ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Princess Marina: Poverty life of mum of the Queen's first cousin Duke of Kent - Royal Insider
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ต.ค. 2022
- The poverty life of mother of late Queen Elizabeth II's first cousin the Duke of Kent.
#RoyalInsider #DukeofKent #QueenElizabeth #RoyalFamily
About the channel:
Royal Insider Channel is delighted to share news aggregated daily about royal families around the world, especially interesting stories, news about the British royal family. Stay up to date with Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III, Camilla, Queen Consort, The Prince and Princess of Wales, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Andrew... as they make appearances, attend royal events and carry out their duties, and fascinating stories about royal traditions, their fashion and lifestyles, and relationships among royals, updates on royal weddings, baby news, ...
To get latest videos please subscribe to the channel: bit.ly/3jGLOsA
Videos at Royal Insider can use copyrighted content based on fair use laws (www.youtube.co...
and
(en.Wikipedia.o...)
For copyright matters relating to the channel please contact us directly at : SharonDieben@outlook.com
My Mother worked for Molyneux,a very exclusive couturier.She did all the fitting's for Princess Marina's wedding dress,helped by all the workroom girls.She said Princess Marina was a lovely friendly person.After the wedding,the girls received a portion of wedding cake each,and a LARGE bottle of champagne from Princess Marina .
Marina herself had a been a house model for major couture houses in Paris in the late 1920s/ early 1930s. Her family were in exile from Greece, living in Paris and she was very beautiful, so clothes looked magnificent on her.
@@juliettepeers5226 Thank You Juliette,this is very interesting.😄
To the author. One important correction. After the Duke's death, it will cease to be a royal dukedom and his son will be addressed as His Grace instead of His Royal Highness NOT because of the Catholic conversion of his mother. It is because the present duke is a grandchild of a monarch, and hence both a royal prince AND royal duke (just like his cousin, Richard of Glouster). But he is not a direct line grandchild, for instance like William. Edward's son will be a (non direct line) great-grandchild and not eligible to be a prince. He inherits his father's dukedom and therefore is His Grace, like all dukes in the UK. But it has zero to do with Catholicism. The Catholicism issue is simply why he is not in line of succession any longer, totally separate issues.
Exactly right, the present Duke of Kent is the grandson, in the male line, of a monarch and, as such, can assume the title "Royal Highness" but that privilege ends with him. Great-grandchildren of the monarch who are not in the direct line of succession cannot, since the decision of King Gorge V in 1917, be styled as Royal highness. The children of Princess Anne are not Royal Highnesses, even though they are grandchildren of a monarch, they are not in the male line.
@jimleonard6822 Princess Anne chose not to give her children the royal title from what I've always read & been told. This was her personal decision otherwise they would all have a Royal title.
I wish I'd read your post before posting my own.
@@Gypsygal23 that's nonsense. You read/were told wrong. Her HUSBAND was offered an earldom, which meant that the children would have been "Lord" or "Lady" at birth. Anne's children are female-line grandchildren of a monarch and are not entitled to royal titles/styles, just as Princess Margaret's children aren't.
@@HotVoodooWitch 😲 🤔 I stand corrected. I only wrote what I've read & seen on TV many times over the years. No harm meant 👍
She hardly lived in poverty. Members of the RF gave her money and later paid her an allowance; paid for the children's education; gave her a grace & favour home in Kensington Palace.
She had a staff of 11, ran around in rolls royces, wore designer clothes, left a fortune in jewellery, holidayed abroad several times a year.
Thank you, well liked more like well hated. She thought herself to be above even Queen Elizabeth, Queen Consort later Queen Mother She thought she was more royal than everyone, though the Greek royal family was hardly allowed in Greece. Ironically, after the Council of Vienna the only place the European powers supported nationalist ambitions was in what would become Greece. Being part of the Ottoman Empire for so long and on the periphery of Europe the powers placed a Non-Greek on the throne as was done in other countries. Unfortunately the people who gave us the word xenophobia never really accepted this so she may have been royal, but without a country. I hear Meghan Markle keeps a picture of her in a locket.
@@allanrinaldipaone9850 at least she looked like a queen and not like a cook !
