yes, most of them talk without saying anything and never giving a straight answer, they have become experts in verbal judo as not to offend either side.
his argument about the assaulter made no sense. the whole point of pro choice is that the woman gets to decide what to do with the fetus. not another person. the third party assaulter doesn't have any right to the fetus just like he doesn't have any rights to the woman. it's the woman who gets to choose. not the assaulter.
@@universalsorrow And neither does a man get a say in normal circumstances, so remind me why should mean bear all the responsibility, with no say in the matter? Women get all the say, and they don't have to be responsible. Hypocrisy much?
The man used wrong arguements for the wrong question. It's much better to look at abortions not as a fact of killing the unborn baby, but rather as the final decision that was brought to the woman with an unborn child. Why did this happen and why does the woman want to do this? To give birth is not an easy thing to do, so is making the choice of killing the child.
THAT was the best response to that question I've heard to date! Women do need to have that burden relieved and balanced for a change! That might actually change the minds of many women in that position! Love the question of; "A pregnant woman being attacked and the unborn child dies?" Should the attacker be held responsible for that death? YES, of course! Everyone feels the same about that unborn child! Now, apply that emotion to abortion. Wow!
The attacker is held responsible for that death because either the baby is already conscious (say 20 weeks or older) or would be conscious if not for the murder (considering the mother intended to birth him). So if we talk about abortion - prior to 20 weeks the baby is not conscious so should not be considered a sentient being, in this case this argument has no bearing. In relation to the second argument, the assumption is that the mother was intending to birth him. If it could be demonstrably proven that the mother was intending to abort that baby prior to the baby's conscious experience, I don't think the attacker should be held liable to the same degree, only to the degree of perceived probability about the mother's failure of abortion. Hopefully that makes sense. But Vivek definitely makes a much better argument than most conservatives on this issue!
@@Firstname_SurnameSo anyone without consciousness isn’t human? How about we hold people accountable for being irresponsible. Hook up culture is toxic and if a woman can’t bare the responsibility of raising the child then she shouldn’t be having sex and same for the man. A woman typically chooses who she sleeps with, a man has less options therefore the woman has a greater responsibility to choose wisely and be safe. Both should be held accountable but women thinking they should be able to avoid the consequences that come from sex is disgusting. Defying nature will always have consequences.
The unborn victims of violence act refutes what you say and was passed in 2004. " utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."[1]" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unborn_Victims_of_Violence_Act
@@Firstname_Surname I don't think consciousness should make a difference either way. Being wanted or not should not be the basis for whether someone lives or dies. In no other situation that I'm aware of do we humans make so many excuses to avoid voicing the truth, that no matter the stage of development there is a baby growing. In the future, should a woman decide to have a child after aborting, they will always wonder who that older brother or sister might have been and may be haunted by it. Babies are also fully formed, just small, very early (like 9 weeks). Abortions themselves are extremely barbaric. It takes little searching to find out. If a person did the same to a newborn, people would want them shot in a public square, but because we don't see it happen and because we can't hear the screams, it's considered ok.
@@Firstname_Surname- No, they get charged for murder no matter how young the baby is in the womb. Life begins at conception, and that’s basic Science 101. Don’t bother responding, I have my notifications turned off.
Yes.. but for a lot of women, it is easier to kill the unborn baby via abortion than having the baby and then suing for child support from an absent father. Ramaswamy wants to make the second option to become much easier than the first option. Also, to teach women to take responsibility by not opening their legs unprotected to every Tom, Dick and Harry that walks in and then regretting it when they become pregnant.
@@krisrap3828in most states in the union doesn’t the mother have the right to deny the father custody or visitation rights and still sue for child support? The government should not be involved in helping mothers alienate children from their fathers
@@danielprieto4901 Sure. But the fathers don't care. Most of the men are in it for 15 minutes of fun without any commitment. After that, they want nothing to do with the would-be baby or the mother. They just disappear, Mother can sue all she wants but she doesn't get anything. This is why women find abortion to be an easier option. Used to be a time when if you made someone pregnant, you married her. As a result, the number of abortions was very low. That is why the govt needs to get involved to hold fathers accountable to take care of the baby and the mother. Knowing this consequence will also make men think twice before engaging in activities that lead to pregnancy and an abortion.
@@StewartTradee i agree, in that case she should remarry a responsible provider man so the kids grow up with a stepfather and I would have no problem with her getting custody. But do your own research on the family court system and you’ll see government child support enforcement is a racket that has nothing to do with promoting family values.
He wants your vote that's all , he is a Brahmin from india he will never do anything for you. Vivek is on Indian government payroll, his instructions come directly from Indian government they tell him whom to target next students, old people, white collar, blue collor women etc. he has nothing to do with American people. I feel sad for American people because the only one to benefit from his win is Indian government. Vote for your own, never vote for an outsider never!! Inside information of America that India needs - Vivek ➡️ Indian government ➡️ India's grandpa Russia
He wants your vote that's all , he is a Bania Brahmin from india he will never do anything for you. Vivek is on Indian government payroll, his instructions come directly from Indian government they tell him whom to target next students, old people, white collar, blue collor women etc. he has nothing to do with American people. I feel sad for American people because the only one to benefit from his win is Indian government. Vote for your own, never vote for an outsider never!! Inside information of America that India needs - Vivek ➡️ Indian government ➡️ India's grandpa Russia
Wow, what a great answer to the abortion issue. I remember representing a man who was facing felony charges because he hit his pregnant girlfriend. If she was not pregnant the charge would have been a misdemeanor. Before the case was over, she aborted the baby. What a dichotomy.
This guy is WAY too smart to be president. The handlers need someone they can control. He speaks the talking points way too perfectly; if he decides to go rogue you won't be able to control him.
@@Dan-sc7usyour wrong, he’s a smart businessman. That loves our country enough to actually study the history of our culture..You must be a leftist. Hate much?
@@Dan-sc7us No. There's something about his facial expression. It's a veil behind a veil. He doesn't see himself as a conservative or a liberal. He believes himself to be a libertarian or revolutionary that intends to change the status quo.
Men are accountable with a quarter of their income. Will the woman be accountable to the man if he becomes primary caretaker? Will the courts balance child support and take 1/4 a womans wages like they do to men?
Vivek actually said, "financially or otherwise". I'm curious about the "otherwise". Does that mean actions, such as driving the child to daycare or taking them to their doctor's appointments, etc.?
One day people will look back on this time in our history in bewilderment. How anyone can demonize being a supporter of existence.... Of life? It's unfathomable -
Cool. I'm human. I'm alive. You are, too. Do either of us have the right you are wanting a fetus to have? Let's check. What human has the right to an unwilling body when they are not viable? Can you find any?
