@@DhananjaySharma-fd4oo no, that's the truth. you should see the real world statistics. Both London and Mumbai are not good when it comes to sewage management, but London is slightly better compare to Mumbai. Because London is always top when it comes to human development index and GDP per capita. The waste in sewage gets directly pumped into the beach.
@@SaiCharanReddy-oz8ez bro he means that Muslim refugees destroyed London.And soon will in future too,due to which it is becoming dirty and creepy and smelly day by day.So that's he said London is becoming Mumbai.Your humour is on....
@@smallcube-zn2mm I thought Mumbai City was developed by Gujarati population after 1830s and majority property in area was owned by Gujaratis just because of Geographical Location went to Maharashtra. Kolkata was developed by Bengali Population and yes Marwaris and Gujaratis are contributing in its economy without fear of Hapta Wasooli Politian families.
@@UrbanStories 2:13 inferior countries the empire was colonizing? Would've been easier to just admit you genuinely thought it was south of the equator. You aren't convincing many by your glib elaboration. People in the know know a pseudowoke when they hear one.
@@vvarma65 bruh, thats after independence which the video isnt related to. And to call out mamata out now seems very childish as I've been to Kolkata multiple times & the development happened under her.
Yeah it was East India Company and later The Raj's policy to have Calcutta( Kolkata) as second London as evidenced by monuments like Vicotria Memorial . However the TH-camr is talking about private mission of Gov. Frere not British policy as a whole.
Well, British Developed Calcutta : KOLKATA which still has 50% British Architecture, even As 2nd Capital of the Empire including Tram, walkway, Victorian Hallway, Alley, Cafes but Not so well BOMBAY : MUMBAI.. Coz They didn't intended to make that much until later in 19th century Realizes that BOMBAY Became crucial after SUEZ CANAL was opened, Oil Discovery, WWI, Which made British Realize That Calcutta is of Far off on the other side with Lesser Value in 1920 coz Of Massive Famine, Genocide to them.. Meanwhile, BOMBAY can Still Act as FINANCIAL HUB, Across whole world as it is Till date. . So only, calcutta as capital shifted to Delhi by 1920 to Avoid Protest, Revolution, Loss of Jute sector, Famine, Genocide, Debauchery. 😂!!! List is long.
There's a very beautiful building in Karachi as well named after Henry Bartle Frere who served as Commissioner of Sindh and Governor of Bombay. People know the building today as Frere Hall
The Taj is the name of the chain. The hotel in Mumbai is called Taj Mahal Palace. I never said Gandhi didn’t study in London, this video is not his biography
Let me just compliment on the great choice of music and the transitions. As the video progressed, you can feel getting more drawn into it. Loved every frame sir. Keep going!
Now Mumbai has become very crowded and except parts of South Mumbai and bandra rest of Mumbai is slums and Mumbai is unecesscary getting expanded such as navi Mumbai instead of developing other cities in India.
@@Sleepyirishcoffeelol even with your country Ireland, the feudal system started by the royal family ensured that potato peasants never got their due , which was responsible for Irish revolution. This shows how wicked and evil Britain has been.
@@MrAgolikeri The Potato famine was the fault of Protestants Lords, not the Royal family. Heck I don’t think the royal family has done anything for 500 years.
And they didn't develop infrastructure lol. Whatever was done was done for their own comfort and to streamline the process of draining our resources. The wellbeing of Indians was the last thing on their mind.
@N_ei_L To say they didn't develop infrastructure was purely misguided. They did construct roads, railways, electricity, plumbing system, university, etc. They did those, however, only to benefit themselves, just like you said. Even though those infrastructures benefit India in its development afterwards after the independence, it's a shame that that didn't foster a more inclusive and less exploitative society.
Forget the past, the British told us we are the best in Asia during Raj colonial time. However at present there are at least 50 cites in Asia that are far better than any Indian cities.
not only gandhi but siding with communists and aversion to western funding latter being the bigger reason but that was obvious, still the main reason was when british left they ensured maximum possible unrest happens in country.
It's not because of Gandhi. Or socialism. It's because of caste system inherent in India since centuries atleast from the beginning of 1st millennium of common era. Which kept Indian society weak. If we didn't fix this caste system we won't become next China.
I love when European culture casually fixes and advances an entire area by centuries and then they are promptly told “actually we don’t need you” and so the area slowly declines again.
