There... Isn't really any manipulation going on here... He places the magnets in different positions and tests... He does not however in any instance, manipulate, the magnets.
@@HoursFreeAOLsp you trying to define "manipulate" with the one definition that makes it sound like you are right here is kinda childish, not gonna lie. There are multiple definitions that I know for a fact that you saw when you just googled that and you chose not to copy/paste the secondary description because it proves you wrong. Just as you chose to leave out the fact that he isn't actually manipulating any tools (dials of any sort seeing as how to "manipulate" the tool you would have to be "fine tuning" it.) This guy in no instance does any fine tuning with or any other form of manipulation with these magnets. If he was manipulating them, he would have been changing the variables of the experiments that he was doing, for example: superconducting the magnets or something along those lines to MANIPULATE, and or FINE TUNE the magnets to get a SPECIFIC OUTCOME. He never does anything to the magnets that would alter their physical properties in some sense (like what happens when you manipulate the knob of your car stereo for instance, the knob rotates, and the digits chance, as such you are manipulating the dials) if he did, variables pertaining to the magnets specifically would have been being changed. How could have added a base and produced a static charge to see if the magnets became stronger, then he would have been manipulating them. You copy/pasting a specific definition that you CHOSE, doesn't make you right just because it "sounds" like it when you say it in your head. When you complete the first definition that YOU copy/pasted, it clearly defined the type of manipulation that it is referring to. I'm sure you noticed that though and just choice to manipulate the given situation to try and give yourself a leg up, full proper definition seen below for all you savvy dogs. verb 1. handle or control (a tool, mechanism, etc.), typically in a skillful manner. "he manipulated the dials of the set" Similar: operate handle work control use employ utilize 2. control or influence (a person or situation) cleverly, unfairly, or unscrupulously. "the masses were deceived and manipulated by a tiny group" Similar: exploit control influence use/turn to one's advantage maneuver engineer steer direct guide work orchestrate choreograph
@@Chag69420 I'm saying that the definition for manipulations clearly defined what has to be going on for something to be manipulated. There are NEVER any changing variables PERTAINING TO THE MAGNETS. IF THERE WERE VARIABLES BEING CHANGED PERTAINING TO THE MAGNETS, THEN YES THERE WOULD BE MANIPULATION OCCURING. BUT THERE ARE NO VARIABLES PERTAINING TO THE MAGNETS THEMSELVES BEING CHANGED. There is 0 manipulation going on to the magnets here :| end of story.
I love how you were able to determine from the datasheets what the magnets were originally intended for; how version 3 seemed to support that hypothesis, and how you managed to make it very interesting without having any official confirmation or official source footage. I also love the use of the iconography to illustrate the subject and the dangers involved. Very well done with minimal means; consistency is a powerful tool
This was fantastic!!!! More magnets please! I'm definitely showing my little brother. And definitely telling him to show his science teacher your videos. So wonderfully done. I'm showing this to as many people as I know. It's spectacular!!!
Brainiac75 XLnT Keep it up. The vid is not TOO LONG I would say it is long enough ! In other words I watched the entire video and gained knowledge that I did indeed benefit from. THANX Brainiac75 . Peace be with u my brother
Maybe, but it's a safety issue. Attraction is fully controllable and predictable. Repulsion is not - the magnets really want to turn around unless in a sturdy rig.
I would say repulsion can be easier to set up, put them on a transparent vertical tube so they're only to move up and down, place weights on the top repelling magnet and measure heights. I feel like this can be more qualitative, as the only things in this are gravity and the magnetic repulsion.
+Brainiac75 Instead of the pull test. you should have a controlled height 1mm below the paperclip and measure its pull force. Also, if possible, i would love to see how these magnets affect iron filings before and after combined. great vid.
hey, just wanted to point out a problem with the experiment at 5:00: The problem with a single measure experiment - the measuring tape is conducting the magnetic field, and the results would be farther than it would have been without it. Also the problem escalates when the experiment is repeated - if the distances to the measuring tape were modified, even the relative results would be falsified, since we don't know the extent of the magnetic field amplification.
Just found your channel and was pleasantly surprised how genuine and nice you are! It feels like a lot of other creators don't have the same enthusiasm for what they do! :)Weiter so! ^^
He certainly has something that a lot of us lack, and that is the humility to share his idea(s) and not care about the critics. There are lot more nerds out there than you think!!!! ROCK ON NERDS!!!!!
Edited to fill in more details and make a more wholesome explaination. A large magnet is is made up of smaller magnets, domains as they're called, these domains are orderly structured single crystal of material that makes up the magnet, but they are still microscopic. Thousands to millions of these domains make up a typical magnet The domains each generate a small magnetic field, It is the aligment of all these domains, forced to line up all in 1 direction, that makes a magnetic strong. Room temperature heat or random vibrations can cause these domains to rotate out of alignment. However, the strong field generated by all the nearby domains keeps individual domains from flipping. This is why magnets retain their strong magnetism at room temperature. When heated, large swaths of domains start to vibrate due to high temperature. Because every domain is now vibrating rapidly, the field generated by the domains (that used to be strong) is now weaker, by virtue of the unstable domain alignment, giving opportunity for individual domains to start flipping. If the temperature is high enough, this causes a cascade effect and the magnet is rapidly demagnetized. This phenomena is much more complicated, 1 complication is that although you lose magnetic strength with heating, it degrades the magnetic strength at a relatively slow rate. At the curie point all magnetism is lost suddenly and abruptly. This points to something deeper happening right at the curie temp (phase change). But for the mean time, you can think of it this way.
