"Albus Severus Potter, you are named after two wizards, both who were murdered right in front of me while I was still a child. In fact, from my fourth year onward, my every year at Hogwarts was filled with murder and death and it was only luck that stopped me and everyone around me from dying in my first three years. Before that I was raised by my abusive aunt and uncle who beat me and forced me to live under the stairs. But don't worry about all that. Please, go on with your worries about how your childhood will be ruined if you're sorted into Slytherin."
Sergeant Johnson You'd think hogwarts would mount machine guns on the roof or something when they became aware of the impending invasion.... Oh look! A swam of idiots charging us! Let's mow them down....
Sergeant Johnson And now you're giving me flashbacks to that god-awful Harry Potter fanfiction "My Immortal" where they use guns instead of wands, everyone is a vampire-goth-satanist whose parents "committed suicide by slitting their wrists", and anyone who doesn't think that Gerard Way is the sexiest thing ever is a "prep" and worse than Hitler.
How Voldemort should have hidden horcruxes: 1 - Throw in ocean. 2 - Sneak into McDonalds kitchen. (It'll either end up in a random person's house or a garbage heap) 3 - Chuck through a person's window. 4 - Throw onto a boat. 5 - Hide in long grass. 6 - Under a bunch of rocks. 7 - In sewer. BONUS - Turn a needle into a horcrux and drop in a haystack.
In the book it is explained that the tiara was protected with spells, so you couldn't use the Accio spell. I guess it was also immune from the requirement room
Elisa Risconti the books do not matter. If you have a movie that is entirely dependent on the books to answer all the questions the movie isn't doing a good job at movie-ing
Cactus Cow you are right, I also think that cause otherwise it doesn't make sense to make a movie. I just gave the information. I also don't like how Rowling explains things in the interviews or through questions by the fans. She was supposed to explain the rules/plot/characters clearly during the book.
Mike Cornell do you even know what kind of images I have in my head because of the books xD I read them in finnish, so translation might be little off, but harry is in 7th book like "are you saying that voldemort is hiding behind a dumpster and waiting that he could jump out and knock me out cold" or something xD oh dear.
Actually, it should be more sinned, but not for geeking out. Powerful spells require practice. There is no way McGonagall used it for the first time then and there.
@@Merlin7 she's an incredible witch especially when it comes to transfiguration/charms. I don't think she'd need practice, even for a spell that is that grand.
@@Merlin7 prof mcgonagall was a master of transfiguration( she was the teacher too) she was the one who brought the giant chess pieces to life in the sorcercer's/philosopher's stone too.
@@shihoinyoruich3780 I've read the books over a dozen times. I know them by heart. Every professor at Hogwarts would have been taught security procedures and basic spells when they were hired. They would have practiced them that year. It's ridiculous to think otherwise.
Something I noticed a few years ago: That scene where Professor McGonagall sends the Slytherins "to the dungeons" is actually not so dramatic when you remember that their common room is in the dungeons. So rather then it sounding like she is sending them to magic school-prison, actually this is the equivalent of sending them to their rooms lol
Considering how many tricks the twin actors played, including switching roles on set, I see Jeremy's point. In fact, the books make it seem like Harry can consistently and easily tell the twins apart, BEFORE George lost part of his ear. How?
When I was in high school, I got into a fight with someone and everybody in campus gathered around to see it... But when Harry and Voldemort were having their epic wand battle, there was not a single soul watching it.... I don't think they know how schools work..
Yes! The book had such a nice pay-off. It was in the Great Hall, everybody was watching. Before Harry killed Voldemort, he explained to him exactly why he had failed in his plan. Then he killed him within a second. And there were all these people cheering, the first morning sunrays hit the scene... It was perfect. I was so pissed with this movie. I'm sure it was not a bad movie at all, it was just really dissapointing to me in so many moments. Also missing: Voldemort paralyzing Neville, placing the sorting hat on his head and putting it on fire. Why would Bellatrix, Nagini or Voldemort crumble and fall apart when being killed? Why would Voldemort ever use his hands to fight?
Crazy Jolteon Albus was a manipulative old man who kept a lot of secrets from Harry that could've helped him. Snape was an unapologetic abuser of his students simply because he couldn't get into Harry's mother's pants and then she died. Just because he went through some emotional trauma it shouldn't have affected his teaching duties.
I don't think he ever really wanted to teach, even tho he was good in that area. Slughorn's departure and him switching sides gave Dumbledore a reason to have him close. I think they planned for Harry's arrival early. And Snape's behavior had authenticity but also was staged (or exaggerated) because he would walk the finest of lines given Harry's connection to Voldemort.
There was once this time in high school when the Harry Potter hype was still a thing and I remember this kid was avoiding spoilers from the first movie as he wanted to see both parts in one. Then another guy went up to him and whispered, "Dobby dies", and he flipped out. We didn't see him for weeks. Figured that was worth sharing.
Haedox I had a friend who skipped to the end of the sixth book to find out what happens (he didn't really care about HP) then he drove by borders where there was still a line outside and screamed out his window that Dumbledore dies.
2:55 The reason they are being asked for Bellatrix's wand in the first place is because it is known to be stolen. Presenting Bellatrix's wand here, to goblins who've been briefed to look out for it, is tantamount to saying, 'Please arrest us immediately. And while we're talking, I'd like my room in Azkaban to have a sea view, regular bread and water, with hot and cold running Dementors, please.' Overconfident sinning is overconfident.
Then why doesn't Hermoine as Bellatrix immediately reply "my wand was stolen". You might say they she didn't know it was stolen but if that's the case then why didn't she present it?
The movie doesn't do a good job at explaining that though. What's more, even in-book it's not that solid, because if someone was going to impersonate Bellatrix, they'd likely try to do a good job of it, and the real Bellatrix wouldn't present her wand to a goblin, or anyone aside from Voldemort really.
It *Was,* Idiot! The Book - Not so much the movie - has Harry himself explain to Voldemort that when he, Harry, sacrificed himself, Lily's protective magic protected everyone!!
I’m not surprised CinemaSins doesn’t understand....the movies do a terrible job of explaining that whole concept or why it matters in the Battle of Hogwarts. The movies leave out or skip over so much that they can be borderline incoherent if you’ve not already read the books. And that’s just crappy filmmaking
to anyone who don't get it, harry in the book let him avada himself to protect everyone from voldemort and his deatheaters, but I'm not sure how does it makes sense considering how it had affected harry
Exactly, Cinema Sins have never taken time to try to understand what some of these things means. Like about how he would never understand why snape put the sword in lestranges vault. Also he doesn’t understand the non verbal spells and the use of wands and how they are a way to transfer magic. It’s annoying when people have no clue what they talk about
@@Positivekitten I think they suspected that the goblins knew it had been stolen but weren't 100% certain. Plus in theory she should have been locked in Malfoy Manor with all the others who let Harry escape.
I never argue Sins, but doesn't Harry literally say to Ron seconds before/after (can't remember), "they know the wand was stolen". Doesn't that answer the "why Hermione won't show her wand" question?
They also explain that Voldemort's name has a spell on it so that anyone who uses it gets tracked and that you can't disapperate into or out of Gringot's just in previous movies.
Chris Bir Actually, they only explain it in the deleted scenes. If you've not read the book, you have no way of understanding. (Why that was more expendable than the dancing scene, I'll never know.)
You've seen the Lego HP in 90 seconds? I loved that! Harry: Well 8 films, and a stage play. What next? Hermione: (Reading Fantastic beasts} I think they should make a film series based on this text book!
Another sin. Voldemort is pretty fond of the Avada Kedavra curse, yet somehow doesn't use it on Snape, for no purpose other than to make it possible for Harry to collect his tears.
Rasus The Fuckface There is a legitimate reason for that: the wand's owner cannot be killed by their own wand. So since Voldemort believes Snape owns the Elder Wand, he resorts to slitting his throat and letting Nagini finish him instead. As for Harry, since he now believes he is the master, he uses AK, only to destroy the Horcrux part leaving Harry intact and in Limbo.
Eh not really. The room of requirement was supposed to be a room that its interior would suit the needs of the person about to enter. For example dumbledore once really needed to go to the bathroom and came across it, or in half blood prince harry and ginny really needed a room to hide the book. That room became the "lost and forgotten" room. Sure its very likely that some people dumped their old brooms there, but 3 convenient brooms conveniently placed next to them when they needed them the most? No thats just some plot device bullshit, otherwise the diadem should had been in front of harry as soon as he steps in, or like cinemasins has said multiple times why is there any conflict in the magic world when (and if) a room like that exists?
DashCat9 I know, right? Such complete BS. Just because you've heard a few random words in an obscure language you probably have never tried to learn even a few words of, doesn't mean you can string together even one coherent sentence and expect anyone (even a magic gate) to understand it. And it was even in the books. Frustrating.
***** You only need to speak one word, what you say doesn't have to make sense. Theoretically if someone with no knowledge of the language would say at least one word if they whisper long enough.
Pokemonfox4 I thought that one needs to say "Open" to the entrance to make it open up. That is definitely what I remember from the books, and the Harry Potter Wikia also confirms that. I mean, the gate would be pretty dysfunctional if any random hissing noise had a good chance of triggering it to open. What Ron was trying to do was essentially like knowing the letters that the language uses and trying to build random words out of them. The "monkeys banging on typewriters" analogy springs to mind.
Sinning Cinema Sins for sinning thew idea that a Horcrux can't be made out of a living thing after we have established that the snake, a living thing, is a Horcrux.
they didnt say it CAN'T be made out of a living thing, they are saying it shouldn't have HAD to latch on to a living thing when his spell went off, as Dumbledore CLEARLY implied. Meaning it could have easily latched onto anything from Harry's room. A book, a piece of paper etc... Even then you could prolly ignore that by saying something like "oh well he used a spell on a living person, thus the spell rebounding would obviously attach to a living thing if possible."
Elijah Talmud yes thank you! I'm all for naming a child after someone you loved (for example when I have a daughter I am naming her Nora after my grandmother whom I loved) but there are some names you just don't do and that is one of them. His second kid James was a little better since James is a better name than Albus
Elijah Talmud They mean you spelled it wrong. It's Severus (it's latin), and the name was also in the books, so the movie isn't writing fan fiction in this particular case. Now you can hate the name, some book readers do too.
Oh no, I knew that they were getting at. It was a typo I didn't care to correct. And it appears you misunderstood what I was getting at. That name is absolutely cringeworthy and sounds like something a teenage girl scribbled on her tumblr.
If I were Harry, at the end of the battle, before cracking the wand I would used it to repair the entire Howarts, or at least the bridge or Hagrid's hut
He's riding a high right now. He's pretty much won at this point since his nemesis for 17 years is dead. He's pretty much gloating by letting Neville say his bit.
"My God, Voldemort just used a lot of his power and cracked his wand destroying our deadly force-field!" "Can't we just put it back up again?" "Nah, that's too easy"
MZG20 Well it took them long enough to arrive in the movie. At least a good 3/4 of the army would have been cut off considering it only took them about 20 secs to put it up
James Gibblesghotten Yes :). In some old strategy computer games, there was a simple defense trick: just dedicate some of your workers to constantly building walls and towers behind more walls and towers. They should have at least tried to use some wizards to just make force field bubbles inside force field bubbles, until V-t got magic arm/tongue muscle cramps destroying them.
From the books: The room only opens if you need it AND it contains exactly what you need inside it, except for edible stuff. But this is cinemasins, not booksins, so: "The books don't matter"
nothing could also be an emotional person (probably teenager), as magic can also derive from emotion. Remember back in book/movie 1 when harry made the glass disapepar? no wand. no incantation. Just emotion. He wasn't a pro. just emotional.
Sin 52: Here's how I like to label thd Hogwarts houses... Gryffendor: The Special Snowflakes Ravenclaw: At Least We're Not Hufflepuff Hufflepuff: Cannon Fodder Slytherin: You Are Eleven Years Old and We've Already Decided You're Evil
Bleeters Seeing how she was born on April 19, 1990. She's been legally 'hot' since April 19, 2008. Which in the line of Harry Potter movies puts it around the recording of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.
