Which of these creatures do you think it had the most impressive changes? Do you want to see more videos like this one in the channel? Let me know in the comments! If you enjoyed this video don´t forget to give it a LIKE and share it with people you think they would like it too, that helps the channel a lot! Thank you!
I find it very funny that we thought Oviraptor was an egg eater because it was always found with eggs, but it turns out it was actually just a really good mother
I love how much these guys have changed with our understanding of the animals, I know everyone likes to point out Spinosaurus as one that has changed the most but honestly the earlier finds back when we didn’t really know what a dinosaur was definitely have changed the most. A leg fossil of Megalosaurus was even named scrotum at one point, I’m not even joking
I have one that looks like a hornless Triceratops with claws and dragon teeth, one that looks like a Dimetrodon crossed with an Ankylosaurus, and another that looks half Stegosaurus, half armadillo and I've yet to figure out what they're actually supposed to be... I also have a 1920s depiction of a Tyrannosaurus that I got at an antique shop, but an engraving in the plastic claims it's an Allosaurus (it has only two fingers, it is NOT an Allosaurus). Plastic dinosaurs are weird.
@@Pipkiablo I have one that's one of those carnivore-headed ones with the open mouth that's hollow (you know which type of toy I mean), but it's a quadruped covered in very cone-like spikes that don't occur on any actual dinosaurs. I have no idea what it's meant to be. I also have a dilophosaurus engraved as a spinosaurus
Very interesting to see the evolution of paleoart which mirrors the evolution of our understanding of those long gone creatures. Though I've got to say that the shift in public perception of dinosaurs is a lot slower. Kids still draw dinosaurs in early 20th century style.
@@josh_reptiliano Agreed. Pop culture is important to keeping dinosaurs and the evolution of life on earth important in the general publics mind. I do wish there was more that portrayed them up to modern standards though. If anything they're a lot more unique and creative than past iterations when our knowledge was even more limited than it is now.
@@samuelc.sthecapybara6618 Marsh didn't name Marshosaurus, it was James Masden. He named it in honour of Marsh. Interestingly, the species name, M. bicentisimus, came about because the US was celebrating 200 years of independence in 1976, the year of the naming. Marshosaurus is a megalosaurid that lived during the Kimmeridgian of the Jurassic period, about 157-152 million years ago.
Loved this video man, probably my favourite one so far. Your art is as always outstanding, you make outdated dinosaur reconstructions look amazing. Love the art dude, keep it up 👍
I would say the swift from the 60s to 70s was even more revolutionary! the dinosaur renaissance completely changed the idea of what a dinosaur is. But for sure we are now in a new golden era with more discoveries than ever
I love your paleo videos! Always so beautifully drawn and edited. I think it would be really cool if you made a “Jurassic park/World vs Current Scientific Understanding” video- anyone else agree?
Even paleontologists make mistakes. They used to think Elasmosaurus' head was on what they now know is its tail, they thought Anomalocaris was three different invertebrate animals bunched together, they believed the thumb spikes on Iguanodon were nose-horns, they believed Stegosaurus had a second brain in its tail, they thought Therizinosaurus was a turtle-like reptile, they thought Basilosaurus was a reptile in general, they believed woolly mammoths were ancient piglike mammals, and they thought Pterosaurs were flying mammals, or even reptiles that swam through the sea. And don't get me started on the teeth Helicoprion had.
it's not much that the ¨make mistakes¨. it's that they didn't have enough data yet. If 200 years ago all you have is a tooth or a portion of a bone that looks like a scrotum, it's hard to image how the original animal looked liked. After years of research, collecting more fossils and especially after finding complete skeletons, you make less mistakes
I feel like some other reconstructions were missing for a lot of them considering some changes that happened throughout the years still were prominent for a while before a new change came in, but aside from that good job! :D
Las reconstrucciones originales del Megalosaurus, Elasmosaurus y Estegosaurio, y la de 1920 del Iguanodon me encantan. Si alguna vez creará un universo ficticio, incluiría criaturas basadas en esos diseños.
