Drag Race #94 | Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X SST vs Evo X 5MT
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2020
- From Best motoring series 2008
0~402m race
Lancer Evolution X GSR SST
Engine 4B11 1998cc 4DOHC
Max Power 280ps/6500rpm
Max Torque 43.0kgm/3500rpm
Weight 1540kg
1/4 mile 13.712
Lancer Evolution X 5MT
Engine 4B11 1998cc 4DOHC
Max Power 280ps/6500rpm
Max Torque 43.0kgm/3500rpm
Weight 1520kg
1/4 mile 14.057
Send a donation to support this Channel
/ jackkello - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
![แขกคนแรกร้านแจ๊ส [ซี - เอมมี่] | iJazzKhunJang](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XP6C9kulFfc/mqdefault.jpg)
MT had a great start though. Great launch
Thats true
I still love mt.
He avoided the turbo lag, but wasn't enough
Look at the ratio and you know why
Plus Super Shiftronic transmission mechanism just like dual clutch trans, two sets of gear 1,3,5 and 2,4 are changed between two of it using clutch. Its more reliable than automatics as auto have each clutch for each gears and using planetary gear
I love Mitsubishi! I have one...
Good video!
Respect From Hungary!
Love Mitsubishi sports cars.
Love the GTO SR I owned 😍🤪
I had GTO SR as well! My first ever car! They are amazing. I also have MR, TT and FTO Version R ;)
@@paologarcia8541 Man this car love is on another level. Drive safe always ✨
Horses for courses, all depends what you actually want either way the evo x is a solid car . I own the sst and it's way faster gear change than manual but I do prefer the manual gearbox just my preference . When buying car the manual I paid deposit on fell through and no other clean manual around to buy so went for a clean stock sst . Still a great drive
When I bought my Evo in 2008, Mitsubishi had talked up the SST so much, a lot of people didn't realize a 5-speed was standard. The SST didn't even get to the USA until 4 or 5 months after I bought my car.
About 11 years ago some magazine did a comparison test of a 5-speed and an "SST" Evo and, whether Mitsubishi liked it or not, they tested them on a dynamometer. They found that the SST car had a lot more power. An advantage of 5% or so. Mitsubishi was sending the press *ringers*, to try and sell the more expensive model. (One of the oldest automotive marketing tricks)
And it didn't work. The more I read about the SST, the more I was happy with my manual car.
The SST was quirky, and got a reputation for being unreliable. The oil pump was poorly lubricated, causing jerkiness. The shift fork magnets and shift sensors would fail, so the car wouldn’t shift. If it broke, Mitsubishi mechanics couldn't fix it: They had to install a new one and send the broken one to Getrag for repair.
In the long run, most Evo X buyers got the 5-speed.
Mitsubishi quoted 50k miles for gearbox oil changes. This caused most of the issues you describe. Regular oil changes stopped these problems occurring- build up of debris on magnets causing shift errors. Boxes good for about 410lbft and reliable if regularly serviced.
the SST is amazing !
@@AdrianMatson yeh, when its upto temperature it works really well. Keep on top of the oil changes though. 2 years max between changes - stick with diaqueen sstf-1.
@@ianjohnson4541 will do
I have a 2014 MR with 124,000 km's on it and the SST is as strong as it was off the showroom floor. Mitsu never had sleepers, dyno tests from day 1 showed the MR lost more power to the drivetrain which is just physics. Where the MR wins, the shifts are milliseconds and no one has millisecond shifts on manuals.The problem with the shift forks was idiots running launch control when the trans temp was under 160F. Cold+dual clutch+launch control kills hyper car dual clutches, a $40,000 Evo MR can't avoid dumb owners. Mitsubishi and Getrag have a core exchange program...not new to the auto world, it's cost efficient. This is because the SST is strong...if it was weak, they'd toss it in the recycler bin.
🔥
Hi Jack, do you have a video of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X vs 9 drag race?
They both still 2.0 turbo awd right?
Let's fighting love!! 💜❤️💜❤️💜❤️💜❤️💜
❤❤❤
kukurakece protect my balls !
I loved my EVO X SST.I bought a Nissan GTR R35 to park along side it.The EVO had the ability to change gears with the stick the GTR didn't,just paddles.I modded the EVO to produce 400 bhp but my GTR killed on a track day.The GTR was so at home but the EVO 's brakes faded.
Get a earlier model evo, a lot better on track
@@khromeheartzz why? They are lighter?
How much money do you have
but ur name is aston martin
@@scatterswild6462 dude don't even own that as well.
🔥🔥🔥
The SST car has less than 1/4 tank of fuel, but the manual car has full tank lmao
50 liter tank btw in this gen Lancer Evos.
