Deputies Stop Sheriff From Going Irate
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Be sure to check out the new video on the second channel here: th-cam.com/channels/lTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw.html
Yesssir
Subbed to the new channel brother!!
God Speed!!
Domari Nolo
PA III
Post on it more than once every 6 months, it's kinda barren at the moment.
just subbed. Quick question, is it just a coincidence that your name is the same as the man in Sacramento that was murdered by the police? Or is that a nod to recording police activities while keeping yourself anonymous?
i won’t be watching someone that sits alone on camera a wears a face diaper… let alone an American flag bandana ! 🐑
Audit the Audit gets an A. Although he could have invoked his right to remain anonymous on the internet more efficiently, he did a good job presenting his face without showing the community his mouth.
😂😂😂 well played.
And the commenters get a B+. As although this meme format is ripe for the picking, it will surely be overused in the future.
All-time comment!
Nitowa1 gets a B+. He made a descent review of John Lang, the creator and original voice over for Audit the Audit, he failed to recognize that his review was of John Lang and not his friend that he hired later on; a result of him not being able to do voice overs after a surgery. Also failed to note that the face mask was being worn improperly, failing to cover the nose as well as the mouth.
@@OmniscientWarrior Damn yours is better.
That is some grass-fed, Grade A Karen.
C- is way too kind.
In my book she definitely gets an 'F'.
C- is the second lowest grade the lowest being an F. The grade C- is usually given for those who’s general conduct is poor and don’t understand the laws but are still acting within the bounds of the law. Since she did not break any laws (and arguing that she should be in the room is well within her rights regardless of whether or not she’s correct) she gets a C-. I know it doesn’t feel fair but ATA is really good at being impartial so we get more grades based on the facts as opposed to what we feel they should get ya feel me.
Accusing someone to their face, in public, that they killed their wife is certainly designed to invite violence. Those would be "fighting words" and likely slander (assuming that after 10 years the Karen didn't have new evidence of his guilt).
I'm aware C- is the next-to-lowest grade, and I agree ATA is remarkably good at being impartial. I just feel that while she deserved a beat down, I'd settle for her getting an F.
C is for C U Next Tuesday. 😏
@@pkpyro2000 She also is disturbing the peace but intentionally going there to start issues, cussing, yelling at people in the room when being removed, and she has done this multiple times. She is literally just trying to intimidate them at this point.
The sheriff actually did better than I would have 😂
Talking about a man's dead wife, just to get a reaction. Would have to say he kept himself very controlled as most people would of received a punch to the face.
I would have lost me shot for him if I was there. Good on him. And good for his deputies too
I would be very hard pressed to find a person who reacts less than this police chief to such a vulgar statement
He killed his wife tho 🤔 he was driving that cart drunk along w his wife in it
Anyone controlled by someone else's words is a puppet.
Seems like the guy killed his wife and used his badge to sweep it under the rug🤷♂️
She’s one of the worst kinds of auditors. Immediately goes into fight mode, yelling, and name calling, are not good auditing techniques.
Well maybe if thug cops would actually FOLLOW THE LAW, people wouldn't get irate.
@@Nekulturny: Try watching the video sometime. _These_ cops _did_ follow the law, and "John" gave a great example of law that shows _why_ they did.
Maybe because shes not an auditor you doofus, she was trying to film that meeting for political purposes it seems.
@@xL3THALityx she’s pushing her rights to try and provoke them. She has multiple videos doing so. She’s doing the same thing as self proclaimed auditors. I was just stating she is the worst kind of person for police interactions. Thinking she knows everything, and knows nothing. And her attitude is combative and immature.
She's not an auditor. She's just a nuisance.
She gets an F for violating basic decency. Accusing a man of killing his wife without any evidence to back her claim is really low class. I'm glad the Sheriff maintained his composure, for a second I thought he was going to back hand her and that would have been a tragedy for his career. She's a disruptor and should be ignored.
Absent evidence, and having uploaded this publicly, which would be considered a broadcast, I believe she has committed libel, potentially criminal but definitely civil.
If I were him, I would seek a temporary protection order, file a criminal complaint for libel and harassment if possible, and sue her.
@@kritsadventures I would have probably beat her tbh.
Such a low blow that had no benefit. She's like a 12 yo not getting her way.
nah
It takes a very brave, or very stupid person to say something like that to an armed person.
That voice....
A nice touch of nostalgia to start the day with.
The new guys voice is a million times better though.
How many people work on these videos now?
Yeah new guys voice is where it's at I'm sure the views prove it. That's all I've heard since I've been on this channel
@@bestsnowboarderuknow ya I actually prefer the other voiceover too.
crappy, he should never narrate again
She was trying to escalate the situation by yelling and saying below the belt terrible personal insults. She is an embarrassment to the auditing community. I have friends who are auditors and they are ashamed of her. SMH
She’s definitely the kind of auditor I would never watch.
This wasn't an objective representation of this encounter. Rummel went on to explain that the rules of the building were the County use of the building is open to the public for ALL meetings where space is allotted free of charge. Private meetings are allowed for rent of a space. The GOP didn't rent the room. The meeting was open. Review the source video.
She’s actually awesome and someone I will support 100%. You have no idea the shit she deals with and the past shes had with this sherif.
@@gladfam8967 The fact that she mockingly said “you killed your wife” likely with a smirk on her face is everything you need to know about her.
@@gladfam8967 I have a feeling neither do you. Just a hunch.
