It DID get everywhere. It's fine and sticky and clung to their space suits. They had to brush it off before climbing back into the LM, but they never managed to get rid of much of it. A real mess.
One would think with the lack of gravity the space dust cloud would become massive and blur out the entire surrounding area but instead it gently splashes back down around the wheels almost like earth gravity in slow motion ... but what do i know ...
It's funny how people are making this awesome remasterizations of historical videos while there are others on Instagram making they high quality 4K perfect focused and stabilized videos look like old vintage crappy clips by adding filters. People are weird.
Yeh it folded up like a little meccano car and the wheels where wire wound, I think it was great engineering feat but ultimately pointless more of a marketing gimmick for tv at the time. The astronauts where never going to go out of sight of the lander as they could of got easily gotten lost on a featureless landscape.
@@gower1973 I assume moving around on foot was pretty difficult for them though, what with the weaker gravity and stiffness of those big bulky spacesuits. At least the buggy mitigated that issue.
There isn't that much that was shot on film. The film reels were fairly short. The Apollo 11 EVA shot from the LM was set to one frame per second to allow for a longer film. Most of the videos from Apollo that you see are shot on video so don't look nearly as good as the ones shot on film.
Anyone fakers noticed that the gravity is SLOW here? 😂 The dust is settling far slower than expected on earth 🌍. So either they really were on the moon or just tuned down the gravity in that studio!
Looking at this make me realize how crazy this must have felt......to be the first human or living being in general, to stand on this moon. The first time to stand on solid ground, while also not standing on earth.
I watched them land on the moon in 1969 when I was eleven yrs. old on my grandma's tv live with the rest of the world, never forget it. Saw JFK get assinated on live tv when I was 5 yrs. old on the same tv. Sad.
all i saw previously was a pixelated retro video, which i also had uploaded to one of my Docu channels. but your video is just on another level, this is stunning work and amazing piece of history on so many levels. THANK YOU lol, guys appreciate this !!!
@@anastasiakudrina9150 You can figure that out on it's own by the fact that we see no stars or blue colours in the sky despite there being absolutely no light pollution in a desert.
Look closely at the regolith pulled up by the rear tires of the lunar rover and you will see the 'fanning' or 'feathering' effect that could only occur in a low gravity environment like the lunar surface. Pretty cool!
Millions years of evolution; Tens of tousands of men involved; The most incredible acheivement in human history; The rise of AI technologie; And after all that, all the sacrifices, all the time spend, all the efforts done... TH-cam randomly shift the vid to 144 for no god damn reason. Evolution.
@@blue3media Gravity on the Moon is 6 times lower, so yeah, it's funny to see how they try to pass it off as real Moon, not some Airforce depressurized dome on Earth.
Beautiful. I'm so upset that so much original footage was overwritten. I hope we get to see the next moon/Mars landing soon. We should really be working toward it harder as a species.
@Some One Film? The footage I'm talking about was recieved via radio signals and recorded onto analog magnetic data tapes. The magnetic tapes can be degaussed and magnetically reset to be reused.
@@curicmc The only think over written was the slow scan (10 frame per second) black and white video from Apollo 11. But nothing was lost since all of it was recorded after being converted to standard NTSC for broadcast. The video shown here was shot on 16 mm color film.
Great work! Thank you. Love how chill John Young is and also the contrasting enthusiasm of Charle's Duke. FYI, during the launch of their Saturn V, Young's heart rate was at a steady 70bpm. Charles Duke's was 144bpm.
2:43 Посмотрел в конце сравнение с оригиналом, думал там шакалы будут, а они 40 лет назад сняли лучше, чем сейчас некоторые снимают. А вообще молодцы, J-mission это конечно важно, но покатушки на вездеходе никто не отменял)
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I thought you should be able to see up to 100km in the horizon easily while standing on the surface of the moon. But here it looks like the horizon is only 500m away, unless they are on a flat area on top of a mountain on the moon, that would make sense.
