You Won't Believe How Far This Yukon Denali Diesel Will Go On One Tank! Road Trip Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2024
  • ( www.tfltruck.com ) I Drive a New 2021 GMC Yukon Denali Duramax Diesel Until the Last Drop of Fuel! Here is how far this luxury cruiser can go!
    Get your limited edition TFL T-shirts from the Duck Co. before they’re gone. That’s right, once they’re sold out, they’re gone forever. Go to (www.duckco.com/tfl-store) today!
    ( / tflcar ) Visit our Patreon page to support the TFL team!
    Watch more videos from TFL Studios:
    The Fast Lane Truck ( / tfltruck )
    The Fast Lane Car ( / tflcar )
    TFLoffroad ( / tfloffroad )
    TFLbike ( / @tflbike )
    TFLnow ( / tflnow )
    TFLclassics ( / tflclassics )
    TFLtalk ( / tfltalk )
    TFL Podcasts:
    TFL Talkin' Cars Podcast ( tflcar.libsyn.com/ )
    TFL Talkin' Trucks Podcast ( tfltruck.libsyn.com/ )
    #GMCYukon #Denali #Duramax
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @Marc-nc9yv
    @Marc-nc9yv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +368

    My bladder doesn’t have 600 mile range

    • @lyleswavel320
      @lyleswavel320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Get some depends, problem solved or bottle

    • @gfinnstrom
      @gfinnstrom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lyleswavel320 or catheter

    • @ColeSpolaric
      @ColeSpolaric 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lyleswavel320 reminds me of dumb and dumber when the cop drank the pee 🤣

    • @youtubeaccount9058
      @youtubeaccount9058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think it's really just so you can go a couple hundred miles between fillups when towing.

    • @flotz31
      @flotz31 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ha, Gatorade bottle.

  • @billyng2890
    @billyng2890 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    The important bit is that the vehicle has a 24 gallon tank, which means you had almost another 2 gallons left go. You had another 8% of the tank left to go which would have given you 8% more range, or roughly 49 more miles. So 660 miles would have been the full tank.

    • @81BOOKS
      @81BOOKS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That’s correct. Well done sir 🫡

    • @levilangley8744
      @levilangley8744 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Imagine if it had a 30 gallon tank. Or even a 36 gallon

    • @johnlesica4657
      @johnlesica4657 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@levilangley8744 I imagine you could probably get a 30 Gallon tank if you bought the Duramax in the Silverado.

    • @SunnyWu
      @SunnyWu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@levilangley8744 The Yukon XL has 38 gallons.

  • @filup7419
    @filup7419 3 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    The best I’ve gotten on my 2020 3.0 Silverado 4X4 was 735 miles on a tank with over 31 MPG. When I drive in the Dallas city traffic and still get 25-26 MPG, I never complain. Easily the best truck I’ve ever owned.

    • @abseconPC
      @abseconPC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You could probably get better than 30 if you go 55 miles per hour

    • @TheRamosss
      @TheRamosss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Similar results here. Love my 2021 Silverado 3.0 Z71. So smooth and it really moves when you want it to without much perceived effort.

    • @VaanRavi
      @VaanRavi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't get 25 mpg on a Silverado. Stop lying

    • @filup7419
      @filup7419 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@VaanRavi you should probably do more research before replying again. The 3.0 Duramax gets amazing mileage.

    • @gavin7225
      @gavin7225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VaanRavi mine gets 33 highway 🤷‍♂️

  • @Double_deuce22
    @Double_deuce22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +273

    I bought the wife a 2020 Silverado 1500 crew cab 4wd rst with the 3.0 Duramax. She has traveled 20k miles since new and her mpg on the latest trip to Taos and back to Golden was 30.1 mpg hand calculated. She tows our 7k pound boat and gets 16 mpg. These trucks are under appreciated.

    • @robertmills794
      @robertmills794 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I have the 2021 version and it's a treat.

    • @arlynmartin91
      @arlynmartin91 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I got the 21 Silverado HD duramax for towing heavy and I love it. But if I wasn’t pulling a trailer for work and just driving empty the 1500 duramax is what I would go with probably or a suv

    • @slmjake
      @slmjake 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have a 2021 gm crew cab with the 3.0. Glad I leased it cause I need a 6.5 bed and this is the short one. Also it rolls alot in corners so I wonder how yours handles. The powertrain is incredible. If it had a higher payload and longer bed and bigger fuel tank this would be an ideal truck for me. Just wondering if you have any thoughts on your GM diesels? The hd diesel is awesome but if I had a payload of 2100 pounds and the longer bed I would be happy. Tha is for sharing your thoughts! Appreciate it.

    • @robertmills794
      @robertmills794 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@slmjake get the bilstein 6112 / 5160 shock kit, that fixes it all. Worth every penny

    • @elijahmontgomery4146
      @elijahmontgomery4146 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Duramax is legit for sure.

  • @gregcavanaugh6259
    @gregcavanaugh6259 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Just drove with the family from the bottom of Texas to the northwest corner of New Mexico through the night in our 2006 Yukon Denali. With 1/2 the mileage I still think I stopped only 3 times for fuel, and usually b/c somebody needed the bathroom. This diesel version would have been awesome, less waking up...more peace for dad!