When a woman is raoed, she doesn’t always know who the perpetrator is. And if she does and he goes to prision, how does he take responsibility for the child?
It's astonishing how many people call themselves pro-life but are really anti-choice. Evil is forcing any husband and wife to raise the children of rapists.
@saleenr6 how are they not held accountable? In the countries where babies are killed by their mothers the most they already have strict penalties for men. Most receive jail time if they don't fork over money for the baby and the mother. Men aren't the reason why women kill their own babies.
Even if it prevents someone’s murder? If someone’s private life involves taking the life of another human, then you’d better be prepared for authorities to rightfully intervene!
“Protection of the life of the mother as an excuse for an abortion is a smoke screen. In my 36 years in pediatric surgery I have never known of one instance where the child had to be aborted to save the mother’s life. . . . If, toward the end of the pregnancy complications arise that threaten the mother’s health, he will take the child by inducing labor or performing a Caesarean section. His intention is still to save the life of both the mother and the baby. The baby will be premature and perhaps immature depending on the length of gestation. Because it has suddenly been taken out of the protective womb, it may encounter threats to its survival. The baby is never willfully destroyed because the mother’s life is in danger.” - Surgeon General C. Everett Koop 1982-1989
I hope he gets to go all the way. I was voting democrat since I was able to vote but since Biden I have changed to independent. I think I found my guy. Let’s see!
@@tboughnou I know he says he not interested in VP. Trump has powerful momentum but Ramaswamy is a powerful astute intellect! If he were VP he could be as influential as Cheney was to Baby Bush. But for MAGA, not for wars, profiigate deficit spending, Patriot lockdowns, mideast chicanery.
Republican party needs to get rid of Ronna McDaniels to start and you are right, Vivek...get back to our principles, morals and values. I just watched the John Adams series for the 10th time. The men of that time were uncompromising on their principles. They had the COURAGE and fortitude to see those principles through.
This dude brings the conversation back to standing for something and uniting the country with some vaguaries! 😂😅 Classic !! He's a good orator I'll give him that!
He has provided very detailed descriptions of how he would proceed with his vision and shares it freely. There are no vagaries **IF** you listen to something more than a few minute clip out of his much longer dialogs. Yes, he is a great orator, the mere fact that he can dive into details and step by step plans and still tie it together with other plans into a comprehensive and rational whole, illustrates the deep levels of thought and application of rigor to his ideas and plans. If you want to talk about "Vagaries" refer to the other candidates... from both sides... Perhaps pay him enough attention to listen to his longer length dialogs before attempting to pass him off with hand waving and platitudes.
I remember Ron Paul made a similar point when he spoke about an incident in a hospital where a mother was about to lose her newborn and everything was done to save that child while, at the same time, in the same building an aborted baby was left crying from a bucket as it died while the medical staff pretended they couldn't hear anything. He said that particular double-incident affected him very deeply.
Vivek is doing all the hard work by meeting people and conducting interviews with people, even the kids in an area, wherever it may be, knowing him and what he is doing. But, the question is, will people vote for him?
Maybe not enough this time to nominate him. But eventually, I think he has the goods to become president if he wants to. And I believe him when he says he's not running for VP. Pundits like Ben Shapiro, whom I like, who say he's not really running for President are wrong. But he may be running for President in 2028, more realistically. I don't think he will take a VP or Secretary position. I think that just hurts him in future races, because it shows he was not telling the truth earlier.
Abortion (disengagement) on demand has to be balanced by a man's right to disengage on demand. Abortion rights advocates need to understand that on this, you can't have you cake and eat in too. A man should not be subject to a woman's government backed whim any more than visa versa. Mutually assured divestment has calmed many problems of the past. Nobody should be made a slave to another's whim, government or otherwise. Primary responsibility resides with the owner/control of the vehicle in question. Disallowing access to use is the primary consideration. Failure to do so is a control issue, ergo responsibility issue. Points to ponder.
he wants your vote that's all , he is a Brahmin from india he will never do anything for you. Vivek is on Indian government payroll, his instructions come directly from Indian government they tell him whom to target next students, old people, white collar, blue collor women etc. he has nothing to do with American people. I feel sad for American people
I totally don't believe his assertion that he has not met a single person in this country who believes that the assaulted mother is not liable. He is lying!
Except when one parent is unfit, both parents should have joint residential custody by default. The model of one parent getting custody and the other parent getting visitation is horribly flawed, and horribly destructive.
Mr. Ramaswamy, we already have laws that force men to support their children. It's called child support and it's enacted in all 50 states and these states cooperate with each other to force child support payments.
I think the biggest thing that would unite the country on the issue of abortion would simply be education. Too many people are somehow not aware of the biological realities of what a fetus is: a distinct, living, human organism only differing from a newborn or a toddler or a teenager or an elderly person by the stage of development it is at in its life cycle. To cut that short at any point is clearly killing a human being.
the unborn are every bit human life as is the mother and further as the unborn are innocent human life, they are deserving of protection of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness ...
In people's mind if it's an embryo or fetus it's not the same as a full born baby. They even go as far as saying every time you ejaculate you kill millions. I try to counter that by saying that once it's an embryo or fetus, if has pretty much won the lottery of life -- it is very likely to be born compared to a mere ejaculation. The further in you go in the lottery of life, the more you deserve to live. However, there's a major chance, close to ~30%, that up to about 10 weeks the baby doesn't make it, so abortion up until 10 weeks is not that bad (back to the lottery of life meaning luck is still needed for the baby to actually be born).
I think most humans both intuitively and practically give moral value to beings based on sentience. So a fetus prior to conscious experience shouldn't be considered as having moral value. I believe the abortion topic is as incendiary as it is because of religious beliefs which are not necessarily grounded in consistent moral values.
@@Firstname_Surname right, which is crazy because a baby at the 4-month term is very likely to be born, I believe 98%+ chance at this point, so it WILL be sentient very soon!
We are all going to die though.. that fact doesn't make it OK to kill anyone. - If a child is born with a condition where they have a 90% chance of dying before their first birthday are you saying it needs to be OK for a parent to "humanely" euthanize the child? - You're picking stats to fit a narrative. By 6 weeks the odds of the unborn child dying are 9.4%. By 10 weeks it's less than 1%. So your odds would dictate that abortion should definitely be illegal after 6 weeks. - Supporting an abortion ban after 10 weeks means that you have a fundamental disagreement with Roe v Wade.
Though, I am European and have no possibility of voting, and if I could would doubt between DeSantis or Ramaswamy; The answer that is given here hits right on the spot and avoids the arbitrary nature of policy making based on the feelings of groups of people / majority rule.