DriftKingNL "Legally hot"? Is that another horrible Legally Blonde sequel? Bleeters They (frickin' finally) declared her hot in the last video and also they sinned the fact that she didn't go topless in this one.
if the movies represent the books they should have hit all the key plot points and there would have been no plot holes but the wand points will always have plot holes
2:33 If you payed attention, in part 1 before they showed the engraved “mudblood” on poor Hermione, you can see her tracking Bella’s hair as it falls on her upper arm.
Harry Potter movies in a nutshell: Sorcerers Stone - cute 11 year olds in wizard school Chamber of secrets - scary pipe in the bathroom leads to certain death but 12 year olds are able to get in somehow (hogwarts how many lawsuits do you have) Prisoner of askaban - time travel and just kinda wack but we here for it Goblet of fire - stop fighting with ron harry Order of the Phoenix - Harry’s one chance of having a god father must die of course Half blood prince - let’s finally get to the climax of this story and kill another one of the beloved characters DH part 1 - harry x Hermione DH part 2 - world is obviously going to be saved since this is the last movie, time to bring out the innocence of all the-so called evil characters
@@alwaysseverus741 I don't remember any such rules about having to know how to make the stuff inside it. Hogwarts probably wouldn't allow a portkey off the premises, but I see no reason it wouldn't allow one to the outside of the room of requirement
@@SomeNiceMovies, unfortunately, they'd need permission from the MoM to create a portkey and then it would take a while to actually create said portkey. However, considering the emergency and the state of the MoM, an exception could be made for the permission issue. There's really no working around how long it takes to create one. Hmmm. It's a bit of a puzzle there.
2:32 in the previous movie, just after Bellatrix finishes torturing Hermione and she's like crying, you can see a hair fall onto her, and she watches it.
JK Rawling has said many times that scene involvingv Hagrid carrying "dead" Harry into Hogwarts, was the first scene she envisioned when she started writing Harry Potter books. Since it was Hagrid who brought Harry into wizard world, it was very logical that he also brings him back into it. She has also said many times that the only character she knew would survive the end for sure was Hagrid for exactly that purpose.
Miroslav Tomic It has been stated in the books that Hagrid had a resistance to magic because of his giant blood. They probably tried killing him, but it failed.
What I've always wondered is do Bullets work on Wizards. I mean that scene in the woods what if you had a bunch of snipers just shoot at Voldemort and their minions, would they dodge it? would they instantly be protected? are they bullet proof? something that I've always wondered about
JaxBlade In the books, its kinda assumed that wizards could just block the bullets, but I think in real life, bullets could work if they didn't suspect them. But, it would probably be easy to cure bullet wounds...
The Zecromancer I don't think you could do any kind of spell before a bullet would reach them at close range, like in the last fight scene Voldemort could have pulled a gun on harry and harry couldn't do shit to stop it, boom end of movie Voldemort wins.
The Zecromancer I don't think you could do any kind of spell before a bullet would reach them at close range, like in the last fight scene Voldemort could have pulled a gun on harry and harry couldn't do shit to stop it, boom end of movie Voldemort wins.
The Zecromancer i vaguely remember a character (probably Mr. Weasley) mention the muggles having 'silver wands' that they point at people then die, so given their knowledge of rubber ducks, I'd doubt the most they'd know is 'that thing is bad' Although, given the intelligence of the villains in this series, they'd probably think a muggle couldn't hurt them and then get shot whilst laughing or something
For everyone arguing about books The books don't matter because the movie does a poor job of translating or explaining things compared to the book so the movie deserves to be sinned, he's not sinning the books
The people who made the movies should just actually read the books instead of having them vaguely described while on crack, because i could have made these movies 100000 times better than this disrespecful pile of shit of a series. And yeah i did read the books hundreds of times as a kid
Um no you couldn’t...the movie received a 96% from critics most of which didn’t read the books. If you think you could make a better movie than one of the highest rated movies in history without any experience, you must not have very many brain cells
Even the books aren't immune. Rowling should not have included devices like Time Turner or the Liquid Luck. Those raises more questions than resolves conflict.
I am currently watching through all of CS's videos This is the best Sentence ending (that does not include bonus rounds). Best "sentence", anyway. By far
Can just say how fucking PISSED I am at how they cut down the battle between Molly and Bellatrix? Like, I get time constraints and all. But in the books, these two witches fought so fiercely that the ground cracked! It was huge and epic and dramatic and it showcased not only Bellatrix as Voldemort's best fighter (which she was), but Molly as the absolute, badass powerhouse that I had been waiting to see for all seven books! And they cut it down to THIS little, thirty-second bit. Not to mention all of the other awesome bits from the Battle of Hogwarts that they left out... Don't get me wrong, Harry Potter is my jam, but they could have done so much better.
It is a poorly written movie. That was the point of my comment. A movie version of a book is always horrible by comparison. The source matters. The source always matters. So yes the books matter. If you can say they don't obviously you're just a troll, and I shouldn't be wasting my time talking to you.
Spoler alert !! Special deleted scene include : Voldemort grew tired waiting harry to show up, ordered super mega size meal for him & nagini, after harry suddenly show up, he stuffed a mouthful bite of burger & fries, before casting the spell Voldemort : "OOOVOOODAA KOOODAAAVROO !!"
Lol yeah why didn’t he turn a napkin in to a horcrux and throw it away. It couldn’t be destroyed so it would just be an indestructible napkin that Harry would never know about.
You forgot the Cho Chang, who is a year older than Harry, is standing with the students, with her f`ing uniform on. I don`t know about you, but I`m pretty sure there is no such thing as an 8th year😣😣😣😣😣😣😣😈
Nicholas Truman nope the scene where they’re in malfoy’s manor and bellatrix tortures hermione is in the 7th movie and the 8th movie starts with them brewing the potion. So I do think it’s u reasonable to remember one strand of fucking hair fall to hermione we were too busy being hurt by her screams NO I WONT SHUT UP
@@kristen1684 The hair fell on her while Bellatrix was busy scolding the other Death Eaters. This was the perfect opportunity for Hermione to tuck the hair in a pocket or something, and she exploited said opportunity.
+Skyebright1 Nope. According to the chapter 30 of the last book no student in Slytherin helped Harry fight the Voldemort and his minions. There were few from Ravenclaw, a dozen or so from Hufflepuff and a half from Griffindor.
Arko777777 If I was in that position and I knew my family and friends were fighting, I would rather go down to the dungeons and do nothing than risk getting them in more trouble
I hated how Professor Mcgonagall sent all the Slytherins into the dungeon just because Pansy told someone to get Harry. What if some Slytherins wanted to fight against Voldemort but they weren't given the chance to prove that not all Slytherins are bad?
My girlfriend actually made a good point about putting the Slytherins in the dungeon (not that the filmmakers were thinking this, but still): regardless of how you feel about Slytherin, it's an objective fact that a *lot* of them have Death Eater parents. That doesn't mean that the kids are evil, but do you really want to force them to choose between trying to kill their dad or being labeled a coward for not fighting?
Considering several Slytherin children had relatives and parents and friends fighting alongside Voldemort, it was mostly to protect the children themselves.
Not to be that person that's like "WELL IN THE BOOK", but once people realize that Voldemort is coming to Hogwarts all the students are woken up and gather at their house tables in the Great Hall. Professor McGonagall makes an announcement about evacuations and about staying, if you're of age, to fight against the Death Eaters and Voldemort. So most of the students evacuate but there are still groups that stay behind from gryffindor, hufflepuff, and ravenclaw because they're old enough. BUT. THE ENTIRE SLYTHERIN TABLE IS ABANDONED. So I totally get how you're saying that she should have given some Slytherins the chance to prove that not all of them are bad, but all of them were bad or taught that they were bad because THEY ALL LEFT to go join the death eaters or their parents to be on the bad side lol.
You are correct - the Ministry put a Taboo on the name, so whenever it was said, all protective enchantments are broken and whoever said the name can be taken in. However, this was never explained in the movies.
Also, when Ron said "if we did for them Harry, I'm going to kill you!" Let's just take you back to the first movie when Ron said "sort out her priorities!"
I don't know, I watched it the other day, and I never heard them say that they can't say Voldemort. They just swapped back to calling him You Know Who. And a movie based on a book that's split into two parts (especially since the 7th book isn't that large) really shouldn't leave out details expecting you to have read the book. If any of the movies should've been split into two parts, it was the 5th. That book was fucking enormous.
The sword isn't magic, okay it is enchanted to be able to appear out of nowhere, but it is not stronger or better than any other muggle-sword. "The question of why a wizard would need a sword, though often asked, is easily answered. In the days before the International Statute of Secrecy, when wizards mingled freely with Muggles, they would use swords to defend themselves just as often as wands. Indeed, it was considered unsporting to use a wand against a Muggle sword (which is not to say it was never done). Many gifted wizards were also accomplished duellists in the conventional sense, Gryffindor among them."
The sword absord all the upgrades, that's the reason the sword can destroy an horcrux. This is an overpower sword final point. J.K Rolling like Tolkien doesn't know how to write without Deus Ex Machina.
You know what HP movie needed a two parter? Goblet of Fire. Damn book was huge, with lots of junk. Think about it, we could have had part 1 end with Harry's name popping out of the goblet. And then we could have had some actual scenes of the World Cup in part 1 making the whole thing much better.
@@hithere4289 If we can have three parters out of a single book a quarter the size of GoF, surely people would watch HP regardless of one of the middle books in the series being a two parter?
@@Darkgun231 Pretty sure Harry Potter book fans would rush to watch a 100 part any-book film but remember film directors mainly aim mainstream masses to watch it so I don't think they would invest that much money only on hardcore fans :p
@@hithere4289 Wasn't the HP fanbase the mainstream audience? It was the most popular book series the world over for a long time. Plus, tell me you can't see greedy directors splitting single books into multiple movies for more ticket sales. Most people would still watch 'em, honestly, because the masses tend to be... gullible I think is the kindest way to refer to them.
I remember reading a post on Tumblr (I know, I know) that this girl had skipped to the last page of the book because she couldn't wait to see what happened, and it says something about Ginny giving Albus a kiss goodbye, and of course at this point she didn't know Ginny and Harry named their son Albus, and thought that Ginny was having a relationship with back from the dead Dumbledore and was so fucking confused.
dumpling dump parts of Tumblr are great, like the Harry Potter fandom, but other parts are really toxic, and there is a pretty bad reputation of Tumblr as a whole.
Fun fact there is a trace on the word “Voldemort” In the deathly Hallows. That is how the two death eaters found them in that small shop after the wedding. And also how the snatchers found them in the forest when they took them to the manor. So that is why harry is using you know who because then they couldn’t be tracked
And the fact they inexplicably stop using Voldemort's name despite them happily using it throughout all the other films. In fairness it's a sin in the books too because they go several weeks never saying Voldemort's name because Ron gets all huffy whenever they begin to say it, then they conveniently do say it when a little action is needed.
@@semanticsamuel936 No it's not. Even if the name had the trace on it during the previous books, Voldemort was not in power so he couldn't just break down the door and kill them now could he?
@@haashgaminglol7848 Not during previous books/films, but in Deathly Hallows itself. Remember that they're happily saying his name, then get caught out by Death Eaters at the café, then inexplicably stop using his name well before they know about the Taboo. In the books, Ron becomes paranoid about them using it...for some reason, and makes them shut up whenever they're about to say it (until they don't, and get caught out again).
Oh that explanation makes sense. I never read the books nor have any desire to but the use/non-use of his name though was very inconsistent in the films I thought
Before breaking it? He never breaks the wand in the book! He keeps it back in Dumbledore's grave so that when Harry would die, the Elder Wand wouldn't have an owner, hence it's power would be insignificant
Ethan Joe and Chris Ayers we are talking abaut the movie, how they not including the plot line of the book in which Harry fixes his broken wand whit the wand of dumbledore.
Do you want to know the biggest problem with Harry Potter and the deathly hallows part 2... They are too dark for you to even see half of what's happening 😂
then you either need your eyes tested or to adjust the settings on your tv... looks perfectly fine to me whenever I watch it, I never have trouble making anything out.
