Detectives Track Down A Secret Child Murderer | The Prosecutors |
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มี.ค. 2024
- Prosecutors delves into the US judicial system from the viewpoint of the prosecutors who work the cases. Each episode reveals the behind-the-scenes story of some of Americas most notorious cases.
It’s a brand new true crime podcast, and the lead detective is YOU! Click on this link to check out COLD TAPES.
coldtapes.com/?Rea...
Make sure you subscribe to get your regular crime fix: / realcrime
Any queries, please contact us at:
owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
#truecrime #realcrime #crime - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
the coroner who claimed it was pneumonia should lose his license and a lawsuit filed against him! what a lousy unreliable doctor!
I agree 100%. That coroner never wanted to do his work, just took a shortcut.
Qqqqqq 😊@@Aleka1943
😅😅
I agree
@@Aleka1943iii
Whenever there is so much hate and rejection towards a baby its best to not let the father have contact at all. The chance of something like this here happening is to big. So very sad for little Renee, RIP.
Russians are trying to get to oil
Russo
@@Hannah_The_Elon_Jew
What's "Russo" mean???
This coming summer a father will go on trial for shooting and killing his three young sons. Search here for the bodycam footage of the police when they got to the house. I don't remember his name.
That's true but most times the father goes for visitation through the court system not because they have any love for the child, but to despite the mother, and judges lack of ethical understanding goes by law
Renee's Grandmother, and Detective Dietrich are Heroes, fighting for Renee'.
ABSOLUTELY, WELL SAID HUN 👏🏽 👍🏾 ❤
@@nireland1742 good morning. Thank you!
The young girl on the witness stand said Renee was murdered by the dad was the best
I wonder if she saw him ‘hug’ her 😢 and couldn’t process it.
She was repeating what she's heard
@@sweetcocoa She heard right, smart girl
What a beautiful child Renee is
Anyone that can take the life of an innocent child deserves to be in prison for life.
Oh ya!
That sentence will either be very short or very lonely.... Either way, perfect!
Yes
Lower than Subhuman 😢
@@JSWolfethat’s a ton murdered human life you have on your hands… really no remorse for that many murders?
To lose one wife is misfortune, to lose three in mysterious circumstances is.................very suspicious...
Is…….very, guilty.
Ah,a twist on the old parent line…
He's a serial killer.
That is so sad that the father didn't have any love but only hate for his little girl. Then killed her. That is so sick. And I can't believe that a father could do something like that. God has her now and she will be love.
A mother or father are both capable. Sadly. The ones I know, are ALL at getting back at their spouse. 😢
If there is actually such a thing. It’s never been proven, which makes it more sad and fucked up.
@@MissChrissyM1wow
Money 🤑💰
@@MissChrissyM1 It's been proven, he's locked up.
Bravery is a strange thing, we all have an understanding that it involves some physical danger. However, how brave is a mother who lost a child at 17 months going to the autopsy of another child of the same age? I’d be amazed if she didn’t go home and weep that night.
In my experience, when you lose a child, there’s a part of you that never stops weeping
It's so sad that a MONSTER could take the life of such a precious and beautiful child
And not have any remorse. And some arrogant lawyer acting like he should not be in prison.
😘😋✌
In addition, he murdered his three wives! He does not stop!
Isn't that crazy? Forget justice, to the attorney it's all about winning. I know he was guilty, but they didn't have enough evidence???
The lawyer was just doing his job. Or do you want to suggest that some people don't deserve a fair trial?
If they can't afford a lawyer the Court appoints one for them . These lawyers have no choice but to try and defend the criminals even if they know they client is guilty.
Finally, a truly satisfying conclusion. Both these men are forced to face the consequences of their actions.
What a Precious , Little Baby! She was Defenseless, and Helpless! My heart goes out to her Heartbroken Family.🥀🥀🥀💔💔💔🙏🙏🙏🕊️🕊️🕊️
Why capitalize almost everything?
@@Flamsterettewhat a strange thing to comment on
@@shannilmerrill426 What a strange thing to NOT comment on, you mean.
