@@wayoming3453 Planing to go for 8800XT, for Linux AMD is indeed better for gaming at moment - nvidia on linux its wasted perf. (aside from cuda stuff, that works great) and worse gaming drivers. Aside from better price/perf...I still wished the perf/watt would be on par with nvidia tho.
@@wayoming3453”They” are clowns of the pc community. They would buy up bath water if Nvidia was selling it, and say it’s better than AMD fountain water.
Yeah, the "RX 7800 XT" - which really should have been called RX 7700 (non-"XT") - blows it out of the water. 256-bit + PCIe 16x, instead of the shitty 128-bit + PCIe 8x that Nvidia offers for the same money. PATHETIC. It gives you RTX 3080 level performance - which is better than the 4070 (which itself is a 4060 in disguise). Thing is, it's only 5% better than the RX 6800 XT. Which you can find for cheaper. Both Nvidia and AMD have shifted their tiers this generation.
Another issue with not having enough VRAM is that it prevents textures from fully load, resulting in blurry textures. Something that the numbers do not show.
depends on the game and texture settings. But usually when vram is a factor its better to keep high textures and lower something else down because thats the setting you're gonna notice the most
I've done testing in a few games and I've noticed there's a lot of games that have issues with pop in and loading shadows/textures. In all cases it wasnt a vram issue. I tried all of them with the lowest possible settings and I still got the same results. I've also been looking at footage from consoles and it's just a universal issue in modern gaming.
@@Wobbothe3rd Depends on the game. Halo infinite would just say no and look like a 240p mess. But that's why that game is dead, despite having the BEST forge/firefight modes out of them all.
I have bought many cards from this generation 4060,4070,4090,7900 xtx. You can play 4k 60 fps with a 4060 8GB in most games with upscaling and setting adjustments. Dont be tricked into spending out of your budget by youtube videos to play at higher resolutions. If you want very high frame rates at any resoluiton thats a different story that will cost you money. I would rather watch you do a break down live of what lower end cards can really do in the real world scenarios. Bottom line if you have a 4k TV 60 fps you dont have to spend 1000-1700 to game that is just not fact.
Finally someone smart, i bought the Asus 4060 and it can run crew2, sw bf2 and bf2042 at 4k high, it's just low fps if people care about that, it doesn't lag and it goes around 62 degree
Weird now 60 fps considering as low fps with high-ultra settings :) Until 2 days ago i was playing CP2077 on low settings+fsr+fg 35fps And now with 4060ti ultra+dlssQ+fg 80-100fps. And playing at4K with 50-60fps is low fps ??!! Haha cmon. I got High+DLSSbalanced+FG 200+fps OMG!!! It's like a dream. I bought a computer with this card for 24k TL. 7800xt computers 33k, 4060 computers are between 21-30k TL. I am so glad to have this card.
In Germany the 4060 Ti 8GB costs ~349€ and 16GB drops from ~450€ to ~405€ (inclusive 19% VAT). So they are currently much cheaper than in the United States. But I think I will wait for a RTX 5060 (Ti) and AMD 9n00X3D. I'm using a EVGA RTX 3060 12 GB UV&OC / Intel i7-6850K.
@@zdspider6778 What do you mean when you say it should be called 4050? It doesn't matter what it's called. It's the weakest low-end GPU which means it's designed for 1080p or higher if you don't mind fewer fps or lowering settings.
Contemplated getting a 4060, Ti or otherwise, to use as an eGPU, but then realized that running out of VRAM on the already constrained bandwidth of the USB4 link could choke performance even more, and I wasn't about to splash out on the 16GB version. Went with a secondhand 6700XT instead and it's worked out well.
7800 XT uses more than 100 watts than 4060ti 16gb. This is a huge consideration for those who may not have the strongest power supply, or like me just don't want my room to get too hot, not to mention the costs for power. No one seems to care about performance per watt, where the 4060 series, even the 4060 ti 16GB, really shines.
IMO there is only 2 good 40 series card . 4070ti super . and 4090. 4070ti super is close to 4080 super performane, but is 200+ usd less and has 16gb . and the 4090 is the best on the market for those with deep pockets .. 4070 super is held back with 12gb
@@snakeinabox7220yeah no point in buying nvidia unless you’re considering those 2 cards, could probably make a case for 4080s but anything below that is just wasting miney
@@exocleats6937 i got a 7800xt on Macedonia launch . If i was buying a gpy now .the 7800gre is 50usd more after Tax . I would buy that instead . Sucks that my contry didnt have good amd mother boards and was out if stock of 7700x . Bought a 13700kf . Big mistake .hope it doesnt die , i got good cooling , downclocked it . And its not being pusshed to 100% often .so far over a year and its stable. Dont know how long thay will remain .
For people having 4060 Ti 8 GB card.. Just keep textures in High or sometimes medium ..... U will have enough VRAM to run game @ max settings 1440p, DLSS Q... I am not facing any VRAM issue with my RTX 4060 ti.. I just lower texture settings to High in all games... Only games I used Texture medium was Horizon FW and GOW Ragnarök
Finally smart person, gaymers became too stupid and self-centric. If your work depending on memory, your only closest choice is 3090/4080, for example in Redshift render recommended minimum is 8gb, 12gb is good but sometimes not enough and 16gb is perfectly balanced for the price. 4090 is only 3 times faster then 4060ti 16gb but 5 times more expensive, if you dont need 24gb, you can build small render farm on 4060ti to match performance of 4090 and it will be cheaper or spend saved money on cloud render farms.
I live in a area with a great used market and finding a used 3090 for THE PRICE OF 4060TI($420+) is a total pipe dream dont get your hopes up. @@BojanSusic-qi4qn
i have a budget build with a rtx 4060 ti 8 gb. i mostly play at 1080 p (that's what my monitors support), & i don't game for more than 2 hours. 8gb serves me well. if i ever get a better monitor, i will upgrade my gpu.
@@LprogressivesANDliberals Gaming on a 24-25inch monitor is optimal so 1080p is what you will be looking for and a 4060 which is cheaper will do everything you need. Even a 3060 will perform great.
That’s one big issue with Radeon based gpus is you cat get compact sized versions like you can with Nvidia. Many of Radeons good performing GPUs are generally ~310-335mm whereas the Nvidia offerings are down to ~200-240mm
You're getting _significantly_ less GPU for the money with Nvidia. 😐 The last great GPU that Nvidia made was the GTX 1080 Ti: 11GB VRAM when the norm was 8GB, 352-bit, GP102 (lower is better) not AD103 or 104, a buttload of CUDA cores (at that time), and for $699. And AMD did the same thing as Nvidia. The "RX 7900 XT" should have been called the RX 7800 (non-"XT"), the "RX 7800 XT" should have been called the RX 7700 (non-"XT") and so on. It's truly a bad time to buy a GPU...... The AI bubble can't burst soon enough. And I'm not counting on Intel GPUs to save us. Intel are scumbags.
@@zdspider6778 Yes, they did this with the naming, but at the same time MSRP they made the GPU's cheaper (6800xt was 649USD, 7800xt was 499USD), while nvidia just made their card with the same price, even though 4060 should be named 4050...
I think that depends on the comparison. My 6600 is quite short, two slots amd no low profile. The comparisons Daniel makes with some AMD cards are based on price and can lead to higher tier cards with much higher power consumption.