The 1854 Waterhouse Hawkins sculptures in Crystal Palace Park also include some other reptiles and amphibians (beyond the famous Iguanodon and Megalosaurus) who are really...different than our current understanding. I love them all.
I'm so glad this was re-uploaded again, and a bit updated as well. For those of you who don't know, an older version of this video used to exist on TH-cam 2 years ago, but was removed for some reason. And then when it got re-uploaded last year, it was removed again. I cross my fingers hoping it doesn't happen to this one! 🤞🤞
It's actually a remake! The original video was from my old channel, which got hacked. Then I reuploaded it here, but I removed it because now I'm upgrading the old videos for this new channel. So cool that you remember! :)
Thanks so much for the informative video! Its very interesting how ideas about Dino anatomy and such have changed over the years. I recently went to my local museum and bought my mum a Tyrannosaurus toy: it has pictofibres and dinofuzz, yet it's in that classic kangaroo tail dragging upright pose that used to be so popular! I find it to be a weird blend of old and new ideas. Edit: Seeing the first stegosaur reminded me of an idea around that time, that I heard from another video. It was theorized because it's brain was so small, it must have another in the end of its tail! A very wacky idea indeed, but then again nature does have some wonderful designs!
@@White_Snakes that's old news! Brontosaurus is considered a valid genus separated from Apatosaurus since 2015 again. Yes, many dinosaurs had featers, that's why Deinonychus ot Oviraptor are protrayed that way. Those had feathers. But not all dinosaurs that them. that depends on what group of dinosaurs they belong to, and other issues such as size, behaviour and environment
@@nyjilthebirdtrebuchet1990 deinonychus was the only one that had feathers in this video and he is the height of a harpy in terms of height so technically he is not that giant. Many say that dinosaurs with feathers are not frightening then ... Why not see behind a casuarius? 😂😂
Neat, i like the improvment since the last version you did ! Although i think "2020s" should still be "2010s" since the 2020s have barely started, especially considering the recent rethinking about Megalosauridae's place within Theropoda (potentially more closely related to allosauridae i believe, i'm not an expert though but, the point still stands i think that we don't know what exciting stuff will happen in the 2020s yet.) Perhaps another option could be to give precise years maybe, to show exactly when such shifts took place ?
yeah, it was tricky in some cases to choose between 2010s or 2020s. Spinosaurus is clearly 2020s, but the decade just started and still has a lot to bring to the table. For other cases like Tyrannosaurus or Megalosaurus I was about to label them as 2010s, but I think that what is more characteristic of that decade for theropods in general was the heavy feathering, which now changed to something more moderate. But in any case the lines are also blurry between other decades on this matter, like from the 1920s to the 1960s, the general view of dinosaurs didn't change much. It's an approximation
@@remylebarh5426 nah, it doens't. it's way better than the 2010 version. the 2010 version looks like a wannabe-diplodocus with a small head and with a fish body
@@mariaclarh99 bruh, at least it's more accurate. Cope's version looks like a generic, giant lizard that grew flippers instead of legs and feet or in other words, a wannabe mosasaur. The more accurate Elasmosaurus reconstruction shows a unique marine animal, one with a long neck. But that's your opinion so ok.
