It's funny how people are making this awesome remasterizations of historical videos while there are others on Instagram making they high quality 4K perfect focused and stabilized videos look like old vintage crappy clips by adding filters. People are weird.
There isn't that much that was shot on film. The film reels were fairly short. The Apollo 11 EVA shot from the LM was set to one frame per second to allow for a longer film. Most of the videos from Apollo that you see are shot on video so don't look nearly as good as the ones shot on film.
It DID get everywhere. It's fine and sticky and clung to their space suits. They had to brush it off before climbing back into the LM, but they never managed to get rid of much of it. A real mess.
One would think with the lack of gravity the space dust cloud would become massive and blur out the entire surrounding area but instead it gently splashes back down around the wheels almost like earth gravity in slow motion ... but what do i know ...
Yeh it folded up like a little meccano car and the wheels where wire wound, I think it was great engineering feat but ultimately pointless more of a marketing gimmick for tv at the time. The astronauts where never going to go out of sight of the lander as they could of got easily gotten lost on a featureless landscape.
@@gower1973 I assume moving around on foot was pretty difficult for them though, what with the weaker gravity and stiffness of those big bulky spacesuits. At least the buggy mitigated that issue.
Looking at this make me realize how crazy this must have felt......to be the first human or living being in general, to stand on this moon. The first time to stand on solid ground, while also not standing on earth.
all i saw previously was a pixelated retro video, which i also had uploaded to one of my Docu channels. but your video is just on another level, this is stunning work and amazing piece of history on so many levels. THANK YOU lol, guys appreciate this !!!
I watched them land on the moon in 1969 when I was eleven yrs. old on my grandma's tv live with the rest of the world, never forget it. Saw JFK get assinated on live tv when I was 5 yrs. old on the same tv. Sad.
@@IntelTV Curiosity can be satisfied by the huge amount of footage available (which i confirm should be preserved in some digital form, although most already is).
@@smith507 Anything WWS2 related It's the content what matters, as long as its a good recording of audio and video. I'd directly go for an autited improvement in case audio was inaudible or incomprehensible.
2:43 Посмотрел в конце сравнение с оригиналом, думал там шакалы будут, а они 40 лет назад сняли лучше, чем сейчас некоторые снимают. А вообще молодцы, J-mission это конечно важно, но покатушки на вездеходе никто не отменял)
Great work! Thank you. Love how chill John Young is and also the contrasting enthusiasm of Charle's Duke. FYI, during the launch of their Saturn V, Young's heart rate was at a steady 70bpm. Charles Duke's was 144bpm.
@@anastasiakudrina9150 You can figure that out on it's own by the fact that we see no stars or blue colours in the sky despite there being absolutely no light pollution in a desert.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I thought you should be able to see up to 100km in the horizon easily while standing on the surface of the moon. But here it looks like the horizon is only 500m away, unless they are on a flat area on top of a mountain on the moon, that would make sense.
Moon horizon is something like 2500 meters assuming flat ground. Also there is no atmospheric haze so this is almost impossible to distinct between small hill from 500 meters and large mountain from 10 km.
@@kebab1865 the moon isn't that small, I'm sure you could see up to 100km into the horizon. But as you said, there is no haze so we may not see the difference unlike here on earth.
@@RIFIANBOY Actually you will see just the tip of 3-km high mountain at 100 km from you on the moon. If you place view point on 1.7 meter above the ground horizon range will be 2.4 km for Moon or 4.6 km for Earth. www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/EL/calculator/radio-line-of-sight/
Imagine the fact that due to atmosphere on earth looking at the horizon we are actually seeing objects that are already below the curvature of the earth, this is called mirage I dont know about how much distance beyond the curvature we can observe, but that could be additional ~10 or maybe more kilometers, I am pretty sure that if you are interested there should be information available :) Another thing to notice is that due to lack of reference points on the moon landscape, it is actually pretty hard to distinguish which object is further away in this video. If you notice the moon rover looks quite big compared to the landing craft they used t land on the moon, it is really hard to understand distances correctly in this video.