²²
1
@@carolinelynn4381 What?
Thank God for Justice!
I am he got life in prison. How he could murder three wives is disgusting. He will never see the light.of day.
Emelita was scamming him for a green card, leaving her child with him so she could go out and party.
What a monster💩💔🤬
I can’t imagine how much pain there would be to loose a child
My parents lost two. I remember them, but only vaguely.
Lose
And it doesn't matter whether the lost child is an actual child or an adult, it's still the same
@@denisemoore6134 same, how many siblings do you have?
@@denisemoore6134I am sorry .
Such a Beautiful Baby! So Heart Shattering!💔💔💔💔🙏🙏🙏🙏🥀🥀🥀🥀🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️
How the first autopsy missed a murder is beyond me. That’s their one job is it homicide or natural causes.
Either intensionally, unqualified or they just didn’t do their jobs which either way is sickening.
Incompetence its disgusting
Sloppy work by coroner
I am so disgusted that he killed a 2 year old child 😢😢
I don’t know how most defence attorneys sleep at night!
Takes a certain personality type to choose that career.One must remember that innocent people are at times charged with crimes,so defence lawyers are essential for a fair judicial system.
@@trishaprett7721 Quite right. The defense attorney's job is to ensure a fair trial. That means overcoming emotional biases in the jury and reminding them when evidence is circumstantial rather than hard. It can sometimes mean pointing out flaws in an investigation or even misconduct by the prosecutor. If you're a court appointed attorney (thus an attorney working for the DA), this can involve pointing such out about your coworkers or even *boss.*
My brother-in-law studied to be an attorney and was involved in defending someone in a case where the evidence was badly handled and the defense wasn't even allowed to see the evidence in person before the trial. I found out about it because I'm trained as a commercial artist and my brother-in-law wanted to know if there was any chance of enhancing this photo of a knife so he could figure out what the trademark was. I said the photo sucked, like it'd been taken at the lowest resolution with no attempt at focusing in poor lighting.
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Agree! They are evil !
@@juulclark2651 You really believe no one is ever innocent and they don't have a right to a defense?
I hope his cellmate finds out what he did, true prison justice will come
Unless he is sharing with another Wife killer.They can share their gruesome stories.
😊😊😊😊😊@@trishaprett7721
😊😊
guaranteed Inmates hate sex and child abusers I worked as an RN in jail and prison we have to separate them…of course sometimes we make mistakes
They always do
I dont believe Mr. Goud cared about his daughter and he did manipulate a heafty financial gain. Disguisting . Evil selfish and greedy man. Be careful who you trust. Poor Renee she didnt have much of a chance. Its sickening how the father staged this horror in fromt of the little kids at Grandpas too. So sad. Thank goodness he is locked up I personally see this as a capital case. But at least hes locked up and years later confessed. My condolences to all the good people who loved Renee and shes in Heaven now not suffering. Youll see her again .
What does tuat mean?
The niece and her energy! She said “Don’t play with me”. 💪🏼
I simply don't understand how any father could kill his own child for ANY reason... let alone financial. 😠
Sadly it happens alot especially with custody stuff
Agreed. Horrible!
Many many fathers love money more than their childten.
Chris Watts did
It's a bit unusual that it was the father. It tends to be the mother when it's for financial gain, or out of spite.
Jack dug a large hole when they went camping?? How Scary that would be!
🤦♀️😔
I just cannot fathom how someone can kill a child. It’s beyond my understanding.
Mrrder of a child, for 50K??? This is SO wrong!
Yes, wrong for any amount of money. Small hands can change the world. The poor little darling wasn't even given the chance to show the world what she could do
Innocent defenseless kids are the victims of broken marriages
Divorce is between both spouses,
But innocent childrens has to pay for their sins..😢
Really satisfying to watch, great detective work .Really well made, thank you!
Except that the first autopsy missed the cause of death that evil sob should have been put in prison then..not have had any amount of freedom..just so sad..she was a child who wasn't sick or anything..guess it just maks no sense at all
Thank you for this. I'm in Wisconsin and I'm so upset with this case. Found a blanket but no 3 year old Elijah.
