1. Cantwell v Connecticut (1940) 0:20 2. West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette (1943) 2:08 3.Abrams v United States (1919) 3:39 4. New York Times v Sullivan (1964) 5:58 5 The Pentagon Papers case, aka New York Times Co. v United States (1971) 9:08
(I haven't pushed play yet), but why does it matter what "Court Rulings" say? The Courts don't define what the Bill of Rights say, the Bill of Rights are quite clear and if a Court's ruling doesn't follow what it says, then that Judge should be impeached and removed from the bench. The Bill of Rights are pretty clear to me.
A note to the amendments, ANYTHING can changed, no matter what all of you think. Men constructed all aspects of the constitution and men can change any portion of it.
M Sherwood that would make them privileges, not rights. A right exists regardless of legality. And keep in mind that civil disobedience, jury nullification, and good ole armed insurrection do a great job of preventing or suppressing such things
Yes, it could happen, but it wouldn’t be the same U.S anymore if missing any of these fundamental rights and I don’t think it would be the best shot at freedom anymore, it would lose that characteristic which America has
I was in FB jail for quoting a line from a movie. Then I got in FB jail for simply staying my own opinion. I am starting to think that people's rights are being taken away!
3:00 is why I as a canadian love this imperfect but not at all horrible country. Let me in. Or at least make mid term elections a nafta condition for our federal legislators. Our prime minister really needs a win right now. Is it possible for canada to adopt the model of "untouchable" rights? What would be the consequences of a shared supreme court, bad and good?
Religious freedom was about encouraging the worship of the one and only GOD by not favoring one religion over another, it was not about encouraging the worship of any idol. And freedom of speech, the freedom to assemble, etc, the founders had something kind of noble in mind🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I love Americans. XD "We need to make sure people know that this is secret, but not just secret, like, UBER SECRET. What should we call this?" "Top Secret." "...that's genius."
This reminds me of the current pressure on the NFL to force players to stand during the National Anthem. First, any intelligent person would realize, requiring that of players would certainly become a 1st Amendment case and the NFL would lose! Secondly, it shows the President and his base have no understanding of the 1st Amendment or our Constitution.
Becky VanMeter A private employer (NFL) has an absolute right to restrict the speech of its employees (the players) in the workplace. Other professional sports leagues have personal conduct clauses that deal directly with this issue. Employers restrict workplace speech (and sometimes “outside the workplace” speech) everyday. It sounds like YOU have no understanding of the 1st Amendment.
@@triplebsjackson8868 The NFL had no issue w kneeling players until the President attempted to over impress his executive powers. His intimidation eventually did affect
1. Cantwell v Connecticut (1940) 0:20
2. West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette (1943) 2:08
3.Abrams v United States (1919) 3:39
4. New York Times v Sullivan (1964) 5:58
5 The Pentagon Papers case, aka New York Times Co. v United States (1971) 9:08
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is extremely important. And it applies to everyone.
What are the top 5 international implications? With cases if possible. Thank you for any contribution.
Thanks OG
(I haven't pushed play yet), but why does it matter what "Court Rulings" say? The Courts don't define what the Bill of Rights say, the Bill of Rights are quite clear and if a Court's ruling doesn't follow what it says, then that Judge should be impeached and removed from the bench. The Bill of Rights are pretty clear to me.
What are you getting at? Are there rulings you disagree with? If so, which and in what grounds?
A note to the amendments, ANYTHING can changed, no matter what all of you think. Men constructed all aspects of the constitution and men can change any portion of it.
M Sherwood that would make them privileges, not rights. A right exists regardless of legality. And keep in mind that civil disobedience, jury nullification, and good ole armed insurrection do a great job of preventing or suppressing such things
Yes, it could happen, but it wouldn’t be the same U.S anymore if missing any of these fundamental rights and I don’t think it would be the best shot at freedom anymore, it would lose that characteristic which America has
Well, are the citizens allowed to film if you are pulled over by the police? Until this gets overturned, I wanna know exactly what this ruling means.
Excellent lesson's and the last being an inevitable national embarrassment for the "Nixon Administration."
7:30 that'll never change , probably just 'adjust' itself according to the times.
I was in FB jail for quoting a line from a movie. Then I got in FB jail for simply staying my own opinion. I am starting to think that people's rights are being taken away!
3:00 is why I as a canadian love this imperfect but not at all horrible country. Let me in. Or at least make mid term elections a nafta condition for our federal legislators.
Our prime minister really needs a win right now.
Is it possible for canada to adopt the model of "untouchable" rights? What would be the consequences of a shared supreme court, bad and good?
One of the greatest Americans that ever lived was a French Canadian, John Garand, creator of the M1 Garand...Thank you!!!!!
How’s Bill C-16 going? Look up Jordan Peterson Bill C-16
Religious freedom was about encouraging the worship of the one and only GOD by not favoring one religion over another, it was not about encouraging the worship of any idol. And freedom of speech, the freedom to assemble, etc, the founders had something kind of noble in mind🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I love Americans. XD
"We need to make sure people know that this is secret, but not just secret, like, UBER SECRET. What should we call this?"
"Top Secret."
"...that's genius."
I need a lawyer for Freedom of Speech 😂
This reminds me of the current pressure on the NFL to force players to stand during the National Anthem. First, any intelligent person would realize, requiring that of players would certainly become a 1st Amendment case and the NFL would lose! Secondly, it shows the President and his base have no understanding of the 1st Amendment or our Constitution.
Becky VanMeter A private employer (NFL) has an absolute right to restrict the speech of its employees (the players) in the workplace. Other professional sports leagues have personal conduct clauses that deal directly with this issue. Employers restrict workplace speech (and sometimes “outside the workplace” speech) everyday. It sounds like YOU have no understanding of the 1st Amendment.
The country isn't saying that NFL players have to stand it's the NFL so it doesn't matter
@@triplebsjackson8868 The NFL had no issue w kneeling players until the President attempted to over impress his executive powers. His intimidation eventually did affect
The NFL is a privare org...1st admin does not apply.....NFL makes their own policy
You're dumb, beckers
I need representation
This guy make me sleep ...... we need a more straight up video that explains basic concepts!
Murray vs. Curlett.