Landmark Supreme Court Cases 3.11

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 269

  • @panicked_pastel8671
    @panicked_pastel8671 8 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    This is great. Its exactly what I need to study and I am so fortunate I came across it. Thank you.

  • @VixyHoloTails
    @VixyHoloTails 4 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Supreme Court cases in the order they are talked about:
    Marbury v Madison 1:14
    Plessy v Ferguson 4:07
    Brown v Board of Education 5:52
    In re' Gault 7:18
    Tinker v Des Moines 8:59
    Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier 10:00
    Gideon v Wainright 11:17
    Miranda v Arizona 11:56
    United States v Nixon 13:18
    Bush v Gore 14:23
    D.C. v Heller 15:41

  • @isat523
    @isat523 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    seven years later and i’ve been assigned to watch this. to be honest as an autistic adhd kid this has kept my attention pretty great

  • @jnnn5760
    @jnnn5760 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Im taking my FCLE tomorrow, and I was so confused about these cases! This video was such a great help, thank you so much!!

    • @2002raymond
      @2002raymond ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks so much for saying so. So happy to hear! Mr Ray

  • @abby626
    @abby626 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Who has to do this because of online school corona timeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • @dr.debbiewilliams
    @dr.debbiewilliams ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've already been arguing them to the Supreme Court and was invited to join the Supreme Court Bar Association. I am already a member of the American Bar Association. My children never did that.

  • @vyncent4020
    @vyncent4020 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Sending thanks from FL :) These videos help me so much

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks so much from saying so! I'm FLA too. Miami... Happy holidays!

  • @p.goldman1885
    @p.goldman1885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Your videos are perfect for PRE-Teaching, Remediation, and REVIEW. EXCELLENT! So glad you created them. You Rock!

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks so much!! Hope you are having a great year. I'm ready for summer break! :)

  • @anysiagamez1184
    @anysiagamez1184 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for taking the time to post this video. Needed it.

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for saying so Anysia! I hope you are having a great year! Mr. Raymond

  • @davidruiz3859
    @davidruiz3859 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you!! now I know wayyyyyyyy more! I can do way better on my history test tomorrow

  • @jamilahmed5335
    @jamilahmed5335 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    wow this really helps alot! the Supreme Court cases were the things i struggled at. Thanks Mr. Raymond!

  • @Mainiritika5
    @Mainiritika5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you so much for your time to make this. This was soooo helpful ❤❤❤❤❤

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are so welcome! Thank you for commenting! Mr. Raymond

  • @veraniasosa9850
    @veraniasosa9850 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I learned that Brown v. Board of Education overturned the verdict of Plessy v. Ferguson in relation to the 14th amendment. From "separate but equal" to "equal protection under the law."

  • @satiomarov2442
    @satiomarov2442 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi, Mr. Raymond! I learned that the amendment that Plessy, Brown and Gault have in common is the 14th amendment

  • @its_bob535
    @its_bob535 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Omg I love history!!! ❤❤ 😊

  • @julietazamora7264
    @julietazamora7264 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi Mr.Raymond I did the guided notes and watched the video I learned that if a law goes against the constitution the Supreme can declare it null and void.

  • @melindastuart-tilley6033
    @melindastuart-tilley6033 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi! I teach political science. This was a really great and helpful video, but I noticed a few mistakes. For Marbury v. Madison, I think you meant to say the Judiciary Act of 1789 instead of 1783. In addition, Plessy v. Ferguson was decided in 1896, not 1890. Also, the picture you had for Gault (about the obscene phone calls in the 1950s) actually features pictures of Eric Smith, the child murderer (from the 1990s), which could be confusing! Thank you again for the video.

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ugh yeah, this was when I first started making videos... and definitely should have done more proofreading of my slides... I'm going to have to remake them soon as the state is changing the standards these videos were made for... For now I'm teaching high school AP Gov and those videos definitely have the right dates :) Thanks for reaching out. Jeff Raymond

  • @Patiyoe
    @Patiyoe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    this online school is killing me and I don't know how to breathe anymore

  • @alejandrorivera4239
    @alejandrorivera4239 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hi mr raymond i did the guided notes and i learned that if a law goes against the consitution the supreme court can declare it "null & void"

  • @Ssgmfs
    @Ssgmfs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow thank you, I’m studying for my social studies teacher cert test and this was very helpful as a review!

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh excellent!!! Glad they are helping!! I had to take the math test four times :(.... and I don't teach math!!

    • @Ssgmfs
      @Ssgmfs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrRaymondSocialStudies I hope I don’t have to take the test multiple times. But when it’s time for me to do the math test I bet I’ll have to take it a lot as well.

