Check out a free trial of Wondershare Filmora X: bit.ly/3eLwgnE . 30% Discount Code : SENBR30 GIVEAWAY: Comment using #createwithFilmora to share what do you think of Filmora to win 1-year free Wondershare Filmora license.
@Jordan Harawa try to play your team narrow which will cause the opposition team to come narrow as well which would cause your fullbacks or wingers to have space for crosses or opportunities to score. And playing narrow is also good for counter pressing and winning the ball back
Conte was such a revolution bringing the 3 at the back tactic to the Premier League, barely anyone use it before him, but after him, a lot clubs also start using it
@@finding_aether Very true. But it was a one off in a final. Although, Pochettino's Spurs did use the 3-4-3 relatively frequently before Conte's arrival.
I think Tuchel would have more goals per game than Conte if he had a striker like Diego Costa because we are attacking and creating more under him. I miss Diego Costa so much 😪
Great video! Both Conte & Tuchel are implement “positional play” in their systems, but the difference was in their use of possession. Conte’s attack focused more on automatisms and pre-planned attacking moves and we saw this consistently with the way hazard, costa and Pedro linked up. Tuchel’s attack hasn’t fully clicked, but is more fluid and highly flexible with constant rotations among the forward players. On paper, Conte’s 343 is quite rigid and turns into a 325 in attack as a basic 343 would. Tuchel’s 343 is flexible with Mount & Havertz being key to that tactical flexibility. Both hybrid players, Mount can perform as either a no.8/no.10 while Havertz can also play as a no.9/10. Tuchel’s 343 can seamlessly transition into a 352 with mount dropping into the midfield to form a trio with Jorginho and Kante as Werner & Havertz reposition to form a front two if the need arises during a game. Tuchel’s versatility means Chelsea can be adaptable and can move between a 343 and 352 without having to make a substitution while Conte’s was more rigid. In my opinion, Tuchel has more aces up his sleeve because he isn’t wedded to the 343 like Conte and could also lineup Chelsea in a back 4 next season. Tuchel said “he will build a team that no one wants to play against” and if winning the UCL is the starting point for this team, the potential is truly scary under Tuchel. Great analysis once again!
Exactly. This is what I have been trying to explain to people. Even with Tuchel we could revolt to a 4 back while even playing the 3 back. Have you noticed in some games Rudiger step away from center back to join in the midfield?
TT has the benefit of a very bloated squad to select from as another way of stating he has a lot of aces up his sleeve. Head to head, I would give the edge to Conte due to him having Costa as a trump card. Hopefully, TT can get a striker like Costa was into the squad and be all the better for for it. With the way our board operates however, it’s never a guarantee that they’ll back any manager.
@@876jamaicanyouth They were providing width but the ball would remain with back 3, we would wait for team to press us then Luiz would make a long pass, Kante always sat back to block passing lanes, Costa was very strong to hold defenders and let Hazard n Pedro ran rampant. It didn't work next season cos Morata couldn't occupy defenders, thats y Conte wanted lukaku so bad. In Tuchel system, its more about possession and Reece and Chillwell keeps pressing the wingers, mount and kante keep pressing the midfield and Werner despite missing chances drags out the defenders which creates gap in the middle for Havertz/Pullisic/Ziyech whoever playing. So u can see the two systems are different.
@@rickygervaissaidhi2524 playing from the back is the most important transformation between these two teams. While you mentioned a very important issue, the other one is jorgi based playing from the back with consistently fresh wbs. Conte suffered heavily due to the speed of wbs in 2nd season also. Tt played azpi,Emerson,cho, Ben,Alonso,RJ in wbs in less then half season which not only created a cohesive environment in the dressing room (same with wingers), but gave speed down the flanks constantly. You can study pep's utilization of rotating flanks. I knew conte was doing that wrong and the board also didn't back him. Klopp is the most cunning of them all , he literally uses cup games to freshen up in between. But I predicted the uprising and downfall correctly for him. I am highly waiting for what will he do next ? Tried to push youth /stamina already last season (Chelsea's lamps formula) . But I highly doubt the consistency with the quality. Chessboards doesn't count fitness unfortunately.
@@maruf2050 I think the issue with gegenpress is eventually you just murder the players. They need a deeper squad or what happened last season will happen again.