Moon horizon is something like 2500 meters assuming flat ground. Also there is no atmospheric haze so this is almost impossible to distinct between small hill from 500 meters and large mountain from 10 km.
@@kebab1865 the moon isn't that small, I'm sure you could see up to 100km into the horizon. But as you said, there is no haze so we may not see the difference unlike here on earth.
@@RIFIANBOY Actually you will see just the tip of 3-km high mountain at 100 km from you on the moon. If you place view point on 1.7 meter above the ground horizon range will be 2.4 km for Moon or 4.6 km for Earth. www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/EL/calculator/radio-line-of-sight/
Imagine the fact that due to atmosphere on earth looking at the horizon we are actually seeing objects that are already below the curvature of the earth, this is called mirage I dont know about how much distance beyond the curvature we can observe, but that could be additional ~10 or maybe more kilometers, I am pretty sure that if you are interested there should be information available :) Another thing to notice is that due to lack of reference points on the moon landscape, it is actually pretty hard to distinguish which object is further away in this video. If you notice the moon rover looks quite big compared to the landing craft they used t land on the moon, it is really hard to understand distances correctly in this video.
@@S3l3ct1ve Thank you for the info. Let's hope they give us more insight next time they go to the moon (in 2024 maybe). With current 3D scanning technology we can get a virtual copy of a very large area and analyze it.
@@IntelTV Curiosity can be satisfied by the huge amount of footage available (which i confirm should be preserved in some digital form, although most already is).
@@smith507 Anything WWS2 related It's the content what matters, as long as its a good recording of audio and video. I'd directly go for an autited improvement in case audio was inaudible or incomprehensible.
Notice that the dirt falls to the ground within a few seconds. That means this was filmed in an environment without an atmosphere (the moon). And if you speed it up to match what we think of as normal speed it's even more obvious.
@@tgstudio85 He seems to be insinuating that the moon missions were fake and that this moon buggy is just a remote control car in a vacuum with a puppet at the wheel. Or he's just a troll.
@@tgstudio85 The entire scene was staged , using miniature remote vehicle and a "doll" fastened to the driver seat to look real. It failed. But cost millions.
how the F u get all this old ass videos man btw i like them man they some kind of chilling and knowing how the early lifestyle was is awesome thx for the uploads.
I just found your channel, and I feel like I have to tell you that this gave me chills and that I'm crying from amazement. It was so clear. The view point, camera and resolution are all so perfect to where I felt like you could bend down and pick up a rock. I never knew it was so totally dusty and sandy. I know it's silly, but if you had water you could probably build a sand castle on the moon. Just imagine being there. In all my 22 years, I've never saw a POV video of the moon. Really if we wipe away all our cultural notions, its quite ugly land, gray and almost nothing but dirt, not even rocky land. But it's so beautiful how it's a dead massive rock floating around our planet. That we worked hard enough and got enough money to send regular but smart people to this massive orb in our sky. That every foot print will always be there. That all those prints the moon buggy made in '72 are still there.
I like how all the people who think this fake act like they are trained physicists. It is a compliment to the scientists and engineers responsible to suggest it is unbelievable. Even their ultimate rivals, the Soviets, never uttered the word 'fake'.
And you think it's true because you were told so? If it were possible to send a man on the Moon back then, we would've had at least biyearly Moon Missions by now. Which we don't, and before Musk, US couldn't even make a rocket engine to launch its own satellites on Earth's orbit. Which is pretty much damning evidence that Apollo is one big fat hoax.
@@Inieel the reason the US stopped landing can be quite easily explained when you look at the complicated politics of the time. Which lead to reduced funding of NASA, so after the last moon landing in 72 NASA started doing longer term research missions around the solar system (First notable one was Pioneer 10 1973 flyby of Jupiter and moons then Voyager 1&2 a few years later and New Horizons and others etc) they moved to missions more for scientist then for the public. As public interest simmered off.