Been pointing out AMDs lack of SFF gpus too. There should be at least a 7700xt at 245mm or less. You can get a MSI 4070 ti super or Zotac 4070 super at 245mm even
@starsailor751 Yeah, but I do recommend buying only from stores you trust. Me too saw a deal of a 4060 Ti 8GB for $199 but I did not have the courage to try it out hahahah did not know the reputation of the store, too risky for me
There are current segments of the GPU market where AMD isn't a particularly convincing competition to Nvidia, but if there's one where it shines the most, it's definitely when competing against the 4060ti lineup
It’s really funny how ppl are saying that 4060ti is over priced when the 3060ti only had 8gb of vram and cost 400$ msrp now the 4060ti has 16gb of vram and cost 430$ and has frame gen and Lower power draw and is 15% more powerful
3060 Ti released 4 years ago. At the time the 3060 Ti had equal or better performance compared to the 2080, for half the cost. 4060 Ti released 1 year ago. At the time the 4060 Ti had a "15% performance increase" over the 3060 Ti for the same msrp* *(3060Ti had dropped in actual price to ~330 by this time so you were actually getting +15% performance for +35% price)
15% more power is very far from enough to justify upgrading. In 2 years games requirements increase much more than 15% which means that while in previous gen 3060 Ti could have been enough, 4060 Ti won't be for the same settings and resolution. Frame Generation is supposed to be used to boost already high fps.
I sometimes get asked by acquaintances what GPU to buy, and I ask what they're planning to do with their PC. Hearing their answer, about 90% of the time I confidently recommend an AMD graphics card. I have never once recommended any flavor of 4060.
Nobody wants an AMD GPU. Steam Hardware Surveys clearly show that. AMD GPUs aren't meant for Gaming, they're meant for Crypto Mining. Nvidia GPUs are meant for Gaming. The only Hardware AMD makes that's good for Gaming are their CPUs. Ryzen CPUs always outclass Intel CPUs.
@@Dark-Glaive The Steam survey reflects what people have, not what they want or what they should have. Let's keep that distinction at the fore. Many gamers buy Nvidia not because they do their research and conclude that Nvidia is better; rather, they buy Nvidia because their gaming buddies have Nvidia and hate on AMD. In other words, they buy Nvidia to avoid being made fun of. In truth, AMD GPUs outperform Nvidia GPUs in gaming rasterization at every price point at which they compete, sometimes by a lot. They also have as much or often a lot more VRAM, which is good for high-settings gaming. So the claim they aren't good for gaming is objectively incorrect.
@@rangersmith4652 AMD GPUs are weaker by a margin of 3%-10%. Worse 3D Rendering and Rasterization. Cranking up Settings on AMD drastically reduces frames. Nvidia can handle VRAM overflow if Cranking up Settings causes the VRAM to pass the allotted pool. The only thing Nvidia GPUs are lacking in is the VRAM. But if you're buying an RTX 4060, you shouldn't be expecting anything crazier than an RTX 2070 Super with a few new technological improvements. Ray-Tracing on a 4060 is leaps and bounds better than Ray-Tracing on a 2070 Super. 4060 also features new Architecture with DLSS 3.0/3.1 to allow for Frame Generation. The 2070 Super does not. If you're fine with Xbox Series X level Graphics but with a little extra, then an RTX 4060 is exactly that. Also we're talking about Budget Cards here. When the 2070 Super came out, it was retailing for around $600 and now the 4060 can do everything a 2070 Super can and then some for only $300.
All NVIDIA had to do was duplicate the success of the RTX 3060 by releasing the RTX 4060 with 12GB. But no, they were afraid that would cut into their RTX 4070 sales. Instead they gave us 3 cards priced so terribly we're forced to the RTX 4070 to get value.
You had us in the first half. The "4070" doesn't offer "value". It's a 60-class in disguise, sold for 80-class money. 😠 *The "real" 4070 costs $800 now.* How tf did we get from $329 and $379 (GTX 970 and GTX 1070) to $800? 😐 Nvidia done fucked up. *16GB + 256-bit.* That was all we asked for and they couldn't deliver. And they won't deliver even with the 5000 series if the leaks are true. It's gonna be another skip generation. I can't wait to skip it!
As the 3060 was the odd one concerning RAM size Nvidia could have built the 60 with 8GB and the Ti with 10GB or something like that. Now it looks like an upselling attempt to get either the 60 or push people right to the 70.
It's genius though, rig their low end gpus so that people get turn off by them, and release xx70 except this time you bump up the msrp by $100 more than previous gen, profits
@@tomthomas3499 I bought a 4060 but I'm not dumb like the average TH-cam commenter and understand I bought a card meant for 1080 gaming and not 1440/4k gaming.
for me the real value of rtx 4060s and even 4070 is their power draw, especially for a compact build, paried with a power efficiency monster like 7800X3D, good case airflow and GPU undervolt, it's even possible to run at an acceptable temp with no GPU fans. A while back I remember someone in China tested 4070 with no fans, undervolted to about 100W, still retaining 75-80% stock performance while staying under 80C
@@MarcinTrybus I'm pretty sure it doesnt work like that, AMD GPUs in general require much more power to deliver performance. 4060Ti TDP is 165W while 7800XT TDP is 263W, for 7800XT to be limited to 120W, you might not even get half of its stock performance
I run AFMF2 with an undervolt/underclock, and it's great. Easy to 240 FPS cap at my native resolution, and keep temps down in this rough Summer. I plan to repaste with PTM 7950 (or better) soon, too.
Hi Daniel, I've been trying to Benchmark my own newly built PC using MSI Afterburner. I can't seem to get few things started. Such as starting and pausing the benchmark and also getting 0.1% 0.01% lows to actually run, they are stuck at 1%. Could you make a video how to benchmark games on newly built PC using Afterburner?
In games like Ghost of tsushima where both 4060 Ti cards handled max 1440p settings equally, I wish you would've tried going up to 4k and/or comparing frame generation. Maybe one of the cards would handle 4k with dlss and framegen no problem where the other cards would fail completely? I don't know.
I can run Cyberpunk at 4k, 80fps with the 4060 ti 16gb, an overclocked 4.5mhz 5700g at high settings. Albeit I have a 1080p monitor that has the option for 4k. Only issue I have is the cpu can get hot up to 80+ degrees, but I only have a wraith stealth cooler. Definitely need better cooling but that’s about it. DO NOT GET FOOLED by these people saying you need to spend more money because of this and that, get what’s best for you and your budget.
I've been a long time nvidia gpu user and my choice was the 4060ti 16gb but the price to performance is ridiculous, I end up buying the Sapphire nitro+ 7700XT
I wanted to get 7700XT but got 4060 Ti instead, when playing Cyberpunk just using DLSS so performance is even higher than 7800XT. FSR is awful, i would never use it.
So which one shouls I get? I'll be playing on FHD 1080p and I'm between the 4060 and 4060 ti 8gb and im wondering do i really need to spend the extra money on the the small extra bit perfomance or no?
@Fronioll9973 depends on the game, but the 6650xt and 7600xt are generally faster at raster performance than any of the 4060 family of cards. I agree the 6750xt is a good card, but they are hard to find nowadays. However the best $300 card right now is the 6800, but it's also pretty hard to find.
Every single person in this comment section is tripping. Go to the used market and grab a RX 6800 or something like that. Going Nvidia in this price segment doesn't make sense, since the cards are so weak that using ray tracing frame gen doesn't properly work.
The 60 class should have never been called RTX it is actually very misleading to someone who thinks that rt would be a good feature of this card. Just get a rx 6800.
YEAH? Well what about VIDEO EDITING? And AMD have BAD DRIVERS! And their cards fricken EXPLODE killing your entire FAMILY and maybe even the NEIGHBOURS!