What is the most ridiculous thing is he said his first wife killed herself because she was torn between two men. That sounds like an egotistical thought only he could have. A woman has two guys who want to love her? She's not killing herself over that.
Bad enough an adult is murdered but children can’t defend them and have no evil in them like some adults
The lady detective deserves a medal especially as she lost her own beloved child
Poor little angel. The first medical examiners were incompetent.
The case was completely circumstantial .
My Deepest Sympathy to Emilita 's Family, especially her Son.💔💔💔🥀🥀🥀🙏🙏🙏🕊️🕊️🕊️
Seeing Renee' s Casket is so Very Sad! Poor Innocent Baby!💔💔💔
Big casket for a little baby.
Why should he pay child support on a kid he didn’t want?
@@AmyStuffingsits the law. If you cause it's existence you pay for it. If you don't want one you keep it in your pants.
@AmyStuffings If he didn't "want" a child, he shouldn't have had unprotected sex. They had the child together. Why should he get away with helping , and leave the mum with everything?! How old are you? He partook in the "fun", he can help with the result🙄
@@trishmcl9055 the large silver part on the outside was a covering for the little white coffin.
If you read the book, it says Renee did not want to go and they saw her crying her heart out while he drove away with her in the car.
I don’t understand why the first autopsy didn’t find anything.
They didn’t do it properly.
@@pinklion2237If they even did it at all.
Because they did a sh*tty job.
Good afternoon, and Thank You! Excellent channel!
It was the father wasn’t it
Certainly was. Revenge. 😢
Bit slow.
38:05 ...what a brave and "smart" little girl. At her young age, no one is gonna pull the wool over her eyes! God bless her little heart! 🙏
Not one tear as the coroner demonstrated how her death began. Remember that it took her a little while to die! Poor baby 😞 suffered! What a monster!
Thanks for updating ❤
Law Enforcement, and Prosecutors, Thank You for your Service! 🙏🙏🙏💙💙💙🚔🚔🚔
Makes me sick defense attorney talking about winning. There is no winning sir
Doctoring evidence is stupid . Adding that word , “not “ , was wrong .
@@BlackStump172she should really have either,got him to initial it,or added a note explaining that she (the older girl) was still asleep.
It’s a game to them, not real life. They lack a basic level of empathy. It’s disgusting really. These are people’s lives.
@Katiee0592 it's what they have to do. They have to build a solid defense for the defendant so that the trial is fair. There's a lot of innocent people that get locked up due to defense lawyers that don't take their jobs seriously.
Technically speaking there really WASN'T enough evidence to convict the dad for life in prison. The only evidence was the second autopsy which only told us that a homicide occurred.
The problem with this is that the second autopsy occurred after 8 months of decomposition. The second autopsy was also only observed by the Doctor preforming the autopsy and the detective building a case against the dad, so there could be bias due to the detective being in the room. It's also difficult to determine which autopsy yielded correct results. To say the first autopsy was done incorrectly discredits the first technician. This would also discredit other autopsies that they have preformed. This could mean all autopsies preformed by that first technician are now questionable.
Besides this, there is unfortunately no other evidence. If the victim had ended using a crossed arm technique they proposed, then there would have to be skin cells from the attackers arms on the victims shirt.
In addition to this, there was no evidence of a struggle or skin cells under the nails or anything on the victim. If everyone else was sleeping, this would mean the victim didn't scream or alert anyone while she was being attacked. She was only 2 so a struggle would not been successful but a struggle would still occur. Also, no bones were broken. A child's ribcage is very fragile, it would be difficult to not break a bone using the cross arm technique that was proposed to end the victim.
The evidence that was presented in court were all charater statements given by people that don't like him, an officer and a child. Obviously the ex wife will have a negative charater statement. The police officer saying his crying was fake is an opinion, this is presumably the first time the officer met him so he cannot definitely say he was fake crying when he does not know how that man would grief. Children are impressionable, if everyone is saying he did it then the child will say it as well especially if they do not know who did it.