@@thebizend Right? Its like "I'm an expert on the subject because I watch her edited POV videos on the internet".
This woman is obviously insane
The question is why is it a C- and not an F
She was legally wrong in every possible regard and acted like a cruel petty child throwing a hissy fit in a lobby
Yep poor rating
This wasn't an objective representation of this encounter. Rummel went on to explain that the rules of the building were the County use of the building is open to the public for ALL meetings where space is allotted free of charge. Private meetings are allowed for rent of a space. The GOP didn't rent the room. The meeting was open. Review the source video.
She got a c because she is a c
@@chuckhaugan4970 You are correct she did explain the rules, how ever, she explained them wrong, and incorrectly, most likely on purpose to manipulate people like you.
@@sheldondinkleberg6525 BS!!! She quoted them exactly from the Denton County ordinance. What are you talking about? Oh, you didn't go to the source video. You should do some basic research before you type.
yikes, gotta side with the sheriff on this one. accusing the man for killing his wife? she was clearly kicked out for a reason
Well the thing is she died in a very strange way and noone ever question it either accident death or like she saying on purpose but it all got sweep by his buddies so noone ever gonna know.
In the streets, those ARE fighting words.
Exactly. I was on her side up until that point. Unreal that she brought that up
@@justinpurcell3717
If they're government employees then stating facts and inferences without threats even if it meant to insult, then there's nothing the cop can do.
You're right, he probably thinks he did have a good reason to kick her out of the golf cart.
C- seems far too high. Highly antagonistic and not knowing the laws fully
C- is the second lowest grade the lowest being an F. The grade C- is usually given for those who’s general conduct is poor and don’t understand the laws but are still acting within the bounds of the law. Since she did not break any laws (and arguing that she should be in the room is well within her rights regardless of whether or not she’s correct) she gets a C-. I know it doesn’t feel fair but ATA is really good at being impartial so we get more grades based on the facts as opposed to what we feel they should get ya feel me.
@@pkpyro2000 You can also get the D
@@gwanael34 I don't know, man. You see the pic of her? I'm not sure I'd give her the D, though she may need one! LOL.
Ya no kidding, that was way to generous. She gives anyone advocating for constitutional protections a bad name.
@@gwanael34 i don’t think ATA has given a D lettering before i think it generally goes A B C F and they skip D
Should have been an "F". Fact is she didn't know the law and resorted to personal vulgar insults. That seems like a failure to me.
C- is the second lowest grade the lowest being an F. The grade C- is usually given for those who’s general conduct is poor and don’t understand the laws but are still acting within the bounds of the law. Since she did not break any laws (and arguing that she should be in the room is well within her rights regardless of whether or not she’s correct) she gets a C-. I know it doesn’t feel fair but ATA is really good at being impartial so we get more grades based on the facts as opposed to what we feel they should get ya feel me.
@@pkpyro2000 ok, point taken in this assessment of legality but she gets an F according to a purely moral scale.
I find nothing wrong with personal and vulgar insult to on-duty law enforcement. I am not saying that as a ACAB edgelord, but keeping your cool under *all* situations and encounters is vital skill for law enforcement and citizens need to ensure that law enforcement is able to do so.
@@hollyhunt9116 agreed
Not to mention she picks the local gop meeting to flex her rights? Why not video Pfizer or moderna. At least trying to fight back lawfully and legally on what seeks to tip our world over. Not some good ole boys having a local meeting
"Look how mad you are.. just look how mad you are" to a man standing still not raising his voice. After she's been yelling and making threats for at least 10 minutes.
I think Karen needs some time in front of a mirror for a reality check.
Even if laws where broken, or her rights where somehow wronged. Her own wrongful actions caused her issues.
"I'm not yelling, you're yelling!" She, sceams
Sadly this is almost how every attack against the GOP goes these days.
To be clear, I'm not saying there aren't legitimate grievances against the GOP nor am I saying that Republicans never use this tactic.
However, almost all of attacks against Republicans from the left go like this these days... just maybe a little less (literal) screaming.
@@subtlename2873 lol. Calm down. You’re describing immature behavior, not a tactic against the GOP. I don’t agree with any of her actions here but spare us this persecution narrative esp. from the right. 😂
@@mattskeens803 problem is, its not a narrative. It's SOP these days.
CNN, MSNBC, every press briefing with a Democrat in congress, local Activision in most major metropolitan areas. Tell me again how this is an isolated incident.
What was once random has been normalized and its un acceptable. Want stronger immigration control? Racist.
Want better fiscal policy so tax breaks have to be changed? You must hate poor people. Want more accountability? Well, that's inconvenient so we'll just cry about how you're a man and don't understand.
Look mate, this isn't me attacking you and it's certainly not personal but if you can't see what's going on you're either willfully ignorant or you have your head somewhere it doesn't belong.
That particular phrase was not yelled. She yelled before and after.
Looks how mad you are! *She said while absolutely seething with rage*
She's not interested in real auditing, not acting in the interests of the wider public, she has her own axe to grind.
A vile woman bringing up his wife's demise.
Good on the sheriff and his deputies. What she was screaming would have pissed of anyone.
Calling out a murderer seems legit
@@NG-cf7zh you didn't even attempt to look up what happened I see.
She's scary-crazy...her channel is a whole can of nuts
I love the fairness of this channel. There is no regard for political opinions or personal beliefs, it is just straight interpretation of the law and applied fairly to every participant, law enforcement or civilian. This is absolutly phenomenal.
