It happens more often than you'd think. If a camera can have a controllable frame rate, you can get the them to sync all the time. Some people have suggested changing the rotation rate, but come on, that's a bit much for a little special effects.
A tilt jet engine at the wingtips would be les cumbersome and more streamedline, aircraft manufacturer could give it a try, maybe the jet blast is the problem....
That's dangerous because you can't sync the engines. If one engine loses power, you're fucked. With this, the interconnected shaft system keeps both props synced.
Correction (to my original comment). As I suspected the AW609 is powered by two independent PWC PT6C-67A turboshaft engines rated at 1,940shp each. A tad higher than my initial estimate of 1,500shp each but close enough. That's A LOT of power... almost 4,000hp. It's wild how wide the output range in for the PT6 engine. In smaller aircrafts, it can be derated to 500-600shp, though I'm not sure if the fuel burn is any lower. Wild stuff. Id imagine this thing slurps down jet fuel like nobody's business. If I had to guess anywhere from 50-200gph. Hope it has big boy fuel tanks!
Simply fantastic.
nice that look really fun to fly AW609 Tactical Beard
The rate of rotation on the rotors and the sync rate of the camera nearly meshed. that was weird.
This, holy moly.
Wagon wheel effect. If you think this is impressive, you should see this:
th-cam.com/video/2pbYKDW0myU/w-d-xo.html
It's flat disturbing.
It happens more often than you'd think. If a camera can have a controllable frame rate, you can get the them to sync all the time. Some people have suggested changing the rotation rate, but come on, that's a bit much for a little special effects.
The spin of those roters. Is it just on devices or does it look like that in person as well?
Look like very EXPENSIVE Taxi from home to Airport or Snow winter Resort.....
Cool
Be great to see an electric one
É funcional, mas parece ser muito barulhento.
It is functional but seems to be very noisy.
The competitor seems to be bigger.
A tilt jet engine at the wingtips would be les cumbersome and more streamedline, aircraft manufacturer could give it a try, maybe the jet blast is the problem....
It’s called a harrier jump jet. It’s too hot and burns the launch pad.
That's dangerous because you can't sync the engines. If one engine loses power, you're fucked. With this, the interconnected shaft system keeps both props synced.
🥰🥰😊😊😊👌👌👍👍
That pilot was like "hold my beer"
How many horse powers can delivers such prop. engine ?
Correction (to my original comment). As I suspected the AW609 is powered by two independent PWC PT6C-67A turboshaft engines rated at 1,940shp each. A tad higher than my initial estimate of 1,500shp each but close enough. That's A LOT of power... almost 4,000hp. It's wild how wide the output range in for the PT6 engine. In smaller aircrafts, it can be derated to 500-600shp, though I'm not sure if the fuel burn is any lower. Wild stuff. Id imagine this thing slurps down jet fuel like nobody's business. If I had to guess anywhere from 50-200gph. Hope it has big boy fuel tanks!
@@scenicdepictionsofchicagolife thx
คือเขาเตือนเรา 2 ครั้งแล้วเรื่องนักการเมืองถ้าทำธุรกิจมันไม่มีปัญหาแต่ถ้ามีการเมืองเมื่อไหร่ต้องคิดให้รอบคอบ
Take off at 3:39
Did the AW609 go 1000 km/h?!!
489 km/h cruise speed
回転おっそ
theres no transition there
Certainly not as loud as a helicopter.
How many RPM are the propellers of the agusta tilt rotor??
Typical video speed for this sort of video is 24fps. As the rortors are going 'backwards', I would say 24 rpm is a good guess.
Almost 600 in helo mode almost 500 as airplane ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180008646/downloads/20180008646.pdf
cannot understand why anyone would want to fly in it
You're kidding, right? 275 knots top speed; 750 nmi range; 5,500 lb payload; can land nearly anywhere. It's incredibly utilitarian.
@@justlooking813 up to 1000 nmi actually with lower payload which is quiet incredible
cause it's another Italian Masterpiece