The 4060 does better at RT than the 6800 you liar. This is the new narrative all the AMD shills are going with -"60 class can't do RT so please ignore AMDS MASSIVE DISADVANTAGE", it's a LIE. The 4060 does RT better than a 2080. If you think a 2080 didn't deserve to be named RTX you're just lying.
@@thunderp1719 Mate what are you smoking? A fish is not very good at riding a bicycle, but it's better than a BEETLE! The 4060 cannot even run modern games, on day one of the cards release, at 1080p (a resolution from 2008) at max settings without dipping into the mid 40fps range. And here you are, saying RTX works on a 4060 at any kind of level! :D MAYBE if you upscale from 600p, a resolution from 1998, and use frame generation and medium settings in the game ... THEN MAYBE you can see 60fps. But thats what we call "polishing a turd".
@@raid1010 Hey, Well if you're interested in building a PC, at least you clearly know where to get good info from, and that's a great first step. If you're looking to get your best bang for your buck, it's really not an easy thing to get into, simply because there's no simple answer to most questions, it mostly boils down to what you prefer and how much value you give to some pros and some cons. At least, currently, I can confidently tell you, do not get an Intel 13th and 14th gen CPU. Otherwise, besides Owen right here, I can recommend Gamers Nexus and Hardware Unboxed for good comparisons, and if you need a simple but reliable comparer of GPU, use Techpowerup. AVOID LinusTechTips and UserBenchmarks, they're absolute trash. Otherwise, if you got more questions, I'll be happy to help
if 50 series comes out, the 16 gb 4060 Ti will become the best value one with cuda cores, cause the leaks says the 5060 will be more expensive than 4060, and it will come with 8 GB
The tragedy is that a xx60 series card used to be enough in 90% of the games I play(ed), including flight-sims. Anyone remember the GTX 260 or 460? Especially the 260 offered incredible performance in its day - but you didn't have to have a talk with your bank-manager if you were eyeing one. I bought a 260 in 2008 or so for ~€250, which is about €360 in today's money. But the card's performance, in its day, was more on the level of what today's 4070 delivers. And so these days, I consider the 4070 as the entry-level card for "serious" gamers - for which we have to pay through the nose. €500 to €600 used to be "people who spend that much on a GPU are nuts!"-territory for me. Today, it's the price of entry, I suppose. Seems that other than the 4090, everything else got downgraded a tier in performance or upgraded a tier in name - whichever description one prefers. And speaking of names: It seems that Nvidia of 2024 see tiers more like labels that signify how much they will charge you for the card - not as an indication as to what kind of performance the card will deliver. 4060 is a joke, IMO, as is the fact that they'll up-sell you on the 4060 Ti if you want the full fat 16 GB version. I'd usually suggest waiting for 50xx to roll around, but I don't have high hopes that Nvidia will change their ways with the new gen.
i have intel cpu, im leaning towards nvidia only because i do editing for a living and these cards are the only ones that fits my budget. need those features that radeon doesn't have
Really ? Lets talk about raytracing for 3060ti and 4060ti ? I am sure have big different fps. Yeah, you are true 3060 ti almost same performance 4060 ti without raytracing. People' answer naaaah with raytracing, but fact raytracing is sooo beautiful😄
@@irsyadamk let's be real you're not gonna have "sooo beautiful" ray tracing on 4060 ti neither, full path tracing will crush that thing. If you're not going for the best quality ray tracing then don't tell me it's "sooo beautiful", low to mid quality ray tracing does not look good. Emphasizing raytracing performance on mid range cards is point less, because there isn't much to begin with.
@@impc8265 sorry, i enjoyed that thing because more stable raytracing performance, more quality for record on av1 encode, and dont forget, 160w vs 200w ? Just 40w different but really save money electricity bill for long periode usage. So pathentic fact for you
Nice comparison video Great info on simple adjustments to make modern games playable on these GPUs. Great summary of AMD options that might be better for people who are just gaming.
In this tier, Amd has a better vlaue option in all cases except that one you describe for production work with the 16gb ti. Nvidia card owner here, but whoever gets a 4060ti 16gb for gaming instead of a 7800xt is insane. No brainer get that 7800xt.
I’m honestly surprised by small the delta is between the two Ti cards. Getting an 8gig version for less than 370 bucks feels like an okay deal. Whereas even with 16gb, no 4060 ti card feels like a good deal, when it’s just a small stretch to a 4070
Somehow ppl always forget that pricing can vary around the globe. For me it's like 450-600 bucks for 60ti 16gb depending of the model and marketplace vs 850-1000$ for non ti 4070 with 12gb. Paying double the price for 20-30% performance with questionable vram margin seems rather like a huge leap not stretch and a terrible deal overall. And going for smt like 70ti super that will surely be very much futureproof is like 1200$.
I got my girlfriend 4070 super 12gb for 560$ and its just because 7900 GRE was not available in white color, but to thing 4060 16gb costs only 100$ less is absurd
Rtx 4060 /ti is a good full HD card for casual gamers. The RTX 16GB version should also be partially suitable for WQHD. For WQHD I think the Rtx 4070 is a good choice. I would buy the 4080 for 4K imho
It SHOULD be, but nvidia won't lower prices, since people still buy these horrible products at these prices. I was able to get a 7800xt for less than a 4060ti 16gb price, and it was easily the best purchase and option as it was just barely more than a 4060ti 8gb price
The 4060 ti is not really designed to play 4k. Its a 1040p card at best if you want around 80-120 fps using DLSS. For 1440p it really depends on games and you get like 50 - 70 fps using DLSS.
man i had a choice between 4060 8GB and 3060 12 GB for pretty much same price, after alot of internal conflict i took the 4060 couse i thought it would be better for 1080p60fps, but yeah each time you make these vids about VRAM, it makes me depressed. Putting Texture resolution from Ultra to high is not a big deal for me since when you look at comparision vids you can bearly tell the diffrence between thoes. but yeah, it would be nice if 4060 had 12 GB of VRAM.
Very objective, this is really helpful to decide, thanks a lot! That's the point, GPUs with more VRAM are more focused on productivity. 80% of the games in this benchmark are not to my liking, for the games I play the RTX 4060 Ti 8Gb would be more than enough for me for 5 more years.
The gpus that make sense to buy are as follows: $180 - 6600 xt - 8g $280 - 6750 xt - 12g $330 - 6800 - 16g $400 - 7800 xt - 16g $500 - 4070 - 12g $800 - 4070 ❤ ti super or the xt (+16g) $1000 - 4080 super or xtx. (+16g) $47,639,629,658 - 4090 (24g) I am probably a lil off.. this was from memory. CPU choice is simple.. 7700x or 7800x3d.
@@prashantmishra9985 that is why I did not include the super or the TI. 4070 is the least egregious 12gb GPU. It should have 16gig but definitely better than paying $750 for a 12gb GPU.
that's US prices which are very special...amd gpus are always under msrp. It's not like that in europe, in europe it's +30%to the prices you said on every amd gpu aside the 6600 xt : 500€ XXD and +5-10% on nvidia gpus. I guess in asia, south america and so on the prices are very different. So when you talk with an european and he says that a nvidia gpu is a better value : he's not saying nonsense.
considering there is no old gen 6000 series amd gpu available, we don't have a GPU untill we spend on 7700xt. Standing ovation to both Nvidea and AMD. I will buy RX7600 for Rs. 22,500 inr and overclock it.
@@TheKims82 I know that, but many people just look how they get higer fps and do not think input/output lag at all. I think Daniel should tell especially to beginners how input/output lag affect different games.