@@S3l3ct1ve Thank you for the info. Let's hope they give us more insight next time they go to the moon (in 2024 maybe). With current 3D scanning technology we can get a virtual copy of a very large area and analyze it.
Look closely at the regolith pulled up by the rear tires of the lunar rover and you will see the 'fanning' or 'feathering' effect that could only occur in a low gravity environment like the lunar surface. Pretty cool!
Anyone fakers noticed that the gravity is SLOW here? 😂 The dust is settling far slower than expected on earth 🌍. So either they really were on the moon or just tuned down the gravity in that studio!
Beautiful. I'm so upset that so much original footage was overwritten. I hope we get to see the next moon/Mars landing soon. We should really be working toward it harder as a species.
@Some One Film? The footage I'm talking about was recieved via radio signals and recorded onto analog magnetic data tapes. The magnetic tapes can be degaussed and magnetically reset to be reused.
@@curicmc The only think over written was the slow scan (10 frame per second) black and white video from Apollo 11. But nothing was lost since all of it was recorded after being converted to standard NTSC for broadcast. The video shown here was shot on 16 mm color film.
@@blue3media Gravity on the Moon is 6 times lower, so yeah, it's funny to see how they try to pass it off as real Moon, not some Airforce depressurized dome on Earth.
I just found your channel, and I feel like I have to tell you that this gave me chills and that I'm crying from amazement. It was so clear. The view point, camera and resolution are all so perfect to where I felt like you could bend down and pick up a rock. I never knew it was so totally dusty and sandy. I know it's silly, but if you had water you could probably build a sand castle on the moon. Just imagine being there. In all my 22 years, I've never saw a POV video of the moon. Really if we wipe away all our cultural notions, its quite ugly land, gray and almost nothing but dirt, not even rocky land. But it's so beautiful how it's a dead massive rock floating around our planet. That we worked hard enough and got enough money to send regular but smart people to this massive orb in our sky. That every foot print will always be there. That all those prints the moon buggy made in '72 are still there.
Millions years of evolution; Tens of tousands of men involved; The most incredible acheivement in human history; The rise of AI technologie; And after all that, all the sacrifices, all the time spend, all the efforts done... TH-cam randomly shift the vid to 144 for no god damn reason. Evolution.
how the F u get all this old ass videos man btw i like them man they some kind of chilling and knowing how the early lifestyle was is awesome thx for the uploads.
How much footage does there exist where we could see an astronaut , who would be driving a buggy on the moon in large area, and where we would see him actually give any signs of being alive?
at around 2:00 is approaching the lunar module at that speed and risk hitting it and never coming back to Earth? If I had been an astronaut on the Moon, I would never have taken such a risk!
Without atmospheric haze or any familiar objects to give you a point of reference for scale, distant objects appear closer than your human brain, which has evolved to estimate distance on earth, can discern.
@@nakekygt954 Dude, he wasn't going to hit it. And even if he did, he would have damaged the descent stage, so it wouldn't really matter. Come on, these people were not retards. They trained for this for days.
I don't get how people can say that this footage "looks fake" when the way the dust behaves (falling back down immediately instead of staying up in the air) would only be possible in a place where there's no air at all... Such as the Moon.
Take some heavy-particle dust (like powdered iron or rust) and see how it behaves in Earth's atmosphere. It'll settle down even faster than the one on the video. BUT. The thing is - it shouldn't fall down faster than on Earth in the first place. It should stay airborne LONGER than on Earth, and it has nothing to do with air pressure, but with gravity. Moon's gravity is 17% of that on Earth. So if you take a ball of lead and drop it from 10 feet on Earth and on Moon, it will take 2,5 times longer to fall on the Moon. That's because S=a*t^2 formula, which nixes the difference pretty hard. But 17% comes into full play when it comes to negating inertia of upward-bound objects, like dust that's being thrown from under rover's wheels. It takes SIX TIMES as long for dust to start falling down on Moon than on Earth. So the wheels should produce veritable fountains of dust riding with such speed. When we compare fountains, we can pretty much ignore the atmosphere factor. While it helps particles stay afloat longer, it also hampers upward movement; thus, for fountain's longevity, it can pretty much be ignored.