That might be true but I think the reason she didn't present the wand because Bellatrix would never do something like that. The bitch was really pompous.
That's not why Hermione didn't show the wand. Otherwise she wouldn't have brought Bellatrix's wand with her to the bank, which she did. But yes, you are correct that that's the LOGICAL reason for her not to do it, but alas these movies are not logical at all.
Blindness makes it incapable of feeling people riding it? Or maybe you mean the previous sequence where the dragonfire should have superheated the whole area and cooked everyone regardless if the dragon was aiming at them?
Since I had to leave about 50 comments for the previous HP video, here is a list of all of my comments: -Dumbledore said that there was no spell or enchantment to bring people (or anything, for that matter) back to life. -The sword is impregnated with Basilisk venom, making it a powerful weapon. Need I explain further? -You can still USE wands from others, but the magic won't be as powerful. -The dragon is blind and couldn't feel them. -They said You-Know-Who because the word 'Voldemort' was cursed so that Death Eaters would find you when you say it. -SLYTHERIN IS NOT FUCKING EVIL. IT'S THE HOUSE OF AMBITION AND CUNNING. NOT EVIL. -Ron copied what Harry said for the locket to open. -The Elder Wand worked like a normal wand. If he unlocked its full power, then it would be THE most powerful wand in history. -In the book, both Harry and Lily's eyes were green and almond-shaped. Fuck movies for changing appearances, eh? -YOU SAYIN' DAT NAGINI AIN'T LIVIN'? * ahem * Are you saying that Nagini wasn't living? SNAKES ARE LIVING, SENTIENT BEINGS THANK YOU VERY MUCH. Horcruxes usually aren't assigned to living things because they're very hard to... Well, you know. -It's 'the power of love' or some sloppy cliche thing like that which saved Harry. Not a fucking spell. I saved you from having to scroll through 394 comments. You're welcome.
Sky Dayer Even if some of them were only in the books, people should still read the books first. Movies are an addon to the book; not a standalone copy.
GrimSleeper Peter Pettigrew. PETER. FUCKING. PETTIGREW. Oh, so it's not evil to be a Death Eater and betray your best friends by fucking causing their deaths? And Snape was not evil. And Merlin was the greatest wizard of all time. And Salazar Slytherin wasn't evil either. Draco is not evil. Plenty of Slytherins aren't evil, and plenty of non-Slytherins are evil.
You missed the awesome part where Snape not only blocks Mcgonagall's attack but in the same movement takes out the two dark wizards behind him whilst continuing the fight as if it wasn't him. Surely that's -1 sin?
Look closely. Snape reflects the shots in their direction on purpose and looking even closer you can see that he takes their wands with him. He killed them, not Minerva.
Probably not cannon but my belief is that Voldemort needed to know where the Hocruxes were to use them again, so they can't just be randomly buried or in the middle of the sea or something. Also I think it would need to be somewhere secret as people would 'feel' the evil prescience. And lastly, it needs to be a powerful object to maintain the soul part. The diary, harry, and nagini are the only ones that aren't really and I that can probably be explained away with emotional magic(put his feelings in the diary, love/hate in making harry, something something snakes for nagini)
Snoopy They couldn't have just digitally altered them? I mean, all that SFX budget money, and they chose NOT to input Harry Potter's most important feature.
Something that bothers me here and it is when he sins Hermione for getting the Bellatrix hair. There is a specific scene in part one that shows the hair float to her and it's not even that subtle. The scene is basically saying, "HEY, THIS IS IMPORTANT AND YOU SHOULD PROBABLY REMEMBER THIS FOR LATER." Don't get me wrong, I love CinemaSins, but this is just plain lazy.
I agree, but I must add that I've seen this movie 1000 times and it wasn't until the 1001 time viewing this movie that I actually saw the hair scene, they probably just overlooked it, they are human, but that is a sin lol
DarylAndrea Yeah, I agree with you. They are human, but since their channel is all about nit picking I thought I would call them out on it since the movies did account for it :P
Will Tenenbaum i think he doesn't understand the whole thing completely since he is talking about the fourth movie where Voldemort is brought back to full form using Harry's blood, Peters hand and one of his fathers bones. they wouldn't need to find the sand piece, just whatever living thing your soul is now clinging to for life (like what happened to the first defense against the dark arts teacher in the first movie)
“Man.. if Only I knew which Weasley this was...I might feel bad about this” with the amount of tricks Oliver and James did on set, I’m not surprised. It took me a good few months to figure out who was who, sometimes I *still* can’t figure out which is which. But just a heads up that is Fred
the reason they didn't use the mind controlling spell was because it was Imperio, one of the forbidden curses. If they used it in the previous movies they would get severely punished for it but now the ministry is being controlled by voldemort and harry can finally use spells without being found out his whereabouts
TheCrazyBrittish Eeyupp. I still think it should be a 47 behind Avada Kedevra. How awesome would it be to shorten the ultimate death spell with "AK 47" ?
+Dóbby Zabina Only because Crabbe wasn't even in the film. The actor got done for drugs or something, hence why he doesn't appear in the last 3 or so films
+elijah ”Bulbamew” handley He was selling marijana and used it. I already know that. Since it happened.. But the thing is, why change the death of someone else, when J.K Rowling has been confiming that Goyle has kids 19 years in the future... They changed Dumbledore after second movie, since the first actor died. They could have done the same with Crabbe. It just mess up everything.
Dóbby Zabina Probably just because Crabbe and Goyle weren't major characters. Rowling was part of the writing of the final films, she would have changed it if she disagreed so she obviously wasn't too bothered about Goyle dying instead
@Kevin Sundelin Nope, Snape just left Harry there. Sirius showed up and was the one who took Harry outside. He lent Hagrid his bike and gave him Harry, then went to hunt down Pettigrew.
(I didn't read the book). I would argue that it was a matter of priorities. Snape cared about Lily. As far as he's concerned, Harry (or everything else) was not important. Some people just don't care to get involved. Just 2 months ago, there was a security footage of 2 old women (60ish) being attacked with a cinder block at their own liquor store. And you can see a customer sneaking away while the women were being attacked. That was not the first time something like that happens. And it won't be the last. Some people just don't care enough to get involved. Now that I think about it. It's also possible that Snape didn't want people to know he helps. He was a part of Voldermort's posse. He can't let it get out that he helped Harry. th-cam.com/video/5NiGW3-xBwI/w-d-xo.html
@@elsonlam okay but that's grown women who could maybe take care of themselves until help got there or was called or something. Even people who claim to not like other people would say you're on your own to them would usually not leave a little baby by themselves to possibly die like that. And we know Snape is somehow good at least a little bit and cared about Lily. So it really is bullshit that he just ignored the crying baby. completely. I
@@mariahdibben4066 But you're talking about complete strangers. If Voldermort finds out Snape helps, it wouldn't end well for him. Another thing to consider is that Snape loved Lily. Her lifeless body could have devastating effect on him that he momentary makes bad decisions. For him, at that time, nothing means anything.
I would sin the fact that Avada Kedavra is a forbidden spell and everything but we see Molly killing Bellatrix with other spells so why is this different? It's just murder with extra steps
The killing curse kills everything about you. Had a moving painting of yourself? Not anymore. Want to travel as a ghost? Haha, you can thank the killing curse that you can't.
Th killing curse is used ONLY to kill, which is why it is an unforgivable curse. Other spells can possibly kill you, but their purpose isn't only to kill.
Felipe E. Thing is, something like, say, Diffindo, can be used without killing someone - or even for ordinary purposes. Stupefy can be used to kill too, e.g. knocking someone off their broom midair - but that’s no cause to ban stupefy. On the other hand, the three unforgivable curses are solely for - well - _unforgivable_ purposes: to kill, torture and control the will of others.
Curryman91 Thats bullshit snape kills Dumbledore with the avada kedavra and Dumbledore still has a moving picture of him in the principals room. Dont know about ghosts tho
YIINX yes, and because she died for him. And it's so funny he said "this should have been cast on everybody at hogwarts" when it actually was the case once Harry sacrified for them. A lot is explained in the book but sadly not in the movies
I thought the same xD When he said that "this should have been cast on everybody", I thought: what do you want to do?? Gather all their parents and make them throw themselves at you while you try to kill their kids with an unforgivable curse??
It was cast on everyone, that's why in the books voldermort couldn't silence everyone permanently, they were protected. Harry sacrificed himself as his mother did, which gave everyone that same protection spell.
I love the split in the comments here. Everyone is either pissed at CinemaSins for "bashing" Harry Potter, or appreciating them for the sins that are mostly validated. Can't there be a mix of both? I love the Harry Potter movies and would defend them as good movies till the day I die, but these videos are so funny to me and I can't help but agree with a lot of points made in them.
You showed your hand with how you split the groups. One is "whiny HP fanboys pissed at CS for bashing HP when it's all explained in the books" and the other is "whiny CS fanboys screaming SATIRE! You don't get CS! Books don't matter." Both are equally nauseating.
I love Harry Potter but not the movies. The movies (except for 1, 2, and 7 part 1) are crap. They remove over half of what was in the books and destroy the entire spirit of the series. If anything, CS should sin the movies even more (+1000) for not following the books at all.
Well theres a couple things that dont make sense. For instance, he sinned them saying "you know who" after they've said Voldemort in the previous movie. well in the last movie its fairly obvious, and they figured it out, that voldemort put a spell on his name. He would know the exact location of anyone who said his name since they would be deemed a threat, and he knew harry would say his name. Its explained in the movies and the book because the death eaters found them after the wedding, so there is absolutely no reason to sin that at all. Now is love CS to death and love their humor, but cmon some of this was pure ignorance to the movies...
Albus Severus Voldemort Hagrid Draco Mcgonagall Gryffindor Quddictch Seeker Granger Weasly Potter Jr. That right there sums up everything about harry potter and thats also the new name of his son because..i said so
Albus Severus Rubeus Draco Godric Cedric Dean Thomas Griphook Neville REMUS Potter Jr. Because what about poor Moony? Harry names his kids after his dad, his godfather, his headmaster/mentor/grandfather-figure, and the fucking potions master that loved his mom? ok i get naming a kid after snape, but you'd think the mentor/uncle?-figure/man who made you his own kid's freaking godfather! would get priority. Couldn't JK have given them a another kid named like Arthur Remus, or Rubeus Remus, or idk, Dobby Remus? Dobby Remus Potter. Has a nice ring to it actually. Also, Lily Luna, named after his mom and... a friend that was kind of helpful? and happens to still be alive, making her the only one to be named after a living person, which is fine, there aren't really a lot of dead women in Harry's life, but she could have been Lily Nymphadora? no nvm that's sounds dumb. If we're going with living people then what it SHOULD have been was Lily Molly, or even Lily Minerva. Hell "Minerva" is a nice echo of "Ginevra" so if JK wanted to have a Lily Luna, why couldn't she make a Minerva Molly too? They could even call her "Minny" Ok, new official canon, Harry and Ginny had five kids: James Sirius, Albus Severus, Lily Luna, Dobby Remus and Minerva Molly.
Sasha , get an oversized magnetic. or Make spell that let's you attract metallic objects of certain size/shape/weight to the tip of your wand. Because an someone forced the truth out of you by "imperio".....
I think the issue with this is that horcruxes must be accessed by someone who is alive, so he couldn't just make a rock and throw it into the ocean as no one would be able to use it to bring him back to life.
@@harshivpatel6238 If you use 'imperio' it just physically makes him do what you want. Not access memorys. If you want that you have to use Veritasetum a, potion.
@@jasonm7684 Not necessarily. You can if you want to you just can't access it. Dumbledore explains that he wanted to access it in case he wanted to move it or something of the sort.
@@Josh-mc6cb nope, imperio gives control over mind and mind is free to obey or not obey (amount dependent on subject's mental strenght) body is still controlled by subject but mind is subverted to do as curse caster asks, thus one can play with subject's mind, and thus extract information without torture, of course not everybody would be skilled enough at the curse to successfully do it by imperio but, the control is over mind and not body, read the book 4 where it's used multiple times, body doesn't move without bodyowner's wish, mind is manipulated to think that doing as caster asks is the right thing to do.