This episode is a great learning lesson. Before you flex your rights, make sure there is a law to backup your flex. Treating a non governmental group as a governmental group is an easy oversite to make.
She tried. She interviewed the Sherriff and was told 20 min before the meeting that is was a PUBLIC meeting. There is a CONGRESSMAN in there. She checked to see if they reserved the room, and PAID. They did not. It's awfully hard to know the law when they can tell you so many lies. Watch the whole thing. He is sooooo guilty of something and they are conspiring to hide something in a public space....
@@jackiesue9907 I watched the whole thing on another channel. I thought it was outrageous how she was singled out. I probably should back up on what I said after seeing what is happening to foul mouth veteran and bully back audits. They can find a law at anytime to arrest anybody.
@@jackiesue9907 It was a meeting open to the public and in a public space, however, they chose to use that facility for a private meeting as well. Payment is not a requirement to have a private meeting.
@@jackiesue9907 Because they didn't pay for the room doesn't automatically make it public. There is a difference between a "public meeting" and a "meeting open to the public", especially when it's organized by a private non-government entity. When run by a private entity, EVEN if a congressman is present can close the meeting to the public. This is what happened and is totally legal and allowed. Reasons don' t matter... it's their choice. Just because it's a government building doesn't make it open to anyone. Also, just because it's a government building doesn't neccessarily make it open to the public either. All levels of government can and do limit access to their spaces.
This wasn't an objective representation of this encounter. Rummel went on to explain that the rules of the building were the County use of the building is open to the public for ALL meetings where space is allotted free of charge. Private meetings are allowed for rent of a space. The GOP didn't rent the room. The meeting was open. Review the source video.
More officers need to step in when they see a coworkers losing their cool. It's so easy to make a wrong move when pushed to the limit like that. Glad he was able to remain composed in the end.
A police officer with a gun and power over the public is a bit different. The public can't afford officers that can't control their emotions. 2 solution possible change jobs or trainning and desk duty until they can do their job.It's a hard job but ullimited power on a citizen life is unscceptable.
Haven't watched all the way through yet, but this bit$# wanted to get punched in the face
More members of the public need to have self control when facing compromise. This woman should be absolutely ashamed of herself.
I think this is part of the George Floyd Policing Act because some officers standing by did nothing to intervene while other officers were busy murdering Floyd.
@@faulker2p Yeah I agree you really need a level head and the ability to flip that emotional switch.
Her attitude throughout the entire video definitely would justify the GOP in closing the meeting and asking her to leave. She’s probably the type of person who interrupts the meetings with her “facts” and unwarranted opinions. Good job Sheriff.
In a strange way, I was proud of the Sheriff for maintaining his composure.
This Karen has some issues
hmmm
@@normanno8514 what lol
The Karen force was strong with this one
Hard to tell whether her really telling face is the result of injustices suffered or indicating the cause of all those tensions.
@@Lando-oz7hd im not buying the narrative - part of which is that a serving officer should be commended for not acting violently towards a woman - on the rare occasions when the police do their job professionally we are all supposed to lose our shit .- everyone else in society has to do their jobs professionally at all times or they are dismissed. I am also opposed to calling someone who is passionate about the constitution a karen.
She didn’t have to say that about his wife. That was just messed up. She was looking to run him hot.
she was only there to be a democrat and to interrupt republicans. She was not there to audit. This audit was no audit it was more political circusism
She didn't have to, but she had the balls to and I'm proud of her for it - Sherriff Murphy is a corrupt PoS who isn't fit to wear that badge or that very fine hat of his. But hey, if what she said is untrue then he can sue her in court, just like he advised her to do with the public meeting that illegally blocked her from entry.
She 110% should've, keeps police honest. They are words, get over it
@@nerol9929 You seem to have a very fragile understanding of how democracy works my friend. Believe it or not, Republicans crappy fashion sense and Bible-bashing doesn't make them immune from corruption or poor behaviour. This woman's First Amendment rights were just violated - THAT is something that actual Republicans should be concerned about, but apparently they only care about the First Amendment when it's protecting racists and homophobes.
@@nerol9929 She's not a Democrat.
This sheriff and deputy group seems fairly well run/calm and level headed
Your ability to remain objective and stick to what is written in law is so, so refreshing. I appreciate and thank you for your content.
No he wasn't objective. Rummel went on to explain that the rules of the building were the County use of the building is open to the public for ALL meetings where space is allotted free of charge. Private meetings are allowed for rent of a space. The GOP didn't rent the room. The meeting was open.
@@chuckhaugan4970 did you like actually watch the video, he quite literally explained why it wasn't open.
@@Shrine0112 And omitted the part about county policy. The GOP DID NOT RENT THE ROOM!!!! THE COUNTY ONLY ALLOWS CLOSED MEETINGS WHEN COMPENSATED! This lady did her homework and if you go to the source video, she states the rules, chapter and verse, from the county page!!!! Go To the source video and watch the entire thing. This was a hatchet job by ATA who definitely has an axe to grind with this lady's politics. I subscribe to her and view her vids of where she opposes white supremist rallies and crap GOP/RNC/Trump bills in Texas, like the two passed recently. Do your homework before you type!
@@chuckhaugan4970 It doesn’t matter if it’s rented or not, and almost no county buildings charge in the first place. You can be removed from a public event. They reserved the room for their purposes. They can ask her to leave. If she doesn’t, she can be removed. These are not elected officials conducting public business in that capacity. I’ve been an elected officer for local parties and attended/organized at local/state dem party meetings for 12 years. She can be removed rent or not. The permission they received to conduct their business. Political trackers try to sit in/record these all of the time. I wouldn’t want or allow them to do that either. While they couldn’t have her physically removed they can hust go to county official who gave them permission to be there to have her removed.