@Mark Aim They didn't "lose" the tech as in "whoops, we don't know where the blueprints are, bummer !", it's lost because it's outdated. Seriously, it's already been explained several times; it's 70's tech we're talking about, what would be the point of building a 70's rocket today instead of starting from scratch to develop something safer, more advanced and adapted to today's standards ? Those guys explained it better : www.quora.com/How-is-it-that-NASA-lost-the-technology-to-go-to-the-moon-It-blew-my-mind-when-NASA-said-this
@@tqnohe It's an old joke. _When NASA realized they couldn't land on the moon, they hired Stanley Kubrick to film a fake moon mission. Unfortunately for them, Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he insisted they film on location._
Laughing Gravy I know the joke. And the BS moon landing deniers’ claims. The the very fact that Neil Armstrong apparently flubbed his big line show it wasn’t Kubrick. That guy would have done 50 takes to get it right.
@@tqnohe That's a very good point actually, I'll make sure to remember that whenever I see another one of those "fake dis wuz filmd by stenly rubik!!1" guys.
1911 to 1972 Is all the time it took to go from people still traveling by carriage to landing on the moon. That’s just 1 life span
The damaged parts of the tape are when the aliens ran in front of the camera.
i think it's was
flies
I would imagine it's for something they didn't want us to see, props, a bird, a plane etc
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 direct evidence this shit is a bunch of bologna
/s
It wasnt tape. Film
@@Carl_Aznable disagree
in 3-4 years we will see this again in 4K live-streamed from the moon
2020: *turning old footage in 60 fps 4K*
2200: *turning modern footage into a fully interactive hologram*
Paying billion of dollars to play Mario kart on the moon. Thats what i call a job
"Ok max stop!"
"Ok I dont wanna do that."
"Ok excuse me."
I would a been like, “Yo man it’s my turn now!”
Now is time for some JFK footage
CIA did it. He didnt want to run wars for money.
Jacek M CIA covered it up, they hired mob hit men
JFK? How about some Eisenhower footage. The guy that created the space program.
back and to the left.
9/11? Would be cool to upscale the only known footage of the first plane hitting.
Plz! Upscale METROPOLIS!. And now is copyright free!.
There's already a HD transfers out there. You could interpolate it though
@ECHO-IA2 行列ガーリー120 Hz Thats rite!
Yes, PLEASE! Apparently they also found some long lost footage a few years back.
Some machine learning upscaling
Apparantly the metropolis film was made in an previous era of humanity, the stories of it being made in 1929 are just that, stories.
How did they fit the buggy onto the capsule?
It's funny how people are making this awesome remasterizations of historical videos while there are others on Instagram making they high quality 4K perfect focused and stabilized videos look like old vintage crappy clips by adding filters. People are weird.
The human race, first time landing on something that isn't earth... rips skids in a space car.
5th time landing.
1st time? Lol
Its fake bro
@@ChuckBeefOG You're a fake bro
I'm pretty sure the first thing they did was draw a penis on the moon's surface but it wasn't filmed. I mean, I would.
It's incredible how much fun he's having lol
Absolutely incredible, can you imagine the Apollo film that could be made if this was done to all the footage, unreal!
There isn't that much that was shot on film. The film reels were fairly short. The Apollo 11 EVA shot from the LM was set to one frame per second to allow for a longer film.
Most of the videos from Apollo that you see are shot on video so don't look nearly as good as the ones shot on film.
I would prefer if you didn't add music and it was just the original audio.
LOL. Good one.
@@mada1241 ?
The music makes it almost unwatchable.
Why does every video maker feel that there must be music under everything? Original audio is much more interesting.
What a fantastic restoration to a 50 year film. Kudos to whomever done this
Thank you for doing this. It’s incredible.
I watched much of this live in black and white when I was a kid. Still amazing to watch today!
ok boomer
That moon dust is so fine. I imagine it would get everywhere and ruin all modern electronics.