  • @slscamg
    @slscamg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    At the end of the day it’s a giant heavy box being pushed through the air at 80mph. I’m super impressed. Where the speed limits are lower if if you were going 65 to get the max range this thing would probably be knocking on 30mpg door.

    • @scottgas1299
      @scottgas1299 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      aero starts becoming a big issue around 80 mph. Even worse for bricks like this. At a steady 70 it would probably gain 2mpg or so. NOW, take that thing down I10 where it is nice and flat and low altitude and I bet 30mpg is definitely possible at 70mpg. Stay in traffic maybe behind an 18 wheeler where the big rig is pushing all the air and it would be even better.

    • @bryanlam9886
      @bryanlam9886 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He was only going 60 mph

    • @scottgas1299
      @scottgas1299 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@bryanlam9886 at 1 point he mentioned doing a legal 75.

    • @WizzardMcCoy
      @WizzardMcCoy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks for the info... me personally.. never over 65.. don’t give a rats butt about doing 80..
      I’m old.. o where to be in a hurry

    • @gavinhassett479
      @gavinhassett479 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@scottgas1299 higher altitude will bring better mileage in turbo charged engine. Less drag in the thinner air, easier to push through. The engine can still make all the pwr it needs.

  • @thebluebumblebee7309
    @thebluebumblebee7309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    You drove east with the prevailing winds behind you and descended from 5,430 feet to 810 feet. Test needs to be a round trip.

    • @erickempf2505
      @erickempf2505 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      100%

    • @00hehateme00
      @00hehateme00 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      would the elevation and available oxygen to the engine counter this?

    • @1970351C2V
      @1970351C2V 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No. I got 475mi to a tank of gas in a Ford Explorer once driving from Denver to Amarillo.

    • @thebluebumblebee7309
      @thebluebumblebee7309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@00hehateme00 Today's electronically controlled turbos largely eliminate the effect of altitude, and we're only talking about 5,400 feet.

    • @00hehateme00
      @00hehateme00 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thebluebumblebee7309 that makes sense. ive made this trip in an older e350 and i had troubles starting it up there, might have been a fluke. but havent had any issues back in Iowa.

  • @cb2536
    @cb2536 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    This guy loves his leather jacket. Wild Hogs Mode engage

    • @Astrand1
      @Astrand1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Was thinking the same thing! Going on a long car ride like that I would have taken my jacket off and got comfortable. I hate wearing a coat if I’m in the car for a long ride.

    • @MrFg1980
      @MrFg1980 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Astrand1 never wear a coat in the car. It's bad juju

  • @warlockjunkie
    @warlockjunkie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    “It’s such a creamy ride” 🤣

    • @MyWatchIsEnded
      @MyWatchIsEnded 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's what she said!!

    • @mikefoehr235
      @mikefoehr235 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MyWatchIsEnded I bet she did

    • @JW-hf1oc
      @JW-hf1oc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Beat me too it . Creepy !

    • @collincarter1564
      @collincarter1564 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I skipped right onto him saying it making it even funnier

    • @ed5649
      @ed5649 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was gonna like your comment, but there’s 69 likes on it which makes it perfect

  • @glenndavis3313
    @glenndavis3313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you brother.. You always do a great job you and your team with giving accurate and real world testing with helping consumers with their purchase selection. You are incredibly honest and hilarious. Love all your videos. .

  • @AJ_76421
    @AJ_76421 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have a 2019 Tahoe PPV 4x4. On a recent 90 mile drive I was able to average 23.7 mpg of highway driving with cruise control set to 65 mph. GM has definitely got the range game figured out!

  • @TurboT45H
    @TurboT45H 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just picked up 21 Yukon with Diesel, 4x4. Almost identical mileage to video. Just made maiden trip to western NC. Flatlands and mountain (or what NC calls mountains) conditions and we have averaged 25.7 mpg for our first 1300 miles.
    Zero squawks on the truck so far. Delivery time (special ordered it) was two months.
    You’ll love the ride.
    Cheers

  • @KeystoneTexan
    @KeystoneTexan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I drove a 2021 Sierra AT4 crew cab with that same motor a couple weeks ago and man do I really love that engine and transmission combo!

    • @angeloalberico1699
      @angeloalberico1699 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely love my 2020 Sierra 4x4 with the LM2 / 10 speed trans! Best ride and blows me away how fast you can get a vehicle like that moving. Time to get the PedalMonster to fix that slow pedal response!

  • @coryw.9086
    @coryw.9086 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow! This is at the very top of my list for our next family vehicle. Can’t beat the capabilities and the great fuel economy.

  • @HtownP
    @HtownP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ive owned mine 1500 RST duramax for a lil over a yr. Took 1 trip over 600 miles on 1 tank with about a 1/4 tank left over. Houston-uvalde-garner state park-river walk-Houston all on 1 tank of diesel. Very impressed with this motor to this point.

  • @machfive916
    @machfive916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent video Nathan (& Case). This seems like an incredible road-trip vehicle. A true "family truckster"!

  • @Nyth63
    @Nyth63 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My 1983 2wd Suburban with the 6.2L Detroit diesel gets 25 mpg. It has a 40 gallon fuel tank. That is a 1000 mi range. I have never put more than 900 miles on a tank though (which was a 36 gallon fill up).