Yes, I watched it right through, despite not having any particular knowledge of physics or magnets. It is just nice to see a clean, sensible TH-cam video. I admit it made me feel quite queasy as I collect high end watches and magnets are a anathema to real watches. I'm not sure even the Rolex Milgaus would cope with these magnets!
@@leftysheppey No gravity in space, only black holes.. And that's only if they actually behave the way we are taught. This excludes planets which is obvious.
@@tacticalnewfie2922 there's gravity in lots of places in space. It's just experienced differently. Galaxies pull each other in their local cluster. In all truthfulness, gravity and magnetism are the weakest of the 4 fundamental forces
Could be even if it is quite a thin material. But I also tried sliding the magnet with my hand while applying pressure to the magnet and oddly enough the hard wood seemed more slippery. I wonder if the aluminium tape is thinly coated...
+Golden Thoughts I have seen 0.5mm sheets falling like a feather between two relatively small magnets. With a magnet of that size, combined with friction, that could work just fine
Actually, the eddy currents would work against (Lenz law) the magnet sliding, meaning whenever the magnet got closer together, the eddy currents would seek to push them further apart, albeit very weakly. This would help reduce friction as they aren't biting on the wood so forcefully.
The moving direction of the magnet is what gets resisted and the vertical component is not really there I think since the magnet is only moving in parallel with the tape
For now I'll let them stay together... Should be possible to separate them with a very large splitter tool (th-cam.com/video/ybY_wdQ5MSc/w-d-xo.html) but it's risky with this insane size.
thank you for this video! i love how in depth you go, and learning about which type of effect needs which type of change on a magnet was really fascinating!
I don't even know what I'm doing here. I've no interest in magnets, in fact I know very little about them. Yet this video was the most interesting thing I've seen in a while lol
I have a 3" (76mm) diameter X 2" (51mm) height cylindrical N45 magnet but it is so powerful that I have been unwilling to experiment much with it. Instead I enclosed it inside a solid 4" X 5" block of wood, effectively keeping all objects at least one inch (25mm) away from its surface. In this form it is fairly safe to handle in all sorts of ways and has proved very popular with all my friends and their children. A couple thousand 7mm ball bearings makes it a fascinating toy!
Innocentman1 Read my near disaster. The violence had to be seen to be believed. I was so lucky not to have lost any fingers. And there would have been no doubt. They would have been pulp.
Innocentman1 It's above and talks about my two Neodynium magnets deciding they wanted to be together. IMMEDIATELY!!! VIOLENTLY!!! With a speed that I'd love to know, but aren't sure how to calculate it. At the point of impact, I'm thinking 100 mph++ but it may just have seemed that fast.
Awesome I was always curious about combining magnets of such strength. The wedge is genius but I think you could avoid your sliver issue by trimming the wedge back a few mm or even a cm ALSO, as far as smoothness is concerned, cant beat a nylon wedge (same kind locksmiths use to wedge open car doors and windows) you could cut your own from a nylon block or order pre-fabbed.
I don't know if I've mentioned it before, but I love the new intro where the highlighted hazard symbols kind a give a brief overview of the video. Great video as always!
Could be even if it is quite a thin material. But I also tried sliding the magnet with my hand while applying pressure to the magnet and oddly enough the hard wood seemed more slippery. I wonder if the aluminium tape is thinly coated...
Noahlizard, there's a cute experiment in which you drop a cylindrical magnet through a a copper tube slightly wider than the magnet. It's eerie. If you drop the magnet out in the open - no tube - as a control experiment, then for a second after the magnet enters the tube you wonder what happened to your magnet. Again, Lenz's law (see Damien W's post below.) explains the effect. The magnet starts moving, and moving, it induces a current in the copper conductor which creates its own magnetic field in the direction opposite that of the magnet, which of course slows the magnet. Brainiac could perhaps create a column of square metal circles a little wider than his magnet and try dropping it through. I predict that the magnet will fall in the spaces between the circles, then come to a near stop as it approaches each turn, then fall again. That would make a pretty demonstration of the law.
What Mark Harder described is actually used as the principle behind magnetic brakes. I don't know many applications of it, but it's used in some amusement park games.
Magnets don't affect electromagnetic radiation - including wifi-signals. Otherwise I would have trouble in my house with all the magnets lying around ;) Maybe they could have an effect on the electronics/antenna in the wifi router if placed directly on it though - but I doubt it. Might be worth a try...