It would have been cool if the 1880s stego was real (although as a completely different dinosaur from Stegosaurus), as a highly derived basal sauropodomorph or basal thyreophoran resembling this outdated stego reconstruction. :D
Here is a classification based on their shapes:brontosaurus-sauropod megalosaurus-Theropoda elasmosaurus-plesiosauria stegosaurus-herbivora deinonychus-dromaeosauridae iguanodon-ornithopoda mososaurus-Mososauridae tyrannosaurus-theropoda pterodactylus-pterodactyla spinosaurus-theropoda oviraptor-oviraptora
Please do Part 2 of this i really like it also did deinonychus really looked like a sparrow without its beak also i never thought that there was a time when oviraptor was thought to be a scally Lizard Very cool
Excellent video, especially for the high quality of the representations of the dinosaurs as living animals. In fact, these renderings of Mario Lanzas are so good and realistic that even the "wrong models" look like completely believable animals that could very well have existed. Very few paleoartists are capable of putting so much effort into a representation that has already been dismissed by science as obsolete. How I would like to have this series of the evolution of our artistic interpretations of dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures in a good paleoart book! It's great to have them in a TH-cam video, sure, but for me, a real book would be more appropriate. As a suggestion, I think that in some cases, an extra illustration would be necessary to have a more complete idea of the evolution of our conception of some of these animals. That is to say, each animal is represented in the video with two or three images that show as many versions of its scientific interpretation, but I think that some needed four images, and in some cases, perhaps up to five, to fully show the evolution of their image proposed by science (for example, an image was missing from the very recent interpretation of Spinosaurus as completely quadrupedal, or one of Apatosaurus from the 80s-90s, when it no longer dragged its tail, but still did not have the thick neck with which it is represented today). I hope that over time, these series can grow and increase the number of dinosaurs represented, and (if necessary) the number of versions of each.
![[~40K SUBS] Dinosaurs Reconstructions Evolution Special Animation (Stick Nodes)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/piGgcOrxqpQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Which of these creatures do you think it had the most impressive changes? Do you want to see more videos like this one in the channel? Let me know in the comments!
If you enjoyed this video don´t forget to give it a LIKE and share it with people you think they would like it too, that helps the channel a lot! Thank you!
Megalosaurus and Iguanodon
I would like to see a Therizinosaurus turtle with your art style
I have to go with that freaking marsupial pterodatylus. It's definitely the furthest from the real animal
I loved this video! I would like to see other classic animals like Parasaurolophus, Triceratops, Ankylosaurus, Brachiosaurus, Styracosaurus, etc.
Spino,Stego,Mega,Iguano.
I find it very funny that we thought Oviraptor was an egg eater because it was always found with eggs, but it turns out it was actually just a really good mother
It's like saying when a person is always found hanging around with children he/she is a pedophile.
I really wonder why it took us so long to consider that
Never let them know your next move - oviratpor 1970
It might still ate eggs tho but we dont know yet
They could eat eggs, due to the form of skull and maybe stole from Protoceratops' nests for nutrients as eggs contain many healthy benefits
1:52 1920's iguanodon already liked this video.
Lmao
The Fonzsauros
lol
Jojo dino reference!?!
Lmao
I love how much these guys have changed with our understanding of the animals, I know everyone likes to point out Spinosaurus as one that has changed the most but honestly the earlier finds back when we didn’t really know what a dinosaur was definitely have changed the most.
A leg fossil of Megalosaurus was even named scrotum at one point, I’m not even joking
Scrotum humanum,oh yeah )))
Hank from PBS Eons be like
they are the one who was joking
Megalosaurus has changed even more than Spinosaurus!
@@orionmclaughlin5680 that's only because Megalosaurus was found first
Proof that outdated reconstructions CAN hold aesthetic value right alongside modern, up-to-date reconstructions. Great work. :)
in ten years the modern ones will be outdated
@@rodrigodias4134 Maybe, or maybe not. We really don't know at this point.
@@rodrigodias4134 doubt it honestly, behavior maybe but there isn’t too much to change about something like velociraptor
1:48 Iguanodon seems to be very uncomfortable greeting a crowd.
- H-hey guys 👍🏻👍🏻
He seems to be a cool guy
Godzilla style pose is what I like to call it.
Kangaroo
игуанодон ставит жирные лайки
0:43 so THAT'S what my unidentifiable plastic dinosaur is
Ducksaurus lol
I have one that looks like a hornless Triceratops with claws and dragon teeth, one that looks like a Dimetrodon crossed with an Ankylosaurus, and another that looks half Stegosaurus, half armadillo and I've yet to figure out what they're actually supposed to be...
I also have a 1920s depiction of a Tyrannosaurus that I got at an antique shop, but an engraving in the plastic claims it's an Allosaurus (it has only two fingers, it is NOT an Allosaurus). Plastic dinosaurs are weird.