@@Inieel oooh god, you think those rockets and missions are soo cheap?? even the suviets had problems spending all the money on the space race and many businussmen who were told to give money did everything in their power to stop the goverment do it. and by the way you are also have been told by others to think so, so its not your research and own ideas!! you have been brainwashed and manipulated like any other guy who want think for his self?
I don't get how people can say that this footage "looks fake" when the way the dust behaves (falling back down immediately instead of staying up in the air) would only be possible in a place where there's no air at all... Such as the Moon.
Take some heavy-particle dust (like powdered iron or rust) and see how it behaves in Earth's atmosphere. It'll settle down even faster than the one on the video. BUT. The thing is - it shouldn't fall down faster than on Earth in the first place. It should stay airborne LONGER than on Earth, and it has nothing to do with air pressure, but with gravity. Moon's gravity is 17% of that on Earth. So if you take a ball of lead and drop it from 10 feet on Earth and on Moon, it will take 2,5 times longer to fall on the Moon. That's because S=a*t^2 formula, which nixes the difference pretty hard. But 17% comes into full play when it comes to negating inertia of upward-bound objects, like dust that's being thrown from under rover's wheels. It takes SIX TIMES as long for dust to start falling down on Moon than on Earth. So the wheels should produce veritable fountains of dust riding with such speed. When we compare fountains, we can pretty much ignore the atmosphere factor. While it helps particles stay afloat longer, it also hampers upward movement; thus, for fountain's longevity, it can pretty much be ignored.
@Mark Aim They didn't "lose" the tech as in "whoops, we don't know where the blueprints are, bummer !", it's lost because it's outdated. Seriously, it's already been explained several times; it's 70's tech we're talking about, what would be the point of building a 70's rocket today instead of starting from scratch to develop something safer, more advanced and adapted to today's standards ? Those guys explained it better : www.quora.com/How-is-it-that-NASA-lost-the-technology-to-go-to-the-moon-It-blew-my-mind-when-NASA-said-this
one would think by 2020, we would have 120fps of bustling Moon activity on broadcast, internet down below a thriving city of flying cars and people and business with the assistive robots cleaning our streets and keeping us safe from crime and illegal activities(which can definitely create problems of its own) but no... there isn't much going on in the world of today except someone like channel helping us feel and hope for a bright 60fps future.
@@tqnohe It's an old joke. _When NASA realized they couldn't land on the moon, they hired Stanley Kubrick to film a fake moon mission. Unfortunately for them, Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he insisted they film on location._
Laughing Gravy I know the joke. And the BS moon landing deniers’ claims. The the very fact that Neil Armstrong apparently flubbed his big line show it wasn’t Kubrick. That guy would have done 50 takes to get it right.
@@tqnohe That's a very good point actually, I'll make sure to remember that whenever I see another one of those "fake dis wuz filmd by stenly rubik!!1" guys.
1911 to 1972 Is all the time it took to go from people still traveling by carriage to landing on the moon. That’s just 1 life span
The damaged parts of the tape are when the aliens ran in front of the camera.
i think it's was
flies
I would imagine it's for something they didn't want us to see, props, a bird, a plane etc
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 direct evidence this shit is a bunch of bologna
/s
It wasnt tape. Film
@@Carl_Aznable disagree
2020: *turning old footage in 60 fps 4K*
2200: *turning modern footage into a fully interactive hologram*
in 3-4 years we will see this again in 4K live-streamed from the moon
Paying billion of dollars to play Mario kart on the moon. Thats what i call a job
"Ok max stop!"
"Ok I dont wanna do that."
"Ok excuse me."
Now is time for some JFK footage
CIA did it. He didnt want to run wars for money.
Jacek M CIA covered it up, they hired mob hit men
JFK? How about some Eisenhower footage. The guy that created the space program.
back and to the left.
9/11? Would be cool to upscale the only known footage of the first plane hitting.
I would a been like, “Yo man it’s my turn now!”
How did they fit the buggy onto the capsule?
That moon dust is so fine. I imagine it would get everywhere and ruin all modern electronics.
