They do this stuff because they got bad aim. LOng ago they use to belt people with rotten fruit or manure the right way now people arms are terrible so they need something not moving.
@@weareallbornmad410 You are very much mistaken if you think destroying a 400 year old work of art is going to convince the majority then you have not been paying attention.
@@kevinlongman007not what I’m saying. If the system is locking people up for throwing some soup on a expensive painting then why is Huw Edward’s not in prison for paying an underage teen for explicit photos?
Sure, causing more damage for the taxpayer to pay for is a great idea. These museums are heavily subsidised by the government by taxpayers' money to keep entry free. Throw these three in jail too.
Once again people are going to care more about what the did than the actual message they are trying to send, there are better ways of getting the message across
Climate change occurs naturally, but the cutting down of rain forests (the planet's lungs) causes more damage than any man made attributes can ever do.
@@bl1398 he used plant oils. No one paints with fossil oil. It's got nothing to do with that. Unless they are being really daft like when they stopped that sunflower oil tanker. But if it was that they could have chosen any other painting in there. Most paintings are oil, particularly older ones.
it's all performative as all the media always seem to be there to capture it and security just stand back and allow it to happen..... anyone that believes these globalists 'paid for' shills are true protestors need their heads examined 😂
Well the first one the art itself was fine but the gold frame took damage and cost £10k to repair so it’s £10k of criminal damage they got done for in the original incident.
@@michaelcolbourn6719 again, intent matter, they indented to cause destructions, just because the failed at it does not change what their actions where. paint will wash off of you if you get in a bath, does that mean people can throw it at you in the first place? The fact is, actions have consequences, and these immature examples needed to have discipline, obviously they have grown up and was not given enough Vitamin N.. being told NO !
Van Gough behind glass. He only sold one or two paintings in his lifetime but someone is making millions from him. If that's not exploitation, what is, eh?
The definition of insanity - doing the same acts of criminal damage and expecting a different outcome. These three can follow their two imprisoned fellow-tracellers.
Maybe they used a different flavour of soup which raised expectations of a different outcome. I've heard that under the right conditions French Onion soup can cross the blood brain barrier and we're all aware of the psychotic events that Ham Hock and Pea created for so many festival goers back in the 60s
2 years will translate to 1 year at most, probably 8 months as we need to get people out of our over crowded jails to make room for people who speak unkindly on social media.
Given it's the only place in the UK where adult education is free, a criminal record might be something our youngsters should consider as a better life choice than 80k student debt.
Was it cos he used oil paints...and whats the symbolism of soup ? does like Mullagawtny represent an escalation as opposed to say Scotch Broth or is this a means of combining a dislike of Van Gough and soup regardless of its flavour in one act.
What is it about van gogh? Is it because he used oil paints?
Destruction is simple, but creation is difficult.
And I bet they have created nothing worthwhile at all.
They do this stuff because they got bad aim. LOng ago they use to belt people with rotten fruit or manure the right way now people arms are terrible so they need something not moving.
“The urge to destroy is also a creative urge”
Let's stop destroying the planet, then.
@@weareallbornmad410 You are very much mistaken if you think destroying a 400 year old work of art is going to convince the majority then you have not been paying attention.
And Huw Edward’s is walking free! 😳🥹😢👀
So that excuses this then?
@@kevinlongman007not what I’m saying. If the system is locking people up for throwing some soup on a expensive painting then why is Huw Edward’s not in prison for paying an underage teen for explicit photos?
@@jaysparrow6631 Yes he should be in prison but these are two seperate incidents.
@@kevinlongman007 obviously but one is worse than the other. Hence my statement!
@@kevinlongman007 Separate incidents, but the same system. There is something wrong with your system.
Suddenly, everyone's an art critic😂
Very funny 😄!
Yes I’m so glad
Lock them up too.
Give them 4 years
20 years would be better I think
Lock these idiots up.
Jail these people instead of the ones who speak the truth about the government
Sure, causing more damage for the taxpayer to pay for is a great idea. These museums are heavily subsidised by the government by taxpayers' money to keep entry free. Throw these three in jail too.
Let them pay for it. No matter how long they need to work for it. Force them to work if necessary.
❤ 👏👏👏 Uk under water 💧 no roads 🎯
Jail
just put security guards in every art museum and gallery
I’m shocked that she only got two years after purposely disobeying the judge’s orders, and getting arrested awaiting sentencing.
This is definitely the way to get people on your side /s
I'm on their side.
@@AdeboFunkyVoodoo and you think ruining priceless works of art is the way to get your message across?
@@JanSaevebek it's not about a message, they're after their fifteen minutes
Any thinking person is already on their side.
Why Van Gogh?😮
Once again people are going to care more about what the did than the actual message they are trying to send, there are better ways of getting the message across
I agree. Can you suggest how, please?
Climate change occurs naturally, but the cutting down of rain forests (the planet's lungs) causes more damage than any man made attributes can ever do.
@@Shona-o1y Exactly - maybe they should just ask the government politely or go directly to Shell and BP and tell them they are not being very nice.