It DID get everywhere. It's fine and sticky and clung to their space suits. They had to brush it off before climbing back into the LM, but they never managed to get rid of much of it. A real mess.
@@MrWhipple42 Also inhaled it after coming back inside and some of them got a lunar "fever". Not good for the lungs.
@@GoldenPrune *I understood that reference*
One would think with the lack of gravity the space dust cloud would become massive and blur out the entire surrounding area but instead it gently splashes back down around the wheels almost like earth gravity in slow motion ... but what do i know ...
@@moonwvlf6919 They're on the Moon, you dolt. There is gravity, roughly 1/6th that of Earth's... But what do I know?
Tape damaged I'm pretty sure is when the astronauts said something like
'Holy fucking shit dude we're driving a go kart on the fucking moon'
Amazing how they all managed to fit in with the car in the tiny lander.
It folded up. www.collectspace.com//review/ap15-S71-31409.jpg
Yeh it folded up like a little meccano car and the wheels where wire wound, I think it was great engineering feat but ultimately pointless more of a marketing gimmick for tv at the time. The astronauts where never going to go out of sight of the lander as they could of got easily gotten lost on a featureless landscape.
@@gower1973 I assume moving around on foot was pretty difficult for them though, what with the weaker gravity and stiffness of those big bulky spacesuits. At least the buggy mitigated that issue.
@@gower1973 Not likely with two excellent reference points available, the sun and the earth.
"Okay Max stop!" .. "Ok I don't wanna do that" .. "Okay excuse me" lol
Amazing your work on upscaling these videos. Good job
Looking at this make me realize how crazy this must have felt......to be the first human or living being in general, to stand on this moon. The first time to stand on solid ground, while also not standing on earth.
all i saw previously was a pixelated retro video, which i also had uploaded to one of my Docu channels. but your video is just on another level, this is stunning work and amazing piece of history on so many levels. THANK YOU lol, guys appreciate this !!!
Who came here to read the comments?
Excellent, the stabilization made this the best example of Apollo footage I've seen. The landscape was the clearest I've ever seen it! Thanks!!
You can request next video for an upscale in this thread ✨
Apollo 11
Hindenburg
"modern time "
"voyage sur la lune" Georges Méliés
Жду апскейл картинок на DTF
I have no words... just thanks!
"Wanna turn around John?" Charlie Duke thinking, "Please don't hit the freaking Command Module."
Amazing how you've interpolated so much information from the original footage, Denis. Felt really immersive.
This is amazing ! Thanks a million 🙏🏻👍🏻
So well edited. Thank you
Keep this content coming!!!!
*I like the ambient music. Song name?* 🙂
I watched them land on the moon in 1969 when I was eleven yrs. old on my grandma's tv live with the rest of the world, never forget it. Saw JFK get assinated on live tv when I was 5 yrs. old on the same tv. Sad.
Moon looks like a desert
Your channel is truly incredible, Denis.
Estupendo trabajo Denis. Gracias!...
Those pitch black shadows (due to lack of atmosphere) fascinate me every time I see a footage of moon.
can you do WW2 footage upscale?
And name a good reason for that? Just one?
@@agerven Curiosity
@@IntelTV Curiosity can be satisfied by the huge amount of footage available (which i confirm should be preserved in some digital form, although most already is).
agerven What would be a reason NOT to? Im curious.
@@smith507 Anything WWS2 related It's the content what matters, as long as its a good recording of audio and video. I'd directly go for an autited improvement in case audio was inaudible or incomprehensible.
Being able to watch this historical tape with such quality really astonishes me.
2:43 Посмотрел в конце сравнение с оригиналом, думал там шакалы будут, а они 40 лет назад сняли лучше, чем сейчас некоторые снимают.
А вообще молодцы, J-mission это конечно важно, но покатушки на вездеходе никто не отменял)
Хасселблад норм камеры, че сказать)
40 лет назад?