The Last Descendant was going down to 40fps at 1440p on my 4060, so I decided to head to Microcenter, and my two $400 options were a 4060Ti 8gb, or a 6800XT. ...I mean, I say options, but... ANYWAYS, DLSS Quality, we're capped at 120 now high/max. Thanks AMD
Here in Chile the cheapest 4060 and 4060 Ti have a diference of 31,81%. And the 7800 XT is just 7,58% cheaper than de 4070 and 15% more expensive than the 4060 TI 16GB. The 4070 is 53% more expensive than the 4060 ti 8gb. For me 4060 Ti 8GB is the way to go.
I am new to newer pc gaming. I bought a Ibuypower i5 with a 4060 so I could okay helldivers 2 and forever winter. I paid 699 for the pc. Wish I had waited because Walmart is having a sale on a Ibuypower with a ryzen 7 and a 4070 for $999
Im surprised nvidia hasnt used their low vram amounts as an excuse to make it seem like they wanna make it less attractive for ai farms and super computers.
I did that mistake. Now I am pushing my 4060 ti 8gb on eBay and go for 7700xt or 7800xt. That was my fault I was fool and fall for brand with disregard for real word numbers. I am so embarrassed. mistakes cost 🤑.
I don't get it how some games can have really good textures with low VRAM usage, but some look like crap. Take for example Call of Duty or Cyberpunk, they look fine with 8GB, but some other games make you uninstall.
The real value of the 4060ti 16gb is for users who use AI. Its the cheapest gpu that has that much vram and cuda. I also helps that it sips power compared to higher vram nvidia cards.
The 16GB variant should never exist; instead, the Ti should have 12GB, which would have justified the 25% higher price compared to the normal 4060 8GB. I personally bought the normal 4060 because I'm only interested in 1080p High settings. If I want to play 4K Ultra with high fps in the future, then I would go for the upcoming RTX 5080 and never worry about performance ever again. 1440 sucks for me because i also play alot of older games which looks just wrong on 1440p. 1080p on the other hand can easily be upscaled to 4k.
@@sensei_... It's not a scam at all. First of all u can get nvidia for cheaper prices online and secondly not everyone lives in the usa or Europe where prices are super high. Here in India in good offline markets u can get really good deals . Like a 4060 cheaper than 7600xt , 4070 super only 50-60usd more than 7900 gre , rtx 4080 super cheaper than 7900 xtx . Like my cousin's friend got a 4080 super 140 usd cheaper than 7900xtx lmao . And in the era of upscaling there is no way I am picking fsr over dlss like that's common sense , u get tons of features in nvidia and u are forgetting about power draw . It saves a good amount of money per month due to less power draw .
4060ti is still the best . for mediul gaming at 1080p . 8 gb of vram is already low for 2024 . my last Gpu had 4 gb vram . my present gpu has 8 gb vram . my future gpu will have 16 gb vram .
IF THE 5060 IS 8GB DONT BUY IT.
I would seriously laugh if it's actually 8GB, like 8GB in 2025 would be insane!
@@masterlee1988 so far this is what the leaks say.
@@arkgaharandan5881 Oh man, it could actually be real? That's even more concerning.
Anything with 8 GB VRAM above 200 $ should be avoided like plague.
It annoys me how people defend the 4060’s. Complete clowns of the pc community that enable Nvidia to make such decisions.
Is just crazy that the 7800xt cost the same as the 4060ti 16gb
But Nvidia is better ... they say
@@wayoming3453 Planing to go for 8800XT, for Linux AMD is indeed better for gaming at moment - nvidia on linux its wasted perf. (aside from cuda stuff, that works great) and worse gaming drivers. Aside from better price/perf...I still wished the perf/watt would be on par with nvidia tho.
@@wayoming3453”They” are clowns of the pc community. They would buy up bath water if Nvidia was selling it, and say it’s better than AMD fountain water.
Yeah, the "RX 7800 XT" - which really should have been called RX 7700 (non-"XT") - blows it out of the water. 256-bit + PCIe 16x, instead of the shitty 128-bit + PCIe 8x that Nvidia offers for the same money. PATHETIC.
It gives you RTX 3080 level performance - which is better than the 4070 (which itself is a 4060 in disguise).
Thing is, it's only 5% better than the RX 6800 XT. Which you can find for cheaper.
Both Nvidia and AMD have shifted their tiers this generation.
@@zdspider6778YAP
remember how the 3060ti was marketed as a 1440p card......Pepperidge farms remembers
Honestly at this performance-point, you could have added the 3060Ti's and 3070's to the mix.
Another issue with not having enough VRAM is that it prevents textures from fully load, resulting in blurry textures. Something that the numbers do not show.
Bullshit. You can always lower the texture streaming.
Textures cycling, HUB did a test and found that some games indeed do that, for ex Hogwarts Legacy, Forspoken, and Halo
depends on the game and texture settings. But usually when vram is a factor its better to keep high textures and lower something else down because thats the setting you're gonna notice the most
I've done testing in a few games and I've noticed there's a lot of games that have issues with pop in and loading shadows/textures.
In all cases it wasnt a vram issue. I tried all of them with the lowest possible settings and I still got the same results.
I've also been looking at footage from consoles and it's just a universal issue in modern gaming.
@@Wobbothe3rd Depends on the game. Halo infinite would just say no and look like a 240p mess. But that's why that game is dead, despite having the BEST forge/firefight modes out of them all.
it would be nice if people still continue to consider the power efficiency... many, including us here has high cost in electricity
I have bought many cards from this generation 4060,4070,4090,7900 xtx. You can play 4k 60 fps with a 4060 8GB in most games with upscaling and setting adjustments. Dont be tricked into spending out of your budget by youtube videos to play at higher resolutions. If you want very high frame rates at any resoluiton thats a different story that will cost you money. I would rather watch you do a break down live of what lower end cards can really do in the real world scenarios. Bottom line if you have a 4k TV 60 fps you dont have to spend 1000-1700 to game that is just not fact.
Finally someone smart, i bought the Asus 4060 and it can run crew2, sw bf2 and bf2042 at 4k high, it's just low fps if people care about that, it doesn't lag and it goes around 62 degree
Weird now 60 fps considering as low fps with high-ultra settings :) Until 2 days ago i was playing CP2077 on low settings+fsr+fg 35fps And now with 4060ti ultra+dlssQ+fg 80-100fps. And playing at4K with 50-60fps is low fps ??!! Haha cmon. I got High+DLSSbalanced+FG 200+fps OMG!!! It's like a dream. I bought a computer with this card for 24k TL. 7800xt computers 33k, 4060 computers are between 21-30k TL. I am so glad to have this card.
I completely agree. I just got the 4060ti 8gb and I love it. Haven’t had a single issue.
I bought it now
Asus dual 4060
I feel like it's nice i loved it
@@S10hype is it ok if I play in 4k with 4060 ti and i5 12400f sir?
In Germany the 4060 Ti 8GB costs ~349€ and 16GB drops from ~450€ to ~405€ (inclusive 19% VAT). So they are currently much cheaper than in the United States.
But I think I will wait for a RTX 5060 (Ti) and AMD 9n00X3D. I'm using a EVGA RTX 3060 12 GB UV&OC / Intel i7-6850K.
You think 405 euro for what should have been called a 4050 is a good deal? 🤨
400 euro for PCIe 8x and 128-bit? 😠
@@zdspider6778 Where did he say it is a good deal ? He just mentioned that they are cheaper in Germany.