@@allanrinaldipaone9850 …scusami ma perché il popolo greco doveva accettare un re straniero? E poiché la monarchia non era parte della loro storia. Ì grechi. Caro mio esistevano prima dei turchi, un popolo della Asia centrale senza cultura. Un po’ di rispetto per un piccolo paese che ha sofferto tanto anche dagli italiani ,e che ci ha d’atto un passato gloroiso ,la base della nostra cultura.
@@jbac45 L'amata Casa Savoia era originaria della parte francese del confine. Nel 1830's Atene era un piccolo villaggio. I greci non hanno mai avuto un Rinascimento. Non abbiamo ricevuto il nostro alfabeto dai Greci come gli storici ci avevano creduto per tanto tempo. Abbiamo ricevuti dagli etruschi chi proveniano della costa occidentale dell'Anatolia, la Turchia moderna. Come Poe lo scrittore americano diceva "la gloria che fu la Grecia, e la grandezza che fu Roma".
DVX MEA LUX
Marina, Dowager Duchess of Kent was not just a member of the Greek Royal House but her Great Grandfather was Tsar Alexander II, her father was Vladimir Alexandrovich Romanov and her mother was Elena who married into the Greek Royal family. Marina’s uncle, Vladimir later became the self declared Tsar of Russia after the execution of Nicholas II, his son Alexei and his brother Michael. Her Royal heritage was why she felt the Queen Mother and Alice, Duchess of Gloucester were “those Scottish girls” and she was better. In addition, she had been chosen as the bride for the Prince of Wales, later Duke of Windsor. However, he preferred married women!
She most definitely did not live a life of poverty. She lived a life of wealth and privilege. Good for her
She lived in genteel poverty, which was a far poorer lifestyle than she had been used to or expected to have to adapt to.
I want to live in poverty like that. Do me a favour!
Me too.
Your only opportunity to experience that poverty would have taken some manifestations that had to happen before it started.
Please can you learn how to pronounce 'VISCOUNT'. You have made the same mistake on previous commentaries.
Happy birthday 🎊🎂🎉🎁🎈 Duke of Kent
Princess Marina was a first cousin of Prince Philip, and an aunt by marriage of QEII. Although not rich by royal standards, she was well provided for in widowhood. Her home at Coppins was bequeathed to her husband by his favourite aunt, Princess Victoria (or Toria, as she was known, who had died just before her brother, King George V at the end of 1935). And while she herself may not have automatically received a royal stipend during the war, her children certainly did, which included the full costs of their education and a number of staff. Queen Mary is known to have been close to her - supplying much of her jewellery; and she was particularly close to her sister Olga, Princess Paul of Yugoslavia. What she lacked in funds, she received in kind, and privately, from the King and members of all the royal families she was connected to.
I'm not sure what you're referring to when you describe the air crash that killed Prince George as a mystery. While the princes' sexuality had long aroused far more interest than it should have done - and conspiracy theorists might hold that the Powers-that-be had a history of killing-off gay or bisexual princes during the period of all homosexual activity being illegal and punishable with imprisonment - reference Prince Albert Victor in 1892, it is simply a conspiracy theory and nothing more. Irrespective of where the duke was going or who he was with in the 1942 crash, it has now been established that it was definitely an accident.
I suspect her son the 2nd Duke took her on a tour of the Far East when he was aged 17, rather than the other way around! This is because as Duke of Kent, he would have been the official visitor - and because he was unmarried, his mother remained Duchess of Kent, and not Dowager, a title that she was never obliged to use and didn't technically become until his marriage to Katherine in 1960.
The religion of the Earl of St Andrews and Baron Downpatrick has nothing to do with their lack of royal status - either now or in future, when they eventually succeed as Duke of Kent. This is because under the Provisions of the Titles Deprivation Act, 1917, the princely style and titular dignity of His or Her Royal Highness is reserved only for children and grandchildren in the male line of a Sovereign. The only exception was "the eldest son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales," however in 2013, Queen Elizabeth II issued Letters Patent extending this exception to "all children of the (then) Duke and Duchess of Cambridge." (This was in order to avoid the situation where if their firstborn had been female, she might subsequently have been displaced by the birth of a male). As he is a grandchild in the male line of King George V, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent has used the titular dignity of HRH all his life (he was styled (HRH The Earl of St Andrews when his father was still alive); but because he is not the Prince of Wales, none of his children are entitled to be known as Princes or Princesses with the dignity of HRH and they are instead, styled as the children of a non-royal duke. Indeed, as it appears King Charles desires to limit the princely style and use of HRH, possibly to the main line only, I suspect that a new Titles Deprivation Act will; replace the 1917 one, and future grandchildren of a Sovereign that are not in the main line of succession, will also be styled in this way, although he may concede to allowing their younger children (but not grandchildren) to remain Prince/ss without the dignity of HRH...