Ну так это миссия стоила огромных денек, поэтому и сняли хорошо
@Zephir2000 Надо ещё раз слетать, срочно в 8к переснять :)
Спасибо за качественную обработку. Теперь вообще хорошо видно, что там сидит кукла с неподвижной и неестественно застывшей левой рукой:)
У таксистов точно так же бывает, выствит локоть в окошко и ездит! И не шевелит!
Great work! Thank you. Love how chill John Young is and also the contrasting enthusiasm of Charle's Duke.
FYI, during the launch of their Saturn V, Young's heart rate was at a steady 70bpm. Charles Duke's was 144bpm.
Why you know things? Embrace the void and infinte nothingness. Be still. Quiet. It's best.
Young must've had nerves of steel; if I was sitting on top of a giant missile about to be shot into space, I certainly wouldn't feel very calm !
Almost as if they're in a comfortable safe sound recording studio.
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 If your heartbeat reaches 145bpm in a "comfortable safe sound recording studio", you'd better go see a cardiologist.
guy on comms: make a sharp turn!!
john: i have no desire to make a sharp turn
lmao this is amazing
I didn't know they had music on the moon
It's blackspeech. From the same artist that played the universe.
Well, firstly, how come do you figure out that is on the moon but not just in the desert in the moonlight?
You don't know alot about the moon
@@anastasiakudrina9150 You can figure that out on it's own by the fact that we see no stars or blue colours in the sky despite there being absolutely no light pollution in a desert.
@@anastasiakudrina9150 weaker gravity
you're onto something with these improved videos! don't stop...more plz :)
Thank you keep up the marvelous work!
Bealtifull! Awsome! Incredible! I was out of breath 😱 It is interesting how it shows in detail, 4k and 60fps, the man in -Area 51- Moon🌜
This channel is cool as hell man
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I thought you should be able to see up to 100km in the horizon easily while standing on the surface of the moon. But here it looks like the horizon is only 500m away, unless they are on a flat area on top of a mountain on the moon, that would make sense.
Moon horizon is something like 2500 meters assuming flat ground. Also there is no atmospheric haze so this is almost impossible to distinct between small hill from 500 meters and large mountain from 10 km.
@@kebab1865 the moon isn't that small, I'm sure you could see up to 100km into the horizon. But as you said, there is no haze so we may not see the difference unlike here on earth.
@@RIFIANBOY Actually you will see just the tip of 3-km high mountain at 100 km from you on the moon. If you place view point on 1.7 meter above the ground horizon range will be 2.4 km for Moon or 4.6 km for Earth.
www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/EL/calculator/radio-line-of-sight/
Imagine the fact that due to atmosphere on earth looking at the horizon we are actually seeing objects that are already below the curvature of the earth, this is called mirage I dont know about how much distance beyond the curvature we can observe, but that could be additional ~10 or maybe more kilometers, I am pretty sure that if you are interested there should be information available :)
Another thing to notice is that due to lack of reference points on the moon landscape, it is actually pretty hard to distinguish which object is further away in this video. If you notice the moon rover looks quite big compared to the landing craft they used t land on the moon, it is really hard to understand distances correctly in this video.
@@S3l3ct1ve Thank you for the info. Let's hope they give us more insight next time they go to the moon (in 2024 maybe). With current 3D scanning technology we can get a virtual copy of a very large area and analyze it.
Amazing job!! Loved it! 👏
The logistics involved in getting the rover from Earth to the moon is something I can’t fathom but it’s a true sign of ingenuity!
Damn, the new Space Engineers update looks so cool! Nice work Keen!
This is incredible! My congratulations for such a beautiful job!
WOW! Simply amazing fantastic cosmic colors!
Look closely at the regolith pulled up by the rear tires of the lunar rover and you will see the 'fanning' or 'feathering' effect that could only occur in a low gravity environment like the lunar surface. Pretty cool!
Anyone fakers noticed that the gravity is SLOW here? 😂 The dust is settling far slower than expected on earth 🌍. So either they really were on the moon or just tuned down the gravity in that studio!
That, and it doesn't linger in the air as dust does on Earth... Because there's no air to linger in, since the Moon lacks an atmosphere.