@@Pipkiablo oh my...
@@Pipkiablo I have one that's one of those carnivore-headed ones with the open mouth that's hollow (you know which type of toy I mean), but it's a quadruped covered in very cone-like spikes that don't occur on any actual dinosaurs. I have no idea what it's meant to be. I also have a dilophosaurus engraved as a spinosaurus
I have a "Dilophosaurus" that stands straight up, has two fingers, no crests, and has the face of an Allosaurus. :I
Very interesting to see the evolution of paleoart which mirrors the evolution of our understanding of those long gone creatures. Though I've got to say that the shift in public perception of dinosaurs is a lot slower. Kids still draw dinosaurs in early 20th century style.
It is kinda thanks to pop culture being so nostalgic towards old dinosaurs
Dinosaurs and animals that have been long extinct
Да, отличное видео.)
Spinosaurs being *like that* is seared into my mind since Jurassic Park.
@@josh_reptiliano Agreed. Pop culture is important to keeping dinosaurs and the evolution of life on earth important in the general publics mind. I do wish there was more that portrayed them up to modern standards though. If anything they're a lot more unique and creative than past iterations when our knowledge was even more limited than it is now.
plot twist: the old elasmosaurus has a short head and a long tail because scientists thought its long neck was its tail.
Edward Drinker Cope mistakenly attached the head to the tail, and was later mocked for it by his rival Marsh.
@@thisisbetterthanmyprevious6674 marsh? Sounds familiar, is it the founder of marshosaurus?
@@samuelc.sthecapybara6618 Othniel Charles Marsh was Cope’s rival in the bone wars. Look it up, it’s really interesting dinosaur history.
@@samuelc.sthecapybara6618 Marshosaurus was named after Marsh
@@samuelc.sthecapybara6618 Marsh didn't name Marshosaurus, it was James Masden. He named it in honour of Marsh. Interestingly, the species name, M. bicentisimus, came about because the US was celebrating 200 years of independence in 1976, the year of the naming. Marshosaurus is a megalosaurid that lived during the Kimmeridgian of the Jurassic period, about 157-152 million years ago.
2:50 The moment you've all been waiting for
Yes
Yes
@Frosty yea it was
nah
Underrated comment
I can't praise this channel enough! Phenomenal artwork!
thank you so much!
1920's iguanadon agrees
kindly
I love how 1850s megalosaurus looks in your illustration it looks so life like.
It really looks like real terrestrial crocodylomorphs
Loved this video man, probably my favourite one so far. Your art is as always outstanding, you make outdated dinosaur reconstructions look amazing. Love the art dude, keep it up 👍
Thank you so much!
@@MarioLanzas. no worries man
1920's Iguanodon: *Eternal Disappointment*
0:52 OC Marsh has entered the chat.
Ah yes. The famous head n’ tail switcheroo
Awesome, so cool to see how our perception of so many things change with time.
And it really is the golden age of paleontology from the 2010s.
I would say the swift from the 60s to 70s was even more revolutionary! the dinosaur renaissance completely changed the idea of what a dinosaur is. But for sure we are now in a new golden era with more discoveries than ever
@@MarioLanzas. .....oh yeah, off course the renaissance!
@@MarioLanzas. I thought dinosaurs renaissance was 1800s in fossil war
And also golden age for paleoart
I love your paleo videos! Always so beautifully drawn and edited. I think it would be really cool if you made a “Jurassic park/World vs Current Scientific Understanding” video- anyone else agree?
Thank you! I think the Jurassic Park themed video is preciselly the next one!
Old dinosaurs: Back in my day we look like this.
New dinosaurs: Well now we look like this.
Also this is pretty awesome.