He is so awesome 👏👏 👏 👏 may God keep blessing him and his family, praying in Jesus name for all those that stand for our Christian values, morals for this country USA 🇺🇸 🧎♀️🙌
Still deciding between Vivek and Trump? Here's my analysis: 1. Vivek has a brilliant understanding of constitution and laws. Trump failed his first term because he got duped by the "experts". Trump is yet to acknowledge his shortcomings. 2. Vivek has a stronger connection and collaboration with the younger generation. As a self-made entrepreneur and author of multiple books, Vivek can inspire more young people as a role-model. Most of the younger generation tends to vote Democratic - which proves Trump has failed in bringing the youth so far. 3. Vivek is more well-read, well-spoken and intelligent than Trump: His approach is more unifying and more relatable to both sides as seen in his podcasts and conflicts with protesters. Trump's approach is more crude and divisive, which is not good when we are this close to a civil war. 4. Vivek is self-funded, which allows his to speak on issues like eminent domain, removing affirmative action, etc. Trump is beholden by his donor class (Super PACs), who have invested a lot of money in Trump's legal cases and campaign - they will demand a "return" later. 5. Vivek is promising to shut down corrupt government agencies. Trump is advocating a new building for FBI, notice the difference? 6. Vivek is more energetic (almost 350 events last year, hundreds of virtual summits and podcasts). Trump is very old almost 80 (managed 30 events last year)..which is a magnitude of 10 TIMES the output. The legal fights have and will continue to drain Trump further. 7. Vivek will not play the 'victim card' his campaign is based off his gratitude. Trump's campaign (and his supporters) want vengeance, which is why their entire strategy is about playing victim. 8. There is a good chance that Trump will go to jail before elections. If that happens, it would not just embarrass Republicans, the entire country would be subject to ridicule. Vivek will be attacked as well, but he has a stronger background to fight back and he leaves less room for mistakes especially when it comes to rhetoric, the guy is a master magician with words. Vivek wins at virtually at every level of analysis. Just my 2c
Trump gets a high from trolling the left. Now I think it’s hilarious!! And I also think it’s ridiculous that so many people rank personality traits anywhere close to POLICIES POLICIES and POLICIES. However, one needs to be strategic and realize that millions of people obviously will sway their vote if someone is a “Mean man” regardless of whether it affects policies one iota. Therefore you gotta go with Vivek. Millions of people who won’t vote for Trump JUST because of his abrasive personality will vote for Vivek.
Probably the only policy i disagree with. Everyone mind their own and stay out of other people's business. I dont tell anyone else what to do with their body and i expect the same.
The baby inside the mothers womb is NOT her body. Also, there are many law that make it a crime for any of us to randomly punch other people. So yes, there are many laws out there which tell us what we can and can't do with our bodies.
@@hunterh7026 Who’s minding the life of the child in her womb? Shouldn’t we be protecting and giving a voice to the most vulnerable? What if we took the same approach in the past to slave owners? “Mind your own and stay out of other peoples business.” Doesn’t sound very compassionate or forward thinking when you think of it that way.
I question the discernment of the public. After listening to this man, how could they even attend a Nicky Haley or Ron Disantis meeting? How gullible are these people? Majority is not necessarily always right.
I would add Mike Lee and numerous others to that list. Lee may not be a presidential candidate but he is constantly touted as a constitutional expert. Meanwhile back at the ranch, he was aiming at social media companies with both barrels one year and did a remarkable “about face” the next when Twitter announced construction of a massive new facility in Utah, (Lee’s home state.) The list of of measures he has voted against, purely to be an obstructionist, is shameful. I’m 💯 for cutting wasteful spending, this isn’t that. In twelve years, the man hasn’t introduced a single piece of meaningful legislation, but come election year, Utahns are reminded that their senator is a constitutional expert who has connections to the right people in Washington ………and that’s all they need to hear. That’s the problem with every city and every state in America and I’m afraid that until something seriously breaks, nothing will change.
Does anyone know if his wife (Apoorva) agrees with his statements on abortion? I noticed she declined to add anything at the end, and I've never heard her address the issue.
Let’s stop telling women “no, you can’t have your tubes tied or have them removed because you’re too young and you might change your mind about whether or not you want a child or more children” this happened to me, my best friend and several other women I know in addition to countless women I’ve spoken with online.
No one ever talks about vasectomies for men or tubals for women. Both can be reversed. If you want to have casual sex with strangers and don’t want to get pregnant why is abortion the only suggestion? I would rather tax funded sterilization than using tax money to kill babies.
Then don't get an effing abortion! Easy, breezy, beautiful covergirl. We should not have to fund abortions. I am not in favor in banning first-trimester (or other extenuating circumstances) abortions. But trying to legislate this away is a losing battle. I am not in favor of law upon law. Everyone who gets an abortion or performs them has to deal with whatever karma is generated. I have never believed in abortion. Thankfully my eggs are dried up so having an unwanted pregnancy is not an issue for me now. But unwanted pregnancies occur all the time. Adoption is not necessarily a good option. The child sex-trafficking industry is part and parcel with adoptions, orphanages, etc. The soul cannot be destroyed. If an embryo gets aborted, it might be better than a child being raped three times a day by his adoptive parents. But the best thing of all is being conscious in life--especially when having sex. Realize the immense potential result of your actions. What I despise the most about pro-abortionists is how cavalier they are about it. That's just satanic.
he wants your vote that's all , he is a Brahmin from india he will never do anything for you. Vivek is on Indian government payroll, his instructions come directly from Indian government they tell him whom to target next students, old people, white collar, blue collor women etc. he has nothing to do with American people. I feel sad for American people
On the surface, that sounds good, but in truth men are already held accountable for the caring of children they father. The issue is that most of the time when the 2 aren't married, they have to provide support but get little to no say in how the child is raised. That's a bigger issue and I think it isn't particularly helpful to state something that is already the law as if it's a new thought. If the intention is to make that burden even heavier for men in this country, I'm not a supporter of it. Custody law and child-support laws heavily favor women and often punish men. They don't need to be made "extra." They need to be made fair.
Participating in risky activities is not proof of irresponsible behavior. Some people just enjoy intimacy. Or sky diving. Maybe you just hate freedom my dude.
@@freedomishavingachoice3020 A man cannot kill his unborn child because he enjoys intimacy and doesn't wanna be a parent. A woman shouldn't be able to either
@@freedomishavingachoice3020 It's not refusal it's killing... if you refuse to use your body to bring your unwanted newborn or toddler to a safe haven and they die because you left them home alone to go on a vacation then you have not just refused to use your body you have killed them. Agree? Abortion kills a human being. If a woman and her partner create a new human being and put that human being in a position of dependence on her then they absolutely need to be RESPONSIBLE and ensure the safety of their young offspring.
Much as I agree with the pro-life philosophy, the truth is also that women will always get abortions, just like they always have done. So outlawing abortion has similar problems to outlawing drugs.