@@dogsdreamtoo8427 No one on Earth was suggesting that, so clearly *you* connected the idea of The Real Slim Shadow knowing his name, and The Real Slim Shadow being smart.
Voldemort: OAAAAAAVRAAADAAAA
Hermione: stop stop stop stop, your going to take someone’s eye out! Besides, your saying it wrong
this genuinely made me laugh
This is under appreciated 😂😂😂
Surya Suresh it’s AVADA KADAVRA! Plot twist: Hermoine kills Voldemort
Actually I'm pretty sure if you say that spell wrong your wand blows you up.
@@speedrunn4321 well really its whatever they're saying in their head haha
"Albus Severus Potter, you are named after two wizards, both who were murdered right in front of me while I was still a child. In fact, from my fourth year onward, my every year at Hogwarts was filled with murder and death and it was only luck that stopped me and everyone around me from dying in my first three years. Before that I was raised by my abusive aunt and uncle who beat me and forced me to live under the stairs.
But don't worry about all that. Please, go on with your worries about how your childhood will be ruined if you're sorted into Slytherin."
You win internet.
You need quotation marks at the end as well.
You were named after my brave professor who always me solved shit and the other who treated me like shit, but he liked my mom so I'm fine.
Albus Several Potter... it doesn't get any more cheesy.
Bravo!!
Just want to put this out there, pulling the trigger on a gun is like 100 times faster than yelling avada kedavra
Sergeant Johnson only if your boom boom stick is pointed at ur baddies ed
Sergeant Johnson You'd think hogwarts would mount machine guns on the roof or something when they became aware of the impending invasion....
Oh look! A swam of idiots charging us! Let's mow them down....
Sergeant Johnson Which is why the series was set in Britain and not the US ;)
Sergeant Johnson And now you're giving me flashbacks to that god-awful Harry Potter fanfiction "My Immortal" where they use guns instead of wands, everyone is a vampire-goth-satanist whose parents "committed suicide by slitting their wrists", and anyone who doesn't think that Gerard Way is the sexiest thing ever is a "prep" and worse than Hitler.
mattiesensei666 I refuse to believe this is a thing...I must deny its existence, for to accept it is to allow madness to consume my mind...
*"As you can see, we managed to sneak in ALL the Weasleys"* 😂😂
😂🤣🤣😂
except Charlie
Except the other 500 of them
@@ethanlamore2236 who knows, the Weasley family is more like the fucking Rabbit family
I wanted to like, but since the like count was at 666, i didnt want to ruin it
How Voldemort should have hidden horcruxes:
1 - Throw in ocean.
2 - Sneak into McDonalds kitchen. (It'll either end up in a random person's house or a garbage heap)
3 - Chuck through a person's window.
4 - Throw onto a boat.
5 - Hide in long grass.
6 - Under a bunch of rocks.
7 - In sewer.
BONUS - Turn a needle into a horcrux and drop in a haystack.
PlurpleDerp He really should have just gone into some random person's house and put it with their stuff. Bonus points if it's in another country.
Why not just turn a grain of sand into a horcrux and let it fly into space? Or at least the desert?
Extra points if it's on the other side of the world.
He was so vain he had to have his horcrux's be great trophies of his achievements
Extra points: attach horcrux to balloon, send ballon to space.
"brooms right when we need them" at first it did seem oddly convenient but then you remember it's the room of REQUIREMENT
In the book it is explained that the tiara was protected with spells, so you couldn't use the Accio spell. I guess it was also immune from the requirement room
Elisa Risconti the books do not matter. If you have a movie that is entirely dependent on the books to answer all the questions the movie isn't doing a good job at movie-ing
Cactus Cow you are right, I also think that cause otherwise it doesn't make sense to make a movie. I just gave the information.
I also don't like how Rowling explains things in the interviews or through questions by the fans. She was supposed to explain the rules/plot/characters clearly during the book.
Ooohhh.
Dukker Jammish He didn't require a platter. Lol
How to be a better Voldemort
1. Grab a pebble
2. Turn it into a horcrux
3. Drop it into a ocean
4. Enjoy immortality.
made my day
ayy
You need to kill a person for a Horcrux tho
Or do the same for a grain of sand in the middle of a desert.
Cupcakeworldcat AJ
Ok, kill a crab.
Then you can at least eat it
Imagine being harry and the knowing that your most hated teacher still had a crush on your mother
That should make hairy potter feel better. The hated teacher couldn't get what he wanted :(
He seems to be handling it well.
Filled Mug “hairy potter” 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
If snape didn’t just die it would’ve been way more awkward
@@unicornbarfingrainbows7599 *so harry your mum... Uh.... She was pretty hot*
"We managed to sneak in ALL THE WEASLEYS"
That made me laugh loudly.
can we just appreciate how the Order of Phoenix is now like 80% Weasley. Which is just outrageous!
Hermione Luna Morgenstern Herondale Prior which means it's also 80% ginger
TheAwfullGamer soo no souls for cruxe's i guess :P
Erebus2075 (Dramatically removes glasses.) My gawd... Brilliant!
Erebus2075 oh, true, i guess thats why.
"Skipping rocks across a pond waiting for Harry to show up."
Haha I can't get that image out of my head now.
Mike Cornell do you even know what kind of images I have in my head because of the books xD I read them in finnish, so translation might be little off, but harry is in 7th book like "are you saying that voldemort is hiding behind a dumpster and waiting that he could jump out and knock me out cold" or something xD oh dear.
He's wearing a hat and has his pants/robe rolled up to the knees
If it doesn’t skip he kills it and it’s family
No. You cannot sin McGonagall geeking out over finally using that spell. That moment is pure bliss and deserves a sin off.
Actually, it should be more sinned, but not for geeking out. Powerful spells require practice. There is no way McGonagall used it for the first time then and there.
@@Merlin7 she's an incredible witch especially when it comes to transfiguration/charms. I don't think she'd need practice, even for a spell that is that grand.
It's just to get a fan applause from the audience.
@@Merlin7 prof mcgonagall was a master of transfiguration( she was the teacher too) she was the one who brought the giant chess pieces to life in the sorcercer's/philosopher's stone too.
@@shihoinyoruich3780 I've read the books over a dozen times. I know them by heart. Every professor at Hogwarts would have been taught security procedures and basic spells when they were hired. They would have practiced them that year. It's ridiculous to think otherwise.
Something I noticed a few years ago: That scene where Professor McGonagall sends the Slytherins "to the dungeons" is actually not so dramatic when you remember that their common room is in the dungeons. So rather then it sounding like she is sending them to magic school-prison, actually this is the equivalent of sending them to their rooms lol
Good point!
BannØrn lol your right
But she IS holding them so they cant sabatoge the order of the phoenix. Read the books
wait thare common room is in the dungeons wow wy are sliderins trited purly
McGonagall sends them to the common room to be held in a safe place where they cant sabotage the order or get hurt in the battle
The fact you didnt sin the legendary Voldemort laugh is incredible
Eh heh heh!
AND HE SINNED FRED'S DEATH!!
@Kopi Bean *ding*
I agree! I had it as my text message sound for over a year
James Luqqy Lol I love that for you.
I would pay full ticket price to see Voldy skip rocks waiting for Harry.
Voldy is a OK nickname, But I also know that some people use the nickname Dumby for Dumbeldor. Not sure about this one...
Totally🤣🤣
Me too.
I wonder what the whole world other than Britain is doing rn instead of ,you know, helping kill the dark lord
Wouldn’t we all
“Man... if only I knew which Weasley this was... I might feel a bit bad about this.”
*Harry Potter fans scream in agony*
Considering how many tricks the twin actors played, including switching roles on set, I see Jeremy's point. In fact, the books make it seem like Harry can consistently and easily tell the twins apart, BEFORE George lost part of his ear. How?
George lost an ear, Fred died. Get over it!
@@dbseamz: Fred died
@@Alysa-Aiday HOW DARE YOU!! FRED NEVER DIED HES HERE !! HES RIGHT HERE WITH US
@@fleurdelacour1382 WHICH IS HOGWARTS HEAVEN WITH REMUS, SIRIUS, JAMES, LILY, SNAPE, DOBBY, HEDWIG, COLIN, MYRTLE and DUMBLEDORE
When I was in high school, I got into a fight with someone and everybody in campus gathered around to see it...
But when Harry and Voldemort were having their epic wand battle, there was not a single soul watching it....
I don't think they know how schools work..
It’s double dumb because everybody was watching in the book
Maybe because everyone's off fending for their lives...?
This was still in the middle of a wizarding war, if they looked away for 5 seconds the death eaters will avada kedavra their ass.
@@Liam-jy7yi Everybody was watching it it in the books. In the books every other one of the death eaters were captured or killed
Yes! The book had such a nice pay-off.
It was in the Great Hall, everybody was watching.
Before Harry killed Voldemort, he explained to him exactly why he had failed in his plan.
Then he killed him within a second. And there were all these people cheering, the first morning sunrays hit the scene... It was perfect.
I was so pissed with this movie. I'm sure it was not a bad movie at all, it was just really dissapointing to me in so many moments.
Also missing: Voldemort paralyzing Neville, placing the sorting hat on his head and putting it on fire.
Why would Bellatrix, Nagini or Voldemort crumble and fall apart when being killed?
Why would Voldemort ever use his hands to fight?
"Remus Rubeus Potter, you were named after two adults at Hogwarts who weren't complete assholes to me and used me as their pawn."
Crazy Jolteon Albus was a manipulative old man who kept a lot of secrets from Harry that could've helped him. Snape was an unapologetic abuser of his students simply because he couldn't get into Harry's mother's pants and then she died. Just because he went through some emotional trauma it shouldn't have affected his teaching duties.
wonderfulfun your an assshole
Agree as heck, like, why not name your son after people who actually cared about you, Harry?
I don't think he ever really wanted to teach, even tho he was good in that area. Slughorn's departure and him switching sides gave Dumbledore a reason to have him close. I think they planned for Harry's arrival early. And Snape's behavior had authenticity but also was staged (or exaggerated) because he would walk the finest of lines given Harry's connection to Voldemort.
Sirius was named in one of Harry sons James Sirius potter כּוֹחַ
There was once this time in high school when the Harry Potter hype was still a thing and I remember this kid was avoiding spoilers from the first movie as he wanted to see both parts in one. Then another guy went up to him and whispered, "Dobby dies", and he flipped out. We didn't see him for weeks. Figured that was worth sharing.
Haedox I hate when people spoil endings. I would have kicked his ass. XD
Hey guess what............................
DOBBY DIES
Haedox I had a friend who skipped to the end of the sixth book to find out what happens (he didn't really care about HP) then he drove by borders where there was still a line outside and screamed out his window that Dumbledore dies.
Haedox Nobody would care that much about the movie without having read the books first.
TrueTacticia Eh... he kinda was.
2:55 The reason they are being asked for Bellatrix's wand in the first place is because it is known to be stolen. Presenting Bellatrix's wand here, to goblins who've been briefed to look out for it, is tantamount to saying,
'Please arrest us immediately. And while we're talking, I'd like my room in Azkaban to have a sea view, regular bread and water, with hot and cold running Dementors, please.'
Overconfident sinning is overconfident.
Then why doesn't Hermoine as Bellatrix immediately reply "my wand was stolen". You might say they she didn't know it was stolen but if that's the case then why didn't she present it?
@Yawg moth don't bother, potter fanboys Are Petty as hell
The movie doesn't do a good job at explaining that though. What's more, even in-book it's not that solid, because if someone was going to impersonate Bellatrix, they'd likely try to do a good job of it, and the real Bellatrix wouldn't present her wand to a goblin, or anyone aside from Voldemort really.
@@yawgmoth6568, lord of the wastes, father of machines, the ineffable, all hail to you!!
Jamie Sleeman yeah they explained that better in the book and cinemasins has “the books don’t matter” rule
Harry: *gets married to ginny instead of Hermione*
Cinemasins:
*Writer disappoints everyone because she's afraid of cliche, cliche*
He was supposed to marry Hermione?
@@somex5500 It's complex. Don't ask...