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ssgmfs haha!! Yeah... I don't think they still do it... Anyway, welcome to the wonderful world of teaching! Best job in the world. Feel free to reach out anytime!

  • @sofialeva8652
    @sofialeva8652 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    the video was interesting Mr Raymond i learn more about the supreme court landmark cases i all ready did the guided notes

  • @thetrueauthor4210
    @thetrueauthor4210 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you. I appreciate this video

  • @adventuresofgaara8936
    @adventuresofgaara8936 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am Abraham Rodriguez, from 5th period, i learned that the amendment that Plessy, Brown and Gault have in common is the 14th amendment.

  • @dianacristancho4646
    @dianacristancho4646 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I learned that Brown vs the Board of Education overturned Plessy vs Ferguson by saying that separate but equal in schools is unconstitutional.

  • @CrowSkvlls
    @CrowSkvlls 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank you so much for this my teacher had given this to us and since i was gone almost the entire week we were learning this it was a great help.

  • @raulmartinez1646
    @raulmartinez1646 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    the fact this is still being used in history classes today 😂

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And will be for a long time to come Raul!... You know... with new ones

  • @nelsonbradley7502
    @nelsonbradley7502 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can you do the updated landmark cases

  • @edwarddemedeiros3607
    @edwarddemedeiros3607 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome! I love these videos. Thanks so much for what you do.

  • @ivisvilato5139
    @ivisvilato5139 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video helps so much i'm so grateful i have a test next weekend about this and this video just helped me a lot

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope you did well! Thanks for your kind words! Mr. Raymond

  • @hyojinlee
    @hyojinlee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for this great video!

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for the kind words Hyo! Hope you have great summer! Mr. Raymond

  • @ryanhernandez339
    @ryanhernandez339 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i learned how many supreme court justices there are

  • @calebbazan9932
    @calebbazan9932 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Judicial Review - The power to say whether any federal, state or local law or goverment action goes agains the constitution.

  • @gabrielsole1418
    @gabrielsole1418 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Mr.Raymond what I learned is that a petition of writing of certiorari I'd filed when a Supreme Court asks to review a decision of a lower case.

  • @Tanager5000account
    @Tanager5000account 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I learned that most cases come to the supreme court under the argument of equal protection of the law.

  • @gallineta1000
    @gallineta1000 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you I was just watching it for fun lol it's been 2 years since the AP exam

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ha, thanks Basszilda!! I'm sure you did great on the exam! Happy holidays!! Mr. Raymond

  • @casildaarellanes3723
    @casildaarellanes3723 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    4/9 justices must vote to hear a case

  • @scarpaz
    @scarpaz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very interesting video. Thanks for making it.
    Just pointing out that "in re" does not mean "in reference to". Re is not an abbreviation or a truncation, and it needs no apostrophe. It is Latin for "thing" (lookup res). "In re" should be translated as "in the matter...".

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, thanks, Daniele! Shows what my four years of Latin did for me!

  • @FranklinThe1
    @FranklinThe1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    mr raymond is the goat

  • @maxblum4742
    @maxblum4742 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I learned that 9 justices serve on the US Supreme Court

  • @turniptrekking9082
    @turniptrekking9082 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a big civics test today! Wish me luck :p

  • @uncannyresemblance
    @uncannyresemblance 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this review truly a godsend 🙏

  • @liashaw3642
    @liashaw3642 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I learned that Judicial review is a major check on the other two branches!

  • @oscarlacayo288
    @oscarlacayo288 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "Seperate but equal" means it legalized segregation

  • @Yoel-s
    @Yoel-s 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    my teacher just sent me this and it helped me a lot

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the kind words Yoel! Hope you have great summer! Mr. Raymond

  • @carolinanaranjo2934
    @carolinanaranjo2934 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned that in Tinker vs. Des Moines, speech is more than just words. Watched it

  • @jacobschiff4087
    @jacobschiff4087 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I learned the power of judicial review

  • @santiagogana1679
    @santiagogana1679 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hi im santiago gana i did the guided notes (not in coachs room) and i learned that if a law goes against the constitution the supreme court can declare it null and void

  • @gamplaysxd1712
    @gamplaysxd1712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Useful video never seen before

  • @kesselsauer4441
    @kesselsauer4441 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you mr raymond, very cool

  • @sofiahimiob6467
    @sofiahimiob6467 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned how specific court cases had to do with certain amendments. For example: Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, and In re' Gault all had to do with the 14th Amendment.