I think Conte revived the 3-back formation but Tuchel evolved it to adapt to false nine and so many other key functions. Could you do a tactical analysis of Nuno and what he can bring to Tottenham?
Yea conte wanted Vidal for matic, lukaku for Costa and Vvd for Luiz as replacements. Board didn't support him and he was forced to play ultra defensive without attacking strength. I hope the board backs Tuchel this time and looks like they want to.
Main difference for me was Conte's use of the wingers (Alonso and Moses) driving up field,,,, and Tuchel's classy use of the midfield : the defence could easily switch midfield and the midfielders could readily assist the front 3.
That background tract is what plays in kante's head when he is running like crazy to come from behind and put in an immaculate tackle .......a tackle so clean the atacker doesnt even want to pretend he was fouled
@@orton305 Played Kante in a more advanced role because he saw the talent he had. Got a lot of flack from English media who only thought of Kante as a 6 and not an 8. I think Zola spoke about this once on TV
TT CFC system is a mix of Conte's 3 at the back system and Sarri's possession based attacking football. Can only hope he stays longer than the other 2.
Conte's system was attacking and had alot of exciting play. Probably because you had Hazard and Costa and experience of Fabregas and Pedro. Tuchel may lack the attacking firepower but has the most Solid defence and flexibility of play. Just one CF away from total domination
There seemed to be a weakness in Conte's methods/patterns for playing out from the back. So much so that teams in the second season were ready for the patterns and pressed high with success. Tuchel's methods/patterns for playing out seem more flexible and varied making it harder for teams to exert the high press successfully.
Cesar azipilicueta a mad respect for him he has played under 8 managers changed positions and never benched no one talks about him he is the most udnerrated defender in epl
Perhaps the reason Tuchel’s team didn’t score a lot of goals last season was as you pointed out, most teams didn’t press and therefore less space in behind for the attackers to run in behind..I trust Tuchel to come up with something this season though, he’s a smart guy
Conte is a master at this formation and has gotten it to work very well for multiple teams while also adapting to their strengths and weaknesses. Tuchel, on the other hand, tries too hard to modernize this formation through the constant rotation among the players' positions at the front and that had created more problems for Chelse than it did good.
If these two faced each other I think it would be a really tough, low scoring game as both defences are strong but Diego Costa would make the difference. He was key to us winning so many points, a clutch player that could score from nothing
Conte is a world class coach. We need more people like him in modern day football. Give him what he wants and he will deliver. His focus is more on football tactics and less on man management. That's how it should be.
To be fair I've seen Christensen doing what D.Luiz used to do specially when the opposition was focusing more on Jorginho. Also I'm sure that Matic was more rigid and stayed back in comparison to Kante just like Jorginho stays more back while Kante has more freedom.
I think if tuchel finds a way for making our attacking players fire all cylinders then we could become a force to reckon with for a long long time and also tuchel's Chelsea is definitely superior to conte's !
Rubbish....what you are saying make no sense....a coach does not coach his team to miss guild edge Chances. If we had converted 3/4 of our chances we would have ended up above Man Utd. We created more chances than most big clubs in Europe but miss a lot. Tuchel system is so fluid how it bamboozle Pep many times becuz he cannot press a team that play close football . Tuchel system will take out of the first 80m but the last 20m when we get chances to score is a problem. We need Haaland who will make things happen.
I can't say its superior, cause that 2016/17 side was one of the best Chelsea sides I have seen, if only Costa and Matic(his partnership with Kante was perfect) stayed with Chelsea , then it would ve been a 3 horse race between Chelsea ,Liverpool and City in the past 4 seasons
This is fascinating to look back on now that Conte's at Spurs, still playing with two more defensive minded midfielders but with Kane and Son in place of Costa and Hazard, which means subtle changes in style. Next season will be really interesting.
Nice video! An aspect not talked about is shot conversion from last year under Frank and TT, vs Conte w Diego Costa. Conversion of the many chances we create is why we're about to slap big money down for Haaland.
I think we can also add Alonso as a player who featured under both managers. Chilwell is for the long term but Alonso is a tremendous LWB who causes a lot of problems for opposition defences with his raids forward. The signing of Lukaku gives us another dimension in unlocking deep defensive systems.
the biggest mistake Chelsea made is to sake Conte. the biggest decision Chelsea made is to hire Tuchel. well, now I will start watching Chelsea back again then.