@Thor Odinson everyone likes hermione, you suck
@@somex5500 no JK Rowling made it that she married Ron, but admits later that she wished that she didn't
@FireRat 16 everyone likes hermione, emma watson is great
You killed me with "we managed to sneak in ALL THE WEASLEYS"
RIP KhronicalTV, killed by a cinemasins video.
*Charlie doesn’t exist*
CinemaSins" Every horcrux was in and object, not a living thing"
Ummmmm, Nagini
Dumbledore didn't know it.
He says every horcrux harry killed
@@tianyuezhang6819 harry killed nagini?
Jan Urban No I meant in the video he said that every horcrux harry killed was an object. Harry didn’t kill nagini so that doesn’t count.
Annnnd harry
“Whatever spell lily put on Harry should have been put on the whole school by now”
I do not think you understand.
It *Was,* Idiot! The Book - Not so much the movie - has Harry himself explain to Voldemort that when he, Harry, sacrificed himself, Lily's protective magic protected everyone!!
Ramsay Sanders the books doesn’t matter, its cinemasins, not novelsins
I’m not surprised CinemaSins doesn’t understand....the movies do a terrible job of explaining that whole concept or why it matters in the Battle of Hogwarts. The movies leave out or skip over so much that they can be borderline incoherent if you’ve not already read the books. And that’s just crappy filmmaking
to anyone who don't get it, harry in the book let him avada himself to protect everyone from voldemort and his deatheaters, but I'm not sure how does it makes sense considering how it had affected harry
Exactly, Cinema Sins have never taken time to try to understand what some of these things means. Like about how he would never understand why snape put the sword in lestranges vault. Also he doesn’t understand the non verbal spells and the use of wands and how they are a way to transfer magic. It’s annoying when people have no clue what they talk about
3 minute mark: bellatrix’s wand was reported stolen, so if they gave it, the bank would know something is up
I’ve always wondered why, when they asked to see the wand, Hermione didn’t say something like “You KNOW my wand was stolen, now let me into my vault!”
@@Positivekitten I think they suspected that the goblins knew it had been stolen but weren't 100% certain.
Plus in theory she should have been locked in Malfoy Manor with all the others who let Harry escape.
they dit
Deleted scene also includes Voldemort picking his “nose” and trying to figure out what shampoo made him bald
Why is this so funny dammit?
giannis psillias thanks
WOAH I JUST REALISED 75 likes!!
Holy crud 84?
Omg, this is hilarious.
I never argue Sins, but doesn't Harry literally say to Ron seconds before/after (can't remember), "they know the wand was stolen". Doesn't that answer the "why Hermione won't show her wand" question?
Exactly! Somebody who understands
***** Actually, I think it was Gripphook that said it, but the point still stands.
They also explain that Voldemort's name has a spell on it so that anyone who uses it gets tracked and that you can't disapperate into or out of Gringot's just in previous movies.
***** Um, this sin pointing out isnt serious to begin with, so its not like it matters.
Chris Bir Actually, they only explain it in the deleted scenes. If you've not read the book, you have no way of understanding. (Why that was more expendable than the dancing scene, I'll never know.)
Ablus: But dad, what if I am but in Slytherin?
Harry: Well, if you are
I'm sure they'll make a stage play about it
Difficulty Controlled Someone saw HISHE's Lego Harry Potter video. (Lol)
You've seen the Lego HP in 90 seconds? I loved that! Harry: Well 8 films, and a stage play. What next?
Hermione: (Reading Fantastic beasts} I think they should make a film series based on this text book!
Difficulty Controlled iI
Difficulty Controlled HISHE!!!
Difficulty Controlled ii
Harry: "You're the gray lady"
Cinema Sins: "That's racist"
Me: "That's gracist"
🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wait it’s grey?? I thought always thought it was great lady
Will Stubbs yeah idk why I thought it was great lol
please
"how did you get that sword?" "a hologram deer showed me the way" "seems legit"
Fantastic Beck lol,for all I know it was Snape's patronus.
Jesus Deer
It's better than electing a king because some moistened tart distributed swords.
Another sin. Voldemort is pretty fond of the Avada Kedavra curse, yet somehow doesn't use it on Snape, for no purpose other than to make it possible for Harry to collect his tears.
Rasus The Fuckface There is a legitimate reason for that: the wand's owner cannot be killed by their own wand. So since Voldemort believes Snape owns the Elder Wand, he resorts to slitting his throat and letting Nagini finish him instead.
As for Harry, since he now believes he is the master, he uses AK, only to destroy the Horcrux part leaving Harry intact and in Limbo.
Jimbob1337 Huh... I guess that makes sense. Thanks, man.
Jimbob1337 Are you telling me he can't get another wand until he can claim ownership of that wand? Come on!
THEPELADOMASTER this is the Elder wand...it's different from other wands.
Nabiya Ri So? You can still kill someone with a regular wand
The "ewwww" sin for Ginny kissing Harry was priceless! Lmao
300 likes? THIS IS TH-cam!!!!!!!!!!
I agree. Kissing is gross!
“Oh look, brooms. Right when we need them”
Isn’t that the whole point of the room of requirement?
Eh not really. The room of requirement was supposed to be a room that its interior would suit the needs of the person about to enter. For example dumbledore once really needed to go to the bathroom and came across it, or in half blood prince harry and ginny really needed a room to hide the book. That room became the "lost and forgotten" room. Sure its very likely that some people dumped their old brooms there, but 3 convenient brooms conveniently placed next to them when they needed them the most? No thats just some plot device bullshit, otherwise the diadem should had been in front of harry as soon as he steps in, or like cinemasins has said multiple times why is there any conflict in the magic world when (and if) a room like that exists?
Well, that’s the room of hidden things which works differently than a just the room of requirement.
1:03 because godric gryffindor used it when he duelled muggles, because sword fights where a thing back in those days.
"Harry talks in his sleep..."
"F*ck you!"
Hahahaha.
DashCat9 I know, right? Such complete BS. Just because you've heard a few random words in an obscure language you probably have never tried to learn even a few words of, doesn't mean you can string together even one coherent sentence and expect anyone (even a magic gate) to understand it. And it was even in the books. Frustrating.
***** You only need to speak one word, what you say doesn't have to make sense. Theoretically if someone with no knowledge of the language would say at least one word if they whisper long enough.
Pokemonfox4
I thought that one needs to say "Open" to the entrance to make it open up. That is definitely what I remember from the books, and the Harry Potter Wikia also confirms that. I mean, the gate would be pretty dysfunctional if any random hissing noise had a good chance of triggering it to open. What Ron was trying to do was essentially like knowing the letters that the language uses and trying to build random words out of them. The "monkeys banging on typewriters" analogy springs to mind.
DashCat9 weard shit
DashCat9
Fucking hilarious!
Sinning Cinema Sins for sinning thew idea that a Horcrux can't be made out of a living thing after we have established that the snake, a living thing, is a Horcrux.
MaxTheMaximumGamer Exactly! Is everyone gonna just gloss over that?
they didnt say it CAN'T be made out of a living thing, they are saying it shouldn't have HAD to latch on to a living thing when his spell went off, as Dumbledore CLEARLY implied. Meaning it could have easily latched onto anything from Harry's room. A book, a piece of paper etc...
Even then you could prolly ignore that by saying something like "oh well he used a spell on a living person, thus the spell rebounding would obviously attach to a living thing if possible."
Thew is not a word...
Also, how stupid is sin no. 102?
*ding*
There should of been a:
*you know who* bonus round
** should’ve
sorry I had to
avada kedavra bonus round
"Listen to me, Albus Severous Potter." Movie writes its own fanfiction.
Elijah Talmud yes thank you! I'm all for naming a child after someone you loved (for example when I have a daughter I am naming her Nora after my grandmother whom I loved) but there are some names you just don't do and that is one of them. His second kid James was a little better since James is a better name than Albus
Severous? Really? You didn't read the books did you?..
Hasn't CinemaSins taught you anything? The books don't matter. : ' )
Elijah Talmud They mean you spelled it wrong. It's Severus (it's latin), and the name was also in the books, so the movie isn't writing fan fiction in this particular case.
Now you can hate the name, some book readers do too.
Oh no, I knew that they were getting at. It was a typo I didn't care to correct. And it appears you misunderstood what I was getting at. That name is absolutely cringeworthy and sounds like something a teenage girl scribbled on her tumblr.
the way voldermorty said avada kadavra was fucking hilarious
UURRVAAAAAHDUUUUH KUDAAAAAAVUUUUUUH
SonicCam04 😂😂
he was digging deep to kill that man lolol
It sounds like I WANT A BANANA!!
If I were Harry, at the end of the battle, before cracking the wand I would used it to repair the entire Howarts, or at least the bridge or Hagrid's hut
Yeh didn't look like a hard spell for Dumbledore lol. Sure Harry could of done that aswell..
In the books he used it to repair his old wand. So selfish.
it bothered me too 👺
i cant remember where but i read that hogwarts could fix itself.
Hagrids hut could be fixed by any teacher , prolly fixed by mcgonagall.
Juan Peñas in the book he used it to repair his own wand
I'd like to say something.
*Voldemort allows this.*
He's still with us...in here.
*VOLDEMORT CONTINUES TO ALLOW THIS.*
He's riding a high right now. He's pretty much won at this point since his nemesis for 17 years is dead. He's pretty much gloating by letting Neville say his bit.
"My God, Voldemort just used a lot of his power and cracked his wand destroying our deadly force-field!"
"Can't we just put it back up again?"
"Nah, that's too easy"
James Gibblesghotten By the time the barrier was restablished, all Voldemort's people would have gotten in
MZG20 Well it took them long enough to arrive in the movie. At least a good 3/4 of the army would have been cut off considering it only took them about 20 secs to put it up
That's true
James Gibblesghotten Yes :). In some old strategy computer games, there was a simple defense trick: just dedicate some of your workers to constantly building walls and towers behind more walls and towers. They should have at least tried to use some wizards to just make force field bubbles inside force field bubbles, until V-t got magic arm/tongue muscle cramps destroying them.
Or to hard to put up again.
"brooms! right when we need them!"
because it's the effin room of requirement!
xx April M aaaand, the Room Of Requirements is an ex machina closet!
xx April M wait, didn't whats her face blow the room of requirement door into a million pieces a few movies ago?..
Didnt the room only open if you need it not spawn brooms
From the books: The room only opens if you need it AND it contains exactly what you need inside it, except for edible stuff. But this is cinemasins, not booksins, so: "The books don't matter"
The... BROOM of requirement... I'll show myself out...
Wand + Incantation = Easy
Wand = Medium
Incantation = Hard
Nothing = Pro
nothing could also be an emotional person (probably teenager), as magic can also derive from emotion. Remember back in book/movie 1 when harry made the glass disapepar? no wand. no incantation. Just emotion. He wasn't a pro. just emotional.
+Hunter Haycraft and book three when her turned Aunt Marge into a balloon.
+Hunter Haycraft
Good point.
+Hunter Haycraft disappear
I explained it in a comment more fully in an earlier video, but this is actually a delightfully simple explanation.
You get a sin for not sinning the moment where Lord Voldemort says " Harry Potter is dead."
*Creepy awkward laugh
*Ehehehh*
@@icebear6598 heeeeeeeeeeehhhheeee-eeeehhhhhhhhhh
That's not a sin at all. That shows how weird, creepy and different Voldemort is. Like the 'hug' he gives Draco.
"Voldemort at the improv"
Sin 52: Here's how I like to label thd Hogwarts houses...
Gryffendor: The Special Snowflakes
Ravenclaw: At Least We're Not Hufflepuff
Hufflepuff: Cannon Fodder
Slytherin: You Are Eleven Years Old and We've Already Decided You're Evil
Cupcake Wolf
guess I’m evil
I'm Ravenclaw and i feel bad for hufflepuffs here
I’m Gryffindor and I’m offended 😂
@gold ingot Nah Hufflepuff has Newt Scamander now. I wish us Ravenclaws could get a knockoff of the series with a Ravenclaw main character
Looks like someone spends too much time on tumblr..
But is Hermione finally old enough to be hot in that '19 years later' ending?