The Queen's Letters Patent of 2012 had nothing to do with male primogeniture; she just wanted all of William's children to be HRH while she was still alive instead of just George. I personally thought it was overkill, given that they'd all be HRH eventually, but hey--that was her pleasure.
NOT ALEXANDER !!! ALEXANDRA
Duchess of Kent,Marina was princess of Greece and Denmark,she had relatives in many European families,Habsburgs,Queen Juliana of Netherlands,Princess Irene,Duchess of Aosta,Queen Sophia of Spain,Romanian royals,Greek royals,Danish royals,Norwegian royals because of that connections she could make pro-British international policy,influence on politics,diplomats of other European countries.She played important role in European diplomacy,economic,educational ties,british representative among European royalty.
The Duchess, according to royal biographer Hugo Vickers, was "the only war widow in Britain whose estate was forced to pay death duties".
Error at 8:00. The Duchess's stillborn child was in 1977, not 1997.
Another error is your frequent mispronunciation of Princess Alexandra's name. Look carefully at the spelling and don't leave out the "r" before the final "a".
The feminine name is AlexandRA.
It's like Sandra, which is its shortened form.
The masculine is AlexandER.
The future styling of the current Earl of St Andrew’s as “his Grace” and not HRH is not because of his Catholicism but rather the fact that he is a GREAT grandson of a sovereign (George V). The HRH designation ends with his father - a grandson of the sovereign. Even if the Earl had remained an Anglican, he would not be an HRH when he assumes the dukedom.
I think the Earl IS CoE, no? It's his younger brother who's Roman Catholic.
They are fabulous members of the Royal Family.
The duchess of Kent has done so much hands on work for children. A genuinely good woman. The royal family have the same double standards as any one else when finances become an issue.
The Duchess of Kent has lived apart from the Duke for many years.( she’s 89 by the way) They have not divorced because there is nobody else involved,and because of the Duchess’ s Catholic faith. They remain good friends,and after the Dukes stroke stayed with him when he returned home ,for several weeks until his mobility improved. She lives in London. She is a lovely lady and taught music ,singing and volunteered for Help the Aged too.
Princess Marina was vehemently opposed to her son marrying katherine Worsley , a "commoner" and also disliked the idea that she ,herself, would no longer be Duchess of Kent
How very selfish.
No. The change in religion is NOT why the Dukedom of Kent will not be a royal dukedom. It's because of the Letters Patent of George V limiting who is called prince or princess.
At this stage (until King Charles changes it) princes and princess are children of the monarch, male line grandchildren (in other words children of princes, but not princesses, remembering that traditionally one takes their father's name, so if a princess marries a commoner, her children are commoners like Princesses Margaret and Anne, both children of monarchs. The only great-grandchildren of monarch that get to be princes and princesses are the children of the eldest son (though this may have changed to eldest child now) of the Prince of Wales. That's why William's children are princes and princess. Once Prince George has children, they will be entitled to titles, but his siblings won't be until their father becomes king
She was not so wealthy like another members of the "firm", but she was more royal than the queen herself. Tall, elegant and beautiful, she could easely outshine other women of the royalty.
I don't think I've ever seen a photo of her in which she didn't appear to be smirking.
I think you will find the name is Alexandra, Princess Alexandra, a lovely lady married to Angus Ogilvy.
Was married, Angus has been dead for several years
Lady Colin Campbell said today it was the Queen Mother behind this. I would say it was out of spite because Princess Marina called her a 'common Scots girl'. Which she was so the Queen Mother did this out of spite and revenge.
That I can believe, the Queen mother was a right nasty lady.