How about Final Edition 2015 model year (313ps with 5-speed MT) vs 2012 model year (300ps with 6-speed SST)?
Sst will still be faster. Its practically the same battle mate.
@@CDTJosh what about Evo X SST (291 hp) vs Evo 9 MR (276 hp) vs Evo 6 TME (276 hp) ?
What about your Mum ? 🤔
I love Mitsubishi engine 4b12
Evo X and Rallairts share the 4b11t only NA lancers come in the 4b12
Mitsubishi love lion amazing great nice best ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Nah the Manual didn't got a chance to reach full speed unlike the automatic
👈🏻👈🏻
Startoh
Of course this in japanese
Didn't know that the Japanese even do drag races
They focus more on drifting and rally but a lil straight line never hurt anybody
@@tonyrodriguez3510 the midnight club would like to have a word with you
@@marquaviouschester6947 lmao
HKS had dedicated drag cars for some events.
wooooooo yea MR woooooo fuckem him up he cheated off the line.... LOL !!!! WOOOOO MR!~!
Forza Automatic
Most malaysian said gsr is 1.8 engine
No that's not from evo, that's from lancer , codenamed as 4g93t (evo is 4g63t). Proton owners (except Perdana owners) are only allowed to install 4g93 because JPJ's strict restriction allowing only engines with 200cc capacity larger than the standard engine swapped into a chassis. For example, Proton Waja is 1.6, so only engines with 1.8 capacity are allowed to be swapped into Proton Waja.
@@kupangrebus3177 nasib abe ni pandai belajar haha
Car with manual has full tank of gas, while SST has approximately only 25%
Very simple:
6 speeds > 5 speeds
In other words: ==> Better gearing
Super Titan Tsunami wdym
@@Itachlazcano21 The SST is a 6-speed transmission vs the 5-speed for the manual
6-speeds = better gear ratio's = it can get power down more efficiently
Notice the manual got the jump off the line, but the SST still catches and passes it later
This is possible because of better gearing
@@supertitantsunami9974 very doubtful imo that was a large hp difference
@@benh4222 What?
@@DRsx4
No.
just as I said:
6 speeds > 5 speeds 01:13
better gear ratios is why it won
Subaru...
All driver not the cars fault
nope...
He did a great start, damn, he tried his best goddamnit
The whole point of the dual-clutch design was that it could shift gears faster than any other transmission. In case that wasn't convincing enough, Mitsubishi used one of the oldest tricks in automotive marketing and loaned the press some SST cars with more power than stock.
I think it was a European magazine that was doing a GSR vs. MR comparison test, and dyno tested both cars. The MR, with the SST, had a definite hp advantage.
Manual is faster all depends on driver
Not with the double clutch gearbox, shifts faster than any other driver...
Still the dual clutch is was worse if you try and do any mods that push over 350 whp the manual can handle wayy more power
@@JackKello
.
@@JacobRidesBikes yes I agree, but for the stock content like these videos on my channel the dual clutch is faster. There is another video on a manual golf gti vs a dual clutch automatic golf gti, the result is the dual clutch is faster.
You missed the entire point of this video.
14 seconds is Very slow, the older evos and the 6mt evo x can do much better, some even do high 12s
There is no 6 spd mt evo x
@@Evox2316_ How they make the evo x with only a 5 speed, when the evo 8 and 9 have a 6 speed manual option? Strange
@@henrique6282 The 6-speed SST *replaced* the 6-speed manual transmissions, partly because older 6-speeds were weak. Their torque rating was considerably lower than that standard 5-speed. With cat-back exhaust and a cold-air intake, you could exceed the 6-speed's torque rating without ever turning up your boost. I knew a couple of Evo owners that swapped in a 5-speed as soon as they wore out their 6-speed.
It was weak because there was no room to make the transmission any longer - the engine and tranny are mounted sideways and constrained by the width of the engine bay - so to put 6 gears in a space designed for 5 meant making the gears narrower.
The SST has totally different geometry inside than the manual transmissions. It has the virtue of putting half the gears on one shaft, and half on the other shaft, so they could be at least as strong as the 5-speed.
@@liquidleopard4495 nice to read at least one commentor that understands the SST.
Vete a alv un automático le gano que un manual xd
Automatic its better than manual slow 😂😂
Of course the mt gonna lose with that granny shift
@@DRsx4 they shift like how I normally drives, if you want to go fast you gotta drive like you stole it, it's a fact. Power shift that shit.
@@ThatOneDude324 still dont have reaction time the sst has
@@baz4184 yep, its impossible to shift fast as dct.