Bleeters Seeing how she was born on April 19, 1990. She's been legally 'hot' since April 19, 2008. Which in the line of Harry Potter movies puts it around the recording of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.
Bleeters ima gonna say yes because my body feels like my boner is jstified
DriftKingNL "Legally hot"? Is that another horrible Legally Blonde sequel?
Bleeters They (frickin' finally) declared her hot in the last video and also they sinned the fact that she didn't go topless in this one.
Bleeters You poor bastards, I was six when the first movie came out so she was always old enough to be hot. Well starting from movie 3 she was.
Well when "Regression" comes out, we will get to see her topless.
Some of these are explained in the books but in the movies they're just like "ehhhh whatever"
Movies are time limited. And are amazing for what they had to work with. Deal with it
Vitalik Dakhnovets fuck these books and movies
We have a motto in cinema sins "the books don't matter"
movies are different sometimes and it's called CINEMA sins
if the movies represent the books they should have hit all the key plot points and there would have been no plot holes but the wand points will always have plot holes
2:33 If you payed attention, in part 1 before they showed the engraved “mudblood” on poor Hermione, you can see her tracking Bella’s hair as it falls on her upper arm.
Paid.
Harry Potter movies in a nutshell:
Sorcerers Stone - cute 11 year olds in wizard school
Chamber of secrets - scary pipe in the bathroom leads to certain death but 12 year olds are able to get in somehow (hogwarts how many lawsuits do you have)
Prisoner of askaban - time travel and just kinda wack but we here for it
Goblet of fire - stop fighting with ron harry
Order of the Phoenix - Harry’s one chance of having a god father must die of course
Half blood prince - let’s finally get to the climax of this story and kill another one of the beloved characters
DH part 1 - harry x Hermione
DH part 2 - world is obviously going to be saved since this is the last movie, time to bring out the innocence of all the-so called evil characters
LMFAO
how right you are
@Jon Hesson To a certain part of the worlds population, but not all
9:08 they are literally in the room of requirement
Then why not a portkey to a safe place?
I think that would be Jeremy's counter to that argument
@@alwaysseverus741 I don't remember any such rules about having to know how to make the stuff inside it.
Hogwarts probably wouldn't allow a portkey off the premises, but I see no reason it wouldn't allow one to the outside of the room of requirement
@@SomeNiceMovies, unfortunately, they'd need permission from the MoM to create a portkey and then it would take a while to actually create said portkey. However, considering the emergency and the state of the MoM, an exception could be made for the permission issue. There's really no working around how long it takes to create one. Hmmm. It's a bit of a puzzle there.
2:32 in the previous movie, just after Bellatrix finishes torturing Hermione and she's like crying, you can see a hair fall onto her, and she watches it.
10:30 I'm pretty sure he used the wand just to slit his throat.
Discord Pone
yep. i missed Sirius Black's death but i managed not to miss that littel Bellatrix hair. xD
I won't lie, the comment about Lily's eyes in the flashback made me laugh pretty hard. "were they talking bout shape? prescription?" im dead haha
JK Rawling has said many times that scene involvingv Hagrid carrying "dead" Harry into Hogwarts, was the first scene she envisioned when she started writing Harry Potter books. Since it was Hagrid who brought Harry into wizard world, it was very logical that he also brings him back into it.
She has also said many times that the only character she knew would survive the end for sure was Hagrid for exactly that purpose.
They probably didn't consider him threat or anything. And, lets be honest, he wasn't.
Miroslav Tomic and that's why most writers don't go with the first idea that pops Into their heads.
Miroslav Tomic It has been stated in the books that Hagrid had a resistance to magic because of his giant blood. They probably tried killing him, but it failed.
Actually, JK Rawling never said anything. Though, i know a JK Rowling who did.
Miroslav Tomic
What I've always wondered is do Bullets work on Wizards. I mean that scene in the woods what if you had a bunch of snipers just shoot at Voldemort and their minions, would they dodge it? would they instantly be protected? are they bullet proof? something that I've always wondered about
JaxBlade In the books, its kinda assumed that wizards could just block the bullets, but I think in real life, bullets could work if they didn't suspect them. But, it would probably be easy to cure bullet wounds...
The Zecromancer I don't think you could do any kind of spell before a bullet would reach them at close range, like in the last fight scene Voldemort could have pulled a gun on harry and harry couldn't do shit to stop it, boom end of movie Voldemort wins.
The Zecromancer I don't think you could do any kind of spell before a bullet would reach them at close range, like in the last fight scene Voldemort could have pulled a gun on harry and harry couldn't do shit to stop it, boom end of movie Voldemort wins.
The Zecromancer i vaguely remember a character (probably Mr. Weasley) mention the muggles having 'silver wands' that they point at people then die, so given their knowledge of rubber ducks, I'd doubt the most they'd know is 'that thing is bad'
Although, given the intelligence of the villains in this series, they'd probably think a muggle couldn't hurt them and then get shot whilst laughing or something
The Zecromancer But a sniper could like Aim at the head and BLAT could they heal that if their brains cover the forest?
For everyone arguing about books
The books don't matter because the movie does a poor job of translating or explaining things compared to the book so the movie deserves to be sinned, he's not sinning the books
The people who made the movies should just actually read the books instead of having them vaguely described while on crack, because i could have made these movies 100000 times better than this disrespecful pile of shit of a series. And yeah i did read the books hundreds of times as a kid
Um no you couldn’t...the movie received a 96% from critics most of which didn’t read the books. If you think you could make a better movie than one of the highest rated movies in history without any experience, you must not have very many brain cells
Thank you, you're a good person.
Even the books aren't immune. Rowling should not have included devices like Time Turner or the Liquid Luck. Those raises more questions than resolves conflict.
@@jamesluqqy3697 Not really, the only person who didn't really read the book was the guy who did GOF.
Movie Sin tally: 163
Sentence:
*_UAAAAAAAHHHHHUAUAVAVVVAAADDAA KEEDAAUUHHHVVRRRUUAAAHA_*
I am currently watching through all of CS's videos
This is the best Sentence ending (that does not include bonus rounds). Best "sentence", anyway. By far
SomeNiceMovies LMFAO Ikr
Can just say how fucking PISSED I am at how they cut down the battle between Molly and Bellatrix? Like, I get time constraints and all. But in the books, these two witches fought so fiercely that the ground cracked! It was huge and epic and dramatic and it showcased not only Bellatrix as Voldemort's best fighter (which she was), but Molly as the absolute, badass powerhouse that I had been waiting to see for all seven books! And they cut it down to THIS little, thirty-second bit. Not to mention all of the other awesome bits from the Battle of Hogwarts that they left out... Don't get me wrong, Harry Potter is my jam, but they could have done so much better.
When did it mentioned it cracking the ground
I KNOW!! The only magic battle I liked watching in the movies was the one between Voldemort and dumbledore in order of the Phoenix
they really did fuck up the battle of hogwarts.. it was sooooo epic in the book... they also dumbed down half blood prince immensely
they did!!! half blood prince is my favourite book but least favourite movie
Let's be honest. If you love HP books you kinda hate each and every movie. It is just impossible not to, with all the cuts, changes of characters etc.
This series of videos should be called "why you should read the books."
Don't blame me that you can't read.
+SupernerdScrawl You're completely missing the point of these videos if you think the books matter.
***** #dyslexic
It is a poorly written movie. That was the point of my comment. A movie version of a book is always horrible by comparison. The source matters. The source always matters. So yes the books matter. If you can say they don't obviously you're just a troll, and I shouldn't be wasting my time talking to you.
***** someone cant understand what "CinemaSins" means.
Spoler alert !!
Special deleted scene include :
Voldemort grew tired waiting harry to show up, ordered super mega size meal for him & nagini, after harry suddenly show up, he stuffed a mouthful bite of burger & fries, before casting the spell
Voldemort : "OOOVOOODAA KOOODAAAVROO !!"
XD ahahahhhaha this made my day🤣🤣🤣🤣
Good ones
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
🤣🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Lol yeah why didn’t he turn a napkin in to a horcrux and throw it away. It couldn’t be destroyed so it would just be an indestructible napkin that Harry would never know about.
*it just makes burgers and fries appear*
Voldemort: *frick*
RIP John Hurt, a brilliant actor, loved him in the wand shop scene in the first film.
You forgot the Cho Chang, who is a year older than Harry, is standing with the students, with her f`ing uniform on. I don`t know about you, but I`m pretty sure there is no such thing as an 8th year😣😣😣😣😣😣😣😈
True
Maybe she got held back a year?
Or she came back after graduating and for some reason decided to wear her old uniform?
I'm just making stuff up here.
Jeff Li She comes back in the second wave of people that arrive to fight.
Jeff Li Also, shes supposed to be Chinese but Cho and Chang are both Korean surnames
GBM Crew Chang is also a Chinese surname.
2:30 In part one, it literally shows a scene of a hair falling on to Hermione.
CinemaSins Sin Counter: 1
*Ding*
this is part 2 though and there was a whole year in between films. TBF he'd still just sin it if we got a flashback though.
Nolanator7 how are we supposed to remember one strand of hair falling to hermione? The movie differences is one year. You’re dumb asf
@@kristen1684 Id argue since it is from Part 2, it is not unreasonable.
Nicholas Truman nope the scene where they’re in malfoy’s manor and bellatrix tortures hermione is in the 7th movie and the 8th movie starts with them brewing the potion. So I do think it’s u reasonable to remember one strand of fucking hair fall to hermione we were too busy being hurt by her screams NO I WONT SHUT UP
@@kristen1684 The hair fell on her while Bellatrix was busy scolding the other Death Eaters. This was the perfect opportunity for Hermione to tuck the hair in a pocket or something, and she exploited said opportunity.
I find it hard to believe that NO ONE in Slytherin wanted to help Harry. And they all just followed Filch to the dungeons without protest.
Some of them brought help in the books according to Rowling
+Skyebright1 Nope. According to the chapter 30 of the last book no student in Slytherin helped Harry fight the Voldemort and his minions. There were few from Ravenclaw, a dozen or so from Hufflepuff and a half from Griffindor.
+Arko777777 I suppose the Slytherins would refuse to fight because that may have been family members and friends in the Death eater crowd
Caitlyn Baron
I agree. That's the good reason why they all went to the dungeons.
Arko777777 If I was in that position and I knew my family and friends were fighting, I would rather go down to the dungeons and do nothing than risk getting them in more trouble
4:26 that is because if you say his name they know where you are
yep, was looking for someone pointing this out. you are right.
Its a taboo
Movie should've mentioned it.
@@jasondyrkacz8270 Movie did mention it
@sudha bhatt part one
4:48 a very subtle way of saying I wish Hermione was half naked in this scene 😂
They should have done what they did when Leeloo got changed in The Fifth Element.
😏😏😏
Agreed
Who, I'm asking WHO didn't thought about this. XD
@@onyxdemeraude2412 lul
I hated how Professor Mcgonagall sent all the Slytherins into the dungeon just because Pansy told someone to get Harry. What if some Slytherins wanted to fight against Voldemort but they weren't given the chance to prove that not all Slytherins are bad?
This
My girlfriend actually made a good point about putting the Slytherins in the dungeon (not that the filmmakers were thinking this, but still): regardless of how you feel about Slytherin, it's an objective fact that a *lot* of them have Death Eater parents. That doesn't mean that the kids are evil, but do you really want to force them to choose between trying to kill their dad or being labeled a coward for not fighting?
yeah
Considering several Slytherin children had relatives and parents and friends fighting alongside Voldemort, it was mostly to protect the children themselves.
Not to be that person that's like "WELL IN THE BOOK", but once people realize that Voldemort is coming to Hogwarts all the students are woken up and gather at their house tables in the Great Hall. Professor McGonagall makes an announcement about evacuations and about staying, if you're of age, to fight against the Death Eaters and Voldemort. So most of the students evacuate but there are still groups that stay behind from gryffindor, hufflepuff, and ravenclaw because they're old enough. BUT. THE ENTIRE SLYTHERIN TABLE IS ABANDONED. So I totally get how you're saying that she should have given some Slytherins the chance to prove that not all of them are bad, but all of them were bad or taught that they were bad because THEY ALL LEFT to go join the death eaters or their parents to be on the bad side lol.