The so called Lady Colin Campbell is a fantasist and very few people in Britain take her seriously or have even heard of her
@@pedanticradiator1491 Hers is one of the most highly rated popular youtube channels, so that's where you're wrong.
@@jackdoe4632 really? Probably with Gossip obsessed Americans
What do you have to offer the world. Nothing but negativity, just like the Queen Mother.
"Poverty"?.....NO
Yes, what exactly is "genteel" poverty anyway? My connotation of the term is that while the widow of a Duke had lost a lot of her wealth (as compared with other Duchesses) and may have had less than other royalty, she was far from being poor in the sense that most people would think.
It is difficult to understand someone living in poverty when they leave as inheritance jewelry.
POVERTY is a word that can be used by different classes of Society!
From information her life Marina was not first line royal in UK after her husband died in air craft 1942 so she had to leave her country house APPLETON(originally given to Edward the 7th’s daughter princess Maude
(Queen Maude of Norway 1906) so Marina had a 90 room
APARTMENT IN
KENSINGTON PALACE! Poor
NO!
HM The Queen always considered the Kents more Royal as Princes Marina was Royal while the Queen Mother was a commoner. She always helped Prince Michael of Kent and he was an given an apartment in KP. This concern was raised as they were paying minimal rent.
I enjoy your videos very much, they’re always interesting, this one though, did irk me a little, you kept saying Princess Alexander, but it was Princess AlexandRA.
The king was right. The other war widows didnt get a thought. They struggled even more.
Dreadful commentator voice. Study Princess Anne
Absolutely horrible, ignorant and uneducated.
The Earl was never his royal highness so he would never be His royal highness Duke of Kent. That has nothing to do with the fact that he is Catholic.
Thank you for letting people know about HRH's interest in Freemasonry. Many biographers avoid mentioning this important fact of their subject interest.
As far as I'm aware all the senior members of the Royal Family are members of the Freemasons.
My dad was also one. They don't deserve all the conspiracy theories around them. They are one very large global charity organisation. My dad lived and died a Christian, upholding Christian values and was buried after a service was held for him at his church. He was also a Grand Master at the time of his death.
'interest in Freemasonry', hardly. He was chief wizard and Lord High magic wand waver of this band of males.
@@fritzhenning1 True, but Churchill was a Freemason but it is never mentioned. Many PMs of Oz were Freemasons, but reading their bios you would never know. It is the Biographers who don't mention it.
His brother Prince Michael of Kent is a grand master.
Genteel poverty? Bet she didn't need to use food banks or shop in Charity shops for her clothes.
If they do Royal duties they should get recompense for it , 50/100 on the public service list certainly would not make a difference to public finances compared to the brand UK.
Ps I'm Irish
What a disgrace ...... am sure Cookie had a hand in this !!
Absolutely she did. Lady Colin Campbell has just said so and she is never wrong.
And I pray that the royal family has done something good for the Duke of Kent’s mother
they did not...they continued to throw crumbs to her...
They did.
A yearly bus pass
Princess Alexandra. How can your AI not be programmed with that loved lady's name. She is NOT Alexan DER disgusted.
This channel gives such ignorant and lumpish narration. ‘Princess Alexander’ indeed. Mrs. Ogilvie might dispute that idea. (Is a ‘Vice- Count’ a Viscount?)
Katherine Worsley was from a very rich family.
@6:46 the word 'viscount' is pronounced 'vai-cont'. The 's' is silent.
When Queen Elizabeth II took the Throne in 1952 she ensured that her Aunt Marina received financial support from the Crown, with the support and action of Sir Winston Churchill, as described above as King George VI failed to do so.
Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother was always jealous of Princess Marina who was Royal Born therefore several social stations higher than herself.
Please read Lady Colin Campbell's book 'The Queen Mother" - the first Chapter alone will blow your mind.
The woman shown as HRH Princess Alexandra is in fact Lady Elton, a Lady in Waiting to HM Queen Elizabeth II.
The Duchess was treated appallingly. I only hope hat the royal family made funds available to her on a private basis.