Thanks. My first thought was: Better a splinter than my fingernail caught between the magnets :) Large magnets like these can easily squeeze my soft finger flat, grab the harder fingernail and spit the stumped finger out with the nail still between the magnets... Try searching for 'Dirk's magnet accident' for gory images :/
Just about to watch the wedge-slide tests (paused @8:54) but had to say I really like the way you put together your experiments -- looking forward to the outcome :)
Aluminium tape induces the Lenz effect, that's why it slides slower, not actually due to friction. It's the same principle behind the Hendo Hoverboard (except copper is used as it is better for it.
Thanks for the info. You cleared up something I have been thinking about for a while. Your test results gave me the info I was missing so once again, thankyou.
I thank you for your awesome videos! Ive got a few small neodymium magnets,the strongest one can lift 25kg. I like magnets,please make more awesome videos about it!
Lusici Lusci I got two 1 inch cubes from Amazon. put them together, tried to get them apart, couldn't slice them off each other. slid them halfway apart, they flew back together and shattered. wasn't ready for that.
Alec Whatshisname Ive got one 1inch cube and and i safely put it on my stronest one,and safely put them apart. I made the sliding tool from wood and it works great
Very interesting. However, the magnet was manufactured for energizing a coil around a LARGE MASS ferrous object (not a paper clip. I also assume separation may be in order of a couple hundred microns. (I have no clue why the magnet is flat.????) - Does the same effect hold for a stator and rotor? - How does the proximity vary the forces? - Are eddy currents happening in the magnet? (IE would thin sleeves of magnets separated by dielectrics change the magnetic fields?) Just dumb questions...
One of the main reasons you get much lower relative strength due to distance is because of the inverse square law. Force on the paperclip should be a linear relationship with the strength of the magnet, but the force on the saw blade and compass will vary with the square of the distance.
I have also noticed myself that the thickness of the metal makes a big difference on how much a magnet will hold on if it's thin it's easy to get off no matter how strong the magnet is but a thick slab of steel is very hard to get the magnet off it and a strong magnet and a thick slab of steel it's extremely hard to free the magnet from it. great video and awesome work I liked watching the video 👍👍👍
Placing the two magnets together alters the magnetic flux, pushing the size of the field outwards in the direction of the poles. Also, you have to consider that the strength of the field at 104 cm being equivalent to the strength of the first field at 101 cm is due to the large quantity of flux that fills the volume of space difference, not just the linear distance difference. Field strengths drop between cube root to square root of distance from source.
I love your videos. I discovered the wonders science and technology a few years ago and I wish I'd discovered it sooner. I wish my science teachers had been like you.
Brainiac, you should really make a video on high Curie temperature magnets. They're pretty specialty items, but somehow I think you'd enjoy that :). High temp magnets are specifically very useful for 3D printers because their heating elements frequently need to go above 120°C which is obviously very bad for magnets, but magnets improve 3D printers by a long ways, so I think it would make for a very interesting video.
how did you keep the ruler in the same place on the floor in the sawblade test I was trying to match where the ruler crossed the paper but it's blocked In some tests
When you slide a magnet over the aluminium foil you will induce a magnetic field in the foil with the opposite orientation of the movement, which will in turn courses the part of the magnet on the foil to slow down. Same thing would happen if you drop the magnet through a copper tube, the magnet would fall slower, with big magnets they can fall surprisingly slowly.
When two magnets like that are put together, how much force does it take to pull them apart? How much of that force is magnetic? How much is due to the "wringing" effect of 2 flat surfaces?
the reason why the aluminium tape had more friction was because of the magnet inducing a voltage into the electrical conductive aluminum because it was moved over it. Since this is not really a closed circuit there can't flow a normal current but there is a flow of eddy current. This produces a magnetic field which is, after Lenz's law, opossed to the cause of the induction(the magnet being moved over the tape). Thus it slows the magnet down as it glides over the slope.
For the double magnet test, was there any differences in pull force when the paper clip was dead center of the magnet? I was just wondering if there is change in pull force from different areas of the magnet
You have to remember that the force between 2 magnetic dipoles is no a linear function of the distance between them. Crudely, the force decreases proportionally to the 4-th power of the distance. So, the ratio of the forces between 2 dipoles at different distances (as in your magnet and compass experiments) equals the inverse ratio of the distances to the 4-th power. In other words, the force you measure falls off very steeply as you increase the distance between the magnet and the compass. That's why changing the distance by 1 centimeter out of a hundred abruptly changes the force between the magnet and compass. You observed similar effects with the paperclip and saw measurements (although the distance dependence of magnet + steel may be more like 1/d^3 instead of 1/d^4, I don't really remember). Now, as to the small effect of the types of magnetic material on the critical distances you measured: For simplicity, let's call the distance at which the force seems to shut off the 'critical' distance. Because of the dependence of the attractive forces and the inverse 4-th power (that's the square of the square) of the critical distances, the inverse relationship - the dependence of the critical distances on the forces - is proportional to the inverse 4-th root of the force. That's the square root of the square root of the force. You can see that the distances at which you detect no forces between magnet and object depends only very weakly on the force at that distance. You can't assume that the force exerted by a magnet depends very weakly on the type of the magnet's material composition (eg. N45 vs. N38) if you are trying to measure the force with a ruler between the magnet and something else. For example, if the ratio of critical distances is 1.05/1.00, the ratio of forces this represents is approx. 1.215. A 5% change in the distance means you are measuring a 22% change in the force! For practical applications, that means if you are building a device for which you need the greatest distance possible between the magnets you want to use and some other part of your device, then it might be cheaper to buy magnets with large cross-sectional area, as you observed, than using magnets with an inherently stronger material. But, if you are designing a device - a motor for instance - where distances are close but you need the greatest field strength in your magnets, then it might be more efficient to go with N45 instead of N38. I'm sorry if this little essay is confusing. Explaining mathematical relationships when you can't write equations easily is difficult. If you write out the equations and proportions I mentioned above, then the physical concepts I describe will probably make more sense. At any rate, the take home lesson is that you have to be very careful designing experiments in which you measure some quantity using some other observable as its representative. The relationship between the two quantities (eg. force and distance) may not be linear! In this case, far from it!