  • @job1bf
    @job1bf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I do believe it. I have a ‘14 Touareg Tdi ( I can thank Nathan for his endorsement review - remember that?). I can routinely get 600 miles on a tank and still have about 1/4 tank or 150 miles of range left. Diesels FTW...very impressive. Avg 27-28mpg. I can get over 30 if I slow down below 70. Drag is a Drag!

  • @uncareid5557
    @uncareid5557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My father in law had a Diesel Suburban with a 40 gallon tank back in the 1980's. He could get from NY to Florida without stopping for fuel, easy 850 miles with four or five gallons to spare. And he drove like a madman.

  • @georgeg6036
    @georgeg6036 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only YT channel I trust for car reviews. Thanks guys!

  • @jackylsmith8138
    @jackylsmith8138 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    My last 2 vehicles can go over 700 miles on a tank of fuel. 2013 VW Passat TDI. On road trips it can get over 50 mpg and has a 18.5 gallon tank that is 925 miles per tank. My 2016 F-150 gets about 21 mpg on long road trips and has a 36 gallon tank. That’s 756 miles per tank. No I’m not driving 55 mph either average speed is 70-72 mph. F-150 is fully loaded with 4 people and bed full of suitcases and coolers.

    • @slmjake
      @slmjake 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you tell me more about your f150 and the engine and the axle ratio? That is good mileage loaded. I am looking at another f150 with heavy duty payload package and that requires 3.75. Still debating which engine on this one. Liked the 5.0 but was considering the 3.5 this time.

    • @BuckingHorse-Bull
      @BuckingHorse-Bull 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@slmjake dont get a 3.5 Simple answer No Replacement for Displacement Get the 5.0

    • @SwopetheDope
      @SwopetheDope 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@slmjake Sounds like the 5.0

    • @namtrinh4695
      @namtrinh4695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@slmjake i got a 2015 f150 platinum , 36 gallon gas tank, with a 3.5 ecoboost 6speed tranny and I can get 700 miles on a long road trip

    • @Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix
      @Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had a 2013 pasta tdi and loved it!

  • @thearcadeventures
    @thearcadeventures 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Amazing Review Nathan. This video Actually makes me want to get the yukon denali. Stay Healthy and stay safe :)

  • @victormelendez4669
    @victormelendez4669 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That’s pretty amazing!!! Love the new Yukon

  • @anthonychs
    @anthonychs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    another great review. we want more Nathan!

  • @n8stop
    @n8stop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dang I’m in Iowa and watch you guys all the time!

  • @michaelllado184
    @michaelllado184 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Really awesome truck, i rented one out for a week when my car was getting repaired. Returned it without filling up the tank 😂

  • @emmanuelcharles38
    @emmanuelcharles38 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hey Nathan,. This is like 10x re-watching this video. actually this was the firs TFL video to watch and this video made me subscribe to TFL since early 2022, sending lots of appreciations to TFL from Dar Es Salaam Tanzania

  • @bmartin7828
    @bmartin7828 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video, thanks Nathan and Chase. Love these mpg videos.

  • @andrewsmith9575
    @andrewsmith9575 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Cool truck! Road trip! Nice review guys!

  • @braydenmartindale
    @braydenmartindale 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I took the 6.2L V8(last model) and was impressed for what it was honestly did over 500mi and I filled at 1/4 tank.

    • @salami99
      @salami99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Crazy! would love to see that tested. Im guessing that has cylinder deact?

  • @wil-zd6st
    @wil-zd6st 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the 2020 Silverado drove it to Mexico and back and I’m loving it, best truck I ever had, I’m at 20k miles and this truck doesn’t stop amazing me, I pull my 23ft boat with double axle trailer and it hauls it without a problem, it rides like a Cadillac so smooth

  • @MrBull-zc6xt
    @MrBull-zc6xt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You guys have the coolest job on the planet!!!

  • @themightymrpink
    @themightymrpink 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Can’t wait to see y’all take the Suburban diesel on the Ike Gauntlet!

    • @andyb4796
      @andyb4796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Only 240 hp and mediocre torque. Compared to European diesel SUV‘s, this isn’t much

    • @Ivan-sm4dq
      @Ivan-sm4dq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@andyb4796 277 hp, learn to read

    • @themightymrpink
      @themightymrpink 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@andyb4796 Wrong. The 3.0 Liter Duramax diesel makes 277 horsepower (At 3,000 RPM) and 460 lb-ft of torque (At 1,500 RPM).

    • @cup_and_cone
      @cup_and_cone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@andyb4796 460lb-ft is mediocre?

    • @iggy-pg6gq
      @iggy-pg6gq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@cup_and_cone That's what I thought. I have the 3.0L in my Tahoe, love it, no shortage of power. It's no rocket, but it never leaves me needing more....

  • @mleavitt8104
    @mleavitt8104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    My 03 trailblazer cruises @ 75mph @ 2,000 rpm
    So 1,200rpm for a truck that size is impressive

    • @clintmullins4406
      @clintmullins4406 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tach says 1700 in the video. Not sure what he’s talking about.

    • @Axel_sms
      @Axel_sms 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mine does 2600 on 86 mph (140kmh limit) 2007 has to be the worst highway cruiser ever considering steering is manual labor after 60mph lmao

  • @gabrielmartin2678
    @gabrielmartin2678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Fact:
    “Millions of people in Asia & Europe was using cars/trucks that were diesel fed for many years, and save tons of money.”
    In the USA, they kept on pushing away manufacturers, especially the Asian companies in bringing here their 4 to 6 cylinders Diesel engines, to protect the GAS GUZZLING engines that the big 3 car companies making for decades, to protect the OIL companies in North America, and even those from overseas, period.
    Have a great day to y’all!