He’s a Saint Xavier grad. and still holds onto Christian values. So live and let live should be the American and universal motto for life. The Holy Bible, Lord Jesus Christ, The Author of Life “I am The Way, The Truth and The Life”. Everything else is from the devil.
might be a good answer for that argument. is "are you happy with your life? are you somewhat thankful that you were born and experience all sorts of things?" you wouldn't be here today if we made abortion legal/accessible
Vivek!!! What kind of answer is that?!! “We need to change the law to codify sexual responsibility for men by making them legally financially liable for their offspring”?!!!! WTF?!! That already IS the case for men!!! How about changing the law to give men rights to their unborn children (which they DON’T currently have!)?!!! If pregnancy takes TWO to happen, then it takes TWO to decide to terminate it!!! Why the hell do women get to kill a man’s unborn child (without his consent) as a matter of her convenience after she chose to create a life by having sex with him?!!!
It’s takes two spark the creation of life, but one person is really dealing with the in and outs of the pregnancy. The guy is not getting fat, tired, or giving birth. The baby is growing from the mother nutrients, using the mother energy. If baby were placed in pod, outside of the body, then you would have an relevant argument.
@@Dan-sc7us The embryo is a distinct body on its own, with a unique genetic code, different both from its father and its mother. It's not part of the woman's body like her organs or her muscles etc. It resides inside the woman's body and uses it as a host until it is developed enough to survive on its own outside of it. If I'm allowed the expression, it "parasitizes" in a way inside the woman until it's ready to be born.
@@deoxlogius I really don't care about your biology class! The fetus cannot survive without the mother's body! The fetus can also kill the mother's body, or cause serious illness! It is up to the mother to decide what to do with that fetus, not the government!!
No doubt that “unborn life is life” but what is your truth about abortion Vivek? He skirted around but never gave an answer. Instead he blabbered on about “Men’s Rights” and hinted at prosecuting women for “assault”. He should have just said that he doesn’t know the answer. He’s a joke.
Do we really need the Wikipedia explanation of killing a human life? Sexual responsibility for men and women. Abortion is a nice term to use so you don’t have to say you are killing human life, whatever stage of life it may be in.
Sex is pleasurable, but our desire to separate it from consequences and the responsibility that comes with it has created a vapid culture where men never grow up, and women are constantly used as sex toys.
India has the best Abortion laws. US should adopt our "Medical termination of pregnancy MTP act". The most reasonable act which protects both mother and baby
Vivek: You might add the argument that not enough pregnant women are aware of the fact that an abortion can affect their future fertility. I am not as opposed to abortion as you are. BUT I appreciate your stance, your viewpoint and your (at the VERY least, partial) solution.
Not only do I agree with him, but I love hearing a politician actually answering the question they're asking.
Why do you hate women and freedom so much that you want the government to force people to give birth against their will?
yes, most of them talk without saying anything and never giving a straight answer, they have become experts in verbal judo as not to offend either side.
his argument about the assaulter made no sense. the whole point of pro choice is that the woman gets to decide what to do with the fetus. not another person. the third party assaulter doesn't have any right to the fetus just like he doesn't have any rights to the woman. it's the woman who gets to choose. not the assaulter.
@@universalsorrow And neither does a man get a say in normal circumstances, so remind me why should mean bear all the responsibility, with no say in the matter? Women get all the say, and they don't have to be responsible.
Hypocrisy much?
The man used wrong arguements for the wrong question. It's much better to look at abortions not as a fact of killing the unborn baby, but rather as the final decision that was brought to the woman with an unborn child. Why did this happen and why does the woman want to do this? To give birth is not an easy thing to do, so is making the choice of killing the child.
He is correct , I agree , it is a very complicated issue.
The issue. No.
The politics. Yes.
Awesome speech. Love to hear his ideas. He's not afraid to talk it out...
We need him in government. He tells the truth.
Which Is why he can’t be in government
you think truth tellers havnt already tried? anytime someone not playing their games gets any traction some "scandal" breaks out
No He doesnt.
@allstarmar15235...It's called grooming but he isn't anointed of God to be our next President. President.....
He lies like a rug
THAT was the best response to that question I've heard to date!
Women do need to have that burden relieved and balanced for a change! That might actually change the minds of many women in that position!
Love the question of; "A pregnant woman being attacked and the unborn child dies?" Should the attacker be held responsible for that death?
YES, of course! Everyone feels the same about that unborn child! Now, apply that emotion to abortion. Wow!
The attacker is held responsible for that death because either the baby is already conscious (say 20 weeks or older) or would be conscious if not for the murder (considering the mother intended to birth him).
So if we talk about abortion - prior to 20 weeks the baby is not conscious so should not be considered a sentient being, in this case this argument has no bearing.
In relation to the second argument, the assumption is that the mother was intending to birth him. If it could be demonstrably proven that the mother was intending to abort that baby prior to the baby's conscious experience, I don't think the attacker should be held liable to the same degree, only to the degree of perceived probability about the mother's failure of abortion.
Hopefully that makes sense. But Vivek definitely makes a much better argument than most conservatives on this issue!
@@Firstname_SurnameSo anyone without consciousness isn’t human?
How about we hold people accountable for being irresponsible.
Hook up culture is toxic and if a woman can’t bare the responsibility of raising the child then she shouldn’t be having sex and same for the man.
A woman typically chooses who she sleeps with, a man has less options therefore the woman has a greater responsibility to choose wisely and be safe.
Both should be held accountable but women thinking they should be able to avoid the consequences that come from sex is disgusting.
Defying nature will always have consequences.
The unborn victims of violence act refutes what you say and was passed in 2004. " utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."[1]"
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unborn_Victims_of_Violence_Act
@@Firstname_Surname
I don't think consciousness should make a difference either way. Being wanted or not should not be the basis for whether someone lives or dies.
In no other situation that I'm aware of do we humans make so many excuses to avoid voicing the truth, that no matter the stage of development there is a baby growing. In the future, should a woman decide to have a child after aborting, they will always wonder who that older brother or sister might have been and may be haunted by it.
Babies are also fully formed, just small, very early (like 9 weeks). Abortions themselves are extremely barbaric. It takes little searching to find out. If a person did the same to a newborn, people would want them shot in a public square, but because we don't see it happen and because we can't hear the screams, it's considered ok.
@@Firstname_Surname- No, they get charged for murder no matter how young the baby is in the womb. Life begins at conception, and that’s basic Science 101. Don’t bother responding, I have my notifications turned off.
Vivek Ramaswamy True Leader👍👍
Vivek Ramaswamy POTUS 2024 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
Speaking of "holding the man responsible", Isn't child support suit already a thing?