I love how using just household objects this guy systematically and carefully measures and manipulates these dangerously strong magnets.
There... Isn't really any manipulation going on here... He places the magnets in different positions and tests... He does not however in any instance, manipulate, the magnets.
@@Lordeylord ma·nip·u·late
/məˈnipyəˌlāt/
verb
handle or control (a tool, mechanism, etc.), typically in a skillful manner.
@@HoursFreeAOLsp you trying to define "manipulate" with the one definition that makes it sound like you are right here is kinda childish, not gonna lie. There are multiple definitions that I know for a fact that you saw when you just googled that and you chose not to copy/paste the secondary description because it proves you wrong. Just as you chose to leave out the fact that he isn't actually manipulating any tools (dials of any sort seeing as how to "manipulate" the tool you would have to be "fine tuning" it.) This guy in no instance does any fine tuning with or any other form of manipulation with these magnets. If he was manipulating them, he would have been changing the variables of the experiments that he was doing, for example: superconducting the magnets or something along those lines to MANIPULATE, and or FINE TUNE the magnets to get a SPECIFIC OUTCOME. He never does anything to the magnets that would alter their physical properties in some sense (like what happens when you manipulate the knob of your car stereo for instance, the knob rotates, and the digits chance, as such you are manipulating the dials) if he did, variables pertaining to the magnets specifically would have been being changed. How could have added a base and produced a static charge to see if the magnets became stronger, then he would have been manipulating them. You copy/pasting a specific definition that you CHOSE, doesn't make you right just because it "sounds" like it when you say it in your head. When you complete the first definition that YOU copy/pasted, it clearly defined the type of manipulation that it is referring to. I'm sure you noticed that though and just choice to manipulate the given situation to try and give yourself a leg up, full proper definition seen below for all you savvy dogs.
verb
1.
handle or control (a tool, mechanism, etc.), typically in a skillful manner.
"he manipulated the dials of the set"
Similar:
operate
handle
work
control
use
employ
utilize
2.
control or influence (a person or situation) cleverly, unfairly, or unscrupulously.
"the masses were deceived and manipulated by a tiny group"
Similar:
exploit
control
influence
use/turn to one's advantage
maneuver
engineer
steer
direct
guide
work
orchestrate
choreograph
@@Lordeylord so you’re saying that there is a definition where the use in this context is correct?
@@Chag69420 I'm saying that the definition for manipulations clearly defined what has to be going on for something to be manipulated. There are NEVER any changing variables PERTAINING TO THE MAGNETS. IF THERE WERE VARIABLES BEING CHANGED PERTAINING TO THE MAGNETS, THEN YES THERE WOULD BE MANIPULATION OCCURING. BUT THERE ARE NO VARIABLES PERTAINING TO THE MAGNETS THEMSELVES BEING CHANGED. There is 0 manipulation going on to the magnets here :| end of story.
I love how you were able to determine from the datasheets what the magnets were originally intended for; how version 3 seemed to support that hypothesis, and how you managed to make it very interesting without having any official confirmation or official source footage.
I also love the use of the iconography to illustrate the subject and the dangers involved.
Very well done with minimal means; consistency is a powerful tool
This was fantastic!!!! More magnets please! I'm definitely showing my little brother. And definitely telling him to show his science teacher your videos. So wonderfully done. I'm showing this to as many people as I know. It's spectacular!!!
_WARNING!_
Long? It felt like 30 seconds and I was wide-eyed like a little kid.
At times this video just felt very long to make :) My longest yet and quite a project with all those test, charts etc. Thanks for watching!
stick on the power meter please
Brainiac75 XLnT Keep it up. The vid is not TOO LONG
I would say it is long enough ! In other words I watched the entire video and gained knowledge that I did indeed benefit from. THANX Brainiac75 . Peace be with u my brother
Brainiac75 thank you, your video gave me some knowledge I needed much =)
In every of your videos you show us the attraction, could you show us the repulsion? :o
Maybe, but it's a safety issue. Attraction is fully controllable and predictable. Repulsion is not - the magnets really want to turn around unless in a sturdy rig.