    • @zeljkodjukic5889
      @zeljkodjukic5889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely right 100 % good job real true 👍👍👍

    • @RobG001
      @RobG001 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn right, I had a Rover 45 2.0L diesel, (Honda Civic with a Rover diesel engine) with only a 55 litre tank and could get over 600 miles on a long trip, (55 litre =14.5 US liquid gallon, 12 imperial gallon) 50 mpg no problem (or 720 mpg US gallons)

  • @weberjeff
    @weberjeff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Loved the potential. I’d like to see how this engine does over time. Hard to give up my 03 diesel excursion with the 6.0L though. Cortez to Denver on a half a tank. It still gets 19 MPG and with a 44 gal tank can do over 800 miles on a tank(calculated). Seeing this GMC and the Chevy get 25MPG is awesome. Now if they would get the Z71 or AT4 in the diesel, that may tip me towards a replacement. Also a bigger fuel tank.

    • @trentopinto5
      @trentopinto5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm with ya. The AT4 Yukon XL has the most controlled ride of any vehicles I've driven, but they don't offer the 3.0L Duramax, and I'd love to see that.

  • @JakeN41
    @JakeN41 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have the Sierra Denali and I find it's almost always about 2mpg more when I manually calculate it vs the trip odometer average. I average about 29 on the highway, more if it's really flat like in Illinois. Also, just wait till you get 5 or 6k on the odometer. It gets a bit better from there too.

  • @joep6807
    @joep6807 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My 2001 Ford Excursion with 7.3 went 750 miles on a single tank! Maybe someday when it quits I’ll be looking at a Denali

    • @job1bf
      @job1bf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which on a 7.3 will be never...

    • @kevinhughes1111
      @kevinhughes1111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a 2000 ford excursion with 7.3.
      Our miles per gallon is 12 on the highway at 2100 rims.
      The old fuel was better for the excursion.
      I do use LUCAS, AND SEAFOAM

    • @hugolafhugolaf
      @hugolafhugolaf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But what is the size of the tank? A 747 can cover a lot of miles with a single tank too. However...

    • @kevink6420
      @kevink6420 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Apples to oranges. A 7.3 powerstroke didn’t have to comply with modern emissions…which is why it’s one of the best diesels ever built and why it’s still going.

  • @SaltyTubers
    @SaltyTubers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My 1984 Suburban 6.2 diesel had a 40 gal tank and got 20mpg no matter where I drove it. By this point in automotive engineering history I would have hoped for more than 25MPG... Pretty truck though.

  • @IronmanV5
    @IronmanV5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    A new meaning to the question "Are we there yet?"

  • @pulvermacher80
    @pulvermacher80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    And people know that have a modern diesel u will always get better fuel economy with summer fuel! So this little duramax will probably get closer to the 30mpg during the summer.

    • @angeloalberico1699
      @angeloalberico1699 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've had my 2020 Sierra 1500 i6 3.0 LM2 for a year and that is a very true statement.

    • @koopspook
      @koopspook 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@angeloalberico1699 whats the range on it

    • @angeloalberico1699
      @angeloalberico1699 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@koopspook a few months ago I made a trip from Brian Head, UT to Long Beach (700 miles) and still had more than a 1/4 tank. I pushed that tank (city driving) for the next week and fueled up when my range was "LOW" it gave me 781 miles, on ONE tank! On the road it's a king!

  • @JRJROFFROAD
    @JRJROFFROAD 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love my 3.0 Duramax. Mine is lifted and on 35's and with a truck full of gear and two adults, I drove from Denver to Phoenix on a tank and a half.

  • @jimmysgarage9068
    @jimmysgarage9068 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video was well done. I RARELY can watch a TFL video from start to finish without fast forwarding. This was great though.

  • @cmdrdarwin3682
    @cmdrdarwin3682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Very impressive with that large of a vehicle👍

  • @WW-wf8tu
    @WW-wf8tu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great to see you on this channel doing this type of review Nathan. Great editing. Nice trip. Over 10 hours 1 way! Will you be my road trip driver? lol

    • @NathanDAdlen
      @NathanDAdlen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      TFL Studios leases me out by the hour. 😁

  • @ericchalmers5668
    @ericchalmers5668 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yup…I own a 2021 Chevy Silverado with the 3.0L Duramax. Nashville to Pittsburgh on one tank of diesel with roughly 180 miles left on the tank when I parked it. Love it.

  • @josephdent7160
    @josephdent7160 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video. Thanks. Consumers need to do videos like this when they purchase new vehicles. Very informative..real life.