Yes.. but for a lot of women, it is easier to kill the unborn baby via abortion than having the baby and then suing for child support from an absent father. Ramaswamy wants to make the second option to become much easier than the first option. Also, to teach women to take responsibility by not opening their legs unprotected to every Tom, Dick and Harry that walks in and then regretting it when they become pregnant.
@@krisrap3828in most states in the union doesn’t the mother have the right to deny the father custody or visitation rights and still sue for child support? The government should not be involved in helping mothers alienate children from their fathers
@@danielprieto4901 Sure. But the fathers don't care. Most of the men are in it for 15 minutes of fun without any commitment. After that, they want nothing to do with the would-be baby or the mother. They just disappear, Mother can sue all she wants but she doesn't get anything. This is why women find abortion to be an easier option. Used to be a time when if you made someone pregnant, you married her. As a result, the number of abortions was very low. That is why the govt needs to get involved to hold fathers accountable to take care of the baby and the mother. Knowing this consequence will also make men think twice before engaging in activities that lead to pregnancy and an abortion.
@@StewartTradee i agree, in that case she should remarry a responsible provider man so the kids grow up with a stepfather and I would have no problem with her getting custody. But do your own research on the family court system and you’ll see government child support enforcement is a racket that has nothing to do with promoting family values.
@danielprieto4901 or...hear me out. Maybe raising a child on one income should be possible for everyone.
Everytime i hear him i feel like im learning something😂
you are just being brainwashed
He wants your vote that's all , he is a Brahmin from india he will never do anything for you. Vivek is on Indian government payroll, his instructions come directly from Indian government they tell him whom to target next students, old people, white collar, blue collor women etc. he has nothing to do with American people. I feel sad for American people because the only one to benefit from his win is Indian government. Vote for your own, never vote for an outsider never!! Inside information of America that India needs - Vivek ➡️ Indian government ➡️ India's grandpa Russia
@@bintykala686touch grass, overthinking demoncrat.
I love how he's willing to stand for his principles
He wants your vote that's all , he is a Bania Brahmin from india he will never do anything for you. Vivek is on Indian government payroll, his instructions come directly from Indian government they tell him whom to target next students, old people, white collar, blue collor women etc. he has nothing to do with American people. I feel sad for American people because the only one to benefit from his win is Indian government. Vote for your own, never vote for an outsider never!! Inside information of America that India needs - Vivek ➡️ Indian government ➡️ India's grandpa Russia
Just like President Trump EXCEPT Vivek Ramaswamy and Nikki Haley are CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE to be President or Vice President
This is the kind of response that is changing my mind... and compels my support.
Wow, what a great answer to the abortion issue. I remember representing a man who was facing felony charges because he hit his pregnant girlfriend. If she was not pregnant the charge would have been a misdemeanor. Before the case was over, she aborted the baby. What a dichotomy.
D*mn. Why can’t other politicians be upfront and answer question like this? Love him or hate him, he has a sharp mind. Love this guy.
This guy is WAY too smart to be president. The handlers need someone they can control. He speaks the talking points way too perfectly; if he decides to go rogue you won't be able to control him.
No, he's just a fast talking huckster, who got rich investing in drugs that don't work!
@@Dan-sc7usyour wrong, he’s a smart businessman. That loves our country enough to actually study the history of our culture..You must be a leftist. Hate much?
@@Dan-sc7us fake news
@@Dan-sc7us No. There's something about his facial expression. It's a veil behind a veil. He doesn't see himself as a conservative or a liberal. He believes himself to be a libertarian or revolutionary that intends to change the status quo.
@@brekiarnz161 that is another way of saying MAGA 😉
That's very interesting! Rather than allow men to bail on pregnant women, hold them accountable for the baby's well-being. I like it.
Wait isn't that already the case? Women can apply for child support if the bio father bails out and relinquishes his legal rights to children
@@samuraijosh1595 Good point. Maybe not such an interesting comment he made.
Men are accountable with a quarter of their income. Will the woman be accountable to the man if he becomes primary caretaker? Will the courts balance child support and take 1/4 a womans wages like they do to men?
Vivek actually said, "financially or otherwise". I'm curious about the "otherwise". Does that mean actions, such as driving the child to daycare or taking them to their doctor's appointments, etc.?
so women can put the baby up for adoption and shes free but men have to be enslaved for 18 years. That's bllsht.
❤Ramaswamy Revolution!❤
God Bless you Vivek 🙏
He is answering the question. :)
None of the politicians would do so.
One day people will look back on this time in our history in bewilderment. How anyone can demonize being a supporter of existence.... Of life?
It's unfathomable -
One day is the judgement day we all face upon our death. I would not like to be a person who supported abortion.
“So grandpa, the liberals thought there were 100 different genders? Were they okay?” 😂
But yet are willing to take their lives after birth! Amazing hypocrisy!
@@A-Concerned-CitizenKilling children is not a right.
It's much more important to be a supporter of freedom (ask the gun lobby)!!
Vivek says, "Unborn life is life, and there is no compromising on that principle." Vivek for president 2024!!!
Cool. I'm human. I'm alive. You are, too. Do either of us have the right you are wanting a fetus to have? Let's check.
What human has the right to an unwilling body when they are not viable? Can you find any?
And he's wrong. Leave our daughters alone. Not a suggestion
@@rensinclair4218 unborn daughters deserve a chance too.
"Unborn life is life" YES 👌👋👍
When a woman is raoed, she doesn’t always know who the perpetrator is. And if she does and he goes to prision, how does he take responsibility for the child?
It's astonishing that people would be anti life and proud of it. Evil walks amounts us.
Agreed.
It's astonishing how many people call themselves pro-life but are really anti-choice. Evil is forcing any husband and wife to raise the children of rapists.
@JohnJohnson67851 what's your policy for murder? Under 6 weeks okay or not at all?
don't worry if men will be held accountable there won't be any pregnancies
@saleenr6 how are they not held accountable? In the countries where babies are killed by their mothers the most they already have strict penalties for men. Most receive jail time if they don't fork over money for the baby and the mother. Men aren't the reason why women kill their own babies.
Men need to just stop talking, period. I'll never vote for anyone who butts into the private lives of Americans.
Even if it prevents someone’s murder? If someone’s private life involves taking the life of another human, then you’d better be prepared for authorities to rightfully intervene!
I'm pro choice, but if you're pregnant, it seems to me that you have already made the "choice " of what to do with your body.
but thats just blatantly not true ahahah...
@@fwnifwYou need to grow up.
Go tell that to Hamas
As a woman, I say the same! I had MANY choices to make along the path to pregnancy! Once pregnant, the "choice" has been made.
your gender has nothing to do with it@@BitsyBee
My right ear really enjoyed this video, Forbes.