@@chuckhaugan4970 Someone mad about constitutional carry and not being allowed to murder babies? Lol cry more.
She didn’t understand the law but spoke as if she did, she was yelling and being belligerent, and she used VERY personal insults against a guy that kept his cool. She deserved an F
She sounds like the average cop. XD
I would give her an F minus
Facts. She also could’ve been kept out for being disruptive / belligerent
I am glad the Sheriffs mental fortitude got so much recognition. Not only had he dealt with losing his wife to an unfortunate accident but have had people use that incident to try to affect his career, but now some bitch comes up and makes seemingly baseless accusations in regards to it just to get back at him. Dude deserves an A+ for pulling that off
I agree, she was despicable.
If the issue is about the conference then keep those intentions. Don't accuse people of murder and bring up your own personal problems related to other encounters.
Yeah, that was totally uncalled for. What in the world would make a person say that... I get that she was mad, but good god that's one despicable woman.
Agree 100%. I think we have a Karen on our hands in this one.
She didn’t accuse him of anything. She said he killed his wife, and he DID. If you did the long read on this sheriff you’ll see he’s a scumbag.
@@charliefromstarkvillemissi1852 was he tried and sentenced?
@@godsteeth1574 no, it was buried and not investigated just like 99% of all crimes committed by cop are. It’s a shame for them that cameras now exist, so they can’t tell us that Ronald Greene “died in a car crash” when he was beaten to death on camera.
Wow, she is low, low , low!! If she is an auditor, I am embarrassed for the whole auditing community.
I don’t care about anything else but I commend Dude for keeping his cool about her saying he killed his own wife, that’s outta line
Because he did...
@@FernandoRodriguez-ds5ri did he? Idk About that I believe u doe
He did kill his wife
He did not kill his wife. The two of them were riding in the back of a golf cart when the driver drove over a drop off and she fell out and struck her head. He wasn’t driving. No one was drunk. It was a tragic accident.
@@C.O._Jones thats fucked up.
9:56 "Look how mad you are! You're f*****g mad! You can hardly control yourself!" -- that's what is commonly known as projection.
Laughed when he turned to the one cop and started screeeeaming "Look at you!! You're mad aren't you?! LOOK HOW MAD YOU ARE, YOU CAN BARELY CONTROL YOURSELF!!!" 😂🤣
This chick has got to be the most irritating "auditor" I've ever seen
They all are.
She is an activist not so much an auditor.
That woman gets an F. She was billegerent and brought up the stuff about his wife just to antagonize him. Rude.
nay, if looks can kill the sheriff would be locked up.
Rude does not equal illigal. The job of a cop is to enforce the law, not etiquette.
@@justincenter4061 no one said otherwise ?
@@justincenter4061 I never said that rude =illegal. She started off belligerent and the sheriff kept his cool pretty well under the circumstances.
@@justincenter4061 yeah, but if the police is rude, you have a fucking lawsuit or complain back to the PD or courtroom. Goddamn people who are entitled to think that they can talk to law enforcement like trash because "they serve the people".
Whether right or wrong in her stance on the matter… her eventual speech and behaviour makes it reasonable in my opinion to refuse her entry.
It would be interesting if Audit the Audit examined some family disputes in the home:
“Here, Mother is factually correct and is within her authority to tell Little Timothy that he is not allowed to throw food on the floor. However, it is likely a jury would make allowances for the age of Little Timothy and his inability to properly understand the concept of a dirty floor or keeping food on your plate. Therefore, while Mother has the power to issue a 'time out' punishment, a more reasonable response would have been to de-escalate the situation and simply explain that it was the wrong thing to do in a stern but calm voice, thus avoiding the 30 minutes of crying that followed." 😁👍
underrated comment
You really painted the picture, I can practically hear his voice say it
😂
Maybe for April Fool's day? This would make my day!
oh man, dude you WIN! that was funny
The lady got an F in my book. It may have been all legally protected speech but you never speak ill of the dead to provoke a response from the widower.
Miss Rummol gets an F.
That was certainly fighting words.That officer lost his wife recently in a golf cart accident, you cant fake that level of pure anger that instantly appears on his face when she slanders him in such a manner.
A lesser person would of smacked the bitch but ultimately he kept his cool. That speaks to his character.
A+ to that sheriff.
That sherif is a murder and deserves to be in jail.
Really? Can you point me towards the evidence to suggest so?
@@CALLaBOOTY09 booty call fool
@@CALLaBOOTY09
Please present hard evidence, otherwise your talking out of your ass.
She incorrectly asserted that she knew the public meeting law even though she clearly did not understand the executive session exceptions. She is dangerous because she is ignorant and ignorant to the fact of her ignorance. She should have been kicked out and trespassed from the building. She should have received an F.
C- is awfully generous for Ms. Rummel. How it even occurred to her she was allowed to attend and record a meeting of the GOP is beyond comprehension. There are many private and restricted locations within public buildings. The very notion is ridiculous.
C- is the second lowest grade the lowest being an F. The grade C- is usually given for those who’s general conduct is poor and don’t understand the laws but are still acting within the bounds of the law. Since she did not break any laws (and arguing that she should be in the room is well within her rights regardless of whether or not she’s correct) she gets a C-. I know it doesn’t feel fair but ATA is really good at being impartial so we get more grades based on the facts as opposed to what we feel they should get ya feel me.