  • @katearias3068
    @katearias3068 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I learned that if a law is unconstitutional, the supreme court can then declare it "null & void"

  • @isabellamozzi801
    @isabellamozzi801 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I learned that if a law is or goes AGAINST the constitution the supreme court has the power to declare it as "null or void"

  • @martitribo
    @martitribo 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi Mr Raymond I watched the video and did the guided notes

  • @mirandabuhler4206
    @mirandabuhler4206 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hi mr raymond i did the guided notes and i learned that the president chooses justices and the senate confirms them

  • @Ollie-Oh
    @Ollie-Oh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i learn that i won't give up on my dream!
    thanks to u i will become an FBI

  • @eduardopons6559
    @eduardopons6559 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I learned that the Supreme Court has to have a unanimous decision to hear a case

  • @marcowortel2224
    @marcowortel2224 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Mr Raymond I'm Marco and I learned that the president makes justices and the Senate approves them

  • @babyfacekarol
    @babyfacekarol 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for this video i really needed this

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for saying so!!! I hope you are having a great year!! Mr. Raymond

    • @babyfacekarol
      @babyfacekarol 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      no thank you

  • @lucs2889
    @lucs2889 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi Mr Raymond, i did my guided notes and I learned that if a law goes against the constitution, the supreme court can declare it "null and void". The guided notes where TOOO long :(.

  • @jamesa4794
    @jamesa4794 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned that Supreme Court justices serve for life

  • @nilbertran850
    @nilbertran850 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks for the video

  • @amanda_davila
    @amanda_davila 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How would you describe Bush vs. Gore? Will it be ok if I write “Split Supreme Court hands busy presidential victory”?

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry... Know this is probably too late... Most controversial aspect is that a federal/national court decided the procedures for a state election. Even for presidential or national political positions, states are the ones who decide the rules and procedures for holding elections. (The federal government has stepped in with voting laws.) Some people thought the Supreme Court, which overruled the Florida Supreme Court, should have stayed out of it.

  • @Francobattilana
    @Francobattilana 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did it Mr. Raymond and I learned that the president chooses justices and the senate confirms them.

  • @tht_shantelly
    @tht_shantelly 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    my civics eoc is the 16 and this helped

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Shantelly R Thanks for saying so Shantelly!! Good luck. You're going to do great!! Mr. Raymond

  • @danielmcdonald3642
    @danielmcdonald3642 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU!!!

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for thanking me, Daniel! I hope you are having a great year! Mr. Raymond

  • @jessiewilliams1045
    @jessiewilliams1045 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You said that in Heller v D.C., justices appointed by Republicans voted in favor of Heller and justices appointed by Democrats voted in favor of D.C.. John Paul Stevens (voted in favor of D.C.) was appointed by Republican President Gerald Ford and David Souter (voted in favor of D.C.) was appointed by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Other than that, it was a GREAT video.

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good catch Jessie. I realized after that I hadn't fact checked that and was just stupidly speaking off the cuff! Thanks for the feedback! Mr. Raymond

  • @jilliannordhagen475
    @jilliannordhagen475 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I learned that the plessy vs. ferguson had the 14th amendment in commoen. I did the guided notes.

    • @jilliannordhagen475
      @jilliannordhagen475 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I also learned that ernesto miranda's lawyers argued that he did not know that he had the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent (self incrimination).

  • @niconico7504
    @niconico7504 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video my guy

  • @frankdigiglio7067
    @frankdigiglio7067 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi mr raymond its frank. I learned that brown v board of education extended 14 amendment guarantee of equal protecction under the law

  • @jocelynecorrea735
    @jocelynecorrea735 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned that Plessy, Brown, and Gault all have the 14th amendment in common

  • @victoriagarcia2637
    @victoriagarcia2637 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I did the guided notes I learned that if law goes against the constitution the Supreme Court can declare it null and void

  • @ian_w19
    @ian_w19 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i did my guided notes and I learned that if a law goes against the constitution, the supreme court can declare it null and void

  • @allstaroman
    @allstaroman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    who is else is watching this for there civics teacher :/

  • @yailinpichardo7200
    @yailinpichardo7200 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Subscribed!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @saratommasini8225
    @saratommasini8225 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi mr Raymond if a law goes against the constitution the supreme can declare it null and void

  • @hopelabrada7210
    @hopelabrada7210 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi mr.raymond saw your awsome video and i learned that
    bush v gore and u.s v nixion were ruling on the exsecutive branch

  • @alemercado1751
    @alemercado1751 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i learned what dc vs keller was, allowed everyone to carry guns for self defense; I'm emailing you the Guided notes

  • @louisboucard4349
    @louisboucard4349 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    yo ray ray, i learned that the supreme court is part of the judicial branch and that in the articles of confederation there was no judicial branch.