In this video description there is no elaboration about native residents of Mumbai that's Communites like Agari Koli,bhadrai Pachkskishi etc in fact Nana Shankar shet please read about him on Wikipedia. Gandhi has no significant contribution in building Mumbai When Mumbai was built.in 1857 Jagannath murkute donated land and Money to various institutions please add information About him in this video
Wrong, it's KOLKATA and not MUMBAI. Only some buildings in Bombay like the Brihanmumbai building resemble that of London's later year's gothic architecture. Whereas Kolkata just like London is built beside a river. Kolkata just like London is not exactly built at the coast but a little in wards.
You got the origin of name wrong. It was named bombay because locals there pray to goddess mumba. Hence it got name mumbai. BUT Brits being brits they were unable to pronounce it that way so they shifted to bumbai-->bombay
No, Bombay comes from Portugese, Bom Bahia meaning good bay. Mumba is a rock that 20 people happen to worship. And in the interest of politics the name was changed
interesting video !!! i forget how important the Indian sub-continent was to british empire . does anyone know if the french or any other powers tried this. id imagine mexico city was the project for spain. maybe for the french it was be brazzaville
So many wrong details about India's history and culture. Please get your facts straight about Ancient, medieval and modern India. All Britishers wanted to do was loot India, there was no modern or technological advancement brought by them, all they did was for their personal growth and benefits They just left left a beautiful country with more than 25% of world GDP in the 18th Century to less than 2% of world GDP in the 20th Century.
Can you specify any fact that you think is wrong in the video? Apart from your personal feelings about British colonization - that's not what this video is about.
@@UrbanStories Really, my personal feelings about British Colonization. Are you aware about the number of people were that were killed when partition of India too place in 1947 or how many innocent soldiers from India and other colonies fought for Britain in the 1st and 2nd World Wars and were brutally killed for no reason. How many innocent men, women, seniors and children died in the great Famine of 1943 because of the World's war hero Mr. Winston Churchill because he thought its better to give all the food and supplies grown in India to the soldiers in 2nd world war instead of people of this country. And also, how can we forget the approximate amount of wealth that the British looted from India which is not less than 45 Trillion USD. These are just few examples I have shared. Britain was nothing but a curse for all its Colonies.
@@UrbanStories British Raj in India was for the worse of Her fate, unfortunately. As a Mumbaikar, I liked ur video, and British did develop Mumbai for which im thankful. But Absolutely when those Beggars, i mean British came and went, they went from Beggars to Kings cuz of the looting.
@navpritkkaur4570 I am not getting annoyed. OK.. I was born and bought up in Surat. I like both cities equally. Mumbai is very near to my hometown and my mom is from New Delhi. I live in London now and some people think Mumbai is the capital of India. I don't like to spread false facts about my country
Need to remember that the Brits did not invest in Bombay or India for local population and definitely to wasn't a win win situation either. It was done for their convenience to plunder wealthy Bharat. Britians status became almost zero in World after they lost India after World War 2.
“an icon of the cutting edge progress that Britian had to offer to the inferior countries the Empire was colonizing” this is a racist and colonial statement.
Ignore this comment as this is a personal msg for someone For Mel Good afternoon, babe 💜💜 Im always here for you too Hugs and kisses 💋💋💋 I love you so much and endlessly ♾️💙💜
Mumbai was not designed to be the next London - Calcutta (now Kolkata) was actually designed to be the next London! Even the architecture is similar in old parts of Calcutta and central London! Are you delusional? Calcutta was the capital of British India, Calcutta was the second most important city in the entire British empire after London!
Now London is the next Mumbai 😂😂
More so London is the next Karachi
no London is still clean than Mumbai. Mumbai is only more dirtier than London
@@SaiCharanReddy-oz8ezyour sense of Humour defines you how old are you
@@DhananjaySharma-fd4oo no, that's the truth. you should see the real world statistics. Both London and Mumbai are not good when it comes to sewage management, but London is slightly better compare to Mumbai. Because London is always top when it comes to human development index and GDP per capita. The waste in sewage gets directly pumped into the beach.
@@SaiCharanReddy-oz8ez bro he means that Muslim refugees destroyed London.And soon will in future too,due to which it is becoming dirty and creepy and smelly day by day.So that's he said London is becoming Mumbai.Your humour is on....
Not Mumbai. It's Calcutta. Calcutta's Dalhousie Square is a complete London.
Mumbai in recent years, in 1987, surpassed Calcutta.