@@zdspider6778 What do you mean when you say it should be called 4050? It doesn't matter what it's called. It's the weakest low-end GPU which means it's designed for 1080p or higher if you don't mind fewer fps or lowering settings.
Contemplated getting a 4060, Ti or otherwise, to use as an eGPU, but then realized that running out of VRAM on the already constrained bandwidth of the USB4 link could choke performance even more, and I wasn't about to splash out on the 16GB version. Went with a secondhand 6700XT instead and it's worked out well.
What I like about RTX 4060 is low power consumption but more performance than RX 7600, and much cheaper than RX (Zotac).
7800 XT uses more than 100 watts than 4060ti 16gb. This is a huge consideration for those who may not have the strongest power supply, or like me just don't want my room to get too hot, not to mention the costs for power. No one seems to care about performance per watt, where the 4060 series, even the 4060 ti 16GB, really shines.
The lower tier of cards is designed solely to make you want to upgrade up. A 60 class card with more than 8gb of vram is a baffling price
IMO there is only 2 good 40 series card .
4070ti super . and 4090.
4070ti super is close to 4080 super performane, but is 200+ usd less and has 16gb .
and the 4090 is the best on the market for those with deep pockets ..
4070 super is held back with 12gb
4080 super isn't good?@@snakeinabox7220
@@snakeinabox7220yeah no point in buying nvidia unless you’re considering those 2 cards, could probably make a case for 4080s but anything below that is just wasting miney
@@exocleats6937 i got a 7800xt on Macedonia launch .
If i was buying a gpy now .the 7800gre is 50usd more after Tax . I would buy that instead .
Sucks that my contry didnt have good amd mother boards and was out if stock of 7700x .
Bought a 13700kf . Big mistake .hope it doesnt die , i got good cooling , downclocked it . And its not being pusshed to 100% often .so far over a year and its stable. Dont know how long thay will remain .
@@snakeinabox72204070 Super is a perfect 1080p powerhouse
For people having 4060 Ti 8 GB card.. Just keep textures in High or sometimes medium ..... U will have enough VRAM to run game @ max settings 1440p, DLSS Q... I am not facing any VRAM issue with my RTX 4060 ti.. I just lower texture settings to High in all games... Only games I used Texture medium was Horizon FW and GOW Ragnarök
Everyone reviewing 4060 ti 16gb wrong. It is not targeted at gamers it is for content creators who can't afford a 4080
Finally smart person, gaymers became too stupid and self-centric. If your work depending on memory, your only closest choice is 3090/4080, for example in Redshift render recommended minimum is 8gb, 12gb is good but sometimes not enough and 16gb is perfectly balanced for the price.
4090 is only 3 times faster then 4060ti 16gb but 5 times more expensive, if you dont need 24gb, you can build small render farm on 4060ti to match performance of 4090 and it will be cheaper or spend saved money on cloud render farms.
@@anthonynehoda2064 Funny thing is, you could find a used 3090 for 24gb vram which cost around the same as the 4060ti
I live in a area with a great used market and finding a used 3090 for THE PRICE OF 4060TI($420+) is a total pipe dream dont get your hopes up. @@BojanSusic-qi4qn
i have a budget build with a rtx 4060 ti 8 gb. i mostly play at 1080 p (that's what my monitors support), & i don't game for more than 2 hours. 8gb serves me well. if i ever get a better monitor, i will upgrade my gpu.
Thank you for your input! I am using to make a decision soon. Thanks
@@LprogressivesANDliberals Gaming on a 24-25inch monitor is optimal so 1080p is what you will be looking for and a 4060 which is cheaper will do everything you need. Even a 3060 will perform great.
That’s one big issue with Radeon based gpus is you cat get compact sized versions like you can with Nvidia. Many of Radeons good performing GPUs are generally ~310-335mm whereas the Nvidia offerings are down to ~200-240mm
You're getting _significantly_ less GPU for the money with Nvidia. 😐 The last great GPU that Nvidia made was the GTX 1080 Ti: 11GB VRAM when the norm was 8GB, 352-bit, GP102 (lower is better) not AD103 or 104, a buttload of CUDA cores (at that time), and for $699.
And AMD did the same thing as Nvidia. The "RX 7900 XT" should have been called the RX 7800 (non-"XT"), the "RX 7800 XT" should have been called the RX 7700 (non-"XT") and so on. It's truly a bad time to buy a GPU...... The AI bubble can't burst soon enough. And I'm not counting on Intel GPUs to save us. Intel are scumbags.
@@zdspider6778 Yes, they did this with the naming, but at the same time MSRP they made the GPU's cheaper (6800xt was 649USD, 7800xt was 499USD), while nvidia just made their card with the same price, even though 4060 should be named 4050...
I think that depends on the comparison. My 6600 is quite short, two slots amd no low profile.
The comparisons Daniel makes with some AMD cards are based on price and can lead to higher tier cards with much higher power consumption.
Been pointing out AMDs lack of SFF gpus too. There should be at least a 7700xt at 245mm or less. You can get a MSI 4070 ti super or Zotac 4070 super at 245mm even
@@zdspider6778 you flat ignored his point though
Bought mine 4060 Ti for $290 on a big sale. Could literally not have a better deal. The GPU was sealed and I bought it from a physical store
I saw one for $255 through online lol, it seems legit as it says that i have 7 days trial to test it to avoid getting scammed
@starsailor751 Yeah, but I do recommend buying only from stores you trust. Me too saw a deal of a 4060 Ti 8GB for $199 but I did not have the courage to try it out hahahah did not know the reputation of the store, too risky for me
When the 16 gigs matters, it doesn't matter.
263 w (rx 7800 xt) vs 156 w (rtx 460 ti)
As a wise man once said about AMD products:
Pros: Cheap
Cons: Cheap
There are current segments of the GPU market where AMD isn't a particularly convincing competition to Nvidia, but if there's one where it shines the most, it's definitely when competing against the 4060ti lineup
How is cheap supposed to be a con?
A clever man instead once said:
Pros: cheap
Cons: garbage FSR, less garbage but still garbage RT, no NVENC
An informed man once said:
Pros: cheap, higher performance: no need for FPS crutches like DLSS
Cons: cheap
It’s really funny how ppl are saying that 4060ti is over priced when the 3060ti only had 8gb of vram and cost 400$ msrp now the 4060ti has 16gb of vram and cost 430$ and has frame gen and Lower power draw and is 15% more powerful
People are dumb and they think they are buying a 60 series card for 1440+ ultra settings gameplay at high fps.
3060 Ti released 4 years ago. At the time the 3060 Ti had equal or better performance compared to the 2080, for half the cost.
4060 Ti released 1 year ago. At the time the 4060 Ti had a "15% performance increase" over the 3060 Ti for the same msrp*
*(3060Ti had dropped in actual price to ~330 by this time so you were actually getting +15% performance for +35% price)
15% more power is very far from enough to justify upgrading. In 2 years games requirements increase much more than 15% which means that while in previous gen 3060 Ti could have been enough, 4060 Ti won't be for the same settings and resolution. Frame Generation is supposed to be used to boost already high fps.
I sometimes get asked by acquaintances what GPU to buy, and I ask what they're planning to do with their PC. Hearing their answer, about 90% of the time I confidently recommend an AMD graphics card. I have never once recommended any flavor of 4060.
Could you please help me with building for the first time?
@@DalyRituals With selecting parts, I could. So could a lot of other people.
Nobody wants an AMD GPU. Steam Hardware Surveys clearly show that. AMD GPUs aren't meant for Gaming, they're meant for Crypto Mining. Nvidia GPUs are meant for Gaming. The only Hardware AMD makes that's good for Gaming are their CPUs. Ryzen CPUs always outclass Intel CPUs.