It DID get everywhere. It's fine and sticky and clung to their space suits. They had to brush it off before climbing back into the LM, but they never managed to get rid of much of it. A real mess.
@@MrWhipple42 Also inhaled it after coming back inside and some of them got a lunar "fever". Not good for the lungs.
@@GoldenPrune *I understood that reference*
One would think with the lack of gravity the space dust cloud would become massive and blur out the entire surrounding area but instead it gently splashes back down around the wheels almost like earth gravity in slow motion ... but what do i know ...
@@moonwvlf6919 They're on the Moon, you dolt. There is gravity, roughly 1/6th that of Earth's... But what do I know?
It's funny how people are making this awesome remasterizations of historical videos while there are others on Instagram making they high quality 4K perfect focused and stabilized videos look like old vintage crappy clips by adding filters. People are weird.
The human race, first time landing on something that isn't earth... rips skids in a space car.
5th time landing.
1st time? Lol
Its fake bro
@@ChuckBeefOG You're a fake bro
I'm pretty sure the first thing they did was draw a penis on the moon's surface but it wasn't filmed. I mean, I would.
Amazing how they all managed to fit in with the car in the tiny lander.
It folded up. www.collectspace.com//review/ap15-S71-31409.jpg
Yeh it folded up like a little meccano car and the wheels where wire wound, I think it was great engineering feat but ultimately pointless more of a marketing gimmick for tv at the time. The astronauts where never going to go out of sight of the lander as they could of got easily gotten lost on a featureless landscape.
@@gower1973 I assume moving around on foot was pretty difficult for them though, what with the weaker gravity and stiffness of those big bulky spacesuits. At least the buggy mitigated that issue.
@@gower1973 Not likely with two excellent reference points available, the sun and the earth.
Plz! Upscale METROPOLIS!. And now is copyright free!.
There's already a HD transfers out there. You could interpolate it though
@ECHO-IA2 行列ガーリー120 Hz Thats rite!
Yes, PLEASE! Apparently they also found some long lost footage a few years back.
Some machine learning upscaling
Apparantly the metropolis film was made in an previous era of humanity, the stories of it being made in 1929 are just that, stories.
What a fantastic restoration to a 50 year film. Kudos to whomever done this
Driving on the fucking moon, how did the public back then got bored of this?
Absolutely incredible, can you imagine the Apollo film that could be made if this was done to all the footage, unreal!
There isn't that much that was shot on film. The film reels were fairly short. The Apollo 11 EVA shot from the LM was set to one frame per second to allow for a longer film.
Most of the videos from Apollo that you see are shot on video so don't look nearly as good as the ones shot on film.
It's incredible how much fun he's having lol
I would prefer if you didn't add music and it was just the original audio.
LOL. Good one.
@@mada1241 ?
The music makes it almost unwatchable.
Why does every video maker feel that there must be music under everything? Original audio is much more interesting.
Tape damaged I'm pretty sure is when the astronauts said something like
'Holy fucking shit dude we're driving a go kart on the fucking moon'
I watched much of this live in black and white when I was a kid. Still amazing to watch today!
ok boomer
Anyone fakers noticed that the gravity is SLOW here? 😂 The dust is settling far slower than expected on earth 🌍. So either they really were on the moon or just tuned down the gravity in that studio!
That, and it doesn't linger in the air as dust does on Earth... Because there's no air to linger in, since the Moon lacks an atmosphere.
@@NoelistAvenger or slow down the tape
Looking at this make me realize how crazy this must have felt......to be the first human or living being in general, to stand on this moon. The first time to stand on solid ground, while also not standing on earth.
"Okay Max stop!" .. "Ok I don't wanna do that" .. "Okay excuse me" lol
I watched them land on the moon in 1969 when I was eleven yrs. old on my grandma's tv live with the rest of the world, never forget it. Saw JFK get assinated on live tv when I was 5 yrs. old on the same tv. Sad.
Who came here to read the comments?
Those pitch black shadows (due to lack of atmosphere) fascinate me every time I see a footage of moon.