Whatever Bengalis (WB) were ruled by British and now ruled by Gujraits
@@smallcube-zn2mmvisit a pshychatrist plz. This mentality is cunning as well as pathetic.
Are you stupid?@@smallcube-zn2mm
@@smallcube-zn2mm nice dream
@@smallcube-zn2mm I thought Mumbai City was developed by Gujarati population after 1830s and majority property in area was owned by Gujaratis just because of Geographical Location went to Maharashtra.
Kolkata was developed by Bengali Population and yes Marwaris and Gujaratis are contributing in its economy without fear of Hapta Wasooli Politian families.
"London of southern hemisphere"? Mumbai is in the northern hemisphere, just south of tropic of cancer.
The idea was that it will be London FOR Southern Hemisphere (probably should have phrased it that way), rather than the exact geographical location.
@@UrbanStories All good. Content is really good. Wish you all the best
@@UrbanStories 2:13 inferior countries the empire was colonizing?
Would've been easier to just admit you genuinely thought it was south of the equator. You aren't convincing many by your glib elaboration. People in the know know a pseudowoke when they hear one.
The global south would have been a term more fitting
that would be singapore or jakarta.
Calcutta was designed to be the successor of London. not Bombay.
Yup, but after it didn't work out they pivoted to Mumbai which did become a financial capital quite successfully
Both became shitholes
Yes but the. CPI and Mamata happened to WB.
@@vvarma65 bruh, thats after independence which the video isnt related to. And to call out mamata out now seems very childish as I've been to Kolkata multiple times & the development happened under her.
Yeah it was East India Company and later The Raj's policy to have Calcutta( Kolkata) as second London as evidenced by monuments like Vicotria Memorial .
However the TH-camr is talking about private mission of Gov. Frere not British policy as a whole.
Well, British Developed Calcutta : KOLKATA which still has 50% British Architecture, even As 2nd Capital of the Empire including Tram, walkway, Victorian Hallway, Alley, Cafes
but Not so well BOMBAY : MUMBAI..
Coz They didn't intended to make that much until later in 19th century Realizes that BOMBAY Became crucial after SUEZ CANAL was opened, Oil Discovery, WWI, Which made British Realize
That Calcutta is of Far off on the other side with Lesser Value in 1920 coz Of Massive Famine, Genocide to them.. Meanwhile, BOMBAY can Still Act as FINANCIAL HUB, Across whole world as it is Till date.
.
So only, calcutta as capital shifted to Delhi by 1920 to Avoid Protest, Revolution, Loss of Jute sector, Famine, Genocide, Debauchery. 😂!!!
List is long.
@@fitoordigitalhouse-zl6eeNormal historians chose not to discuss these events, because they reek of propaganda from corrupt officials in the 1980s
There's a very beautiful building in Karachi as well named after Henry Bartle Frere who served as Commissioner of Sindh and Governor of Bombay. People know the building today as Frere Hall
Man so many mistakes in this video. Gandhi learned law in London, the hotel is Taj Hotel, and not Taj Mahal etc.
The Taj is the name of the chain. The hotel in Mumbai is called Taj Mahal Palace. I never said Gandhi didn’t study in London, this video is not his biography
Thoda vivek paaye aur kam bole
The name of the hotel is Taj Mahal Hotel and Palace. No mistake there. But Gandhi studied his law degree from London.
7:45 It was not soon. It was only in 1997 they changed the name.
Let me just compliment on the great choice of music and the transitions. As the video progressed, you can feel getting more drawn into it. Loved every frame sir. Keep going!
Some of these buildings are very well maintained. Buying a house in that part of the city is impossible for any middle-class person.
Thanks for the video, I love you!
Now Mumbai has become very crowded and except parts of South Mumbai and bandra rest of Mumbai is slums and Mumbai is unecesscary getting expanded such as navi Mumbai instead of developing other cities in India.
Unnecessarily 🤓👆🏻
It's a shame that the British segregated the people of India at the time. They did so well with developing the infrastructures and architectures.
They did not segregate people at the time, that is a misconception.
@@Sleepyirishcoffeelol even with your country Ireland, the feudal system started by the royal family ensured that potato peasants never got their due , which was responsible for Irish revolution. This shows how wicked and evil Britain has been.
@@MrAgolikeri The Potato famine was the fault of Protestants Lords, not the Royal family. Heck I don’t think the royal family has done anything for 500 years.
And they didn't develop infrastructure lol. Whatever was done was done for their own comfort and to streamline the process of draining our resources. The wellbeing of Indians was the last thing on their mind.