@@Lsx_g conte got sacked coz Chelsea want to appoint sarri. Conte had said in the media, Chelsea made a mistake when appoint sarri because conte have more titles than sarri at that time
Reece James will likely play RCB. Its already been reported that's where Tuchel envisions him. Tuchel also has no problem using attacking wings if his two pivot-6's are defensively resolute. Pulisic and CHO have both played in those outside slots normally reserved for James/Azpi/Chilwell/Alonso.
Conte’s 3 atb was more safe and reliable without any pressing structure which suited well with Chelsea’s defence format of park the bus…whereas Tuchel’s 3 atb was very agressive and always looking to create free passing lanes and have majority of the ball, this was helped on by his rotation of his attack.
The fact Chelsea fans have been so blessed to watch both Conte and Tuchel is madness meanwhile SOME Clubs staying with a manager for 2-4 years... Chelsea model is Ruthless but 10000% Proven Results
Kante, Kova and Jorginho are the difference. Their ability to control the midfield protects the back three. Tuchel’s stallball tactic after an attack proves an offense that is at rest tends to stay at rest.
There is no one like Conte.He is real godfather.As a Chelsea fan I always want to see him back in Chelsea hot seat.The management did not co-operate with him as they are doing now with Tuchel
Excellent break down of 2 great managers tactics. Would be beneficial to have quotes from those managers about their tactics to strengthen your arguments/ interpretation of their football approach.
Tuchels team is a lot younger in middle and forwards, so the young lads have the pace to play end to end football. Defending and tackling is the key here. Watch highlight of Werner dending and getting into counter attack for the 1st goal in the 2-0 win against Atletico Madrid in the cl.
In order to beat chelsea next game with man city. What should guoardiola do and avoid to not put man city in embarrassment situation as he used to do always. How he can stop chelsea from building upand especially controlling their midfielders?
In today’s premiere league where a pacy winger often makes the day A three central defenders reinforced by two pacy corner backs is the answer. Main difference between Conte and Tuchel is the latter believes in keeping the ball in the opponent’s half hence the high pressing and aggressive use of Kante. We will see a different front three tactics when a proper center forward arrives
I liked Conte's side better because of the verticality in attack, use of a more rigid front 3 and the style of defending. I also like Tuchel's tactics as it is one of the least boring possession based sides. Also we are quite solid defensively especially towards the end of the season.
Tuchels midfield squeeze horizontslly in position. You'll often see Kante playing small one two's with the right wing back and right forward to progress the ball
Why Chelsea play so good? Because Chelsea have 3 central defenders close the two holding midfielders relating move, the pockets close, they have instructed the 5 and 2 players and the distances are so close, and at the same time they’re so WAIYIDE with the wingbacks and Werner in behind
One of the highlights of this video is the way the teams transition. That is so important in maintain shape and defensive integrity, so missing from Man U this season.
I think the goals per game stat is a little misleading. Conte had better players. Costa and Hazard at their peaks is wildly different to anything Chelsea have now. The levels are very different. They were each in the top 5 in their positions. As good as this Chelsea set up is, the individuals are not quite of that calibre yet
Maybe you could make comparison with Conte's 3-4-2-1 Spurs in 2022/23 season. I think he did look back at his Chelsea time to make the team presently. Dier is trained to be the ball carrier and passer like Luiz. Hojbjerg is trained in that Matic role as he's more adventurous going up. Bentancur is acting like the disruptor. Son is given the Hazard role Though Kane is still played like in times with Jose.
I won’t to see why Azpi at RCB was such a weekness in the air on Conte’s team while it not being a problem on Tuchel. How has Tuchel fixed an issue so well that conte had making us forget it was even a problem. If I had to guess it would simply be a higher defensive work ethic from our front three to press quicker. We press quicker and keep more possession so of course deep balls happen less often
The clear difference is definitely during pressing. Conte’s Chelsea prefer to sit back and hit on counters while Tuchel’s Chelsea prefer to press high and up and keeping the ball in the opponent’s half. Also in the wing backs’ roles. Conte’s wingbacks keep the width much like Tuchel’s but Chilwell and James prefer going long to the attackers while Alonso and Moses usually go 1v1 and put in the crosses.