I would say repulsion can be easier to set up, put them on a transparent vertical tube so they're only to move up and down, place weights on the top repelling magnet and measure heights.
I feel like this can be more qualitative, as the only things in this are gravity and the magnetic repulsion.
Will You lol keep in mind he just threw a tape measure and a compass down on the carpet.
That's quite a repulsive request.
+Brainiac75 Instead of the pull test. you should have a controlled height 1mm below the paperclip and measure its pull force.
Also, if possible, i would love to see how these magnets affect iron filings before and after combined.
great vid.
hey, just wanted to point out a problem with the experiment at 5:00:
The problem with a single measure experiment - the measuring tape is conducting the magnetic field, and the results would be farther than it would have been without it.
Also the problem escalates when the experiment is repeated - if the distances to the measuring tape were modified, even the relative results would be falsified, since we don't know the extent of the magnetic field amplification.
Just found your channel and was pleasantly surprised how genuine and nice you are! It feels like a lot of other creators don't have the same enthusiasm for what they do! :)Weiter so! ^^
Thank you very much! More videos to come :)
He certainly has something that a lot of us lack, and that is the humility to share his idea(s) and not care about the critics. There are lot more nerds out there than you think!!!!
ROCK ON NERDS!!!!!
So magnets loose "attraction" when heated?
Yes, based on a measurement scale called _Curie Temperature._
Edited to fill in more details and make a more wholesome explaination.
A large magnet is is made up of smaller magnets, domains as they're called, these domains are orderly structured single crystal of material that makes up the magnet, but they are still microscopic. Thousands to millions of these domains make up a typical magnet
The domains each generate a small magnetic field, It is the aligment of all these domains, forced to line up all in 1 direction, that makes a magnetic strong. Room temperature heat or random vibrations can cause these domains to rotate out of alignment. However, the strong field generated by all the nearby domains keeps individual domains from flipping. This is why magnets retain their strong magnetism at room temperature.
When heated, large swaths of domains start to vibrate due to high temperature. Because every domain is now vibrating rapidly, the field generated by the domains (that used to be strong) is now weaker, by virtue of the unstable domain alignment, giving opportunity for individual domains to start flipping. If the temperature is high enough, this causes a cascade effect and the magnet is rapidly demagnetized.
This phenomena is much more complicated, 1 complication is that although you lose magnetic strength with heating, it degrades the magnetic strength at a relatively slow rate. At the curie point all magnetism is lost suddenly and abruptly. This points to something deeper happening right at the curie temp (phase change). But for the mean time, you can think of it this way.
I always wondered! Thanks!
It makes sense, magnets are more interesting than it may look at first glance
It's greatly weakened; it doesn't return.
Yes, I watched it right through, despite not having any particular knowledge of physics or magnets. It is just nice to see a clean, sensible TH-cam video. I admit it made me feel quite queasy as I collect high end watches and magnets are a anathema to real watches. I'm not sure even the Rolex Milgaus would cope with these magnets!
I would like to see how you've taken them apart 😂
That's something I'm interested in as well!
They'll be stuck together forever :P
Who says he has?
He'll just use the device he always uses, don't think it's as hard as putting them together
If you crush a magnet, do the particles clamp back together into a magnet?
Man
your videos are truly worth to wait for
keep up the good work
Yeah! Looking forward to see this one.
I learned everything I know about big/strong magnets, my respect whilst handling them and the separation thereafter from your channel. thanks bro
The strongest force in nature, highly under represented.
Gravity? ;)
@@leftysheppey No gravity in space, only black holes.. And that's only if they actually behave the way we are taught.
This excludes planets which is obvious.
@@tacticalnewfie2922 there's gravity in lots of places in space. It's just experienced differently.
Galaxies pull each other in their local cluster.
In all truthfulness, gravity and magnetism are the weakest of the 4 fundamental forces
Strong nuclear force?
'... if I, and the magnet survive the pairing' this is already looking cool and only 35 seconds in. Nice.
The magnet might have slid worse on the alu tape because of Eddy currents
[Whatever name goes here] not on something that thin its almost negligible
Could be even if it is quite a thin material. But I also tried sliding the magnet with my hand while applying pressure to the magnet and oddly enough the hard wood seemed more slippery. I wonder if the aluminium tape is thinly coated...
+Golden Thoughts I have seen 0.5mm sheets falling like a feather between two relatively small magnets. With a magnet of that size, combined with friction, that could work just fine
Actually, the eddy currents would work against (Lenz law) the magnet sliding, meaning whenever the magnet got closer together, the eddy currents would seek to push them further apart, albeit very weakly. This would help reduce friction as they aren't biting on the wood so forcefully.
The moving direction of the magnet is what gets resisted and the vertical component is not really there I think since the magnet is only moving in parallel with the tape
No, no one else would make this video. It is rather bizarre. But I'm glad you did.
cheers from cool Vienna, Scott
So? How did you manage to take them giants apart? Or did you left them be?