Genteel poverty, with servants and a grace and favour home. Hardly destitute.
it wasn't a grace and favour home, Prince George had inherited it
A bit of information given out in this video is wrong. Too bad the person(s) who runs this channel does not think accuracy of information is important. The use of HRH is not attached to the title of Duke of Kent, he was granted HRH status because he is a grandson of a sovereign (George V) and his siblings and his cousin the Duke of Gloucester. & etc.
What do you mean ' shared three children'! Some new woke definition of 'having children'?
It's merely a variation in phrasing. So many on both sides of the woke issue are over-reacting. Just be respectful of people who are different from you. Period. End of discussion.
@@karenryder6317 Sorry, this is not a variation in phrasing, its just stupidity sharing three children!
stop sprouting the term 'woke' at any opportunity.
There is no mystery surrounding the air crash , the credible facts have long been established. On other notes….Princess Alexandra NOT Alexander unless I misunderstand your narration. As for Princess Marina’s position, yes indeed she was improperly treated - largely due to a great deal of disaffection between the Queen and the Princess . The reasons for which , being quite convoluted but true. And also partly because Marina’s brother - in - law , as the Regent of Yugoslavia , found himself in the MOST impossible situation , impossible to solve if trying to protect his people from the ravages of war. Alone that is interesting . This channel would do well to consult more closely with Celia Lee . IMO
Well said and yes, you heard correctly- Alexander. Oh you missed Vicecount!! Wow.
Yes, both jarring mispronunciations!
The Queen mentioned with Princess Marina was the Queen Mother not our recently deceased late Queen Elizabeth ll, as she and Princess Alexandra were reportedly very close.
@@aliciarobertson4979 ñ
@@aliciarobertson4979At the time the thence Queen Mother was the Queen but not The Queen . Too difficult ?
@@alexandradane3672
No, not at all. I knew what you meant. You made a great comment.
I had remarked only to expand after listening to a young friend as not everyone knows that The Queen was very different from her mother the Queen. I am of the older generation who knew The King and the Queen. Most younger folk don’t know much of the British Royal Family’s background and relationships.
Wow, The Firm has a portfolio of something like $98billion and they could not help her out with private gifts from relatives?
They did....
😮it is quite likely that the late Queen supported her Aunt privately. Princess Marina’s daughter Princess Alexandra was one of Her Majesty’s closest friends. The Queen was known to have supported elderly relatives and some retired members of staff who had devoted their lives to the service of the Crown.
Phillipa Pay £1000 in 1942 is the equivalent of millions today, she wasn't poverty stricken
she'd also got some fabulous jewels of her own
and the public purse is for those working royals born into the house of windsor
and the royal family are not worth billions, the palaces, windsor castle and a lot of the i royal collection
are NOT personally owned by them, they are "owned IN RIGHT OF THE CROWN" which means because
they are the Monarch, they actually belong to the nation
the Monarch is worth over £400 million,
but as she couldn't be officially be part of the public purse, which is only certain expenses covered as a working royal, they don't receive any cash and that is what stopped when Prince George, Duke of Kent
died, but as it couldn't covered by what is now the sovereign grant. the Monarch covered it
@@lsmith9249 I understand all of this. Thank you. I recently read that their portfolio of land, art, jewels, stocks, bonds, etc., aside of what is owned by the British people, is, in fact, worth something like $98 billion. Which surprised me because I thought the royals of Monaco, Luxembourg, and Liechtenstein were the only ones in the billionaire category among Europe's royal families. Perhaps there was a typo. Land is worth lots of pounds. I am well aware that none of these people are flat broke and without any financial resources to use.
@@lsmith9249 P.S. I researched it and the 1,000 pounds sterling from 1942 would be worth 52,370 pounds today.
The “s” in Viscount is silent.
Duke of Kent looks very ill.
I seem to remember that his mother Marina, the Dowager Duchess used to give out the prizes at Wimbledon. Am I correct? Does anyone else remember?
The plane wreckage is still lying on a hillside above the village of Helmsdale, Sutherland in the North of Scotland.
She did.
@@bewareofpigeons Thank you. I guess that would have been in the Rod Laver era.
The Duke of Kent looks 86.
The Queen, on the other hand, did not even begin to look 90, until the day before she decided to have breakfast in bed and died .... .