  • @wiscokid9890
    @wiscokid9890 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Have missed Nathan in videos

  • @jonnycieslak
    @jonnycieslak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Love my 2020 Silverado 3.0L “when it’s not at the dealer” had injector harness replaced, new ECM, multi tension problems with the harness and now it’s at dealer with a turbo issue..... lost all confidence in the vechile.. probably going back to gas. It’s sucks because like I said when it’s not being repaired it’s awesome

    • @Jay-mr8wj
      @Jay-mr8wj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I heard you,it's such a nice truck but because is a first year of this diesel engine it has so many problems what a shame.
      I dont know if newer trucks have the same issues

    • @devioux4082
      @devioux4082 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You need to get exempt diesel truck (depending where you live) and have all that junk removed from your engine. As soon as my 6.6 duramax was no longer under warranty I removed all the junk off of it and now the engine runs better than when it was new and has not needed to go to the shop since I removed all of that other than just regular maintenance. EGR & DPF will slowly destroy your engine and you’ll be lucky to get 200k miles out of it. With the EGR and DPF it’s just a matter of time before something malfunctions on the system and the computer puts you in to limp mode and leave you on the side of the highway.

  • @hkm_865
    @hkm_865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pretty cool that GM put the lines on the engine cover reminiscent of the 6.5 turbo diesel

  • @travishackney4268
    @travishackney4268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I appreciate the fact that you didn’t just use the on board mileage computer , but did the real way of checking miles per gallon instead , because that is the only real way to check this for accuracy
    IM IMPRESSED THAT WOULD MAKE ME AND MANY OTHERS WANT TO GO BACK TO DIESEL

  • @06colkurtz
    @06colkurtz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Yessssss And not once was the word scratchy plastic used in the creation of this video! Happy Tuesday.

    • @danh655
      @danh655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm just over 6'2 hehe

    • @anthonyc1883
      @anthonyc1883 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danh655 I think that must be a hiring requirement at TFL.

  • @pcfry8732
    @pcfry8732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dang, it would have been cool if you guys had held a fan meet-up in Iowa!

  • @erineopenaloza8311
    @erineopenaloza8311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Excited bout this! We have a 2015 Q7 TDI and been waiting for a diesel that can maybe replace this Q7. Would love some newer tech.

    • @lapamful
      @lapamful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I'm from Europe originally, and never understood why America wasn't more enthused with diesels for your big, heavy trucks. Glad to see they're becoming more popular now. They're incredible and really annoy the greenies too 🤣 They get even more annoyed if you tell them there's no way EVs can compete with diesels on pollution (over the vehicle's lifetime).

    • @dubson461
      @dubson461 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a 2011 Q7 TDI.
      I will keep it a little longer.
      It does really well.

    • @RoidMidget
      @RoidMidget 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dubson461 let me know how you feel about it after replacing the timing chains and $2k brake jobs

    • @relaxation2380
      @relaxation2380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lapamful gas use to be really cheap compared to diesel. Plus diesel engines use to be very loud and caused alot of pollution. But that's all changed diesel is now the same price as gas and they aren't loud coal rollers like they use to be

    • @thomashutchison3892
      @thomashutchison3892 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@relaxation2380khjkkkjk k

  • @user-wq8bh4ct3u
    @user-wq8bh4ct3u 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    And that's with winter blend fuel and at altitude. Easily capable of low 30s mpg

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Is winter blend still being used? And is the consensus that vehicles get less fuel economy at altitude? I kinda had the impression that the reduced drag evened out the fewer air molecules that enter the engine.

    • @JohnDoe-nz6bk
      @JohnDoe-nz6bk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wrong. I barely got 23 mpg out of summer blend.

    • @BiggMo
      @BiggMo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Diesel is season blended?

    • @JohnDoe-nz6bk
      @JohnDoe-nz6bk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrewsbbq nope

    • @oak8728
      @oak8728 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The blend does not effect mpg in any discernible way. Your time warming up, foot, speed, air temps etc all greatly effect the seasonal difference.

  • @blueryxfalls7949
    @blueryxfalls7949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Hello Nathan. Nice to have you today

    • @calholli
      @calholli 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      big pp

  • @tf7274
    @tf7274 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got 860km on a tank from my 2003 toyota corolla going down hill from the rockies to the plains on single fill... wind, elevation, driving style make a difference. Tires make a huge difference.

  • @fabulousoffroaddesigns5080
    @fabulousoffroaddesigns5080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    You still had about 2 gallons of fuel left, so you could have driven another 50 miles.

  • @clevejason
    @clevejason 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This thing is still brand new. Let’s see how much better it does with 50k or so on the drivetrain once it’s fully ran in.

    • @evoemperor3776
      @evoemperor3776 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meeh it will probably lose mpg because of the epa crap on it.

  • @rossbone2323
    @rossbone2323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In Canada,..that’s 34.4 mpg ( Imperial gallon ) . That’s amazing for that large SUV. I’m sold 👍❤️

  • @jakeberg6758
    @jakeberg6758 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thank you. Epic range !!!!

  • @meatball1080
    @meatball1080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My 2014 RAM 1500 4x2 crew cab with the 5.7 made it from West Palm to Atlanta (589 miles) with about a 1/4 tank left. Drove the 70 mph speed limit the entire time on cruise control, averaged 29.6 mpg hand calculated at the pump. I am amazed at how far technology has come and the capabilities of modern vehicles. That Denali is truly impressive for a heavy, full sized awd vehicle.

    • @JohnnyAnderson1
      @JohnnyAnderson1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      somebody dumped about 10 gallons of fuel in your tank when you weren't looking

    • @Ashley-vi3by
      @Ashley-vi3by ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya really lol, I have a 2022 ram 5.7 and it's not good on fuel

    • @BabyBang17datruth
      @BabyBang17datruth 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      First I heard a V8 with that good of fuel economy

  • @donE37100
    @donE37100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have always taken range into consideration. Visiting family two states away often, 1200 miles. 2010 ford Fusion Hybrid would give us over 600 miles.