Being able to watch this historical tape with such quality really astonishes me.
Moon looks like a desert
Thank you for doing this. It’s incredible.
Amazing your work on upscaling these videos. Good job
Excellent, the stabilization made this the best example of Apollo footage I've seen. The landscape was the clearest I've ever seen it! Thanks!!
all i saw previously was a pixelated retro video, which i also had uploaded to one of my Docu channels. but your video is just on another level, this is stunning work and amazing piece of history on so many levels. THANK YOU lol, guys appreciate this !!!
"Wanna turn around John?" Charlie Duke thinking, "Please don't hit the freaking Command Module."
You can request next video for an upscale in this thread ✨
Apollo 11
Hindenburg
"modern time "
"voyage sur la lune" Georges Méliés
Жду апскейл картинок на DTF
Bealtifull! Awsome! Incredible! I was out of breath 😱 It is interesting how it shows in detail, 4k and 60fps, the man in -Area 51- Moon🌜
I didn't know they had music on the moon
It's blackspeech. From the same artist that played the universe.
Well, firstly, how come do you figure out that is on the moon but not just in the desert in the moonlight?
You don't know alot about the moon
@@anastasiakudrina9150 You can figure that out on it's own by the fact that we see no stars or blue colours in the sky despite there being absolutely no light pollution in a desert.
@@anastasiakudrina9150 weaker gravity
Look closely at the regolith pulled up by the rear tires of the lunar rover and you will see the 'fanning' or 'feathering' effect that could only occur in a low gravity environment like the lunar surface. Pretty cool!
Look at how the texture of the ground immediately changes from detailed in the fore, to fuzzy (low resolution) in the background.
Millions years of evolution;
Tens of tousands of men involved;
The most incredible acheivement in human history;
The rise of AI technologie;
And after all that, all the sacrifices, all the time spend, all the efforts done...
TH-cam randomly shift the vid to 144 for no god damn reason.
Evolution.
It's fascinating how quickly the dust falls back to the ground in the vacuum.
Lol
@@ph.d.r3334 So...dust falling quickly in a vacuum because there's no air resistance is...funny?
@@blue3media I thought it should fall like in slow motion
@@blue3media Gravity on the Moon is 6 times lower, so yeah, it's funny to see how they try to pass it off as real Moon, not some Airforce depressurized dome on Earth.
Okey Dokey.
The logistics involved in getting the rover from Earth to the moon is something I can’t fathom but it’s a true sign of ingenuity!
Как было бы прекрасно, если Луна бы была второй Землёй. Смотрели бы друг-друга в телескоп, летали бы туда-сюда кто имеет деньги.
This is amazing ! Thanks a million 🙏🏻👍🏻
I was today years old when I found out that humans drove a car on the moon. Why don't people talk about this much?
Спасибо за качественную обработку. Теперь вообще хорошо видно, что там сидит кукла с неподвижной и неестественно застывшей левой рукой:)
У таксистов точно так же бывает, выствит локоть в окошко и ездит! И не шевелит!
Amazing how you've interpolated so much information from the original footage, Denis. Felt really immersive.
I have no words... just thanks!
Beautiful. I'm so upset that so much original footage was overwritten.
I hope we get to see the next moon/Mars landing soon. We should really be working toward it harder as a species.
Martin C
NO original footage was overwritten. LEarn something.
@@tqnohe Was it even magnetic tape that could be over written? I thought it was good old celluloid. Can't overwrite that.
@Some One Film? The footage I'm talking about was recieved via radio signals and recorded onto analog magnetic data tapes. The magnetic tapes can be degaussed and magnetically reset to be reused.
@@curicmc The only think over written was the slow scan (10 frame per second) black and white video from Apollo 11. But nothing was lost since all of it was recorded after being converted to standard NTSC for broadcast.
The video shown here was shot on 16 mm color film.
Great work! Thank you. Love how chill John Young is and also the contrasting enthusiasm of Charle's Duke.