@@MandyJMaddison Agree more or less. She looked pretty dreadful on the Tuesday when she met Truss. I put that down to the meeting a short time before ( no pic published ) when she met Boris!
@@rleitros9378 ,
She was still smiling, but she looked tiny and thin and frail. I didn't think she would see the week out!
Wow, that he would still do that after the way they treated his mother. Good reporting, terrible story for the mother.
this is utter rubbish, she and George were worth millions, what stopped when George died were the expenses that are covered as a working royal, royals do not receive any cash for being working royals
certain expenses are paid, such as for their office
and the Monarch covered them, so she able to carry on as a working royal
do not believe everything you heard, inaccurate & slanted
Wow I’m getting a lot of feedback from my comment. Thank you both for responding.
Gurrrllllll I wish I had some of that gentile poverty, this woman was not poor
Smart expose biography.
So that’s their version of poverty. And Churchill had the nerve to state that she didn’t spend extravagantly. But earlier in this story it was mentioned that she dressed fashionably………WOWWWWW!!!
I guess it was just all too too much for the royals at this time, because wasn’t this happening in the midst of King Edwards’s abdication and marriage to Wallace Simpson (his love interest) and should she be given an HH title plus where he (Edward & Wallace) would live?
If you read BUTLER ROYAL she wasnt impoverished. She received a genrous allowance by Queen Mary and King George and Queen Elizabeth Ii. She left valuable jewels to her children as well.
Very chic lady.
There is no need whatsoever ever for any of them to live in poverty, they are all absolutely rich as Croesus. To leave a part of your family. Well their idea of poverty and the rest of the populations idea of poverty aren’t even in the same company never mind ballpark. Working class folk, can I afford to buy coal to heat the home, the others, I’m so hard up I don’t know if I can afford to have my tiara cleaned, all the diamonds are looking rather dull, sob sob sob.
Marina was never poor she was the window of the Kings son!!!!!!
What a nasty way for the Firm, RF and Churchill to treat a the family of the Duke of Kent’s Mother and siblings. Shameless!
I was under the impression from this video that Churchill disagreed with the decision that "impoverished" (and, as ever, we are speaking relatively) the Duke of Kent's widow.
He’s not that much older than Tampons and Cowmilla 🤷♀️ He has served well ❤️
Well, it appears that the BRF does have a history of ensuring that their relatives remain in a position of relative "beggardliness". Keeping them "at heel" or knowing who is really relevant.
Didn't the Romanovs asked their first cousins for sanctuary and were refused.....
Prince William of Gloucester 1941-1972, son of Henry, Duke of Gloucester and older brother of Richard, Duke of Gloucester is not on the family tree.
Perhaps harry should take note
Why do narrators on these channels refer to Princess Alexandra as Alexander?
In future the dukedom of kent will no longer become royal but a noble dukedom despite their ancestry has direct paternal line of Windsor and of more of royal heritage from both sides (maternally from royal family of Greece and Denmark) than their cousin the late Queen Elizabeth II.
royal dukedoms cease to be royal when they are inherited by the great grandsons of Monarchs
🙏
Yeah, I would have trouble maintaining my estate too, if someone didn’t hand me money.
Duke of Kent looks like Mr Burns on the Simpsons.
You made a mistake. His title has nothing to do with Catholicism
The Duke finna head up outta here next
It's Princess Alexandra NOT Alexander. Small but vital difference. 🙄
That's not Princess Alexandra. Nevertheless great video!
Was she not entitled to a War Widows Pension??
Genteel poverty is far from a commoner's poverty.
Bet if she had been British born, the Treasury wouldn't have been bent on a mission. Smells like the King didn't like her so it was more of a personal vendetta.
It was George vi's queen-
consort, Elizabeth Bowles-
Lyon (the late queen's
mother) who had issues
with Princess Marina.
(She also had issues with
Wallis Simpson Windsor,
the Duchess of Windsor)
[Technically, the queen
mother, Elizabeth, would
have had to curtsy to
Princess Marina when
with other royal families
because Princess Marina
was born a princess.
The Bowles-Lyon's (the late
queen Mum's) family were/
are nobles but they were and
are not now royality.]
(That is why Catherine of
Wales has to curtsy to the
Princesses Anne, Beatrice
and Eugenie --- UNTIL
Catherine is the queen
consort; then the others
will have to curtsy to her!