All this to say, unfortunately this case should have been thrown out. The prosecution presented no evidence that points to the dad being responsible. They also tampered with his previous statement which isn't a good look. Using charater statements to direct the jury to a guilty verdict instead of collecting actual evidence is horrendous. I'm not saying he is not guilty but this is a horrible case. If the first autopsy was correct and the child passed during the night then an innocent man was just imprisoned for life.
@@Kolazola No, this isn’t necessary. They don’t have to make up grossly far fetched nonsense to defend their clients. Combating the facts presented by the prosecution and offering a defensive perspective that aligns with reality and evidence is one thing. This is making a mockery of our court and justice systems.
So who IS qualified to say if someone is faking it. I would think police, paramedics, nurses etc would be. They have observed grief more then anyone.
34:54 The officer was simply telling the court what he saw and what his initial impressions were. He wasn't claiming to be a psychologist or a mind reader. He never said he knew for certain that the father was faking. He just said that, in his opinion, the father's behavior didn't appear genuine. That's all. Any half decent defense attorney wouldn't get so rattled or "offended" by someone giving their opinion.
And it's the defense attorney's job to remind the jury that the officer is *not* "a psychologist or a mind reader," and so not qualified to say for certain. While the officer *did* qualify his statement with "seemed" and "my opinion," it's easy for people to ignore those parts. The attorney would feel "offended" that a non-expert opinion like that would be allowed into consideration. After all, his job is to ensure the defendant gets a fair trial. A job that's already difficult because of the nature of the crime.
@@brigidtheirish Considering the defendant eventually admitted to the crime, we now know for a fact that the officer's impression was spot on accurate. For justice to prevail, juries need as much truthful information, relevant to the case, as possible.. including the honest impressions and observations of first responders. The responding police officer simply stated what he saw as it appeared to him. It would have been dishonest of him to leave out the part of the story in which the father behaved in an over the top and theatrical manner. Most of us prefer our police officers to be observant.
Only in a totally corrupt and morally bankrupt society is the purpose of a defense attorney to prevent murderers from facing justice. In a healthy society with a truly just justice system, truth and justice are the shared goals of both sides of the court room. Unfortunately, in western countries, truth and justice are CLEARLY NOT factors in our justice systems. Although both sides can be guilty of this disgusting behavior, it's become the expected standard for defense attorneys.
@@yankeetherebel Yes. But that couldn't be said for certain at the time of the trial. The defense attorney was doing his job trying to ensure only strictly factual, non-prejudicial evidence was presented to the jury for consideration.
@@brigidtheirish If the defense attorneys only presented information that was strictly factual (provable), I would agree with you. However... For the vast majority of cases, including this one, defense teams build their whole defense around entirely made-up hypothetical theories that are so incredibly outlandish that juries rarely consider them to be within the realm of possibility or reason (aka reasonable doubt). In fact, if the defense attorney wants to play the "offended" game, he should know that it's probably offensive to assume that jurors are stupid enough to buy into their nonsense.
@@yankeetherebel How do you know that it's the "vast majority of cases" and what about this case was built about "entirely made-up hypothetical theories that are so incredibly outlandish that juries rarely consider them to be within the realm of possibility or reason?"
Poor siblings too, to go through this and see
As a bereaved mother myself, I cannot understand any parent having something to do with ending their own child's life. 😢😢😢😢😢
It makes me sick.
God forgive him...
So sorry for your loss. 🙏🏽
No , God will not forgive him , unless he actually repents . That does not seem likely .
He will go through the same pain in his next life...
Karmic debts...
Why God forgive him?
Sorry for your loss ❤
Insufficient evidence!?She had internal bleeding!& tons of red flags.A healthy child does NOT go to sleep & die of their abdomen being crushed! And they are trying to use the 1st autopsy when it wasnt even throughly or done correctly. 1+1=2 this "dad" is 100% guilty!!
Why is the father the beneficiary of the insurance if he did not want the child?