  • @JNC7601
    @JNC7601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +221

    Impressive for a vehicle that size. Will be curious how that engine does over time

    • @carholic-sz3qv
      @carholic-sz3qv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      I think the engine will age very well and its an in-line 6 which means easy maintenance.

    • @Msalazar6sicVI
      @Msalazar6sicVI 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      This isn't really a new Engine, it is an Isuzu design who almost only make diesel engines.

    • @kebabremover6571
      @kebabremover6571 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Probably 150k miles and that's it.

    • @jnk26
      @jnk26 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      That's OK range. My 2019 powerstroke with the 189L(48gal) tank routinely ran more than 1600km(1000miles) on one fill. Thats a 9400lb(8500lb curb weight) crew cab longbox 4x4 pickup my 2020 is only the 36 gal so I'm running 1200km(745 miles) per tank. Both trucks can tow 22000lbs, and the 2020 0-60 in 6.6 sec. I say load up that Yukon to max GVWR(7 or 8 passengers) and try the test again lol

    • @kebabremover6571
      @kebabremover6571 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@icare7151 inline engines do tend to be more reliable, but this is a modern I6 from modern GM.

  • @johnmeyer655
    @johnmeyer655 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My 2015 GMC Sierra 2500 HD Denali with the 6.6l gave me 697 miles on a single tank. I added 34.3 gallons to the 36 gallon tank so we could have gone 700 miles on a tank easily. Like you, we were not interested in getting the best fuel economy, just driving. We averaged 63mph over the two days between fill ups. The trip computer said we got 22.9 mpg but the calculated rate was actually 20.3 mpg. Truly an amazing range.

  • @JuanLopez-pd8kc
    @JuanLopez-pd8kc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bought one of the first 2020 gmc sierra 3.0, i just put a 110000km last week, i have not had any problem with it, besides oil change and fuel filter change! Loveing it fwd i do a mix of towing and empty, i get avg 30mpg thats in Canada traveling from AB to Ont all the time

    • @JuanLopez-pd8kc
      @JuanLopez-pd8kc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think that is the highest km truck of this engine out there

  • @THESLlCK
    @THESLlCK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    For road use, diesel vehicles have always been better. A standard roadgoing hybrid diesel electric vehicle can get an easy 85+mpg
    Hell, my father's Passat TDI got 48mpg with a 42mpg rating. Diesel is insane.

    • @redpilljesus
      @redpilljesus 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Diesel destroys air quality. "Clean" diesel destroys vehicles.
      You're right about the hybrid aspect: companies have _needed_ to make hybrids for the last two decades and have simply dragged their feet.

  • @dommm111
    @dommm111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Man, I really like that badass jacket. Good video Nathan

  • @budlite8207
    @budlite8207 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bought a Sierra 1500 AT4 , 3 ltr diesel March 2. Watching this just after a 400 mile road trip from Portland, OR area to NE Spokane area, we averaged 26mpg empty. Speeds were 77 to 85 most of the way. Lots of hills and wind. Way home, today, we got 15.5 mpg with a Uhaul trailer, I'm guessing around 5000lbs loaded. Same weather conditions but we averaged around 70 mph most of the way. Great truck and engine...plenty of power.

  • @robedmund9948
    @robedmund9948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wasn't too long ago that 26 mpg in a luxury CAR was doing well. MY! How far things have come!!

  • @denisbrisebois7658
    @denisbrisebois7658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That’s excellent MPGs ... 👍👍.

  • @TruckEnthusiastYT
    @TruckEnthusiastYT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    My Mom is looking at the Tahoe, Yukon or X5 to replace her old Yukon. I will have to show her this video

    • @ghostmofo5829
      @ghostmofo5829 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Yes. Tell her she would have to stop and pee 3 times before filling up on gas.

    • @Tomaskii
      @Tomaskii 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ghostmofo5829 or diesel

    • @calholli
      @calholli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just get your mom an Acura MDX or Lexus and you won't need to "replace the old Yukon".

    • @TruckEnthusiastYT
      @TruckEnthusiastYT 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      calholli what do you mean

    • @elihernandez330
      @elihernandez330 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wouldn't buy the diesel if she wants to own it for more than 80k. Rubber belt driven oil pump behind the engine is such a failure.

  • @Robertxcapricorn
    @Robertxcapricorn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for a nice and useful presentation

  • @4406bbldb
    @4406bbldb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well long ago i was a test driver that certified the fuel numbers that manufactures put on window stickers. I always got better mileage then other drivers. I still have a need to watch these videos.

  • @got_to_roll
    @got_to_roll 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video! Diesel over hybrid? I've never owned a diesel, this is intriguing.

    • @wayando
      @wayando 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Diesels always been good with range on one tank ... Their only alleged problem is nox emissions ... And they have alot of torque for pulling very heavy stuff.
      I have Toyota with 3.0L and I have raced with smaller cars from light to light while carrying 400Kg load.

  • @Thumpdaddy
    @Thumpdaddy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I love this, I just want to see how they hold up in the long run and hopefully I can get a 2022 Escalade ESV Diesel. I'm pretty sure they would be able to add a larger fuel tank by then.

