The problem of ontology of multiplication is the inversion of difference in the assemblage and possible worlds of the I in its formation after rejected through difference. And difference can be simply refined by a discharge from repetition of a schedule, not eating 3 times a day, or other programs of being have a schedule within' temporal processes that's in repetition within' systems of ontology that are naturally rejected in difference then synthesized into biological determinations of repetition at odds with difference. Truth is irrelevant and knowledge of things is processed after in difference.
Jeeej, Love the vid. Clearly explained to understand Deleuze and one of his key concept. Can't wait for the nexts!
THANKS.
I´m so indentified with both Spinoza and Kant, and now i fiind Deleuze. I´m sure that i will enjoy read his ideas.
Brilliant! I was looking a few weeks ago for a run down of Deleuze and couldnt find anything. This is perfect, thanks for the excellent video.
I just recently discovered this channel and it has quickly become my favourite phil channel by far. great work!
Thank you! Glad you're enjoying :)
Wow, this has to be the best ever explanation of Deleuze, I am just reading difference and repetition and was looking for a way to understand the basics in plain English first thanks so much really enjoy your programmes.
Still one of the best video essays on Deleuze on TH-cam.
Thank you! I'm reading ATP, and this is exactly the kind of stuff I need to move through it. :) You've helped me a lot.
I truly appreciate your effort, and I wish to find another video for you about this rhizomatous philosopher!
Thank you so much for creating this video. I am a visual artist writing my Masters by Research exegesis, and this overview has really helped me. I would love another on the rhizome as this idea has revolutionised the way I think about the creative process and myself in the world.
A brilliant perspective and explanation of Deleuze's work ! Thank you.
As a sociology student from Turkey, I would like to thank you for this great video :) And now I am waiting for the concept of desire and its relation to object in Deleuze.
I love your channel, and thanks for exploring one of my favourite thinkers. His metaphysics, conscious or not, influenced me through my social science degrees. I want to explore more, but I stopped because I need to explore Kant - and as you wrote, Spinoza. But, don't forget Nietzsche and Bergson.
Also, Deleuze did critique structuralism, even writing a paper on how we recognise structures. His poststructuralism is definitely deeper than those concerned with language. Your section on the Virtual encapsulates this changing structure, the focus on flows, desire, lines of flight, assemblages, and most importantly, the Rhizome, his image of thought that is different to Aristotle's Tree/hierarchal thinking. The Rhizome has no hierarchy, beginning, end, direction, filled with connections that lead to the Actual (I think reflected in the growth of the rhizome, I.e. mushrooms ect.).
What video did you release that led to demonitarisation?
You're great at explaining these complex ideas. Thanks a lot!
What makes this video and in fact the whole channel is the quality of production and the depth of insight with regards the materials.
There are a lot of philosophy channels on TH-cam, they tend to run the gambit between evangelising the host (philosophy tube) or so dumbing down,overly simplifying or worse losing the point of the material(the school of life).
This is a wonderful channel that provides real utility!
This might be my new favorite video of yours. Looking forward to more content on Deleuze. ❤️
Great to hear, thanks!
Thank you very much for this vid! It brought to me a lot of new ideas
extremely wonderful and simple explanation of Deleuze
now I can reread and dive in :)
Great work man
Thank you for the depth and respect for the Seperatio step of the alchemical process
Really poignant balance of content and presentation, between abundance and clarity.
thank u eagerly waiting for a vid on anti Oedipus
SAME
YES PLZ
Same
But why
OMG YES PLEASE
Very interesting! Some concepts mentioned remind me of the buddhist's philosophy of impermanence and emptiness (absence of inherent existence).
I recommend Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamakakarika or Candrakirti's Madhyamakavatara if anyone is interested! :D
this comment made me move into a Zen monastery
@@eccotom1 It's your turn to put the bins out
I'm honestly shocked I could understand even half of that, you're pretty good at explaining stuff XD
You are everywhere, I can't take this any longer. I will erase you from my feed, Meruem-sama
@@AlienFetus my names Mr.Idealist, and do what you must
Best channel on TH-cam 👌👌👌
Ah thank you!
beautiful video!!! making concepts visible such as the "virtual". Amazing, please keep making these videos, You're putting Deleuze on film, making the image speak.
This was a great video. Looking forward to the rest of the series. There are some interesting parallels between Deleuze and Whitehead that may be interesting to explore at some point. Thanks!
Nice. I really enjoyed the slow paced clearly spoken and well-structured content. A lot of hard work has gone into the making of this video. Thanks man.
these videos are honestly fantastic, keep it up dude
Thank you, much appreciated!
Interesting, I never thought of Deleuze’s points like that.
Thanks for this! I stumbled into Deluze and with your help feel like a few things are clicking for me at once!
This greatly helps my understanding of the philosophy of the CCRU.
These videos are so fucking good. Unbelievable how much time, effort and love you put in these videos. Well done, loving it!
Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge in such an accessible way. You are really helping me progress in my degree in Psychology!
So glad I could help :)
Love the pace of this
these vids are great as a way to make sure I understand wtf it is I'm reading-- thanks
A well-composed, brief, and lucid explanation of a profound thinker. I'm happy you are here.
Muito obrigada❤️👏🎶
fantastic video..interesting how you speak so clearly and understand these texts
I am very grateful for this video. I'm starting to read Deleuze and you helped a lot. Greetings from Brazil!