She died at a visit with him... and he paid the policy.
The insurance company wouldn’t know he didn’t want the child. As he paid the policy he gets the money.
Can we please get over the notion that men who initially don't want a child to be his that he is going to be a bad father. plenty of men get trapped into raising other men's children and few want children via a mate they don't get along with.
@@DK-Coffee if someone is a bad father to one child they are a bad father to that child… doesn’t matter if he’s good to other kids he’s a bad father in that situation…
@@diosalanegra1958 no idea what you are commenting on . As I never made comments excusing him being bad to the one. But he didn't want to be stick paying for her to a hostile ex
I would like to know "if" there was the same insurance on all of his children.
He was a sorry excuse for a father
Honestly as a mother of 5 children my oldest being 28 and my youngest being 2 weeks old, if something happened to one of them, i dont think i could live without them.. 😢
28 and 2 weeks? Are these your biological children?
Did the police at the time really think the first wife had shot herself in the chest with a shotgun, Now I'm not police or a detective or forensic or even someone that does autopsy's
But I know for a bloody fact you can't shoot yourself in the chest with a shotgun unless you've rigged some contraption up, were they really that stupid, her arms would have had to have been like 6 feet long for her to shoot herself with a shotgun in her chest, it's impossible without help of some kind
And why on earth did they destroy the evidence, they shouldn't destroy evidence for at least 100 years or so ( I think ) especially now we know how fast forensics can progress
'Custody visit' these courts have a lot to answer for.
Narcissistic people don’t believe in abandoned relationships he is a sociopath
That lady should have listened to him he said he didnt want a baby. She should have took that baby and raised her herself. Noway i would allow a guy to be around my child, who said he didnt want anything to do with the baby.
That's my opinion too 👍
Neither would I .
She wanted child support money. She by choosing that ensured his right to visitation. You can't demand money to raise a child and not let them see the child without a solid reason.
He shouldn't have gotten her pregnant if he didn't want a baby
@@Joelswinger34 she knew he didn't want the child, she did. Why shouldn't she be required to pay the bills herself or give the baby up for adoption?
In Ireland there is a Law that prevents a child under 12 yrs being insured. I had an agent that lied to me about this and collected money every week. I discovered she could not be insured and stopped the payments. The agent had been a neighbour when growing up but when I married and moved a few miles out of town he somehow got in touch and set me on the path to insure my child.
Serial killer
In a criminal justice system that operates properly, you don't compensate weak evidence with more lenient sentencing.
Is it better to lose the case and they get off? A good example of appropriately using a plea deal is a cold case, little evidence, 15 years have passed. Det go back and talk to people again , and one person gives them a name, saying yea this person did it . But all evidence is circumstantial, give 20 year plea and the person gets out in 10-12. Not worth losing the case after all that time and the family going thru the agony of trial. Happens all the time. But if that person interviewed had told cops the perps name 15 years earlier, theyd prob get a life without parole. My point is, weak evidence is a very legit reason for lesser sentences
@@kenw2225 If the evidence is insufficient, then people should get off. You think about this with hindsight. The usual reason people "get off" because of a lack of evidence is that they're innocent. I know you're quite happy with plea deals in the US. We're not quite as keen on it, as it increases the risk that innocents are convicted.
@@danhanqvist4237 yet this man confessed. the doctor who did the second autopsy found concrete evidence of blood in parts of muscles where it shouldn't of been. thats pretty concrete and proves murder. the original doctor didn't check the Lower back of this young girl because this type of suffocating is not usual and doctors probably rarely ever see it. most ppl are suffocated by the throat. this father is extra disgusting considering he had to hatch the plan to suffocate his daughter in a more unrevealing way.
