AUSA 2018: Oshkosh FMTV A2 variant and HET update

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @Slim_Slid
    @Slim_Slid 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    370 HP? A 3126/C-7 is only rated for 330 HP Max and the 3116 & 3126/C-7 come at 170 HP for the M35A3 and M109A4 (Only 3116) and it was the same for the FMTV's.

  • @connortb1229
    @connortb1229 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This would look so sexy as a gun truck. Just cover it in guns and armour, roofless in the back. Worst case you can jump out. 2 .50 cal miniguns a 20mm cannon. 40mm grenade launcher. Were missing this type of vehicle and historically they have worked really well and our enemys use them very well.

    • @matovicmmilan
      @matovicmmilan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Connor Massingham
      I think the miniguns are in 7.62mm and in 20mm but anyway the gun trucks and technicals are my kind of stuff!We made and used them very effectively in war.
      Used different types of trucks like TAM 110 or the larger TAM 150 with welded steel armor often under angle.
      Weapons included quad .50 cals, recoilless rifles, triple 20mm, anti-aircraft 30mm and even 57mm rocket pods from MiG-21...perhaps only our enemies utilised them more during their invasion of Vietnam.

  • @lordemarsh6804
    @lordemarsh6804 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    3:05 really looks like a school bus... 🤣

    • @kosh9639
      @kosh9639 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like the FMTV Chassis, Box & the Front-end..
      The Cab is looks like 80's Garbage.. but, probably Protects good. (Like angled door skins)
      Same with the JLTV.. $300,000?? No thanks..
      How about $50k to $75k-- Engine, Trans & Rolling Chassis.. xD
      (The other thing is: The JLTV is A Tactical Vehicle.. Not an Infantry vehicle.. Getting out probably Suckz )

  • @alexblake5743
    @alexblake5743 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I like the old solid axle model better.

    • @the_bmx_tim2815
      @the_bmx_tim2815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was sold on this A2 when they mentioned smoother handling. The solid axle A1P2 is a rough ride when you are in the back haha 😅

  • @iamthesupremeleader
    @iamthesupremeleader 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ground clearance looks terrible

  • @Limescale12
    @Limescale12 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    No ground clearance

  • @yackson4804
    @yackson4804 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The ground clearance looks worse

  • @1moderntalking1
    @1moderntalking1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    pulling Abrams at 80 tons is a joke...the abrams is already overweight as it was.

  • @zaczhang1094
    @zaczhang1094 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s getting uglier & uglier; A2 looks like you put different scrappes together & tape it with gorilla tape.

  • @constellation35
    @constellation35 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This are the worst looking us Army trucks. that nose is just adding extra weight without any use. they really need to fix that cub

  • @mccormick-livingstonedayot2542
    @mccormick-livingstonedayot2542 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ugliest TRUCK in US MILITARY HISTORY. . They're Both Oshkosh and AM GEN ugliest design

    • @brendarizo3172
      @brendarizo3172 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Ok then let see you make a truck that actually looks “nice”