Oi amiguinha compatriota, esse canal tem muitos vídeos bons. Recomendo sobre Foucault também!!
This is brilliant. Thanks for making
Thanks a lot for this enormous explanation of Deleuze!!!
What a fantastic video! Really helped explained Deleuze
It was a great explanation about a very complicated and "hard to understand" philosopher... Thanks!
Thanks for making something impossibly deep relatively simple to understand.
Thank you, Nicholas!
Wow, thanks! Clearly, thoughtfully composed.
I just started reading Delouze and what I got out of it so far is that there is chaos that is a sort of field that is in constant flux, not static, like white noise is all audible frequencies at once and they are all constantly interacting with each other. A sine wave is a repetition, in white noise there is also that sine wave but to isolate it you need to repeat it over time, it needs to stand out. I can see an object because the light repeatedly bounces of the object instead of moving freely in chaos.
When those repeated objects interact with other parts of itself or other objects then you have rhythm, like a flower opening under the sunlight or dozens of muscles, ligaments, nerves and joints working in sync to grab a can of soda.
That is what I got out of it so far but I might be off.
Discovered your channel today - fantastic stuff! Please more Deleuze.
Brilliant. Life changing. Thank you so much.
With these types of videos, my brain cells really appreciate the British accent
G.D. would have remained inaccessible to me without your explanation. Thank you
As good an explanation as I've received it on Deleuze. Thank you!
Can anyone tell me about some concrete examples of how Deleuze's thoughts were practically implemented into anything, such as personal lives, politics, natural sciences, etc.?
this was a pretty faithful and clear overview of the basic "logic" of Delueze... thank you.
I think I got majority of it... brain feels exhausted, overloaded
thanks a lot for the explanation
This is very good
I am beginning to understand Deleuze, thank you so much.
Thanks for the video, explained it so well
Spinoza, Kant...what about Bergson? You might have mentioned this major influence for Deleuze
Marx maybe?
It's very strange to me how TH-cam is demonetizing so many channels all across the spectrum. People like to assume it's only those of particular genres/content, but that's incorrect. It seems to be impacting nearly everybody on this site (aside from, perhaps, the major corporate channels, especially big media companies). Useful as this site has been, it's not a bad idea to start uploading copies to other video platforms as a back-up or laying the groundwork for a future financial alternative.
Just sad to see so many useful channels demonetized for seemingly no good reason.
I think history might look back on Deleuze in 100 years time as the most important philosopher of the 2nd half of the 20th century in opening the gate to new ideas... something I'm trying to write about myself. Glad to have stumbled upon this thinker. He probably already said a lot of what I wish to say.
On Substance vs. Process metaphysics as the temporal aspect of identity and difference, because quite a bit of people first think "temporal" when it comes to difference, equations in physics formalize the process as a non-changing, formal object, abstracting a being out of becoming, still an equation while blurring the line between process and substance, essence and existence, remains a differential structure and the difference defines its identity.
This was really helpful thanks!
Thanks! It 's helped me a lot!
Commenting so I will get more recommendations of this! Amazing content!
Really good explanation!
This is a very nice video ,thanks for sharing your knowledge .
Thanks for watching :)
you are doing an amazing job!
You explained so well, thank you very much!
You're welcome!
Thanks for overview ❤
I would especially appreciate a window into Anti-Oedipus and its connection to May of '68. Thanks!
Really recommend Manuel De Landa's books for an accessible approach to Deleuze that isn't just a "for dummies"
immensely appreciated!
Wow you explain this 100x clearer than truediltom. You're my go to philosophy tuber now, thank you.
Please keep going with Deleuze 🙏 he's an intellectual struggle.
But really what i like about it till this moment is, when you raise a repeating, a difference (as an idea, or a concept) you raise certain value of human's intellectuality, it pushes your mind confidence forward. It praises your ideas. They are maybe not wrong but different, the philosophy of Deleuze recreates human after "human was dead".
But as soon as the human is dead, long live the human.
As soon as the human is alive, long dead the human..
Thank you! Finally a video I can show my friends. One about the body without organs would be awesome :)
Great job. Thank you.
Excellent job on explaining philosophers and their works, you should be a teacher in your career.
Great job!
This video helps me a lot! Thanks!!
Thank you for this knowledge
Well done, thank you.
This Deluze guy seems insanely creative
Please make more videos about this type of more contemporary thinkers, such as Guattari, Agamben, Kristeva, Parisi, please, they're so difficult yet so fascinating… and your videos do help a lot on understanding them better
He is the most important philosopher of all time.
Then and Now, have you ever read Zen philosophy? It's fascinating to me how Deleuze had some crossover with the emphasis that some Zen thinkers place on how thought is an inadequate representation of the ultimate reality we live in. Just something you may want to give a try!
It’s also an old Christian idea that god can’t be approached with knowing but unknowing
Great video!
Great video, it's hard to find good videos about deleuze on youtube
Excellent introduction to Deleuze. It seems that what Deleuze means by "generalization" is "inductive inference" in the philosophical language.
Bergson - nuff said :)
Deleuze is a true intellectual..
Well done, thanks!
Loved the video. Had a question though. If all acts of thought consist of the repetition of the old and the emergence of the new from difference, does that imply that it is possible at some point for thoughts to solely be constituted by repetitions when differences, or the new, restrict subjectivity?