@@NoelistAvenger or slow down the tape
There were folks driving around on the moon on the day I was born. My mind just made a backflip.
спасибо за отличное видео, искал старый футаж который удалили с ютуба, а теперь он мне рекомендует это видео - чудеса.
Beautiful. I'm so upset that so much original footage was overwritten.
I hope we get to see the next moon/Mars landing soon. We should really be working toward it harder as a species.
Martin C
NO original footage was overwritten. LEarn something.
@@tqnohe Was it even magnetic tape that could be over written? I thought it was good old celluloid. Can't overwrite that.
@Some One Film? The footage I'm talking about was recieved via radio signals and recorded onto analog magnetic data tapes. The magnetic tapes can be degaussed and magnetically reset to be reused.
@@curicmc The only think over written was the slow scan (10 frame per second) black and white video from Apollo 11. But nothing was lost since all of it was recorded after being converted to standard NTSC for broadcast.
The video shown here was shot on 16 mm color film.
Awesome sauce!!!! Thanks much for posting!!! :) :) :) :)
It's fascinating how quickly the dust falls back to the ground in the vacuum.
Lol
@@ph.d.r3334 So...dust falling quickly in a vacuum because there's no air resistance is...funny?
@@blue3media I thought it should fall like in slow motion
@@blue3media Gravity on the Moon is 6 times lower, so yeah, it's funny to see how they try to pass it off as real Moon, not some Airforce depressurized dome on Earth.
Okey Dokey.
Эх... сейчас бы сесть в свою космическую девятку, включить M83 на полную и проехаться по родным необъятным просторам Луны...
Или Кавинского )
Автомобили портят экологию! Нужен лунный велосипед!
Хмм, почему не догадались велосипед на луну взять?
В Космича надо садиться, в космича!
@@Delv.Kosigan надо тогда горный брать
@@Delv.Kosigan правильно! Нечего лунный вакуум выхлопами загрязнять, там и так уже дышать нечем)
I was today years old when I found out that humans drove a car on the moon. Why don't people talk about this much?
This is your daily dose of Recommendation
Apollo mission footage upscaled Interpolated
I just found your channel, and I feel like I have to tell you that this gave me chills and that I'm crying from amazement. It was so clear. The view point, camera and resolution are all so perfect to where I felt like you could bend down and pick up a rock. I never knew it was so totally dusty and sandy. I know it's silly, but if you had water you could probably build a sand castle on the moon. Just imagine being there. In all my 22 years, I've never saw a POV video of the moon. Really if we wipe away all our cultural notions, its quite ugly land, gray and almost nothing but dirt, not even rocky land. But it's so beautiful how it's a dead massive rock floating around our planet. That we worked hard enough and got enough money to send regular but smart people to this massive orb in our sky. That every foot print will always be there. That all those prints the moon buggy made in '72 are still there.
Yo man, can you upscale my life?
Millions years of evolution;
Tens of tousands of men involved;
The most incredible acheivement in human history;
The rise of AI technologie;
And after all that, all the sacrifices, all the time spend, all the efforts done...
TH-cam randomly shift the vid to 144 for no god damn reason.
Evolution.
Damn, that looks like fun! :)
Nicely done.
Drop the music track! (Why do people keep adding those? The air/ground loop is sufficient unto itself.)
Driving on the fucking moon, how did the public back then got bored of this?
Look at how the texture of the ground immediately changes from detailed in the fore, to fuzzy (low resolution) in the background.
Driving around in the moon must be so fucking dope
Это фантастика, спасибо)
а что за спиной?
It was an electric car with an electric motor in each wheel ! 🤯
Dust lolzzzzzzz NASA is fake
it looks like they can fall off the edge the blackness is spooky as hell
Love these old films being upscaled! Imagine if we had the technology we have today back then...
Your videos are fascinating, I'd love to see an old London upscaled, that would be fantastic.
Beautiful.
Как было бы прекрасно, если Луна бы была второй Землёй. Смотрели бы друг-друга в телескоп, летали бы туда-сюда кто имеет деньги.