I thought that saying Voldemort's name can make them be detected. That's why they're You-Know-Whoing. Am i wrong?
You are correct - the Ministry put a Taboo on the name, so whenever it was said, all protective enchantments are broken and whoever said the name can be taken in. However, this was never explained in the movies.
Phoebe Arellano Exactly. They dish out sins using exposition only available in the movie, not in the book.
^The Ministry didn't make Voldemort's name taboo, Voldemort did it himself.
ATBPjako no your right in the books at least but they never mention it in the movies so cinema sins take fair game outa that
I didn't know that it's not mentioned lol. Okay then thanks for the nice answers people!
Also, when Ron said "if we did for them Harry, I'm going to kill you!" Let's just take you back to the first movie when Ron said "sort out her priorities!"
Did they not explain in the movies that Voldemort put a taboo on his name so that's why they were calling him You Know Who?
GoldenStealthyRock Nope. They just start calling him You Know Who for no reason after they get found in the coffee shop.
They did explain, it was just very briefly during that radio scene. The movie expects you to have read the book.
I don't know, I watched it the other day, and I never heard them say that they can't say Voldemort. They just swapped back to calling him You Know Who. And a movie based on a book that's split into two parts (especially since the 7th book isn't that large) really shouldn't leave out details expecting you to have read the book. If any of the movies should've been split into two parts, it was the 5th. That book was fucking enormous.
Not really
Yes. In the extended version of DHP1 Ron tells Hermione and Harry in the tent that Voldemort's name is taboo.
Godric Gryffindor like dueling and he also thought it was unfair to use a wand against a muggle. That is why he had a sword.
"he also thought it was unfair to use a wand against a muggle" so he creates a magic sword ... still unfair to me.
The sword isn't magic, okay it is enchanted to be able to appear out of nowhere, but it is not stronger or better than any other muggle-sword. "The question of why a wizard would need a sword, though often asked, is easily answered. In the days before the International Statute of Secrecy, when wizards mingled freely with Muggles, they would use swords to defend themselves just as often as wands. Indeed, it was considered unsporting to use a wand against a Muggle sword (which is not to say it was never done). Many gifted wizards were also accomplished duellists in the conventional sense, Gryffindor among them."
The sword absord all the upgrades, that's the reason the sword can destroy an horcrux. This is an overpower sword final point. J.K Rolling like Tolkien doesn't know how to write without Deus Ex Machina.
Geesh, you don't need to be so upset about it.
Naomi Bousson Lol ikr
You know what HP movie needed a two parter? Goblet of Fire. Damn book was huge, with lots of junk.
Think about it, we could have had part 1 end with Harry's name popping out of the goblet. And then we could have had some actual scenes of the World Cup in part 1 making the whole thing much better.
Darkgun231 Well theaters wouldnt bother doing a two part fourth-movie thing. People would have lost all interest
@@hithere4289 If we can have three parters out of a single book a quarter the size of GoF, surely people would watch HP regardless of one of the middle books in the series being a two parter?
@@Darkgun231 Pretty sure Harry Potter book fans would rush to watch a 100 part any-book film but remember film directors mainly aim mainstream masses to watch it so I don't think they would invest that much money only on hardcore fans :p
@@hithere4289 Wasn't the HP fanbase the mainstream audience? It was the most popular book series the world over for a long time. Plus, tell me you can't see greedy directors splitting single books into multiple movies for more ticket sales. Most people would still watch 'em, honestly, because the masses tend to be... gullible I think is the kindest way to refer to them.
How about Order of the Phoenix? That was the longest book in the series if I recall
The “it” he was pennywise obviously
I remember reading a post on Tumblr (I know, I know) that this girl had skipped to the last page of the book because she couldn't wait to see what happened, and it says something about Ginny giving Albus a kiss goodbye, and of course at this point she didn't know Ginny and Harry named their son Albus, and thought that Ginny was having a relationship with back from the dead Dumbledore and was so fucking confused.
why isn't this top comment
Why are you saying "I know, I know"? Tumblr is great
dumpling dump parts of Tumblr are great, like the Harry Potter fandom, but other parts are really toxic, and there is a pretty bad reputation of Tumblr as a whole.
+Allie Berry I guess so
Excuse me, what the fuck?
Fun fact there is a trace on the word “Voldemort” In the deathly Hallows. That is how the two death eaters found them in that small shop after the wedding. And also how the snatchers found them in the forest when they took them to the manor. So that is why harry is using you know who because then they couldn’t be tracked
Fun Fact: Everyone knows this. The sin is the movie not explaining the Taboo.
And the fact they inexplicably stop using Voldemort's name despite them happily using it throughout all the other films. In fairness it's a sin in the books too because they go several weeks never saying Voldemort's name because Ron gets all huffy whenever they begin to say it, then they conveniently do say it when a little action is needed.
@@semanticsamuel936 No it's not. Even if the name had the trace on it during the previous books, Voldemort was not in power so he couldn't just break down the door and kill them now could he?
@@haashgaminglol7848 Not during previous books/films, but in Deathly Hallows itself. Remember that they're happily saying his name, then get caught out by Death Eaters at the café, then inexplicably stop using his name well before they know about the Taboo. In the books, Ron becomes paranoid about them using it...for some reason, and makes them shut up whenever they're about to say it (until they don't, and get caught out again).
Oh that explanation makes sense. I never read the books nor have any desire to but the use/non-use of his name though was very inconsistent in the films I thought
*movie has one picosecond of logos*
Cinema sins: *angerey*
And two shitty parts with crap story.
He has to sin logos its a tradition and an obligation
Godric Gryffindor used the sword against muggles that he duelled so that he wouldn’t have an unfair advantage
The worst sin in this movie is not including the plot line of the book in which Harry fixes his broken wand with the elder wand before breaking it...
Before breaking it? He never breaks the wand in the book!
He keeps it back in Dumbledore's grave so that when Harry would die, the Elder Wand wouldn't have an owner, hence it's power would be insignificant
+Reeta Singh no????? He broke it.
Ethan Joe and Chris Ayers we are talking abaut the movie, how they not including the plot line of the book in which Harry fixes his broken wand whit the wand of dumbledore.
+AuraMaster Maybe it was done off screen? I would have love to have seen that too, but I doubt Harry would want another wand other than his own
+AuraMaster he already has a wand so who cares
Do you want to know the biggest problem with Harry Potter and the deathly hallows part 2...
They are too dark for you to even see half of what's happening 😂
Yes!!
IKR
That reminds me of GoT s08e03
then you either need your eyes tested or to adjust the settings on your tv... looks perfectly fine to me whenever I watch it, I never have trouble making anything out.
@@SA80TAGE Well, man, it's not up to you to change the luminosity... It's up to the directors...
Hermione didn't show Bellatrix wand because the goblins knew she had her wand stolen
Rhys Jones Thanks Captain Obvious!
That might be true but I think the reason she didn't present the wand because Bellatrix would never do something like that. The bitch was really pompous.
these videos arent serious
That's not why Hermione didn't show the wand. Otherwise she wouldn't have brought Bellatrix's wand with her to the bank, which she did. But yes, you are correct that that's the LOGICAL reason for her not to do it, but alas these movies are not logical at all.
Although she DID show the wand in the books...
4:09 the dragon is blind and doesn't know where he is going
Blindness makes it incapable of feeling people riding it? Or maybe you mean the previous sequence where the dragonfire should have superheated the whole area and cooked everyone regardless if the dragon was aiming at them?
That so sad tbo
@@scottmatheson3346 does a cat notice every flea on it's body every time it moves?
Since I had to leave about 50 comments for the previous HP video, here is a list of all of my comments:
-Dumbledore said that there was no spell or enchantment to bring people (or anything, for that matter) back to life.
-The sword is impregnated with Basilisk venom, making it a powerful weapon. Need I explain further?
-You can still USE wands from others, but the magic won't be as powerful.
-The dragon is blind and couldn't feel them.
-They said You-Know-Who because the word 'Voldemort' was cursed so that Death Eaters would find you when you say it.
-SLYTHERIN IS NOT FUCKING EVIL. IT'S THE HOUSE OF AMBITION AND CUNNING. NOT EVIL.
-Ron copied what Harry said for the locket to open.
-The Elder Wand worked like a normal wand. If he unlocked its full power, then it would be THE most powerful wand in history.
-In the book, both Harry and Lily's eyes were green and almond-shaped. Fuck movies for changing appearances, eh?
-YOU SAYIN' DAT NAGINI AIN'T LIVIN'? * ahem * Are you saying that Nagini wasn't living? SNAKES ARE LIVING, SENTIENT BEINGS THANK YOU VERY MUCH. Horcruxes usually aren't assigned to living things because they're very hard to... Well, you know.
-It's 'the power of love' or some sloppy cliche thing like that which saved Harry. Not a fucking spell.
I saved you from having to scroll through 394 comments. You're welcome.
Emerald Daffodils im sure some of those are only explained in the books so moot point
Sky Dayer Even if some of them were only in the books, people should still read the books first. Movies are an addon to the book; not a standalone copy.
"The books don't matter" - Cinema Sins.
Emerald Daffodils Nope Slytherin produces all the bad guys so Slytherin=Evil
GrimSleeper Peter Pettigrew. PETER. FUCKING. PETTIGREW. Oh, so it's not evil to be a Death Eater and betray your best friends by fucking causing their deaths? And Snape was not evil. And Merlin was the greatest wizard of all time. And Salazar Slytherin wasn't evil either. Draco is not evil. Plenty of Slytherins aren't evil, and plenty of non-Slytherins are evil.
You missed the awesome part where Snape not only blocks Mcgonagall's attack but in the same movement takes out the two dark wizards behind him whilst continuing the fight as if it wasn't him. Surely that's -1 sin?
Look closely. Snape reflects the shots in their direction on purpose and looking even closer you can see that he takes their wands with him. He killed them, not Minerva.
You pretty much just repeated what he said
Snape blocked the spell so it hit the wizard and witch behind him instead of him
it was to protect the students . he is a good guy
+Funjumper i never saw that he took the wands
Harry: "why didn't you tell her"
Cinemasins: "who's her?"
Harry: "bellatrix" five seconds after saying it, soooo
CinemaSins is impatient and hates *"The Pronoun Game"* +40 Sins!
*Sentence:* Locked in baby body! (Voldemort prior to the ritual in Goblet of Fire)
Thats why you don't use a movie where a shit ton of people know all the lines
Lmao ikr
Probably not cannon but my belief is that Voldemort needed to know where the Hocruxes were to use them again, so they can't just be randomly buried or in the middle of the sea or something. Also I think it would need to be somewhere secret as people would 'feel' the evil prescience. And lastly, it needs to be a powerful object to maintain the soul part. The diary, harry, and nagini are the only ones that aren't really and I that can probably be explained away with emotional magic(put his feelings in the diary, love/hate in making harry, something something snakes for nagini)
Fun Fact: Harry's eyes were originally supposed to be green, but Daniel had a minor allergic reaction to the contacts, so he couldn't wear them.
+EmeraldBomb
They were supposed to be green
Even if he had worn the contacts, it wouldn't have mattered because they still made Lily's eyes brown lol
Amy Stroud True, but they also tried to have Lily wear blue contacts and they didn't show up on camera.
Snoopy They couldn't have just digitally altered them?
I mean, all that SFX budget money, and they chose NOT to input Harry Potter's most important feature.
Snoopy
This isn’t a fun fact if you read a single sentence of the books.
Something that bothers me here and it is when he sins Hermione for getting the Bellatrix hair. There is a specific scene in part one that shows the hair float to her and it's not even that subtle. The scene is basically saying, "HEY, THIS IS IMPORTANT AND YOU SHOULD PROBABLY REMEMBER THIS FOR LATER." Don't get me wrong, I love CinemaSins, but this is just plain lazy.