FYI, during the launch of their Saturn V, Young's heart rate was at a steady 70bpm. Charles Duke's was 144bpm.
Why you know things? Embrace the void and infinte nothingness. Be still. Quiet. It's best.
Young must've had nerves of steel; if I was sitting on top of a giant missile about to be shot into space, I certainly wouldn't feel very calm !
Almost as if they're in a comfortable safe sound recording studio.
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 If your heartbeat reaches 145bpm in a "comfortable safe sound recording studio", you'd better go see a cardiologist.
Your channel is truly incredible, Denis.
you're onto something with these improved videos! don't stop...more plz :)
Keep this content coming!!!!
2:43 Посмотрел в конце сравнение с оригиналом, думал там шакалы будут, а они 40 лет назад сняли лучше, чем сейчас некоторые снимают.
А вообще молодцы, J-mission это конечно важно, но покатушки на вездеходе никто не отменял)
Хасселблад норм камеры, че сказать)
40 лет назад?
Ну так это миссия стоила огромных денек, поэтому и сняли хорошо
@Zephir2000 Надо ещё раз слетать, срочно в 8к переснять :)
guy on comms: make a sharp turn!!
john: i have no desire to make a sharp turn
lmao this is amazing
So well edited. Thank you
Эх... сейчас бы сесть в свою космическую девятку, включить M83 на полную и проехаться по родным необъятным просторам Луны...
Или Кавинского )
Автомобили портят экологию! Нужен лунный велосипед!
Хмм, почему не догадались велосипед на луну взять?
В Космича надо садиться, в космича!
@@Delv.Kosigan надо тогда горный брать
@@Delv.Kosigan правильно! Нечего лунный вакуум выхлопами загрязнять, там и так уже дышать нечем)
Damn, the new Space Engineers update looks so cool! Nice work Keen!
This channel is cool as hell man
It was an electric car with an electric motor in each wheel ! 🤯
Dust lolzzzzzzz NASA is fake
This is your daily dose of Recommendation
Apollo mission footage upscaled Interpolated
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I thought you should be able to see up to 100km in the horizon easily while standing on the surface of the moon. But here it looks like the horizon is only 500m away, unless they are on a flat area on top of a mountain on the moon, that would make sense.
Moon horizon is something like 2500 meters assuming flat ground. Also there is no atmospheric haze so this is almost impossible to distinct between small hill from 500 meters and large mountain from 10 km.
@@kebab1865 the moon isn't that small, I'm sure you could see up to 100km into the horizon. But as you said, there is no haze so we may not see the difference unlike here on earth.
@@RIFIANBOY Actually you will see just the tip of 3-km high mountain at 100 km from you on the moon. If you place view point on 1.7 meter above the ground horizon range will be 2.4 km for Moon or 4.6 km for Earth.
www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/EL/calculator/radio-line-of-sight/
Imagine the fact that due to atmosphere on earth looking at the horizon we are actually seeing objects that are already below the curvature of the earth, this is called mirage I dont know about how much distance beyond the curvature we can observe, but that could be additional ~10 or maybe more kilometers, I am pretty sure that if you are interested there should be information available :)
Another thing to notice is that due to lack of reference points on the moon landscape, it is actually pretty hard to distinguish which object is further away in this video. If you notice the moon rover looks quite big compared to the landing craft they used t land on the moon, it is really hard to understand distances correctly in this video.
@@S3l3ct1ve Thank you for the info. Let's hope they give us more insight next time they go to the moon (in 2024 maybe). With current 3D scanning technology we can get a virtual copy of a very large area and analyze it.
Love these old films being upscaled! Imagine if we had the technology we have today back then...
This is incredible! My congratulations for such a beautiful job!
so you become 4K upscaler channel 👌
with 4K Subs right now
*a m a z i n g*
Driving around in the moon must be so fucking dope
Estupendo trabajo Denis. Gracias!...
can you do WW2 footage upscale?
And name a good reason for that? Just one?