the second doctor is just as credible if not more because he checked the entire body. he knew it was murder. and it what brought this man to justice. the first doctor seemed to be just checking off boxes more of just doing his job type of autopsy. the old bag didn't check this child as thoroughly as he acts like he did. also the law is full of loopholes. murderers get let off all the time, from simple mistakes that the defense will exploit. the entire point of a lawyer. to manipulate the justice system to get what they want. what your talking about is some sort of morally perfect justice system that doesn't even exist in reality. you know it and I know it so its ether your just fishing for attention or your stupid and don't understand the law at all. the law is far from perfect and as we see everyday. drug dealers get 10+ years and a child rapist gets off in 3 years and just has to file as a child predator. or someone getting 25 years for 2nd degree murder and someone getting 10 for pre planed intentional murder. the verdict of the law depends on many things, the different ppl in the jury have different experiences and no matter what will always have some sort of bias based on personal life experience. the lawyers can exploit different loopholes for different crimes. or maybe the judge just didn't get his dick sucked that night. then you better watch out.
I certainly would not have wanted to be on that jury in this first case
Gotta' love this title....Detectives track down a SECRET child killer...are there other kinds🤪😎
Wow that doctor is intelligent! In my next lifetime hopefully I'll marry a man like that.
Me too 😅
Second episode . The guy is an animal...after murdering his first wife, he wae still able look at her bleeding body. Lazy policing twice.
I watch a lot of true crime stories and it breaks my heart when one parent is convicted of murdering the other and leaves the child (children) an orphan. That to me is the saddest part 😢
In the Good (?) case, the evidence really didn't support a conviction (at least not as presented in the film). Luckily, the father confessed.
Narcissist always destroy themselves
I agree and know a few
RIP Renee and 🙏🙏🙏🙏to the family. What a monster to kill that gorgeous wee girl it breaks my heart. Thoughts from Ireland 🇮🇪
Why did they not get it right first time round?
Because they weren't looking for signs of murder.
the original doctor didn't check the Lower back of this young girl because this type of suffocating is not usual and doctors probably rarely ever see it. most ppl are suffocated by the throat. this father is extra disgusting considering he had to hatch the plan to suffocate his daughter in a more unrevealing way.
the second doctor who performed the second autopsy checked the entire body.(passionate) he knew it was murder. and its what brought this man to justice. the first doctor seemed to be just checking off boxes more of just doing his job type of autopsy. the old bag didn't check this child as thoroughly as he acts like he did. there's a difference when your invested and passionate about your work, the first old bag who performed the first autopsy is probably way passed his passion for the job and it was most likely to him, just another body, just another day of work. you can see this day to day with normal police, some treat ppl innocent until proven guilty like the law should be upheld, (passionate) while other police are just doing a job, harass and give our unlawful tickets and make unlawful arrest. just to be that star on paper with a extra ordinary quota. ( 0 passion just a job)
Really seriously makes me think autopsies should be overseen, the first doctor would have let the murderer go!!!
The actor playing Jack Reeves showed emotions ranging from deadpan to nearly catatonic.
That's why i love America and other civilized country that works on human rights. If it's in my country Nigeria or entire African countries as whole, this case will go cold and the killer will go Scott free with murder. The authorities will not even look into the matter talkless of going to court and if you eventually drag the suspect to court. He or she will still go Scott free especially when the culprit is rich or have a rich back ground
Having a sick child is one of the most stressful periods of a persons life then having
3 wives murdered just beacuse they needed a better life without him very very tragic may their souls continue resting in peace.
A bear hug forceably can lock and brake bone and tissue of a child easily even the way that he hold the child before the medic arrive he did not give up the child quickly.😢😢😢😢😮😮.
But didn't she also inquire about getting life insurance on her daughter. The Mother
Inquiring and getting are two different things. He actually got it ,she didnt.
The girlfriend enquired,about her own children,because she wanted to find out if he’d taken one out,on a child(Renee).I do wish people would listen.She pretended she wanted one,to get the agent to tell her what she wanted to know.
Its normal to get life insurance on kids when born in some families.
@@DK-Coffee Most financial planners advise their clients not to buy children’s life insurance, unless the child was born with a medical condition that will make it unlikely they’ll be able to qualify for life insurance in the future, or they’ll pass away prematurely from the condition. It would be better to open an account where interest can be earned, that the child can access at age 18.