@@Dark-Glaive The Steam survey reflects what people have, not what they want or what they should have. Let's keep that distinction at the fore. Many gamers buy Nvidia not because they do their research and conclude that Nvidia is better; rather, they buy Nvidia because their gaming buddies have Nvidia and hate on AMD. In other words, they buy Nvidia to avoid being made fun of. In truth, AMD GPUs outperform Nvidia GPUs in gaming rasterization at every price point at which they compete, sometimes by a lot. They also have as much or often a lot more VRAM, which is good for high-settings gaming. So the claim they aren't good for gaming is objectively incorrect.
@@rangersmith4652 AMD GPUs are weaker by a margin of 3%-10%. Worse 3D Rendering and Rasterization. Cranking up Settings on AMD drastically reduces frames. Nvidia can handle VRAM overflow if Cranking up Settings causes the VRAM to pass the allotted pool. The only thing Nvidia GPUs are lacking in is the VRAM. But if you're buying an RTX 4060, you shouldn't be expecting anything crazier than an RTX 2070 Super with a few new technological improvements. Ray-Tracing on a 4060 is leaps and bounds better than Ray-Tracing on a 2070 Super. 4060 also features new Architecture with DLSS 3.0/3.1 to allow for Frame Generation. The 2070 Super does not. If you're fine with Xbox Series X level Graphics but with a little extra, then an RTX 4060 is exactly that. Also we're talking about Budget Cards here. When the 2070 Super came out, it was retailing for around $600 and now the 4060 can do everything a 2070 Super can and then some for only $300.
Rtx 4060 and rtx 4060 ti could be better if nvidia upgraded to super instead of upgrading rtx 4080 to super
Yeah it's odd that Nvidia didn't do Super versions of 4060 and 4060 Tis.
Hey Daniel! Do this with a RTX 3060 ti add-on.
So what do you recommend for 1080p gaming with low to medium settings
What website is that pc part picker?
I bought 4060ti for the same price as a 7600xt so for me it was kinda worth it
4060 ti is a competitor for 7700xt, so definitely yes.
I got mine for $15 on an amazon return store
I bought the 4060ti 16gb not for the max FPS but for the 1% low FPS
What type of RAM are you using on these tests DDR4 or 5?
He's on AM5 so definitely DDR5.
Irrelevant unless you're CPU-limited
All NVIDIA had to do was duplicate the success of the RTX 3060 by releasing the RTX 4060 with 12GB.
But no, they were afraid that would cut into their RTX 4070 sales.
Instead they gave us 3 cards priced so terribly we're forced to the RTX 4070 to get value.
Exactly, they knew what they were doing with that and honestly the 4070 is the minimum gpu that's worth it for the RTX 4000 series.
You had us in the first half.
The "4070" doesn't offer "value". It's a 60-class in disguise, sold for 80-class money. 😠
*The "real" 4070 costs $800 now.*
How tf did we get from $329 and $379 (GTX 970 and GTX 1070) to $800? 😐 Nvidia done fucked up. *16GB + 256-bit.* That was all we asked for and they couldn't deliver. And they won't deliver even with the 5000 series if the leaks are true. It's gonna be another skip generation. I can't wait to skip it!
As the 3060 was the odd one concerning RAM size Nvidia could have built the 60 with 8GB and the Ti with 10GB or something like that.
Now it looks like an upselling attempt to get either the 60 or push people right to the 70.
It's genius though, rig their low end gpus so that people get turn off by them, and release xx70 except this time you bump up the msrp by $100 more than previous gen, profits
@@tomthomas3499 I bought a 4060 but I'm not dumb like the average TH-cam commenter and understand I bought a card meant for 1080 gaming and not 1440/4k gaming.
for me the real value of rtx 4060s and even 4070 is their power draw, especially for a compact build, paried with a power efficiency monster like 7800X3D, good case airflow and GPU undervolt, it's even possible to run at an acceptable temp with no GPU fans.
A while back I remember someone in China tested 4070 with no fans, undervolted to about 100W, still retaining 75-80% stock performance while staying under 80C
Since you can buy an RX 7800 XT for the same price as the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and cut its power to 120 W you will have a faster card using less power.
@@MarcinTrybus I'm pretty sure it doesnt work like that, AMD GPUs in general require much more power to deliver performance. 4060Ti TDP is 165W while 7800XT TDP is 263W, for 7800XT to be limited to 120W, you might not even get half of its stock performance
I run AFMF2 with an undervolt/underclock, and it's great. Easy to 240 FPS cap at my native resolution, and keep temps down in this rough Summer. I plan to repaste with PTM 7950 (or better) soon, too.
@@cks2020693 its really not that black and white.....
@@MarcinTrybus you know magic works only in films, dreams, book, and anything that isn't real. and what you're saying is magic.:/
Best comparison I've seen by a mile.
I just upgraded from my reliable and rx 590 sapphire nitro+ to an rx 6800 xt old still but much better so far.
Hi Daniel, I've been trying to Benchmark my own newly built PC using MSI Afterburner. I can't seem to get few things started. Such as starting and pausing the benchmark and also getting 0.1% 0.01% lows to actually run, they are stuck at 1%. Could you make a video how to benchmark games on newly built PC using Afterburner?
I have i7 870 and 1650 so whatever I buy it's better by far lol... fact one I bought ryzen 9 5950x the build is coming together
You just helped me not to throw out my money for a ti version, awesome video, thanks!
In games like Ghost of tsushima where both 4060 Ti cards handled max 1440p settings equally, I wish you would've tried going up to 4k and/or comparing frame generation. Maybe one of the cards would handle 4k with dlss and framegen no problem where the other cards would fail completely? I don't know.
so what would you buy today for around the same price
Was planning to get the 4060ti 8gb to replace my 3060……but now I don’t know
Buy a rtx 7800xt
I can run Cyberpunk at 4k, 80fps with the 4060 ti 16gb, an overclocked 4.5mhz 5700g at high settings. Albeit I have a 1080p monitor that has the option for 4k. Only issue I have is the cpu can get hot up to 80+ degrees, but I only have a wraith stealth cooler. Definitely need better cooling but that’s about it. DO NOT GET FOOLED by these people saying you need to spend more money because of this and that, get what’s best for you and your budget.
I've been a long time nvidia gpu user and my choice was the 4060ti 16gb but the price to performance is ridiculous, I end up buying the Sapphire nitro+ 7700XT
I wanted to get 7700XT but got 4060 Ti instead, when playing Cyberpunk just using DLSS so performance is even higher than 7800XT. FSR is awful, i would never use it.
@@WinterLovelace yep, DLSS is superior
So which one shouls I get? I'll be playing on FHD 1080p and I'm between the 4060 and 4060 ti 8gb and im wondering do i really need to spend the extra money on the the small extra bit perfomance or no?
Get the 6650xt, or better yet the 7600xt 16gb. Faster cards than any of the Nvidia offerings at this price point.
@@IrisDude1that's worse
6650xt and 7600 have worse raster performance
Probably either get the 4060 ti or get a 6750xt which actually is a good option
@Fronioll9973 depends on the game, but the 6650xt and 7600xt are generally faster at raster performance than any of the 4060 family of cards. I agree the 6750xt is a good card, but they are hard to find nowadays. However the best $300 card right now is the 6800, but it's also pretty hard to find.
@@IrisDude1 lmao if 6800 is for 300 usd thars a really good deal
Every single person in this comment section is tripping.