Check out a free trial of Wondershare Filmora X: bit.ly/3eLwgnE . 30% Discount Code : SENBR30
GIVEAWAY: Comment using #createwithFilmora to share what do you think of Filmora to win 1-year free
Wondershare Filmora license.
No
Can you make a Belgium formation 3-4-3 video ? please
@Jordan Harawa try to play your team narrow which will cause the opposition team to come narrow as well which would cause your fullbacks or wingers to have space for crosses or opportunities to score. And playing narrow is also good for counter pressing and winning the ball back
Hi Jordan, I will definitely be doing formation related videos in the future!
you have to mark that it's payed promotion
Conte was such a revolution bringing the 3 at the back tactic to the Premier League, barely anyone use it before him, but after him, a lot clubs also start using it
Thank you Arsenal!
I remember Roberto Martinez's Wigan tore Man City a new one with a 3-4-3
@@finding_aether Very true. But it was a one off in a final. Although, Pochettino's Spurs did use the 3-4-3 relatively frequently before Conte's arrival.
It was LVG that brought 3 at the in the EPL and not Conte..
@@footballbrainer279 “barely anyone use it before him”, and my point is LVG didn’t show the rest of the PL 3 atb can work, it’s Conte who’s done it
Kante and Azpi still in the team and giving their best after Conte. Very resilient guys.
Two Chelsea legends, especially Azpi, who seems to fit into every position and formation no matter what
💯💯
@@justbecause7402 started out as a lb, moved to rb, and now plays as a cb.
two of the most hardworking and trustable players...managers dream
Rudiger also
I think Tuchel would have more goals per game than Conte if he had a striker like Diego Costa because we are attacking and creating more under him. I miss Diego Costa so much 😪
Don’t worry bro we’ll get a striker soon.. I’m guessing Haaland will still come
@@thejamaicandudewith100ksub3 I hope Kai and Werner will start firing this season.
Don't get y Chelsea don't get Adrian Silva he isn't linked much with big teams but he's sooo good and he scores lots of headers
@@andrewhodyss9092 why settle for Andre Silva when you can get Haaland?
And Conte had Hazard
Great video!
Both Conte & Tuchel are implement “positional play” in their systems, but the difference was in their use of possession. Conte’s attack focused more on automatisms and pre-planned attacking moves and we saw this consistently with the way hazard, costa and Pedro linked up.
Tuchel’s attack hasn’t fully clicked, but is more fluid and highly flexible with constant rotations among the forward players. On paper, Conte’s 343 is quite rigid and turns into a 325 in attack as a basic 343 would. Tuchel’s 343 is flexible with Mount & Havertz being key to that tactical flexibility.
Both hybrid players, Mount can perform as either a no.8/no.10 while Havertz can also play as a no.9/10. Tuchel’s 343 can seamlessly transition into a 352 with mount dropping into the midfield to form a trio with Jorginho and Kante as Werner & Havertz reposition to form a front two if the need arises during a game.
Tuchel’s versatility means Chelsea can be adaptable and can move between a 343 and 352 without having to make a substitution while Conte’s was more rigid.
In my opinion, Tuchel has more aces up his sleeve because he isn’t wedded to the 343 like Conte and could also lineup Chelsea in a back 4 next season. Tuchel said “he will build a team that no one wants to play against” and if winning the UCL is the starting point for this team, the potential is truly scary under Tuchel.
Great analysis once again!
Spot on
Exactly. This is what I have been trying to explain to people. Even with Tuchel we could revolt to a 4 back while even playing the 3 back. Have you noticed in some games Rudiger step away from center back to join in the midfield?
TT has the benefit of a very bloated squad to select from as another way of stating he has a lot of aces up his sleeve. Head to head, I would give the edge to Conte due to him having Costa as a trump card.
Hopefully, TT can get a striker like Costa was into the squad and be all the better for for it. With the way our board operates however, it’s never a guarantee that they’ll back any manager.