@@pkpyro2000 Sorry, but a D is lower than C-. There's actually D+, D, and D-. I'm not sure AtA employs the D letter grade, so you may be correct but in the American parochial system the D is used. And that's what this chick deserves, a good solid D.
In her defense, any political groups when using public property should absolutely be open to recording from the public. Go pay to rent space if you don't want it to be open.
@@dcast777 Not saying your not right just talking bout the grading system
@@dcast777 That's a bit extreme. I have no love for the GOP, but they are a legitimate political party and I can completely understand they'd want to have a closed executive session where they can discuss strategy and float ideas without being exposed to the general public.
I see your point, it being a public building, but it really isn't a big ask for the space to be used on a temporary basis by a lawful group meeting for lawful purposes. Moreover, it seems like a small local branch, so they probably wouldn't have the funds to rent a hall and there are too many to meet in a private home. At a certain point one needs to ask, what's the harm?
C- is still a passing grade, and I can't understand how you would give that performance anything above a fail. She had no right to be there and was essentially coddled by those officers who could have justifiably removed or arrested her. When she showed her true colors and attacked the sheriff's dead wife and accused him of killer her, that was absolutely worthy of a big old F.
I'm going to have to give A2A an F for getting this one wrong. The woman was legally and morally wrong.
She was yelling. She is the one that was mad, she was trying to piss him off. She just seems like a antagonist
She had every right to be mad, they went out their way to piss her off. It appears you have double standards which make your point of view redundant
@@monkeyfunk8371 No she didn't. She had no right to sit in and film a private meeting, and certainly to grounds to be angry she was thrown out.
She was being bullied and the fact she was filming was the issue. Hell I fail to remember the reason they said why she can't be in there. Which tells me that they avoided pointing out it's because she is filming because they didn't want it to look bad.
@@jasonlongton1876 It was not private though
It's funny how the Republican party in the U.S can censor it's people worse than China's Communist party and still convince people that the U.S is the good guy.
Okay. This was a meeting of the REPUBLICAN PARTY in a government building? The party used police officers as security?
This is the problem I have with how the two parties are treated. These parties are given so much assistance that it is basically impossible for third party candidates to have a meaningful chance to be competitive.
Public spaces can be used by private organizations, I have seen public halls used for weddings, it is allowed.
Well Washington warned everyone 300 years ago but nobody listened.
@@BudMasta It is absolutely fascinating how you never hear about that.
AND, Robert E. Lee was against any type of monument, etc of the Confederacy.
AND Eisenhower warned us about the military industrial complex.
It's amazing how myopic we can be.
@@glee21012 do you not think that there's a difference between celebrating a wedding in a public building and an organization that wants to change how the local government is run or resist change to hope the local government is run using the content electrons building to home private meetings and use law enforcement to enforce their privacy?
@@mervyngreene6687 That Eisenhower speech right before he left office is an absolute classic! He predicted what’s going on today regarding the military industrial complex to the T !!
Back when i was doing security your vids taught me alot and gave me perspective for how my interactions look.
We actually get to see the legend himself... kind of
Audit the Audit always has top-tier content
But a mask with an exposed nose will make even the best of us look dumb af
@@christianv7177 might be for more anonymity
@@christianv7177 speak for yourself lmao
@@ballpuncher0000 there's cooler ways to conceal one's identity
@@christianv7177 You do realize he's wearing just to mask his identity, not to protect anyone from Covid?
I can't say what a court might say, but outright saying to his face "Ya and you killed your wife didn't you?" as an accusation of something he had previously been cleared from would have counted as "personal abuse" in my book.
Freedom of Speech is a "wonderful" thing in the US Constitution. Basically you can never get any douchebag arrested/fined for saying shit that would get him or her punched in the face otherwise.
I love how she walks into their stationary hands and then yells "Don't you touch me!"
for once i genuinely feel bad for the sheriff. i can't believe she said "you killed your wife" with absolutely no evidence, just rumors. that is so unbelievably messed up, especially over such a minor inconvenience with her not being allowed to go in. those are definitely "fighting words"
40% chance he DID kill her.
@@SeanTheOriginal yeah true. 50%
Insulting someone over their private matter is the lowest thing you could do to someone else.
In these case, if someone brings up a persons dead family member, I don’t really see the recipient as an officer anymore and would be totally fine with them expressing their grief. Auditor is a terrible person, she’s not auditing the law and maintaining her rights, she entitled and privileged and just doesn’t want people telling her what to do.. so she resorted to cheap insults 🙄
Idk, I can’t tell if the C was low enough. She invoked the officer and tried to get him to react. She pushed his buttons on purpose and that itself is very dangerous. And then to go and badger this man on her channel? While she has the right I guess, it’s very close to defamation if not harassment. Her comments on this video clearly shows over 1000 people have a clear misunderstanding of the laws. That’s not good for any auditors.