Even paleontologists make mistakes. They used to think Elasmosaurus' head was on what they now know is its tail, they thought Anomalocaris was three different invertebrate animals bunched together, they believed the thumb spikes on Iguanodon were nose-horns, they believed Stegosaurus had a second brain in its tail, they thought Therizinosaurus was a turtle-like reptile, they thought Basilosaurus was a reptile in general, they believed woolly mammoths were ancient piglike mammals, and they thought Pterosaurs were flying mammals, or even reptiles that swam through the sea. And don't get me started on the teeth Helicoprion had.
it's not much that the ¨make mistakes¨. it's that they didn't have enough data yet. If 200 years ago all you have is a tooth or a portion of a bone that looks like a scrotum, it's hard to image how the original animal looked liked. After years of research, collecting more fossils and especially after finding complete skeletons, you make less mistakes
Estaría bien una segunda parte,o si no un top de todos los dinosaurios más grandes de su grupo (teropoda,sauropoda,etc)
1:01 you can tell they mixed up the neck with the tail
I still get 2000s spinosaurus popping up in my dinosaur magazine
they are a plague!
some of them has different fonts, like the more "classical" ones
good job on the small details
When I was a kid I didn't acept the modern Spinosaurio design, but nowadays I like more, it's like a river dragon
Early Megalosaurus looked epic tbh
But completely wrong how it actually looked
If you make another video in this series, maybe you could add Therizinosaurus, Deinocheirus, Triceratops, and Helicoprion.
Hey nice idea tho the therizino is my favorite dinosaur 👍
I still draw 1970s Deinonychuses 😅
Old school 🤷♂️
I feel like some other reconstructions were missing for a lot of them considering some changes that happened throughout the years still were prominent for a while before a new change came in, but aside from that good job! :D
Definitely there is much more! this is a very condensed video. I think maybe I'll dedicate separate videos to each animal to get more into details
@@MarioLanzas. awesome! :)
Awesome video of the changing portrayal of dinosaurs in art.
Las reconstrucciones originales del Megalosaurus, Elasmosaurus y Estegosaurio, y la de 1920 del Iguanodon me encantan. Si alguna vez creará un universo ficticio, incluiría criaturas basadas en esos diseños.
the way we saw dinosaurs was so weird but interesting
The 1854 Waterhouse Hawkins sculptures in Crystal Palace Park also include some other reptiles and amphibians (beyond the famous Iguanodon and Megalosaurus) who are really...different than our current understanding. I love them all.
The old reconstruction of the Iguanodon is very weird.
Awesome, probally my favorite video by you so far
Looking at the Oviraptor, I never knew the animal some sort of tooth in its beak.🤔
Spinosaurus has got to be one of the most changed dinosaurs since it’s discovery
Perfect!! Congratulations, You awsome 😎👍
i love how the 1920's iguanodon's hands look like its a thumbs up like its just, "ok man cool"
The modern representation of these dinosaurs actually look a lot better
XIX Century dinosaurs: Big lizards
2020 dinosaurs: Big HD lizards
2020 dinosaurs: bEEg chiKin
2020 : i don't how to behave like reptile man
@@Beb_2199 big dinosaurs arent chickens
I'm so glad this was re-uploaded again, and a bit updated as well.
For those of you who don't know, an older version of this video used to exist on TH-cam 2 years ago, but was removed for some reason. And then when it got re-uploaded last year, it was removed again.
I cross my fingers hoping it doesn't happen to this one! 🤞🤞
It's actually a remake!
The original video was from my old channel, which got hacked. Then I reuploaded it here, but I removed it because now I'm upgrading the old videos for this new channel. So cool that you remember! :)
1:50 I love how iguanodon is just like 👍￣ᴥ￣👍
I like the fonts of each year.
old paleoart is just so creative, I love it
they had to use their imagination much more back then after all
I love how Megalosaurus just means “big lizard”.
The 1920 iguanadon looks like it’s putting a thumbs up and that is awesome
Whoa, I never knew how strange the earliest reconstructions of Stegosaurus were. It kind of looks like Scelidosaurus or Stegouros.
Increíble video, por favor mas de este tipo
Choice of different fonts you used for each decade is a really nice touch
Honestly spinosaurus has gone through so many revisions that you could make a entire video on it alone.
The 2000’s Spinosaurus is the look of spino we all familar with
1:11 Oh that’s just my escaped turtle
Outstanding!
spino went from terrestrial to aquatic as we discovered more about it
Please make more videos like thiiiis
epic... i love the video mario.... soooooo cooolll
thank you!!