Tuchel was more possessional.. while at BVB he managed to get 50% possession vs Guardiola
Good one from you
Tuchel formation brings the high pressure that Antoni wasn't using that which is decent if u have players with good stamina
Really the high press what high press..werent they pressing higher then with Victor Moses and Marcus Alonzo
@@876jamaicanyouth They were providing width but the ball would remain with back 3, we would wait for team to press us then Luiz would make a long pass, Kante always sat back to block passing lanes, Costa was very strong to hold defenders and let Hazard n Pedro ran rampant. It didn't work next season cos Morata couldn't occupy defenders, thats y Conte wanted lukaku so bad. In Tuchel system, its more about possession and Reece and Chillwell keeps pressing the wingers, mount and kante keep pressing the midfield and Werner despite missing chances drags out the defenders which creates gap in the middle for Havertz/Pullisic/Ziyech whoever playing. So u can see the two systems are different.
@@rickygervaissaidhi2524 point taken u analysis skills are on point
@@rickygervaissaidhi2524 playing from the back is the most important transformation between these two teams. While you mentioned a very important issue, the other one is jorgi based playing from the back with consistently fresh wbs. Conte suffered heavily due to the speed of wbs in 2nd season also. Tt played azpi,Emerson,cho, Ben,Alonso,RJ in wbs in less then half season which not only created a cohesive environment in the dressing room (same with wingers), but gave speed down the flanks constantly. You can study pep's utilization of rotating flanks. I knew conte was doing that wrong and the board also didn't back him. Klopp is the most cunning of them all , he literally uses cup games to freshen up in between. But I predicted the uprising and downfall correctly for him. I am highly waiting for what will he do next ? Tried to push youth /stamina already last season (Chelsea's lamps formula) . But I highly doubt the consistency with the quality. Chessboards doesn't count fitness unfortunately.
@@maruf2050 I think the issue with gegenpress is eventually you just murder the players. They need a deeper squad or what happened last season will happen again.
I think Conte revived the 3-back formation but Tuchel evolved it to adapt to false nine and so many other key functions. Could you do a tactical analysis of Nuno and what he can bring to Tottenham?
No offense bro but nobody cares about spurs 😉
@@rickygervaissaidhi2524 I do. It’s an interesting team to look at
It's fun to analyze most of the teams
@@Hwella555 its a boring team to look at
0 trophies
As a chelsea fan this video is like heaven for me.
What could have happend if Conte got Virgil and Lukaku
Yea conte wanted Vidal for matic, lukaku for Costa and Vvd for Luiz as replacements. Board didn't support him and he was forced to play ultra defensive without attacking strength. I hope the board backs Tuchel this time and looks like they want to.
@@rickygervaissaidhi2524 Instead he got Morata lol
Lukaku is loser.
@@rickygervaissaidhi2524 the Chelsea DoF back then was really slow at negotiating
Lukaku was suck in utd btw
Can you do a video about Antonio Conte tactics this season?
They won the serie a and they were incredible
How many times did you get confused saying Kante and Conte lmao
This was great! Haven’t seen any of these so called “expert pundits” talk about the tactics in detail like this.
Credit to Kante who's adapted to every coach's style of play
Azpi perhaps
Main difference for me was Conte's use of the wingers (Alonso and Moses) driving up field,,,, and Tuchel's classy use of the midfield : the defence could easily switch midfield and the midfielders could readily assist the front 3.
I had hard times figuring out what role Kante vs Conte...
at one point I thought Conte are the player, and Kante was the Manager LOLOL
The pronunciation is similar
Conte had everyone going back 3 crazy and Victor Moses was amazing that season just brilliant!!!!
Whaddya hear, Whaddya say.
@@sphambatha5799 hacidem but I don't believe em
Not football related but you dp is golden
Moses was an absolute beast that season 💯💯
That background tract is what plays in kante's head when he is running like crazy to come from behind and put in an immaculate tackle .......a tackle so clean the atacker doesnt even want to pretend he was fouled
what track is it?
Kinda love how Sarri was right about Kante all along. We're finally reaping the rewards of his idea.
What did he say about him?
@@orton305 Played Kante in a more advanced role because he saw the talent he had. Got a lot of flack from English media who only thought of Kante as a 6 and not an 8.
I think Zola spoke about this once on TV
@@mihirsabnis7476 i remember, you're correct. He saw what we dint see and he believed in his tactics
TT CFC system is a mix of Conte's 3 at the back system and Sarri's possession based attacking football. Can only hope he stays longer than the other 2.
@@saraha2250 Totally agreed. Also has a few qualities of Tuchel's 4-2-2-2 at PSG sometimes
Conte's system was attacking and had alot of exciting play. Probably because you had Hazard and Costa and experience of Fabregas and Pedro.