She got a C- . The only lower grade that ATA gives out is an F. She didn’t break the law so it wouldn’t be correct to give her an F
@@tanvir6267 I get that, but I mean a C- is implying she’s not doing “much” wrong. Yeah, I get it she didn’t break any laws in the video but her behavior following the video with imploring her audience to do foolishness in which we just established she should’ve just left and moved on but because she didn’t know what she was talking about she stayed, caused a scene, which seems disorderly to me, and continued to badger the sheriff. I’ve seen people get arrested for standing around after the police told them to move along and she stayed and continued to try and show her power. I’m all fo a good proper audit but if you’re not going to do it correctly you’re hurting the movement especially with officers who try and at least be amicable with you. That’s not easy to find. Officer should’ve gotten an A because he had his buttons pushed and couldn’t be moved. If anyone told you “you killed your wife too didn’t you?!” you’d be livid especially knowing you didn’t. That’s low idc how much you don’t like the police, now if he had said “that’s why your son got shot” it’d be a huge uproar. Can’t expect them to treat you like a human if you’re acting like a animal.
@@charlesdemeary did you watch the whole video? ATA literally lists out the reasons why he gave her a C- & to me it seemed like the implication was harsher than what you’re presenting.
With the police grading section he even mentions that he commends the police for managing to stay calm from her “vulgar remarks”.
Bottom line is if he gave her an F for not breaking the law, but instead for being a garbage human in that moment, it would show that ATA is thinking emotionally, instead of from a legal perspective for his grading of her.
So if ATA did what you suggest he would literally be the thing you are currently accusing him of being (that being a non professional audit channel).
@@tanvir6267 all that’s fine, and I get what you’re saying about the rating but a D- was well in order for the auditor. I’m aware they don’t give D’s but this was warranted. I heard all the reasons why he gave the grades and I’m saying I disagree. Should’ve been different 🤷🏾♂️.
@@charlesdemeary if D rating doesn’t exist for ATA isn’t it nonsensical to argue that he should of given her a D rating?
C- is extremely generous. She should have gotten an F, John.
"You can’t just make up the law as you go along." Oh, boy. The irony.
Hahaha, yep! She didn't do enough research!
What she said to that Sheriff was such a low blow. The pain he’s been through all those years of losing a wife and to hear that… that’s disrespect at its finest.
I'm a recent subscriber and recently have watched many of your videos. I find them very informative and you do a great job narrating the police encounters and explaining information in a way that's easily understood. You do a great public service making these videos and I personally appreciate the work you do. Maybe it's just me, but sometimes it seems that some of the people that shoot these videos saying they are just "exercising their rights" are intentionally trying to get a rise out of the police. I understand why it's important for people to exercise their rights and challenge the police's knowledge on law and the constitution to teach others who may not know better what rights they have and how to not let government officials violate those rights. Its just to me some of the people featured in your videos are using "exercising their rights" as an excuse to give the police a hard time while they intentionally antagonize them using profanity and insulting speech. They could get much better results staying calm and trying to do things in a way that could be a benefit to all parties. Its like they intentionally want to anger the police into breaking the law or violating their rights.
Looking at her channel, it looks to me like it was never about the meeting or documenting anything. It looks to me like it's merely a grudge held by a political activist being carried out. She also does a good job of pretending to be smart by articulating well, but at the core of it she truly has no clue what the hell she's talking about.
Accusing someone of killing their wife, and publishing that accusation on the internet would be grounds for a lible case. It wasn't a statement of opinion rather than fact nor a "fair comment and criticism" ... which means she would have to prove it was true. Texas recognises that Allegations or imputations of crimes of moral turpitude are categories of false statements that are so innately harmful that they are considered to be defamatory per se. In the common law tradition, damages for such false statements are presumed and do not have to be proven.
It would be, but then she gets to do discovery on this unmitigated piece of shit, that, in fact, probably did kill his wife. Spend 5 minutes googling this monster before shedding any more alligator tears for him.
Think san joaquin audits channel has a good breakdown of the story.
He is a public figure and in order for a libel case to be met would have to prove that she knows that her statements are untrue which is not possible.
@@matthewmartin1080 "in fact" and "probably did" contradict each other. It's innocent until proven guilty
He was driving a vehicle that she drunkenly fell out of. Even completely putting aside the uncertainty as to his own state of sobriety; she never claimed he "murdered" his wife, she said "killed", and all the existing and accepted facts lead to that as a reasonable conclusion for someone to come to.
The idea of "fighting words," or words being too offensive to even utter under the guise of "keeping the peace and morality," is completely contradictory to the supreme court upholding that hate speech is free speech, and if saying things specifically to upset people isn't considered free speech, then what the woman said about the sheriff's wife shouldn't be protected by the first amendment, per the court's logic. It's silly, it should all be free speech. The only example of fighting words should be direct instigation, such as egging someone on (e.g telling someone to swing first), not saying something that may be considered offensive. What is offensive to someone is entirely subjective.
Strong Karen energy here. I cannot blame the sheriff for escalating after her comments about his deceased wife.
Still unprofessional. Police should be held to a higher standard. He was lucky his colleagues were there to set him straight.
@@cdogthehedgehog6923 definitely unprofessional. Props for not pulling out handcuffs though. She was throwing everything at him to get arrested. He shouldn’t have put hands on her and pushed her though.
@@stairmasternem He did better than I would have in that situation. That's for sure. But that's one of the many reasons I'm not a cop and he is lol. His restraint and his colleagues emotional awareness are commendable here.
@@cdogthehedgehog6923 which does highlight a thing. It’s not just one decent sheriff, his colleagues at least had situational awareness.
@@stairmasternem Yissiry. No one can have perfect reactions every day every time. And if this is a "bad" reaction from him, he's doing alright. Not perfect, and even though he should be held to a higher standard, he's still human.
Audit the Audit gets a B+ for revealing his face but only half of it.