This man tells the truth and must be pulling the levers of power in some serious way, Trump, get this man in your cabinet when you're back in office.
my sentiments exactly! VP, then Prez in 2028. Maybe humanity CAN SURVIVE?
Bravo
“Protection of the life of the mother as an excuse for an abortion is a smoke screen. In my 36 years in pediatric surgery I have never known of one instance where the child had to be aborted to save the mother’s life. . . . If, toward the end of the pregnancy complications arise that threaten the mother’s health, he will take the child by inducing labor or performing a Caesarean section. His intention is still to save the life of both the mother and the baby. The baby will be premature and perhaps immature depending on the length of gestation. Because it has suddenly been taken out of the protective womb, it may encounter threats to its survival. The baby is never willfully destroyed because the mother’s life is in danger.” - Surgeon General C. Everett Koop 1982-1989
So good! They are all choosing to be willfully blind.
I hope he gets to go all the way. I was voting democrat since I was able to vote but since Biden I have changed to independent. I think I found my guy. Let’s see!
his policies align so much with Trumps'... I say let him at it for 2028
@@tboughnou I know he says he not interested in VP. Trump has powerful momentum but Ramaswamy is a powerful astute intellect! If he were VP he could be as influential as Cheney was to Baby Bush. But for MAGA, not for wars, profiigate deficit spending, Patriot lockdowns, mideast chicanery.
He's amazing !!
Republican party needs to get rid of Ronna McDaniels to start and you are right, Vivek...get back to our principles, morals and values. I just watched the John Adams series for the 10th time. The men of that time were uncompromising on their principles. They had the COURAGE and fortitude to see those principles through.
This dude brings the conversation back to standing for something and uniting the country with some vaguaries! 😂😅 Classic !! He's a good orator I'll give him that!
He has provided very detailed descriptions of how he would proceed with his vision and shares it freely. There are no vagaries **IF** you listen to something more than a few minute clip out of his much longer dialogs. Yes, he is a great orator, the mere fact that he can dive into details and step by step plans and still tie it together with other plans into a comprehensive and rational whole, illustrates the deep levels of thought and application of rigor to his ideas and plans. If you want to talk about "Vagaries" refer to the other candidates... from both sides... Perhaps pay him enough attention to listen to his longer length dialogs before attempting to pass him off with hand waving and platitudes.
I remember Ron Paul made a similar point when he spoke about an incident in a hospital where a mother was about to lose her newborn and everything was done to save that child while, at the same time, in the same building an aborted baby was left crying from a bucket as it died while the medical staff pretended they couldn't hear anything. He said that particular double-incident affected him very deeply.
No seeds no tree! No babies no human race!
No liberals, no personhood?
@ no liberals no bad society!😊
Mr. Ramaswamy is incredible good. Mr. Ramaswamy for President.
Vivek is doing all the hard work by meeting people and conducting interviews with people, even the kids in an area, wherever it may be, knowing him and what he is doing. But, the question is, will people vote for him?
Maybe not enough this time to nominate him. But eventually, I think he has the goods to become president if he wants to. And I believe him when he says he's not running for VP. Pundits like Ben Shapiro, whom I like, who say he's not really running for President are wrong. But he may be running for President in 2028, more realistically. I don't think he will take a VP or Secretary position. I think that just hurts him in future races, because it shows he was not telling the truth earlier.
Yes. Given half a chance. If they can get over the TSD, the Trump is our Saviour Delusion. !😅
I said above - the "majority' are having trouble visualing checking the box "Ramaswamy." I'm so dissapointed he came in 4th. I stand behinf him!
behind
Abortion (disengagement) on demand has to be balanced by a man's right to disengage on demand. Abortion rights advocates need to understand that on this, you can't have you cake and eat in too. A man should not be subject to a woman's government backed whim any more than visa versa. Mutually assured divestment has calmed many problems of the past. Nobody should be made a slave to another's whim, government or otherwise. Primary responsibility resides with the owner/control of the vehicle in question. Disallowing access to use is the primary consideration. Failure to do so is a control issue, ergo responsibility issue. Points to ponder.
Truth!
What's the truth about abortion? . . . then launches a long non-answer.
Um don’t we already do this? If a woman gets pregnant, she can get child support from the father. So what’s the new proposal??
The father is not currently responsible. He can walk away. VR is demanding responsibility.
I am indigenous Montagnard Jarai Bahanar American citizens he will have my vote
God is REAL
I speak the TRUTH
Let's stand for the Truth
Vote " yes" for TRUTH
he wants your vote that's all , he is a Brahmin from india he will never do anything for you. Vivek is on Indian government payroll, his instructions come directly from Indian government they tell him whom to target next students, old people, white collar, blue collor women etc. he has nothing to do with American people. I feel sad for American people
Finally!
Why is you tube now putting these “leftist” context boxes up
It's called fact.
@@DriveInFreak I can come to my own conclusions pal …..you let others do it for you if you so desire
I totally don't believe his assertion that he has not met a single person in this country who believes that the assaulted mother is not liable. He is lying!
Except when one parent is unfit, both parents should have joint residential custody by default. The model of one parent getting custody and the other parent getting visitation is horribly flawed, and horribly destructive.
Mr. Ramaswamy, we already have laws that force men to support their children. It's called child support and it's enacted in all 50 states and these states cooperate with each other to force child support payments.
I think the biggest thing that would unite the country on the issue of abortion would simply be education. Too many people are somehow not aware of the biological realities of what a fetus is: a distinct, living, human organism only differing from a newborn or a toddler or a teenager or an elderly person by the stage of development it is at in its life cycle. To cut that short at any point is clearly killing a human being.
the unborn are every bit human life as is the mother and further as the unborn are innocent human life, they are deserving of protection of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness ...
Nonsense
@@rensinclair4218 Explain....
@@rensinclair4218
strong and decisive....he should get there
In people's mind if it's an embryo or fetus it's not the same as a full born baby. They even go as far as saying every time you ejaculate you kill millions. I try to counter that by saying that once it's an embryo or fetus, if has pretty much won the lottery of life -- it is very likely to be born compared to a mere ejaculation. The further in you go in the lottery of life, the more you deserve to live. However, there's a major chance, close to ~30%, that up to about 10 weeks the baby doesn't make it, so abortion up until 10 weeks is not that bad (back to the lottery of life meaning luck is still needed for the baby to actually be born).
I think most humans both intuitively and practically give moral value to beings based on sentience. So a fetus prior to conscious experience shouldn't be considered as having moral value. I believe the abortion topic is as incendiary as it is because of religious beliefs which are not necessarily grounded in consistent moral values.
@@Firstname_Surname right, which is crazy because a baby at the 4-month term is very likely to be born, I believe 98%+ chance at this point, so it WILL be sentient very soon!