For now I'll let them stay together... Should be possible to separate them with a very large splitter tool (th-cam.com/video/ybY_wdQ5MSc/w-d-xo.html) but it's risky with this insane size.
I know it's an older post but I still really enjoyed it, I'm just starting to enjoy the effect of magnetic fields....thank you for posting this
Congrats! You are exactly my 5,000th like! Hurray!
thank you for this video! i love how in depth you go, and learning about which type of effect needs which type of change on a magnet was really fascinating!
I don't even know what I'm doing here. I've no interest in magnets, in fact I know very little about them. Yet this video was the most interesting thing I've seen in a while lol
I have a 3" (76mm) diameter X 2" (51mm) height cylindrical N45 magnet but it is so powerful that I have been unwilling to experiment much with it. Instead I enclosed it inside a solid 4" X 5" block of wood, effectively keeping all objects at least one inch (25mm) away from its surface. In this form it is fairly safe to handle in all sorts of ways and has proved very popular with all my friends and their children. A couple thousand 7mm ball bearings makes it a fascinating toy!
Time to make a subwoofer driver out of these. Underhung design!
I subscribed Simply because you added that disclaimer at the intro! The only channel i've seen do that!
Hehe, welcome aboard!
Im almost fallen asleep at watching.. not cuz that was boring, im tired. That was really interesting! I will subscribe.
Cool - welcome aboard :)
Brainiac75 thx!
Love the lego technic pieces you used in your paperclip test!
omg risk warning makes video more EPIC !
Innocentman1 Read my near disaster. The violence had to be seen to be believed. I was so lucky not to have lost any fingers. And there would have been no doubt. They would have been pulp.
Innocentman1 It's above and talks about my two Neodynium magnets deciding they wanted to be together. IMMEDIATELY!!! VIOLENTLY!!! With a speed that I'd love to know, but aren't sure how to calculate it. At the point of impact, I'm thinking 100 mph++ but it may just have seemed that fast.
great video. I was really surprised.I would have thought doubling up would have doubled the up the first 2 tests. You learn something new every day.
Nice use of legos on the scale
Lego. Lego. Lego. No s.
1000 people who don't like a foreign accent.
Great video, very informative. Great command of English for a second language.
Awesome I was always curious about combining magnets of such strength. The wedge is genius but I think you could avoid your sliver issue by trimming the wedge back a few mm or even a cm ALSO, as far as smoothness is concerned, cant beat a nylon wedge (same kind locksmiths use to wedge open car doors and windows) you could cut your own from a nylon block or order pre-fabbed.
I don't know if I've mentioned it before, but I love the new intro where the highlighted hazard symbols kind a give a brief overview of the video. Great video as always!
"I went Viking on it"
Bravo! Well thought-out, scientific approach to testing and measuring the magnets. You have won yourself a subscriber.
Nice! Welcome aboard :)
LOVE THE RISK WARNINGS
i really enjoy how much legos you are using in your vids :D
the aluminum tape would have had less friction! its due to the eddy current being created that the magnet was tilting on the wedge!
Could be even if it is quite a thin material. But I also tried sliding the magnet with my hand while applying pressure to the magnet and oddly enough the hard wood seemed more slippery. I wonder if the aluminium tape is thinly coated...
Noahlizard, there's a cute experiment in which you drop a cylindrical magnet through a a copper tube slightly wider than the magnet. It's eerie. If you drop the magnet out in the open - no tube - as a control experiment, then for a second after the magnet enters the tube you wonder what happened to your magnet. Again, Lenz's law (see Damien W's post below.) explains the effect. The magnet starts moving, and moving, it induces a current in the copper conductor which creates its own magnetic field in the direction opposite that of the magnet, which of course slows the magnet. Brainiac could perhaps create a column of square metal circles a little wider than his magnet and try dropping it through. I predict that the magnet will fall in the spaces between the circles, then come to a near stop as it approaches each turn, then fall again. That would make a pretty demonstration of the law.
Mark Harder, if that could actually be designed and used as a way to combine magnets it would be amazing!
What Mark Harder described is actually used as the principle behind magnetic brakes.
I don't know many applications of it, but it's used in some amusement park games.
Love your makeshift gauge for comparing field strengths.
That space odessy reference tho
Lubię Pociągi Must have missed it.. Where?
The Monolith was the mysterious alien object that started and starred in 2001.
Unfortunately, the magnets are not technically 2001: A Space Odyssey's dimensional ratios, which are 1x4x9.
This amuses me, too, Lubię.
"My God, it's full of stars!"
It's always a pleasure to watch your videos.
YES this is 2017 with a magnet!!
thank for the like Brian!
NAlax
True
Seeing your hands shake twisting those things really makes it clear the forces you're dealing with.. frightening.
Brainiac, could you do a video on how magnets affect wifi reception, if at all?
Magnets don't affect electromagnetic radiation - including wifi-signals. Otherwise I would have trouble in my house with all the magnets lying around ;) Maybe they could have an effect on the electronics/antenna in the wifi router if placed directly on it though - but I doubt it. Might be worth a try...