@N_ei_L To say they didn't develop infrastructure was purely misguided. They did construct roads, railways, electricity, plumbing system, university, etc. They did those, however, only to benefit themselves, just like you said. Even though those infrastructures benefit India in its development afterwards after the independence, it's a shame that that didn't foster a more inclusive and less exploitative society.
British also developed Calcutta very well
Now it's ruined by our mamta govt.
@@Rr45100 it’s ruined from the day communist took over
Heads up keep up the Good work very accurate information
Thanks 🙏
Finally after year of finding a video on mumbai as I watched all old I found a new good new😊 thanks rey
Alot of stuff reminds of london
Forget the past, the British told us we are the best in Asia during Raj colonial time.
However at present there are at least 50 cites in Asia that are far better than any Indian cities.
Really interesting video !
2:04 London of the ‘Southern’ Hemisphere? I thought you had to know some basic geography to be a governor of Bombay back in the day! :)
London FOR southern hemisphere. Yes it’s above the equator technically, it’s the geopolitical region they refer to.
@@UrbanStories they’d still be wrong. I’d understand if they called it ‘London of the South’. But London of the Southern Hemisphere is not acceptable.
your channel is very informative, wish you luck to get more subscribers
Thanks 🙏
Mumbai has 50 percent slums , highest in the world
Why did India never become a developed country like Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, or the USA?
answer: Gandhi happens
not only gandhi but siding with communists and aversion to western funding latter being the bigger reason but that was obvious, still the main reason was when british left they ensured maximum possible unrest happens in country.
Because of democracy and secularism
Democrazy and sickularism
It's not because of Gandhi. Or socialism. It's because of caste system inherent in India since centuries atleast from the beginning of 1st millennium of common era. Which kept Indian society weak. If we didn't fix this caste system we won't become next China.
Mumbai is the first Mumbai and last Mumbai. Only Mumbai and exclusive MUMBAI. ❤
STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION.
Good topic
I love when European culture casually fixes and advances an entire area by centuries and then they are promptly told “actually we don’t need you” and so the area slowly declines again.
Actually bombay is in northern hemisphere
Im just gonna say it Mumbai is not even close to London Mumbai is a complete shithole
So, a Frenchman made Bombay? (Frere)
He was British but was of Huguenot background
Can you make one for “MANILA”?!. #please
The place you circles to show the Oval Maidan is actually the Colaba Causeway.
DADBAI!!!
LONDOFF!!!
In this video description there is no elaboration about native residents of Mumbai that's Communites like Agari Koli,bhadrai Pachkskishi etc
in fact Nana Shankar shet
please read about him on Wikipedia.
Gandhi has no significant contribution in building Mumbai
When Mumbai was built.in 1857
Jagannath murkute donated land and Money to various institutions
please add information About him in this video
Wrong, it's KOLKATA and not MUMBAI. Only some buildings in Bombay like the Brihanmumbai building resemble that of London's later year's gothic architecture. Whereas Kolkata just like London is built beside a river. Kolkata just like London is not exactly built at the coast but a little in wards.
*Mumbai is the original name of the city.*
You got the origin of name wrong.
It was named bombay because locals there pray to goddess mumba. Hence it got name mumbai.
BUT Brits being brits they were unable to pronounce it that way so they shifted to bumbai-->bombay
No, Bombay comes from Portugese, Bom Bahia meaning good bay. Mumba is a rock that 20 people happen to worship. And in the interest of politics the name was changed
@@Sleepyirishcoffeewe don't need history lessons from fucking rice bag converter 😊
SIR HENRY. Not Sir Bartle Frere. Like Sir Keir. Not Sir Starmer. Or Sir Walter. Not Sir Raleigh.
interesting video !!! i forget how important the Indian sub-continent was to british empire . does anyone know if the french or any other powers tried this. id imagine mexico city was the project for spain. maybe for the french it was be brazzaville
Half of Mumbai is slums wake up
Gr8
Croma at 5:30
This not Taj Mahal Hotel, This is Taj Hotel.
Taj Hotels is the name of the chain. The full name of this particular hotel is Taj Mahal Palace.
6:59 So he thought that instead of growing, India should live in its past, and he started a cult?
So many wrong details about India's history and culture. Please get your facts straight about Ancient, medieval and modern India. All Britishers wanted to do was loot India, there was no modern or technological advancement brought by them, all they did was for their personal growth and benefits
They just left left a beautiful country with more than 25% of world GDP in the 18th Century to less than 2% of world GDP in the 20th Century.