We are all going to die though.. that fact doesn't make it OK to kill anyone.
- If a child is born with a condition where they have a 90% chance of dying before their first birthday are you saying it needs to be OK for a parent to "humanely" euthanize the child?
- You're picking stats to fit a narrative. By 6 weeks the odds of the unborn child dying are 9.4%. By 10 weeks it's less than 1%. So your odds would dictate that abortion should definitely be illegal after 6 weeks.
- Supporting an abortion ban after 10 weeks means that you have a fundamental disagreement with Roe v Wade.
@first even 30% is a lot to anyone who knows math technically anything more than zero should be considered in my book @@danypell2517
@@danypell2517 yes, I think sentience begins around month 5
This is one of MANY reasons Im voting for Vivek.
His invasive bullshit?
Amen no compromising ! All life matters
Though, I am European and have no possibility of voting, and if I could would doubt between DeSantis or Ramaswamy; The answer that is given here hits right on the spot and avoids the arbitrary nature of policy making based on the feelings of groups of people / majority rule.
This guy is right on. By far the best candidate. Edit: former candidate. Unfortunately.
❤Great answer
FREE WILL 😇
He is so awesome 👏👏 👏 👏 may God keep blessing him and his family, praying in Jesus name for all those that stand for our Christian values, morals for this country USA 🇺🇸 🧎♀️🙌
Such BS. We have child support laws already. 🤷
Still deciding between Vivek and Trump? Here's my analysis:
1. Vivek has a brilliant understanding of constitution and laws. Trump failed his first term because he got duped by the "experts". Trump is yet to acknowledge his shortcomings.
2. Vivek has a stronger connection and collaboration with the younger generation. As a self-made entrepreneur and author of multiple books, Vivek can inspire more young people as a role-model. Most of the younger generation tends to vote Democratic - which proves Trump has failed in bringing the youth so far.
3. Vivek is more well-read, well-spoken and intelligent than Trump: His approach is more unifying and more relatable to both sides as seen in his podcasts and conflicts with protesters. Trump's approach is more crude and divisive, which is not good when we are this close to a civil war.
4. Vivek is self-funded, which allows his to speak on issues like eminent domain, removing affirmative action, etc. Trump is beholden by his donor class (Super PACs), who have invested a lot of money in Trump's legal cases and campaign - they will demand a "return" later.
5. Vivek is promising to shut down corrupt government agencies. Trump is advocating a new building for FBI, notice the difference?
6. Vivek is more energetic (almost 350 events last year, hundreds of virtual summits and podcasts). Trump is very old almost 80 (managed 30 events last year)..which is a magnitude of 10 TIMES the output. The legal fights have and will continue to drain Trump further.
7. Vivek will not play the 'victim card' his campaign is based off his gratitude. Trump's campaign (and his supporters) want vengeance, which is why their entire strategy is about playing victim.
8. There is a good chance that Trump will go to jail before elections. If that happens, it would not just embarrass Republicans, the entire country would be subject to ridicule. Vivek will be attacked as well, but he has a stronger background to fight back and he leaves less room for mistakes especially when it comes to rhetoric, the guy is a master magician with words.
Vivek wins at virtually at every level of analysis. Just my 2c
Trump gets a high from trolling the left. Now I think it’s hilarious!! And I also think it’s ridiculous that so many people rank personality traits anywhere close to POLICIES POLICIES and POLICIES. However, one needs to be strategic and realize that millions of people obviously will sway their vote if someone is a “Mean man” regardless of whether it affects policies one iota. Therefore you gotta go with Vivek. Millions of people who won’t vote for Trump JUST because of his abrasive personality will vote for Vivek.
We need agencies. Stop acting like you pay shit. You don't.
Clever guy ...America is not ready for an intelligent president
It starts with moral values and taking responsibility :) so true!
Anyone else have no audio to these Forbes Vivek videos?
Amen, Amen, Amen!!!!
It's a baby.
No, it's a fetus in the eyes of the law! It has no constitutional rights!
No it's not, nor is that bullshit a valid excuse for the government forcing people to give birth against their will.
Vivek 2024! 🇺🇸 2.0
Probably the only policy i disagree with. Everyone mind their own and stay out of other people's business. I dont tell anyone else what to do with their body and i expect the same.
Your right to do what with your body
@@b.melakail does it matter? Its not yours.
The baby inside the mothers womb is NOT her body. Also, there are many law that make it a crime for any of us to randomly punch other people. So yes, there are many laws out there which tell us what we can and can't do with our bodies.
@@MarkDiSciullo mind your own. It affects her, not you.
@@hunterh7026 Who’s minding the life of the child in her womb? Shouldn’t we be protecting and giving a voice to the most vulnerable?
What if we took the same approach in the past to slave owners? “Mind your own and stay out of other peoples business.”
Doesn’t sound very compassionate or forward thinking when you think of it that way.
I question the discernment of the public. After listening to this man, how could they even
attend a Nicky Haley or Ron Disantis meeting? How gullible are these people? Majority is not necessarily always right.
I would add Mike Lee and numerous others to that list. Lee may not be a presidential candidate but he is constantly touted as a constitutional expert. Meanwhile back at the ranch, he was aiming at social media companies with both barrels one year and did a remarkable “about face” the next when Twitter announced construction of a massive new facility in Utah, (Lee’s home state.) The list of of measures he has voted against, purely to be an obstructionist, is shameful. I’m 💯 for cutting wasteful spending, this isn’t that. In twelve years, the man hasn’t introduced a single piece of meaningful legislation, but come election year, Utahns are reminded that their senator is a constitutional expert who has connections to the right people in Washington ………and that’s all they need to hear. That’s the problem with every city and every state in America and I’m afraid that until something seriously breaks, nothing will change.
Does anyone know if his wife (Apoorva) agrees with his statements on abortion? I noticed she declined to add anything at the end, and I've never heard her address the issue.
Lol she has 2 sons and also said she wanted 1 more child and hopefully a girl so ofc she supports vivek in this
Vivek 2024.
Wow, what a great argument for Pro-life.
Let’s stop telling women “no, you can’t have your tubes tied or have them removed because you’re too young and you might change your mind about whether or not you want a child or more children” this happened to me, my best friend and several other women I know in addition to countless women I’ve spoken with online.
the party of 1776 with the ideas of 1776... that's correct!
I was conceived during the Geneva conference
Very well put. What do the Republicans stand for. They all need to be on the same page not trashing each other. My opinion
Shows that republicans have minds of their own and aren't sheep.
@@mathildeyoung1823 most republicans are part of the UNIparty CLUB. We need to delete and restart Gov't.
Who would not want him as president? If 2024 doesnt work out, i hope he continues to persue the position.