Tuchel may lack the attacking firepower but has the most Solid defence and flexibility of play. Just one CF away from total domination
I like Tuchels formation!
There seemed to be a weakness in Conte's methods/patterns for playing out from the back. So much so that teams in the second season were ready for the patterns and pressed high with success. Tuchel's methods/patterns for playing out seem more flexible and varied making it harder for teams to exert the high press successfully.
Cesar azipilicueta a mad respect for him he has played under 8 managers changed positions and never benched no one talks about him he is the most udnerrated defender in epl
Let's just call him Dave
When u have Hazard Costa fabregas your system will work regardless
Thank you !!!!! For doing this, never knew people were thinking of similarities between Conte and TT!
Perhaps the reason Tuchel’s team didn’t score a lot of goals last season was as you pointed out, most teams didn’t press and therefore less space in behind for the attackers to run in behind..I trust Tuchel to come up with something this season though, he’s a smart guy
Is Zidane is much better manager.
suprabhat Paul nah without god tier team he is nothing
@@suprabhatpaul5368 No because TReal Madrid and Barcelona need a good referee to win
@@adidasboy3207 And with a good referree Real Madrid and Barcelona are nothing too...
He's been fired..and his strategy degraded!
I have a huge respect to Tuchel as he made Chelsea, the champions of Europe in very less time💙
Conte is a master at this formation and has gotten it to work very well for multiple teams while also adapting to their strengths and weaknesses. Tuchel, on the other hand, tries too hard to modernize this formation through the constant rotation among the players' positions at the front and that had created more problems for Chelse than it did good.
If these two faced each other I think it would be a really tough, low scoring game as both defences are strong but Diego Costa would make the difference. He was key to us winning so many points, a clutch player that could score from nothing
If this two team face each other, i love to see costa and rudiger fight against each other
@@farhanrosli1046 😂
@@farhanrosli1046 probably literally fighting it out!
dont forget prime eden hazard
@@RasenRendanX there's no need to mention Hazard. We just know already😎
Conte is a world class coach. We need more people like him in modern day football. Give him what he wants and he will deliver. His focus is more on football tactics and less on man management. That's how it should be.
To be fair I've seen Christensen doing what D.Luiz used to do specially when the opposition was focusing more on Jorginho.
Also I'm sure that Matic was more rigid and stayed back in comparison to Kante just like Jorginho stays more back while Kante has more freedom.
This is great video analysis!
I expect there's an update of Tuchel's tactics comparasion with the presence of Lukaku until mid season
I think if tuchel finds a way for making our attacking players fire all cylinders then we could become a force to reckon with for a long long time and also tuchel's Chelsea is definitely superior to conte's !
Agree your first point. Not sure about the second one.
Rubbish....what you are saying make no sense....a coach does not coach his team to miss guild edge Chances. If we had converted 3/4 of our chances we would have ended up above Man Utd. We created more chances than most big clubs in Europe but miss a lot. Tuchel system is so fluid how it bamboozle Pep many times becuz he cannot press a team that play close football . Tuchel system will take out of the first 80m but the last 20m when we get chances to score is a problem. We need Haaland who will make things happen.
I can't say its superior, cause that 2016/17 side was one of the best Chelsea sides I have seen, if only Costa and Matic(his partnership with Kante was perfect) stayed with Chelsea , then it would ve been a 3 horse race between Chelsea ,Liverpool and City in the past 4 seasons
@@user-L13 the team with individual talents....but Tuchel side has more technical players who can control the tempo of the game.
What do you think of both these teams?
Both teams are very hard to break down and are dangerous but compact in all areas of the pitch.
They are both really solid at the back due to their three CBs (also, you can pin your comment so more people see it)
Conte team was better
drop the name of background 🎵 music ? so relaxing and soothing.
Bro, which country are you from?
This is fascinating to look back on now that Conte's at Spurs, still playing with two more defensive minded midfielders but with Kane and Son in place of Costa and Hazard, which means subtle changes in style. Next season will be really interesting.
Nice video! An aspect not talked about is shot conversion from last year under Frank and TT, vs Conte w Diego Costa. Conversion of the many chances we create is why we're about to slap big money down for Haaland.
Conte admires big men in attack. Lukaku, Morata & Pelle were his fulcrums in transitions.