Can you specify any fact that you think is wrong in the video? Apart from your personal feelings about British colonization - that's not what this video is about.
@@UrbanStories Really, my personal feelings about British Colonization. Are you aware about the number of people were that were killed when partition of India too place in 1947 or how many innocent soldiers from India and other colonies fought for Britain in the 1st and 2nd World Wars and were brutally killed for no reason. How many innocent men, women, seniors and children died in the great Famine of 1943 because of the World's war hero Mr. Winston Churchill because he thought its better to give all the food and supplies grown in India to the soldiers in 2nd world war instead of people of this country. And also, how can we forget the approximate amount of wealth that the British looted from India which is not less than 45 Trillion USD. These are just few examples I have shared. Britain was nothing but a curse for all its Colonies.
Sound like a Hindu fascist
How does that make the facts in my video right or wrong?
@@UrbanStories British Raj in India was for the worse of Her fate, unfortunately. As a Mumbaikar, I liked ur video, and British did develop Mumbai for which im thankful. But Absolutely when those Beggars, i mean British came and went, they went from Beggars to Kings cuz of the looting.
Please make videos on New Delhi. Mumbai is just a financial capital of India but the actual capital city of India is New Delhi.
😂why u getting annoyed
@navpritkkaur4570 I am not getting annoyed.
OK.. I was born and bought up in Surat.
I like both cities equally. Mumbai is very near to my hometown and my mom is from New Delhi.
I live in London now and some people think Mumbai is the capital of India. I don't like to spread false facts about my country
Long Live the King!
Nothing can beat the original
London is London periodt.
Majority of mumbai was sea British put so much send that Majority of sea is now Mumbai
Need to remember that the Brits did not invest in Bombay or India for local population and definitely to wasn't a win win situation either. It was done for their convenience to plunder wealthy Bharat. Britians status became almost zero in World after they lost India after World War 2.
Ahh, creating colonialist hybridity
Mumbai turned out to be Lagos rather than London 😂
It has potential to become London.
London isn't dreamy anymore lol.
ignore the gandhi part as he ignore our more great freedom fighters
You were looking for a comprehensive history of India course in 8 minutes?
Dream on
Thumbnail 😅🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Mumbai is Indian version of New York like Hong Kong is China's New York
Dubai is the new London.
London is new Karachi
Gandhi learned Law in London and not in Bombay! 6:47
He studied in Bombay first, before moving to London
I was only talking about his Law studies!
“an icon of the cutting edge progress that Britian had to offer to the inferior countries the Empire was colonizing” this is a racist and colonial statement.
Cool video but I hate the AI voice.
Mine is worse 😉
Why do we need to label our cities as next-off any other...
Culcutta not Bombay
delhi has more people then mumbai
Very sloppily made , wrong screenshots, wrong stories , etc
LMFAO, how do those cities have anything in common? These stupid AI channels are just extrapolating absolute horseshit all over the internet 😂
What parameters were used to assemble this top? really weird top
What top?
Its not Taj Mahal Palace, it is Taj Palace.
This video is just english narrative and misinformation.
Bombay University is today one of the shittiest universities in the country. Though it has a very beautiful building
How it degraded that much?
Still way better than any universities in shit hole bimaru states 😊
Ignore this comment as this is a personal msg for someone
For Mel
Good afternoon, babe 💜💜
Im always here for you too
Hugs and kisses 💋💋💋
I love you so much and endlessly ♾️💙💜
All was fine and dandy until the street crappers took over!
All that bland food & baked beans breath finally left 🤮🤢
!
Nice Joke
too much over hyped gandhi lore
dude India is not even in the southern hemisphere. This video is filled with absolute false facts
It’s amazing that when the British left India they went backwards 200 years. Those people are so ungrateful for what the British did for them.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Gandhi made India a poor country
Slumbai
Mumbai was not designed to be the next London - Calcutta (now Kolkata) was actually designed to be the next London! Even the architecture is similar in old parts of Calcutta and central London! Are you delusional? Calcutta was the capital of British India, Calcutta was the second most important city in the entire British empire after London!
The Hindu gods in the flesh
Yashu in the Trash
But hindutava made it most polluted and slum city😂😂😂
And your countries are just slums but for terrorists 😊
If you're interested sir , Just give me your telegram account and I will join