@@agerven Curiosity
@@IntelTV Curiosity can be satisfied by the huge amount of footage available (which i confirm should be preserved in some digital form, although most already is).
agerven What would be a reason NOT to? Im curious.
@@smith507 Anything WWS2 related It's the content what matters, as long as its a good recording of audio and video. I'd directly go for an autited improvement in case audio was inaudible or incomprehensible.
it looks like they can fall off the edge the blackness is spooky as hell
*I like the ambient music. Song name?* 🙂
I'm glad Alan Watts got to see humanity go to the moon before he passed away in 1972
There were folks driving around on the moon on the day I was born. My mind just made a backflip.
Notice that the dirt falls to the ground within a few seconds. That means this was filmed in an environment without an atmosphere (the moon). And if you speed it up to match what we think of as normal speed it's even more obvious.
yes, intelligent people know this. Also, the puppet on the remote vehicle never moves its hands or head.
@@rickparker679 Plenty of video showing astronauts moving around with the dirt doing the same thing.
Rick Parker tell me genius why would they use puppet not real human in that suit?
@@tgstudio85 He seems to be insinuating that the moon missions were fake and that this moon buggy is just a remote control car in a vacuum with a puppet at the wheel. Or he's just a troll.
@@tgstudio85 The entire scene was staged , using miniature remote vehicle and a "doll" fastened to the driver seat to look real. It failed. But cost millions.
how the F u get all this old ass videos man btw i like them man they some kind of chilling and knowing how the early lifestyle was is awesome thx for the uploads.
спасибо за отличное видео, искал старый футаж который удалили с ютуба, а теперь он мне рекомендует это видео - чудеса.
Technically he's not even off road since roads only exist in earth.
What a nice film set it was...
WOW! Simply amazing fantastic cosmic colors!
Amazing job!! Loved it! 👏
I just found your channel, and I feel like I have to tell you that this gave me chills and that I'm crying from amazement. It was so clear. The view point, camera and resolution are all so perfect to where I felt like you could bend down and pick up a rock. I never knew it was so totally dusty and sandy. I know it's silly, but if you had water you could probably build a sand castle on the moon. Just imagine being there. In all my 22 years, I've never saw a POV video of the moon. Really if we wipe away all our cultural notions, its quite ugly land, gray and almost nothing but dirt, not even rocky land. But it's so beautiful how it's a dead massive rock floating around our planet. That we worked hard enough and got enough money to send regular but smart people to this massive orb in our sky. That every foot print will always be there. That all those prints the moon buggy made in '72 are still there.
I like how all the people who think this fake act like they are trained physicists. It is a compliment to the scientists and engineers responsible to suggest it is unbelievable. Even their ultimate rivals, the Soviets, never uttered the word 'fake'.
And you think it's true because you were told so?
If it were possible to send a man on the Moon back then, we would've had at least biyearly Moon Missions by now. Which we don't, and before Musk, US couldn't even make a rocket engine to launch its own satellites on Earth's orbit. Which is pretty much damning evidence that Apollo is one big fat hoax.
@@Inieel the reason the US stopped landing can be quite easily explained when you look at the complicated politics of the time. Which lead to reduced funding of NASA, so after the last moon landing in 72 NASA started doing longer term research missions around the solar system (First notable one was Pioneer 10
1973 flyby of
Jupiter and moons then Voyager 1&2 a few years later and New Horizons and others etc) they moved to missions more for scientist then for the public. As public interest simmered off.
@@Inieel yeah, the facts are rigid things, hard to unsee them, but you succeeded.
@@Inieel oooh god, you think those rockets and missions are soo cheap?? even the suviets had problems spending all the money on the space race and many businussmen who were told to give money did everything in their power to stop the goverment do it. and by the way you are also have been told by others to think so, so its not your research and own ideas!! you have been brainwashed and manipulated like any other guy who want think for his self?
Zlyab And you think that’s true because you were told so?