I agree, but I must add that I've seen this movie 1000 times and it wasn't until the 1001 time viewing this movie that I actually saw the hair scene, they probably just overlooked it, they are human, but that is a sin lol
DarylAndrea Yeah, I agree with you. They are human, but since their channel is all about nit picking I thought I would call them out on it since the movies did account for it :P
Z3NZ IKR. I feel like CinemaSins don't even watch the movies first
Z3NZ "Why is this a sin? Because f*ck you, that's why!" ~CinemaSins
Z3NZ CinemaSins in general is lazy
Dude. Horcrux a grain of sand. Drop it in the ocean. You are now immortal.
Genesectasaurus The problem is that once you die, you'd need someone to find that grain of sand and perform that stupid resurrection spell.
Telogor _ wait what? there's a resurrection spell? explain that
I think he means the stone
Will Tenenbaum i think he doesn't understand the whole thing completely since he is talking about the fourth movie where Voldemort is brought back to full form using Harry's blood, Peters hand and one of his fathers bones. they wouldn't need to find the sand piece, just whatever living thing your soul is now clinging to for life (like what happened to the first defense against the dark arts teacher in the first movie)
Telogor _ The thing is, you can't die in the first place
“Man.. if Only I knew which Weasley this was...I might feel bad about this” with the amount of tricks Oliver and James did on set, I’m not surprised. It took me a good few months to figure out who was who, sometimes I *still* can’t figure out which is which. But just a heads up that is Fred
Ohhhh book not Fred, but he did so much and was clearly important.
He co owned that shop and was around. He was clearly the most important.
the reason they didn't use the mind controlling spell was because it was Imperio, one of the forbidden curses. If they used it in the previous movies they would get severely punished for it but now the ministry is being controlled by voldemort and harry can finally use spells without being found out his whereabouts
fredener1 ak spell? do you mean Avada Kedevra spell? if so, he would just be like voldemort
TheCrazyBrittish Eeyupp. I still think it should be a 47 behind Avada Kedevra. How awesome would it be to shorten the ultimate death spell with "AK 47" ?
fredener1 He did use Crucio on Bellatrix in Order of the Phoenix
***** he done fucked up.
***** he fucked up. he screwed up. he didn't do it right.
Albus. Severus. Potter
Oh my God!
Was it wrong I went into a laughing fit?
Hermione Luna Morgenstern Herondale Prior I did too
Nope not at all! I was dying!! XD
that poor boy. I hope he ends up in Hufflepuff or Ravenclaw. I HOPE THEY ALL DO!! I’m sick and tired of Gryffindor and Slytherin
They named their pets Hedwig and Pigwidgeon. I don't know why I anticipated their kids having normal names.
Harry Potter named his kids like a nerd who just finished the Harry Potter series would have
Harry Potter is the number Potterhead
Don't forget.. Goyle died instead of Crabbe in the movie... They should have done that with Fred and Percy too....
+Dóbby Zabina Only because Crabbe wasn't even in the film. The actor got done for drugs or something, hence why he doesn't appear in the last 3 or so films
+elijah ”Bulbamew” handley He was selling marijana and used it. I already know that. Since it happened.. But the thing is, why change the death of someone else, when J.K Rowling has been confiming that Goyle has kids 19 years in the future... They changed Dumbledore after second movie, since the first actor died. They could have done the same with Crabbe. It just mess up everything.
Dóbby Zabina Probably just because Crabbe and Goyle weren't major characters. Rowling was part of the writing of the final films, she would have changed it if she disagreed so she obviously wasn't too bothered about Goyle dying instead
+elijah “Bulbamew” handley Agreed. and technically, Crabbe isn't there to begin with. lol.
+Dóbby Zabina Agreed. They also killed off Lavender Brown despite her surviving Greyback's attack in the books. I say Percy should have died.
You didn’t sin when Snape was hugging Lily’s corpse when there was a literally ALIVE and crying baby boy behind him.
@Kevin Sundelin Nope, Snape just left Harry there. Sirius showed up and was the one who took Harry outside. He lent Hagrid his bike and gave him Harry, then went to hunt down Pettigrew.
(I didn't read the book). I would argue that it was a matter of priorities. Snape cared about Lily. As far as he's concerned, Harry (or everything else) was not important. Some people just don't care to get involved. Just 2 months ago, there was a security footage of 2 old women (60ish) being attacked with a cinder block at their own liquor store. And you can see a customer sneaking away while the women were being attacked. That was not the first time something like that happens. And it won't be the last. Some people just don't care enough to get involved. Now that I think about it. It's also possible that Snape didn't want people to know he helps. He was a part of Voldermort's posse. He can't let it get out that he helped Harry. th-cam.com/video/5NiGW3-xBwI/w-d-xo.html
@@elsonlam okay but that's grown women who could maybe take care of themselves until help got there or was called or something. Even people who claim to not like other people would say you're on your own to them would usually not leave a little baby by themselves to possibly die like that. And we know Snape is somehow good at least a little bit and cared about Lily. So it really is bullshit that he just ignored the crying baby. completely. I
@@mariahdibben4066 But you're talking about complete strangers. If Voldermort finds out Snape helps, it wouldn't end well for him. Another thing to consider is that Snape loved Lily. Her lifeless body could have devastating effect on him that he momentary makes bad decisions. For him, at that time, nothing means anything.
I would sin the fact that Avada Kedavra is a forbidden spell and everything but we see Molly killing Bellatrix with other spells so why is this different? It's just murder with extra steps
Felipe E. Bellatrix is wanted. She escaped Azkaban. So Molly did them a favor.
The killing curse kills everything about you. Had a moving painting of yourself? Not anymore. Want to travel as a ghost? Haha, you can thank the killing curse that you can't.
Th killing curse is used ONLY to kill, which is why it is an unforgivable curse. Other spells can possibly kill you, but their purpose isn't only to kill.
Felipe E. Thing is, something like, say, Diffindo, can be used without killing someone - or even for ordinary purposes. Stupefy can be used to kill too, e.g. knocking someone off their broom midair - but that’s no cause to ban stupefy. On the other hand, the three unforgivable curses are solely for - well - _unforgivable_ purposes: to kill, torture and control the will of others.
Curryman91 Thats bullshit snape kills Dumbledore with the avada kedavra and Dumbledore still has a moving picture of him in the principals room. Dont know about ghosts tho
"Who's her?!" Well, he literally says Bellatrix RIGHT after he says "Why didn't you tell her?", so... Yeah
epic fail cinema sins epic fucken fail
what time in the video??
+Taylor Grimm 8:53
I know I was so mad I was like did you watch deathly hollows pt1 to see who "her" is
I WAS SAYING IT OUT LOUD
12:13 Lily didn't put a spell on Harry. He didn't die because when Lily sacrificed himself for him, he got protected by true love.
YIINX yes, and because she died for him. And it's so funny he said "this should have been cast on everybody at hogwarts" when it actually was the case once Harry sacrified for them. A lot is explained in the book but sadly not in the movies
YIINX just like Gaara and his mom if anyone here watches Naruto or boruto
I thought the same xD
When he said that "this should have been cast on everybody", I thought: what do you want to do?? Gather all their parents and make them throw themselves at you while you try to kill their kids with an unforgivable curse??
YIINX okay was Lilly a Man?
It was cast on everyone, that's why in the books voldermort couldn't silence everyone permanently, they were protected. Harry sacrificed himself as his mother did, which gave everyone that same protection spell.
Bellatrix's wand was stolen, so they knew about it. If Hermione presented the wand they would have know that something was not right.
I love the split in the comments here. Everyone is either pissed at CinemaSins for "bashing" Harry Potter, or appreciating them for the sins that are mostly validated. Can't there be a mix of both? I love the Harry Potter movies and would defend them as good movies till the day I die, but these videos are so funny to me and I can't help but agree with a lot of points made in them.
You showed your hand with how you split the groups. One is "whiny HP fanboys pissed at CS for bashing HP when it's all explained in the books" and the other is "whiny CS fanboys screaming SATIRE! You don't get CS! Books don't matter." Both are equally nauseating.
@@alfredj.periwinkle4481 Too bad you will as well
I love Harry Potter but not the movies. The movies (except for 1, 2, and 7 part 1) are crap. They remove over half of what was in the books and destroy the entire spirit of the series. If anything, CS should sin the movies even more (+1000) for not following the books at all.
@@jamiecoleman5007Brilliant observation. Could not have thought of it myself. Well done, old chap.
Well theres a couple things that dont make sense. For instance, he sinned them saying "you know who" after they've said Voldemort in the previous movie. well in the last movie its fairly obvious, and they figured it out, that voldemort put a spell on his name. He would know the exact location of anyone who said his name since they would be deemed a threat, and he knew harry would say his name. Its explained in the movies and the book because the death eaters found them after the wedding, so there is absolutely no reason to sin that at all. Now is love CS to death and love their humor, but cmon some of this was pure ignorance to the movies...
No No No.Harry's Son's name should be Albus Severus Lucius Granger Weasley Potter
Albus severus hagrid draco granger ron lily james harry potter jr.
Albus Severus Voldemort Hagrid Draco Mcgonagall Gryffindor Quddictch Seeker Granger Weasly Potter Jr. That right there sums up everything about harry potter and thats also the new name of his son because..i said so
SuRge TriAl Good name except remove Voldemort. That would be a terrible name in the wizarding world even if said wizard is dead!
Albus Severus Rubeus Draco Godric Cedric Dean Thomas Griphook Neville REMUS Potter Jr.
Because what about poor Moony? Harry names his kids after his dad, his godfather, his headmaster/mentor/grandfather-figure, and the fucking potions master that loved his mom?
ok i get naming a kid after snape, but you'd think the mentor/uncle?-figure/man who made you his own kid's freaking godfather! would get priority. Couldn't JK have given them a another kid named like Arthur Remus, or Rubeus Remus, or idk, Dobby Remus? Dobby Remus Potter. Has a nice ring to it actually.
Also, Lily Luna, named after his mom and... a friend that was kind of helpful? and happens to still be alive, making her the only one to be named after a living person, which is fine, there aren't really a lot of dead women in Harry's life, but she could have been Lily Nymphadora? no nvm that's sounds dumb. If we're going with living people then what it SHOULD have been was Lily Molly, or even Lily Minerva. Hell "Minerva" is a nice echo of "Ginevra" so if JK wanted to have a Lily Luna, why couldn't she make a Minerva Molly too? They could even call her "Minny"
Ok, new official canon, Harry and Ginny had five kids:
James Sirius, Albus Severus, Lily Luna, Dobby Remus and Minerva Molly.
MooSurvivedTheTitanic true
Turn all the horcruxes into needles, throw them into random haystacks around the world. Profit.
Sasha , get an oversized magnetic. or Make spell that let's you attract metallic objects of certain size/shape/weight to the tip of your wand. Because an someone forced the truth out of you by "imperio".....
I think the issue with this is that horcruxes must be accessed by someone who is alive, so he couldn't just make a rock and throw it into the ocean as no one would be able to use it to bring him back to life.
@@harshivpatel6238 If you use 'imperio' it just physically makes him do what you want. Not access memorys. If you want that you have to use Veritasetum a, potion.
@@jasonm7684 Not necessarily. You can if you want to you just can't access it. Dumbledore explains that he wanted to access it in case he wanted to move it or something of the sort.
@@Josh-mc6cb nope, imperio gives control over mind and mind is free to obey or not obey (amount dependent on subject's mental strenght) body is still controlled by subject but mind is subverted to do as curse caster asks, thus one can play with subject's mind, and thus extract information without torture, of course not everybody would be skilled enough at the curse to successfully do it by imperio but, the control is over mind and not body, read the book 4 where it's used multiple times, body doesn't move without bodyowner's wish, mind is manipulated to think that doing as caster asks is the right thing to do.
“Volde Post-Mortem”
Soooo you’re sinning Harry for killing Voldemort. Jesus, I think jeremy's a death-eater
@@dogsdreamtoo8427 what?
The confetti is to blame, in my opinion.
@@dogsdreamtoo8427 No one on Earth was suggesting that, so clearly *you* connected the idea of The Real Slim Shadow knowing his name, and The Real Slim Shadow being smart.
@@The_Real_Slim_Shadow94 man idk what the fuck was going on in my head when I typed that. It’s embarrassing.
@@TomBruhh yeah that was a fucking stupid and pointless comment.