    • @MrFg1980
      @MrFg1980 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Make you a nice vehicle...

    • @reserva120
      @reserva120 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      you should ten or fifteen years before you buy to see how they hold up... " wow being stupid is easyz"

    • @moparjr89
      @moparjr89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gm wont but aftermarket will make one

  • @franferrario7425
    @franferrario7425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally somebody that understands diesels!!

  • @rainertripes7447
    @rainertripes7447 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I drove 677 miles with my 13 y old Land Rover Discovery 3 6 cyl 2.7 Turbo Diesel. The fuel capacity is about 22,4 gallons, the fuel consumtion just below 400 gallons per 100 miles ;)

  • @andreiivanov1674
    @andreiivanov1674 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hi guys, thanks for great videos! Would be very interesting to see MPG test F-150 Hybrid vs RAM1500 eTorque.

    • @imathreat209
      @imathreat209 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The ram etorqe isn't exactly the hybrid people think it is, it's literally something that is only activate for seconds when you start acceleration. A smoother transaction when for your engine start/stop mode when in traffic

    • @andreiivanov1674
      @andreiivanov1674 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imathreat209 Sure we know the difference, but there is reason to see what is real hybrid benefit, if it is in the truck segment.

  • @mz6187
    @mz6187 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Badass, I’m currently on the hunt for a Silverado 1500 3.0l

    • @angeloalberico1699
      @angeloalberico1699 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good luck, they are the "white whales" of trucks! I was lucky and found one 2 weeks into Lockdown when the car industry took a big hit. Love my truck!

    • @mz6187
      @mz6187 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@angeloalberico1699 there are several dealerships that have a couple of them in my area

  • @wbball15
    @wbball15 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for visiting Cubby's in Blair, NE for your fuel stop.

  • @Mr91495osh
    @Mr91495osh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My best vehicle ever was my 2003 Yukon 5.3. I ran it 14 years and 182,000 miles and it was still perfect when I sold it.

    • @kevinstrang11
      @kevinstrang11 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had a 2011 Yukon Denali with a 6.2 and traded it in with 317,000 miles on it and it ran like a top

  • @SwannBus
    @SwannBus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video, really helping me decide which family hauler will be next. I thought our Expedition Max was doing good at 18mpg....

    • @nomorecontent5404
      @nomorecontent5404 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll take the expedition ,GMC has poor quality long term.

    • @ryancoates872
      @ryancoates872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nomorecontent5404 most all new vehicles have poor quality long term. Including my parents new expedition thats been in the shop several times already

    • @nomorecontent5404
      @nomorecontent5404 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@icare7151 I wish you the best keep me updated

    • @OneNationUnderGod.
      @OneNationUnderGod. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We have a 2015 Yukon with the 5.3L and it has a vehicle average of 18.8mpg and that's the average of +75k miles. We've never reset one of the trip meters.
      Also the guy saying GMC quality is bad, we've never had any issues with our Yukon. GM put new tail lights on it for free and a software update to the brakes is all we've had it in the shop for. Both were recalls that GM did on their own dollar.

    • @SwannBus
      @SwannBus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nomorecontent5404 our 2018 Expedition has been in the shop several times. We are considering the GMC because of the issues we’ve had with our Ford. The cam phasers have been replaced, timing chain guides, and several other items. The cost was $6700 under warranty but that was enough to get me looking for another long-term family vehicle. Our Expedition currently has 24k miles........

  • @AgentSmith911
    @AgentSmith911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's ridiculous that people buy huge, expensive trucks and SUVs but then cheap out by not selecting the diesel powerplant which is more durable and economical.

    • @smileyguyz
      @smileyguyz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      eh, modern diesels are insanely expensive when they break.

  • @Hondo68
    @Hondo68 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ya'll are right about the headlight & 4x4 switches. I would reach down and think I'm turning on my lights for inclement weather in day time. To only find out I turned on my 4x4 drive.

  • @anthonyc1883
    @anthonyc1883 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nathan "Lemmy" Adlen probably watched/listened to the final cut of this video through gritted teeth but I happen to like the chill music that was used, starting when they hit the road at 1:45

  • @VARITHMS
    @VARITHMS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great review. I'm not one to run the fuel level to low, either. To many moving parts are lubricated by the fuel.

    • @hugolafhugolaf
      @hugolafhugolaf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So? As long as fuel is being pumped into the fuel lines, whether you're unning a full or a near-empty tank doesn't matter.

    • @VARITHMS
      @VARITHMS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hugolafhugolaf go for it then.

    • @hugolafhugolaf
      @hugolafhugolaf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VARITHMS I do it all the time. Don’t worry.

    • @PS-zw4yc
      @PS-zw4yc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s bad to starve the fuel pumps Running low vs running virtually empty? Empty is bad as the pump is cooled by the fluid it sits in as well

  • @CornFed_3
    @CornFed_3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Great video. I’ve debated getting a Yukon diesel or Escalade diesel. GM is currently killing the large SUV market.

    • @hellkitty1014
      @hellkitty1014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yukon diesel for sure. The Escalade is a show stopper most certainly, but bang for the buck is with the GMC, which tops out where the Caddy starts.