I don't get how people can say that this footage "looks fake" when the way the dust behaves (falling back down immediately instead of staying up in the air) would only be possible in a place where there's no air at all... Such as the Moon.
Or maybe under water?
People don't say that the footage is fake, they say that it wasn't filmed on The Moon.
Take some heavy-particle dust (like powdered iron or rust) and see how it behaves in Earth's atmosphere. It'll settle down even faster than the one on the video.
BUT.
The thing is - it shouldn't fall down faster than on Earth in the first place. It should stay airborne LONGER than on Earth, and it has nothing to do with air pressure, but with gravity.
Moon's gravity is 17% of that on Earth. So if you take a ball of lead and drop it from 10 feet on Earth and on Moon, it will take 2,5 times longer to fall on the Moon. That's because S=a*t^2 formula, which nixes the difference pretty hard.
But 17% comes into full play when it comes to negating inertia of upward-bound objects, like dust that's being thrown from under rover's wheels. It takes SIX TIMES as long for dust to start falling down on Moon than on Earth. So the wheels should produce veritable fountains of dust riding with such speed.
When we compare fountains, we can pretty much ignore the atmosphere factor. While it helps particles stay afloat longer, it also hampers upward movement; thus, for fountain's longevity, it can pretty much be ignored.
@Mark Aim They didn't "lose" the tech as in "whoops, we don't know where the blueprints are, bummer !", it's lost because it's outdated. Seriously, it's already been explained several times; it's 70's tech we're talking about, what would be the point of building a 70's rocket today instead of starting from scratch to develop something safer, more advanced and adapted to today's standards ?
Those guys explained it better : www.quora.com/How-is-it-that-NASA-lost-the-technology-to-go-to-the-moon-It-blew-my-mind-when-NASA-said-this
@@Inieel
The dust is going up real high to me.
Awesome sauce!!!! Thanks much for posting!!! :) :) :) :)
Yo man, can you upscale my life?
Thank you keep up the marvelous work!
Your videos are fascinating, I'd love to see an old London upscaled, that would be fantastic.
It's hard to imagine that the coldness there is near to absolute zero lol
one would think by 2020, we would have 120fps of bustling Moon activity on broadcast, internet down below a thriving city of flying cars and people and business with the assistive robots cleaning our streets and keeping us safe from crime and illegal activities(which can definitely create problems of its own) but no... there isn't much going on in the world of today except someone like channel helping us feel and hope for a bright 60fps future.
Religious conservatism killed that pretty quickly. They don't like progress.
US 60s technology at the best generation, piece of cake to drive on moon.
Cool channel you have here, Denis. I just subscribed. 👍
Это фантастика, спасибо)
а что за спиной?
Здорово видно, как реголит с колес сыпется при малом движении и когда ускоряется выбрасывает в луносферу:)
I love Kubrick films!!
magic10rm
Me too. SO why did you bring that up? Seems kind of random.
@@tqnohe It's an old joke. _When NASA realized they couldn't land on the moon, they hired Stanley Kubrick to film a fake moon mission. Unfortunately for them, Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he insisted they film on location._
Laughing Gravy
I know the joke. And the BS moon landing deniers’ claims.
The the very fact that Neil Armstrong apparently flubbed his big line show it wasn’t Kubrick. That guy would have done 50 takes to get it right.
I am Armstrong. No l am Armstrong. No I am Armstrong...........etc. .
@@tqnohe That's a very good point actually, I'll make sure to remember that whenever I see another one of those "fake dis wuz filmd by stenly rubik!!1" guys.
It’s crazy to watch your New York video and then this, and realize it was only 60years later. Horse Drawn carriages to driving on the Moon.
Fake! Were are the stars????!
Just kidding. Awesome!!!!
Nice work! Thankyu!
In 1970s people were walking on the Moon and flying on supersonic planes. Was it future?
The most expensive kart racing in history.
Nothing improves an important piece of history like a stupid soundtrack.
Nicely done.
Drop the music track! (Why do people keep adding those? The air/ground loop is sufficient unto itself.)