She failed on every level. She deserves an F. I love ATA, but come on. She failed... a C- is a passing grade.
This lady was the unprofessional one, and crossed the line by accusing the sheriff of killing his wife because she was angry.
This wasn't an objective representation of this encounter. Rummel went on to explain that the rules of the building were the County use of the building is open to the public for ALL meetings where space is allotted free of charge. Private meetings are allowed for rent of a space. The GOP didn't rent the room. The meeting was open. Review the source video.
Lmfao bruh she’s hilarious😂😭😭😭😭she went from tryna make a point which wasn’t even a good point to completely bashing the officer😭😭😭
"You don't get to make up laws as you go along..." **I do.**
This wasn't an objective representation of this encounter. Rummel went on to explain that the rules of the building were the County use of the building is open to the public for ALL meetings where space is allotted free of charge. Private meetings are allowed for rent of a space. The GOP didn't rent the room. The meeting was open. Review the source video.
@@chuckhaugan4970 You are correct she did explain the rules, how ever, she explained them wrong, and incorrectly, most likely on purpose to manipulate people like you.
@@sheldondinkleberg6525 You didn't do any research. Why don't you try that? She is 100% correct. That was a public meeting;
IMO, I don't think the sheriff would have hit her regardless of deputies being there or not. Someone putting their hand into a fist can also be a stress-induced habit. It doesn't necessarily have to be an indication that someone is about to become violent. It's like clenching your teeth or using a stress ball. The act of causing pressure as a way to relieve stress is typical behavior. Plus, I have to commend him for his professionalism. How many of us could honestly say we would have taken, "you murdered your wife" well in his situation? That's extremely insensitive and an intentional act to cause emotional distress. He has to live with that accident for the rest of his life. He has to wake up every day without his wife beside him and briefly think was I the cause of that? I cannot imagine the personal torture he has more than likely put himself through every single day.
wasn't this guy suspected of harming his wife?
@@adcolt54 I can only go off the information provided in this ATA video. I couldn't tell you if domestic abuse was another factor. Typically, unless proven I wouldn't take "suspected" into consideration because it usually amounts to the level of rumor rather than facts.
@@adcolt54 ya everyone here crying about the dead wife comment but he has a long history of corruption, abuse, and alcoholism.
Thank you, detective CallaBOOTY09 this case wouldn't have been solved without you.
Mr. Lang, you are the boss! I am amazed how you always find the relevant code and case law!!
they should have taken a marker and wrote "- Executive meeting: now" on the schedule lol
A respectful person with a heart will not use the Constitution as an excuse to talk about a man's dead wife.
This is the 1st time that I've seen your face, Audit the Audit.
LET ME JUST KEEP YELLING BECAUSE THAT REALLY MAKES EVERYTHING I SAY ACCURATE !!! Wow, I can't watch auditors like her.
That comment about his wife, she deserved a slap for that. He was much nicer than I would have been.
Great to hear your voice again.
I love the new guy too. He's fantastic.
God I wish we had her reaction when she realized she made a fool of herself.
What was her motivation for being there? She’s awfully emotional like there’s something affecting her personally
Oh my god we finally get to see the face behind the og voice!!! What a blessing, hope all is well, Mr John Long!!!!
I’m only halfway through, but accusing the sheriff of killing his dead wife is out of line that is absolutely disgusting. I would never watch this woman never in 1 million years. Also, you can’t just say I’m going in that room no matter what you say turn around and then walk into a line of men that are blocking your way and then yell at them for touching you. No ma’am they did not touch you that’s you touching them. what a freaking ignorant idiot. 😂
And closed meetings for lobbyists. Closed meetings help our fearless leaders make deals easier.
I would've lost my shit if I was accused of murdering my wife.
He did tho? Then used his official capacity to not hear the music.
But would you feel that way if you did, infact, kill your wife ?
@@Joseph.M. got proof?
I can't stand people that scream. You can get your point across by calmly speaking and making eye contact, using names
I miss you doing the voice work, I hope you'll continue to do some of the future shows as well.
I'm sorry. I'm normally on the side of the person, not the cops. But in this one. I think the cops did the right thing until dude got upset. But still at that point I could under stand y he was frustrated.
Wow, she hit below the belt. That’s sad.
I’m sure there is another side to this story. She most likely made a scene in the meeting, and they politely asked her to leave
There's absolutely nothing about "you killed your wife" that's screams C- . That's an instant fail in my book.
She clearly has a personal issue here. This isn't what auditing is about and how it should be used.
We need to know cops can keep their cool under any situation. Citizens should know wether or not a cop will turn violent if you say the wrong words.
@@justincenter4061 and that means what when it comes to her grade?
@@justincenter4061 And she is still a failure as a member of our community and person as a whole.
@@GenerationalDisappointment I agree with the C-.
If she recorded herself making this accusation(which she did) and intended to upload it on the internet(which she prob did)....could she potentially have committed the crime of slander? C- seems far too low for a likely crime being committed by the trash citizen
She is the definition of light’s on but nobody is home…..
What a shitty thing to say someone. Even if you despise someone, you lose any argument when you sink that low.
Holy smokes this lady is a psycho... Good on the GoP for kicking her out and good on this Sheriff for holding his cool against a remark obviously intended to make him lose it.
The lady should have kept needling the sheriff over killing his wife until he snapped. Then she really would have had a money maker lawsuit on her hands. People should antagonize law enforcement whenever and wherever they can.