Did Pelle played under Conte?
@@ritamlahiri3137 EURO 2016
@@ritamlahiri3137 graziano pelle
I think we can also add Alonso as a player who featured under both managers. Chilwell is for the long term but Alonso is a tremendous LWB who causes a lot of problems for opposition defences with his raids forward. The signing of Lukaku gives us another dimension in unlocking deep defensive systems.
Another good one. Been reading Michael Cox's book and these last tactical videos have been helping me understand more.
i think Tuchel formation seems to be a bit more complicated, since the front 3 are not stable.
From this video, I’d rather watch Tuchels Chelsea than conte’s
Tuchel’s is a bit less exciting going forward, but I’m a big fan of both for the organization in defense.
@@Logstickzbit less exciting because we cant finish
Good contents man, thanks for that
I would love to see a Conte vs Tuchel game, Conte has been poor on the European scene for years tho whereas Tuchel managed to be more successful
Conte had worse players
Tuche use of formation makes alot of trangles to allow them have a lot of position in games has result giving them a hug change to score and win game
Ever since Tuchel arrived I’ve been waiting for this comparison video thank you
Now THIS is the content i really like!
the biggest mistake Chelsea made is to sake Conte. the biggest decision Chelsea made is to hire Tuchel. well, now I will start watching Chelsea back again then.
Did conte get sacked ?
I thought he left like he did w juve
@@Lsx_g conte got sacked coz Chelsea want to appoint sarri. Conte had said in the media, Chelsea made a mistake when appoint sarri because conte have more titles than sarri at that time
Super quality. Awesome presentation
Amazing video as always
I’m digging the Spartan background music
Like the background music, adds good feel to vid, I know this is random but nice touch 👍
Reece James will likely play RCB. Its already been reported that's where Tuchel envisions him.
Tuchel also has no problem using attacking wings if his two pivot-6's are defensively resolute. Pulisic and CHO have both played in those outside slots normally reserved for James/Azpi/Chilwell/Alonso.
Conte’s 3 atb was more safe and reliable without any pressing structure which suited well with Chelsea’s defence format of park the bus…whereas Tuchel’s 3 atb was very agressive and always looking to create free passing lanes and have majority of the ball, this was helped on by his rotation of his attack.
Antonio conte is one of the best manager!!!! Look the titles he had!!!
This was a good video. Keep up the work.
Very good analysis
The fact Chelsea fans have been so blessed to watch both Conte and Tuchel is madness meanwhile SOME Clubs staying with a manager for 2-4 years... Chelsea model is Ruthless but 10000% Proven Results
Kante, Kova and Jorginho are the difference. Their ability to control the midfield protects the back three. Tuchel’s stallball tactic after an attack proves an offense that is at rest tends to stay at rest.
There is no one like Conte.He is real godfather.As a Chelsea fan I always want to see him back in Chelsea hot seat.The management did not co-operate with him as they are doing now with Tuchel
Really enjoyed watching this analysis of the two managers systems. How about one on Lampard so we can see why his systems didnt work?
Great Analysis mate. I missed Diego Costa 😭😭
Azpi-such a legend
Excellent break down of 2 great managers tactics. Would be beneficial to have quotes from those managers about their tactics to strengthen your arguments/ interpretation of their football approach.
Tuchels team is a lot younger in middle and forwards, so the young lads have the pace to play end to end football. Defending and tackling is the key here. Watch highlight of Werner dending and getting into counter attack for the 1st goal in the 2-0 win against Atletico Madrid in the cl.
You truely make football simple. Keep up
In order to beat chelsea next game with man city.
What should guoardiola do and avoid to not put man city in embarrassment situation as he used to do always.
How he can stop chelsea from building upand especially controlling their midfielders?
In today’s premiere league where a pacy winger often makes the day
A three central defenders reinforced by two pacy corner backs is the answer.
Main difference between Conte and Tuchel is the latter believes in keeping the ball in the opponent’s half hence the high pressing and aggressive use of Kante.
We will see a different front three tactics when a proper center forward arrives
I liked Conte's side better because of the verticality in attack, use of a more rigid front 3 and the style of defending.
I also like Tuchel's tactics as it is one of the least boring possession based sides. Also we are quite solid defensively especially towards the end of the season.
Tuchel doesn't have players like Hazard (that can dribble past two or three players) and Diego Costa (strong physical striker)..