Go to the used market and grab a RX 6800 or something like that.
Going Nvidia in this price segment doesn't make sense, since the cards are so weak that using ray tracing frame gen doesn't properly work.
The 60 class should have never been called RTX it is actually very misleading to someone who thinks that rt would be a good feature of this card. Just get a rx 6800.
exactly, rt becomes viable with 70 series
YEAH? Well what about VIDEO EDITING? And AMD have BAD DRIVERS! And their cards fricken EXPLODE killing your entire FAMILY and maybe even the NEIGHBOURS!
The 4060 does better at RT than the 6800 you liar. This is the new narrative all the AMD shills are going with -"60 class can't do RT so please ignore AMDS MASSIVE DISADVANTAGE", it's a LIE. The 4060 does RT better than a 2080. If you think a 2080 didn't deserve to be named RTX you're just lying.
RT quality is ok in 4060 compared to 3060. They're at acceptable levels
@@thunderp1719 Mate what are you smoking?
A fish is not very good at riding a bicycle, but it's better than a BEETLE!
The 4060 cannot even run modern games, on day one of the cards release, at 1080p (a resolution from 2008) at max settings without dipping into the mid 40fps range.
And here you are, saying RTX works on a 4060 at any kind of level! :D
MAYBE if you upscale from 600p, a resolution from 1998, and use frame generation and medium settings in the game ... THEN MAYBE you can see 60fps.
But thats what we call "polishing a turd".
Great comparison, thanks.
What's the website that's displaying the 'Choose a Vodeo Card'?
PCPartPicker
pcpartpicker ? I'm not asking this with condescendence, are you new to this?
@@samarkand1585 New? Blud Ive nvr ever built a pc b4, am mainly a laptop user
@@raid1010 Hey, Well if you're interested in building a PC, at least you clearly know where to get good info from, and that's a great first step. If you're looking to get your best bang for your buck, it's really not an easy thing to get into, simply because there's no simple answer to most questions, it mostly boils down to what you prefer and how much value you give to some pros and some cons. At least, currently, I can confidently tell you, do not get an Intel 13th and 14th gen CPU. Otherwise, besides Owen right here, I can recommend Gamers Nexus and Hardware Unboxed for good comparisons, and if you need a simple but reliable comparer of GPU, use Techpowerup. AVOID LinusTechTips and UserBenchmarks, they're absolute trash. Otherwise, if you got more questions, I'll be happy to help
Y’all isn’t it just wild that a model of the 4060 has the same vram of 16 gb as a 4080 super ☠️
if 50 series comes out, the 16 gb 4060 Ti will become the best value one with cuda cores, cause the leaks says the 5060 will be more expensive than 4060, and it will come with 8 GB
The tragedy is that a xx60 series card used to be enough in 90% of the games I play(ed), including flight-sims. Anyone remember the GTX 260 or 460? Especially the 260 offered incredible performance in its day - but you didn't have to have a talk with your bank-manager if you were eyeing one. I bought a 260 in 2008 or so for ~€250, which is about €360 in today's money. But the card's performance, in its day, was more on the level of what today's 4070 delivers.
And so these days, I consider the 4070 as the entry-level card for "serious" gamers - for which we have to pay through the nose. €500 to €600 used to be "people who spend that much on a GPU are nuts!"-territory for me. Today, it's the price of entry, I suppose. Seems that other than the 4090, everything else got downgraded a tier in performance or upgraded a tier in name - whichever description one prefers. And speaking of names: It seems that Nvidia of 2024 see tiers more like labels that signify how much they will charge you for the card - not as an indication as to what kind of performance the card will deliver. 4060 is a joke, IMO, as is the fact that they'll up-sell you on the 4060 Ti if you want the full fat 16 GB version.
I'd usually suggest waiting for 50xx to roll around, but I don't have high hopes that Nvidia will change their ways with the new gen.
i have intel cpu, im leaning towards nvidia only because i do editing for a living and these cards are the only ones that fits my budget. need those features that radeon doesn't have
if you include 3060ti you'll find that all three are shit
Did you really say it is being better than 4060 Tis?
Really ? Lets talk about raytracing for 3060ti and 4060ti ? I am sure have big different fps.
Yeah, you are true 3060 ti almost same performance 4060 ti without raytracing.
People' answer naaaah with raytracing, but fact raytracing is sooo beautiful😄
@@irsyadamk let's be real you're not gonna have "sooo beautiful" ray tracing on 4060 ti neither, full path tracing will crush that thing. If you're not going for the best quality ray tracing then don't tell me it's "sooo beautiful", low to mid quality ray tracing does not look good. Emphasizing raytracing performance on mid range cards is point less, because there isn't much to begin with.
@@impc8265 sorry, i enjoyed that thing because more stable raytracing performance, more quality for record on av1 encode, and dont forget, 160w vs 200w ? Just 40w different but really save money electricity bill for long periode usage. So pathentic fact for you
@@irsyadamk you make your choices lol, I'm not gonna even convince you
Nice comparison video
Great info on simple adjustments to make modern games playable on these GPUs.
Great summary of AMD options that might be better for people who are just gaming.
In this tier, Amd has a better vlaue option in all cases except that one you describe for production work with the 16gb ti. Nvidia card owner here, but whoever gets a 4060ti 16gb for gaming instead of a 7800xt is insane. No brainer get that 7800xt.
I just had a curri
I am planning to buy a graphic card
So should i buy the 4060ti 8gb Used for for $377
Or should i go for rx 7800xt 16gb new for $662
You should go with the 4060.
I noticed most games dont use more than 8gb of VRAM even when available... Those that do is where the 16gb ti shine
I’m honestly surprised by small the delta is between the two Ti cards. Getting an 8gig version for less than 370 bucks feels like an okay deal. Whereas even with 16gb, no 4060 ti card feels like a good deal, when it’s just a small stretch to a 4070
Somehow ppl always forget that pricing can vary around the globe. For me it's like 450-600 bucks for 60ti 16gb depending of the model and marketplace vs 850-1000$ for non ti 4070 with 12gb. Paying double the price for 20-30% performance with questionable vram margin seems rather like a huge leap not stretch and a terrible deal overall. And going for smt like 70ti super that will surely be very much futureproof is like 1200$.
would love a comparison of the 4060 ti 16gb vs 4070, ty
I found a 4060ti for $255, is it good? I might take it
I got my girlfriend 4070 super 12gb for 560$ and its just because 7900 GRE was not available in white color, but to thing 4060 16gb costs only 100$ less is absurd
Rtx 4060 /ti is a good full HD card for casual gamers.
The RTX 16GB version should also be partially suitable for WQHD.
For WQHD I think the Rtx 4070 is a good choice.
I would buy the 4080 for 4K imho
Finally, real comparison.
Thank you!
Why every youtuber putting different fps rate for same gpu and game?? Which is true is hard to believe
I see the Nvidia 4060 family is quite popular on this channel (watched at least 3 videos about it).
If the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB would cost $329 or lower, then it would be a little more appealing...
The 6800 still beats it
it has to be 299 at most, 4060 should be 229
@@KamilWyszynski-y3p Those prices would make a lot more sense, yeah.
It SHOULD be, but nvidia won't lower prices, since people still buy these horrible products at these prices. I was able to get a 7800xt for less than a 4060ti 16gb price, and it was easily the best purchase and option as it was just barely more than a 4060ti 8gb price
@@Riyozsunot in RT it doesn't, lol. AMD shills never quit.
it’s ok if I play in 4k with rtx 4060ti and i5 12400f?