Man what beautiful art. I've been looking for a video like this for a while, I'm subscribing.
The 2000 spinosaurus was the favorite spinosaurus....
Because the 2000s reconstruction looks logic
@@jonathanharry4684 the 2000s Version was more a beast
So glad i grew up with this (shows old dinosaurs)
But damn, this looks better (shows redesigned dinosaurs)
Thanks so much for the informative video! Its very interesting how ideas about Dino anatomy and such have changed over the years. I recently went to my local museum and bought my mum a Tyrannosaurus toy: it has pictofibres and dinofuzz, yet it's in that classic kangaroo tail dragging upright pose that used to be so popular! I find it to be a weird blend of old and new ideas.
Edit: Seeing the first stegosaur reminded me of an idea around that time, that I heard from another video. It was theorized because it's brain was so small, it must have another in the end of its tail! A very wacky idea indeed, but then again nature does have some wonderful designs!
Personally I like the two thumbs up recreation of Iguanodon
What software do you use for your drawings?
mostly medibang
The 2020 Spinosaurus so cool looking and every thing matches up!
Very good details 😎 , a complete depiction of how scientific knowledge became more accurate.
The 1850s megalosaur looks like terrestrial crocodylomorphs
Great vid, tho i was hoping for more shrink wrapped 90s and early 2000s Dinos, which still plegue the public perception
0:29 he is back!!! 🦕😼
I see you're improving your work, nice. Are you going to plan to start bigger projects?
I have a lot of projects in mind! step by step :)
@@White_Snakes that's old news! Brontosaurus is considered a valid genus separated from Apatosaurus since 2015 again.
Yes, many dinosaurs had featers, that's why Deinonychus ot Oviraptor are protrayed that way. Those had feathers. But not all dinosaurs that them. that depends on what group of dinosaurs they belong to, and other issues such as size, behaviour and environment
@@White_Snakes don´t be! :)
1920s iguanodon be like "good work buddy" 😂😂
Tu diseño de Stegosaurus me encantaaa, además que es mi dinosaurio favorito jajajaj.Saludos
el mío tambien! :)
Dino evolution & that song a perfect video, good work my friend!
Iguanodon de los años 20: Qué pasa aquí yo re fachero, todo bien?
Kajaja
El iguanodon de los años 20 está refarefarefarefarefarefachero facherito😎
Dinosaurs then: Giant Lizards
Dinosaurs Now: Giant Chickens
Feel old yet?
Gaint chicken what an insult 😔
Gaint Cassowary
Gaint Hawk
Gaint Ravens
@@jaisanatanrashtra7035 Insult?
@@nyjilthebirdtrebuchet1990 deinonychus was the only one that had feathers in this video and he is the height of a harpy in terms of height so technically he is not that giant. Many say that dinosaurs with feathers are not frightening then ... Why not see behind a casuarius? 😂😂
2245: dinosaurs are a whole new type of animal
@@jaisanatanrashtra7035 a giant chicken is still scary, if it's not then why anne and sprig running away from it in amphibia opening?
Mosasaurus looks cool in both versions 2:01
One brilliant question: What If all the dinosaurs look like in 1850s?
Example: Halzskaraptor, Thanos simonattoi and Bistahieversor?
Iguanadon is such a classic dinosaur
0:18 creature from Spy kids 2 😂
Ayee lol
Ngl, the 1860s elasmosaurus looks very cool...