Experience is lacking in front but the talent is tremendous. This is ultimately a team for the future. Teams should be very afraid.
tuchel have lukaku
Outstanding discuss.
Take love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Tuchel can play beautiful football with a defensive formation. That's the beauty of Tuchel.
but also don't forget tuchel started using 3 back halfway thru the season while Conte's been using 3 back since his Italy days
I'd love to see a comparison between Tuchel's Chelsea and Sarri's Chelsea. They look different but they have several things in common.
στην πραγματικότητα όλη την προεργασία την έκανε ο sarri που έφερε το παιχνίδι κατοχης και το passing game
@@reff9203 Σωστος ο παιχτης. Αλλα αμυντικα εσφιξε η ομαδα με Τουχελ. Εχει ενδιαφερον ποσα κοινα εχουν στο passing game
I love your videos
Conte had brilliant attackers at their peaks while tuchel has werner 🤣🤣🤣. Irrespective both managers manage well according to their squads
Tuchels midfield squeeze horizontslly in position. You'll often see Kante playing small one two's with the right wing back and right forward to progress the ball
Really Love your videos 😍. How about a video of a tactical preview of Bayern under Nagelsmann 🙃
Coming soon
😍 3-4-3 😍
alonso also now play his same role like he did in conte system
Why Chelsea play so good? Because Chelsea have 3 central defenders close the two holding midfielders relating move, the pockets close, they have instructed the 5 and 2 players and the distances are so close, and at the same time they’re so WAIYIDE with the wingbacks and Werner in behind
I’m sorry this’s copy and paste “pep’s statement 😄 …no hard feelings
We’re Chelsea 🤝
One of the highlights of this video is the way the teams transition. That is so important in maintain shape and defensive integrity, so missing from Man U this season.
Amazing Analysis As Always. A+ .
good analysis, I prefered Conte team
I use 532 in fifa since 2005 until now
I think the goals per game stat is a little misleading. Conte had better players. Costa and Hazard at their peaks is wildly different to anything Chelsea have now. The levels are very different. They were each in the top 5 in their positions. As good as this Chelsea set up is, the individuals are not quite of that calibre yet
Agreed, however we're not dependent on individual performances so much. I think we're a better side.
Brilliant.. Hope to see ur future videos after lukaku impact same as Costa....
Tuchel scheme is my favourite to use in Pes 6(winning eleven 10). I like to pressure the oposite team using pressure defending.
Maybe you could make comparison with Conte's 3-4-2-1 Spurs in 2022/23 season. I think he did look back at his Chelsea time to make the team presently.
Dier is trained to be the ball carrier and passer like Luiz.
Hojbjerg is trained in that Matic role as he's more adventurous going up.
Bentancur is acting like the disruptor.
Son is given the Hazard role
Though Kane is still played like in times with Jose.
Only Apilicueta and Kante are present in both teams
Glad to come across this channel. Can we have a preview of the Super Cup as well as the community shield manager tactics?
Great work! Time to make updated video with Lukaku.
I won’t to see why Azpi at RCB was such a weekness in the air on Conte’s team while it not being a problem on Tuchel. How has Tuchel fixed an issue so well that conte had making us forget it was even a problem.
If I had to guess it would simply be a higher defensive work ethic from our front three to press quicker. We press quicker and keep more possession so of course deep balls happen less often
Pls do a video about Claudio Ranieri Leicester City title winning tatics
A great insight to the differences in the similarities
No criticism but this is seemingly already outdated given the tactical changes since Lukaku's arrival. Interesting watch nonetheless.
I’m surprised the wingbacks weren’t even mentioned tbh. Great vid though
The clear difference is definitely during pressing. Conte’s Chelsea prefer to sit back and hit on counters while Tuchel’s Chelsea prefer to press high and up and keeping the ball in the opponent’s half. Also in the wing backs’ roles. Conte’s wingbacks keep the width much like Tuchel’s but Chilwell and James prefer going long to the attackers while Alonso and Moses usually go 1v1 and put in the crosses.
Hell yeah I was waiting for a video like this
Conte is defense first counterattack-based football
Tuchel is possession first defensive-based football
In Chelsea Matic wear Jersey number 21..not 31
😅😅😅
Such amazing content 🙏🏾🙏🏾