I can’t believe how many people are unaliving children! I’ve watched 3 documentaries tonight and wow
They buried her in a child's coffin but when they dug her up for the 2nd autopsy the coffin had grown to adult size.
Child’s coffin shown was a re-enactment. The larger was actual video of it being brought up.
I bet as soon as the investigation was closed he(the dad) thought that's when he claimed the life insurence.
That guy that killed the little girl wouldn't have lasted a year in prison!
So why would he not have a policy on the other kids??
Because he wasn't going to kill the other kids
He didn’t want her to begin with .. so he figured he could gain financially as well
Didn't he say something about having a couple of thousand on them through his work policy?
That’s a huge casket for a toddler.
Mail order bride ? WTF ....
I don't understand why the social worker got off so easy...that sure showed me how corrupt the legal system for the kids failed to protect them. That's just wrong and should of been brought to the attention of everyone in the USA!!!
Why would someone kill her and take the baby car seat,if the husband had noting to do with her death??..🙄
Shame on her sons for condeming her without absolute proof.
Maybe they knew otherwise. I wish her happiness in the future.
2oyrs is alot to make up for. May she know she is believed & loved by many.
Is this a show that was on TV in the 90s?
Watching this I was hoping they would uncover natural cause .. guess it’s just un fathomable that any parent could harm their children.. this is so wrong and anyone convicted should never see the light of day again!!!!!
Good work 👏👏👏
Its a cruel world. Maybe this is hell and the good bit is when we die. Who knows. Hope so. 🙏
Thank you Real Crime
He should have got the death penalty. I wanted to know what was in that letter that he wrote Renee’s mom. I just wanna know if it happened exactly like everyone thought it did. I can’t imagine finding my kid making my other child call 911 and then do nothing to try to save her life and then not even to hand her over to the paramedics. He did that case he knew she was long dead and passed beyond the point of saving. That’s the only thing that makes sense. I can’t wrap my head around it. I wonder how the lawyer felt after he learned that he did exactly what he was accused of doing. Cause he tried to defend the indifendibile and he tried to get a convicted child killer of his own child no less set free. But I wish he would have got the death penalty but that’s to easy for him. I wonder if he made any friends especially after they learned he killed his own daughter! So life works. I feel bad for the mother. I don’t understand how he’s been divorced before and he sees his daughters from that marriage every weekend he pays child support for them every month. So , he’s not the kind of sociopath that only luvs the kids if he luvs the mother because he’s been divorced and still cared for his daughters. If he thought she wasn’t his ok, and the paternity test said she is. So why luv 2 daughters and not 3 it doesn’t make any sense. He let his daughters and niece find that baby dead! I can’t even imagine what that did to them psychologically at there young ages. Even his own niece at 9 years old knew he did it so he must have treated her way way different than he did them at least enough that it was noticeable to a child. Did the grandfather notice anything? If ur a woman and ur kids father doesn’t wanna be a father then just take ur kid and walk away. Don’t ask for child support and don’t give visitation. Take the kid and walk away. Any man who doesn’t want a kid will never care for them as a parent should. These kids born to dads who don’t want them r the highest risk for abuse, sex abuse and homicide. It’s not worth it and then the fact that he only went for visitation to be stick it to the mother. That’s sick and child support no matter how much isn’t worth it.
He knew she was dead hours before , so why would he try to hring back a dead for hours kid he killed?
How about 16:yrs of child support
Too many innocent children are dying.
I think your law enforcement officers are the best at finding and looking effortlessly to solve a case. I praise you all. If only we had it here S Africa would be so much better. The way is was before 1994 and asspecially now.
Why is mail order bride legal or considered ethical for ppl to do it
I never understood how people can actually defend people like thiis
How did the first autopsy miss THIS ??
Crappy, shoddy work.
That intro was great!
This thing of people taking out life insurance on other peoples lives is a dangerous practice. Insurance company should be held responsible to inform the person that another individual has taken a policy on their life. Too many criminals getting away with this
Gotta love a defense attorneys the stuff they come with , so obviously guilty