I missed the part where the deputies stopped the sheriff from going irate. And the "CALM DOWN BOSS" from the thumbnail. We all enjoy the channel and the content. The clickbait techniques are in poor taste, in my opinion.
I agree. Odd
Wording a title and choosing a thumbnail to get more people to check in is fine. More clicks and views means more revenue for the content creator and it's channel and in turn can mean more quality content for the viewer. At the end of the day we still received the type of content we've come to expect from AtA so I'm not disappointed.
I sense a Karen...
Yea, I am about 5 minutes into the video and I sense a Karen 😆 if I am wrong I be deleting this comment 😆
Why would she say such a horrible thing? She isn't very professional.
As a former county chair of a political party I have held many open meetings in public settings free of charge. I also held them in public schools which the State I lived in required to be free of charge. As the chair I could declare into executive session any time I wanted and allow whatever persons I wanted to remain as long as it was in accordance with the rules of my group. The governmental rules on executive session do not apply to private groups. The lady was abusive and disorderly.
PS he didn’t kill his wife, he wasn’t even driving the golf cart she fell from whilst standing up in it joyriding, fell and hit her head on pavement.
I already looked up how she died and he wasn’t to blame, it was an accident
I don't want to be flippant about his loss but dangit she sounds like she was a fun lady! Even if he had been driving that would take some skill to off someone in a golf cart accident, it wasn't even a Quad. For someone to use her death as a political campaign rumor when he ran for Sheriff shows just how low they had to go digging for dirt. Also if I ever die in a golf cart incident surrounded by friends full of margaritas I expect the full story to be available on my Ancestry DNA for all my generations to read like, "Yep, that's my fam."
@Facetious Universe she fell from off the Back of the golf cart, there are 4 seats ya know. She was Standing off the back and towards the Side of said golf cart. Maybe she was standing cuz he Possibly did take up most of the seat.
Just look up the article Yourself
The narrator does an excellent job, no doubt about it. I do like how you occasionally pop in and narrate one yourself, though, "for old time's sake." I assume you write all of them, so good job on creating educational and entertaining content. The balanced way you portray every side of these interactions is useful to anyone who takes the time to watch, and should be required viewing for both law enforcement, and high school kids.
Yeah, I get the high rating for the sheriff. How many times have we seen law enforcement escalate a situation that starts out pretty benign, whereas here he did a really good job staying calm and explaining the situation, even with her trying to escalate.
I agree with his "so sue them" comment, as in, he's not a judge, he's just there to keep the peace, and she wasn't being peaceful.
Did the political party pay for the private use of the building and the "private" (Sheriff's dept) security?
If no, then the Sheriff should've enforced that it was a PUBLIC building open to the public and she was allowed to be there.
This is akin to me declaring the sidewalk in front of my house as "private", and then having the police enforce it for me whenever anyone walks down the street.
@@beepbop6697 Except we know public buildings don't work that way, as in you can be trespassed from public buildings. There are also restrictions that can be enforced, such as no recording. I think this is where a TON of 1A auditors fumble.
I feel like you failed to cover the fact that the organizer of the GOP meeting in a public tax paid facility setting did not go through the proper channels and was in fact given special out of process approval.
A lil context on why she was upset and pointing out the misuse of power and tax payer money (process and approval not respected and was in fact given special treatment) should have been highlighted to give a more honest context of why she was upset for being kicked out.
It may be their right to remove her as the session then became private but the whole use of public facility was a misuse of power and given special treatment. Keep in mind, special treatment and favoring to organize towards secession, which can lead to a treasonous civil war. Context matters.
I really like ata's analysis. But i agree that there is some ground for more political party / public space analysis. If the law allows gifting of public space for private meetings there should be protection that those gifts are given fairly.
Executive session also usually means just those with positions of power to make decisions and exicute the rules. Not everyone but Karen.
If that's how she interacts with people it's no wonder she was not allowed in the meeting, she is a dispicable person who intentionally antagonised the situation in the most disgusting way possible. The Sherrif deserves a A+ and she deserves an F. SMH.
I completely disagree with you rating for the sheriff. This guy is corrupt as hell and I have lived there. You have this entire incident wrong.
If the supreme court claims a person can be foul and abusive it is wrong
Those deputies definitely saved the Sheriff although what she said was not only out of line, but her volume was annoying right off the bat. Just because you are louder does not make you right. I don't know what is up with people screaming out their ideas over what they think that their rights are like if they are louder they are right, especially with females it seems, IMO. Honestly, she is lucky that it was a sheriff she said that too, because a civilian may have put their hands on her for such a gross statement after she was rude and hostile raising tensions. and to be honest, even though, outside of self defense, I don't believe in putting hands to a woman, for a situation like this, part of me would feel like "you reap what you sew." I give the sheriff a lot of credit for not going there and listening to his deputies. there is a huge difference between a 1st amendment auditor and someone who constantly baits officials into doing something wrong. and this is all from the video. I don't know what has transpired between them before this. but her tactics to me seem just gross. again IMO.
GOP loves to hold "private" meetings in publicly funded buildings -- instead of getting their private usage of the public buildings approved (which may require payment).
has this woman ever not been invited to a birthday party even though her friends were
anyway that was a cruel, cruel thing to say just because you didn't get to be in a meeting. she owes a HUGE apology to that man.
only a person who's never lost a thing in her life would think that was a REMOTELY acceptable thing to say. i'm shocked a person who would say something like that has a single friend in the world. shame on her.