Neat, i like the improvment since the last version you did ! Although i think "2020s" should still be "2010s" since the 2020s have barely started, especially considering the recent rethinking about Megalosauridae's place within Theropoda (potentially more closely related to allosauridae i believe, i'm not an expert though but, the point still stands i think that we don't know what exciting stuff will happen in the 2020s yet.) Perhaps another option could be to give precise years maybe, to show exactly when such shifts took place ?
yeah, it was tricky in some cases to choose between 2010s or 2020s. Spinosaurus is clearly 2020s, but the decade just started and still has a lot to bring to the table. For other cases like Tyrannosaurus or Megalosaurus I was about to label them as 2010s, but I think that what is more characteristic of that decade for theropods in general was the heavy feathering, which now changed to something more moderate. But in any case the lines are also blurry between other decades on this matter, like from the 1920s to the 1960s, the general view of dinosaurs didn't change much. It's an approximation
0:56
Thanks Cope, I hate it.
the 1860 elasmosaurus looks crappy
@@remylebarh5426 nah, it doens't. it's way better than the 2010 version. the 2010 version looks like a wannabe-diplodocus with a small head and with a fish body
@@mariaclarh99 bruh, at least it's more accurate. Cope's version looks like a generic, giant lizard that grew flippers instead of legs and feet or in other words, a wannabe mosasaur. The more accurate Elasmosaurus reconstruction shows a unique marine animal, one with a long neck.
But that's your opinion so ok.
Marsh: me too, I hate it too
0:43- Hey is the "Sneak-A-Saurus!
Took 2 minutes and 54 seconds for the beat to really drop
Ottimo lavoro di correzione paleontologa... specie lo spinosaurus. Universitario con tanto di laurea, giusto?
1:08
Dang when Godzilla was real.
I want more of this pleaseeee🦕🦖
I love the Dinosaurs Through ages💚💘🤎🤎🦖❤️❤️😘😍🥰❤️
Spinosaurus 2020 was the weirdest😂
2020 Spinosaurus become a fish-eater than meat-eater
It would have been cool if the 1880s stego was real (although as a completely different dinosaur from Stegosaurus), as a highly derived basal sauropodomorph or basal thyreophoran resembling this outdated stego reconstruction. :D
It so weird to think thats dinosaur might not actually look like thats instead something very different and we will never khow
Unlikely
@@darkonyx6995 pretty likely
If I could rename the Iguanadon, I would call it the thumbs-uposaurus.
2:37 🤣🤣🤣
Here is a classification based on their shapes:brontosaurus-sauropod megalosaurus-Theropoda elasmosaurus-plesiosauria stegosaurus-herbivora deinonychus-dromaeosauridae iguanodon-ornithopoda mososaurus-Mososauridae tyrannosaurus-theropoda pterodactylus-pterodactyla spinosaurus-theropoda oviraptor-oviraptora
Imagina como hubiese sido Jurassic Park si los dinosaurios hubiesen sido asi
Great art fam!
Isn’t it crazy that stegosaurus used to look like this 1:11 in the 1880s?!
It looks like godzilla
Please do Part 2 of this i really like it also did deinonychus really looked like a sparrow without its beak also i never thought that there was a time when oviraptor was thought to be a scally Lizard Very cool
I'm glad you didn't put feathers on the T rex
I wish it would have shown more decades in between, but still a great video.
I love your channel and dinosaurs
Excellent video, especially for the high quality of the representations of the dinosaurs as living animals. In fact, these renderings of Mario Lanzas are so good and realistic that even the "wrong models" look like completely believable animals that could very well have existed. Very few paleoartists are capable of putting so much effort into a representation that has already been dismissed by science as obsolete. How I would like to have this series of the evolution of our artistic interpretations of dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures in a good paleoart book! It's great to have them in a TH-cam video, sure, but for me, a real book would be more appropriate.
As a suggestion, I think that in some cases, an extra illustration would be necessary to have a more complete idea of the evolution of our conception of some of these animals. That is to say, each animal is represented in the video with two or three images that show as many versions of its scientific interpretation, but I think that some needed four images, and in some cases, perhaps up to five, to fully show the evolution of their image proposed by science (for example, an image was missing from the very recent interpretation of Spinosaurus as completely quadrupedal, or one of Apatosaurus from the 80s-90s, when it no longer dragged its tail, but still did not have the thick neck with which it is represented today).
I hope that over time, these series can grow and increase the number of dinosaurs represented, and (if necessary) the number of versions of each.
Thank you!
I have plans to make at least a second part :)