No one ever talks about vasectomies for men or tubals for women. Both can be reversed. If you want to have casual sex with strangers and don’t want to get pregnant why is abortion the only suggestion? I would rather tax funded sterilization than using tax money to kill babies.
Then don't get an effing abortion! Easy, breezy, beautiful covergirl. We should not have to fund abortions. I am not in favor in banning first-trimester (or other extenuating circumstances) abortions. But trying to legislate this away is a losing battle. I am not in favor of law upon law. Everyone who gets an abortion or performs them has to deal with whatever karma is generated. I have never believed in abortion. Thankfully my eggs are dried up so having an unwanted pregnancy is not an issue for me now. But unwanted pregnancies occur all the time. Adoption is not necessarily a good option. The child sex-trafficking industry is part and parcel with adoptions, orphanages, etc. The soul cannot be destroyed. If an embryo gets aborted, it might be better than a child being raped three times a day by his adoptive parents. But the best thing of all is being conscious in life--especially when having sex. Realize the immense potential result of your actions. What I despise the most about pro-abortionists is how cavalier they are about it. That's just satanic.
Vasectomies cannot always be reversed. There is a chance that it is not reversable.
Vasectomies cannot be reversed. So please try something else.
And you are the present day margaret sanger
Nobody is killing babies, however forced birth laws kill women.
this is right hand audio only. please convert it to mono instead of unbalanced stereo.
Trump and Vivek will be an unstoppable force of good in this world. We have good days ahead
I want the GOV out of this. It is up to the Woman & Husband &/or Partner...."PERIOD".
it shouldn't be up to anyone to kill their unborn child to make their life easier. PERIOD
Im sold, im voting for Vivek
We're the party of the Constitution but almost all of the politicians are not.
I hope Trump picks him for vice president and then he becomes president in 2028😊😊
he wants your vote that's all , he is a Brahmin from india he will never do anything for you. Vivek is on Indian government payroll, his instructions come directly from Indian government they tell him whom to target next students, old people, white collar, blue collor women etc. he has nothing to do with American people. I feel sad for American people
On the surface, that sounds good, but in truth men are already held accountable for the caring of children they father. The issue is that most of the time when the 2 aren't married, they have to provide support but get little to no say in how the child is raised. That's a bigger issue and I think it isn't particularly helpful to state something that is already the law as if it's a new thought. If the intention is to make that burden even heavier for men in this country, I'm not a supporter of it. Custody law and child-support laws heavily favor women and often punish men. They don't need to be made "extra." They need to be made fair.
Vivek 2024
never will irresponsible individuals, from the hook-up generation, concede their behavior of uncontrolled fornication
Participating in risky activities is not proof of irresponsible behavior. Some people just enjoy intimacy. Or sky diving. Maybe you just hate freedom my dude.
@@freedomishavingachoice3020 A man cannot kill his unborn child because he enjoys intimacy and doesn't wanna be a parent. A woman shouldn't be able to either
@mathildeyoung1823 if refusal of your body to the not viable qualifies as killing , you're a criminal. Go to jail, I guess?
@@freedomishavingachoice3020 It's not refusal it's killing... if you refuse to use your body to bring your unwanted newborn or toddler to a safe haven and they die because you left them home alone to go on a vacation then you have not just refused to use your body you have killed them. Agree? Abortion kills a human being. If a woman and her partner create a new human being and put that human being in a position of dependence on her then they absolutely need to be RESPONSIBLE and ensure the safety of their young offspring.
Gotta agree. Unborn children are still alive.
Much as I agree with the pro-life philosophy, the truth is also that women will always get abortions, just like they always have done. So outlawing abortion has similar problems to outlawing drugs.
He’s a Saint Xavier grad. and still holds onto Christian values. So live and let live should be the American and universal motto for life. The Holy Bible, Lord Jesus Christ, The Author of Life “I am The Way, The Truth and The Life”. Everything else is from the devil.
Video is muted... and my volume isn't the problem................
might be a good answer for that argument. is "are you happy with your life? are you somewhat thankful that you were born and experience all sorts of things?" you wouldn't be here today if we made abortion legal/accessible
Vivek!!! What kind of answer is that?!! “We need to change the law to codify sexual responsibility for men by making them legally financially liable for their offspring”?!!!! WTF?!! That already IS the case for men!!! How about changing the law to give men rights to their unborn children (which they DON’T currently have!)?!!! If pregnancy takes TWO to happen, then it takes TWO to decide to terminate it!!! Why the hell do women get to kill a man’s unborn child (without his consent) as a matter of her convenience after she chose to create a life by having sex with him?!!!
I certainly agree with your view. Men should be given equal responsibility for the unborn child. It takes TWO to create a life.
It's the WOMAN'S body! Period!
It’s takes two spark the creation of life, but one person is really dealing with the in and outs of the pregnancy. The guy is not getting fat, tired, or giving birth. The baby is growing from the mother nutrients, using the mother energy. If baby were placed in pod, outside of the body, then you would have an relevant argument.
@@Dan-sc7us The embryo is a distinct body on its own, with a unique genetic code, different both from its father and its mother. It's not part of the woman's body like her organs or her muscles etc. It resides inside the woman's body and uses it as a host until it is developed enough to survive on its own outside of it. If I'm allowed the expression, it "parasitizes" in a way inside the woman until it's ready to be born.
@@deoxlogius I really don't care about your biology class! The fetus cannot survive without the mother's body! The fetus can also kill the mother's body, or cause serious illness! It is up to the mother to decide what to do with that fetus, not the government!!
Who's the woman standing next to him?
Vivek 🇺🇸
No doubt that “unborn life is life” but what is your truth about abortion Vivek?
He skirted around but never gave an answer. Instead he blabbered on about “Men’s Rights” and hinted at prosecuting women for “assault”. He should have just said that he doesn’t know the answer.
He’s a joke.
Do we really need the Wikipedia explanation of killing a human life? Sexual responsibility for men and women. Abortion is a nice term to use so you don’t have to say you are killing human life, whatever stage of life it may be in.
God is ❤️
❤️ is GOD
The great universe is ment for life.
Stop killing the innocents.
Christofascist much?
Sex is pleasurable, but our desire to separate it from consequences and the responsibility that comes with it has created a vapid culture where men never grow up, and women are constantly used as sex toys.
India has the best Abortion laws. US should adopt our "Medical termination of pregnancy MTP act". The most reasonable act which protects both mother and baby
Which goes upto 26 weeks and beyond ??? Great what shitty laws. 😅
And the father? No mention of father, you say both mother and baby as if they're the only parties to this.
Vivek: You might add the argument that not enough pregnant women are aware of the fact that an abortion can affect their future fertility.
I am not as opposed to abortion as you are.
BUT
I appreciate your stance, your viewpoint and your (at the VERY least, partial) solution.