TheRealTrikein i put a strong n magnet out of very old telephone when i was teen near our tv it pulled the screen in
Inside CRTs of the past, an electron beam did the scanning.. Electrons are charged, and will be affected by magnetism.
First time seeing your channel. Good stuff man. Guess I have some more stuff to binge watch.
Thanks! And welcome aboard :)
I love magnets so much
GRiiM you could say your attracted to them
Marcus Hollis you're right
This was a good safety video. One can clearly see from your splinter problem just how dangerous a strong magnet can be.
Thanks. My first thought was: Better a splinter than my fingernail caught between the magnets :)
Large magnets like these can easily squeeze my soft finger flat, grab the harder fingernail and spit the stumped finger out with the nail still between the magnets... Try searching for 'Dirk's magnet accident' for gory images :/
The good thing about connecting two monolyth 2 magnets is that You will have a good exesice :D
I don't know how I would have gotten through this video without those timecodes
i belled you mate so i never miss an upload
Just about to watch the wedge-slide tests (paused @8:54) but had to say I really like the way you put together your experiments -- looking forward to the outcome :)
Yes ... Excellent ... Sound conclusions as well, it seems :)
Thanks for putting this together and sharing on TH-cam.
So what did we learn today?
magnets are cool.
I love magnets so much that my parents think I am weird 🤣
This guy should do an Audiobook. I'd listen. Sometimes I put him on while browsing. Very relaxing.
Stronger is always better.
"Stronger is better" 2 Peter 4:1
Unless you're working with magnets then the field is weaker.............
Aluminium tape induces the Lenz effect, that's why it slides slower, not actually due to friction. It's the same principle behind the Hendo Hoverboard (except copper is used as it is better for it.
who played with speaker magnets raise your hand
wow you continue to surprise me. the production and editing of this video is not comparable to anything I've seen of this topic. keep it up!
I have a challenge for you; create a ferrite magnet at least 2cm cubed that is able to hold 1kg. Using only non magnetic materials.
does doing it in space count?
the magnetising would be hard
Not impossible. I would use an Heusler alloy.
Good idea.
"Create a magnet out of stuff that isn't magnets and make it do stuff that magnets do even though it isn't a magnet."
You mean make an electromagnet?
Thanks for the info. You cleared up something I have been thinking about for a while. Your test results gave me the info I was missing so once again, thankyou.
Conclusion: size does matter.
Fantastic Video & Awesome Magnets Dude. Keep up the great work. Nick.
He just created a magnet with a 400kg pull force... That's 890 pounds. That's nearly half a ton omg.
wow.... I've never been so bored in my entire life.. I'll keep this video in mind next time I'm struggling to sleep
I'm 13, watched the whole video, still would of if it was an hour.
How do you get the magnets apart ?
Who here has got neodymium magnets?
I have a few... Thanks for watching ;)
I thank you for your awesome videos! Ive got a few small neodymium magnets,the strongest one can lift 25kg.
I like magnets,please make more
awesome videos about it!
Lusici Lusci I got two 1 inch cubes from Amazon. put them together, tried to get them apart, couldn't slice them off each other. slid them halfway apart, they flew back together and shattered. wasn't ready for that.
Alec Whatshisname Ive got one 1inch cube and and i safely put it on my stronest one,and safely put them apart. I made the sliding tool from wood and it works great
I have a few; you can get them out of old hard drives.
you should use these magnets on all of the elements, practically a reboot of your old project
"size does matter"
Onyx Jade Your mom sure loves some 👌🏻
Very interesting. However, the magnet was manufactured for energizing a coil around a LARGE MASS ferrous object (not a paper clip. I also assume separation may be in order of a couple hundred microns. (I have no clue why the magnet is flat.????)
- Does the same effect hold for a stator and rotor?
- How does the proximity vary the forces?
- Are eddy currents happening in the magnet? (IE would thin sleeves of magnets separated by dielectrics change the magnetic fields?)
Just dumb questions...
I stayed up late just so I could watch this as soon as possible! I was being naughty!
You have to pinch me with your big magnets, Daddy!
Christa Naille wtf
StrikePlaysGames actually I think you meant obliterate,not pinch
what the mcfuck
Are you sure you want your ballsies pinched by another man Chris?
Christa Naille I love you
I'm always happy when I get to see a Brainiac video! 👍
Prøve og lave en giveaway med en magnet
One of the main reasons you get much lower relative strength due to distance is because of the inverse square law. Force on the paperclip should be a linear relationship with the strength of the magnet, but the force on the saw blade and compass will vary with the square of the distance.
Noti squad?
mhm
Pix3lPotato eyy
Ofc
Please stop!
Please disappear?
Another nice video, this time I was early :) Also congrats on 150k! Hopes for more growth in the future
Wow I didnt see this video in my sub box this morning.. I turned notifications on so I wont miss one of your uploads again :D Love your videos
I have also noticed myself that the thickness of the metal makes a big difference on how much a magnet will hold on if it's thin it's easy to get off no matter how strong the magnet is but a thick slab of steel is very hard to get the magnet off it and a strong magnet and a thick slab of steel it's extremely hard to free the magnet from it.
great video and awesome work I liked watching the video 👍👍👍
Placing the two magnets together alters the magnetic flux, pushing the size of the field outwards in the direction of the poles. Also, you have to consider that the strength of the field at 104 cm being equivalent to the strength of the first field at 101 cm is due to the large quantity of flux that fills the volume of space difference, not just the linear distance difference. Field strengths drop between cube root to square root of distance from source.