Wow! Love your stuff
so you become 4K upscaler channel 👌
with 4K Subs right now
*a m a z i n g*
Breathtaking!
how the F u get all this old ass videos man btw i like them man they some kind of chilling and knowing how the early lifestyle was is awesome thx for the uploads.
Thank you very much for these wonderful videos.
How much footage does there exist where we could see an astronaut , who would be driving a buggy on the moon in large area, and where we would see him actually give any signs of being alive?
at around 2:00 is approaching the lunar module at that speed and risk hitting it and never coming back to Earth? If I had been an astronaut on the Moon, I would never have taken such a risk!
he's not that close.
Without atmospheric haze or any familiar objects to give you a point of reference for scale, distant objects appear closer than your human brain, which has evolved to estimate distance on earth, can discern.
@@Carl_Aznable it doesnt matter the distance, everything can happen, he should never pointed the lunar module.
@@nakekygt954
Dude, he wasn't going to hit it. And even if he did, he would have damaged the descent stage, so it wouldn't really matter. Come on, these people were not retards. They trained for this for days.
Nothing improves an important piece of history like a stupid soundtrack.
this is the real speed?
Nice work! Thankyu!
It's hard to imagine that the coldness there is near to absolute zero lol
I don't get how people can say that this footage "looks fake" when the way the dust behaves (falling back down immediately instead of staying up in the air) would only be possible in a place where there's no air at all... Such as the Moon.
Or maybe under water?
People don't say that the footage is fake, they say that it wasn't filmed on The Moon.
Take some heavy-particle dust (like powdered iron or rust) and see how it behaves in Earth's atmosphere. It'll settle down even faster than the one on the video.
BUT.
The thing is - it shouldn't fall down faster than on Earth in the first place. It should stay airborne LONGER than on Earth, and it has nothing to do with air pressure, but with gravity.
Moon's gravity is 17% of that on Earth. So if you take a ball of lead and drop it from 10 feet on Earth and on Moon, it will take 2,5 times longer to fall on the Moon. That's because S=a*t^2 formula, which nixes the difference pretty hard.
But 17% comes into full play when it comes to negating inertia of upward-bound objects, like dust that's being thrown from under rover's wheels. It takes SIX TIMES as long for dust to start falling down on Moon than on Earth. So the wheels should produce veritable fountains of dust riding with such speed.
When we compare fountains, we can pretty much ignore the atmosphere factor. While it helps particles stay afloat longer, it also hampers upward movement; thus, for fountain's longevity, it can pretty much be ignored.
@Mark Aim They didn't "lose" the tech as in "whoops, we don't know where the blueprints are, bummer !", it's lost because it's outdated. Seriously, it's already been explained several times; it's 70's tech we're talking about, what would be the point of building a 70's rocket today instead of starting from scratch to develop something safer, more advanced and adapted to today's standards ?
Those guys explained it better : www.quora.com/How-is-it-that-NASA-lost-the-technology-to-go-to-the-moon-It-blew-my-mind-when-NASA-said-this
@@Inieel
The dust is going up real high to me.
This is so amazing. Thank you
I'm glad Alan Watts got to see humanity go to the moon before he passed away in 1972
I love Kubrick films!!
magic10rm
Me too. SO why did you bring that up? Seems kind of random.
@@tqnohe It's an old joke. _When NASA realized they couldn't land on the moon, they hired Stanley Kubrick to film a fake moon mission. Unfortunately for them, Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he insisted they film on location._
Laughing Gravy
I know the joke. And the BS moon landing deniers’ claims.
The the very fact that Neil Armstrong apparently flubbed his big line show it wasn’t Kubrick. That guy would have done 50 takes to get it right.
I am Armstrong. No l am Armstrong. No I am Armstrong...........etc. .
@@tqnohe That's a very good point actually, I'll make sure to remember that whenever I see another one of those "fake dis wuz filmd by stenly rubik!!1" guys.
Fake! Were are the stars????!
Just kidding. Awesome!!!!
Fantastic work! Keep doing it!
The most expensive kart racing in history.