Their message is bs, so there is also that
The message is wrong, the message us propaganda. Now these 2 young women will spend 2 years in jail because they have been brainwashed
I knew it 🤮😂🤣
Van gough would be proud 😊
Sending two young people to jail over this is ridiculous while people like Hue Edward’s get away with it. You lot are jokers.
Should have been more than 2 years. Make examples of them
They should clean the prison floor with their own toothbrushes for two years.
This isn't their first time acting a fool
Just because he got less than he should doesn’t mean these clowns don’t deserve punishment.
Your comment is ridiculous
Congratulations, as a solid lefty, i hope they rot in jail.
I don't think you will "rot" in 2 years.
2 years not enough
@@brianferguson7840with how posh and spoiled they are it’s going to feel like a lifetime to them 😂
There, that will tell those evil oil companies, and governments that deal with them. 😒
What did van goff do wrong?
He used Oil paints 😅
@@LordCTHULHU2173 fair game then
So theyve attacked the painting again out of spite? In retaliation to the sentences? Now these 3 can have their own sentence.
What they got against van Gogh
Maybe it's all a massive misunderstanding and is a homage to Van Goughs love of soup ?..although the message gets lost somehow
He used oil
@@bl1398 he used plant oils. No one paints with fossil oil. It's got nothing to do with that. Unless they are being really daft like when they stopped that sunflower oil tanker.
But if it was that they could have chosen any other painting in there. Most paintings are oil, particularly older ones.
@@dogyamato5619 they are not known for their intelligence tho are they
It's and OIL painting and as well all know OIL is evil. Van Gogh was an evil man.
Give 'em 5 years.
Over a plastic cover that completely encased the art*
If you wear a bulletproof vest does it make it okay for someone too....
NO
The protection is irrelevant. They had intent
it's all performative as all the media always seem to be there to capture it and security just stand back and allow it to happen..... anyone that believes these globalists 'paid for' shills are true protestors need their heads examined 😂
Well the first one the art itself was fine but the gold frame took damage and cost £10k to repair so it’s £10k of criminal damage they got done for in the original incident.
@@MinkieWinkle its pretty relevant. Its not a gun and its not a person. Its soup and a plastic casing.
@@michaelcolbourn6719 again, intent matter, they indented to cause destructions, just because the failed at it does not change what their actions where.
paint will wash off of you if you get in a bath, does that mean people can throw it at you in the first place?
The fact is, actions have consequences, and these immature examples needed to have discipline, obviously they have grown up and was not given enough Vitamin N.. being told NO !
But isn’t that sunflower oil ?
OIL IS EVIL
Yes, my faith in humanity is restored 🙏🙏
This is JSO throwing a tantrum in response to 2 of thier activists receiving prison sentences.
They are noble human beings.
Targeting an artist with a disability.
Make sure to add a goofy emoticon to imply sarcasm next time. :^)
SOUP YOU MUTHERSOUPERS!!!
Destruction of valuable property is not an activist action it’s just spoiled kids wanting attention
Nothing was destroyed. And yes, they want attention. That's how activism works. You can't change systems in obscurity.
Their mom's can have that sewing room now .
why attack oil paintings over motor oil?
I think it's all about the soup...the art is just a cunning distraction
Security needs sacking
Nothing has been affected - soup poured on glass - establishment is being ridiculous
Who do they think they are destroying art. Send them all to jail
They didn't destroy anything.
What? Why? This is criminal damage. Lock them all up. Fools!
Wood chipper?
Those idiots, what the picture did to anything
Make it 20 years and maybe, just maybe, we might be onto something
Not enough. I suggest forced labor so tax payers don't have to pay for the damage.
They all look the same. A bit of make up wouldn’t hurt.
Start by wearing make up yourself.
So double the sentences😊
just keep oil
go vegan
Van Gough behind glass. He only sold one or two paintings in his lifetime but someone is making millions from him. If that's not exploitation, what is, eh?
Doesn't change the fact that he USED OIL
Bellends
reported for hate speech
@@agreeable-youth get in there cupcake 😱
Give then 20 years they will never do it again
The definition of insanity - doing the same acts of criminal damage and expecting a different outcome. These three can follow their two imprisoned fellow-tracellers.
How many times did the suffragettes have to pull their stunts before things changed for women?
Maybe they used a different flavour of soup which raised expectations of a different outcome. I've heard that under the right conditions French Onion soup can cross the blood brain barrier and we're all aware of the psychotic events that Ham Hock and Pea created for so many festival goers back in the 60s
2 years is nothing. And it won't prevent anything.
2 years will translate to 1 year at most, probably 8 months as we need to get people out of our over crowded jails to make room for people who speak unkindly on social media.
Given it's the only place in the UK where adult education is free, a criminal record might be something our youngsters should consider as a better life choice than 80k student debt.
Not political prisoners more like terrorists.
Was it cos he used oil paints...and whats the symbolism of soup ? does like Mullagawtny represent an escalation as opposed to say Scotch Broth or is this a means of combining a dislike of Van Gough and soup regardless of its flavour in one act.
Go on them a stand do you come down in a gas guzzling car or would you eat in your electric car who is making a statement?
guess thease will get 3 years
Is that vegan teacher?
Two years up her shiter. Ouch!