    • @xxlavenderxhedgehogxx7346
      @xxlavenderxhedgehogxx7346 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      GM has killed the large SUV market for years!!! These new diesels only lengthen that margin! Excellent job GM

    • @CornFed_3
      @CornFed_3 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hellkitty1014, not really looking at a bang for buck purchase. For me, it comes down to technology offered and obviously Caddy offers more. I’m extremely picky and order all new vehicles versus buying off the lot and I think overall, Caddy offers the most available options. Nothing wrong with a Denali but I’m leaning towards the Escalade. Don’t really care for show stopping, I just like technology 😂

    • @inducedapathy1296
      @inducedapathy1296 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CornFed_3 Cadillac specifically the Escalade has supercruise as well as all the screens. If you want autopilot you go GM at the moment it seems if it's not Tesla. The downside is GM hasn't put it into the other brands or models. I'd love to have a Redline Traverse or similar for the waifu with that. GM also doesn't offer an Onyx or blacked out package on Buick yet Chevy and Caddy have one? Weird shit.

    • @eazy1144
      @eazy1144 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The escalade with the supercruise self-driving is really freaking cool!

  • @bryanhersman4037
    @bryanhersman4037 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The TDI Touaregs had a 25 gallon tank and could easily get 30 mpg at a steady 65mph. Pretty easy 750 miles on a tank.

  • @dundonrl
    @dundonrl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know that I've seen 741 miles on the mileage remaining on my 2017 Chevy Cruze with 1.6 turbo diesel and 6 speed manual (it only has a 13.4 gallon tank). Modern diesel engines are incredible for fuel economy!

  • @shawnjordan5712
    @shawnjordan5712 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love my Duramax AT4. RT Denver to vail 28mpg+ . 33mpg coming down the hill in traffic

    • @toddbob55
      @toddbob55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      gm products are junk

    • @shawnjordan5712
      @shawnjordan5712 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@toddbob55 lol ok

    • @iggy-pg6gq
      @iggy-pg6gq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shawnjordan5712 He sure showed you!!!😂😂😂😂🙄

  • @ST-wi9eq
    @ST-wi9eq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Try that roadtrip in an EV. Diesel is the way to go!

    • @idontgotnothin
      @idontgotnothin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Shifty McGee462 they said they same thing about cars vs horses 120 years ago

    • @THESLlCK
      @THESLlCK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Shifty McGee462 EV's are good for 50 mile round trips or less

    • @THESLlCK
      @THESLlCK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@idontgotnothin horses are still better than EV's

  • @FAngus-ly8lk
    @FAngus-ly8lk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I live in mountainous British Columbia (the westernmost province of Canada), so I probably wouldn't get quite as many MPGs here as you would driving across Nebraska and Iowa. Still, very impressive. I would not have thought a big vehicle like the Denali could get such great mileage. I'll have to look into that diesel drivetrain. Thanks.

  • @chrisp2249
    @chrisp2249 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    imagine the fuel economy with no def fluid
    this video sold me. going to surprise my wife with this in the summer as ill likely have to order this.
    what a gorgeous suv

  • @towlife270
    @towlife270 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yeah I guess it's way better than my 205 miles per tank.

  • @chancethompson8686
    @chancethompson8686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Should calculate the mileage on the return trip, it's all uphill back to Boulder..

    • @michaelp.3485
      @michaelp.3485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is a very good point. Boulder Colorado is over 5000ft in elevation. Cedar Rapids Iowa is 800ft. No wonder they got 27 mpg.

  • @TimHPop776
    @TimHPop776 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible. Wow, no chance was I thinking this was even going g to be close to that!

  • @mohmoudfarah1897
    @mohmoudfarah1897 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Informative; thanks, pal!

  • @TheFailBot
    @TheFailBot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What y’all going to Cedar Rapids for?

  • @martyi398
    @martyi398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for sharing guys, the long term cost of ownership on a diesel would negate any fuel mileage range considerations on purchasing for myself

    • @jasonlarsen3515
      @jasonlarsen3515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What cost are you including?

    • @JohnDoe-nz6bk
      @JohnDoe-nz6bk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jasonlarsen3515 DEF, fuel filters, oil changes, EGR, DPF, etc etc etc.

    • @martyi398
      @martyi398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jasonlarsen3515 1. Added cost for Diesel engine and trans. 2. Diesel fuel cost versus regular gas 3. DEF 4. Emissions equipment (SCR etc) to maintain exclusive to diesel 5. Routine maintenance oil changes, fuel filters, fuel treatment etc. 6. Injector replacement, turbo charger maintenance 7. Higher cost for diesel hard parts, starters, alternators, water pumps, batteries etc.
      in the short term (3-5 years) you could possibly justify the diesel if you drive an unusually high amount of miles and or haul very heavy loads on a daily basis, long term (10 plus years) my opinion to justify the added cost you would have to be hauling heavy loads GVWR outside the capacity of gasoline drivetrain setups and or unusually high mileage as well like a Hot Shot logistics driver would do on a daily basis,
      Have a great day,
      Marty

    • @marklion315
      @marklion315 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And specific to this engine, in order to change the oil pump belt you got to drop the transmission, negating any fuel savings you had at 120k miles or so.

    • @dansherwood1043
      @dansherwood1043 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No joe, that ain't so joe. $500 to change that belt. $3500 savings to that point. Cmon man, just cuz yer named joe doesn't mean you have to fudge the truth.