Queen Regnant and Queen
Consort supercede a
prince, princess and on
down the line of nobles
and others below them)
@@here_we_go_again2571 …what nonsense ….in the year 2022
@@jbac45
That's formal royal protocol.
The reigning king and queen
can change it, if they choose.
Let's see what Charles and later
William do.
@@here_we_go_again2571 …from what I gather it will be simplified , and the monarchy will conform more to our times, the passing of the late queen is literally the end of an era….I think Charles and Camilla will be quite good.
@@jbac45 Yes, I'm hopeful that Charles will stick to his guns on downsizing the royal family and get rid of some of these rather snobbish traditions. I wonder if he believes that the monarchy will be doomed if it doesn't modernize itself.
I believe Parking sacrificed a Royal War Widow for an agriveous reason and caused this family to be embarrassed that the Crown and Royal Family turned thier back on such a fine woman and her children at time she needed them most! Surely since the Royal Family (is so afraid of Secrets Harry may divulge ) could have maid some private arrangement for the DUTCHESS to continues to raise her family in a less worrisome manner! Yet the Duke of Kent has been loyal and Faithful to Her Majesty's for her rein of 70 Years always of service whenever asked! Very sad and disappointing story and glimpse into reasons why the citizens of the UK have a right to express concerns over Royal expenditure! Rest in Peace Princess Marina! You did well when you were forced to! And in Sad grief to boot!
Did Marina know of George's bisexuality and drug addiction before she married him?
the Government did not make provisions for widows of Princes, so if she wanted to carry on as a working royal she would have had to fund it herself
that's why we have the right to express concerns, we pay working royals expenses
privately the King and Queen paid for their grandchildrens education
and Princess Marina was not poor, the mansion was worth millions and so was the jewels
in some ways Marina was a lot like Andrew, she was a Princess by birth
and she wanted to be treated as one and live like one
5 years later she some of the furniture and art and made what would be over ""£4 million today
i'd love to be that poor
The royal family doesn’t have a portfolio of 90 odd billion pounds most of this property is state owned .😊
That is not quite the way it is. The Crown owns it, and the State receives 75% of the income. That is why the UK can have the National Health, and also why vast swathes of natural landscape, forests, seashores, and the like, are preserved for posterity. The part that brings in the money is the rental properties in London. The benefit the Treasury .
Finally you have explained the reality of the terrible situation in which princess Marina found herself at the death of her husband ! Thank you
She's a snob. Diana saw right through her B.S as the rest of the family did.
Sadly Princess Alexandra died from brain cancer.
no holes in shoes
he will not inherited the title of duke
of hes a freemason.kin too nwo group.
Get a new reader
When i read how much is paid for an outfit just to watchh tennis i am disgusted. How many people could be fed with the money. They are too extravagant with their spending.
Awe poor little rich girl would have to live in a small building with a small staff. How about she gets a job so she can get a paycheck so she can pay her rent and pay for her food and pay for her utilities on her own and cook and clean for herself with no staff. I don't care what your title is you're not entitled to anything.
This was boring.
Much of your content is not well researched, but either way, it confirms my feelings about the royal family in general. England needs to get rid of them all.
And put what in their place? If you cast your mind over the Presidents of the world, you will find every deficiency from near idiocy to raging psychosis, allied with frightening power. Tradition is a safeguard. Besides which, royalty is a massive source of tourist revenue, far exceeding the cost of the maintenance which makes jealous minded people so cross.
Maureen Crawley don't believe everything in these videos, Marina wanted to carry on as a working royal
and back then working expenses were not covered for the widows of Princes, even access to the childrens trust funds was mentioned, she would have bled the dry
and the King and Queen paid for the childrens education
Marina was a lot like Andrew, she was a Princess by birth and she wanted to be treated as one and live like one
she was not poor, she worth millions, and when she sold some furniture and art she made over what would be £4 million today
l would love to be that poor
and this video is wrong about public reaction back then, the are judging things on the way we react now
back then there was no public criticism, the public were deferential
What about tourism??? Businesses in Windsor rely on them for income??? To mention just one thing, palaces (state owned) visitors etc better than Yong Kim huh