The 4060 ti is not really designed to play 4k. Its a 1040p card at best if you want around 80-120 fps using DLSS. For 1440p it really depends on games and you get like 50 - 70 fps using DLSS.
@ ok thank you
Please consider adding the The First Descendant to your benchmarking games suite. Its a free to play UE5 engine online shooter. 👍
Niema na wykresie pobur mocy GPU cpu.jakie cpu?
man i had a choice between 4060 8GB and 3060 12 GB for pretty much same price, after alot of internal conflict i took the 4060 couse i thought it would be better for 1080p60fps, but yeah each time you make these vids about VRAM, it makes me depressed. Putting Texture resolution from Ultra to high is not a big deal for me since when you look at comparision vids you can bearly tell the diffrence between thoes. but yeah, it would be nice if 4060 had 12 GB of VRAM.
I have both a 3060 12gb and a 4060 8 gb and my 4060 is much better then my 3060.
Very objective, this is really helpful to decide, thanks a lot!
That's the point, GPUs with more VRAM are more focused on productivity. 80% of the games in this benchmark are not to my liking, for the games I play the RTX 4060 Ti 8Gb would be more than enough for me for 5 more years.
The gpus that make sense to buy are as follows:
$180 - 6600 xt - 8g
$280 - 6750 xt - 12g
$330 - 6800 - 16g
$400 - 7800 xt - 16g
$500 - 4070 - 12g
$800 - 4070 ❤ ti super or the xt (+16g)
$1000 - 4080 super or xtx. (+16g)
$47,639,629,658 - 4090 (24g)
I am probably a lil off.. this was from memory.
CPU choice is simple.. 7700x or 7800x3d.
Nah, not 4070 with its anemic 12 GB VRAM
@@prashantmishra9985 that is why I did not include the super or the TI. 4070 is the least egregious 12gb GPU. It should have 16gig but definitely better than paying $750 for a 12gb GPU.
that's US prices which are very special...amd gpus are always under msrp. It's not like that in europe, in europe it's +30%to the prices you said on every amd gpu aside the 6600 xt : 500€ XXD and +5-10% on nvidia gpus. I guess in asia, south america and so on the prices are very different. So when you talk with an european and he says that a nvidia gpu is a better value : he's not saying nonsense.
At this point I’ll just wait for Nvidia and AMD to release the next gen cards later this year and early next year
just get a 7500f and RX6800 and call it good as long as you don't play crap AAAA games...
Your opinion on 4070ti 16gb worth in Australia is $1300 and a 4080 $1500 or higher . It just doesn't make sense to me.
Only thing missing is 4K DLSS performance test.
If the ti had 12 GB at that price point, it would be a solid value.
considering there is no old gen 6000 series amd gpu available, we don't have a GPU untill we spend on 7700xt. Standing ovation to both Nvidea and AMD. I will buy RX7600 for Rs. 22,500 inr and overclock it.
I hope u some day show us best settings for low inputlags and tell us why it is important in difrent games.
The lower the settings the lower the input lag usually.
@@TheKims82 I know that, but many people just look how they get higer fps and do not think input/output lag at all. I think Daniel should tell especially to beginners how input/output lag affect different games.
Plz compare the 4060 ti and rx 7600xt
The Last Descendant was going down to 40fps at 1440p on my 4060, so I decided to head to Microcenter, and my two $400 options were a 4060Ti 8gb, or a 6800XT.
...I mean, I say options, but... ANYWAYS, DLSS Quality, we're capped at 120 now high/max. Thanks AMD
lmao why would you buy a 4060 for 1440+ gaming 🤣🤣
Here in Chile the cheapest 4060 and 4060 Ti have a diference of 31,81%. And the 7800 XT is just 7,58% cheaper than de 4070 and 15% more expensive than the 4060 TI 16GB. The 4070 is 53% more expensive than the 4060 ti 8gb. For me 4060 Ti 8GB is the way to go.
I am new to newer pc gaming. I bought a Ibuypower i5 with a 4060 so I could okay helldivers 2 and forever winter. I paid 699 for the pc. Wish I had waited because Walmart is having a sale on a Ibuypower with a ryzen 7 and a 4070 for $999
5:03 🤣🤣🤣
Im surprised nvidia hasnt used their low vram amounts as an excuse to make it seem like they wanna make it less attractive for ai farms and super computers.
I did that mistake. Now I am pushing my 4060 ti 8gb on eBay and go for 7700xt or 7800xt.
That was my fault I was fool and fall for brand with disregard for real word numbers.
I am so embarrassed. mistakes cost 🤑.
Bought a 4080 when it first came out.. after taxes 1350$… now it’s below 800$ on the used market lol. I feel you
I don't get it how some games can have really good textures with low VRAM usage, but some look like crap.
Take for example Call of Duty or Cyberpunk, they look fine with 8GB, but some other games make you uninstall.
The real value of the 4060ti 16gb is for users who use AI. Its the cheapest gpu that has that much vram and cuda. I also helps that it sips power compared to higher vram nvidia cards.
If the 4060 had 12GB VRAM it would be the perfect card for £300
I bought a 16gb nvidia gpu. The only nvidia gpu that makes any sense. Now its time to upgrade the cpu from 5600x. One day soon.
Might as well buy a console over these budget* graphics cards. 🤣
If you want todo AI images.. go 16GB, i run out of memory often :)
The 16GB variant should never exist; instead, the Ti should have 12GB, which would have justified the 25% higher price compared to the normal 4060 8GB. I personally bought the normal 4060 because I'm only interested in 1080p High settings. If I want to play 4K Ultra with high fps in the future, then I would go for the upcoming RTX 5080 and never worry about performance ever again. 1440 sucks for me because i also play alot of older games which looks just wrong on 1440p. 1080p on the other hand can easily be upscaled to 4k.
AFMF 2?
So we're paying 30%/50% more for the TI versions for an extra 10-12fps increase. No thanks
lol I just Bought a brand new 4060ti 16gb for £380. hopefuly it will be enough for a couple of years
Should've given atleast 12gb on Ti cards
and the winner are rx 7700xt or under 300$ rx 7600 or 6650xt and 150$ arc 580 is not bad too
Short answer>Don't buy Nvidia.
Avg amd shill hating on nvidia
Don't buy this generation in this range of price*
@@Fronioll9973well if you care about price/performance nvidia is a scam unless ray tracing is absolutely essential for you
Buy shit amd instead
@@sensei_... It's not a scam at all. First of all u can get nvidia for cheaper prices online and secondly not everyone lives in the usa or Europe where prices are super high.
Here in India in good offline markets u can get really good deals . Like a 4060 cheaper than 7600xt , 4070 super only 50-60usd more than 7900 gre , rtx 4080 super cheaper than 7900 xtx . Like my cousin's friend got a 4080 super 140 usd cheaper than 7900xtx lmao . And in the era of upscaling there is no way I am picking fsr over dlss like that's common sense , u get tons of features in nvidia and u are forgetting about power draw . It saves a good amount of money per month due to less power draw .
4060ti is still the best . for mediul gaming at 1080p .
8 gb of vram is already low for 2024 .
my last Gpu had 4 gb vram . my present gpu has 8 gb vram . my future gpu will have 16 gb vram .
You are right. 4060 ti 16GB is targeting AI not gaming.
The 4060 is the only card that makes sense here, for those on a budget. The 4060 Tis are just there to upsell you on a 4070.
I pay 800$ for 16gb rtx4060ti version
should have made the 4070 S 16GB not the 4060 ti
16gb is very much needed