Yep, the difference between 104 and 133 cm in the compass is larger than it sounds :)
If you cut a magnet like that into 8ths, will the small pieces still be polarized?
quite interesting - and his comedic wit does make me chuckle.
I love your videos. I discovered the wonders science and technology a few years ago and I wish I'd discovered it sooner. I wish my science teachers had been like you.
Brainiac, you should really make a video on high Curie temperature magnets. They're pretty specialty items, but somehow I think you'd enjoy that :). High temp magnets are specifically very useful for 3D printers because their heating elements frequently need to go above 120°C which is obviously very bad for magnets, but magnets improve 3D printers by a long ways, so I think it would make for a very interesting video.
How to get them apart again?
Love your videos! Keep doing what you do! ❤
And here we go again!
I have to watch the rest of the video but I know it'll be another Brainiac Masterpiece ;)
What magnet combo would you use for magnet fishing? What combination would you use to lessen any snags?
how did you keep the ruler in the same place on the floor in the sawblade test I was trying to match where the ruler crossed the paper but it's blocked In some tests
This video changed my life.
Thanks brainiac ! You have exquisite teacher skills
When you slide a magnet over the aluminium foil you will induce a magnetic field in the foil with the opposite orientation of the movement, which will in turn courses the part of the magnet on the foil to slow down.
Same thing would happen if you drop the magnet through a copper tube, the magnet would fall slower, with big magnets they can fall surprisingly slowly.
love that little lego contraption on the paperclip test.
Hi in does a spherical magnet exists and what are the locations of its poles
Hello is it also possible too coat a 600kg pulling force fishing magnet in epoxy too protect it from damaging
When two magnets like that are put together, how much force does it take to pull them apart? How much of that force is magnetic? How much is due to the "wringing" effect of 2 flat surfaces?
How incredibly pleasant with a youtuber who doesn't speak at the speed of a machine gun!
the reason why the aluminium tape had more friction was because of the magnet inducing a voltage into the electrical conductive aluminum because it was moved over it. Since this is not really a closed circuit there can't flow a normal current but there is a flow of eddy current. This produces a magnetic field which is, after Lenz's law, opossed to the cause of the induction(the magnet being moved over the tape). Thus it slows the magnet down as it glides over the slope.
Curious on the paperclip pull that you don’t try to pull from the pole face center
For the double magnet test, was there any differences in pull force when the paper clip was dead center of the magnet?
I was just wondering if there is change in pull force from different areas of the magnet
You have to remember that the force between 2 magnetic dipoles is no a linear function of the distance between them. Crudely, the force decreases proportionally to the 4-th power of the distance. So, the ratio of the forces between 2 dipoles at different distances (as in your magnet and compass experiments) equals the inverse ratio of the distances to the 4-th power. In other words, the force you measure falls off very steeply as you increase the distance between the magnet and the compass. That's why changing the distance by 1 centimeter out of a hundred abruptly changes the force between the magnet and compass. You observed similar effects with the paperclip and saw measurements (although the distance dependence of magnet + steel may be more like 1/d^3 instead of 1/d^4, I don't really remember).
Now, as to the small effect of the types of magnetic material on the critical distances you measured: For simplicity, let's call the distance at which the force seems to shut off the 'critical' distance. Because of the dependence of the attractive forces and the inverse 4-th power (that's the square of the square) of the critical distances, the inverse relationship - the dependence of the critical distances on the forces - is proportional to the inverse 4-th root of the force. That's the square root of the square root of the force. You can see that the distances at which you detect no forces between magnet and object depends only very weakly on the force at that distance. You can't assume that the force exerted by a magnet depends very weakly on the type of the magnet's material composition (eg. N45 vs. N38) if you are trying to measure the force with a ruler between the magnet and something else. For example, if the ratio of critical distances is 1.05/1.00, the ratio of forces this represents is approx. 1.215. A 5% change in the distance means you are measuring a 22% change in the force! For practical applications, that means if you are building a device for which you need the greatest distance possible between the magnets you want to use and some other part of your device, then it might be cheaper to buy magnets with large cross-sectional area, as you observed, than using magnets with an inherently stronger material. But, if you are designing a device - a motor for instance - where distances are close but you need the greatest field strength in your magnets, then it might be more efficient to go with N45 instead of N38.
I'm sorry if this little essay is confusing. Explaining mathematical relationships when you can't write equations easily is difficult. If you write out the equations and proportions I mentioned above, then the physical concepts I describe will probably make more sense.
At any rate, the take home lesson is that you have to be very careful designing experiments in which you measure some quantity using some other observable as its representative. The relationship between the two quantities (eg. force and distance) may not be linear! In this case, far from it!