  • @Plantpuffbaby
    @Plantpuffbaby 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned that Miranda did not know that he had the right to remain silent in Miranda vs. Arizona.

  • @betsycarbonell9706
    @betsycarbonell9706 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i learned that judicial review is the judicial branches biggest check on the legislative and and executive branches

  • @brandonslavescu8579
    @brandonslavescu8579 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I learned that Plessy vs Ferguson and Brown vs Board of Education helped establish the 14tg amendment

  • @christianbickford1007
    @christianbickford1007 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey mr Raymond I saw your video. I learned the heller vs D.C. Was a win for the 2nd amendment

  • @FirstnameLastname-qf2vm
    @FirstnameLastname-qf2vm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hold up. U skipped Bush v Gore. That's the good stuff man lol

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I know... They took it off the exam. I used to teach it. It is a good one!

  • @gamplaysxd1712
    @gamplaysxd1712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ll recommend to everybody

  • @santisanchez3919
    @santisanchez3919 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did the guided notes and i learned that if a law goes against the constitution the supreme can declare it null and void.

  • @anamichelena271
    @anamichelena271 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I learned that Brown v. Board of education was the case that extended the 14th amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law.

  • @jaylenchampagne9728
    @jaylenchampagne9728 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    y'all really disliking this video because your teacher sent you here😭

    • @edwardelrock1485
      @edwardelrock1485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      lmao

    • @ssagetastic
      @ssagetastic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@edwardelrock1485 AHAHA I FOUND YOU

    • @That_Fella44
      @That_Fella44 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ssagetastic woah,I watching these in 3/10/2021, its 6:55

    • @edwardelrock1485
      @edwardelrock1485 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ssagetastic you found me woah

    • @jayden-tq2hj
      @jayden-tq2hj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      omg it's a barb heyyy

  • @valentinodinatale8537
    @valentinodinatale8537 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I watched i did it in mrs. D the judicial branch has a check on executive and legislative

  • @ChucksNPearls
    @ChucksNPearls 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is it that Family Courts don't honor any of these? Such deceit to the public!

    • @timeno1763
      @timeno1763 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please explain?

  • @annacastellanoo
    @annacastellanoo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i watched the video and did the guided notes, i learned that the supreme court has 9 justices.

  • @martinacanatelli5302
    @martinacanatelli5302 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned that the amendment that Plessy, Brown and Gault, all have in common is the 14th amendment.

  • @guilleabella3874
    @guilleabella3874 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned there are 9 supreme court justices and they serve for life.

  • @taylornicole1034
    @taylornicole1034 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned that the President appoints Supreme Court Justices and the Senate approves them.

  • @alejandramalavenda9153
    @alejandramalavenda9153 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I learned that judicial review is the power to say whether a law or government action goes against the constitution.

  • @Wherearetheghosts
    @Wherearetheghosts 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    who's doing Mrs seiverts guided notes last minute

  • @MagicAl56
    @MagicAl56 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your history on Heller is incorrect. Both justices Souter and Stevens were Republicans.
    Justice J.P. Stevens was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Gerald Ford, a Republican. Stevens was from a branch of the Republican party that was called the Rockefeller Republicans. They were generally conservative on economic and foreign policy, but preferred that the party stay out of the social issues that defined the Goldwater/Reagan Republicans and those that came after them, and supporting civil rights when the Republican Party was turning against them.
    Justice Souter was nominated to the Supreme Court by President George Bush Sr., a Republican. He was seen as having a reputation as being tough at sentencing, but otherwise little was known about him outside of New Hampshire, which is probably what President Bush was looking for after the disasterous failed nomination of Robert Bork. He ended up being more in line with Stevens, voing on the liberal side on social and civil rights issues.
    Admittedly many members of the Republican party grew to regret these choices, but they were both Republicans when they joined the court, were both appointed by Republican Presidents, and both considered themselves lifelong Republicans.

    • @MrRaymondSocialStudies
      @MrRaymondSocialStudies  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know someone pointed that out to me a while ago... So embarrasing... That's when I stopped freestyling videos and started writing scripts. I totally threw that comment in without even thinking about it. IDK why TH-cam won't let me edit it out but...

  • @ushib9368
    @ushib9368 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Factual correction, justices Stevens and Souter were nominated by republican presidents and not by democratic presidents as stated in the video.

  • @ryanmichot8329
    @ryanmichot8329 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned that the right to free speech also involves clothing, especially related to protest during the Vietnam war.

  • @mrkaiman3052
    @mrkaiman3052 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sorry not created 14th amendment but used it his “statement”

  • @That_Fella44
    @That_Fella44 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got my 3rd quarter civics test tom,im nervous,shout out to those whos watching this in 3/10/2021 or 2021